English

• Cycloparaphenylenes (CPPs) represent the simplest structural fragments of armchair carbon nanotubes (CNTs), characterized by unique radially oriented cyclic π-conjugation systems that endow them with remarkable optoelectronic properties, self-assembly behavior, and charge transport characteristics [1–5]. Although extensive efforts have been made toward the synthesis of CPPs, the first successful preparations were not accomplished until 2008–2009, when three independent research groups reported distinct synthetic strategies [6]. During the past decade, the structural diversification of CPPs was extensively expanded, such as CPPs with varied diameters [6,7], polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) incorporated macrocycles [8–15], donor- and/or acceptor-functionalized derivatives [16–19], and mechanically interlocked carbon nanoring systems [20,21]. These developments facilitated the exploration of CPPs and their derivatives for various applications, such as solution- and solid-state fluorophores [22–25], electronic devices [26,27], and components for the construction of host-guest nanomaterials [28–36].

  In contrast to CNTs, CPPs possess atomically precise structures, enabling systematic modulation of their properties through controlled bottom-up synthesis and structural modifications, such as selective incorporation of heteroatoms into carbon nanoring skeletons, which is appealing to scientists [37–48]. The first nitrogen-doped (N-doped) CPP (cyclo[14]paraphenylene[4]2,5-pyridylidene) was reported in 2012 by Itami and co-workers [49]. The embedded bipyridine moieties enabled both protonation to induce bathochromic shift in photophysical properties and coordination as a palladium ligand. Later, Jasti's group developed a series of aza[8]CPPs (Fig. 1a), revealing that N-doping only slightly modifies the nanorings' properties. However, alkylation of these azananohoops would afford donor-acceptor architectures, leading to significant bathochromically shifted emission but with reduced intensity and less negative cathodic peak potentials [50]. Furthermore, a 2,2′-bipyridine-embedded [8]CPP was developed by the same group to construct a Pd(II)-nanohoop dimer and a bis(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-functionalized nanohoop, showing unique solid-state and photophysical properties [51]. They also exploited the coordinative ability of pyridyl nitrogen in an active-template synthesis of N-doped catenanes [21]. Recently, Quinton, Poriel and co-workers demonstrated electronic tuning of nanohoops by appending electron-accepting pyridine/pyrimidine units at the rim of [4]cyclo2,7-carbazole [52]. Yagi, Studer, Itami and co-workers synthesized highly N-doped nanorings, including one consisting solely of N-heterocycle, and uncovered the impact of both the amount and positioning of N-doping on the nanorings' properties (Fig. 1a) [53].

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Previously reported examples of (a) N-doped nanohoops and (b) host-guest systems between N-doped nanohoops and fullerenes. (c) Present work of N-doped CPPs with controlled size and variation of their binding affinities toward fullerene.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Additionally, the host-guest complexation was also achieved between the heteroatom-incorporated nanohoops and fullerenes [54]. For example, Zhu, Cong and co-workers constructed a fully conjugated thiophene-containing bis-macrocycles, the rigid yet guest-adaptive cavities of which enabled the formation of peanut-like 1:2 host-guest complexes with fullerenes [55]. Drewello, Guldi, Delius and co-workers synthesized aza[10]CPP and its N-methylated derivative, and unveiled their C₆₀ binding affinities in solution and the gas phase (Fig. 1b) [56]. Very recently, Tong, Wang and co-workers synthesized a cone-shaped all-azine carbon nanobelt, which can serve as an outstanding host to form stable 2:1 encapsulation complexes with fullerenes (Fig. 1b) [57]. Comparison of selected properties between these reported N-doped nanohoops and aza[10]CPP derivatives in this work are summarized in Table S1 (Supporting information).

  Despite these achievements, the systematic study of the host-guest behavior between heteroatom-containing nanohoops and fullerenes remains underexplored [58]. The investigation on this issue is driven not merely by the novelty of their structures but also by the need to provide a feasible strategy to introduce handles that would enable the regulation of their properties, as well as to elucidate the key structural factors that govern supramolecular complexation. In this work, we described the synthesis of a series of azaCPPs with controlled size as [10]CPP which would make them ideal hosts to complex with fullerene C₆₀ (Fig. 1c). The impact of N-doping with different degrees on their optical properties and binding affinities was investigated both experimentally and theoretically, which would provide new insight for further applications of strained nanohoops in supramolecular chemistry and organic electronics.

