
H atoms and lattice water molecules are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: -x+3/2, -y+1, z; B: -x+2, -y+1, -z+1.
Syntheses and catalytic performances of three coordination polymers with tetracarboxylate ligands
Zhenzhong MEI , Hongyu WANG , Xiuqi KANG , Yongliang SHAO , Jinzhong GU
Coordination polymers (CPs) represent a highly diverse and popular class of compounds known for their multifarious structures and significant applications[1-5], including but not limited to sensing[6-7], gas sorption[8-9], and catalysis[10-12]. This spectrum of applications is intricately dependent on the structural characteristics of CPs and the type of metal ions and ligands they are constructed from[13-15]. Among the plethora of organic ligands used to assemble CPs, aromatic multicarboxylic acids constitute the most common and widely explored type of linkers on account of their high diversity, good chemical and thermal stability, facile functionalization, and coordination versatility[11-12, 16-18].
Within our general research objective aimed at exploring some commercially available but still little-studied multi-carboxylic acids as potential linkers for the design of functional CPs[11-12, 19-21], we have focused on the present work on an aminocarboxylate ligand, namely 5, 5′-azanediyldiisophthalic acid (H4adip). The selection of the ligand has relied on the following considerations. (1) This tetracarboxylic acid possesses eight potential coordination sites that can realize a high diversity of coordination patterns. (2) The presence of the NH group might allow performing based-catalyzed reactions, such as the Henry and Knoevenagel condensation reactions, the classic and versatile C—C bond-forming reactions in synthetic chemistry[22-25]. (3) H4adip has not yet been widely applied in CPs[26-27].
Motivated by all these facts, we report herein the hydrothermal synthesis, isolation, characterization, and elucidation of crystal structures and topological features, as well as the evaluation of the catalytic performance of the three CPs. These compounds, comprising Zn(Ⅱ) and Co(Ⅱ), were assembled utilizing H4adip as a linker in conjunction with different supporting ligands, specifically N-donor mediators of crystallization. The resulting products have been formulated as {[Zn2(μ6-adip)(phen)2]·4H2O}n (1), {[Co2(μ6-adip)(bipy)2]·4H2O}n (2), and [Co2(μ4-adip)(μ-bpa)2]n (3), where phen=1, 10-phenanthroline, bipy=2, 2′-bipyridine, bpa=bis(4-pyridyl)amine. In addition to extending the application of CPs driven by H4adip-derived linkers, three synthesized compounds act as remarkable heterogeneous catalysts in the Henry reaction. Of significant interest is the system based on CP 3, which could lead to a higher conversion of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde into the corresponding product. The study further explored catalyst reusability, the scope of substrates, and the impact of various reaction parameters.
All chemicals and solvents were of AR grade and used without further purification. Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen were determined using an Elementar Vario EL elemental analyzer. IR spectra were recorded using KBr pellets and a Bruker EQUINOX 55 spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) data were collected on a LINSEIS STA PT1600 thermal analyzer with a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were measured on a Rigaku-Dmax 2400 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.154 06 nm), the X-ray tube was operated at 40 kV and 40 mA, and the data collection range was between 5° and 45°. Solution 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a JNM ECS 400M spectrometer.
A mixture of ZnCl2 (0.027 g, 0.20 mmol), H4adip (0.034 g, 0.10 mmol), phen (0.040 g, 0.20 mmol), NaOH (0.016 g, 0.40 mmol), and H2O (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 15 min, and then sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, and heated at 160 ℃ for 3 d, followed by cooling to room temperature at a rate of 10 ℃·h-1. Colourless block-shaped crystals of 1 were isolated manually, and washed with distilled water. Yield: 47% (based on H4adip). Anal. Calcd. for C20H15.5ZnN2.5O6(%): C 53.11, H 3.45, N 7.74; Found(%): C 53.32, H 3.42, N 7.78. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 488m, 3 252w, 3 073w, 1 615w, 1 578s, 1 537s, 1 428 m, 1 407s, 1 379s, 1 317w, 1 220w, 1 147w, 1 106w, 1 025 w, 926w, 894w, 834w, 845m, 817w, 788m, 723m, 646w.
