Cu(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅰ) complexes based on derivatives of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine: Synthesis, structures, in situ metal-ligand reactions, and catalytic activity

Bofei JIA Zhihao LIU Zongyuan GAO Shuai ZHOU Mengxiang WU Qian ZHANG Xiamei ZHANG Shuzhong CHEN Xiaohan YANG Yahong LI

Citation:  Bofei JIA, Zhihao LIU, Zongyuan GAO, Shuai ZHOU, Mengxiang WU, Qian ZHANG, Xiamei ZHANG, Shuzhong CHEN, Xiaohan YANG, Yahong LI. Cu(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅰ) complexes based on derivatives of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine: Synthesis, structures, in situ metal-ligand reactions, and catalytic activity[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(5): 1020-1036. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240317 shu

基于咪唑并[1,5-a]吡啶衍生物配体的Cu(Ⅱ)和Cu(Ⅰ)配合物的合成、结构、原位金属-配体反应及催化性能

    通讯作者: 李亚红, liyahong@suda.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金 22171198

    国家自然科学基金 21772140

    苏州大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目 202410285046Z

    苏州市基础科技项目 SZS201905

摘要: 发展了3种高效合成一系列基于咪唑并[1,5-a]吡啶衍生物配体的Cu(Ⅱ)和Cu(Ⅰ)配合物的方法: (ⅰ)使用CuCu(Ⅱ)盐作为金属源, N, N-二甲基甲酰胺作为溶剂与还原剂生成Cu(Ⅰ)配合物; (ⅱ)使用含碘化合物作为配体和碘源, 诱导原位金属-配体反应生成碘桥联铜配合物; (ⅲ)在反应体系中加入一系列醛使之与咪唑并[1,5-a]吡啶衍生物进行原位金属-配体反应, 获得多齿配体支架。我们制备了8种配合物, 对其结构进行了表征, 并研究了这些配合物对乙二醇缩酮化反应的催化活性。除配合物4外, 其余7个配合物均表现出较高的催化活性。配合物4的催化活性较低可能是由于桥接碘离子的半径较大以及Cu(Ⅰ)…Cu(Ⅰ)距离较短所引起的。

English

  • As an inexpensive and earth-abundant metal, copper plays a central role in coordination chemistry. This advantage originates from the widespread application of copper complexes in life sciences[1-5], catalytic reactions[6-8], magnetism[9-10], and photoluminescent materials[11-15]. It is well known that ligand environments influence the properties of copper complexes[16]. Therefore, much effort has been dedicated to designing ligands for adjusting the properties of the complexes of copper.

    Imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine has recently attracted some attention. It is an important scaffold found in a range of natural and pharmaceutical products[17-18]. Heterocycles containing imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine moiety have a myriad of applications in organic materials, e.g., OLEDs[19], organic thin-layer field-effect transistors (FETs)[20], and organic electronics[21]. Imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine and its derivatives also act as nitrogen-containing ligands for preparing complexes[22-30]. In particular, a variety of substituents can be introduced at the 1- or 3-position of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine, leading to the formation of a series of targeting imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-based ligands[31-34]. Among these compounds, 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (L1) has emerged as an attractive ligand due to its ability to serve as a bidentate nitrogen donor ligand. There are several complexes, including Ni(Ⅱ)[35], Zn(Ⅱ)[36], V(Ⅴ)[37], Mn(Ⅱ)[38], Re(Ⅰ)[39-40], and Ir(Ⅲ)[41], that use L1 as ligands. However, complexes of Cu(Ⅱ) or Cu(Ⅰ) ions that employ L1 and its derivatives as ligands are still very rare[42-43].

    Considering that the complexes of copper are very important in many fields, in the present work, we employed L1 and its derivative 1-iodo-3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (L2) as ligands to obtain differently structured Cu(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅰ) complexes. Five complexes, [Cu2(L1)2Cl4]·2CH2Cl2 (1·2CH2Cl2), [Cu(L1)2Br][CuBr2] (2), [Cu(L1)2]ClO4 (3), [Cu2(L2)2I2] (4), and [Cu(L2)2(ClO4)]ClO4 (5), were prepared. In particular, in situ cleavage of the C—I bond under solvothermal conditions occurred during the formation of 4. Moreover, by adding different aldehydes to a reaction system of CuCl2·2H2O and the L1 ligand, in situ metal-ligand reactions occurred, and complexes [Cu(L3)Cl][CuCl2] (6), [Cu(L4)Cl][Cu2(L1)2Cl4]0.5[CuCl2] (7), and [Cu(L5)Cl]Cl·EtOH (8·EtOH) (L3=1, 1′-(phenylmethylene)bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine}, L4=1, 1′-{[4-(diethoxymethyl)phenyl] methylene}bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine}, L5=4-(bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridin-1-yl}methyl)-2-methoxy-phenol) were obtained. The catalytic properties of 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-7, and 8·EtOH were investigated. Herein, we present the synthesis, structures, and catalytic activity of these eight complexes.

    All solvents and reagents were purchased from chemical suppliers and used directly without further purification. The ligands L1 and L2 were synthesized following a procedure reported in the literature[31,43]. The elemental analyses of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen were carried out using a Perkin-Elmer 2400 micro analyzer. The infrared data were obtained on a Bruker Tensor 27 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer.

    A long Pyrex tube (10 mL, 20 cm) charged with a solution of the L1 ligand (0.019 6 g, 0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) was layered with a solution of CuCl2·2H2O (0.017 0 g, 0.1 mmol) in EtOH (2.0 mL). Then, the Pyrex tube was sealed with Parafilm. Blue crystals formed at the interface of CH2Cl2 and EtOH after the tube was allowed to stand still for 3 d. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.022 g (71%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C24H18Cl4Cu2N6 (1)(%): C, 43.72; H, 2.75; N, 12.79. Found(%): C, 43.56; H, 2.78; N, 12.78. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 598 (w), 1 477 (m), 1 363 (w), 1 302 (w), 1 250 (m), 1 167 (w), 1 144 (w), 1 055 (w), 1 007 (w), 986 (w), 914 (w), 835 (w), 779 (s), 746 (m), 675 (s), 642 (w).

