Magnetic relaxation and luminescent behavior in nitronyl nitroxide-based annuluses of rare-earth ions

Hongdao LI Shengjian ZHANG Hongmei DONG

Citation:  Hongdao LI, Shengjian ZHANG, Hongmei DONG. Magnetic relaxation and luminescent behavior in nitronyl nitroxide-based annuluses of rare-earth ions[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(5): 972-978. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230411 shu

具有磁弛豫和荧光性能的氮氧自由基-稀土离子环形双核

    通讯作者: 李弘道, lihong.dao@163.com
  • 基金项目:

    山西省基础研究项目-自由探索类 20210302124460

摘要: 选用手性氮氧自由基与稀土离子反应, 成功组装了2例2p-4f异自旋内消旋配合物[Ln(hfac)3((R)-MePP-Ph-NIT)]2, 其中Ln=Eu (1)、Dy (2), hfac=六氟乙酰丙酮, (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT=2-(4-((R)-tert-butyl-2-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate)phenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide。在配合物中, 氮氧自由基配体连接2个稀土离子形成环形双核结构。配合物1展现出铕离子的特征荧光。在配合物2中, 磁弛豫相关的频率依赖的虚部信号说明了其单分子磁体的特性。

English

  • Manufacturing electronic devices at the nanoscale is still an infusive challenge. The generation of such devices is stimulated by ever-increasing demand for higher-density data storage and low-energy electronics. In this regard, single-molecule magnet (SMM) is a promising field[1-3]. Furthermore, lanthanide compounds have been demonstrated to be an ideal candidate for construction SMMs. Among them, based on the theory of Long et al., the Dy-compound with a pseudolinear environment could achieve the highest blocking temperature (TB)[4]. In 2018, the current record TB of 80 K was made by a pseudo-linear Dy SMM[5]. Lately, a dinuclear Dy SMM has matched the record[6]. Besides, Ln-radical SMMs are of great interest and have been intensely researched on account of Ln-radical direct magnetic couplings effectively inhibiting the quantum tunneling of magnetization (QTM) of Ln ions. Some infusive achievements have been achieved by virtue of the Ln-rad strategy[7-9], for instance, a binuclear Tb-N23- radical SMM retains a magnetic memory effect until 20 K[10]. In 2021, our group reported a dipyridyl-decorated nitronyl nitroxide-Dy SMM with an effective energy barrier of 146 K[11]. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that these Ln-radical SMMs primarily rely on achiral radicals and the research of chiral radical-based Ln-SMMs is still rare. On the other hand, investigation of lanthanide-based optical properties has become pervasive involving the superiority of Ln luminescence, such as long lifetimes, the characteristic narrow line-like emissions, and high quantum yields[12].

    Based on the above considerations, we designed and adopted a functionalized chiral nitronyl nitroxide radical 2-(4-((R)-tert-butyl-2-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate)phenyl)-4, 4, 5, 5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide ((R)-MePP-Ph-NIT, Scheme 1) to construct two mesomerides [Ln(hfac)3((R)-MePP-Ph-NIT)]2, where Ln=Eu (1) and Dy (2), and hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetone. Structure, optical activity, and magnetic properties were analyzed. Complex 1 exhibits the characteristic fluorescence emission of the Eu(Ⅲ) ion, while the Dy complex displays SMM behaviour.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Structure of chiral radical ligand (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT

    Starting reagents such as trichloromethane and heptane were commercially purchased. The nitronyl nitroxide (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT was synthesized by referring to the reported literature[13]. Elemental analysis was performed by a Perkin-Elmer 240 elemental analyzer. Magnetic property measurement of complex 2 was performed on a Quantum Design MPMS magnetometer. In the light of Pascal constants[14], DC magnetic susceptibility was corrected involving diamagnetism contribution. The fluorescent spectrum of complex 1 was measured by an F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer. At room temperature, the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of the MePP-Ph-NIT radical ligand was gathered on a JASCO J-815 spectropolarimeter.

