Syntheses, Crystal Structures and DNA-Binding of Transition Metal Complexes Constructed by 2-Methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylic Acid

Min-Zhi ZHANG Da-Ling WU Wei Shen Guo-Liang ZHAO

Citation:  ZHANG Min-Zhi, WU Da-Ling, Shen Wei, ZHAO Guo-Liang. Syntheses, Crystal Structures and DNA-Binding of Transition Metal Complexes Constructed by 2-Methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylic Acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 34(12): 2227-2237. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.271 shu

由2-甲基-4-噻唑甲酸构筑的过渡金属配合物的合成、晶体结构及与DNA作用

    通讯作者: 赵国良, sky53@zjnu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    浙江省公益性技术应用研究计划项目(No.2014C32014)资助

    浙江省公益性技术应用研究计划项目 2014C32014

摘要: 以2-甲基-4-噻唑甲酸(HMTZA,C5H5NO2S)为配体合成了3种新型过渡金属配合物[Co(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O(1),[Cu(MTZA)2(H2O)]·2H2O(2)和[Zn(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O(3)。对配合物进行了元素分析、红外光谱和热重分析表征,用单晶X射线衍射方法测定了配合物的晶体结构。结果表明,配合物1属于单斜晶系,空间群为P21/n,中心金属Co(Ⅱ)离子的配位数为6,配位构型为略为变形的八面体;配合物2属于三斜晶系,空间群为P1,Cu(Ⅱ)离子的配位构型是一个畸变的四方锥;配合物3属单斜晶系,空间群为P21/n,中心金属Zn(Ⅱ)离子的配位构型为畸变的八面体。用溴化乙锭荧光探针法测定了配体和配合物与DNA作用的荧光光谱,结果显示无论配体还是配合物均能使EB-DNA复合体系发生不同程度的荧光猝灭,且配合物的作用强度远大于配体。

English

  • In recent year, the rational design and synthesis of coordination polymers based on metals and organic ligands have attracted remarkable attention due to their structural diversities[1-2] and potential applications in gas adsorption[3-4], catalysis[5], luminescence[6-7], bioactivity[8], electronic and magnetic[9] fields. Extensive investigations show that the formation, molecular structures and properties of coordination polymers are influenced by many factors, such as the nature of the organic ligands, metal-ligand ratio, crystallization conditions. So, it is possible to develop a novel targeted structure with tunable properties through the proper choice of organic ligands and metal ions.

    In the previous reports, extensive works have been carried out by using heterocyclic carboxylate ligands[10-13], because heterocyclic systems are rich in electrons that can coordinate with metal ions, and easily form non-covalent bonds such as hydrogen bonds, aromatic packing, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Carboxylate groups play important roles in many organic ligands, having many different coor-dinating modes. What is more, deprotonated carboxy-late groups could form hydrogen bonds to participate in supramolecular self-assembly with coordination bonds as acceptors. Therefore, heterocyclic carboxylate ligands are potential candidates for novel functional coordination polymers, which offer a self-assembly solution that can be expected and controlled in certain extent.

    Thiazole and its derivatives are an important class of heterocyclic compounds containing N, S atoms, exhibiting a variety of biological activities[14] such as good antibacterial[15-16], anti-fungal[17-18], anti-tumor[19-21], herbicidal[22-23] properties. Therefore, it is worth carrying out the research concerning about mechanisms and bonding abilities between transition metal complexes with thiazole carboxylate system and DNA. The further study could help us to design and synthesize DNA secondary structure probes, nucleic acid location reagents and anti-cancer drugs[24].

    In this paper, a novel ligand 2-methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylic acid (HMTZA) were designed and synthesized, thereby three novel transition metal complexes were synthesized and structurally chara-cterized by some measurements. The interactions of ligand and complexes with ct-DNA were also studied by EtBr fluorescence probe.

    All of the reagents and solvents employed were analytical grade and used without further purification. Elemental analyses of C, H, N were performed on elemental analyzer, Elementar Vario EL Ⅲ. Crystallo-graphic data of the polymers were collected on a Bruker Smart Apex Ⅱ CCD diffractometer. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet NEXUS 670 FTIR spectrophotometer using KBr discs in the range of 4 000~400 cm-1. A Mettler Toledo thermal analyzer TGA/SDTA 851e was used to carry out the thermos analysis with a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1 from 30 to 800 ℃ in air atmosphere. Fluorescence spectra were measured at room temperature with an Edinburgh FL-FS920 TCSPC system. 1H NMR spectra of ligand were acquired with Bruker AV400 NMR instrument in DMSO-d6 solution with TMS as internal standard.

    2-Methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylate and 2-methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylic acid (HMTZA) were synthesized according to literature (Fig. 1)[25].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Synthesis of HMTZA
    1.2.1   Synthesis of 2-methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylate

    Ethyl bromopyruvate (2.6 mL, 20 mmol) was dissolved in absolute ethanol (15 mL). Meanwhile, thioacetamide (1.50 g, 20 mmol) and absolute ethanol (15 mL) were added to a flask, placed in a water bath at 60 ℃ and stirred for about 10 min to dissolve completely. Then, the above bromopyruvic acid solution was added dropwise to the flask. After the dropwise addition of it, the temperature of the water bath was raised to 80 ℃, and the mixture was further stirred under reflux for 6 hours to obtain a pale yellow transparent liquid, then, cooled to room temperature. The solution was neutralized with NaHCO3 (3.90 g).The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O, and the combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatographywith petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (2:1, V/V). Yield: 85%.