The synthesis was the same as that of compound 1, except that ZnCl2 and phen were replaced by CoCl2·6H2O (0.048 g, 0.20 mmol) and bipy (0.031 g, 0.20 mmol). Pink needle-shaped crystals of compound 2 were isolated manually, washed with distilled water, and dried. Yield: 45% (based on H4adip). Anal. Calcd. for C18H15.5CoN2.5O6(%): C, 51.26; H, 3.70; N, 8.30. Found(%): C, 51.53; H, 3.72; N, 8.25. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 484w, 3 281w, 3 089w, 1 605w, 1 570s, 1 537s, 1 448m, 1 403s, 1 391s, 1 317w, 1 289w, 1 248w, 1 163w, 1 147 w, 1 065w, 1 025w, 935w, 894w, 812w, 792m, 763m, 731m, 654w.
The synthesis was the same as that of compound 2, except that phen was replaced by bpa (0.034 g, 0.2 mmol). Pink block-shaped crystals of compound 3 were isolated manually, and washed with distilled water. Yield: 45% (based on H4adip). Anal. Calcd. for C36H25Co2N7O8(%): C 53.95, H 3.14, N 12.23; Found(%): C 53.71, H 3.12, N 12.28. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 259w, 1 625w, 1 597s, 1 577s, 1 516m, 1 441m, 1 345s, 1 317 m, 1 213w, 1 057w, 1 021m, 950w, 905w, 857w, 826m, 781w, 726w, 658w, 602w. These compounds are insoluble in water and common organic solvents, such as methanol, ethanol, acetone, and DMF.
Three suitable single crystals with dimensions of 0.08 mm×0.04 mm×0.03 mm (1), 0.10 mm×0.03 mm×0.02 mm (2), and 0.07 mm×0.03 mm×0.03 mm (3) were collected at 301(2) K on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer with Mo Kα (λ=0.071 073 nm). Semi-empirical absorption corrections were applied using the SADABS program. The structures were solved by direct method and refined by full-matrix least-square on F2 using the SHELXTL-2014 program. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All the hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions with fixed isotropic thermal parameters in included in structure factor calculations in the final stage of full-matrix least-squares refinement. Some highly disordered solvent molecules in 1 and 2 were removed using the SQUEEZE routine in PLATON[28]. The final amount of solvent molecules was estimated from the data of elemental and thermogravimetric analyses. A summary of the crystallography data and structure refinements for compounds 1-3 is given in Table S1 (Supporting information). The selected bond lengths and angles for 1-3 are listed in Table S2. Hydrogen bond parameters of 3 are given in Table S3.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that the structures of compounds 1 and 2 are similar and have 3D framework structures. The structure of 1 is described below as a selected example. The asymmetric unit of 1 contains one crystallographically unique Zn(Ⅱ) ion, a half of μ6-adip4- ligand, one phen moiety, and two lattice water molecules. As shown in Fig. 1, the Zn1 ion is six-coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms from three individual μ6-adip4- blocks and two N atoms from the phen ligand, constructing a distorted octahedral {ZnN2O4} geometry. The Zn—O bond lengths range from 0.206 0(2) to 0.237 3(2) nm, whereas the Zn—N bonds vary from 0.211 8(2) to 0.215 1(2) nm; these bonding parameters are comparable to those found in other reported Zn(Ⅱ) compounds[12, 19, 21]. In 1, the adip4- ligand exhibits the coordination mode Ⅰ (Scheme 1), in which four deprotonated carboxylate groups show bidentate or bridging bidentate modes. Two Zn1 ions are connected by two carboxylate groups from two distinct μ6-adip4- linkers, generating a Zn2 subunit (Fig. 2). These subunits are connected by the remaining carboxylate groups of μ6-adip4- linkers to form a 3D framework (Fig. 3). From a topological viewpoint, it is composed of the 3-linked Zn1 and 6-linked μ6-adip4- nodes that are arranged into a binodal 3, 6-connected framework with a new topology and a point symbol of (42.6.)2(44. 62.88.10) (Fig. 4).