    [Ln(hfac)3·2H2O] (0.01 mmol) was suspended in boiling n-heptane (98 ℃) and kept in reflux condition for 6 h. After cooling down to 80 ℃, a CHCl3 solution (5 mL) of (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT (0.01 mmol) was slowly added. After stirring for 30 min, the above-mixed solution was filtered. The filtrate was left to stand at room temperature, and navy-blue bar crystals were separated after 7 d. FTIR (KBr, cm-1): 1 776(s), 1 350(m), 1 180(s), 1 161(s), 1 062(s), 948(s), 859(m), 549(s) for 1; 1 775(s), 1 350(m), 1 182(s), 1 160(s), 1 062(s), 950(s), 859(m), 551(s) for 2. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for C76H76Eu2F36 N8O20(%): C, 37.88; H, 3.17; N, 4.65. Found(%): C, 37.86; H, 3.18; N, 4.67. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for C76H76Dy2F36N8O20(%): C, 37.55; H, 3.15; N, 4.61. Found(%): C, 37.57; H, 3.14; N, 4.62.

    Single crystal X-ray data of complexes 1 and 2 were collected at 150 K on a Bruker APEX Ⅱ diffractometer with a CCD area detector (Cu radiation, λ=0.154 178 nm) and were processed for reduction through the SAINT software[15]. SADABS was used to correct absorption effects[16]. Structures of both complexes were solved using direct methods involving SHELXS-2014[17] and refined via full-matrix least squares minimization involving the SHELXL-2014[18]. Anisotropic displacement parameters were devoted to refining non-H atoms. Meanwhile, H atoms bonded to the carbon and oxygen atoms were placed at ideal positions. Additional crystallographic data and parameters for the two binuclear 2p-4f complexes are given in Table 1, S1, and S2 (Supporting information).

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data and structure refinement for complexes 1 and 2
    下载: 导出CSV
    Parameter 1 2
    Empirical formula C38H38EuF18N4O10 C38H38DyF18N4O10
    Formula weight 1 204.68 1 215.22
    Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic
    Space group C2/c C2/c
    a / nm 3.841 85(5) 1.971 30(10)
    b / nm 1.463 76(2) 1.460 68(7)
    c / nm 1.987 06(3) 3.500 61(18)
    β / (°) 114.631 0(10) 95.723(3)
    V / nm3 10.157 6(3) 10.029 6(9)
    Z 8 8
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.576 1.610
    μ / mm-1 9.934 9.080
    2θ range / (°) 5.06-150.476 5.074-149.148
    Reflection collected 54 508 54 749
    Unique reflection (Rint) 10 378 (0.080 5) 10 186 (0.055 0)
    GOF (F2) 0.905 0.902
    R1, wR2 [I > 2σ(I)] 0.080 1, 0.204 8 0.091 9, 0.219 9
    R1, wR2 (all data) 0.088 4, 0.210 9 0.094 2, 0.221 2

    Crystallographic studies show that complexes 1 and 2 are isostructural. Here, complex 2 is chosen as representative to describe in detail (Fig. 1). Complex 2 crystallizes in a monoclinic C2/c space group. 2 is centrosymmetric with one asymmetric entity [Dy(hfac)3((R)-MePP-Ph-NIT)], and the existence of a symmetry center cancels the chirality contribution of the radical ligand to yield meso form, in which two chiral radicals ligate to both Dy(Ⅲ) ions via oxygen atoms of NO groups and carboxylates to produce a cyclic dinuclear structure. The direct coordination between two radicals and Dy(Ⅲ) ions will contribute to charge transfer from the radical π* orbital to the empty orbitals of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion, which will lead to the ferromagnetic Dy-rad (radical) coupling[19]. Besides, the chelate coordination of hfac- ligand and introduction of radicals are beneficial to sensitize the fluorescence of Ln ion[20-21].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Molecular structure of meso complex 2; (b) Coordination polyhedra of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion

    Ellipsoids are set at the 30% probability levels; H and F atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: a: -x, -y, -z.

    The Dy(Ⅲ) ion is encircled by one O atom (Dy—Orad 0.233 9(5) nm) from the nitroxide group, one O atom (Dy—Ocarb 0.237 0(6) nm) from one carboxylate and six O donors (Dy—Ohfac 0.231 9(6)-0.239 4(6) nm) from three hfac- anions. The Dy(Ⅲ) ion forms a triangular dodecahedron coordination sphere (D2d) with a CShM (continuous-shape measurement) value of 0.112, verified via SHAPE software[22-23] (Table 2, Fig. 1). The Dy(Ⅲ)…Dy(Ⅲ) distance is 1.058 6 nm in the dimer unit. The packing arrangement shows that the intermolecular minimum distances are 2.055 3 nm for Dy…Dy and 1.253 nm for NO…ON (Fig. 2), hinting that well separates between molecules.

