秸秆燃烧排放PM<sub>2.5</sub>特征及影响因素研究

引用本文: 王玉珏, 胡敏, 王渝, 秦艳红, 陈红阳, 曾立民, 雷建容, 黄晓锋, 何凌燕, 张瑞芹, 吴志军. 秸秆燃烧排放PM_2.5特征及影响因素研究[J]. 化学学报, 2016, 74(4): 356-362. doi: 10.6023/A16010008 shu

Citation: Wang Yujue, Hu Min, Wang Yu, Qin Yanhong, Chen Hongyang, Zeng Limin, Lei Jianrong, Huang Xiaofeng, He Lingyan, Zhang Ruiqin, Wu Zhijun. Characterization and Influence Factors of PM_2.5 Emitted from Crop Straw Burning[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2016, 74(4): 356-362. doi: 10.6023/A16010008 shu

秸秆燃烧排放PM_2.5特征及影响因素研究

王玉珏 ^a, ,
胡敏 ^{a,
,} ,
王渝 ^a, ,
秦艳红 ^a, ,
陈红阳 ^c, ,
曾立民 ^a, ,
雷建容 ^b, ,
黄晓锋 ^b, ,
何凌燕 ^b, ,
张瑞芹 ^c, ,
吴志军 ^a,

a.
a. 环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室北京大学环境科学与工程学院北京 100871;
b.
b. 城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室北京大学深圳研究生院环境与能源学院深圳 518055;
c.
c. 郑州大学化学系郑州 450001

通讯作者: 胡敏

基金项目:
项目受环保部公益性行业科研专项(No. 201409010) (No. 201409010)

国家自然科学基金重大项目(Nos. 91544214, 21190052) (Nos. 91544214, 21190052)

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(No. XDB05010500)资助. (No. XDB05010500)

摘要: 生物质燃烧向大气中排放大量颗粒污染物, 在中国, 收获季节大量秸秆被直接露天燃烧处理, 对区域环境质量和人体健康造成严重影响. 对我国最主要的两种粮食作物玉米和小麦秸秆的露天燃烧进行模拟, 分析颗粒物排放水平, 特征及影响因素. 玉米和小麦秸秆燃烧PM_2.5排放因子分别为1082.8和835.7~897.3 mg/kg. 有机物是颗粒物最主要组分, 总量占PM_2.5质量的42%~66%. Cl^-和K⁺分别占PM_2.5总质量的4%~15%和2%~14%, K⁺/EC值为0.5~3.8. 各物种在颗粒物中所占比例与之前研究结果一致. 秸秆含水量和燃烧温度影响PM_2.5排放水平和组成特征. 随秸秆含水量增加, PM_2.5和OC的排放因子增加; 秸秆含水量增加, 燃烧温度逐渐降低, 由生物质燃料释放进入烟气中的K⁺和Cl^-比例逐渐减小导致二者在颗粒物中的比例降低. 我国每年由玉米和小麦秸秆露天燃烧排放的PM_2.5和OC分别为92.7 Gg和47.5 Gg, 在总量中占重要比例.

关键词:

English

Characterization and Influence Factors of PM_2.5 Emitted from Crop Straw Burning

a.
a State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
b.
b Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055;
c.
c Department of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001

Corresponding author: 胡敏

Received Date: 05 January 2016
Available Online: 29 February 2016
Fund Project:
项目受环保部公益性行业科研专项(No. 201409010)

国家自然科学基金重大项目(Nos. 91544214, 21190052)

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(No. XDB05010500)资助.

Abstract: Large quantities of particulate pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere during biomass burning processes. In China, large amounts of agricultural residues are burned in the field during harvest seasons, which influence regional air quality and human health. Corn and wheat are two major crops grown in China, whose burning was simulated in this study. The controlled laboratory simulation of straw burning was performed in the Laboratory of Biomass Burning Simulation at Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School. The burning simulation system was improved and verified. Straw burning aerosols (PM_2.5) samples were collected and measured by gravimetric method. Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) were measured by thermal/optical method. Water-soluble inorganic ions and organic matter were measured by ion chromatography. Emission level, characterization and influence factors of crop straw burning aerosols are discussed. PM_2.5 emission factors of corn and wheat straw burning are 1082.8 and 835.7~897.3 mg/kg, respectively. Organic matter (OM), which is calculated by multiplying organic carbon (OC) by 1.3, is the major component of PM_2.5, accounting for 42%~66% of the total mass. Nearly half (37%~50%) of OM are water soluble. Cl^- and K⁺are two major components among water-soluble inorganic ions, accounting for 4%~15% and 2%~14% of total particle mass, respectively. The K⁺/EC ratio is 0.5~3.8. The proportions of these species in PM_2.5 are comparable to previous studies. Straw moisture content and burning temperature influence the emission level and characterization of straw burning aerosols. Emission factors of PM_2.5 and OC increase with the increase of straw moisture content because of incomplete burning. With higher moisture content, more thermal energy is used for the evaporation of water, lowering the burning temperature. Then less proportion of K⁺and Cl^- are released from biomass into the smoke. Therefore, their contributions to the particle mass decrease with the increase of straw moisture content. The emissions of PM_2.5 and OC/EC by crop straw burning in the field are estimated based on the emission factors obtained in this study. Corn and wheat burning in the field yield 92.7 Gg PM_2.5 and 47.5 Gg OC every year in China, accounting for important fractions among the total mass.

Key words:

1. [1] Simoneit, B. R. T. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17, 129.[1] Simoneit, B. R. T. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17, 129.
2. [2] Anderson, B. E.; Grant, W. B.; Gregory, G. L.; Browell, E. V.; Collins, J. E.; Sachse, G. W.; Bagwell, D. R.; Hudgins, C. H.; Blake, D. R.; Blake, N. J. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 24117.[2] Anderson, B. E.; Grant, W. B.; Gregory, G. L.; Browell, E. V.; Collins, J. E.; Sachse, G. W.; Bagwell, D. R.; Hudgins, C. H.; Blake, D. R.; Blake, N. J. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 24117.
3. [3] Cheng, Y.; Engling, G.; He, K. B.; Duan, F. K.; Ma, Y. L.; Du, Z. Y.; Liu, J. M.; Zheng, M.; Weber, R. J. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 7765.[3] Cheng, Y.; Engling, G.; He, K. B.; Duan, F. K.; Ma, Y. L.; Du, Z. Y.; Liu, J. M.; Zheng, M.; Weber, R. J. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 7765.
4. [4] Khan, A. A.; de Jong, W.; Jansens, P. J.; Spliethoff, H. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 21.[4] Khan, A. A.; de Jong, W.; Jansens, P. J.; Spliethoff, H. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 21.
5. [5] Radzi bin Abas, M.; Oros, D. R.; Simoneit, B. R. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 1089.[5] Radzi bin Abas, M.; Oros, D. R.; Simoneit, B. R. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 1089.
6. [6] Andreae, M. O.; Merlet, P. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 955.[6] Andreae, M. O.; Merlet, P. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 955.
7. [7] Iinuma, Y.; Brüggemann, E.; Gnauk, T.; Müller, K.; Andreae, M. O.; Helas, G.; Parmar, R.; Herrmann, H. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112.[7] Iinuma, Y.; Brüggemann, E.; Gnauk, T.; Müller, K.; Andreae, M. O.; Helas, G.; Parmar, R.; Herrmann, H. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112.
8. [8] Streets, D. G.; Yarber, K. F.; Woo, J. H.; Carmichael, G. R. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2003, 17, 1099.[8] Streets, D. G.; Yarber, K. F.; Woo, J. H.; Carmichael, G. R. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2003, 17, 1099.
9. [9] Cao, G. L.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zheng, F. C. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 6516.[9] Cao, G. L.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zheng, F. C. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 6516.
10. [10] Yan, X. Y.; Ohara, T.; Akimoto, H. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 5262.[10] Yan, X. Y.; Ohara, T.; Akimoto, H. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 5262.
11. [11] Li, X.; Wang, S.; Duan, L.; Hao, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6052.[11] Li, X.; Wang, S.; Duan, L.; Hao, J.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6052.
12. [12] Hays, M. D.; Fine, P. M.; Geron, C. D.; Kleeman, M. J.; Gullett, B. K. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6747.[12] Hays, M. D.; Fine, P. M.; Geron, C. D.; Kleeman, M. J.; Gullett, B. K. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6747.
13. [13] Turn, S. Q.; Jenkins, B. M.; Chow, J. C.; Pritchett, L. C.; Campbell, D.; Cahill, T.; Whalen, S. A. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 1997, 102, 3683.[13] Turn, S. Q.; Jenkins, B. M.; Chow, J. C.; Pritchett, L. C.; Campbell, D.; Cahill, T.; Whalen, S. A. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 1997, 102, 3683.
14. [14] Li, J. F.; Song, Y.; Mao, Y.; Mao, Z. C.; Wu, Y. S.; Li, M. M.; Huang, X.; He, Q. C.; Hu, M. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 442.[14] Li, J. F.; Song, Y.; Mao, Y.; Mao, Z. C.; Wu, Y. S.; Li, M. M.; Huang, X.; He, Q. C.; Hu, M. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 442.
15. [15] Sanchis, E.; Ferrer, M.; Calvet, S.; Coscollà, C.; Yusà, V.; Cambra-López, M. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98, 25.[15] Sanchis, E.; Ferrer, M.; Calvet, S.; Coscollà, C.; Yusà, V.; Cambra-López, M. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98, 25.
16. [16] Shen, G.; Xue, M.; Wei, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, R.; Shen, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Wei, W.; Zhao, Q.; Li, B.; Wu, H.; Tao, S. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 511.[16] Shen, G.; Xue, M.; Wei, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, R.; Shen, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Wei, W.; Zhao, Q.; Li, B.; Wu, H.; Tao, S. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 511.
17. [17] Lu, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, N. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 978.[17] Lu, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, N. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 978.