The phen ligands are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: -x+3/2, -y+1, z+1; B: x-1/2, y, -z+2; C: -x+1, -y+1, -z+2; D: -x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2; E: -x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+5/2; F: x-1/2, -y+1/2, z+3/2; G: x, -y+1/2, -z+5/2; H: -x+2, -y+1, -z+2.
The asymmetric unit of compound 3 possesses one crystallographically independent Co(Ⅱ) ion, a half of μ4-adip4- block, and one μ-bpa ligand. As shown in Fig. 5, the Co1 ion is tetra-coordinated and adopts a distorted tetrahedral {CoN2O2} geometry formed by two carboxylate O atoms from two different μ4-adip4- blocks and two N atoms from two distinct μ-bpa ligands. The Co—O distance is 0.193 7(4) nm, whereas the Co—N distances are 0.204 3(5)-0.205 0(6) nm; these bonding parameters agree with those observed in other Co(Ⅱ) compounds[11-12, 21]. In 3, the adip4- block acts as a μ4-spacer (mode Ⅱ, Scheme 1), in which the carboxylate groups exhibit the monodentate modes. The bpa auxiliary ligand adopts a bridging coordination mode. The neighboring Co(Ⅱ) centers are linked by μ6-adip4- and μ-bpa blocks, giving rise to a 3D framework (Fig. 6). This 3D structure is composed of the 4-linked Co1 nodes, 4-linked μ4-adip4- nodes, and 2-connected μ-bpa linkers (Fig. 7). It is a qtz (quartz, 4/6/h1) topology and a point symbol of (64.82) (Fig. 7).
To determine the thermal stability of CPs 1-3, their thermal behaviors were investigated under a nitrogen atmosphere by TGA. As shown in Fig. 8, compound 1 lost its four lattice water molecules in a range of 36-138 ℃ (Calcd. 8.0%, Obsd. 8.2%, ), followed by the decomposition at 332 ℃. For compound 2, four lattice water molecules were released between 42 and 156 ℃ (Calcd. 8.5%, Obsd. 8.6%), whereas a dehydrated sample remained stable up to 309 ℃. Compound 3 does not contain any coordinated or crystallization water, and its framework shows stability on heating until 434 ℃.
A few amide-based CPs have been reported to act as catalysts for the Henry reaction[21-22]. The compounds prepared in this study, particularly Co(Ⅱ) CP 3, have both Lewis acid (Co2+ with unsaturated coordination) and basic center (amide group). Therefore, it presents a promising feature to act as a bifunctional catalyst. In addition, on account of their insolubility in common solvents, their use as heterogeneous catalysts should be particularly promising. So, we probed CPs 1-3 as heterogeneous catalysts in this reaction using assorted aldehydes with nitroethane. As a model substrate, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde was treated with nitroethane at 70 ℃ in a methanol medium to form a β-nitro alcohol product (Scheme 2, Table 1). Various parameters encompassing solvent selection, reaction temperature and duration, catalyst loading, recyclability, and substrate diversity were assessed.
Entry | Catalyst | Time / h | Temperature / ℃ | Catalyst loadinga / % | Solvent | Yieldb / % | Selectivity (nsyn/nanti) |
1 | 3 | 1 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 34 | 54∶46 |
2 | 3 | 2 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 55 | 55∶45 |
3 | 3 | 4 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 65 | 55∶45 |
4 | 3 | 6 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 74 | 55∶45 |
5 | 3 | 8 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 83 | 56∶44 |
6 | 3 | 10 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 88 | 55∶45 |
7 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 56∶44 |
8 | 3 | 16 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 55∶45 |
9 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 17 | 55∶45 |
10 | 3 | 12 | 60 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 75 | 56∶44 |
11 | 3 | 12 | 80 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 89 | 55∶45 |
12 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 3.0 | CH3OH | 82 | 55∶45 |
13 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 5.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 56∶44 |
14 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | H2O | 78 | 55∶45 |
15 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3CN | 12 | 45∶55 |
16 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | THF | 65 | 46∶54 |
17 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | C2H5OH | 53 | 55∶45 |
18 | 1 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 68 | 54∶46 |
19 | 2 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 64 | 55∶45 |
20 | Blank | 12 | 70 | CH3OH | 1 | 45∶55 | |
21 | CoCl2 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 10 | 44∶56 |
22 | H4adip | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 2 | 45∶55 |
a The loading amount of the catalyst is expressed in mole fractions; b Calculated by 1H NMR spectroscopy: Yield=nproduct/naldehyde×100%. |
CP 3 exhibited the highest activity, resulting in a 91% conversion of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde to two isomers of β-nitro alcohol products (Table 1 and Fig.S1). So, 3 was used to research the influence of different reaction parameters. The yield was accumulated with a yield increase from 34% to 91% on prolonging the reaction from 1 to 12 h (Table 1, entries 1-7). The influence of catalyst amount was also investigated, revealing a product yield growth from 82% to 91% on increasing the loading of the catalyst from 3.0% to 5.0% (entries 11-13). Entry 10 showed that 4.0% compound 3 was able to catalyze the reaction and produced the product in 75% at 60 ℃; however, a mild elevated temperature of 70 ℃ led to a yield of 91%. In addition to methanol, other solvents were tested. Water, ethanol, acetonitrile, and chloroform are less suitable (12%-78% product yields, respectively).