    Table 2

    Table 2.  SHAPE analysis for complexes 1 and 2*
    下载: 导出CSV
    Complex SAPR-8 TDD-8 BTPR-8
    1 2.574 0.114 2.610
    2 2.948 0.112 2.435
    *SAPR-8: square antiprism; TDD-8: triangular dodecahedron; BTPR-8: biaugmented trigonal prism.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Packing diagram of complex 2

    H, F atoms are omitted for clarity.

    DC magnetic measurement of annular complex 2 showed that the room temperature χMT product was 28.62 cm3·mol-1·K (Fig. 3a), which well matched with the expected value for two isolated Dy(Ⅲ) ions (S=5/2, L=5, 6H15/2, g=4/3, C=14.17 cm3·mol-1·K) and two chiral radicals (S=1/2, g=2.0, C=0.375 cm3·mol-1·K). Upon cooling, χMT product of 2 decreased smoothly before a steep drop at 78 K and attained the minimum of 22.95 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K indicating the depopulation of Mj levels of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion. M-H plot exhibited a rapid increase of the magnetization on the ramping magnetic field without saturation (Fig. 3b).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) Plot of χMT vs T and (b) field dependence of the magnetization at 2 K for complex 2

    AC measurements were conducted in 0 Oe and external 1 500 Oe DC field to reveal the dynamic magnetic properties. For the temperature-dependent data of 2, there were incipient frequency-dependent χ″ signals under 0 DC field on account of QTM (Fig.S5), but χ″ peaks emerged in 1 500 Oe DC field (Fig. 4), displaying the typical SMM behavior. For frequency-dependent signal, χ″ peaks of complex 2 shifted towards the high-frequency district on warming under 1 500 Oe DC field.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) χ″ vs T and (b) χ″ vs ν plots for complex 2 under 1 500 Oe DC field

    The solid lines represent the fitting.

    The relaxation time (τ) was deduced by the maxima of χ″ (ν) signals (Fig. 4b) and pseudo-linear ln τ vs 1/T plots (Fig. 5a), suggesting the existence of Raman, Orbach process and QTM with the following equation: τ-1=CT n+τ0-1exp[-Δ/(kBT)]+τQTM-1, giving C=87.3 s-1·K-3.93, n=3.93, Δ/kB=21.8(4) K, τ0=1.0(2) μs and τQTM=0.33(6) ms for 2, typical of Ln-based SMMs[24-30]. Fitting the Cole-Cole plots based on a generalized Debye mode obtained α values varying in a range of 0.297-0.314 for 2 (Fig. 5b), hinting at the wide relaxation time distribution.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) Arrhenius plot (ln τ vs T-1) and (b) Cole-Cole plots from 2.4 to 3.8 K for complex 2

    The solid lines represent the fitting.

    Employing the MAGELLAN software[31], the direction of the principal magnetic axes of both Dy(Ⅲ) ions was investigated (Fig. 6). The magnetic axes on Dy(Ⅲ) ions are in the same orientation due to the centrosymmetric structure. However, the direction diverges obviously from the shortest bond Dy—Ohfac (Dy1—O6 0.231 9(5) nm), with the 68.97° angular difference. To our knowledge, the magnetic relaxation of the Dy(Ⅲ)-complex could be related to the orientation of the magnetic anisotropy axis. In addition, the combined action of foreseeing ferromagnetic Dy-rad coupling with the diffuse spin orbitals of (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT penetrating the core electron density of 4f orbitals and antiferromagnetic rad-rad interaction through the Dy(Ⅲ) ion, might be able to cut down QTM in some degree, despite the relatively weak coupling strength[32-33]. For Ln-complexes, the magnetic relaxation is fantastically sensitive to the coordination symmetry of the Ln ion[34]. The Dy center lies in a D2d symmetry with a relatively low CShM value of 0.112, which is close to ideal D2d geometry. The above geometry may provide a pathway to shut down QTM and improve magnetic anisotropy of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion. Therefore, the magnetic relaxation may result from the synergy of magnetic couplings and magnetic anisotropy of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Magnetic anisotropy axes (blue sticks) of Dy(Ⅲ) ions in complex 2