    1.2.2   Synthesis of 2-methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylic acid (HMTZA)

    2-Methyl-4-thiazolecarboxylate (3.15 mmol, 0.54 g) was added to the mixture of THF (10 mL) and 10% KOH solution (3.0 mL) at room temperature and stirred continuously for 2 h. HCl (5 mol·L-1) was added until pH=3. The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. Yield: 80%. Anal. Calcd. for C5H5NO2S(%): C, 41.95; H, 3.52; N, 9.78. Found(%): C, 41.87; H, 3.56; N, 9.71. IR(KBr, cm-1): 3 101(s), 1 677(s), 1 500(m), 1 485(m), 1 447(w), 1 411(m), 1 229(s), 1 178(m), 1 109(m), 938(m), 734(w). 1H NMR: δ 2.82 (3H, s, CH3); 8.19 (1H, s, H-5); 10.51 (1H, s, COOH).

    1.3.1   Synthesis of [Co(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O (1)

    A mixture of HMTZA ligand (0.148 g, 1.0 mmol), Co(CH3COO)2·4H2O (0.125 g, 0.5 mmol) and H2O (10 mL)/EtOH (10 mL) was put into a 50 mL vessel. Then, KOH solution (10%) was added dropwise until pH=5. And the mixture was stirred and heated in a water bath at 60 ℃ for about 30 mins. The resulted solution was filtered while hot and cooled to room temperature. After a week, red crystals suitable for single-crystal analysis and physical measurements were obtained. Yield: 40% (based on HMTZA). Anal. Calcd. for C10H18N2O9S2Co(%): C, 27.71; H, 4.16; N, 6.47. Found(%): C, 27.59; H, 4.20; N, 6.42. IR(KBr, cm-1): 3 257(s), 3 121(s), 1 605(s), 1 539(m), 1 489(m), 1 357(s), 1 284(m), 1 197(s), 961(w), 774(w), 752(w), 628(w).

    1.3.2   Synthesis of [Cu(MTZA)2(H2O)]·2H2O (2)

    The preparation method of complex 2 was similar to complex 1 using CuCl2·2H2O (0.085 g, 0.5 mmol) instead of Co(CH3COO)2·4H2O, and concentrated ammonia instead of KOH solution was added dropwise until pH=9. After volatilizing naturally for a week, blue crystals suitable for single-crystal analysis and physical measurements were obtained. Yield: 56% (based on HMTZA). Anal. Calcd. for C10H14N2O7S2Cu(%): C, 29.88; H, 3.49; N, 6.97; Found(%): C, 29.79; H, 3.45; N, 6.92. IR(KBr, cm-1): 3 386(s), 1 638(s), 1 580(s), 1 508(m), 1 444(s), 1 337(m), 1 288(m), 1 185(s), 1 056(w), 853(w), 782(w).

    1.3.3   Synthesis of [Zn(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O (3)

    The synthetic method was the same as complex 1, just replacing Co(CH3COO)2·4H2O with Zn(CH3COO)2 ·2H2O (0.110 g, 0.5 mmol). After volatilizing naturally for a week, colorless crystals suitable for single-crystal analysis and physical measurements were obtained. Yield: 49% (based on HMTZA). Anal. Calcd. for C10H18N2O9S2Zn(%): C, 27.31; H, 4.10; N, 6.37. Found(%): C, 27.39; H, 4.13; N, 6.31. IR(KBr, cm-1): 3 395(s), 3 121(s), 1 630(s), 1 527(m), 1 489(s), 1 357(s), 1 286(s), 1 197(s), 1 109(w), 1 006(w), 961(m), 774(m), 753(m), 627(m).

    The single crystals of the complexes with approx-imate dimensions suitable for single-crystal analysis were selected and mounted on a Bruker Smart Apex Ⅱ CCD diffractometer. A graphite monochromated Mo radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) was used to collect the diffraction data at 296(2) K. Absorption corrections were applied using SADABS[26]. The correction for Lp factors was applied. The structure was solved by using the SHELXS-97[27] program package and refined with the full-matrix least-squares technique based on F2 using the SHELXL-97[28] program package. All non-H atoms were anisotropically refined. Remaining hydro-gen atoms were added in calculated positions and refined as riding atoms with a common fixed isotropic thermal parameter. Hydrogen atoms on water molecules were located in a difference Fourier map and included in the subsequent refinement using restrains (O-H 0.085 nm) with Uiso(H)=1.5Ueq(O). Detailed information about the crystal data is summarized in Table 1, and the selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 2, 3 and 4. All hydrogen bonds are given in Table 5.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1~3
    下载: 导出CSV
    Complex 1 2 3
    Empirical formula C10H18N2O9S2Co C10H14N2S2Cu C10H18N2O9S2Zn
    Formula weight 433.31 401.89 439.75
    Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P21/n P1 P21/n
    a / nm 1.306 31(3) 0.758 24(4) 1.306 77(6)
    b / nm 0.796 37(2) 1.026 59(5) 0.797 75(4)
    c / nm 1.682 79(4) 1.166 17(6) 1.676 67(8)
    α/(°) 65.606(2)
    β/(°) 97.277 0(10) 72.307(2) 97.236(2)
    γ/(°) 70.962(2)
    V/ nm3 1.736 52(7) 0.766 25(7) 1.733 97(14)
    Z 4 2 4
    Dc/(g ·cm-3) 1.657 1.742 1.685
    Absorption coefficient / mm-1 1.274 1.732 1.703
    F(000) 892 410 904
    θmin, θmax/ (°) 1.86, 27.44 1.96, 27.74 1.87, 27.68
    Reflection collected 26 345 25 335 53 181
    Rint 0.056 8 0.057 1 0.063 9
    Data, restraint, parameter 3 952, 15, 217 3 538, 6, 217 3 975, 15, 217
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.055 1.276 1.199
    R1, wR2[I > 2σ(I)] 0.038 4, 0.1060 0.065 9, 0.1645 0.048 5, 0.126 5
    R1, wR2(all data) 0.045 7, 0.1128 0.071 0, 0.171 8 0.057 4, 0.136 6
    (△ρ)max, (△ρ)min/ (e·nm-3) 630, -667 769, -2 900 592, -1 277