In comparison with 3, CPs 1 and 2 are less active, resulting in the maximum product yields in the 64%-68% range (entries 18 and 19, Table 1). It should be highlighted that under similar reaction conditions, the Henry reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde is significantly less efficient in the absence of the catalyst (only 1% product yield) or when using H4adip (2% yield) or CoCl2 (10% yield) as catalysts (entries 20-22, Table 1). Although there is no clear connection between the activity and structure of the catalyst, the superior performance of CP 3 might be related to the existence of open Co sites[21, 29-30].
Different substituted benzaldehyde substrates were used to study the substrate scope in the Henry reaction with nitroethane. These tests were run under optimized conditions (4.0% 3, CH3OH, 70 ℃, 12 h). The corresponding products were obtained in the yields varying from 23% to 91% (Table 2). Benzaldehydes containing a strong electron-withdrawing group (e.g., nitro, and chloro substituent in the ring) revealed the best efficiency (entries 2-5, Table 2), which can be explained by an increased electrophilicity of substrates. The benzaldehydes possessing an electron-donating functionality (e.g., methyl or methoxy group) led to lower product yields (entries 7 and 8, Table 2).
Entry | Substituted benzaldehyde substrate (R-C6H4CHO) | Product yieldb / % | Selectivity (nsyn/nanti) |
1 | R=H | 81 | 52∶48 |
2 | R=2-NO2 | 83 | 57∶43 |
3 | R=3-NO2 | 87 | 55∶45 |
4 | R=4-NO2 | 91 | 55∶45 |
5 | R=4-Cl | 82 | 51∶49 |
6 | R=4-OH | 61 | 55∶45 |
7 | R=4-CH3 | 55 | 44∶56 |
8 | R=4-OCH3 | 23 | 45∶55 |
a Reaction conditions: aldehyde (0.5 mmol), nitroethane (2.0 mmol), catalyst 3 (4.0%), and CH3OH (1.0 mL) at 70 ℃; b Calculated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. |
Finally, the recyclability of the catalyst 3 was tested. After each reaction cycle, the catalyst was separated via centrifugation, washed with CH3OH, dried in air at about 25 ℃, and reused in the next cycle. The obtained results proved that CP 3 preserved the activity for at least five reaction cycles (the yields were 89%, 88%, 86%, and 85% for the second to fifth run, respectively). Besides, the PXRD patterns confirmed that the structure of 3 was maintained (Fig.S2), despite the appearance of several additional signals or widening of some peaks. These alterations might be expected after a few catalytic cycles and are explained by the presence of some impurities or a decrease in crystallinity. In a model reaction involving 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and nitroethane as substrates, the catalytic performance of 3 was comparable to other heterogeneous catalytic systems based on metal-carboxylate coordination compounds (Table S3) or superior if reaction time was taken into consideration[21, 29, 31-33].
In summary, we have synthesized three Zn(Ⅱ) and Co(Ⅱ) CPs based on an aminocarboxylate ligand. Compounds 1-3 disclose 3D frameworks. The catalytic performances of these CPs were investigated. CP 3 revealed an effective catalytic activity in the Henry reaction at 70 ℃.