    The luminescence of the Eu complex was investigated in a CH2Cl2 solution at room temperature. The emission spectrum of complex 1 was achieved by an excitation wavelength (λex) of 306 nm, which exhibited five different bands at 579 nm (5D07F0), 594 nm (5D07F1), 614 nm (5D07F2), 650 nm (5D07F3), and 700 nm (5D07F4) (Fig. 7). 5D07F0 corresponds to a forbidden transition, hence, its intensity is extremely weak. The magnetically allowed 5D07F1 transition is split on account of the crystal field. The signal intensity of the 5D07F2 transition is the most strong in the red range and in charge of the red-orange emission colour. In addition, during the 5D07F2 transition, the luminescence decay was recorded, which was fitted via a mono-exponential model, I=I0exp(-t/τ), with the decay time of 26.6 μs. Related fitting parameters are given in Table S3.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (a) Emission spectrum and (b) luminescence decay of complex 1 at room temperature

    In summary, two meso 2p-4f complexes with a circle structure have been successfully prepared by the Ln-mediated self-assembly of chiral nitronyl nitroxide radical ligand. Interestingly, the Dy ring displayed field-induced SMM behavior. Furthermore, the Eu ring exhibited red emission in the visible region. Though only meso 2p-4f complexes have been obtained, the investigation of molecule-based materials involving chiral nitronyl nitroxide radicals is still rare so far. To construct chiral 2p-4f complexes, the exploration of other chiral nitronyl nitroxide-Ln functional materials is in progress.


    Supporting information is available at http://www.wjhxxb.cn
    1. [1]

      Sessoli R, Gatteschi D, Caneschi A, Novak M A. Magnetic bistability in a metal-ion cluster[J]. Nature, 1993, 365:  141-143. doi: 10.1038/365141a0

    2. [2]

      Sorace L, Benelli C, Gatteschi D. Lanthanides in molecular magnetism: Old tools in a new field[J]. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40:  3092-3104. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00185f

    3. [3]

      Ashebr T G, Li H, Ying X, Li X L, Zhao C, Liu S T, Tang J K. Emerging trends on designing high-performance dysprosium(Ⅲ) single-molecule magnets[J]. ACS Mater. Lett., 2022, 4:  307-319. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00765

    4. [4]

      Rinehart J D, Long J R. Exploiting single-ion anisotropy in the design of f-element single-molecule magnets[J]. Chem. Sci., 2011, 2:  2078-2085. doi: 10.1039/c1sc00513h

    5. [5]

      Guo F S, Day B M, Chen Y C, Tong M L, Mansikkamäki A, Layfield R A. Magnetic hysteresis up to 80 Kelvin in a dysprosium metallocene single-molecule magnet[J]. Science, 2018, 362:  1400-1403. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0652

    6. [6]

      Gould C A, McClain K R, Reta D, Kragskow J G C, Marchiori D A, Lachman E, Choi E S, Analytis J G, Britt R D, Chilton N F, Harvey B G, Long J R. Ultrahard magnetism from mixed-valence dilanthanide complexes with metal-metal bonding[J]. Science, 2022, 375:  198-202. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5470

    7. [7]

      Demir S, Jeon I R, Long J R, Harris T D. Radical ligand-containing single-molecule magnets[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2015, 289:  149-176.

    8. [8]

      Sessoli R, Powell A K. Strategies towards single molecule magnets based on lanthanide ions[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253:  2328-2341. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.014

    9. [9]

      Li H D, Wu S G, Tong M L. Lanthanide-radical single-molecule magnets: Current status and future challenges[J]. Chem. Commun., 2023, 59:  6159-6170. doi: 10.1039/D2CC07042A

    10. [10]

      Demir S, Gonzalez M I, Darago L E, Evans W J, Long J R. Giant coercivity and high magnetic blocking temperatures for N23- radical-bridged dilanthanide complexes upon ligand dissociation[J]. Nat. Commun., 2017, 8:  2144. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01553-w

    11. [11]

      Li H D, Jing P, Lu J, Xie J, Zhai L J, Xi L. Dipyridyl-decorated nitronyl nitroxide-Dy single-molecule magnet with a record energy barrier of 146 K[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2021, 60:  7622-7626. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00809

    12. [12]

      Jia J H, Li Q W, Chen Y C, Liu J L, Tong M L. Luminescent single-molecule magnets based on lanthanides: Design strategies, recent advances and magneto-luminescent studies[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2019, 378:  365-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.012

    13. [13]

      Ziessel R, Ulrich G, Lawson R C, Echegoyen L. Oligopyridine bis (nitronyl nitroxides): Synthesis, structures, electrochemical, magnetic and electronic properties[J]. J. Mater. Chem., 1999, 9:  1435-1448. doi: 10.1039/a810044f

    14. [14]

      Kahn O. Molecular magnetism. Weinheim: VCH, 1993.