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angle (°) of complex 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    Co1-O1W 0.209 55(17) Co1-O1 0.210 58(16) Co1-O3 0.210 53(17)
    Co1-O2W 0.211 51(18) Co1-N2 0.212 4(2) Co1-N1 0.215 0(2)
    O1W-Co1-O1 84.22(7) O1W-Co1-O3 96.57(7) O1-Co1-O3 179.17(7)
    O1W-Co1-O2W 86.17(8) O1-Co1-O2W 91.37(7) O3-Co1-O2W 88.94(8)
    O1W-Co1-N2 174.06(7) O1-Co1-N2 100.17(7) O3-Co1-N2 79.06(7)
    O2W-Co1-N2 89.72(8) O1W-Co1-N1 90.00(8) O1-Co1-N1 77.59(7)
    O3-Co1-N1 102.14(8) O2W-Co1-N1 168.64(8) N2-Co1-N1 94.83(8)

    Table 3

    Table 3.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angle (°) of complex 2
    下载: 导出CSV
    Cu1-O3 0.195 6(2) Cu1-N2 0.200 4(3) Cu1-O1 0.198 3(2)
    Cu1-O1W 0.217 3(3) Cu1-N1 0.199 9(3)
    O3-Cu1-O1 157.49(12) O3-Cu1-N1 96.11(10) O1-Cu1-N1 82.78(10)
    O3-Cu1-N2 83.39(10) O31-Cu1-N2 96.29(10) N1-Cu1-N2 176.37(10)
    O3-Cu1-O1W 102.67(12) O1-Cu1-O1W 99.82(11) N1-Cu1-O1W 90.37(11)
    N2-Cu1-O1W 93.25(11)

    Table 4

    Table 4.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) of complex 3
    下载: 导出CSV
    Zn1-O1W 0.207 2(2) Zn1-O2W 0.212 4(2) Zn1-O3 0.211 7(2)
    Zn1-O1 0.210 4(2) Zn1-N2 0.216 9(3) Zn1-N1 0.213 0(3)
    O1W-Zn1-O3 84.99(9) O1W-Zn1-O1 96.44(9) O3-Zn1-O1 178.45(9)
    O1W-Zn1-N2 90.52(10) O3-Zn1-N2 77.24(9) O1-Zn1-N2 102.13(10)
    O1W-Zn1-O2W 85.55(10) O3-Zn1-O2W 77.24(9) O1-Zn1-O2W 90.33(10)
    N2-Zn1-O2W 167.29(10) O3-Zn1-N1 99.27(9) O1-Zn1-N1 79.35(9)
    N2-Zn1-N1 95.35(10) O2W-Zn1-N1 89.33(10)

    Table 5

    Table 5.  Hydrogen bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) of complexes 1~3
    下载: 导出CSV
    D-H...A d(D-H)/nm d(H...A)/nm d(D...A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    Complex 1
    O1W—H1WA…O1#1 0.085 0.185 0.269 0(2) 167.0
    O1W—H1WB …O3#2 0.082 0.204 0.284 4(2) 168.2
    O2W—H2WA …O2#1 0.081 0.196 0.276 8(3) 173.7
    O2W—H2WB …O1W 0.084 0.213 0.287 6(3) 148.0
    O3W—H3WA …O4#3 0.081 0.198 0.278 0(3) 169.3
    O3W—H3WB …O2W#1 0.084 0.194 0.276 7(3) 168.9
    O4W#4—H4WA#4 …O3W#4 0.083 0.207 0.288 3(3) 167.3
    O4W#4—H4WB#4 …O5W#5 0.086 0.198 0.273 3(4) 145.8
    O5W#5-H5WA#5 …O2#5 0.085 0.194 0.277 1(3) 164.9
    O5W#5-H5WB#5 …O4W 0.084 0.202 0.275 3(4) 145.7
    Complex 2
    O1W-H1WA …O2W 0.086 0.191 0.276 3(4) 169.(5)
    O1W-H1WB …O3W 0.085 0.192 0.276 0(4) 172.(5)
    O2W-H2WA …O1#1 0.073 0.215 0.288 4(4) 179.(6)
    O2W—H2WB …O2#2 0.086 0.192 0.276 3(4) 167.(5)
    O3W-H3WA …O2#1 0.083 0.221 0.298 5(5) 158.(6)
    O3W—H3WB …O4#3 0.085 0.193 0.276 4(4) 171.(6)
    Complex 3
    O1W-H1WA …O3#1 0.085 0.184 0.268 5(3) 168.4
    O1W-H1WB …O1#2 0.085 0.201 0.284 4(5) 169.1
    O2W-H2WA …O4#1 0.082 0.196 0.277 6(4) 175.0
    O2W-H2WB …O3W 0.083 0.195 0.277 6(4) 177.6
    O3W-H3WA …O2#3 0.082 0.196 0.278 2(4) 174.4
    O3W-H3WB …O2#4 0.083 0.214 0.292 3(5) 157.5
    O4W#5—H4WA#5 …O5W 0.086 0.193 0.273 6(5) 155.5
    O4W#5—H4WB#5 …O3W#2 0.085 0.207 0.287 4(5) 159.1
    O5W-H5WA …O4W#6 0.084 0.225 0.275 4(5) 119.0
    O5W-H5WB …O4 0.084 0.196 0.277 0(4) 160.8
      Symmetry codes: #1: -x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2: -x+3/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: x+1/2, -y+5/2, z+1/2; #4: -x+5/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #5: -x+5/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2 for 1; #1: x-1, y, z; #2: -x+1, -y+1, -z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1 for 2; #1: -x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2: -x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x, -y+1, -z; #4: x, y-1, z; #5: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #6: -x+1, -y, -z for 3.

    CCDC: 1830898, 1; 1830896, 2; 1830891, 3.

    2.1.1   Structure analysis of complex 1

    Single-crystal X-ray analysis reveals that complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system with space group P21/n and Z=4. Each asymmetric unit contains one Co2+ ion, two independent MTZA- ligands, two coor-dinated water and three crystal water molecules (Fig. 2). The Co2+ ion adopts six-coordinated mode with a distorted octahedral coordinated geometry, by two N atoms from two MTZA- ligands (N1, N2) and two carboxyl O atoms from two MTZA- ligands (O1, O3) and two coordinated water (O1W, O2W). The O1W, O2W, N1, N2 are located in the equatorial plane, and the O1, O3 occupy the axial positions. The distance of Co-O is 0.209 55(17) to 0.211 51(18) nm, Co-N is 0.215 0(2) and 0.212 4(2) nm, respectively, according with the distance of Co-O and Co-N in the literature[29-30].

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 1 with probability level of 30%

    Intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions is listed in Table 5 (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the non-coordinated oxygen atom O2 and O2W from coordinated water and O3W, O4W, O5W from water molecules in complex 1 form a five-membered ring structure through hydrogen bonds. The five-membered rings are regularly connected to each other, forming a 1D chain along the c axis. Rich hydrogen bonds (O1W-H1WA…O1#1, O1W-H1WB…O3#2, O2W-H2WB…O1W, O3W-H3WA…O4#3) make the molecules further connect into a 3D supramolecular network (Fig. 4).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 1

    Symmetry codes: #1:-x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2:-x+3/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: x+1/2, -y+5/2, z+1/2; #4: -x+5/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #5: -x+5/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Three-dimensional supramolecular network of complex 1
    2.1.2   Structure analysis of complex 2

    Single-crystal X-ray analysis shows that complex 2 crystallizes in the triclinic system with space group P1, and Z=2. Each asymmetric unit consists of one Cu2+ ion, two independent MTZA- ligands, one coor-dinated water and two crystal water (Fig. 5). Each Cu2+ ion adopts five-coordinated mode with a distorted pentahedral geometry, by one coordinated water (O1W) and two N atoms (N1, N2) from two ligands and two carboxyl O atoms (O1, O3) from the two ligands. The O1, O3, N1 and N2 are located in the basal plane, whereas the O1W from the coordinated water occupies the axial position. The distance of CuO is in the range of 0.195 6(2)~0.217 3(3) nm, and Cu-N is 0.199 9(3) and 0.200 4(3) nm, respectively, according with the distance of Cu-O and Cu-N in the literature[31-32].

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 2 with probability level of 30%

    As shown in Fig. 6, the coordinated water molecule (O1W) and crystal water molecules (O2W and O3W) in complex 2 act as hydrogen donors, contribut-ing hydrogen atoms to O2W, O3W, O1#1, O2#2, O2#1 and O4#3 forming the hydrogen bonds. Interes-tingly, the abundant hydrogen bonds (H1WA…O2W 0.191 nm, H1WB…O3W 0.192 nm, H2WB…O2#2 0.192 nm, H3WA…O2#1 0.221 nm) form a more stable eight-membered ring chair structure. The more stable structures further connect the molecules into a 2D network through the intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 2

    Symmetry codes: #1: x-1, y, z; #2:-x+1, -y+1, -z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1

    2.1.3   Structure analysis of complex 3

    Single-crystal X-ray analysis shows that complex 3 crystalizes in monoclinic, space group P21/n, and Z=4. As shown in Fig. 7, each asymmetric unit contains one Zn2+ ion, two independent MTZA- ligands, two coordinated water and three crystal water molecules. Each Zn2+ ion is six-coordinated with two N atoms from two ligands (N1, N2) and two carboxyl O atoms from the two ligands (O1, O3) and two coordinated water (O1W, O2W). The O1W, O2W, N1, N2 are located in the equatorial plane, whereas the O1, O3 from the ligands occupy the axial positions, forming a distorted octahedral coordinated geometry by consid-ering short-range atomic interactions. The distance of Zn-O ranges from 0.207 2(2) to 0.211 7(2) nm, and Zn-N is 0.216 9(3) and 0.213 0(3) nm, respectively, according with the distance of Zn-O and Zn-N in the literature[33-34].