Supporting information is available at
Tang J, Huang C Y, Liu Y Q, Wang T Q, Yu M, Hao H S, Zeng W W, Huang W X, Wang J Q, Wu M Y. Metal-organic framework nanoshell structures: Preparation and biomedical applications[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2023, 490: 215211. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215211
Chakraborty G, Park I H, Medishetty R, Vittal J J. Two-dimensional metal-organic framework materials: Synthesis, structures, properties and applications[J]. Chem. Rev., 2021, 121(7): 3751-3891. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01049
Gong W, Chen Z J, Dong J Q, Liu Y, Cui Y. Chiral metal-organic frameworks[J]. Chem. Rev., 2022, 122(9): 9078-9144. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00740
Xu X M, Wei Q H, Xi Z S, Zhao D F, Chen J, Wang J J, Zhang X W, Gao H Y, Wang G. Research progress of metal-organic frameworks-based materials for CO2 capture and CO2-to-alcohols conversion[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2023, 495: 215393. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215393
Zhang W T, Huang W G, Wu B D, Yang J, Jin J H, Zhang S J. Excitonic effect in MOFs-mediated photocatalysis: Phenomenon, characterization techniques and regulation strategies[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2023, 491: 215235. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215235
Ji X X, Wu S Y, Song D X, Chen S Y, Chen Q, Gao E J, Xu J, Zhu X P, Zhu M C. A water-stable luminescent sensor based on Cd2+ coordination polymer for detecting nitroimidazole antibiotics in water[J]. Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2021, 35(10): e6359. doi: 10.1002/aoc.6359
Alsharabasy A M, Pandit A, Farras P. Recent advances in the design and sensing applications of hemin/coordination polymer-based nanocomposites[J]. Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(2): 2003883. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003883
Gu Y F, Zheng J J, Otake K I, Shivanna M, Sakaki S, Yoshino H, Ohba M, Kawaguchi S, Wang Y, Li F T, Kitagawa S. Host-guest interaction modulation in porous coordination polymers for inverse selective CO2/C2H2 separation[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(21): 11688-11694. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016673
Zhao X, Wang Y X, Li D S, Bu X H, Feng P Y. Metal-organic frameworks for separation[J]. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(37): 1705189. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705189
Wei Y S, Zhang M, Zou R Q, Xu Q. Metal-organic framework-based catalysts with single metal sites[J]. Chem. Rev., 2020, 120(21): 12089-12174. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00757
Gu J Z, Wen M, Cai Y, Shi Z F, Nesterov D S, Kirillova M V, Kirillov A M. Cobalt(Ⅱ) coordination polymers assembled from unexplored pyridine-carboxylic acids: Structural diversity and catalytic oxidation of alcohols[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58(9): 5875-5885. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00242
亢秀琪, 王嘉浩, 顾金忠. 三个包含4, 4'-(吡啶-3, 5-二基)二苯甲酸配体的锌(Ⅱ)、镍(Ⅱ)和钴(Ⅱ)配位聚合物的合成、晶体结构及催化性质[J]. 无机化学学报, 2023,39,(12): 2385-2392. KANG X Q, WANG J H, GU J Z. Syntheses, crystal structures, and catalytic properties of three zinc(Ⅱ), nickel(Ⅱ) and cobalt(Ⅱ) coordination polymers constructed from 4, 4'-(pyridin-3, 5-diyl)dibenzoic acid[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2023, 39(12): 2385-2392.