    15. [15]

      SAINT Version 7.68A. Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, 2009.

    16. [16]

      Sheldrick G M. SADABS, Version 2008/1. Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, 2008.

    17. [17]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXS-2014, Program for structure solution. University of Göttingen, Germany, 2014.

    18. [18]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXL-2014, Program for structure refinement. University of Göttingen, Germany, 2014.

    19. [19]

      Kahn M L, Sutter J P, Guionneau S G P, Ouahab L, Kahn O, Chasseau D. Systematic investigation of the nature of the coupling between an Ln(Ⅲ) Ion (Ln=Ce(Ⅲ) to Dy(Ⅲ)) and its aminoxyl radical ligands: Structural and magnetic characteristics of a series of {Ln(organic radical)2} compounds and the related {Ln(Nitrone)2} derivatives[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122:  3413-3421. doi: 10.1021/ja994175o

    20. [20]

      Wang Y J, Wu D F, Gou J, Duan Y Y, Li L, Chen H H, Gao H L, Cui J Z. Modulation of the properties of dinuclear lanthanide complexes through utilizing different β-diketonate co-ligands: Near-infrared luminescence and magnetization dynamics[J]. Dalton Trans., 2020, 49:  2850-2861. doi: 10.1039/C9DT04093E

    21. [21]

      Xi L, Li H D, Sun J, Ma Y, Tang J K, Li L C. Designing multicoordinating nitronyl nitroxide radical toward multinuclear lanthanide aggregates[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2020, 59:  443-451. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02739

    22. [22]

      Casanova D, Llunell M, Alemany P, Alvarez S. The rich stereochemistry of eight vertex polyhedra: A continuous shape measures study[J]. Chem.-Eur. J., 2005, 11:  1479-1494. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400799

    23. [23]

      Llunell M, Casanova D, Cirera J, Alemany P, Alvarez S. SHAPE 2.1. University of Barcelona, Spain, 2013.

    24. [24]

      Liu Y, Anh Ho L T, Huang G Z, Chen Y C, Ungur L, Liu J L, Tong M L. Magnetization dynamics on isotope-isomorphic holmium single-molecule magnets[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60:  27282-27287. doi: 10.1002/anie.202112764

    25. [25]

      Yang Q Q, Ungur L, Chibotarud L F, Tang J K. Toroidal versus centripetal arrangement of the magnetic moment in a Dy4 tetrahedron[J]. Chem. Commun., 2022, 58:  1784-1787. doi: 10.1039/D1CC06265D

    26. [26]

      Dolinar B S, Coca S G, Alexandropoulos D I, Dunbar K R. An air stable radical-bridged dysprosium single molecule magnet and its neutral counterpart: Redox switching of magnetic relaxation dynamics[J]. Chem. Commun., 2017, 53:  2283-2286. doi: 10.1039/C6CC09824J

    27. [27]

      Wang J, Miao H, Xiao Z X, Zhou Y, Deng L D, Zhang Y Q, Wang X Y. Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties of the lanthanide complexes of the pyrimidyl-substituted nitronyl nitroxide radical[J]. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46:  10452-10461. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01037K

    28. [28]

      Liu C M, Sun R, Hao X, Wang B W. Chiral co-crystals of (S)- or (R)-1,1'-binaphthalene-2,2'-diol and Zn2Dy2 tetranuclear complexes behaving as single-molecule magnets[J]. Cryst. Growth Des., 2021, 21:  4346-4353. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00246

    29. [29]

      Shi J Y, Wu M Z, Chen P Y, Li T, Tian L, Zhang Y Q. Terbium triangle bridged by a triazole nitronyl nitroxide radical with single-molecule-magnet behavior[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58:  14285-14288. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01647

    30. [30]

      嵇文杰, 夏成才, 张新宇, 王新益. 基于席夫碱分隔配体的Cu-Tb单分子磁体的阴离子调控[J]. 无机化学学报, 2022,38,1199-1208. JI W J, XIA C C, ZHANG X Y, WANG X Y. Anionic modification of the Cu-Tb single-molecule magnets based on the compartmental Schiff-base ligand[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 38:  1199-1208.