  Our investigations began by developing a synthetic methodology that would allow single, or isolated multi-pyridyl, or 2,2′-bipyridyl to be embedded in CPPs in a size-selective manner. Previous work has shown that CPPs and related derivatives can be accessed by the reductive aromatization of macrocycles containing cyclohexadienes as "masked" aromatic rings [59]. These relatively unstrained macrocycles can be prepared in a variety of sizes via aryl-aryl coupling reactions, which would also be effective in this work. For the construction of 2,2′-bipyridyl-embedded CPPs, however, the most general synthetic strategy would be one that forms the pyridine-pyridine linkage in the macrocyclization step due to the instability of 2-pyridylboranes. Therefore, we targeted nickel-mediated Yamamoto coupling of pyridyl halides as the key cyclization step. In order to leverage previous methods relying on the orthogonal reactivity of aryl halides, the use of pyridyl chlorides over bromides allows for orthogonal lithium-halogen exchange and Suzuki-Miyaura coupling for general access to the 2,2′-bipyridyl embedded nanohoops. Guided by these thoughts as well as previous works, we prepared single pyridyl-embedded precursor 6 [50], C-shaped synthons 7 [60] and 8 [60] by the reported method. We also prepared the key precursor 5b with terminal pyridyl chloride units via addition of aryllithium from 3b to ketone 4 in good yield (see Supporting information for the full synthetic route). The macrocycle intermediates 9a and 9b can be readily accessed by Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of bromide 7 and boronic ester 6, or pyridyl chloride 5b and boronic ester 8 under palladium catalysis conditions. The 2,2′-bipyridyl embedded macrocycle intermediate 9c was able to be accessed under nickel homocoupling conditions (Fig. 2). The final reductive aromatization step using the mild H₂SnCl₄ strategy [61] afforded the desired single, or isolated double pyridyl, or double 2,2′-bipyridyl embedded CPPs in 3% yield for 1a, 5% for 1b, and 3% for 1c, respectively, over two steps.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Synthesis procedures for aza[10]CPP (1a), diaza[10]CPP (1b), and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The structures of these pyridine-embedded CPPs were first confirmed by high-resolution MALDI-TOF MS (Figs. 3a, c and e). The main peak was observed at m/z 761.3438 (calcd. for C₅₉H₃₉N [M]⁺: 761.3083) for 1a, 762.2840 (calcd. for C₅₈H₃₈N₂ [M]⁺: 762.3035) for 1b, and 764.2946 (calcd. for C₅₆H₃₆N₄ [M]⁺: 764.2940) for 1c, respectively. The isotopic distribution patterns were in good agreement with the simulated values. The ¹H NMR spectrum of 1a with a single nitrogen atom doped shows dissymmetric signals, which differ from that of its parent structure of [10]CPP. The characteristic peaks at around 8.8 ppm at a lower field can be attributed to proton A in the pyridyl moiety due to electron-withdrawing effect of the nitrogen atom. Another two pyridyl protons B and C can also be assigned (Fig. 3b). Although the double pyridine-embedded CPP 1b which has symmetric distribution of nitrogen atoms exhibits similar signal patterns as 1a (Fig. 3d), the double 2,2′-bipyridyl embedded 1c shows simplified signal patterns due to the highly symmetric structure, resulting in a decrease in the number of hydrogen peaks (Fig. 3f). These results suggested the successful synthesis of the targeted molecules.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  HR-MS (MALDI-TOF MS) and simulated data for (a) 1a, (c) 1b, and (e) 1c. Partial ¹H NMR spectra (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) of (b) 1a, (d) 1b, and (f) 1c and assignment of pyridyl protons. (g) Isosurface maps (isovalue = 0.55 ppm) of ICSS for 1a, 1b, and 1c. Pink and yellow isosurfaces correspond to shielding and deshielding regions, respectively.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Iso-chemical shielding surface (ICSS) analysis was also performed to reveal the influence of N-doping on magnetic shielding and deshielding effect (Fig. 3g). The pink isosurface represents the magnetic shielding regions filling the interior and outward of the carbon nanorings. The enhanced magnetic shielding effect in the cavity of carbon nanorings indicates that the aryl units arrange to form a tubular structure. The yellow isosurface represents the magnetic deshielding regions which are located around the rims of the aryl units. N-doping results in merging of adjacent deshielding regions instead of an alternating pattern for phenyl units (see Fig. S5 in Supporting information for details). This will enhance the deshielding effect which is accordance with the trends of proton signals in ¹H NMR.

  The ground-state geometries were optimized at the B3LYP-D3/6–31G(d) level. Aza[10]CPP (1a), diaza[10]CPP (1b), and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c) exhibit C₁, C_s and C₂ point group symmetry, respectively. Due to the insertion of nitrogen atoms, the shapes of the molecules are no longer regular circles. Aza[10]CPP (1a) is closer to an ideal cylindrical shape, whereas diaza[10]CPP (1b) and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c) are relatively more deviated from the ideal cylinder (Figs. S6 and S7 in Supporting information). Furthermore, multiple insertions of nitrogen atoms would also reduce the torsion angles between the pyridyl and adjacent phenyl unit (4° and 2° for diaza[10]CPP (1b) and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c), respectively) (Table S3 in Supporting information). Although 1a-1c show only slight differences in molecular diameter and dihedral angles, these subtle structural variations exert measurable effects on intermolecular interactions, particularly π-π stacking, in the supramolecular systems (which are discussed in the Host-guest Properties). Strain energies were estimated to be 56.4, 55.5, and 55.6 kcal/mol for aza[10]CPP (1a), diaza[10]CPP (1b), and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c), respectively using hypothetical homodesmotic reaction method (Fig. S8 and Table S4 in Supporting information) [62]. StrainViz analysis reveals that the strain is predominantly distributed around the single bonds connecting the benzene rings (Fig. S9 in Supporting information) [63].

  All [n]CPPs have a common maximum absorbance at around 340 nm and almost no absorbance in the visible light. To gain a deeper understanding of the effect of N-doping on the optical properties of the azananorings, we investigated the UV–visible absorption spectra of aza[10]CPP 1a-1c combined with theoretical calculations by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) [64]. The first excited state (S₁) is still transition forbidden for all three molecules. The main absorption peak (λ_max) was observed at 343 nm (ε = 1.3 × 10⁵ cm^-1 M^-1) for 1a, 345 nm (ε = 1.4 × 10⁵ cm^-1 M^-1) for 1b, and 357 nm (ε = 6.0 × 10⁴ cm^-1 M^-1) for 1c, respectively, which is mainly contributed by the excitation from ground state (S₀) to the second and third excited states (S₂ and S₃) (Figs. 4a-c). Theoretical calculations reveal that the main excitations involve electron transitions between multiple molecular orbitals with corresponding weighting coefficients (left panels in Figs. 4d-f, and Tables S5-S7 in Supporting information). Consequently, it is difficult to examine the characteristics of the transitions by simply using single frontier orbital pairs. To better understand the intramolecular charge transfer, hole-electron analysis was conducted using Multiwfn [65,66]. The analysis shows that electrons move from "holes" (blue regions) to "electrons" (orange regions) upon excitation. All three molecules exhibit a global excitation feature in their main transitions, with electron transfer occurring across nearly the entire molecular structure (Figs. 4d-f, right panels). The fluorescence (λ_em) of 1a-1c slightly shifted to 475, 478, and 483 nm, respectively relative to the emission wavelength of [10]CPP (466 nm) (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). The fluorescence quantum yields (Φ_F) are determined to be 52%, 43% and 61% for 1a-1c, respectively (using quinine sulfate in 0.1 mol/L H₂SO₄ as the standard with Φ_F = 54%).

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Experimental (solid lines) and calculated (dashed lines) UV–vis absorptions of (a) 1a, (b) 1b, and (c) 1c with separated contributions from different excited states. The experimental spectra were measured in chloroform with a concentration of 2.0 × 10^–6 mol/L at room temperature. The calculated absorption profiles were obtained by an effective Gaussian full width half maximum (FWHM) of 0.4 eV. Insets: optimized structures of 1a-1c. The energy diagrams (left panels) and hole-electron distributions (right panels) of main excited states (f > 1) for (d) 1a, (e) 1b, and (f) 1c. The f value represents the oscillator strength. In the hole-electron distributions, blue and orange regions (isovalue = 0.0006) represent the hole and the electron distributions, respectively.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  One of the unique features of N-doped CPPs is their protonated states. Here we investigated the acid responses of these molecules through the steady-state UV-visible absorption and emission spectra. Upon continuous addition of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), we first noted that the intensity of the main absorption peak demonstrates an incremental decrease for all the azananohoops (Figs. 5a, d and g). For 1b and 1c, however, two shoulder absorptions arise at shorter (331 nm for 1b, and 324 nm for 1c) and longer wavelengths (383 nm for 1b, and 392 nm for 1c) as TFA concentration increases, which are different from those of previously reported aza[n]CPPs [49,67]. On the other hand, the emission peak shows obvious red-shifts with Δλ_em approximately 60 nm upon the addition of TFA along with decreased intensity, suggesting that the protonated product is obviously less emissive than the unprotonated species (Figs. 5b, e and h). Note that the emission intensity of 1b experienced a dramatic enhancement at low TFA concentrations, and the luminescence of 1a and 1b has not been completely quenched even at high TFA concentrations. For 1c, however, the luminescence can be nearly completely quenched along with the addition of acid. The chromaticity changes can be clearly viewed in the CIE coordinate diagrams (Figs. 5c, f and i), with photoluminescence images of 1a-1c at varying TFA concentrations shown in the insets (λ_exc = 365 nm). At last, the protonation reaction was observed to be reversible by the recovery of fluorescence intensity upon the addition of triethylamine. To clarify protonation mechanisms, ¹H NMR under acidic conditions and DFT-based calculations for protonation constants (K^H) were conducted. Upon the addition of TFA, remarkable shifts of pyridyl protons were observed (Figs. S2-S4 in Supporting information). The downfield shifts are consistent with the enhanced electron-withdrawing effect induced by protonation. The calculated logK_1–4^H (Table S8 in Supporting information) indicates that the ability for binding one proton follows the order of aza[10]CPP > diaza[10]CPP > tetraaza[10]CPP. When the molecule contains multiple pyridyl groups, increased number of bound protons would lead to weaker overall proton-binding ability, which was also validated by electrostatic potentials (Fig. S11 in Supporting information).

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  UV–vis absorption spectra of (a) 1a, (d) 1b, and (g) 1c in toluene at a concentration of 2 × 10^–6 mol/L upon the addition of TFA. Emission spectra of (b) 1a, (e) 1b, and (h) 1c in toluene at a concentration of 2 × 10^–6 mol/L upon the addition of TFA (λ_exc = 340 nm). Chromaticity change in the CIE coordinate diagrams and insets for the photoluminescence images of (c) 1a, (f) 1b, and (i) 1c.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Considering the similar structures of these azananohoops as the parent nanohoop [10]CPP, which is of particular interest due to its ability to selectively encapsulate fullerene guests with high binding constants (K_a) [28], we next investigated the impact of N-doping on host-guest properties. The fluorescence titration experiments were carried out by adding fullerene guest (C₆₀) incrementally to the solution of CPP hosts, while the concentration of which was kept constant. The fluorescence of the CPP solution was completely quenched as the accumulation of the amount of C₆₀, and K_a was readily determined to be (9.81 ± 0.40) × 10⁶ L/mol for aza[10]CPP (1a), (4.28 ± 0.12) × 10⁶ L/mol for diaza[10]CPP (1b), and (5.70 ± 0.11) × 10⁶ L/mol for tetraaza[10]CPP (1c), respectively by fitting the binding isotherms to a 1:1 stoichiometric model (Figs. 6a, e and i).