    A mixture of MeOH (1.0 mL), the L1 ligand (0.019 9 g, 0.1 mmol), acetic acid (1.0 mL), and CuBr2 (0.112 g, 0.05 mmol) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 120 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave dark green lumpy crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.026 g (70%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C24H18Br3Cu2N6(%): C, 38.07; H, 2.40; N, 11.10. Found(%): C, 38.68; N, 10.68; H, 1.79. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 601 (m), 1 481 (s), 1 411 (w), 1 371 (m), 1 311 (m), 1 249 (m), 1 146 (m), 1 053 (m), 1 009 (m), 984 (w), 916 (w), 858 (w), 824 (w), 781 (s), 737 (s), 677 (s), 638 (m).

    A mixture of EtOH (2.0 mL), the L1 ligand (0.019 5 g, 0.1 mmol), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 1.0 mL), and Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.017 0 g, 0.1 mmol) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 90 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave red crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.039 g (70%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C24H18ClCuN6O4(%): C, 52.09; H, 3.28; N, 15.19. Found(%): C, 51.95; H, 3.21; N, 15.03. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 597 (s), 1 466 (s), 1 364 (m), 1 302 (w), 1 252 (m), 1 144 (w), 1 054 (w), 1 004 (m), 979 (m), 910 (w), 834 (m), 799 (m), 776 (s), 742 (s), 719 (w), 678 (s), 638 (m).

    A mixture of MeOH (2.0 mL), the L2 ligand (0.016 g, 0.05 mmol), CuCl2·2H2O (0.008 5 g, 0.05 mmol), and DMF (0.1 mL) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 90 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave orange block-like crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.015 g (60%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C24H16 Cu2I4N6(%): C, 28.17; H, 1.58; N, 8.21. Found(%): C, 28.69; H, 1.58; N, 8.35. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 593 (m), 1 470 (s), 1 359 (m), 1 259 (m), 1 160 (w), 1 150 (w), 1 019 (w), 781 (m), 772 (w), 732 (s), 673 (w).

    A mixture of EtOH (2.0 mL), the L2 ligand (0.016 g, 0.05 mmol), and Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.018 5 g, 0.05 mmol) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 90 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave orange block-like crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.025 g (55%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C24H17Cl2CuI2N6O8(%): C, 31.83; H, 1.89; N, 9.28. Found(%): C, 31.98; H, 1.70; N, 9.21. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 2 988 (w), 2 902 (w), 1 606 (w), 1 478 (s), 1 362 (w), 1 249 (w), 1 094 (m), 1 080 (s), 1 019 (w), 915 (w), 774 (s), 741 (m), 671 (m), 649 (m), 620 (s).

    A mixture of MeOH (2.0 mL), the L1 ligand (0.019 5 g, 0.1 mmol), CuCl2·2H2O (0.017 0 g, 0.1 mmol), and benzaldehyde (0.5 mL) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 90 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave green flaky crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.016 g (46%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C31H22Cl3 Cu2N6(%): C, 52.30; H, 3.11; N, 11.80. Found(%): C, 52.50; H, 3.11; N, 11.88. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 596 (m), 1 487 (s), 1 463 (m), 1 427 (w), 1 361 (m), 1 308 (m), 1 272 (m), 1 246 (s), 1 227 (m), 1 186 (w), 1 135 (w), 1 065 (m), 1 004 (m), 963 (w), 832 (m), 773 (s), 748 (s), 708 (s), 685 (s), 640 (w), 622 (m), 607 (w).

    A mixture of EtOH (2.0 mL), the L1 ligand (0.009 8 g, 0.05 mmol), p-phenylenedicarboxaldehyde (0.006 7 g, 0.05 mmol), and CuCl2·2H2O (0.008 5 g, 0.05 mmol) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 110 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave green lumpy crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.004 0 g (21%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C48H41Cl5Cu3N9O2(%): C, 50.40; H, 3.61; N, 11.02. Found(%): C, 49.83; H, 3.59; N, 10.88. The selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1 603 (m), 1 486 (s), 1 365 (m), 1 311 (s), 1 246 (m), 1 086 (s), 1 042 (s), 1 007 (m), 969 (m), 823 (m), 770 (s), 729 (s), 694 (s), 668 (s).

    A mixture of EtOH (2.0 mL), the L1 ligand (0.019 5 g, 0.1 mmol), CuCl2·2H2O (0.008 5 g, 0.05 mmol), and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde (0.007 5 g, 0.05 mmol) was loaded into a Pyrex tube (6.0 mL). The tube was sealed and sonicated for 10 min to obtain a homogenous solution. Then, the tube was heated at 110 ℃ for 3 d under autogenous pressure. Cooling of the tube to room temperature for 24 h gave green lumpy crystals. The crystals were collected, washed with EtOH, and dried in air. The yield was 0.017 g (53%). Elemental analysis Calcd. for C34H29Cl2CuN6O3(%): C, 58.00; H, 4.15; N, 11.94. Found(%): C, 57.59; H, 3.87; N, 11.67. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 3 084 (w), 3 032 (w), 2 964 (w), 1 596 (m), 1 517 (w), 1 485 (s), 1 461 (m), 1 353 (m), 1 309 (m), 1 277 (m), 1 239 (s), 1 213 (m), 1 146 (m), 1 128 (s), 1 055 (m), 1 029 (m), 1 006 (m), 812 (s), 760 (s), 710 (w), 666 (s), 625 (m).

    Ketone (0.7 mmol), ethylene glycol (0.7 mmol), toluene (0.5 mL), 4A molecular sieves (2.0 mg), and catalyst (2.0 mg) were added to a 10 mL Schlenk flask. The reaction was refluxed at 110 ℃ for 24 h. The catalyst and the molecular sieves were isolated by filtration. All product yields were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig.S17-S48, Supporting information).

    The single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for eight complexes were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated Mo (λ=0.071 073 nm) using the φ-ω scan technique. The crystal structures were solved with the Olex2 program with the ShelXL refinement package[44-45]. The refinement details and selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table S1-S16.