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 3 with probability level of 30%

    Intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions is observed in complex 3 (Fig. 8). As shown in Fig. 9(a) and (b), respectively, a non-coordinated oxygen atom O4 and O2W#2 from coordinated water and O3W#2, O4W#1, and O5W from water molecules in complex 3 form a five-membered ring structure through hydrogen bonding, meanwhile, O2#2, O2#5, O3W#3 and O3W#4 form a four-membered ring structure. It is worth noting that the four-membered ring and the five-membered ring are connected to each other through abundant hydrogen bonds, eventually forming a two-dimensional network (Fig. 9(c)). The two-dimensional network structure further connects the entire structure into a 3D supramolecular network through hydrogen bonding (O1W-H1WA…O3#1, O1W-H1WB…O1#2) (Fig. 10).

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 3

    Symmetry codes: #1:-x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2:-x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x, -y+1, -z; #4: x, y-1, z; #5: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #6: -x+1, -y, -z

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  (a) Hydrogen bonding interaction forming a five- membered ring structure in complex 3; (b) Hydrogen bonding interaction forming a four- membered ring in complex 3; (c) Two-dimensional network of hydrogen bonding in complex 3

    Symmetry codes: #1: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #2:-x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #4: x+1/2, -y+1/2, z+1/2; #5: x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2

    Figure 10

    Figure 10.  Three-dimensional supramolecular network of complex 3

    The IR spectrum of complexes and the ligand (HMTZA) can be seen that all complexes have broad and strong absorption peaks in the range of 3 500~ 3 200 cm-1. It can be seen that there is a stretching vibration of the water molecule (ν(O-H)), indicating the presence of water in the complexes[35].

    In the IR spectrum of complexes, the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of COO- appeared at 1 605 cm-1 (νasym(OCO)) and 1 357 cm-1 (νsym(OCO)) for 1, 1 638 cm-1 (νasym(OCO)) and 1 444 cm-1 (νsym(OCO)) for 2, 1 630 cm-1 (νasym(OCO)) and 1 357cm-1 (νsym(OCO)) for 3, respectively, which shows the presence of monodentate carboxylate linkage. The C=N characteri-stic stretching vibration appeared at 1 489, 1 508, 1 489 cm-1, respectively, which shows the coordination of nitrogen atoms from the ligands. Besides, the peak at 750~800 cm-1 is the C-H stretching vibration of the thiazole heterocycle, indicating the presence of the thiazole heterocycle.

    Thermal gravimetric (TG) analysis was carried out from 30 to 800 ℃. The TG curves of the title complexes are shown in Fig. 11. For 1, the first weight loss of 12.12% up to 145 ℃ can be assigned to the removal of water molecules (Calcd. 12.46%). A quick weight loss in the temperature range of 315~375 ℃ was observed, indicating the framework of complex 1 starts to collapse. Over 490 ℃, continuous weight loss was also found. The remaining weight of 19.57% corresponds to CoO (Calcd. 19.29%). Complex 2 was stable up to 85 ℃, and the first weight loss of 8.52% in the range of 85~130 ℃ can be assigned to the removal of water molecules (Calcd. 8.96%). The second step in the range of 260~272 ℃ with a quick weight loss corresponds to the decomposition of the ligand. Finally, the remaining weight of 19.64% seems likely to correspond to CuO (Calcd. 19.79%). Complex 3 was stable up to about 78 ℃, and the observed weight loss (12.06%) in the temperature range of 78~125 ℃ can be assigned to the loss of water molecules (Calcd. 12.28%). Then, no significant weight loss was observed until the decomposition of complex 3 occured at about 335 ℃. A quick weight loss in the range of 335~365 ℃ is observed, which means complex 3 begins to decompose with the collapse of the ligand. Over 365 up to 665 ℃, continuous weight loss was also found. The final residue weight of 18.98% corresponds to ZnO (Calcd. 18.42%).

    Figure 11

    Figure 11.  TG curves of complexes 1, 2 and 3

    The interactions of the ligand (HMTZA) and complexes with calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) were studied by ethidium bromide fluorescent probe. The experiment was carried out by adding different volumes of compound solution to 10 mL colorimetric tube, which contained 1.0 mL 200 μg·mL-1 ct-DNA, 1.0 mL 200 μg·mL-1 EB and 2.0 mL Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH=7.40). And then, different amounts of ligand and complexes solution (0.10 mmol·L-1) were diluted with distilled water to the scale. The reactions were carried out for 12 h at room temperature. The fluorescence spectra of the composite system were obtained at the wavelength of 530~690 nm with 255 nm as the excitation wavelength.

    The effects of the ligand and complexes on the fluorescence spectra of EB-DNA system are presented in Fig. 12. With the increasing concentration of the complexes, the fluorescence intensities of EB bound to ct-DNA at 592 nm showed remarkable decreasing trend, indicating that some EB molecules are released into solution after the exchange with the compounds that result in the fluorescence quenching of EB. According to the classical Stern-Volmer equation[36]: I0/I=1+Ksqr, where I0 and I represent the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of quencher, respectively. Ksq is the linear Stern-Volmer quenching constant, r is the ratio of the concentration of quencher and DNA. And Ksq was obtained as the slope of I0 /I versus r plot.

    Figure 12

    Figure 12.  Influence of the compounds on the fluorescence spectra of EB-DNA system

    (a) Ligand, (b) Complex 1, (c) Complex 2, (d) Complex 3; r=ccompound/cDNA, from (1) to (6): r=0, 0.05, 0.11, 0.16, 0.22, 0.27, respectively

    From the inset of Fig. 12, the Ksq values are 0.849, 1.684, 1.546 and 0.942 for the HMTZA ligand and complexes 1, 2 and 3. The results indicate that the interactions of the complexes with DNA are stronger than the ligand, because the complexes have higher rigidity to bind the base pairs along DNA.

    In summary, one kind of thiazole derivative HMTZA was purposely synthesized based on ethyl bromopyruvate. Its three novel complexes, [Co(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O (1), [Cu(MTZA)2(H2O)]·2H2O (2) and [Zn(MTZA)2(H2O)2]·3H2O (3), were synthesized. The complexes 1 and 3 exhibit extended 3D framework by rich intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Complex 2 displays a 2D framework by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Complexes 1 and 2 have more stronger interactions with DNA than complex 3, which can release more free EB molecules from EB-DNA.

    1. [1]

      Leong W L, Vittal J J. Chem. Rev., 2010, 111(2):688-764

    2. [2]

      He C B, Liu D M, Lin W B. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115(19):11079-11108 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00125

    3. [3]

      Fukushima T, Horike S, Inubushi Y, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49(28):4820-4824 doi: 10.1002/anie.201000989

    4. [4]

      Xue Y S, Lu J L, Cheng W W, et al. Transition Met. Chem., 2018, 43(1):9-19 doi: 10.1007/s11243-017-0187-z

    5. [5]

      Shultz A M, Farha O K, Hupp J T, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(12):4204-4205 doi: 10.1021/ja900203f

    6. [6]

      Troyano J, Castillo O, Martínez J I, et al. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28(5):1704040 doi: 10.1002/adfm.v28.5

    7. [7]

      Cui Y J, Yue Y F, Qian G D, et al. Chem. Rev., 2012, 112(2):1126-1162 doi: 10.1021/cr200101d

    8. [8]

      Rouf A, Tanyeli C. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2015, 97:911-927 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.058

    9. [9]

      Feng X, Ma L F, Liu L, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2013, 13(10):4469-4479 doi: 10.1021/cg4009587

    10. [10]

      Stock N, Biswas S. Chem. Rev., 2011, 112(2):933-969

    11. [11]

      Lee C Y, Farha O K, Hong B J, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133(40):15858-15861 doi: 10.1021/ja206029a

    12. [12]

      Odoh S O, Cramer C J, Truhlar D G, et al. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115(12):6051-6111 doi: 10.1021/cr500551h

    13. [13]

      Torrisi A, Bell R G, Mellot-Draznieks C. Cryst. Growth Des., 2010, 10(7):2839-2841 doi: 10.1021/cg100646e

    14. [14]

      Jain A K, Sharma S, Vaidya A, et al. Chem. Biol. Drug Des., 2013, 81(5):557-576 doi: 10.1111/cbdd.2013.81.issue-5

    15. [15]

      Salimon J, Salih N, Hameed A, et al. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 2010, 6(7):866-870

    16. [16]

      Belveren S, Dondas H A, Ülger M, et al. Tetrahedron, 2017, 73(48):6718-6727 doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.10.007

    17. [17]

      Narayana B, Vijaya Raj K K, Ashalatha B V, et al. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2004, 39(10):867-872 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2004.06.003

    18. [18]

      Chimenti F, Bizzarri B, Maccioni E, et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17(16):4635-4640 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.05.078

    19. [19]

      Gürsoy E, Güzeldemirci N U. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2007, 42(3):320-326 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.10.012

    20. [20]

      Popsavin M, Spaić S, Svirčev M, et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17(15):4123-4127 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.05.050

    21. [21]

      Ramla M M, Omar M A, El-Khamry A M M, et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 14(21):7324-7332 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.033

    22. [22]

      Wang T T, Bing G F, Zhang X, et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2010, 20(11):3348-3351 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.027

    23. [23]

      Yu Z H, Shi D Q. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 2010, 185(8):1746-1752 doi: 10.1080/10426500903251373

    24. [24]

      Dawood K M, Gomha S M. J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2015, 52(5):1400-1405 doi: 10.1002/jhet.v52.5

    25. [25]

      Peña S, Scarone L, Manta E, et al. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., 2011, 47(6):703-709 doi: 10.1007/s10593-011-0823-z

    26. [26]

      Sheldrick G M. SADABS:Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1996.

    27. [27]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXS-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structure, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

    28. [28]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXL-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structure, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

    29. [29]

      王庆伟, 隋薇, 王亚男, 等.无机化学学报, 2016, 32(6):1120-1126 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160625&flag=1WANG Qing-Wei, SUI Wei, WANG Ya-Nan, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 32(6):1120-1126 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160625&flag=1

    30. [30]

      Zhao J, Dong W W, Wu Y P, et al. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(13):6962-6969 doi: 10.1039/C4TA06537A

    31. [31]

      胡春燕, 肖伟, 陶白龙, 等.无机化学学报, 2014, 30(2):257-263 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140205&flag=1HU Chun-Yan, XIAO Wei, TAO Bai-Long, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2014, 30(2):257-263 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140205&flag=1

    32. [32]

      García-Ramos J C, Gutiérrez A G, Vázquez-Aguirre A, et al. Biometals, 2017, 30(1):43-58 doi: 10.1007/s10534-016-9983-8

    33. [33]

      Starikov A G, Minkin V I, Minyaev R M, et al. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010, 114(29):7780-7785 doi: 10.1021/jp101353m

    34. [34]

      Toh N L, Nagarathinam M, Vittal J J. Angew. Chem., 2005, 117(15):2277-2281 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3757

    35. [35]

      Mukhopadhyay U, Bernal I. Cryst. Growth Des., 2006, 6(2):363-365 doi: 10.1021/cg050537u

    36. [36]

      Lakowicz J R, Webber G. Biochemistry, 1973, 12(21):4161-4170 doi: 10.1021/bi00745a020

  • Figure 1  Synthesis of HMTZA

    Figure 2  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 1 with probability level of 30%

    Figure 3  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 1

    Symmetry codes: #1:-x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2:-x+3/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: x+1/2, -y+5/2, z+1/2; #4: -x+5/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #5: -x+5/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2

    Figure 4  Three-dimensional supramolecular network of complex 1

    Figure 5  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 2 with probability level of 30%

    Figure 6  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 2

    Symmetry codes: #1: x-1, y, z; #2:-x+1, -y+1, -z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1

    Figure 7  Ellipsoidal structural view of complex 3 with probability level of 30%

    Figure 8  Hydrogen bonding interactions of complex 3

    Symmetry codes: #1:-x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2:-x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x, -y+1, -z; #4: x, y-1, z; #5: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #6: -x+1, -y, -z

    Figure 9  (a) Hydrogen bonding interaction forming a five- membered ring structure in complex 3; (b) Hydrogen bonding interaction forming a four- membered ring in complex 3; (c) Two-dimensional network of hydrogen bonding in complex 3

    Symmetry codes: #1: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #2:-x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #4: x+1/2, -y+1/2, z+1/2; #5: x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2

    Figure 10  Three-dimensional supramolecular network of complex 3

    Figure 11  TG curves of complexes 1, 2 and 3

    Figure 12  Influence of the compounds on the fluorescence spectra of EB-DNA system

    (a) Ligand, (b) Complex 1, (c) Complex 2, (d) Complex 3; r=ccompound/cDNA, from (1) to (6): r=0, 0.05, 0.11, 0.16, 0.22, 0.27, respectively

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1~3

    Complex 1 2 3
    Empirical formula C10H18N2O9S2Co C10H14N2S2Cu C10H18N2O9S2Zn
    Formula weight 433.31 401.89 439.75
    Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P21/n P1 P21/n
    a / nm 1.306 31(3) 0.758 24(4) 1.306 77(6)
    b / nm 0.796 37(2) 1.026 59(5) 0.797 75(4)
    c / nm 1.682 79(4) 1.166 17(6) 1.676 67(8)
    α/(°) 65.606(2)
    β/(°) 97.277 0(10) 72.307(2) 97.236(2)
    γ/(°) 70.962(2)
    V/ nm3 1.736 52(7) 0.766 25(7) 1.733 97(14)
    Z 4 2 4
    Dc/(g ·cm-3) 1.657 1.742 1.685
    Absorption coefficient / mm-1 1.274 1.732 1.703
    F(000) 892 410 904
    θmin, θmax/ (°) 1.86, 27.44 1.96, 27.74 1.87, 27.68
    Reflection collected 26 345 25 335 53 181
    Rint 0.056 8 0.057 1 0.063 9
    Data, restraint, parameter 3 952, 15, 217 3 538, 6, 217 3 975, 15, 217
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.055 1.276 1.199
    R1, wR2[I > 2σ(I)] 0.038 4, 0.1060 0.065 9, 0.1645 0.048 5, 0.126 5
    R1, wR2(all data) 0.045 7, 0.1128 0.071 0, 0.171 8 0.057 4, 0.136 6
    (△ρ)max, (△ρ)min/ (e·nm-3) 630, -667 769, -2 900 592, -1 277
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angle (°) of complex 1

    Co1-O1W 0.209 55(17) Co1-O1 0.210 58(16) Co1-O3 0.210 53(17)
    Co1-O2W 0.211 51(18) Co1-N2 0.212 4(2) Co1-N1 0.215 0(2)
    O1W-Co1-O1 84.22(7) O1W-Co1-O3 96.57(7) O1-Co1-O3 179.17(7)
    O1W-Co1-O2W 86.17(8) O1-Co1-O2W 91.37(7) O3-Co1-O2W 88.94(8)
    O1W-Co1-N2 174.06(7) O1-Co1-N2 100.17(7) O3-Co1-N2 79.06(7)
    O2W-Co1-N2 89.72(8) O1W-Co1-N1 90.00(8) O1-Co1-N1 77.59(7)
    O3-Co1-N1 102.14(8) O2W-Co1-N1 168.64(8) N2-Co1-N1 94.83(8)
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 3.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angle (°) of complex 2