Hossain S M, Kamilya S, Ghosh S, Herchel R, Kiskin M A, Mehta S, Mondal A. Tuning of dimensionality and nuclearity as a function of ligand field modulation resulting in field-induced cobalt(Ⅱ) single-ion magnet[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2023, 23(3): 1656-1667. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01255
Jeong A R, Shin J W, Jeong J H, Jeoung S, Moon H R, Kang S, Min K S. Porous and nonporous coordination polymers induced by pseudohalide ions for luminescence and gas sorption[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2020, 59(21): 15987-15999. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02503
Zhang Q L, Xiong Y, Liu J Q, Zhang T T, Liu L L, Huang Y W. Porous coordination/covalent hybridized polymers synthesized from pyridine-zinc coordination compound and their CO2 capture ability, fluorescence and selective response properties[J]. Chem. Commun., 2018, 54(85): 12025-12028. doi: 10.1039/C8CC05930F
Luo R, Xu C, Chen G, Xie C Z, Chen P, Jiang N, Zhang D M, Fan Y, Shao F. Four novel cobalt(Ⅱ) coordination polymers based on anthracene-derived dicarboxylic acid as multi-functional fluorescent sensors toward different inorganic ions[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2023, 23(4): 2395-2405. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01374
Cui H T, Zhou J Y, Chen J F, Wang X H, Mu Z L, Chen Z, Xiao H P, Li X, Ge J Y. Two proton conductive coordination polymers constructed by an unprecedented structural transformation of a phosphine-based tricarboxylate ligand[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2023, 23(7): 4903-4911. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00135
Zhong D C, Lu W G, Deng J H. Two three-dimensional cadmium(Ⅱ) coordination polymers based on 5-amino-tetrazolate and 1, 2, 4, 5-benzenetetracarboxylate: The pH value controlled syntheses, crystal structures and luminescent properties[J]. CrystEngComm, 2014, 16(21): 4633-4640. doi: 10.1039/C4CE00219A
Fan X X, Wang H Y, Gu J Z, Lv D Y, Zhang B, Xue J J, Kirillova M V, Kirillov A M. Coordination polymers from an amino-functionalized terphenyl-tetracarboxylate linker: Structural multiplicity and catalytic properties[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2023, 62(43): 17612-17624. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01905
Gu J Z, Gao Z Q, Tang Y. pH and auxiliary ligand influence on the structural variations of 5(2'-carboxylphenyl) nicotate coordination polymers[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2012, 12(6): 3312-3323. doi: 10.1021/cg300442b
Cheng X Y, Guo L R, Wang H Y, Gu J Z, Yang Y, Kirillova M V, Kirillov A M. Coordination polymers from biphenyl-dicarboxylate linkers: Synthesis, structural diversity, interpenetration, and catalytic properties[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 61(32): 12577-12590. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01488
Karmakar A, Rúbio G M D M, Guedes da Silva M F C, Pombeiro A J L. Synthesis of metallomacrocycle and coordination polymers with pyridine-based amidocarboxylate ligands and their catalytic activities towards the Henry and Knoevenagel reaction[J]. ChemistryOpen, 2018, 7(11): 865-877. doi: 10.1002/open.201800170
Huang G Q, Chen J, Huang Y L, Wu K, Luo D, Jin J K, Zheng J, Xu S H, Lu W. Mixed-linker isoreticular Zn(Ⅱ) metal-organic frameworks as Brønsted acid-base bifunctional catalysts for Knoevenagel condensation reactions[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 61(21): 8339-8348. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00941
Martinez F, Orcajo G, Briones D, Leo P, Calleja G. Catalytic advantages of NH2-modified MIL-53(Al) materials for Knoevenagel condensation reaction[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mat., 2017, 246: 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.011
Cai Y Q, Peng Y Q, Song G H. Amino-functionalized ionic liquid as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for Knoevenagel reactions in water[J]. Catal. Lett., 2006, 109(1/2): 61-64.
Meng L K, Liu K, Fu S, Wang L, Liang C, Li G H, Li C G, Shi Z. Microporous Cu metal-organic framework constructed from V-shaped tetracarboxylic ligand for selective separation of C2H2/CH4 and C2H2/N2 at room temperature[J]. J. Solid State Chem., 2018, 265: 285-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2018.06.009
Yu L, Ullah S, Zhou K, Xia Q B, Wang H, Tu S, Huang J J, Xia H L, Liu X Y, Thonhauser T, Li J. A microporous metal-organic framework incorporating both primary and secondary building units for splitting alkane isomers[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144(9): 3766-3770. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12068
Spek A L. PLATON SQUEEZE: A tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors[J]. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C, 2015, C71(1): 9-18.