18. [18] Ortiz de Zárate, I.; Ezcurra, A.; Lacaux, J. P.; Van Dinh, P. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3183.[18] Ortiz de Zárate, I.; Ezcurra, A.; Lacaux, J. P.; Van Dinh, P. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3183.
19. [19] Nguyen, B. C.; Putaud, J. P.; Mihalopoulos, N.; Bonsang, B.; Doan, C. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1994, 31, 131.[19] Nguyen, B. C.; Putaud, J. P.; Mihalopoulos, N.; Bonsang, B.; Doan, C. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1994, 31, 131.
20. [20] Levin, E. J. T.; McMeeking, G. R.; Carrico, C. M.; Mack, L. E.; Kreidenweis, S. M.; Wold, C. E.; Moosmüller, H.; Arnott, W. P.; Hao, W. M.; Collett, J. L.; Malm, W. C. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115.[20] Levin, E. J. T.; McMeeking, G. R.; Carrico, C. M.; Mack, L. E.; Kreidenweis, S. M.; Wold, C. E.; Moosmüller, H.; Arnott, W. P.; Hao, W. M.; Collett, J. L.; Malm, W. C. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115.
21. [21] Dhammapala, R.; Claiborn, C.; Corkill, J.; Gullett, B. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1007.[21] Dhammapala, R.; Claiborn, C.; Corkill, J.; Gullett, B. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1007.
22. [22] Guo, S.; Hu, M.; Guo, Q.; Shang, D. Acta Chim. Sinica 2014, 72, 658. (郭松, 胡敏, 郭庆丰, 尚冬杰, 化学学报, 2014, 72, 658.)[22] Guo, S.; Hu, M.; Guo, Q.; Shang, D. Acta Chim. Sinica 2014, 72, 658. (郭松, 胡敏, 郭庆丰, 尚冬杰, 化学学报, 2014, 72, 658.)
23. [23] Bae, M.-S.; Park, S.-S. Asian J. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 7, 95.[23] Bae, M.-S.; Park, S.-S. Asian J. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 7, 95.
24. [24] Chen, L. W. A.; Verburg, P.; Shackelford, A.; Zhu, D.; Susfalk, R.; Chow, J. C.; Watson, J. G. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 6617.[24] Chen, L. W. A.; Verburg, P.; Shackelford, A.; Zhu, D.; Susfalk, R.; Chow, J. C.; Watson, J. G. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 6617.
25. [25] Bjorkman, E.; Stromberg, B. Energy Fuels 1997, 11, 1026.[25] Bjorkman, E.; Stromberg, B. Energy Fuels 1997, 11, 1026.
26. [26] Jensen, P. A.; Frandsen, F. J.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Sander, B. Energy Fuels 2000, 14, 1280.[26] Jensen, P. A.; Frandsen, F. J.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Sander, B. Energy Fuels 2000, 14, 1280.
27. [27] Knudsen, J. N.; Jensen, P. A.; Dam-Johansen, K. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1385.[27] Knudsen, J. N.; Jensen, P. A.; Dam-Johansen, K. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1385.
28. [28] He, L. Y.; Lin, Y.; Huang, X. F.; Guo, S.; Xue, L.; Su, Q.; Hu, M.; Luan, S. J.; Zhang, Y. H. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 11535.[28] He, L. Y.; Lin, Y.; Huang, X. F.; Guo, S.; Xue, L.; Su, Q.; Hu, M.; Luan, S. J.; Zhang, Y. H. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 11535.
29. [29] Guo, S.; Hu, M.; Wang, Z. B.; Slanina, J.; Zhao, Y. L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 947.[29] Guo, S.; Hu, M.; Wang, Z. B.; Slanina, J.; Zhao, Y. L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 947.
30. [30] Huan, N.; Zeng, L. M.; Shao, M.; Cui, L.; Mao, J. T.; Zhou, N.; Dong, H. B.; Yu, Z. Y.; Luo, Z. M. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekinensis 2006, 42, 265 (in Chinese). (郇宁, 曾立民, 邵敏, 崔良, 毛节泰, 周楠, 董华斌, 俞仲英, 罗志明, 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42, 265.)[30] Huan, N.; Zeng, L. M.; Shao, M.; Cui, L.; Mao, J. T.; Zhou, N.; Dong, H. B.; Yu, Z. Y.; Luo, Z. M. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekinensis 2006, 42, 265 (in Chinese). (郇宁, 曾立民, 邵敏, 崔良, 毛节泰, 周楠, 董华斌, 俞仲英, 罗志明, 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42, 265.)
31. [31] Koopmans, A.; Koppejan, J. Regional Consultation on Modern Applications of Biomass Energy 1997, 6.[31] Koopmans, A.; Koppejan, J. Regional Consultation on Modern Applications of Biomass Energy 1997, 6.
32. [32] Hao, W. M.; Liu, M. H. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 1994, 8, 495.[32] Hao, W. M.; Liu, M. H. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 1994, 8, 495.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 0
文章访问数: 990
HTML全文浏览量: 138

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

秸秆燃烧排放PM_2.5特征及影响因素研究

通讯作者: 胡敏

English

Characterization and Influence Factors of PM_2.5 Emitted from Crop Straw Burning

Corresponding author: 胡敏

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

秸秆燃烧排放PM2.5特征及影响因素研究

通讯作者: 胡敏

English

Characterization and Influence Factors of PM2.5 Emitted from Crop Straw Burning

Corresponding author: 胡敏

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

秸秆燃烧排放PM_2.5特征及影响因素研究

Characterization and Influence Factors of PM_2.5 Emitted from Crop Straw Burning

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs