English

Formic Acid Electro-Oxidation Catalyzed by PdNi/Graphene Aerogel

• Bao Yufei ,
• Feng Ligang ^,

• School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu Province, China

Corresponding author: Feng Ligang, ligang.feng@yzu.edu.cn

• Received Date: 13 August 2020
  Accepted Date: 08 September 2020
  Revised Date: 08 September 2020
  Available Online: 15 September 2021
• Fund Project:

  The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21972124, 21603041)

Abstract: Direct formic acid fuel cells involve two significant half-reactions, namely formic acid electro-oxidation and oxygen reduction reaction, and the more sluggish and complex process for anode formic acid oxide also determine the whole fuel cells energy conversion efficiency. The most efficient catalysts rely on the noble metal of Pt and Pd based catalysts and compared with Pt catalysts, Pd catalyst is more appealing because of the low CO poisoning effect during the electro-oxidation of formic acid that mainly follows the direct pathway. The Pd alloy effect and support effect should be considered for the catalyst fabrication since the resulted structure and electronic modification could largely increase the catalytic performance. Graphene emerges out as novel support while the easy agglomeration and destruction of pure graphene do not guarantee promising merits. In this work, we demonstrated the formic acid oxidation ability boosting by facile coupling PdNi alloy and 3D graphene aerogel (PdNi/GA) via a freezing-drying/thermal annealing reduction approach. The PdNi alloy crystal structure was well confirmed by the X-ray diffractions technique and the alloy nanoparticles were successfully anchored on the 3D graphene aerogel surface. The electrochemical performance was evaluated for formic acid oxidation in the acid electrolyte. The PdNi/GA catalyst displayed a larger peak current density of 136 mA·cm^-2, which was 2 and 3.45 times greater than Pd/GA (68 mA·cm^-2) and Pd/C (39.4 mA·cm^-2), respectively. The anti-CO poisoning ability was measured by CO stripping technique, and a low onset potential of 0.49 V was found on PdNi/GA catalyst, about 120 mV less than that of Pd/GA catalyst, indicating the oxophilic property of Ni to assist formic acid oxidation via the bi-functional mechanism. The oxidation peak potential of 0.67 V was observed on PdNi/GA, about 40 mV less than that of Pd/C catalyst, indicating the merits of 3D structure of graphene. Moreover, PdNi/GA catalyst had the highest mass activity of 1699 mA·mg^-1 compared to Pd/GA (851 mA·mg^-1) and Pd/C (537 mA·mg^-1) catalysts. The specific activity of PdNi/GA was 2.6 mA·cm^-2, which was 1.94 and 2.7 times of Pd/GA (1.34 mA·cm^-2) and Pd/C (0.96 mA·cm^-2) catalysts. The highly improved catalytic performance could be due to the combined alloy and support effect. The PdNi/GA was a promising catalyst for application in the direct formic acid fuel cells.

Key words:
• Formic acid oxidation reaction
•  /  Direct formic acid fuel cell
•  /  Electrocatalyst
•  /  Pd-base catalyst
•  /  Graphene aerogel

• 1. [1]

     Feng, L.; Chang, J.; Jiang, K.; Xue, H.; Liu, C.; Cai, W. B.; Xing, W.; Zhang, J. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 355. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.023

  2. [2]

     Ong, B. C.; Kamarudin, S. K.; Basri, S. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 10142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.117

  3. [3]

     杨金龙.物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 2003010. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202003010Yang, J. L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 2003010. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202003010

  4. [4]

     吕洋, 宋玉江, 刘会园, 李焕巧.物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611071Lü, Y.; Song, Y. J.; Liu, H. Y.; Li, H. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611071

  5. [5]

     李庆武, 魏子栋, 陈四国, 齐学强, 柳晓, 丁炜, 马宇.物理化学学报, 2011, 27, 2857. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20112857Li, Q. W.; Wei, Z. D.; Chen, S. G.; Qi, X. Q.; Liu, X.; Ding, W.; Ma, Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27, 2857. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20112857

  6. [6]

     Hu, S.; Che, F.; Khorasani, B.; Jeon, M.; Yoon, C. W.; McEwen, J. S.; Scudiero, L.; Ha, S. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 254, 685. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.072

  7. [7]

     Romero Hernández, A.; Arce Estrada, E. M.; Ezeta, A.; Manríquez, M. E. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 327, 134977. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134977

  8. [8]

     方波, 冯立纲.物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905023Fang, B.; Feng, L. G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905023

  9. [9]

     Wang, F.; Xue, H.; Tian, Z.; Xing, W.; Feng, L. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.055

