English

Relation between NiMo(O) Phase Structures and Hydrogen Evolution Activities of Water Electrolysis

• Aoqi Wang ^{1, 2,} ,
• Jun Chen ^{2, 3,} ,
• Pengfei Zhang ^{2, 3,} ,
• Shan Tang ^{2, 3,} ,
• Zhaochi Feng ^2, ,
• Tingting Yao ^{2, 3, ,} ,
• Can Li ^{1, 2, 3, ,}

• 1.

  Department of Chemical Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

• 2.

  State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China

• 3.

  University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: Tingting Yao, ttyao@dicp.ac.cn Can Li, canli@dicp.ac.cn

• Received Date: 14 January 2023
  Accepted Date: 07 February 2023
  Revised Date: 05 February 2023
  Available Online: 15 April 2023
• Fund Project:

Abstract: NiMo(O) catalysts show extremely low overpotential at high current density for the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). However, the real reason for the remarkable electrocatalytic activity is unclear. A new perspective for revealing the relation between the phase structures of the electrocatalysts and their electrocatalytic HER performance provides a deep insight into the nature of the HER. Herein, the dehydration and oxygenation of as-synthesized nickel molybdate hydrate (NiMoO₄·nH₂O) are discussed and confirmed to be critical for evolving the catalytic phase structures in the subsequent reduction treatment. The typical phase evolution processes of the electrocatalysts were investigated using thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and H₂ temperature-programmed reduction (H₂-TPR). The crystalline phases were identified through X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analyses. The phases of the electrocatalysts during the electrochemical tests were confirmed by in situ electrochemical XRD characterization. Three typical crystalline phases, MoNi₄, β-NiMoO₄, and α-NiMoO₄, corresponding to significantly different HER activities, were proposed. The β-NiMoO₄ dominant electrocatalyst (NiMoO₄-400air-H₂) exhibited the worst performance for alkaline water reduction, and an improvement was observed for the α-NiMoO₄ electrocatalyst (NiMoO₄-500air-H₂). The NiMoO₄-300air-H₂ electrode derived from NiMoO₄·(n−x)H₂O exhibited the most active phase (MoNi₄) and the best electrocatalytic HER performance. Moreover, the intrinsic electrocatalytic HER performance obtained from the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) normalized activities exhibits the same tendency as the geometrically normalized ones. Varied adsorption capacities of the H₂O, OH, and H intermediate species for water reduction on these typical phases are assumed to be responsible for the significantly different HER performance of the NiMoO₄-(T)air-H₂ electrodes through density functional theory analysis. Poor adsorption of H, OH radicals, and H₂O on β-NiMoO₄ impedes the water dissociation process, which may be the reason that it exhibits the worst electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Optimized adsorption abilities of H, OH, and H₂O on α-NiMoO₄ benefit the water reduction kinetics, leading to an enhanced electrocatalytic HER performance. MoNi₄ forms the strongest interactions with H₂O, H, and OH species, contributing to the best electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Further analysis of the energy barrier of the water-splitting reaction shows that these three crystalline phases exhibit different water dissociation ability, which is attributed to their varied adsorption capacities of the intermediate species for water reduction. Among them, MoNi₄ and β-NiMoO₄ exhibit the lowest and highest water dissociation barriers, respectively, in line with their electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activities. The phase-dependent HER activity identified in this work can provide guidelines for rationally designing and adjusting the structures of active NiMo(O) electrocatalysts.

Key words:
• Electrocatalysis
•  /  Water splitting
•  /  Hydrogen
•  /  Nickel molybdate
•  /  Crystalline Phase

• 1. [1]

     Chu, S.; Majumdar, A. Nature 2012, 488, 294. doi: 10.1038/nature11475

  2. [2]

     Zang, Y.; Niu, S.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Cai, J.; Ye, Y.; Xie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, J.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1217. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09210-0

  3. [3]

     李梦婷, 郑星群, 李莉, 魏子栋. 物理化学学报, 2020, 37, 2007054. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WLHX202112007.htmLi, M.; Zheng, X; Li, L.; Wei, Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 37, 2007054. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WLHX202112007.htm

  4. [4]

     Chen, Y. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, T.; Hao, L.; Niu, S.; Dai, Z. H.; Wan, L. J.; Hu, J. -S. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703311. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703311

  5. [5]

     Jin, Y.; Yue, X.; Shu, C.; Huang, S.; Shen, P. K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2508. doi: 10.1039/C6TA10802D

  6. [6]

     Fang, M.; Gao, W.; Dong, G.; Xia, Z.; Yip, S.; Qin, Y.; Qu, Y.; Ho, J. C. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 247. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.005

  7. [7]

     Wang, Z. Y.; Chen, J. Y.; Song, E. H.; Wang, N.; Dong, J. C.; Zhang, X.; Ajayan, P. M.; Yao, W.; Wang, C. F.; Liu, J. J.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5960. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26256-1

  8. [8]

     Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Tang, J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12361. doi: 10.1039/C8TA03047B

  9. [9]

     Eda, K.; Kato, Y.; Ohshiro, Y.; Sugitani, T.; Whittingham, M. S. J. Solid State Chem. 2010, 183, 1334. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.04.009

  10. [10]

      Peng, S.; Li, L.; Wu, H. B.; Madhavi, S.; Lou, X. W. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401172. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401172

  11. [11]

      Naik, K. K.; Ratha, S.; Rout, C. S. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 5187. doi: 10.1002/slct.201600795

  12. [12]

      Lyu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, S. P.; Wang, S. Small 2020, 16, 1906867. doi: 10.1002/smll.201906867

  13. [13]

      Ghosh, D.; Giri, S.; Das, C. K. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 10428. doi: 10.1039/C3NR02444J

  14. [14]

      Dürr, R. N.; Maltoni, P.; Tian, H.; Jousselme, B.; Hammarström, L.; Edvinsson, T. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13504. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04126

  15. [15]

      Haetge, J.; Djerdj, I.; Brezesinski, T. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6726. doi: 10.1039/C2CC31570J

  16. [16]

      Abdel-Dayem, H. M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 2466. doi: 10.1021/ie0613467

  17. [17]

      Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; Ma, M.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Liu, H. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127686. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127686

  18. [18]

      Dufresne, P.; Payen, E.; Grimblot, J.; Bonnelle, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2344. doi: 10.1021/j150616a010

  19. [19]

      Coats, A. W.; Redfern, J. P. Analyst 1963, 88, 906. doi: 10.1039/AN9638800906

  20. [20]

      Klimova, T. E.; Valencia, D.; Mendoza-Nieto, J. A.; Hernández-Hipólito, P. J. Catal. 2013, 304, 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.03.027

  21. [21]

      Hildal, K.; Perepezko, J. H. Chapter 19-Metals and Alloys. In Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry; Vyazovkin, S., Koga, N., Schick, C., Eds. Elsevier Science B. V. : Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018; Vol. 6, pp. 781–828.

  22. [22]

      Knyazheva, O. A.; Baklanova, O. N.; Lavrenov, A. V.; Buluchevskii, E. A.; Gulyaeva, T. I.; Leont'eva, N. N.; Drozdov, V. A.; Likholobov, V. A.; Vasilevich, A. V. Catal. Ind. 2012, 4, 179. doi: 10.1134/S2070050412030051

  23. [23]

      Gao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, K.; Wu, H.; Guo, J.; Zhang, L.; Duan, A.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, Y. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 28879. doi: 10.1039/C8RA05675G

  24. [24]

      Rodriguez, J. A.; Hanson, J. C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Kim, J. Y.; Pérez, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 346. doi: 10.1021/ja0121080

  25. [25]

      Rodriguez, J. A.; Chaturvedi, S.; Hanson, J. C.; Brito, J. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 770. doi: 10.1021/jp983115m

  26. [26]

      Ratha, S.; Samantara, A. K.; Singha, K. K.; Gangan, A. S.; Chakraborty, B.; Jena, B. K.; Rout, C. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 9640. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16250

  27. [27]

      Rodriguez, J. A.; Hanson, J. C.; Chaturvedi, S.; Maiti, A.; Brito, J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 935. doi: 10.1063/1.480619

  28. [28]

      Kim, K. S.; Baitinger, W. E.; Amy, J. W.; Winograd, N. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1974, 5, 351. doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(74)85023-1

•