氧化石墨阳离子交换容量测定过程中结构的变化

引用本文: 王泉珺, 孙红娟, 彭同江, 冯明珠. 氧化石墨阳离子交换容量测定过程中结构的变化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(2): 413-418. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201610241 shu

Citation: WANG Quan-Jun, SUN Hong-Juan, PENG Tong-Jiang, FENG Ming-Zhu. Structure Development during the Cation Exchange Processes of Graphite Oxide[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(2): 413-418. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201610241 shu

氧化石墨阳离子交换容量测定过程中结构的变化

1.
西南科技大学理学院, 四川绵阳 621010;
2.
西南科技大学矿物材料及应用研究所, 四川绵阳 621010;
3.
西南科技大学分析测试中心, 四川绵阳 621010
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金（41272051），西南科技大学博士基金（11ZX7135）及西南科技大学研究生创新基金（15ycx073）资助项目

摘要: 氧化石墨（GO）结构层上的碳羟基（-C-OH）和边缘羧基（-COOH）在水介质中发生质子化反应解离出的H⁺具有阳离子可交换性。实验采用甲醛缩合法测量了GO的阳离子交换容量（CEC），用X射线衍射（XRD）、傅里叶变换红外（FTIR）光谱和X射线光电子能谱（XPS）分析测试手段对GO阳离子交换过程中间产物的结构变化进行了分析。结果表明，GO的CEC高达541.48 mmol/100 g。NH₄⁺和Ca²⁺交换后的GO，保持稳定的层状结构，c轴方向层间距分别增大了0.1499和0.2905 nm。NH₄⁺和Ca²⁺主要以层间可交换阳离子形式存在于层间域中，并与水分子形成可交换水化阳离子层，部分以[NH₄（H₂O）₆]⁺和[Ca（H₂O）₆]²⁺的形式存在于结构层的边缘附近，共同平衡结构层水解产生的负电荷。

关键词:

English

Structure Development during the Cation Exchange Processes of Graphite Oxide

1.
School of Science, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan Province, P. R. China;
2.
Institute of Mineral Materials & Application, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan Province, P. R. China;
3.
Center of Forecasting and Analysis, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan Province, P. R. China
Received Date: 26 August 2016
Revised Date: 24 October 2016
Fund Project:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272051), Doctor Foundation of Southwest University of Science and Technology, China (11ZX7135), and Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project by Southwest University of Science and Technology, China (15ycx073).

Abstract: Oxygen-containing hydroxyl (-C-OH) and carboxyl (-COOH) functional groups on both the basal planes and edges of the graphite oxide (GO) structure can dissociate to form H+ in water, thus providing cation exchange ability. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of GO was measured accurately using the Stiasny method and the intermediate products of cation exchange processes of oxygen-containing functional groups and structure development were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results indicated that the CEC of GO was up to 541.48 mmol/100 g. After NH₄⁺ and Ca²⁺ exchange processes, GO still maintained a stable lamellar structure, and the c axis spacing increased by 0.1499 and 0.2905 nm, respectively. NH₄⁺ and Ca²⁺ were mainly in the form of exchangeable cations in the interlayer space of GO, and formed a hydrated cation layer with water molecules, part of the containing[NH₄(H₂O)₆]⁺ or[Ca(H₂O)₆]²⁺ formed near the edge of the structural layer, balancing the negative charges originating from hydrolysis of the carboxyl groups of the GO structural layer.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Hadi, J.; Tournassat, C.; Lerouge, C. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 119, 393. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.017
2. [2]
  Sharma, A.; Weindorf, D. C.; Wang, D.; Chakraborty, S. Geoderma 2015, 239, 130. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.10.001
3. [3]
  Jiang, Y.; Lu, J.; Sun, K.; Ma, L.; Ding, J. Energy Convers. Manage. 2013, 76, 980. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.011
4. [4]
  Feng, M. Z.; Peng, T. J.; Sun, H. J.; Wang, P. C. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 32 (3), 427. [冯明珠, 彭同江, 孙红娟, 王培草. 无机化学学报, 2016, 32 (3), 427.] doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2016.047
5. [5]
  Szabó, T.; Berkesi, O.; Forgó, P.; Josepovits, K.; Sanakis, Y.; Petridis, D.; Dékány, I. Chem Mater 2006, 18 (11), 2740. doi: 10.1021/cm060258+
6. [6]
  Peng, T. J.; Liu, F. S.; Huang, J.; Belzile, N.; Sun, H. J. Acta Petrologica et Minerallogica 2003, 22 (4), 391. [彭同江, 刘福生, Huang, J., Belzile, N., 孙红娟. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2003, 22(4), 391.]
7. [7]
  Iturri, L. A.; Buschiazzo, D. E. Catena 2014, 121, 81. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.021
8. [8]
  Vazquez, A.; López, M.; Kortaberria, G.; Martín, L.; Mondragon, I. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 41 (1), 24. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2007.10.001
9. [9]
  Ma, C.; Eggleton, R. A. Clay Clay Min. 1999, 47 (2), 174.
10. [10]
  Chakrabarti, A.; Sharma, M. React. Polym. 1993, 20 (1), 1. doi: 10.1016/0923-1137(93)90064-M
11. [11]
  Millar, G. J.; Miller, G. L.; Couperthwaite, S. J.; Papworth, S. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 163, 79. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.02.045
12. [12]
  Amin, N.; Abdelwahab, O.; El-Ashtoukhy, E. S. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55 (1), 199. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.913208
13. [13]
  Hofmann, U.; Holst, R. Berichte Der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 2006, 72 (4), 754. doi: 10.1002/cber.19390720417
14. [14]
  Clause, A.; Plass, R.; Boehm, H. P.; Hofmann, U. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1957, 291 (5－6), 205. doi: 10.1002/zaac.19572910502
15. [15]
  Dimiev, A.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Alemany, L. B.; Chaguine, P.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (5), 2815. doi: 10.1021/ja211531y
16. [16]
  Boukhvalov, D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118 (47), 27594. doi: 10.1021/jp509659p
17. [17]
  Hontoria-Lucas, C.; Lopez-Peinado, A.; López-González, J. D.D.; Rojas-Cervantes, M.; Martin-Aranda, R. Carbon 1995, 33(11), 1585. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00120-3
18. [18]
  Liu, Z. H.; Wang, Z. M.; Yang, X.; Ooi, K. Langmuir 2002, 18(12), 4926. doi: 10.1021/la011677i
19. [19]
  Liu, P.; Gong, K.; Xiao, P.; Xiao, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10(10), 933. doi: 10.1039/A908179H
20. [20]
  Sun, H. J.; Peng, T. J. Graphene Materials Prepared by Oxidation-Reduction Method from Graphite; Science Press:Beijing, 2015; pp 52－79. [孙红娟, 彭同江. 石墨氧化-还原法制备石墨烯材料. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 52－79.]
21. [21]
  Rozada, R.; Paredes, J. I.; López, M. J.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Cabria, I.; Alonso, J. A.; Martínez-Alonso, A.; Tascón, J. M. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (6), 2374. doi: 10.1039/c4nr05816j
22. [22]
  Volkov, A. G.; Paula, S.; Deamer, D. W. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1997, 42 (2), 153. doi: 10.1016/S0302-4598(96)05097-0
23. [23]
  Huang, Q.; Sun, H. J.; Yang, Y. H. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 27 (9), 1721. [黄桥, 孙红娟, 杨勇辉. 无机化学学报, 2011, 27 (9), 1721.]
24. [24]
  Lee, D.; De Los Santos V, L.; Seo, J.; Felix, L. L.; Bustamante D. A.; Cole, J.; Barnes, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114 (17), 5723. doi: 10.1021/jp1002275
25. [25]
  Ganguly, A.; Sharma, S.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Hamilton, J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115 (34), 17009. doi: 10.1021/jp203741y

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 5
文章访问数: 927
HTML全文浏览量: 95

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

氧化石墨阳离子交换容量测定过程中结构的变化

English

Structure Development during the Cation Exchange Processes of Graphite Oxide

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

氧化石墨阳离子交换容量测定过程中结构的变化

English

Structure Development during the Cation Exchange Processes of Graphite Oxide

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs