English

Strategies to Improve the Energy Density of Non-Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries

• Guangtao Cong ^{1, ,} ,
• Yi-Chun Lu ^{2, ,}

• 1.

  Institute of Low-dimensional Materials Genome Initiative, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, China

• 2.

  Electrochemical Energy and Interfaces Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T. 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China

Author Bio: Guangtao Cong received his Ph.D.degree in Mechanical and Automation Engineering from The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) in 2018. Dr.Cong worked as a research associate under the supervision of Prof.Yi-Chun Lu at CUHK before he joined the College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering at Shenzhen University as an Assistant Professor.Dr.Cong's research interests focus on organic electrodes.;Prof. Yi-Chun Lu received her B.S. degree in Materials Science & Engineering from National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan in 2007 and earned her Ph.D. degree in Materials Science & Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2012. Prof. Lu worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Chemistry at the Technische Universität München, Germany in 2013. She is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Automation Engineering at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Prof. Lu’s research interest centers on fundamental redox chemistry and developing functional materials for clean energy storage and conversion;

Corresponding author: Guangtao Cong, gtcong@szu.edu.cn Yi-Chun Lu, yichunlu@mae.cuhk.edu.hk

• Received Date: 02 June 2021
  Accepted Date: 01 July 2021
  Revised Date: 30 June 2021
  Available Online: 15 June 2022
• Fund Project:

Abstract: Redox flow batteries (RFBs) have been widely recognized as the primary choice for large-scale energy storage due to their high energy efficiency, low cost, and versatile design of decoupled energy storage and power output. However, the broad deployment of RFBs in the power grid has long been plagued by the high cost and low energy density of existing inorganic metal-based electrodes. Redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), on the other hand, have recently been extensively explored as the potentials electrodes in RFBs for their potential low cost, abundant resources, and highly tunable structure. The energy density of RFBs is proportional to the number of electrons transferred per unit reaction, the concentration of active materials, and the cell voltage. Therefore, strategies to improve the energy density of RFBs could be categorized into three classes: (1) expanding the cell voltage; (2) maximizing the practical concentration of active materials; (3) realizing multi-redox process. Benefited by the highly tunable structure and properties of ROMs, the cell voltage of RFBs could be realized by lowering the redox potentials of anolytes or/and increasing the redox potentials of catholytes. To fully exploit the low-potential anolytes and high-potential catholytes, non-aqueous electrolytes with wider electrochemical potential windows (EPWs) are preferred over the aqueous systems. However, the solubility of most ROMs in commonly used non-aqueous electrolytes is very limited. Several effective strategies to improve the practical concentrations of ROMs have been proposed: (1) the solubility of ROMs could be easily tailored by adjusting the intermolecular interactions between ROMs and the interactions between ROMs and electrolytes via molecular engineering; (2) the redox-active eutectic systems remain liquid at or near room temperature, allowing us to reduce or completely remove the inactive solvent used in the conventional electrolyte of RFBs, which leads to an enhanced practical concentration of the redox-active components; (3) the semi-solid suspension achieves a high practical concentration of ROMs by combining the advantages of solid ROMs with high energy density and liquid electrolytes with flowability; (4) the redox-targeting approach breaks the solubility limitation by realizing remote charge exchange between the solid active materials deposited in the tanks and the current collectors of the electrochemical stacks via ROMs dissolved in electrolytes. The first three strategies employ a homogeneous flowing redox-active fluid which suffers from deteriorated physical and electrochemical properties as the practical concentration of ROMs increase, e.g., high viscosity, phase separation, and salt precipitation. The redox-targeting approach uses a hybrid flowing liquid/static solid system, which avoids the aforementioned unfavorable changes in electrolyte properties, however, this design introduces additional chemical reactions between the ROMs and the solid active materials, which may reduce the power output. Another efficient method to improve the energy density of RFBs without affecting the properties of the electrolyte is achieved by realizing the multi-redox process of ROMs, however, the generated high valence state ROMs are highly reactive. Further optimization of the structure of these ROMs is required to improve their lifetime at high valence states. In this perspective, we summarize the general working principle of the RFBs, highlight the recent developments of the ROMs in non-aqueous redox flow batteries (NRFBs), with an emphasis on the strategies to improve the energy density of NRFBs, and discuss the remaining challenges and future directions of the non-aqueous organic redox flow batteries (NORFBs).

Key words:
• Redox-active organic molecule
•  /  Flow battery
•  /  Energy density
•  /  Power output

• 1. [1]

     Soloveichik, G. L. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11533. doi: 10.1021/cr500720t

  2. [2]

     Winsberg, J.; Hagemann, T.; Janoschka, T.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 686. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604925

  3. [3]

     Wei, X.; Pan, W.; Duan, W.; Hollas, A.; Yang, Z.; Li, B.; Nie, Z.; Liu, J.; Reed, D.; Wang, W.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 2187. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00650

  4. [4]

     Muench, S.; Wild, A.; Friebe, C.; Häupler, B.; Janoschka, T.; Schubert, U. S. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9438. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00070

  5. [5]

     Chen, H.; Cong, G.; Lu, Y. C. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27, 1304. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.009

  6. [6]

     Yao, Y.; Lei, J.; Shi, Y.; Ai, F.; Lu, Y. C. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 582. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00772-8

  7. [7]

     Li, Z.; Lu, Y. C. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 517. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00804-x

  8. [8]

     Wang, C.; Li, X.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Lin, H.; Ma, J.; Li, G.; Jin, Z. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 411. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02676

  9. [9]

     Wang, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Yan, W.; Zhu, G.; Ma, L.; Yu, B.; Wang, L.; Li, G.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2404. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01296

  10. [10]

      Wang, C.; Yu, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Z. Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 36, 417. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.019

  11. [11]

      Kwabi, D. G.; Ji, Y.; Aziz, M. J. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6467. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599

  12. [12]

      Singh, V.; Kim, S.; Kang, J.; Byon, H. R. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 1988. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2355-2

  13. [13]

      Gentil, S.; Reynard, D.; Girault, H. H. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 7. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.12.006

  14. [14]

      Polcari, D.; Dauphin-Ducharme, P.; Mauzeroll, J. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 13234. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00067

  15. [15]

      Remya, G. S.; Suresh, C. H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 20615. doi: 10.1039/C6CP02936A

  16. [16]

      McMurry, J. E. Organic Chemistry, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, 2012.

  17. [17]

      Williams, D. L.; Byrne, J. J.; Driscoll, J. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1969, 116, 2. doi: 10.1149/1.2411755

  18. [18]

      Wei, X.; Xu, W.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Walter, E.; Lawrence, C.; Vijayakumar, M.; Henderson, W. A.; Liu, T.; Cosimbescu, L.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8684. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501443

  19. [19]

      Xing, X.; Huo, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 17488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.034

  20. [20]

      Li, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Huang, K.; Fang, D.; Wang, F.; Peng, S. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2011, 14, A171. doi: 10.1149/2.012112esl

  21. [21]

      Huang, J.; Yang, Z.; Vijayakumar, M.; Duan, W.; Hollas, A.; Pan, B.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.; Zhang, L. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018, 2, 1700131. doi: 10.1002/adsu.201700131

  22. [22]

      Sevov, C. S.; Brooner, R. E. M.; Chénard, E.; Assary, R. S.; Moore, J. S.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14465. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09572

  23. [23]

      Wei, X.; Duan, W.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, B.; Reed, D.; Xu, W.; Sprenkle, V.; Wang, W. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 705. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00255

  24. [24]

      Xing, X.; Liu, Q.; Li, J.; Han, Z.; Wang, B.; Lemmon, J. P. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14214. doi: 10.1039/C9CC07937H

  25. [25]

      Duan, W.; Huang, J.; Kowalski, J. A.; Shkrob, I. A.; Vijayakumar, M.; Walter, E.; Pan, B.; Yang, Z.; Milshtein, J. D.; Li, B.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1156. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00261

  26. [26]

      McClelland, B. J. Chem. Rev. 1964, 64, 301. doi: 10.1021/cr60229a005

  27. [27]

      Holy, N. L. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 243. doi: 10.1021/cr60288a005

  28. [28]

      Gong, K.; Fang, Q.; Gu, S.; Li, S. F. Y.; Yan, Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3515. doi: 10.1039/C5EE02341F

  29. [29]

      Yu, J.; Hu, Y. S.; Pan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Huang, X.; Chen, L. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14629. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14629

  30. [30]

      Wang, G.; Huang, B.; Liu, D.; Zheng, D.; Harris, J.; Xue, J.; Qu, D. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13286. doi: 10.1039/C8TA03221A

  31. [31]

      Cong, G.; Wang, W.; Lai, N. C.; Liang, Z.; Lu, Y. C. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 390. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0286-7

  32. [32]

      Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Redfern, P. C.; Curtiss, L. A.; Amine, K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8204. doi: 10.1039/C2EE21977H

  33. [33]

      Huang, J.; Cheng, L.; Assary, R. S.; Wang, P.; Xue, Z.; Burrell, A. K.; Curtiss, L. A.; Zhang, L. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401782. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401782

  34. [34]

      Sevov, C. S.; Samaroo, S. K.; Sanford, M. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602027. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602027

  35. [35]

      Yan, Y.; Robinson, S. G.; Sigman, M. S.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 15301. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07345

  36. [36]

      Robinson, S. G.; Yan, Y.; Hendriks, K. H.; Sanford, M. S.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10171. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04270

  37. [37]

      Shrestha, A.; Hendriks, K. H.; Sigman, M. S.; Minteer, S. D.; Sanford, M. S. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 5369. doi: 10.1002/chem.202000749

  38. [38]

      Cong, G.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Lu, Y. C. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 869. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00115