    We investigated the synthesis of a complex of 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (L1) by using inexpensive CuCl2·2H2O as a starting material under atmospheric pressure at room temperature (Scheme 1). We first added a solution of L1 (in ethanol) to a Pyrex glass tube and then layered a solution of CuCl2·2H2O in CH2Cl2 on top of the solution of L1. Blue crystals of [Cu2(L1)2Cl4]·2CH2Cl2 (1·2CH2Cl2) were obtained after the glass tube was allowed to stand still on the bench for one week.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthesis of complexes 1-3

    After the successful synthesis of 1·2CH2Cl2, we next attempted to synthesize a bromide-bridged complex by employing CuBr2 as a Cu(Ⅱ) source. Our efforts to prepare the complex of CuBr2 by a method similar to that of preparing 1·2CH2Cl2 were in vain. Then, the reaction was conducted under solvothermal conditions, and complex [Cu(L1)2Br][CuBr2] (2) was generated.

    The reaction of Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O and the L1 ligand in a solvent mixture of EtOH and DMF under solvothermal conditions was also conducted, and a homoleptic complex [Cu(L1)2]ClO4 (3) was prepared.

    A remarkable feature of the synthesis of 1·2CH2Cl2, 2, and 3 is that three complexes with completely different structures were formed by using different metal salts. These results inspired us to examine whether we could prepare structurally different complexes by using a derivative of L1, 1-iodo-3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (L2), as a ligand and different copper salts as metal sources. As shown in Scheme 2, the reactions of L2 with CuCl2·2H2O and Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O gave complexes [Cu2(L2)2I2] (4) and [Cu(L2)2(ClO4)]ClO4 (5), respectively.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  Synthesis of complexes 4 and 5

    Motivated by our previous work showing that in situ metal-ligand reactions occurred in the reaction of FeCl3, L1, and picolinaldehyde[31], we explored the in situ metal-ligand reactions of CuCl2·2H2O, L1, and other aldehydes. To this end, the reactions of CuCl2·2H2O, L1, and benzaldehyde/terephthalaldehyde/4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde, were conducted (Scheme 3). To our delight, three new complexes, [Cu(L3)Cl][CuCl2] (6), [Cu(L4)Cl][Cu2(L1)2Cl4]0.5[CuCl2] (7), and [Cu(L5)Cl]Cl·EtOH (8·EtOH), were formed. In situ metal-ligand reactions occurred, generating three new ligands, L3, L4 and L5, where L3=1, 1′-(phenylmethylene)bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine}, L4=1, 1′-{[4-(diethoxymethyl)phenyl] methylene}bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine}, and L5=4-(bis{3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridin-1-yl}methyl)-2-methoxy-phenol.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Synthesis of complexes 6, 7, and 8·EtOH

    The structure of 1·2CH2Cl2 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Complex 1·2CH2Cl2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1. The crystal structure of 1·2CH2Cl2 is composed of two Cu(Ⅱ) ions, two L1 ligands, four Cl- ions, and two CH2Cl2 molecules (Fig. 1a). The complex 1·2CH2Cl2 has a crystallographically imposed C2 symmetry; thus, there is one crystallographically independent Cu(Ⅱ) ion. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion is bound to two nitrogen atoms from the L1 ligand, two bridging chloride ions, and one terminal coordinated chloride ion. The two Cu(Ⅱ) ions are doubly bridged by two chloride ions to form a Cu2Cl2 rhombic ring. The Cu(Ⅱ)…Cu(Ⅱ) distance is 0.342 7 nm, and the bond lengths of Cu1—N1, Cu1—N2, Cu1—Cl1, Cu1—Cl2, and Cu1—Cl2#1 are 0.198 2(3), 0.206 0(3), 0.224 11(9), 0.230 60(8), and 0.264 33(9) nm, respectively.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 1·2CH2Cl2 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 1·2CH2Cl2; (c) Packing diagram of 1·2CH2Cl2 viewed along the b-axis

    The hydrogen atoms and solvent (CH2Cl2) molecules are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, -y, 1-z.

    The CShM method (SHAPE 2.0 software program)[46] was used to analyze the geometry of the Cu(Ⅱ) ion in 1·2CH2Cl2 (Table S17). The minimum CShM values for the different geometries show that the Cu(Ⅱ) ion displays a square pyramid geometry with a minimum CShM value of 1.225.

    A detailed structural analysis of 1·2CH2Cl2 reveals that ππ stacking interactions exist among the pyridine ring of one molecule and the pyridyl moiety of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine motif in another molecule [Fig. 1b, the Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.362 1(2) nm]. Fig. 1c shows the packing diagram of 1·2CH2Cl2 viewed along the b-axis. This packing structure is stabilized by the ππ stacking interactions.

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis shows that complex 2 crystallizes in the triclinic C2/c space group. The molecular structure of 2 consists of [Cu(L1)2Br] and [CuBr2] units. The valence state balance requirement revealed that the copper ion in the [Cu(L1)2Br] unit is in the +2 valence state and that the other copper ion in the [CuBr2] unit is in the +1 valence state. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the two L1 ligands and a bromide ion (Fig. 2). Thus, the five-coordinate Cu1 ion exhibits a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with a minimum CShM value of 1.752[46] (Table S17). The Cu1—Br1, Cu1—N2, and Cu1—N1 bond lengths are 0.245 01(8), 0.195 8(3), and 0.211 5(3) nm, respectively.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 2 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 2; (c) Packing diagram of 2 viewed along the a-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, y, 3/2-z.

    It is found that there are ππ stacking interactions among the pyridine ring of one molecule and the pyridyl motif of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine scaffold in another molecule [Fig. 2b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.356 52(2) nm]. Fig. 2c presents the packing diagram of 2 viewed along the a-axis. In turn, the packing network is stabilized by the ππ stacking interactions.

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis demonstrates that complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure of 3 consists of a [Cu(L1)2]+ cation and a ClO4- anion (Fig. 3). The Cu(Ⅰ) ion of the [Cu(L1)2]+ unit is tetra-coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the two L1 ligands. The central Cu(Ⅰ) displays a seesaw geometry with a minimum CShM value of 6.636[46] (Table S18). During the synthesis of 3, the reduction of Cu(Ⅱ) to Cu(Ⅰ) occurred due to the presence of DMF. The Cu—Npyridine bond lengths are 0.207 58(14) and 0.202 75(14) nm, respectively. The Cu—Nimidazole bond distances are 0.207 02(15) and 0.200 22(14) nm, respectively.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 3 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 3; (c) Packing diagram of 3 viewed along the b-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Two types of ππ stacking interactions are found in the packing diagram of 3 [Fig. 3b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.256 59(11) nm, Cg3…Cg4 distance: 0.350 46(12) nm]. Fig. 3c displays the packing diagram of 3 viewed along the b-axis. The packing structure is stabilized by the ππ stacking interactions.

    Complex 4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbca space group. 4 consists of two L2 ligands, two iodide ions, and two monovalent copper ions (Fig. 4). 4 has a crystallographically imposed C2 symmetry; therefore, there is only one crystallographically independent Cu(Ⅰ) site. The Cu(Ⅰ) site is tetra-coordinated by two nitrogen atoms from the L2 ligand and two bridging I- ligands. The two Cu(Ⅰ) ions are doubly bridged by two I- ligands to form a rhombic Cu2I2 ring. The Cu(Ⅰ) ion shows a tetrahedral geometry with a minimum CShM value of 4.467[46] (Table S18). The bond lengths of Cu1—I1 and Cu1—I1A are 0.257 77(11) and 0.262 32(12) nm, respectively. The bond distances of Cu1—N2 and Cu1—N4 are 0.210 1(6) and 0.207 0(6) nm, respectively. The Cu(Ⅰ)—N distances of 4 are slightly longer than the Cu(Ⅱ)—N distances in 1·2CH2Cl2. The Cu(Ⅰ)…Cu(Ⅰ) distance is 0.250 94(18) nm, which is much shorter than the Cu(Ⅱ)…Cu(Ⅱ) distance (0.342 7 nm) in 1·2CH2Cl2.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 4 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 4; (c) Packing diagram of 4 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z.

    The structure of 4 deserves some comments. CuCl2·2H2O was utilized as the metal source, but the two Cu(Ⅰ) ions were connected by two I- ions, revealing that an in situ metal-ligand reaction occurred during the process for the formation of 4. Both the reduction of Cu(Ⅱ) to Cu(Ⅰ) in the presence of DMF and the cleavage of the C—I bond under solvothermal conditions occurred, resulting in the iodide-bridged dinuclear Cu(Ⅰ) complex.

    Further structural investigation of 4 reveals ππ stacking interactions between the pyridine ring of one molecule and the pyridyl moiety of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine motif in another molecule [Fig. 4b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.376 4(5) nm]. Fig. 4c shows the 2D packing diagram of 4 viewed along the c-axis. The packing structure is stable due to the existence of the ππ stacking interactions.

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that complex 5 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group of P21/n. The structure of 5 consists of two L2 ligands, two ClO4- units, and one Cu(Ⅱ) ion, with one ClO4- unit involved in the coordination of the Cu(Ⅱ) ion (Fig. 5) and another ClO4- ion serving as a counterion. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion is penta-coordinated by four nitrogen atoms from two L2 ligands and one oxygen atom from one ClO4- ion. Thus, the Cu(Ⅱ) ion exhibits a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with a minimum CShM value of 0.995[46] (Table S17). The bond lengths of Cu—N are in a range of 0.195 1(5)-0.206 7(5) nm, which is similar to those of Cu(Ⅱ)—N bonds in complexes 1·2CH2Cl2 and 2.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 5 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 5; (c) Packing diagram of 5 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    There exist ππ stacking interactions among the pyridine ring of one molecule and the pyridyl moiety of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine motif in another molecule [Fig. 5b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.346 9(4) nm]. The 2D packing diagram of 5 viewed along the c-axis is presented in Fig. 4c. The packing structure is stabilized via the ππ stacking interactions.

    Complex 6 crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/n space group. 6 contains a [Cu(L3)Cl]+ cation and a [CuCl2]- anion (Fig. 6). The Cu(Ⅱ) ion in the [Cu(L3)Cl]+ unit is penta-coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the in situ-formed L3 ligand and a chloride ligand, and Cu(Ⅱ) ion shows a square pyramid geometry with a minimum CShM value of 1.867[46] (Table S17). The Cu1—Npyridine bond lengths are 0.207 58(14) and 0.202 75(14) nm, and the Cu1—Nimidazole distances are 0.207 02(15) and 0.200 22(14) nm, which are typical for Cu(Ⅱ)—N bond lengths.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Molecular structure of complex 6 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Complex 7 crystallizes in the P1 space group of the triclinic crystal system. The structure of 7 is composed of a cationic [Cu(L4)Cl]+ unit, an anionic [CuCl2]- ion and a half neutral [Cu2(L1)2Cl4] unit (Fig. 7). In the [Cu(L4)Cl]+ ion, the Cu(Ⅱ) ion is penta-coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the in situ-formed L4 ligand and one chloride ligand. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion shows a square pyramid geometry with a minimum CShM value of 2.000[46] (Table S17). The structure of the neutral [Cu2(L1)2Cl4] unit is exactly identical to that of complex 1, in which the Cu ion exhibits a +2 valence state. In the anionic [CuCl2]- unit, the copper ion displays a +1 valence state.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 7 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 7; (c) Packing diagram of 7 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: -x, 1-y, 1-z.

    A prominent feature of the synthesis of 7 was the occurrence of two types of in situ metal-ligand reactions. An aldehyde group of terephthalaldehyde reacted with the C-1 position of the L1 ligand, connecting two L1 ligands with a carbon atom of terephthalaldehyde. Moreover, another aldehyde group of terephthalaldehyde underwent a kentalization reaction with two solvent (EtOH) molecules. The combination of the two in situ metal-ligand reactions led to the formation of complex 7 with an aesthetically pleasing structure.

    There are ππ stacking interactions among the pyridine ring of one molecule and the pyridyl motif of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine scaffold in another molecule [Fig. 7b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.390 7(4) nm]. Fig. 7c shows the 2D packing diagram of 7 viewed along the c-axis. The packing structure is stabilized through the ππ stacking interactions.

    Complex 8·EtOH crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbcm space group. The structures of 8·EtOH and 6 are similar. The structure of 8·EtOH consists of a cationic [Cu(L5)Cl]+ unit, a chloride counterion, and a solvent (EtOH) molecule (Fig. 8). A ligand L5 was formed by the in situ metal-ligand reaction of L1 and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion shows a square pyramid geometry with a minimum CShM value of 2.529[46] (Table S17).

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  (a) Molecular structure of complex 8·EtOH with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 8·EtOH; (c) Hydrogen bonding interactions in 8·EtOH with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (d) Packing diagram of 8·EtOH viewed along the a-axis

    The hydrogen atoms and solvent (EtOH) molecules are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: x, y, 1/2-z.

    A detailed structural study reveals ππ stacking [Fig. 8b, Cg1…Cg2 distance: 0.353 3(4) nm] and hydrogen bonding [Fig. 8c, C7…Cl10 distance: 0.257 45(10) nm, O2B…Cl1B distance: 0.220 98(16) nm] interactions. Fig. 8d shows the 2D packing diagram of 8·EtOH viewed along the a-axis. The packing structure is stabilized through the hydrogen bonding and the ππ stacking interactions.

    Ketalization is an important method for protecting carbonyl groups in organic synthesis[47-49]. The ketalization reaction generally requires Brønsted acids such as anhydrous HCl and H2SO4 as catalysts. However, these inorganic acids cannot be easily isolated and recycled, leading to serious corrosion of equipment and the production of waste materials. Therefore, the development of more efficient, recyclable, and pollution-free catalysts for ketalization reactions is highly important. Some copper complexes are efficient catalysts for this ketalization transformation.

    After the successful synthesis of 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-7, and 8·EtOH, we examined their catalytic activity toward the ketalization of acetone. First, 1·2CH2Cl2 was selected as the catalyst (x=0.2%), ethylene glycol was chosen as the alcohol source, and toluene was used as the reaction solvent. The product 2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolane was obtained in 45% yield (Table 1, entry 1) after the reaction mixture was heated at 110 ℃ for 24 h. We then conducted the reactions catalyzed by 2-7 and 8·EtOH under the same conditions as those in which 1·2CH2Cl2 was used as the catalyst (Table 1, entries 2-8). Except for complex 4 (Table 1, entry 4), the remaining seven complexes were all catalytically active for this reaction, and the product 2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolane was obtained in 87%-91% yields by using complexes 2-3, 5-7, and 8·EtOH, respectively, as catalysts. Complex 4 was catalytically inactive in this reaction. It is reasoned that the larger atomic radius of bridging iodide ions and shorter Cu(Ⅰ)…Cu(Ⅰ) distance in 4 hindered the coordination of the substrates to the metal center, leading to the catalytic inactivity of complex 4.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Ketalization of acetone catalyzed by complexes 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-7, and 8·EtOHa
    下载: 导出CSV
    Entry Catalyst xcat / % T / ℃ t / h Yieldb / %
    1c 1 0.2 110 24 45
    2 2 0.2 110 24 89
    3 3 0.2 110 24 88
    4 4 0.2 110 24 0
    5 5 0.2 110 24 91
    6 6 0.2 110 24 90
    7 7 0.2 110 24 87
    8c 8 0.2 110 24 91
    9d 25 24 0
    10d 2 0.2 25 24 21
    a Conditions: acetone (0.7 mmol), ethylene glycol (0.7 mmol), and toluene (0.5 mL); b Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis; c Solvents were not used; d Irradiated by 400-410 nm LEDs.

    To study whether the reaction is photocatalyzed or if complex 2 could serve as a photocatalyst, the ketalization of acetone was conducted by irradiating the reaction with 400-410 nm LEDs without the use of 2 (Table 1, entry 9) as the catalyst at room temperature. No product was detected. In addition, the reaction was performed by employing 2 as the catalyst under irradiation with 400-410 nm LEDs (Table 1, entry 10). A 21% yield of the product was obtained. These results indicate that this reaction is not affected by light and that complex 2 cannot be used as a photocatalyst.

    Next, the scope of the ketalization reaction was expanded. The ketalization of acetone, butanone, acetylacetone, and cyclohexanone by ethylene glycol catalyzed by 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-3, 5-7, and 8·EtOH was explored (Table 2). Except for the ketalization of acetylacetone catalyzed by 1·2CH2Cl2, which gave 1-(2-methyl-1, 3-dioxolan-2-yl)propan-2-one in a low yield of 49% (Table 2, entry 8), the yields of the other reactions were high, and the yields of the other ketals ranged from 77% to 100%, indicating the high catalytic activity of these complexes.

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Ketalization of ketones catalyzed by complexes 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-3, 5-7, and 8·EtOHa
    下载: 导出CSV
    Entry Ketone Product Catalyst xcat / % T / ℃ Yieldb / %
    1c 1 0.2 110 80
    2 2 0.2 110 82
    3 3 0.2 110 97
    4 5 0.2 110 98
    5 6 0.2 110 93
    6 7 0.2 110 96
    7c 8 0.2 110 92
    8c 1 0.2 110 49
    9 2 0.2 110 89
    10 3 0.2 110 97
    11 5 0.2 110 97
    12 6 0.2 110 91
    13 7 0.2 110 91
    14c 8 0.2 110 87
    15c 1 0.2 110 85
    16 2 0.2 110 100
    17 3 0.2 110 99
    18 5 0.2 110 98
    19 6 0.2 110 98
    20 7 0.2 110 99
    21c 8 0.2 110 97
    a Conditions: acetone (0.7 mmol), ethylene glycol (0.7 mmol), and toluene (0.5 mL); b Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis; c Solvents were not used.

    Eight copper complexes were prepared and characterized. Complexes 1-3 were synthesized by the reactions of different copper salts with 3-pyridinylimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (L1). Complex 4 was obtained by the use of an iodide-containing L2 ligand to react with CuCl2·2H2O, leading to the formation of iodide-bridged dinuclear Cu(Ⅰ) complex 4 via in situ cleavage of the C—I bond of the L2 ligand. Three complexes, 6-7 and 8·EtOH, were prepared by intuitively inducing an in situ metal-ligand reaction via the addition of aldehydes to the reaction system of CuCl2·2H2O and the L1 ligand. The catalytic activity of these eight complexes toward the ketalization of a series of ketones by ethylene glycol was explored. Complex 4 was inactive in this reaction. This may be due to the short Cu(Ⅰ)…Cu(Ⅰ) distance and large radius of the iodide ion in 4, rendering the coordination of the substrates to the Cu(Ⅰ) ion more difficult. The remaining seven complexes all showed excellent catalytic behavior toward this ketalization reaction. This work provides a perspective for the synthesis of economically friendly and environmentally friendly Cu(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅰ) complexes with catalytic activity.