  10. [10]

      Jiang, K.; Zhang, H. X.; Zou, S.; Cai, W. B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20360. doi: 10.1039/C4CP03151B

  11. [11]

      Liu, H.; Yang, D.; Bao, Y.; Yu, X.; Feng, L. J. Power Sources 2019, 434, 226754. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226754

  12. [12]

      Bao, Y.; Wang, F.; Gu, X.; Feng, L. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 18866. doi: 10.1039/C9NR07158J

  13. [13]

      Bin, D.; Yang, B.; Ren, F.; Zhang, K.; Yang, P.; Du, Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 14001. doi: 10.1039/C5TA02829A

  14. [14]

      Chen, W.; Xue, J.; Bao, Y.; Feng, L. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122752. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122752

  15. [15]

      Zhang, X.; Zhu, J.; Tiwary, C. S.; Ma, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Z.; Huang, W.; Wu, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10858. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b01580

  16. [16]

      Siller-Ceniceros, A. A.; Sánchez-Castro, M. E.; Morales-Acosta, D.; Torres-Lubian, J. R.; Martínez G, E.; Rodríguez-Varela, F. J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 209, 455. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.023

  17. [17]

      Tzorbatzoglou, F.; Brouzgou, A.; Jing, S.; Wang, Y.; Song, S.; Tsiakaras, P. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 11766. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.071

  18. [18]

      Perivoliotis, D. K.; Tagmatarchis, N. Carbon 2017, 118, 493. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.073

  19. [19]

      Zhang, H.; Zhai, C.; Gao, H.; Fu, N.; Zhu, M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 547, 102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.090

  20. [20]

      Zhang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Wu, D.; Li, Z.; Li, Q.; Zheng, L.; Chen, W.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, L. Y. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 2731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.004

  21. [21]

      Kotal, M.; Kim, J.; Oh, J.; Oh, I. K. Front. Mater. 2016, 3. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2016.00029

  22. [22]

      Zhang, X.; Han, Y.; Huang, L.; Dong, S. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 3049. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600904

  23. [23]

      Zhao, L.; Wang, Z. B.; Li, J. L.; Zhang, J. J.; Sui, X. L.; Zhang, L. M. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 189, 175. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.072

  24. [24]

      Zhang, X.; Hao, N.; Dong, X.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, K. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69973. doi: 10.1039/C6RA12562J

  25. [25]

      Xia, W.; Qu, C.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, B.; Dai, S.; Qiu, B.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, X.; Guo, W.; et al. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2788. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05004

  26. [26]

      Fu, G.; Yan, X.; Chen, Y.; Xu, L.; Sun, D.; Lee, J. M.; Tang, Y. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704609. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704609

  27. [27]

      Çögenli, M. S.; Ayşe, B. Y. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 075513. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/aad0e8

  28. [28]

      Çögenli, M. S.; Bayrakçeken Yurtcan, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 650. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.226

  29. [29]

      Zhao, S.; Yin, H.; Du, L.; Yin, G.; Tang, Z.; Liu, S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3719. doi: 10.1039/C3TA14809B

  30. [30]

      Wang, F.; Yu, H.; Tian, Z.; Xue, H.; Feng, L. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27, 395. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.12.011

  31. [31]

      Bao, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, F.; Feng, L. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 274, 119106. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119106

  32. [32]

      Sun, L.; Liao, B.; Ren, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Deng, L.; Gao, Y. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 235, 543. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.159

  33. [33]

      Lohrasbi, E.; Javanbakht, M.; Mozaffari, S. A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 9154. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00980

  34. [34]

      Pei, C.; Ding, R.; Yu, X.; Feng, L. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 4617. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201900886

  35. [35]

      Lim, E. J.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, W. B. Catal. Commun. 2012, 25, 74. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2012.04.011

  36. [36]

      Xu, C.; Liu, Y.; Hao, Q.; Duan, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13542. doi: 10.1039/C3TA12765F

  37. [37]

      Wang, Y.; He, Q.; Wei, H.; Guo, J.; Ding, K.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Wei, S.; Guo, Z. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 184, 452. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.046

  38. [38]

      Lebedeva, N. P.; Koper, M. T. M.; Feliu, J. M.; van Santen, R. A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 524–525, 242. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)00669-1

  39. [39]

      Seland, F.; Tunold, R.; Harrington, D. A. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 6851. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.021

  40. [40]

      Li, S.; Dong, Z.; Yang, H.; Guo, S.; Gou, G.; Ren, R.; Zhu, Z.; Jin, J.; Ma, J. Chem. Euro. J. 2013, 19, 2384. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203686

•