Loukopoulos E, Kostakis G E. Review: Recent advances of one-dimensional coordination polymers as catalysts[J]. J. Coord. Chem., 2018, 71(3): 371-410. doi: 10.1080/00958972.2018.1439163
Gu J Z, Wan S M, Cheng X Y, Kirillova M V, Kirillov A M. Coordination polymers from 2-chloroterephthalate linkers: Synthesis, structural diversity, and catalytic CO2 fixation[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2021, 21(5): 2876-2888. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00077
Gupta A K, De D, Bharadwaj P K. A NbO type Cu(Ⅱ) metal-organic framework showing efficient catalytic activity in the Friedlander and Henry reactions[J]. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46(24): 7782-7790. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01595J
Karmakar A, Martins L M D R S, Hazra S, Guedes da Silva M F C, Pombeiro A J L. Metal-organic frameworks with pyridyl-based isophthalic acid and their catalytic applications in microwave assisted peroxidative oxidation of alcohols and Henry reaction[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16(4): 1837-1849. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01178
Pal S, Maiti S, Nayek H P. A three-dimensional (3D) manganese(Ⅱ) coordination polymer: Synthesis, structure and catalytic activities[J]. Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2018, 32(9): e4447. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4447
Figure 3 Three-dimensional metal-organic frameworks of compound 1 viewed along the c-axis
The phen ligands are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: -x+3/2, -y+1, z+1; B: x-1/2, y, -z+2; C: -x+1, -y+1, -z+2; D: -x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2; E: -x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+5/2; F: x-1/2, -y+1/2, z+3/2; G: x, -y+1/2, -z+5/2; H: -x+2, -y+1, -z+2.
Table 1. Optimization of conditions for Henry reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde with nitroethane catalyzed by CPs 1-3
Entry | Catalyst | Time / h | Temperature / ℃ | Catalyst loadinga / % | Solvent | Yieldb / % | Selectivity (nsyn/nanti) |
1 | 3 | 1 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 34 | 54∶46 |
2 | 3 | 2 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 55 | 55∶45 |
3 | 3 | 4 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 65 | 55∶45 |
4 | 3 | 6 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 74 | 55∶45 |
5 | 3 | 8 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 83 | 56∶44 |
6 | 3 | 10 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 88 | 55∶45 |
7 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 56∶44 |
8 | 3 | 16 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 55∶45 |
9 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 17 | 55∶45 |
10 | 3 | 12 | 60 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 75 | 56∶44 |
11 | 3 | 12 | 80 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 89 | 55∶45 |
12 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 3.0 | CH3OH | 82 | 55∶45 |
13 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 5.0 | CH3OH | 91 | 56∶44 |
14 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | H2O | 78 | 55∶45 |
15 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3CN | 12 | 45∶55 |
16 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | THF | 65 | 46∶54 |
17 | 3 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | C2H5OH | 53 | 55∶45 |
18 | 1 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 68 | 54∶46 |
19 | 2 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 64 | 55∶45 |
20 | Blank | 12 | 70 | CH3OH | 1 | 45∶55 | |
21 | CoCl2 | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 10 | 44∶56 |
22 | H4adip | 12 | 70 | 4.0 | CH3OH | 2 | 45∶55 |
a The loading amount of the catalyst is expressed in mole fractions; b Calculated by 1H NMR spectroscopy: Yield=nproduct/naldehyde×100%. |
Table 2. Henry reaction of various aldehydes with nitroethane catalyzed by CP 3a
Entry | Substituted benzaldehyde substrate (R-C6H4CHO) | Product yieldb / % | Selectivity (nsyn/nanti) |
1 | R=H | 81 | 52∶48 |
2 | R=2-NO2 | 83 | 57∶43 |
3 | R=3-NO2 | 87 | 55∶45 |
4 | R=4-NO2 | 91 | 55∶45 |
5 | R=4-Cl | 82 | 51∶49 |
6 | R=4-OH | 61 | 55∶45 |
7 | R=4-CH3 | 55 | 44∶56 |
8 | R=4-OCH3 | 23 | 45∶55 |
a Reaction conditions: aldehyde (0.5 mmol), nitroethane (2.0 mmol), catalyst 3 (4.0%), and CH3OH (1.0 mL) at 70 ℃; b Calculated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. |