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  Fluorescence quenching experiments and visualized weak intermolecular interaction analysis between N-doped nanohoops and C₆₀: Changes in fluorescence spectra (λ_exc = 345 nm) upon addition of C₆₀ (0.0–1.6 × 10^–5 mol/L) for (a) 1a, (e) 1b, and (i) 1c in toluene with the concentration of 2.0 × 10^–6 mol/L. Insets: Binding isotherms and nonlinear fitting according to a 1:1 model for 1a (at 477 nm), 1b (at 480 nm), and 1c (at 481 nm). Hirshfeld surface maps to represent the interactions between C₆₀ and (b) 1a, (f) 1b, and (j) 1c. IGMH maps of C₆₀ with (c) 1a, (g) 1b, and (k) 1c with isovalue of 0.002 a.u. Colouring atoms according to atomic charges of (d) 1a, (h) 1b, and (l) 1c using Multiwfn.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  It can be found that all three N-doped [10]CPPs exhibit higher affinity to C₆₀ than the parent nanohoop [10]CPP. Besides, the binding constant of aza[10]CPP with single N-doping is higher than another two azananohoops. To better understand this result, we performed a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the interactions between the host and the guest species. First, the interaction energy (ΔE_int) between N-doped nanohoops and C₆₀ was calculated, which turns out to be −48.05 (C₆₀$ \subset$aza[10]CPP), −46.82 (C₆₀$ \subset$diaza[10]CPP), and −46.93 (C₆₀$ \subset$tetraaza[10]CPP) kcal/mol, respectively with consideration of basis set superposition error (BSSE) correction. These values are almost equivalent to a weak chemical bond energy, suggesting a very strong binding strength between the host and the guest species. Hirshfeld surface maps (Figs. 6b, f and j) visually present the existence of strong intermolecular forces between N-doped nanohoops and C₆₀ (red region). The interaction energy was further decomposed to analyze the influence of individual factor on the interactions using sobEDAw method (Table 1) [68]. Among the attractive forces with different kinds, the dispersion effects (ΔE_disp) play a dominant role (accounting for approximately 68%). The large, circular, and flat isosurfaces of IGMH maps of the complexes represent a typical π-π stacking interaction (green region) (Figs. 6c, g and k). The experimental values (K_a) correlate well with both isosurface area and ΔE_int, indicating that the binding affinity of the N-doped nanohoops with C₆₀ has a strong relationship with π-π conjugation effect. As discussed previously, aza[10]CPP, diaza[10]CPP, and tetraaza[10]CPP exhibit different degrees of deviation from an ideal cylindrical shape, which may affect the degree of in-plane π-orbital overlaps and the orientation of the fragments, thereby influencing the dispersion attraction (π-π stacking) between the host and the guest. Apart from dispersion effect, electrostatic effects (ΔE_els) also play a certain role (accounting for approximately 23%) in the host-guest complexation process. The electrostatic potential and atomic charge distribution revealed that the electrostatic attraction also facilitates the combination, as the surface of C₆₀ carries a weak positive charge and the benzene rings of the nanohoops exhibit a weak negative charge (Figs. 6d, h and l, and Fig. S12 in Supporting information). Inserted nitrogen atoms enhanced electronegativity which might be one of the reasons why the N-inserted nanorings exhibit stronger binding ability with C₆₀ than the parent [10]CPP. The electrostatic interaction of diaza[10]CPP is the weakest among the three azananohoops, which might be due to the fact that its structure is more deviated from circularity.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  The interaction energy (ΔE_int) for the complexation between azananohoops and C₆₀. ΔE_int can be decomposed into four parts: electrostatic energy (ΔE_els), orbital interaction (ΔE_orb), dispersion correction (ΔE_disp) and exchange-repulsion (ΔE_xrep).

  DownLoad: CSV

  Energy (kcal/mol)	C60$ \subset$aza[10]CPP	C60$ \subset$diaza[10]CPP	C60$ \subset$tetraaza[10]CPP
  ΔEels	−31.66 (23%)	−31.46 (23%)	−32.77 (24%)
  ΔEorb	−11.92 (9%)	−11.88 (9%)	−12.21 (9%)
  ΔEdisp	−91.97 (68%)	−90.66 (68%)	−92.57 (67%)
  ΔExrep	87.5	87.18	90.62
  ΔEint	−48.05	−46.82	−46.93

  In summary, we have developed a synthetic methodology that would allow to access single, or multi pyridyl, or 2,2′-bipyridyl embedded [10]CPPs in a size-selective manner. Due to the insertion of nitrogen atoms, the shape of aza[10]CPP (1a) deviates from a perfect circle less significantly, while diaza[10]CPP (1b) presents as an irregular circle, and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c) slightly takes an elliptical shape after geometry optimization. Multiple insertions of nitrogen atoms also reduce the torsion angles and strain energies. Although the absorption intensity demonstrates an incremental decrease upon the addition of acid for all three azananohoops as expected, 1b and 1c show two shoulder absorptions arising at shorter and longer wavelengths, which are different from that of previously reported azaCPPs. Bathochromic shifts in emissions with reduced intensity were also observed for all three azananohoops under acidic conditions, while 1b experienced a dramatic enhancement at low acid concentrations. Finally, the impact of N-doping on host-guest properties was studied by fluorescence titration experiments and theoretical calculations. All three N-doped [10]CPPs exhibit higher affinity for C₆₀ than the parent nanohoop [10]CPP, with the binding constant of aza[10]CPP (1a) being the highest among them. Analysis of the interactions between the host and the guest species reveals that the dispersion effect arising from π-π stacking plays a dominant role in the complexation, while electrostatic attraction also contributes. Furthermore, both effects will be affected by the minor structural variations in the nanoring structures.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Tianlu Wu: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Jiaojiao Yang: Validation, Methodology, Investigation. Yaru Liu: Investigation, Formal analysis. Chen Wang: Investigation. Jiwen Zhang: Validation. Ren-Hui Zheng: Software, Resources. Huan Yu: Resources. Rui Liu: Writing – original draft, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. Dapeng Lu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

  Declaration of interest statement

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21801004), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2008085QB86), University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province (Nos. 2024AH050709, 2024AH050675), and Peak Discipline Funding of the School of Pharmacy of Anhui Medicinal University (No. 2023xkjd23).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112199.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     M. Hasegawa, Y. Nojima, Y. Mazaki, ChemPhotoChem 5 (2021) 1042–1058. doi: 10.1002/cptc.202100162

  2. [2]

     Y. Li, H. Kono, T. Maekawa, et al., Acc. Mater. Res. 2 (2021) 681–691. doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.1c00105

  3. [3]

     R. Zhang, D. An, J. Zhu, X. Lu, Y. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2023) 2305249. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202305249

  4. [4]

     M.A. Majewski, M. Stępień, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 86–116. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807004

  5. [5]

     Y. Lv, J. Lin, K. Song, et al., Sci. Adv. 7 (2021) eabk3095. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3095

  6. [6]

     S.E. Lewis, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 2221–2304. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00366G

  7. [7]

     Y. Tsuchido, R. Abe, T. Ide, K. Osakada, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 22928–22932. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005482

  8. [8]

     J.P. Mora-Fuentes, M.D. Codesal, M. Reale, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301356. doi: 10.1002/anie.202301356

  9. [9]

     Z. Sun, H. Tang, L. Wang, D. Cao, Chem. Eur. J. 31 (2025) e202404217. doi: 10.1002/chem.202404217

  10. [10]

      N. Grabicki, K.T.D. Nguyen, S. Weidner, O. Dumele, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 14909–14914. doi: 10.1002/anie.202102809

  11. [11]

      X. Wang, F. Jia, L.P. Yang, H. Zhou, W. Jiang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 4176–4188. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00341G

  12. [12]

      K.Y. Cheung, S.J. Gui, C.F. Deng, et al., Chem 5 (2019) 838–847. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.01.004

  13. [13]

      L. Li, S.M. Long, N.J. Selvaraj, et al., Org. Lett. 27 (2025) 6578–6582. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01384

  14. [14]

      W. Fan, T.M. Fukunaga, S. Wu, et al., Nat. Synth. 2 (2023) 880–887. doi: 10.1038/s44160-023-00317-3

  15. [15]

      K. Wei, J. Li, W. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109055. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109055

  16. [16]

      X. Li, L. Liu, L. Jia, et al., Nat. Commun. 16 (2025) 467. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55895-x

  17. [17]

      S. Zhong, L. Zhu, S. Wu, Y. Li, M. Lin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108124. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108124

  18. [18]

      H. Deng, Z. Guo, Y. Wang, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 14080–14089. doi: 10.1039/D2SC05804A

  19. [19]

      S. Chen, C. Zhang, X. Dong, H.J. Zhang, J. Lin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110354. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110354

  20. [20]

      Y. Segawa, M. Kuwayama, Y. Hijikata, et al., Science 365 (2019) 272–276. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5021

  21. [21]

      J.H. May, J.M. Van Raden, R.L. Maust, L.N. Zakharov, R. Jasti, Nat. Chem. 15 (2023) 170–176. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-01106-9

  22. [22]

      P. Della Sala, A. Capobianco, T. Caruso, et al., J. Org. Chem. 83 (2018) 220– 227. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02590

  23. [23]

      P.C. Hall, H.W. Reid, I. Liashenko, et al., Small 20 (2024) 2400882. doi: 10.1002/smll.202400882

  24. [24]

      B. Zou, J.A. Li, Z. Zhai, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 27 (2024) e202400135. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202400135

  25. [25]

      Y. Hu, T. Li, T. Su, et al., Chem. Sci. 16 (2025) 13115–13121. doi: 10.1039/D5SC03476K

  26. [26]

      J. Mun, J. Kang, Y. Zheng, et al., Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) e1903912. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903912

  27. [27]

      P. Seitz, M. Bhosale, L. Rzesny, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202306184. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306184

  28. [28]

      T. Iwamoto, Y. Watanabe, T. Sadahiro, T. Haino, S. Yamago, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 8342–8344. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102302

  29. [29]

      K. Lan, C. Cheng, Sci. Sin. Chim. 53 (2023) 2402–2419. doi: 10.1360/SSC-2023-0170

  30. [30]

      M. Freiberger, M.B. Minameyer, I. Solymosi, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 29 (2023) e202203734. doi: 10.1002/chem.202203734

  31. [31]

      Y. Yang, M. Jurícek, ChemPlusChem 87 (2022) e202100468. ˇ doi: 10.1002/cplu.202100468

  32. [32]

      O.A. Stasyuk, A.A. Voityuk, A.J. Stasyuk, M. Solà, Acc. Chem. Res. 57 (2024) 37–46. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00488

  33. [33]

      A. Stergiou, J. Rio, J.H. Griwatz, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 17745–17750. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909126

  34. [34]

      Y. Zhou, G. Zhuang, P. Du, Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108593. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108593

  35. [35]

      X. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Du, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110249. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110249

  36. [36]

      K.L. Zhu, Z.A. Li, J. Liang, Y. He, H.Y. Gong, Chin. Chem. Lett. 37 (2026) 111629. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111629

  37. [37]

      P. Li, Y. Jia, P. Chen, Chem. Eur. J. 29 (2023) e202300300. doi: 10.1002/chem.202300300

  38. [38]

      X. Sun, J. Bai, X.Y. Wang, H.Y. Gong, Coord. Chem. Rev. 518 (2024) 216063. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216063

  39. [39]

      K. Ikemoto, S. Harada, S. Yang, T. Matsuno, H. Isobe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202114305. doi: 10.1002/anie.202114305

  40. [40]

      M. Zhu, Q. Zhou, H. Cheng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202213470. doi: 10.1002/anie.202213470

  41. [41]

      M. Chen, K.S. Unikela, R. Ramalakshmi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 1556–1560. doi: 10.1002/anie.202010556

  42. [42]

      J. Nogami, D. Hashizume, Y. Nagashima, et al., Nat. Synth. 2 (2023) 888–897. doi: 10.1038/s44160-023-00318-2

  43. [43]

      S. Qiu, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, et al., CCS Chem. 5 (2023) 1763–1772. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.023.202302830

  44. [44]

      S.H. Röttger, P.A. Mader, H.F. von Köller, P.G. Jones, D.B. Werz, Org. Lett. 27 (2025) 4969–4973. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01301

  45. [45]

      Y. Wang, S. Huang, Z. Zhang, X. Yan, J. Org. Chem. 89 (2024) 681–686. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01323

  46. [46]

      H. Zhang, J. Lin, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 42 (2022) 3437. doi: 10.6023/cjoc202205006

  47. [47]

      Y. Xu, M.Y. Leung, L. Yan, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 13226–13235. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c01243

  48. [48]

      X.W. Chen, Q.S. Deng, B.H. Zheng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 31665–31670. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c10068

  49. [49]

      K. Matsui, Y. Segawa, K. Itami, Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 1888–1891. doi: 10.1021/ol3005112

  50. [50]

      E.R. Darzi, E.S. Hirst, C.D. Weber, et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 1 (2015) 335–342. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00269

  51. [51]

      J.M. Van Raden, S. Louie, L.N. Zakharov, R. Jasti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 2936–2939. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00359

  52. [52]

      C. Brouillac, N. McIntosh, B. Heinrich, et al., Adv. Sci. 11 (2024) e2309115. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309115

  53. [53]

      T. Drennhaus, D. Imoto, E.S. Horst, et al., Nat. Commun. 16 (2025) 4643. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59934-5

  54. [54]

      J. Xie, X. Li, Z. Du, Y. Liu, K. Zhu, CCS Chem. 5 (2023) 958–970. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.022.202202019

  55. [55]

      L. Zhan, C. Dai, G. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202113334. doi: 10.1002/anie.202113334

  56. [56]

      F. Schwer, S. Zank, M. Freiberger, et al., Org. Mater. 4 (2022) 7–17. doi: 10.1055/a-1814-7686

  57. [57]

      J.H. Chen, T.Y. Huang, S. Tong, M.X. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147 (2025) 1595–1603. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c11468

  58. [58]

      I. González-Veloso, J. Rodríguez-Otero, E.M. Cabaleiro-Lago, Struct. Chem. 30 (2018) 647–656.

  59. [59]

      D. Wu, W. Cheng, X.T. Ban, J.L. Xia, Asian J. Org. Chem. 7 (2018) 2161–2181. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201800397

  60. [60]

      J. Xia, J.W. Bacon, R. Jasti, Chem. Sci. 3 (2012) 3018–3021. doi: 10.1039/c2sc20719b

  61. [61]

      V.K. Patel, E. Kayahara, S. Yamago, Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 5742–5749. doi: 10.1002/chem.201406650

  62. [62]

      Y. Segawa, H. Omachi, K. Itami, Org. Lett. 12 (2010) 2262–2265. doi: 10.1021/ol1006168

  63. [63]

      C.E. Colwell, T.W. Price, T. Stauch, R. Jasti, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 3923–3930. doi: 10.1039/D0SC00629G

  64. [64]

      R. Franklin-Mergarejo, D.O. Alvarez, S. Tretiak, S. Fernandez-Alberti, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 31253. doi: 10.1038/srep31253

  65. [65]

      T. Lu, F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (2012) 580–592. doi: 10.1002/jcc.22885

  66. [66]

      T. Lu, Section 3.21.8 of Multiwfn manual Version 3.8, 2024 (accessed 23/08) available at http://sobereva.com/multiwfn.

  67. [67]

      D.A. Hines, E.R. Darzi, E.S. Hirst, R. Jasti, P.V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. A 119 (2015) 8083–8089. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b04404

  68. [68]

      T. Lu, Q. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. A 127 (2023) 7023–7035. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04374

• 

  Figure 1  Previously reported examples of (a) N-doped nanohoops and (b) host-guest systems between N-doped nanohoops and fullerenes. (c) Present work of N-doped CPPs with controlled size and variation of their binding affinities toward fullerene.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Synthesis procedures for aza[10]CPP (1a), diaza[10]CPP (1b), and tetraaza[10]CPP (1c).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  HR-MS (MALDI-TOF MS) and simulated data for (a) 1a, (c) 1b, and (e) 1c. Partial ¹H NMR spectra (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) of (b) 1a, (d) 1b, and (f) 1c and assignment of pyridyl protons. (g) Isosurface maps (isovalue = 0.55 ppm) of ICSS for 1a, 1b, and 1c. Pink and yellow isosurfaces correspond to shielding and deshielding regions, respectively.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Experimental (solid lines) and calculated (dashed lines) UV–vis absorptions of (a) 1a, (b) 1b, and (c) 1c with separated contributions from different excited states. The experimental spectra were measured in chloroform with a concentration of 2.0 × 10^–6 mol/L at room temperature. The calculated absorption profiles were obtained by an effective Gaussian full width half maximum (FWHM) of 0.4 eV. Insets: optimized structures of 1a-1c. The energy diagrams (left panels) and hole-electron distributions (right panels) of main excited states (f > 1) for (d) 1a, (e) 1b, and (f) 1c. The f value represents the oscillator strength. In the hole-electron distributions, blue and orange regions (isovalue = 0.0006) represent the hole and the electron distributions, respectively.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  UV–vis absorption spectra of (a) 1a, (d) 1b, and (g) 1c in toluene at a concentration of 2 × 10^–6 mol/L upon the addition of TFA. Emission spectra of (b) 1a, (e) 1b, and (h) 1c in toluene at a concentration of 2 × 10^–6 mol/L upon the addition of TFA (λ_exc = 340 nm). Chromaticity change in the CIE coordinate diagrams and insets for the photoluminescence images of (c) 1a, (f) 1b, and (i) 1c.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Fluorescence quenching experiments and visualized weak intermolecular interaction analysis between N-doped nanohoops and C₆₀: Changes in fluorescence spectra (λ_exc = 345 nm) upon addition of C₆₀ (0.0–1.6 × 10^–5 mol/L) for (a) 1a, (e) 1b, and (i) 1c in toluene with the concentration of 2.0 × 10^–6 mol/L. Insets: Binding isotherms and nonlinear fitting according to a 1:1 model for 1a (at 477 nm), 1b (at 480 nm), and 1c (at 481 nm). Hirshfeld surface maps to represent the interactions between C₆₀ and (b) 1a, (f) 1b, and (j) 1c. IGMH maps of C₆₀ with (c) 1a, (g) 1b, and (k) 1c with isovalue of 0.002 a.u. Colouring atoms according to atomic charges of (d) 1a, (h) 1b, and (l) 1c using Multiwfn.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  The interaction energy (ΔE_int) for the complexation between azananohoops and C₆₀. ΔE_int can be decomposed into four parts: electrostatic energy (ΔE_els), orbital interaction (ΔE_orb), dispersion correction (ΔE_disp) and exchange-repulsion (ΔE_xrep).

  Energy (kcal/mol)	C60$ \subset$aza[10]CPP	C60$ \subset$diaza[10]CPP	C60$ \subset$tetraaza[10]CPP
  ΔEels	−31.66 (23%)	−31.46 (23%)	−32.77 (24%)
  ΔEorb	−11.92 (9%)	−11.88 (9%)	−12.21 (9%)
  ΔEdisp	−91.97 (68%)	−90.66 (68%)	−92.57 (67%)
  ΔExrep	87.5	87.18	90.62
  ΔEint	−48.05	−46.82	−46.93

  下载: 导出CSV
•