    Supporting information is available at http://www.wjhxxb.cn


    1. [1]

      MIYAURA N, NEUBA A, FLORKE U, MEYER-KLAUCK W, SALOMONE-STAGNI M, BILLE , BOTHE E, HFER P, HENKEL G. The trinuclear copper(Ⅰ) thiolate complexes[Cu3(NGuaS)3]0/1+ and their dimeric variants[Cu6(NGuaS)6]1+/2+/3+ with biomimetic redox properties[J]. Angew. Chem.‒Int. Edit., 2011, 50:  4503-4507. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008076

    2. [2]

      TAO W, YERBULEKOVA A, MOORE C E, SHAFAAT H S, ZHANG S. Controlling the direction of S-nitrosation versus denitrosation: Reversible cleavage and formation of an S—N bond within a dicopper center[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144:  2867-2872. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12799

    3. [3]

      MIRTS E N, DIKANOV S A, JOSE A, SOLOMON E I, LU Y. A binuclear CuA center designed in an all α-helical protein scaffold[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142:  13779-13794. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04226

    4. [4]

      PRIGGE S T, EIPPER B A, MAINS R E, AMZEL L M. Dioxygen binds end-on to mononuclear copper in a precatalytic enzyme complex[J]. Science, 2004, 304:  864-867. doi: 10.1126/science.1094583

    5. [5]

      LIEBERMAN R L, ROSENZWEIG A C. Crystal structure of a membrane-bound metalloenzyme that catalysis the biological oxidation of methane[J]. Nature, 2005, 434:  177-182. doi: 10.1038/nature03311

    6. [6]

      DÍEZ-GONZÁLEZ S, NOLAN S P. N-heterocyclic carbene-copper(Ⅰ) complexes in homogeneous catalysis[J]. Synlett, 2007, (14):  2158-2167.

    7. [7]

      LAZREG F, NAHRA F, CAZIN C S J. Copper-NHC complexes in catalysis[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2015, 293-294:  48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.12.019

    8. [8]

      KUMAR S, ARORA A, MAIKHURI V K, CHAUDHARY A, KUMAR R, PARMAR V S, SINGH B K, MATHUR D. Advances in chromone-based copper(Ⅱ) Schiff base complexes: Synthesis, characterization, and versatile applications in pharmacology and biomimetic catalysis[J]. RSC Adv., 2024, 14:  17102-17139. doi: 10.1039/D4RA00590B

    9. [9]

      PLASS W, POHLMANN A, RAUTENGARTEN J. Magnetic interactions as supramolecular function: Structure and magnetic properties of hydrogen-bridged dinuclear copper(Ⅱ) complexes[J]. Angew. Chem.‒Int. Edit., 2001, 40:  4207-4210. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011119)40:22<4207::AID-ANIE4207>3.0.CO;2-W

    10. [10]

      HOZUMI T, HASHIMOTO K, OHKOSHI S I. Electrochemical synthesis, crystal structure, and photomagnetic properties of a three-dimensional cyano-bridged copper-molybdenum complex[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127:  3864-3869. doi: 10.1021/ja044107o

    11. [11]

      LI J Y, WANG L D, ZHAO Z F, LI X Y, YU X, HUO P H, JIN Q H, LIU Z W, BIAN Z Q, HUANG C H. Two-coordinate copper(Ⅰ)/NHC complexes: Dual emission properties and ultralong room-temperature phosphorescence[J]. Angew. Chem.‒Int. Edit., 2020, 59:  8210-8217. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916379

    12. [12]

      ZHANG J P, LIN Y Y, HUANG X C, CHEN X M. Copper(Ⅰ) 1, 2, 4-triazolates and related complexes: Studies of the solvothermal ligand reactions, network topologies, and photoluminescence properties[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127:  5495-5506. doi: 10.1021/ja042222t

    13. [13]

      LAVIE-CAMBOT A, CANTUEL M, LEYDET Y, JONUSAUSKAS G, BASSANI D, McCLENAGHAN N D. Improving the photophysical properties of copper(Ⅰ) bis(phenanthroline) complexes[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2008, 252:  2572-2584. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.03.013

    14. [14]

      WILLIAMS R M, DE COLA L, HARTL F, LAGREF J J, PLANEIX J M, DE CIAN A, HOSSEINI M W. Photophysical, electrochemical and electrochromic properties of copper-bis(4, 4'-dimethyl-6, 6'-diphenyl-2, 2'-bipyridine) complexes[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 230:  253-261. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00046-2

    15. [15]

      HAMZE R, PELTIER J L, SYLVINSON D, BERTRAND G, THOMPSON M E. Eliminating nonradiative decay in Cu(Ⅰ) emitters: > 99% quantum efficiency and microsecond lifetime[J]. Science, 2019, 363:  601-606. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2865

    16. [16]

      SCHNEIDER J L, CARRIER S M, RUGGIERO C E, YOUNG V G, TOLMAN W B. Influences of ligand environment on the spectroscopic properties and disproportionation reactivity of copper-nitrosyl complexes[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120:  11408-11418. doi: 10.1021/ja982172q

    17. [17]

      KIM D, WANG L P, HALE J J, LYNCH C L, BUDHU R J, MACCOSS M, MILLS S G, MALKOWITZ L, GOULD S L, DEMARTINO J A, SPRINGER M S, HAZUDA D, MILLER M, KESSLER J, HRIN R C, CARVER G, CARELLA A, HENRY K, LINEBERGER J, SCHLEIF W A, EMINI E A. Potent 1, 3, 4-trisubstituted pyrrolidine CCR5 receptor antagonists: Effects of fused heterocycles on antiviral activity and pharmacokinetic properties[J]. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15:  2129. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.02.030

    18. [18]

      VANDA D, ZAJDEL P, SOURAL M. Imidazopyridine-based selective and multifunctional ligands of biological targets associated with psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases[J]. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2019, 181:  111569. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111569

    19. [19]

      KITAZAWA D, TOMINAGA G, TAKANO A. One-pot three-component synthesis of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridines[J]. Chemical Abstracts, 2001, 134:  200276.

    20. [20]

      NAKAMURA H, YAMAMOTO H. One-pot three-component synthesis of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridines[J]. Chemical Abstracts, 2005, 142:  440277.

    21. [21]

      ALBRECHT G, GEIS C, HERR J M, RUHLI J, GOTTLICH R, SCHELTTWEIN D. Electroluminescence and contact formation of 1-(pyridin-2-yl)-3-(quinolin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]quinoline thin films[J]. Org. Electron., 2019, 65:  321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.11.032

    22. [22]

      IMADA Y, MUKAI S, TAHARA K, KOZAI N, ITAYA M, YOSHIDA Y, UETA S, ARAKAWA Y, MINAGAWA K, YAGISHITA F. Divalent metal complexes of N, O- and N, N-bidentate imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands: Synthesis, crystal structures, and photophysical properties[J]. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2023, 555:  121584. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2023.121584

    23. [23]

      DONG J, YANG D D, WANG B Q. Homo- and copolymerization of norbornene with allyl palladium and nickel complexes bearing imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine sulfonate ligands[J]. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2021, :  4661-4668.

    24. [24]

      PISCHEDDA S, STOCCORO S, ZUCCA A, SCIORTINO G, ORTU F, CLARKSON G J. Synthesis and characterization of new Pd(Ⅱ) and Pt(Ⅱ) complexes with 3-substituted 1-(2-pyridyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands[J]. Dalton Trans., 2021, 50:  4859-4873. doi: 10.1039/D1DT00546D

    25. [25]

      CUI Y F, GE Y, LI Y H, TAO J, YAO J L, DONG Y P. Single-ion magnet behavior of two pentacoordinate Co complexes with a pincer ligand 2, 6-bis(imidazo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl)pyridine[J]. Struct. Chem., 2020, 31:  547-555. doi: 10.1007/s11224-019-01429-3

    26. [26]

      ZHANG H F, CHEN Y M, QIN Y R, LI Y H, LI W, LIU W. Cu and Cu complexes of 1, 1'-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)-bis[3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine]: In situ generation of the ligand via acetic acid-controlled metal-ligand reactions[J]. Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2015, 34:  1417-1427.

    27. [27]

      LIU J N, CAO Y H, LI L, PEI H, CHEN Y M, HU J F, QIN Y R, LI Y H, LI W, LIU W. Titanium complexes supported by imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-containing pyrrolyl ligand as catalysts for hydroamination and polymerization reactions, and as an antitumor reagent[J]. RSC Adv., 2015, 5:  10318-10325. doi: 10.1039/C4RA14692A

    28. [28]

      SCHLEICHER D, TRONNIER A, SOELLNER J, STRASSNER T. Cyclometalated ruthenium(Ⅱ) NHC complexes with imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-based (C.C) ligands—Synthesis and characterization[J]. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2019, 2019:  1956-1965. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201900108

    29. [29]

      ZHANG Y W, DAS R, LI Y, WANG Y Y, HAN Y F. Synthesis, characterization, and properties of organometallic molecular cylinders bearing bulky imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-based N-heterocyclic carbene ligands[J]. Chem.‒Eur. J., 2019, 25:  5472-5479. doi: 10.1002/chem.201806204

    30. [30]

      CHEN Y M, LI L, CHEN Z, LIU Y L, HU H L, CHEN W Q, LIU W, LI Y H, LEI T, CAO Y Y, KANG Z H, LIN M S, LI W. Metal-mediated controllable creation of secondary, tertiary, and quaternary carbon centers: A powerful strategy for the synthesis of iron, cobalt, and copper complexes with in situ generated substituted 1-pyridineimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51:  9705-9713. doi: 10.1021/ic300949y

    31. [31]

      KUNDU N, BHATTACHARYA K, ABTAB S M T, CHAUDHURY M. 'One-pot' synthesis of multi-ring heteroaromatic compounds involving a pair of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine moiety: Reporting an interesting bis-bidentate ligand capable of forming helicates[J]. Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53:  2719-2721. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.03.078

    32. [32]

      FULWA V K, SAHU R, JENA H S, MANIVANNAN V. Novel synthesis of 2, 4-bis(2-pyridyl)-5-(pyridyl)imidazoles and formation of N-(3-(pyridyl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine)picolinamidines: Nitrogen-rich ligands[J]. Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50:  6264-6267. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.002

    33. [33]

      BURSTEIN C, LEHMANN C W, GLORIUS F. Imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-3-ylidenes-pyridine derived N-heterocyclic carbene ligands[J]. Tetrahedron, 2005, 61:  6207-6217. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.03.115

    34. [34]

      WANG J, DYERS L, MASON R, AMOYAW P, BU X R. Highly efficient and direct heterocyclization of dipyridyl ketone to N, N-bidentate ligands[J]. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70:  2353-2356. doi: 10.1021/jo047853k

    35. [35]

      BLUHM M E, FOLLI C, PUFKY D, KRÖGER M, WALTER O, DÖRING M. 3-Aminoiminoacrylate, 3-aminoacrylate, and 3-amidoiminomalonate complexes as catalysts for the dimerization of olefins[J]. Organometallics, 2005, 24:  4139-4152. doi: 10.1021/om049075s

    36. [36]

      ÁLVAREZ C M, ÁLVAREZ-MIGUEL L, GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ R, MARTÍN-ÁLVAREZ J M, MIGUEL D. 3-(Pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (pyridylindolizine) as ligand in complexes of transition and main-group metals[J]. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2015, 2015:  4921-4934. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201500776

    37. [37]

      LIGTENBARG A G J, SPEK A L, HAGE R B, FERINGA B L. Vanadium(Ⅴ) complexes based on a bis(pyridine)-imine ligand (HL); Synthesis and crystal structure of a dioxovanadium(Ⅴ) complex involving a ligand cyclisation[J]. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 1999, (5):  659-661. doi: 10.1039/a809476d

    38. [38]

      ÁLVAREZ C M, ÁLVAREZ-MIGUEL L, GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ R, MIGUEL D. Complexes with 3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands by spontaneous dimerization of pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde within the coordination sphere of manganese(Ⅱ) in a one-pot reaction[J]. Dalton Trans., 2012, 41:  7041-7046. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30453h

    39. [39]

      GARINO C, RUIU T, SALASSA L, ALBERTINO A, VOLPI G, NERVI C, GOBETTO R, HARDCASTLE K I. Spectroscopic and computational study on new blue emitting ReL(CO)3Cl complexes containing pyridylimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands[J]. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2008, :  3587-3591.