    Cu1-O3 0.195 6(2) Cu1-N2 0.200 4(3) Cu1-O1 0.198 3(2)
    Cu1-O1W 0.217 3(3) Cu1-N1 0.199 9(3)
    O3-Cu1-O1 157.49(12) O3-Cu1-N1 96.11(10) O1-Cu1-N1 82.78(10)
    O3-Cu1-N2 83.39(10) O31-Cu1-N2 96.29(10) N1-Cu1-N2 176.37(10)
    O3-Cu1-O1W 102.67(12) O1-Cu1-O1W 99.82(11) N1-Cu1-O1W 90.37(11)
    N2-Cu1-O1W 93.25(11)
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 4.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) of complex 3

    Zn1-O1W 0.207 2(2) Zn1-O2W 0.212 4(2) Zn1-O3 0.211 7(2)
    Zn1-O1 0.210 4(2) Zn1-N2 0.216 9(3) Zn1-N1 0.213 0(3)
    O1W-Zn1-O3 84.99(9) O1W-Zn1-O1 96.44(9) O3-Zn1-O1 178.45(9)
    O1W-Zn1-N2 90.52(10) O3-Zn1-N2 77.24(9) O1-Zn1-N2 102.13(10)
    O1W-Zn1-O2W 85.55(10) O3-Zn1-O2W 77.24(9) O1-Zn1-O2W 90.33(10)
    N2-Zn1-O2W 167.29(10) O3-Zn1-N1 99.27(9) O1-Zn1-N1 79.35(9)
    N2-Zn1-N1 95.35(10) O2W-Zn1-N1 89.33(10)
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 5.  Hydrogen bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) of complexes 1~3

    D-H...A d(D-H)/nm d(H...A)/nm d(D...A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    Complex 1
    O1W—H1WA…O1#1 0.085 0.185 0.269 0(2) 167.0
    O1W—H1WB …O3#2 0.082 0.204 0.284 4(2) 168.2
    O2W—H2WA …O2#1 0.081 0.196 0.276 8(3) 173.7
    O2W—H2WB …O1W 0.084 0.213 0.287 6(3) 148.0
    O3W—H3WA …O4#3 0.081 0.198 0.278 0(3) 169.3
    O3W—H3WB …O2W#1 0.084 0.194 0.276 7(3) 168.9
    O4W#4—H4WA#4 …O3W#4 0.083 0.207 0.288 3(3) 167.3
    O4W#4—H4WB#4 …O5W#5 0.086 0.198 0.273 3(4) 145.8
    O5W#5-H5WA#5 …O2#5 0.085 0.194 0.277 1(3) 164.9
    O5W#5-H5WB#5 …O4W 0.084 0.202 0.275 3(4) 145.7
    Complex 2
    O1W-H1WA …O2W 0.086 0.191 0.276 3(4) 169.(5)
    O1W-H1WB …O3W 0.085 0.192 0.276 0(4) 172.(5)
    O2W-H2WA …O1#1 0.073 0.215 0.288 4(4) 179.(6)
    O2W—H2WB …O2#2 0.086 0.192 0.276 3(4) 167.(5)
    O3W-H3WA …O2#1 0.083 0.221 0.298 5(5) 158.(6)
    O3W—H3WB …O4#3 0.085 0.193 0.276 4(4) 171.(6)
    Complex 3
    O1W-H1WA …O3#1 0.085 0.184 0.268 5(3) 168.4
    O1W-H1WB …O1#2 0.085 0.201 0.284 4(5) 169.1
    O2W-H2WA …O4#1 0.082 0.196 0.277 6(4) 175.0
    O2W-H2WB …O3W 0.083 0.195 0.277 6(4) 177.6
    O3W-H3WA …O2#3 0.082 0.196 0.278 2(4) 174.4
    O3W-H3WB …O2#4 0.083 0.214 0.292 3(5) 157.5
    O4W#5—H4WA#5 …O5W 0.086 0.193 0.273 6(5) 155.5
    O4W#5—H4WB#5 …O3W#2 0.085 0.207 0.287 4(5) 159.1
    O5W-H5WA …O4W#6 0.084 0.225 0.275 4(5) 119.0
    O5W-H5WB …O4 0.084 0.196 0.277 0(4) 160.8
      Symmetry codes: #1: -x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2: -x+3/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: x+1/2, -y+5/2, z+1/2; #4: -x+5/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #5: -x+5/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2 for 1; #1: x-1, y, z; #2: -x+1, -y+1, -z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1 for 2; #1: -x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2; #2: -x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+1/2; #3: -x, -y+1, -z; #4: x, y-1, z; #5: x+1/2, -y-1/2, z+1/2; #6: -x+1, -y, -z for 3.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 文章访问数:  411
  • HTML全文浏览量:  65
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2018-12-10
  • 收稿日期:  2018-06-05
  • 修回日期:  2018-09-28
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章