English

• In the current realm of environmental and energy research, the coexistence of diverse pollutants and energy-related challenges necessitates the development of innovative approaches [1]. Among these concerns, the contamination caused by antibiotics and the escalating atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels stand out as two of the most critical issues [2]. Tetracycline hydrochloride (TC-HCl), as a common antibiotic, has been effectively utilized in treating bacterial infections in animals [2,3]. However, the abuse and incomplete metabolism of tetracycline have made it an emerging source of water pollution, posing a significant threat to animal health and ecological friendliness [4–7]. Simultaneously, the continuous increase in atmospheric CO₂ concentration, predominantly due to fossil fuel combustion, has triggered global warming and a cascade of associated environmental problems [8]. Converting CO₂ into valuable fuels is considered a promising strategy to mitigate both the energy crisis and the greenhouse effect [9]. However, conventional methods for antibiotic degradation and CO₂ reduction suffer from several limitations, including low catalytic efficiency, extended treatment durations, and high processing costs [8]. Therefore, the integrated process of efficiently degrading antibiotics while reducing CO₂ into fuel has emerged as a focal point of research, aiming to tackle both environmental pollution and the energy crisis.

  At present, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) including photocatalysis, piezocatalysis, piezo-photocatalysis, provide green and efficient solutions for decomposing antibiotics [4]. Photocatalysis can make full use of light energy to convert into chemical energy, forming electron and hole pairs on the catalyst surface [1]. The strong oxidation ability of holes is enough to directly decompose antibiotics, and the strong reducing property of electrons can reduce CO₂ to usable fuel [2]. Nevertheless, the development of highly efficient photocatalysts has been hampered by the rapid recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and the constraints imposed by the light environment [3]. The piezo-photocatalytic technology that utilizes the piezoelectric effect of materials to promote photocatalytic reactions can compensate for the shortcomings of a single photocatalyst [10]. In a typical piezocatalytic process, mechanical disturbances induce localized polarization charges in piezoelectric materials. These charges subsequently form an internal electric field, enabling the spatial separation of holes and free electrons [11]. Choosing photocatalytic materials with piezoelectric effect can achieve the conversion of mechanical/solar energy to chemical energy, which promotes more active substances participate in the degradation process of organic pollutants coupled with the CO₂ reduction process [10–12].

  Recently, more and more researches have revealed that semiconductor photocatalytic materials also exhibit good piezoelectric catalytic ability (piezo-photocatalysis), such as one-dimensional (1D) ZnO nanorods [13], two-dimensional (2D) Bi₂WO₆ nanosheets [14] and three-dimensional (3D) flower-like MoS₂ [15]. Among them, 3D MoS₂ has a thin layer structure, unique piezoelectric properties, larger specific surface area, and more abundant active sites, making it a star candidate for the preparation of highly efficient catalysts for degrading antibiotics and CO₂ reduction [16–20].

  While single piezo-photocatalysts can address the issue of light-dependence and enhance the separation efficiency of charge carriers, their catalytic activity still has significant room for improvement [21–23]. Anchoring metal and quantum dots particles on the surface of semiconductor catalysts can further reduce the probability of carrier recombination and increase active sites, making it an effective method for constructing efficient catalysts [21–28]. Consequently, the surface modification strategy holds great potential for enabling composite piezo-photocatalysts to achieve remarkable performance in the simultaneous degradation of antibiotics and reduction of CO₂.

  As a rising star co-catalyst, 2D Ti₃C₂ MXene can promote the separation and migration of photoinduced electron-hole pairs after coupled with MoS₂ [29–33]. Zero-dimensional (0D) Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots extracted from two-dimensional Ti₃C₂ MXene flakes exhibit better dispersibility, larger bandgap (quantum confinement effect), negative Fermi level, and richer active edge sites compared to the matrix material [34–36]. Various Ti₃C₂ MXene QDs modification composite such as Ti₃C₂ quantum dots/Cu₂O nanowire/Cu [30], Ti₃C₂ quantum dots/g-C₃N₄ nanosheets [37], and Ti₃C₂ quantum dots/BiOBr [38] have been synthesized, and it has been verified that Ti₃C₂ quantum dots can enhance charge transfer efficiency, charge density, and stability, thereby significantly improving photocatalytic degradation, hydrogen production, and CO₂ reduction ability [30,37]. Therefore, Ti₃C₂ MXene QDs modified on the surface of 3D MoS₂ is a feasible method to build ultra-high activity catalysts, which is induced by visible light irradiation and ultrasound vibration.

  Herein, we successfully synthesized the novel Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots/MoS₂ (TDM) piezo-photocatalysts by hydrothermal reaction. The modification of an appropriate amount of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots on the surface of MoS₂ significantly enhances the efficiency of piezo-photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics coupled with CO₂ reduction. It is worth noting that Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots with good conductivity are introduced into 3D flower-like MoS₂, resulting in a significant increase in photocurrent density and a significant decrease in electrochemical impedance. Moreover, the mechanical strain produced by ultrasonic activation directly provides a built-in piezoelectric field, which facilitates the accelerated transfer of photo-excited carriers at the interface from MoS₂ to Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots. Furthermore, the possible mechanism of dual-functional catalytic system of piezo-photocatalytic system is also expounded.

  Synthesis process diagram of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots/MoS₂ composites is shown in Fig. 1. The XRD patterns of TDM0 (pure MoS₂), TDM1, TDM2, TDM3 and TDM4 are presented in Fig. 2a. The main diffraction peaks of TDM0 are indexed to pure MoS₂ with lattice constants α = 3.16 and c = 12.294 Å (JSPDS No. 37-1492), respectively [4]. The crystal structure of primordial Ti₃AlC₂ and Ti₃C₂ are shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information). The FESEM image depicted in Fig. 2b clearly demonstrates the morphology of pure 3D flower-like MoS₂. The particles have sizes smaller than 500 nm and are composed of irregular nanoplates, endowing them with a substantial number of active surface areas [15]. After the combination of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots and MoS₂, the appearance of TDM2 composite does not exhibit significant alterations (Fig. 2c). The morphology of accordion-like Ti₃C₂ MXene and HRTEM image of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots are displayed in Fig. S2 (Supporting information), providing insights into their structural characteristics. Fig. 2d reveals the HRTEM image of TMD2 specimen. It is evident that the lattice fringes with interplanar space of 0.62 nm and 0.26 nm are corresponding to the (002) plane of MoS₂ and (0110) plane of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots [15,35]. Significantly, a large number of ultrathin lamellar MoS₂ stretches into flat surface, which is beneficial to expose more active sites for catalytic reaction. Other SEM images of TDM1, TDM3 and TDM4 are exhibited in Fig. S3 (Supporting information), offering a comprehensive view of the morphological characteristics of these samples. TEM images of TDM0 and TDM2 samples are presented in Fig. S4 (Supporting information). Figs. 2e and f present the STEM and EDS mapping images to explore the distribution of elements in TDM2 sample. The colorful mapping images vividly illustrate the distribution of Ti, C, Mo, and S elements.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Synthesis process diagram of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots/MoS₂ composites.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) XRD patterns of TDM composites. FESEM images of (b) TDM0 and (c) TDM2 samples. (d) HRTEM image and (e, f) element mappings of TDM2 specimen.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Piezoelectric force microscope (PFM) is one of the convictive method to research the functional properties of piezoelectric materials in nanoscale [39]. It can be obtained that the surface heights of TDM2 (Fig. 3a) fluctuate in the range of -172~148 nm and in a randomly selected 2 × 2 μm² surface area. Upon applying a +5 V voltage to the surface of the as-prepared composites, the relative amplitude images (Fig. 3b) and phase switching signals (Fig. 3c) reveal that piezoelectric response is generated in TDM2. Particularly, the piezoelectric potential of TDM2 fluctuates in the range of -1.6~1.4 V, suggests that TDM2 specimen possesses moderate piezoelectricity.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) AFM morphology, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) phase image of TDM2. (d) XPS survey spectra and high resolution XPS spectra of (e) Mo 3d, (f) S 2p of TDM0 and TDM2. (g) Stead-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra, (h) transient photocurrent response (with ultrasonic vibration), and (i) electrochemical impendence spectra (with ultrasonic vibration) of as-prepared samples.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The chemical composition and elemental states of TDM0 and TDM2 were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As shown in Fig. 3d, the presence of Mo, S, Ti, and C elements was detected, which is in good agreement with the results of EDS mappings. Characteristic peaks at 36.5, 160.9, 227, 283.8, and 529.7 eV can be assigned to Ti 3p, S 2p, Mo 3d, C 1s, and O 1s, respectively [33]. Fig. 3e gives the high resolution Mo 3d spectra of the composites. The binding energies of Mo 3d_5/2 and Mo 3d_3/2 peaks in MoS₂ are located at 226.71 and 229.92 eV, revealing the existence of Mo³⁺ in TDM [18]. The Mo 3d peaks of TDM2 shift to 226.43 and 229.57 eV, respectively, indicating that the strong interaction is emerged between MoS₂ and MXene quantum dots. The S 2p spectra of TDM0 and TDM2 are displayed in Fig. 3f. The two peaks in TDM2 sample situated at 159.38 and 160.61 eV can be ascribed to S 2p_3/2 and S 2p_1/2, respectively, which is slightly lower than pure MoS₂ (159.64 and 160.8 eV) [22]. Fig. S5 depicts the N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms of TDM0 and TDM2. The typical IV isotherm illustrates the mesoporous properties of the composites [28].

  The transfer and recombination of photogenerated charges were investigated by PL spectroscopy (Fig. 3g). The absorption peak intensity of TDM2 samples was significantly lower than TDM0, indicating that charge and hole recombination ability are effectively inhibited. The separation efficiency of photo-generated holes and electrons is characterized by the transient photocurrent response (I-t curves, measured under light with ultrasonic vibration), as shown in Fig. 3h. TDM2 exhibited higher photocurrent intensity than TDM0, which is ascribed to the rapid migration of electrons from the conduction band of MoS₂ to Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots [35]. For comparison, the photocurrent density images of TDM0 and TDM2 without ultrasonic vibration are shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). This result indicates that ultrasonic vibration can effectively increase the transfer rate of photo-generated carriers. The charge recombination/transfer behavior (Fig. 3i) of TDM0 and TDM2 is confirmed by electrochemical impendence spectra (with ultrasonic vibration). The arc radius of TDM2 was smaller than TDM0, which implies a fast interfacial charge-transfer process and more effective separation of photo-induced carriers [36]. The UV-vis diffused reflectance spectra (DRS) of TDM0 and TDM2 are shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information).

  Fig. 4 presents the decomposition curves and reaction rate constants of TC-HCl (20 mg/L) degradation under different condition (visible light, ultrasonic activation, both visible light and ultrasonic vibration), which reveals the piezocatalytic process, photocatalytic reaction and piezo-photocatalysis of composites. All adsorption effects are eliminated before degradation experiments by stirring the mixtures in the dark for 45 min. The chemical stability of TC-HCl molecules is confirmed by the blank experiment in all degradation situations.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Degradation curves and corresponding reaction rate constant of TDM0 (MoS2), TDM1, TDM2, TDM3, and TDM4 samples (TC-HCl, 20 mg/L) under different conditions of (a, d) photocatalysis, (b, e) piezocatalysis, and (c, f) piezo-photocatalysis. (g) Comparison of TC-HCl degradation rate constants in the reported reference.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As depicted in Figs. 4a and d, the photocatalytic performance was evaluated by removal of TC-HCl under visible light irradiation. Obviously, the synthesized TDM composites have stronger photocatalytic performance than MoS₂. Specifically, TDM2 demonstrated a higher degradation activity with a reaction rate constant of 0.068 min^-1, surpassing that of TDM0 (0.023 min^-1). Under the same experimental conditions, the degradation ratios of TC-HCl for TDM1, TDM3, and TDM4 were approximately 67%, 71%, and 61%, respectively. The corresponding values of reaction rate were 0.037, 0.044, and 0.031 min^-1. The piezocatalytic performance (Figs. 4b and e) of as-prepared samples is assessed by the degradation of TC-HCl under ultrasonic vibration in the dark. The TDM2 sample demonstrates an optimal piezocatalytic degradation efficiency, achieving 72% degradation of TC-HCl within 18 min. The raised catalytic activity illustrates that piezoelectric effect generated by vibrating MoS₂ is enhanced in the heterostructures [10].

  The piezo-phototronic effect realizes the piezoelectric conversion and photoelectric conversion, which plays the essential role in the piezo-photocatalytic system [23]. The piezo-photocatalytic activity was appraised under the combined action of visible light irradiation and ultrasonic vibration for the decomposition of TC-HCl in aqueous solution (Figs. 4c and f). The enhanced catalytic ability of TDM samples in piezo-photocatalytic system reflects the piezo-phototronic effect remarkably improve the catalytic performance of as-prepared composites. It is gratifying that TC-HCl molecules were completely degradation with a rate of 0.178 min^-1 over TDM2, far better than TDM0, TDM1, TDM3, and TDM4. This result indicates that the local surface piezoelectric field initiated by ultrasonic vibration in TDM2 accelerates the separation and migration of photoinduced carriers in the TC-HCl degradation process, resulting in more piezo-photoelectrons participating in the piezo-photocatalytic reaction [39]. Compared with the TDM2 sample, the lower catalytic performance of the TDM1 sample is due to the lower loading of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots, which limits the migration of photogenerated electrons to quantum dots. The low catalytic performance of TDM3 samples is attributed to the high loading of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots, which hinders the light absorption of MoS₂ and covers the catalytic active sites [14,27]. The temporal UV-vis absorption spectral (Fig. S8 in Supporting information) reflects the entire piezo-photocatalytic process of TC-HCl decomposition in the presence of TDM2 powders.

  The main oxidative species in the catalytic degradation reaction were detected by free radicals trapping experiments [40], as given in Fig. S9 (Supporting information). The stability property of TDM2 was assessed by repeating 5 times in the piezo-photocatalytic tests (Fig. S10 in Supporting information). After 5 cycles of piezo-photocatalysis, the catalytic activity decreased by less than 10%. This result further confirms that the built-in piezoelectric field induced by ultrasound can sustain the separation of photogenerated carriers and facilitate the migration of electrons [41].

  Fig. 4g provides a comprehensive summary of recent research findings regarding the reaction rate constants of tetracycline hydrochloride under various catalytic systems [1,3–5,7,14,19,20,42–49]. More detailed catalytic decomposition information is summarized in Table S1 (Supporting information). The structural stability of TDM2 is exhibited by comparing the XRD and SEM before and after use [50], as shown in Figs. S11 and S12 (Supporting information). The comparison shows that after 5 cycles of tests, the structure of the TDM composite material did not change significantly. The decrease in catalytic performance may be caused by the adsorption of pollutants. Through these comparisons, any potential structural changes can be accurately identified, providing valuable insights into the durability and reliability of the TDM2 catalyst in practical applications.

  The TDM composites not only demonstrate extremely high catalytic performance in the degradation of tetracycline, but also show better performance during the simultaneous reduction of CO₂ to CO [9]. Figs. 5a-c show the amount of CO generated by TDM in different catalytic scenarios (photocatalysis, piezocatalysis, and piezo-photocatalysis), respectively. Among these, the TDM2 sample consistently showcased the most outstanding catalytic activity. Within a period of 5 h, the CO yields for TDM2 reached 68.2, 39.6, and 136.4 µmol/g under photocatalysis, piezocatalysis, and piezo-photocatalysis, respectively.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  CO yield of (a) photocatalysis, (b) piezocatalysis, and (c) piezo-photocatalysis of as-prepared samples. (d) The isotope-labelled ¹³CO₂ experiment. (e) Photoredox activity of TDM0 and TDM2 under various reaction conditions. (f) The piezo-photocatalytic CO yields after 5 h reaction in 5 consequtive runs of TDM2.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Since the decomposition of tetracycline also produces a small amount of CO and CO₂, the ¹³CO₂ labeling experiment (Fig. 5d) was used to detect the source of CO₂. Once ¹³CO₂ in the system was employed as the reaction gas, ¹³CO (m/z = 29) can be observed. If the CO₂ produced by the decomposition of tetracycline was utilized as the reaction gas, ¹²CO (m/z = 28) were obtained [2]. It can be observed from the figure that both ¹³CO (m/z = 29) and a small amount of ¹²CO (m/z = 28) were present. This observation strongly indicates that both the initially introduced CO₂ and the CO₂ generated during the degradation of tetracycline participated in the overall reaction.

  The CO yield rates of TDM0 and TDM2 samples in different reaction systems (photocatalysis, piezocatalysis, and piezo-photocatalysis) are shown in Fig. 5e. The CO yield rates of TDM0 in photocatalysis, piezocatalysis and piezo-photocatalysis systems are 6.1, 4.3 and 9 µmol g^-1 h^-1, while the CO yield rates of TDM2 are 17.4, 9.5 and 28 µmol g^-1 h^-1, respectively. The optimal TDM2 sample is 4.6 and 6.5 times that of TDM0 in single photocatalysis and piezocatalysis, respectively. The cycling stability of the TDM2 sample was verified by 5 times consecutive CO₂ reduction experiments (Fig. 5f) [51]. The output of CO decreased from 138 µmol/g to 113 µmol/g, indicating that the sample has strong cycling stability. The observed reduction in CO production can likely be attributed to the adsorption of organic pollutants during the cyclic process, as well as potential losses incurred during the cleaning and drying steps [52].

  The crystallographic representations of MoS₂ are displayed in Fig. S13 (Supporting information). It can be observed from the side view crystallography that each unit cell is asymmetrically composed by two S atoms on the left and one Mo atom on the right. The MoS₂ reveals single layer of Mo between two S layers with identical bonding length of Mo-S ≈ 2.418 Å to form a hexagonal structure (top view). The side view further illustrates the free strain characteristics of the Mo-2S dipoles, along with the tensile and compressive strains that occur when pressure is applied. When the Mo-S dipole is subjected to tensile stress, a spontaneous polarization occurs, with the polarization site shifting from the S atom to the Mo atom along the direction of the bond. Consequently, the built-in piezoelectric field propagates in the opposite direction. Conversely, when the Mo-S dipole experiences compression, the polarization point moves from the Mo atom to the S atom, leading to the generation of an opposite built-in electric field [41]. The electric field created by the external force (F₀) acts as a crucial driving force, effectively facilitating the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes in opposite directions.

  The possible mechanism underlying the piezo-photocatalytic TC-HCl decomposition coupled with CO₂ reduction of CO in Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots/MoS₂ heterojunction is illustrated in Fig. 6. Without energy intervention, TC-HCl molecules, CO₂, and catalysts are randomly distributed in the solution and do not interact with each other. Subsequently, light energy and mechanical energy are introduced into the system. Under the excitation of light energy, MoS₂ semiconductor generates photoelectric charges and holes in the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) (Fig. S14 in Supporting information). Opposite positive and negative charges are generated on the opposite sides of the MoS₂ (piezoelectric effect), diffusing along a specific crystal direction [41]. When MoS₂ is subjected to ultrasonic vibration, it generates polarized charges and forms a piezoelectric electric field within or on the surface of the material. The accumulation of polarized positive (negative) charges at both ends of the MoS₂ molecule forces the energy band to bend in the direction of high (low) potential energy. Under the influence of the negative charge on the MoS₂ side, the CB of MoS₂ bends upward (at a low potential), and the strongly reducing electrons rapidly transfer to the surface of the Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots along the direction of the upward bend of the CB. These electrons on the surface of the MXene quantum dots then react with CO₂ molecules, facilitating the reduction of CO₂ to CO [9]. Simultaneously, the accumulation of positive charges on the other side of the MoS₂ forces the valence band in this region to shift downwards, towards a region of higher electrical potential. The holes located in the valence band move along the curved VB, directly oxidizing TC-HCl molecules or reacting with H₂O to generate hydroxyl radicals (^•OH). Finally, the holes and electrons generated by the absorption of light energy move and are consumed in opposite directions along the CB and VB. This effectively reduces the likelihood of recombination between holes and electrons, significantly enhancing the efficiency of the coupled process of TC-HCl decomposition and CO₂ reduction in the piezo-photocatalytic reaction [53]. Under the action of positive and negative charges (provided by a piezoelectric field), electrons move towards the region of lower potential, while h⁺ moves in the opposite direction towards a high potential, forming a closed loop in space. As a result, the electron-hole pairs are rapidly separated through the piezo-phototronic effect of the piezo-photocatalytic system, which is endowed by the combination of the photocatalytic heterojunction and the piezoelectric field.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  Schematic illustration of the charge migration mechanism of TDM2 composite in the piezo-photocatalytic reaction.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dot/MoS₂ (TDM) piezo-photocatalyst were successfully synthesized via a one-step hydrothermal method. Compared with the single-function catalysis reported in the previous literature, TDM catalysts are capable of achieving efficient decomposition of tetracycline hydrochloride while simultaneously enabling stable reduction of CO₂ to CO. Compared with the single catalytic system of pure MoS₂, the catalytic degradation rate and CO yield of TDM2 samples reach 0.178 min^-1 and 28 µmol g^-1 h^-1 respectively, which are more than 7 times and 4 times higher. The uniformly distributed Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots with high conductivity not only enhance the light absorption, photocurrent and specific surface area of the composite, but also reduce the electrochemical impedance. The built-in electric field provided by ultrasonic oscillation serves as an effective driving force to separate photogenerated carriers. Electrons and holes move in opposite directions relative to the external force, forming a closed circuit in conjunction with the piezoelectric field. This work indicates that the surface modification strategies of MoS₂ that incorporate piezoelectric photoelectronic effects hold significant promise for their application in the efficient antibiotic degradation coupled CO₂ reduction.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Ziyu Yao: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization. Huan Yang: Methodology. Luyang Zuo: Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Fang Wang: Resources, Funding acquisition.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgment

  This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U24A2023, 52371191, 52301244).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111595.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     Y. Ai, J. Hu, X. Xiong, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 353 (2024) 124098. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124098

  2. [2]

     X. Li, J. Cao, X. Jia, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 362 (2025) 124713. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124713

  3. [3]

     L. Zhang, J. Cheng, Y. Shi, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 110400.

  4. [4]

     C. Liu, J. Li, C. Guo, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 502 (2024) 157909. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.157909

  5. [5]

     B. Xue, C. Yang, P. Guo, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 30 (2025) 162552.

  6. [6]

     X. Hua, H. Chen, C. Rong, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 448 (2023) 130951. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130951

  7. [7]

     W. Zheng, Z. Zhu, R. Sha, et al., J. Materiomics 11 (2025) 100928. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2024.100928

  8. [8]

     L. Lu, H. Zhang, Z. Sun, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 477 (2023) 146892. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146892

  9. [9]

     X. Jia, H. Sun, H. Lin, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 614 (2023) 156017. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156017

  10. [10]

      C. Xi, R. Tan, Q. Ai, et al., Nano Energy 132 (2024) 110415. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110415

  11. [11]

      D. Gautam, L. Saya, G. Gambhir, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 498 (2024) 154987. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.154987

  12. [12]

      Y. Cheng, T. Yu, X. Lei, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 504 (2025) 158900. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.158900

  13. [13]

      X. Zhou, Y. Liu, Y. Miao, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 323 (2023) 124410. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124410

  14. [14]

      H. Ren, F. Qi, A. Labidi, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 330 (2023) 122587. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122587

  15. [15]

      T. Yu, H. Guo, J. Yu, et al., J. Alloy. Compd. 997 (2024) 174938. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174938

  16. [16]

      Y. Li, Z. Lai, Z. Huang, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 550 (2021) 149342. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149342

  17. [17]

      S. Sun, Q. An, M. Watanabe, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 271 (2020) 118931. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118931

  18. [18]

      G. Qin, X. Song, Q. Chen, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 344 (2024) 123640. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123640

  19. [19]

      A. Negi, A. Chauhan, Kirti, et al., J. Clean. Prod. 450 (2024) 141829. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141829

  20. [20]

      P. Zhu, Y. Li, F. Chen, et al., J. Alloy. Compd. 937 (2023) 168425. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168425

  21. [21]

      B. Shen, Y. Chen, L. Zhao, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 684 (2025) 226-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.01.023

  22. [22]

      Y. Wang, Y. Lin, F. Zha, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 652 (2023) 936-944. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.08.127

  23. [23]

      H. Li, Y. Sang, S. Chang, et al., Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 2372-2379. doi: 10.1021/nl504630j

  24. [24]

      Y. Li, Q. Wang, H. Wang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 537 (2019) 206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.013

  25. [25]

      C. Chen, C. Ye, X. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 7825. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52291-9

  26. [26]

      J. Di, J. Xia, M. Ji, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4 (2016) 136-146. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00862

  27. [27]

      Z. Yao, H. Sun, Y. Hu, et al., J. Materiomics 7 (2021) 1122-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.009

  28. [28]

      Z. Yao, L. Zuo, H. Yang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 697 (2025) 137939. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137939

  29. [29]

      J. Peng, P. Ye, F. Xu, et al., Compos. Part B: Eng. 284 (2024) 111731. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111731

  30. [30]

      Z. Zeng, Y. Yan, J. Chen, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2018) 1806500.

  31. [31]

      P. Sun, Z. Xing, Z. Li, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 458 (2023) 141399. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141399

  32. [32]

      L. Zhao, P. Zhang, L. Li, et al., Chemosphere 361 (2024) 142547. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142547

  33. [33]

      J. Yang, Q. Zhu, Z. Xie, et al., J. Alloy. Compd. 887 (2021) 161411. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161411

  34. [34]

      Q. Xue, H. Zhang, M. Zhu, et al., Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1604847. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604847

  35. [35]

      A. Wang, Y. Wen, H. Zhu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 496 (2024) 154264. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.154264

  36. [36]

      Q. Li, X. Cui, X. Liu, et al., J. Alloy. Compd. 1011 (2025) 178399. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.178399

  37. [37]

      B. Chang, Y. Guo, H. Liu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 3134-3145. doi: 10.1039/d1ta09941h

  38. [38]

      T. Cheng, Z. Xing, N. Zhang, et al., Chemosphere 364 (2024) 143255. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143255

  39. [39]

      Z. Yao, H. Sun, S. Xiao, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 560 (2020) 150037.

  40. [40]

      L. Lu, N. Liang, H. Sun, et al., J. Materiomics 8 (2022) 47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.05.007

  41. [41]

      J. Wu, W. Chang, Y. Chang, et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (2016) 3718-3725. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505785

  42. [42]

      T. Wang, N. Song, S. Yao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 495 (2024) 153379. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.153379

  43. [43]

      S. Wu, H. Hu, Y. Lin, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 382 (2020) 122842. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122842

  44. [44]

      M. Shkir, S.H. Aldirham, S. AlFaify, et al., Chemosphere 357 (2024) 141934. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141934

  45. [45]

      Z. Guan, X. Li, Y. Wu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 410 (2021) 128283. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128283

  46. [46]

      S. Zhang, Z. Xu, T. Ji, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 353 (2025) 128148. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128148

  47. [47]

      G. Li, B. Gu, Y. Luo, et al., J. Environ. Manage. 353 (2024) 120210. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120210

  48. [48]

      J. Jia, L. Zheng, K. Li, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 429 (2022) 132432. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132432

  49. [49]

      X. Feng, R. Long, C. Liu, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 302 (2022) 122138. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122138

  50. [50]

      H. Yang, F. Wang, H. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 4438-4444. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13492

  51. [51]

      D. Liu, B. Sun, S. Bai, et al., Chin. J. Catal. 50 (2023) 273-283. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64462-6

  52. [52]

      J. Tang, R. Guo, W. Zhou, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 237 (2018) 802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.042

  53. [53]

      H. Li, B. Sun, T. Gao, et al., Chin. J. Catal. 43 (2022) 461-471. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63915-3

• 

  Figure 1  Synthesis process diagram of Ti₃C₂ MXene quantum dots/MoS₂ composites.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) XRD patterns of TDM composites. FESEM images of (b) TDM0 and (c) TDM2 samples. (d) HRTEM image and (e, f) element mappings of TDM2 specimen.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) AFM morphology, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) phase image of TDM2. (d) XPS survey spectra and high resolution XPS spectra of (e) Mo 3d, (f) S 2p of TDM0 and TDM2. (g) Stead-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra, (h) transient photocurrent response (with ultrasonic vibration), and (i) electrochemical impendence spectra (with ultrasonic vibration) of as-prepared samples.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Degradation curves and corresponding reaction rate constant of TDM0 (MoS2), TDM1, TDM2, TDM3, and TDM4 samples (TC-HCl, 20 mg/L) under different conditions of (a, d) photocatalysis, (b, e) piezocatalysis, and (c, f) piezo-photocatalysis. (g) Comparison of TC-HCl degradation rate constants in the reported reference.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  CO yield of (a) photocatalysis, (b) piezocatalysis, and (c) piezo-photocatalysis of as-prepared samples. (d) The isotope-labelled ¹³CO₂ experiment. (e) Photoredox activity of TDM0 and TDM2 under various reaction conditions. (f) The piezo-photocatalytic CO yields after 5 h reaction in 5 consequtive runs of TDM2.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Schematic illustration of the charge migration mechanism of TDM2 composite in the piezo-photocatalytic reaction.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•