    31. [31]

      Chilton N F, Collison D, McInnes E J L, Winpenny R E P, Soncini A. An electrostatic model for the determination of magnetic anisotropy in dysprosium complexes[J]. Nat. Commun., 2013, 4:  2551. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3551

    32. [32]

      Miao H, Li H Q, Shen F X, Wei H Y, Wang B L, Wang X Y. A family of lanthanide complexes with a bis-tridentate nitronyl nitroxide radical: Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties[J]. Dalton Trans., 2019, 48:  10337-10345. doi: 10.1039/C9DT01397K

    33. [33]

      Xiao Z X, Miao H, Shao D, Wei H Y, Zhang Y Q, Wang X Y. Single-molecule magnet behaviour in a dysprosium-triradical complex[J]. Chem. Commun., 2018, 54:  9726-9729. doi: 10.1039/C8CC04739A

    34. [34]

      Liu J L, Chen Y C, Zheng Y Z, Lin W Q, Ungur L, Wernsdorfer W, Chibotaru L F, Tong M L. Switching the anisotropy barrier of a single-ion magnet by symmetry change from quasi-D5h to quasi-Oh[J]. Chem. Sci., 2013, 4:  3310-3316. doi: 10.1039/c3sc50843a

  • Scheme 1  Structure of chiral radical ligand (R)-MePP-Ph-NIT

    Figure 1  (a) Molecular structure of meso complex 2; (b) Coordination polyhedra of the Dy(Ⅲ) ion

    Ellipsoids are set at the 30% probability levels; H and F atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: a: -x, -y, -z.

    Figure 2  Packing diagram of complex 2

    H, F atoms are omitted for clarity.

    Figure 3  (a) Plot of χMT vs T and (b) field dependence of the magnetization at 2 K for complex 2

    Figure 4  (a) χ″ vs T and (b) χ″ vs ν plots for complex 2 under 1 500 Oe DC field

    The solid lines represent the fitting.

    Figure 5  (a) Arrhenius plot (ln τ vs T-1) and (b) Cole-Cole plots from 2.4 to 3.8 K for complex 2

    The solid lines represent the fitting.

    Figure 6  Magnetic anisotropy axes (blue sticks) of Dy(Ⅲ) ions in complex 2

    Figure 7  (a) Emission spectrum and (b) luminescence decay of complex 1 at room temperature

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data and structure refinement for complexes 1 and 2

    Parameter 1 2
    Empirical formula C38H38EuF18N4O10 C38H38DyF18N4O10
    Formula weight 1 204.68 1 215.22
    Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic
    Space group C2/c C2/c
    a / nm 3.841 85(5) 1.971 30(10)
    b / nm 1.463 76(2) 1.460 68(7)
    c / nm 1.987 06(3) 3.500 61(18)
    β / (°) 114.631 0(10) 95.723(3)
    V / nm3 10.157 6(3) 10.029 6(9)
    Z 8 8
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.576 1.610
    μ / mm-1 9.934 9.080
    2θ range / (°) 5.06-150.476 5.074-149.148
    Reflection collected 54 508 54 749
    Unique reflection (Rint) 10 378 (0.080 5) 10 186 (0.055 0)
    GOF (F2) 0.905 0.902
    R1, wR2 [I > 2σ(I)] 0.080 1, 0.204 8 0.091 9, 0.219 9
    R1, wR2 (all data) 0.088 4, 0.210 9 0.094 2, 0.221 2
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  SHAPE analysis for complexes 1 and 2*

    Complex SAPR-8 TDD-8 BTPR-8
    1 2.574 0.114 2.610
    2 2.948 0.112 2.435
    *SAPR-8: square antiprism; TDD-8: triangular dodecahedron; BTPR-8: biaugmented trigonal prism.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 文章访问数:  283
  • HTML全文浏览量:  33
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2024-05-10
  • 收稿日期:  2023-10-30
  • 修回日期:  2024-01-24
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章