    40. [40]

      SALASSA L, GARINO C, ALBERTINO A, VOLPI G, NERVI C, GOBETTO R, HARDCASTLE K I. Computational and spectroscopic studies of new rhenium(Ⅰ) complexes containing pyridylimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands: Charge transfer and dual emission by fine-tuning of excited states[J]. Organometallics, 2008, 27:  1427-1435. doi: 10.1021/om701175z

    41. [41]

      VOLPI G, GARINO C, SALASSA L, FIEDLER J, HARDCASTLE K I, GOBETTO R, NERVI C. Cationic heteroleptic cyclometalated iridium complexes with 1-pyridylimidazo[1,5-α]pyridine ligands: Exploitation of an efficient intersystem crossing[J]. Chem.‒Eur. J., 2009, 15:  6415-6427. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801474

    42. [42]

      CHEN Y M, LI L, CAO Y Y, WU J, GAO Q, LI Y H, HU H L, LIU W, LIU Y L, KANG Z H, LI J P. Cu-mediated controllable creation of tertiary and quaternary carbon centers: Designed assembly and structures of a new class of copper complexes supported by in situ generated substituted 1-pyridineimidazo[1,5-a]pyridine ligands[J]. CrystEngComm, 2013, 15:  2675-2681. doi: 10.1039/c3ce00012e

    43. [43]

      BLUHM V, CIESIELSKI M, GÖRLS H, WALTER O, DÖRING M. Complexes of Schiff bases and intermediates in the copper-catalyzed oxidative heterocyclization by atmospheric oxygen[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42:  8878-8885. doi: 10.1021/ic034773a

    44. [44]

      DOLOMANOV O V, BOURHIS L J, GILDEA R J, HOWARD J A K, PUSCHMANN H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution refinement and analysis program[J]. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2009, 42:  339-341. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808042726

    45. [45]

      SHELDRICK G M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL[J]. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C, 2015, C71:  3-8.

    46. [46]

      CASANOVA D, LLUNELL M, ALEMANY P, ALVAREZ S. The rich stereochemistry of eight-vertex polyhedra: A continuous shape measures study[J]. Chem.‒Eur. J., 2005, 11:  1479-1494. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400799

    47. [47]

      ZHANG Q, CUI Y F, ZHANG X M, LI Y H, YAO J L. Manganese(Ⅱ) and copper(Ⅰ) compounds based on two derivatives of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine: Synthesis, structures, magnetic properties, and catalytic activity[J]. Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2022, 41:  2203148.

    48. [48]

      JING Y, ZHANG X M, CUI Y F, LI D W, SUN H, GE Y, LI Y H. Two copper complexes based on derivatives of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine: Synthesis, structures, and catalytic property[J]. Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2020, 39:  1057-1062.

    49. [49]

      FEI H H, ROGOW D L, OLIVER S R J. Reversible anion exchange and catalytic properties of two cationic metal-organic frameworks based on Cu(Ⅰ) and Ag(Ⅰ)[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132:  7202-7209.

  • Scheme 1  Synthesis of complexes 1-3

    Scheme 2  Synthesis of complexes 4 and 5

    Scheme 3  Synthesis of complexes 6, 7, and 8·EtOH

    Figure 1  (a) Molecular structure of complex 1·2CH2Cl2 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 1·2CH2Cl2; (c) Packing diagram of 1·2CH2Cl2 viewed along the b-axis

    The hydrogen atoms and solvent (CH2Cl2) molecules are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, -y, 1-z.

    Figure 2  (a) Molecular structure of complex 2 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 2; (c) Packing diagram of 2 viewed along the a-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, y, 3/2-z.

    Figure 3  (a) Molecular structure of complex 3 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 3; (c) Packing diagram of 3 viewed along the b-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Figure 4  (a) Molecular structure of complex 4 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 4; (c) Packing diagram of 4 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z.

    Figure 5  (a) Molecular structure of complex 5 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 5; (c) Packing diagram of 5 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Figure 6  Molecular structure of complex 6 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Figure 7  (a) Molecular structure of complex 7 with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 7; (c) Packing diagram of 7 viewed along the c-axis

    The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: -x, 1-y, 1-z.

    Figure 8  (a) Molecular structure of complex 8·EtOH with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (b) ππ stacking interactions in 8·EtOH; (c) Hydrogen bonding interactions in 8·EtOH with thermal ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (d) Packing diagram of 8·EtOH viewed along the a-axis

    The hydrogen atoms and solvent (EtOH) molecules are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: x, y, 1/2-z.

    Table 1.  Ketalization of acetone catalyzed by complexes 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-7, and 8·EtOHa

    Entry Catalyst xcat / % T / ℃ t / h Yieldb / %
    1c 1 0.2 110 24 45
    2 2 0.2 110 24 89
    3 3 0.2 110 24 88
    4 4 0.2 110 24 0
    5 5 0.2 110 24 91
    6 6 0.2 110 24 90
    7 7 0.2 110 24 87
    8c 8 0.2 110 24 91
    9d 25 24 0
    10d 2 0.2 25 24 21
    a Conditions: acetone (0.7 mmol), ethylene glycol (0.7 mmol), and toluene (0.5 mL); b Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis; c Solvents were not used; d Irradiated by 400-410 nm LEDs.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Ketalization of ketones catalyzed by complexes 1·2CH2Cl2, 2-3, 5-7, and 8·EtOHa

    Entry Ketone Product Catalyst xcat / % T / ℃ Yieldb / %
    1c 1 0.2 110 80
    2 2 0.2 110 82
    3 3 0.2 110 97
    4 5 0.2 110 98
    5 6 0.2 110 93
    6 7 0.2 110 96
    7c 8 0.2 110 92
    8c 1 0.2 110 49
    9 2 0.2 110 89
    10 3 0.2 110 97
    11 5 0.2 110 97
    12 6 0.2 110 91
    13 7 0.2 110 91
    14c 8 0.2 110 87
    15c 1 0.2 110 85
    16 2 0.2 110 100
    17 3 0.2 110 99
    18 5 0.2 110 98
    19 6 0.2 110 98
    20 7 0.2 110 99
    21c 8 0.2 110 97
    a Conditions: acetone (0.7 mmol), ethylene glycol (0.7 mmol), and toluene (0.5 mL); b Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis; c Solvents were not used.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  43
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2025-05-10
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-01
  • 修回日期:  2025-03-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章