  39. [39]

      Wang, Y.; Zhou, H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2267. doi: 10.1039/C6EE00902F

  40. [40]

      Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Ding, Y.; Guo, X.; Yu, G. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2875. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01899

  41. [41]

      Zhang, C.; Qian, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Guo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7045. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902433

  42. [42]

      Goeltz, J. C.; Matsushima, L. N. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 9983. doi: 10.1039/C7CC04837H

  43. [43]

      Sinclair, N. S.; Poe, D.; Savinell, R. F.; Maginn, E. J.; Wainright, J. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 020527. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/abe28a

  44. [44]

      Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; Qian, Y.; Dai, G.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, G. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2008560. doi: 10.1002/adma.202008560

  45. [45]

      Zhang, C.; Niu, Z.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, G. Chem 2018, 4, 2814. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.024

  46. [46]

      Takechi, K.; Kato, Y.; Hase, Y. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2501. doi: 10.1002/adma.201405840

  47. [47]

      Cong, G.; Lu, Y. C. Chem 2018, 4, 2732. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.018

  48. [48]

      Duduta, M.; Ho, B.; Wood, V. C.; Limthongkul, P.; Brunini, V. E.; Carter, W. C.; Chiang, Y. M. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 511. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100152

  49. [49]

      Chen, H.; Zou, Q.; Liang, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Lu, Y. C. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5877. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6877

  50. [50]

      Chen, H.; Lu, Y. C. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502183. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201502183

  51. [51]

      Chen, H.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, Y. C. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1991. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01257

  52. [52]

      Zhang, X.; Zhang, P.; Chen, H. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1913. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202100094

  53. [53]

      Wang, Q.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Wang, D.; Exnar, I.; Grätzel, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8197. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602891

  54. [54]

      Jia, C.; Pan, F.; Zhu, Y. G.; Huang, Q.; Lu, L.; Wang, Q. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500886. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500886

  55. [55]

      Huang, Q.; Yang, J.; Ng, C. B.; Jia, C.; Wang, Q. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 917. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03764F

  56. [56]

      Yan, R.; Wang, Q. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802406. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802406

  57. [57]

      Yu, J.; Fan, L.; Yan, R.; Zhou, M.; Wang, Q. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2314. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01420

  58. [58]

      Chen, Y.; Zhou, M.; Xia, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, S.; Qin, W.; et al. Joule 2019, 3, 2255. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.007

  59. [59]

      Cheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.; Samarakoon, W.; Xi, S.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Du, Y.; Feng, Z.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 3028. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01939

  60. [60]

      Zhou, M.; Chen, Y.; Salla, M.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Mothe, S. R.; Wang, Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14286. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004603

  61. [61]

      Huang, Q.; Li, H.; Grätzel, M.; Wang, Q. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 1793. doi: 10.1039/C2CP44466F

  62. [62]

      Zhou, M.; Huang, Q.; Pham Truong, T. N.; Ghilane, J.; Zhu, Y. G.; Jia, C.; Yan, R.; Fan, L.; Randriamahazaka, H.; Wang, Q. Chem 2017, 3, 1036. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.003

  63. [63]

      Kwon, G.; Lee, S.; Hwang, J.; Shim, H. S.; Lee, B.; Lee, M. H.; Ko, Y.; Jung, S. K.; Ku, K.; Hong, J.; Kang, K. Joule 2018, 2, 1771. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.014

  64. [64]

      Li, Z.; Lu, Y. C. Chem 2018, 4, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.032

  65. [65]

      Kwon, G.; Lee, K.; Lee, M. H.; Lee, B.; Lee, S.; Jung, S. K.; Ku, K.; Kim, J.; Park, S. Y.; Kwon, J. E.; et al. Chem 2019, 5, 2642. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.006

  66. [66]

      Ham, Y.; Ri, V.; Kim, J.; Yoon, Y.; Lee, J.; Kang, K.; An, K. S.; Kim, C.; Jeon, S. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 1382. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-3187-9

  67. [67]

      Lee, M.; Hong, J.; Lee, B.; Ku, K.; Lee, S.; Park, C. B.; Kang, K. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2980. doi: 10.1039/C7GC00849J

  68. [68]

      Lee, S.; Lee, K.; Ku, K.; Hong, J.; Park, S. Y.; Kwon, J. E.; Kang, K. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001635. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202001635

  69. [69]

      Attanayake, N. H.; Kowalski, J. A.; Greco, K. V.; Casselman, M. D.; Milshtein, J. D.; Chapman, S. J.; Parkin, S. R.; Brushett, F. R.; Odom, S. A. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 4353. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04770

  70. [70]

      Kowalski, J. A.; Casselman, M. D.; Kaur, A. P.; Milshtein, J. D.; Elliott, C. F.; Modekrutti, S.; Attanayake, N. H.; Zhang, N.; Parkin, S. R.; Risko, C.; et al. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24371. doi: 10.1039/C7TA05883G

•