English

• Fabricating porous frameworks with precisely controlled pore sizes is a long-standing research hotspot but still remains a formidable challenge, especially for the fabrication of frameworks with large pore sizes [1-4]. One possible approach to this challenge is utilizing long rigid macromolecules or polymers with controllable lengths as links. However, the interpenetration of these long links may result in amorphous materials with smaller and uncontrollable pore structures. Moreover, most polymer links have inefficient stiffness to support entire frameworks, potentially leading to collapsed or poorly ordered structures [5-8]. Therefore, rigid polymer links that can effectively support an entire framework, reduce structural defects, and enhance uniformity are urgently needed. Among the artificial polymers, polyisocyanide carrying substituent on every backbone atom and adopt a rodlike helical structure and may have great potential for the fabrication of frameworks [9-13]. Previously, we developed a family of alkyne-Pd(Ⅱ) catalysts enable the precise synthesie of helical polyisocyanides with precisely controlled molecular weight and extremely narrow distribution. Using the precisely synthesized polyisocyanides as links can fabricate frameworks with predesignable pore structures. The long rodlike polyisocyanides may lead to ordered frameworks with large pore size, which have great promise in enzyme capsulation.

  Enzymes are excellent biocatalysts that show significant potential in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries due to their high activity and excellent selectivity [14-17]. However, owing to their inherent fragility, it is difficult for natural enzymes to maintain their favorable conformation and high catalytic activity in complex operable conditions and harsh environments [18-20]. Consequently, the direct utilization of enzymes in practical applications is often hampered by low activity, poor stability, hard recyclability, and limited operating conditions. One effective solution to overcome these drawbacks is the immobilization of natural enzymes onto solid supports [21-23]. In this context, porous frameworks with uniform channels are promising materials for enzyme immobilization. In addition to facilitating substrate transport and enrichment, porous frameworks also provide immobilized enzymes with selective permeability and structural stability [24,25]. The encapsulation of enzymes into porous materials involves two strategies: one is biomineralizing enzymes by self-assembly with porous material precursors, which overcomes the intrinsic pore size limitations of porous materials. However, the harsh medium required to crystallize the porous material is not very compatible with fragile enzymes [26-28]. A second strategy involves the infiltration of enzymes into pre-synthesized nanoscale porous materials, which enhances the mass transfer and stability of the enzymes. However, this strategy is generally limited to enzymes with sizes smaller than the internal pore aperture of the porous material, and larger enzymes are not easily encapsulated [29-32]. Furthermore, the pore size of a framework directly determines how it interacts with molecules, which influences its functionality and applications [33,34]. Compared to two-dimensional (2D) frameworks, three-dimensional (3D) frameworks provide more space and channels for enzyme encapsulation, leading to enhanced loading capacity and inhibited deactivation [32,35]. Therefore, the precise synthesis of 3D porous frameworks with controllable and large pore sizes to immobilize enzymes is essential.

  Among the reported frameworks, supramolecular organic frameworks (SOFs) are composed of organic molecules linked via intermolecular supramolecular interactions. Due to the dynamic character of the supramolecular interactions, self-correction of the assemblies occurs and results in SOFs with highly ordered structures [36-38]. Hydrogen bonding is a popular supramolecular interaction featuring large bonding constants, high directionality, and good reversibility [39-42]. Therefore, constructing supramolecular organic polymer frameworks (SPFs) using rigid polyisocyanide with tunable length as links via hydrogen bonding connections may generate porous frameworks with bespoke shapes, sizes, and functionalities [25,43-45]. These porous frameworks could be used as "exoskeletons" to encapsulate fragile enzymes, generating a new type of metal-free crystalline biocomposite featuring superior catalytic activity and operational stability compared to free enzymes. Additionally, porous frameworks could be used to encapsulate multiple enzymes. This could enable enzymatic cascade reactions, which would eliminate the tedious isolation and purification of reaction intermediates.

  Among the various supramolecular interactions, the hydrogen bonding interactiong between the 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (Upy) features high association constant. These attributes enable Upy to be widely used in supramolecular self-assembly and framework construction [46,47]. In this work, we designed and synthesized a series of 3D SPFs with tunable pore sizes. The frameworks with the pore size matchable to enzymes was applied as enzyme exoskeletons. First, tetrahedral four-arm star polyisocyanides with precisely controlled M_n and low M_w/M_n were prepared via the four-functional Pd(Ⅱ)-catalyzed living polymerization of isocyanide (Scheme 1). Then, a Upy unit was installed onto each chain end of the star polyisocyanide through post-polymerization functionalization via the terminal Pd(Ⅱ)-catalyzed Songashira cross coupling reaction. Leverage the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the terminal Upy units, these tetrahedral star polyisocyanides self-assembly into ordered SPF_ms with uniformly porous networks. Remarkably, the pore size of these SPFs is proportional to the degree of polymerization (DP) of the polyisocyanide, enabling precise control of the pore aperture. Therefore, a family of SPFs with pore sizes of ca. 5.06, 7.27, 8.12, and 9.72 nm was precisely fabricated using four-arm polyisocyanides with DP of 10 (SPF₁₀), 20 (SPF₂₀), 30 (SPF₃₀), and 40 (SPF₄₀), respectively. The ordered SPFs possess uniform and tunable porosity, facilitating their usage as enzyme exoskeletons. The lipase (TL), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and glucose oxidase (GOx) were respectively encapsulated into SPF₁₀, SPF₂₀, and SPF₃₀ with high loading capacities of 26, 21, and 24 wt%. All the encapsulated enzymes display superior catalytic activity and operational stability compared to the corresponding free enzymes. Furthermore, these 3D SPFs faciliate the encapsulation of more than one enzymes, and realized a dual enzyme-catalyzed cascade reaction, which minimize the diffusion limitation of intermediates and improve the catalytic activity of the cascade reaction.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Schematic diagram of enzyme immobilization in SPF_ms.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As shown in Fig. 1, tetrahedral four-arm alkyne–Pd(Ⅱ) catalysts (FA-Pd(Ⅱ)) were prepared from tetrakis(4-ethynylphenyl)methane (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). The living polymerization of isocyanide (1) initiated by FA-Pd(Ⅱ) with 1-to-Pd(Ⅱ) ratios fixed of 10, 20, 30 and 40 resulted in a series of four-arm polyisocyanides denoted FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ) (where m is theoretical DP, m = 10, 20, 30, and 40). These polyisocyanides had desired M_ns and low M_w/M_ns values, and they featured Pd(Ⅱ) terminals (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). Fig. 2a illustrates that these polymers exhibited single modal elution traces in size exclusion chromatography (SEC). A linear correlation between the M_n of the synthesized polymers and their 1-to-Pd(Ⅱ) catalyst ratio was observed. Additionally, the isolated FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ) displayed low dispersity, with M_w/M_n values of < 1.20 (Fig. 2b). To install Upy unit onto the chain-ends of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ), the terminal Pd(Ⅱ) complex was activated by coordinating with a bidentate phosphine ligand (Wei-phos) and then catalyzed Sonogashira cross coupling reaction with Upy, followed the procedure reported by us previously [25]. The SEC analyses of the resulting FA-poly-1_m-Upy bearing Upy terminals also showed single modal elution traces and maintained low dispersity (M_w/M_n < 1.20) (Fig. S3 and Table S1 in Supporting information). The structures of the isolated FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ) and FA-poly-1_m-Upy were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR). As displayed in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), three sharp resonances at downfield 10.25 (-NHCO-), 11.90 (-CONH-), and 13.12 (-NCNHC-) ppm were clearly observed, which can be ascribed to the Upy units in CDCl₃. The ³¹P NMR spectrum of FA-poly-1₂₀-Pd(Ⅱ) showed a clear resonance at 13.1 ppm, which was attributed to the Pd-coordinated PEt₃. whereas no ³¹P signal could be detected of FA-poly-1₂₀-Upy, suggesting that a Upy unit was installed on each polyisocyanide terminal (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum of FA-poly-1₂₀-Upy showed vibrations at 2210 and 1630 cm^‒1 attributed to the C≡C bond of FA-poly-1₂₀-Upy and C=N bond of the polyisocyanide backbone, respectively (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that both FA-poly-1₂₀-Upy and FA-poly-1₂₀-Pd(Ⅱ) had good thermal stability, with thermal decomposition temperatures (T_d, 5% weight loss) higher than 300 ℃ (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) profile of FA-poly-1₂₀-Upy showed glass transition (T_g, 98 ℃) and melting (T_m, 228 ℃) temperatures (Fig. S8 in Supporting information) higher than those of the FA-poly-1₂₀-Pd(Ⅱ) precursor (T_g = 95 ℃; T_m = 224 ℃).

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Synthetic route for ordered porous SPF_ms.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) SEC curves of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ)s. (b) Plot of M_n and M_w/M_n of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ)s against the DP of polyisocyanide link. (c) DLS curves of SPF_ms (0.2 mg/mL, CHCl₃). Insets: Tyndell effects of SPF₁₀ (left side) and FA-poly-1₁₀-Pd(Ⅱ) (right side) in CHCl₃ (2.0 mg/mL). (d) Solution-phase synchrotron SAXS profiles of SPF₁₀ in CHCl₃. (e) Plot of d-spacing (SAXS) vs. the DP of polyisocyanide link. (f) Nitrogen sorption isotherms of SPF₁₀ (insets: pore size distribution). (g) Plots of the S_BET and d_{pore, BJH} of SPF_ms vs. the DP of the polyisocyanide backbone. TEM image of SPF₁₀ (h) and SPF₂₀ (i) casted from the CHCl₃ solutions (insets: partial enlarged image).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The isolated FA-poly-1_m-Upy polymers with different DPs were self-assembly into porous SPF_ms (m = DP) in non-polar solvents (CHCl₃) via intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the terminal Upy units. Notably, the CHCl₃ solution of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ) was clear and transparent, lacking of any Tyndall effect, regardless of DPs. In contrast, a pronounced Tyndall effect was observed in the CHCl₃ solutions of all the synthesized FA-poly-1_m-Upy bearing Upy unit on the terminals, suggesting they were self-assembled into porous SPF_m, confirming the formation of the expected frameworks (Fig. 2c). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis indicated that FA-poly-1₁₀-Pd(Ⅱ) had a hydrodynamic diameter of 7.8 nm in CHCl₃, suggesting its molecular dissolution (Fig. S9 in Supporting information). Meanwhile, the hydrodynamic diameters of SPF₁₀, SPF₂₀, SPF₃₀, and SPF₄₀ were 100.5, 139.2, 174.5, and 277.2 nm, respectively, even when diluted to 0.1 mg/mL (Fig. 2c and Fig. S10 in Supporting information). This result indicated the FA-poly-1_m-Upy with different molecular weights were self-assembly into large-sized frameworks. The ordering of the porous SPF_ms was further verified by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis. The SAXS curve of the CHCl₃ solution of SPF₁₀ showed a clear peak at q ≈ 1.12 nm⁻¹, which corresponded to a simulated pore aperture of 5.60 nm (Fig. 2d). Similarly, the SAXS curves of SPF₂₀, SPF₃₀, and SPF₄₀, showed peaks at q ≈ 0.86, 0.74, and 0.64 nm⁻¹, respectively (Fig. S11 in Supporting information), which corresponded to pore apertures of 7.30, 8.40, and 9.80 nm. These results further confirmed the formation of frameworks with different pore apertures. Interestingly, the SAXS analyses suggested that the aperture size of the SPF_ms was linearly correlated to the DP of the polyisocyanide links (Fig. 2e), due to the rigid rodlike backbone of helical polyisocydnie. The linear correlation between the pore-aperture with the DP of polyisocyanide backbone supports high controllability of pore size. That means control over the DP of polyisocyanide via the living polymerization technique could readily tune the pore size of the SPF_ms. Based on the slop of the plot in Fig. 2e, it can be concluded that the every one increment in the DP of polyisocyanide backbone, the pore size increases by ca. 0.15 nm.

  The porosities of the generated frameworks were further investigated by nitrogen sorption isotherm measurements. All the SPF_ms exhibited typical type Ⅳ isotherms, indicating the formation of mesoporous frameworks. As summarized in Table S2 (Supporting information), the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area (S_BET) of SPF₁₀ was 98.34 m²/g, and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution was centered at ca. 5.06 nm (Fig. 2f). The pore volume (V_pore) of SPF₁₀ was calculated to be 0.44 g/mL. As the DP of the polyisocyanide arms increased, the S_BET values of SPF₂₀, SPF₃₀, and SPF₄₀ decreased to 87.26, 53.28, and 32.15 m²/g, respectively, while their pore apertures increased to 7.27, 8.12, and 9.72 nm, respectively. The pore apertures obtained from nitrogen sorption isotherm measurements was linearly correlated to the DP of the polyisocyanide arms (Fig. 2g and Table S2), agreeing well with the SAXS analyses. In addition, the BJH pore volumes (V_pore) of SPF₂₀, SPF₃₀, and SPF₄₀ were 0.30, 0.21, and 0.18 cm³/g, respectively (Fig. S12 and Table S2 in Supporting information). S_BET and V_pore were also correlated to the DP of the polyisocyanide links. As plotted in Fig. 2g, the S_BET values linearly decreased with increasing DP, while the pore aperture and V_pore linearly increased with increasing DP (Fig. S13 and Table S2 in Supporting information). Notably, owing to the dense hydrophobic pendants of the polyisocyanide links, the SPFs maintained their porous structures after being treated with water, as confirmed by nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis (Fig. S14 in Supporting information). This was expected to facilitate the encapsulation of enzymes in water. As displayed in Fig. 2h, the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of SPF₁₀ clearly shows clear lattice fringe with the spacing of 5.32 nm and it is consistent with this estimated through the SAXS and BET analyses. Similarly, SPF₂₀, SPF₃₀ and SPF₄₀ are also analyzed by TEM, but it is difficult to detect their lattice fringes due to the large pore size (Fig. 2i and Fig. S15 in Supporting information). Therefore, the pore structures were visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SPF_ms with different pore sizes exhibited different morphologies [48]. For instance, SPF₁₀ and SPF₂₀, synthesized with relatively short polyisocyanide blocks, exhibited rough surfaces decorated with pores (Figs. 3a and b). As the length of the polyisocyanide increased, SPF₃₀ and SPF₄₀ showed fleshy fluffy surfaces (Figs. 3c and d). These observations suggest that the morphology of these porous polymers can be controlled by adjusting the length of the polyisocyanide links. This result can be attributed to the formation of pores by intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the terminal Upy units, which means that the pore aperture size directly depends on the length of the rigid polyisocyanide links.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  SEM images of SPF₁₀ (a) (insets: partial enlarged image), SPF₂₀ (b), SPF₃₀ (c) and SPF₄₀ (d) casted from the CHCl₃ solutions.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The porous SPF_ms with controllable pore sizes show great promise for enzyme encapsulation. Therefore, to investigate their enzyme encapsulation capability, the encapsulation of lipase from Thermophila lanuginosa (TL, size: 3.5 × 4.5 × 5.0 nm³) was first explored. SPF_ms with different sizes were immersed into a phosphate-buffered saline solution containing TL, and the UV–vis absorbance of the supernatant was measured. Based on the change in the characteristic absorbance at 280 nm, approximately 26, 19, and 12 wt% of the TL was encapsulated into SPF₁₀, SPF₂₀, and SPF₃₀, respectively. In contrast, only a smaller amount of TL (less than ca. 6 wt%) was encapsulated in the larger pores of SPF₄₀, which was because the pore size of this sample was too large to encapsulate TL (Table S3 in Supporting information). SPF₁₀ showed the highest encapsulation capacity because its pore size matched the size of TL (Figs. 4a and b). To confirm the encapsulation of TL in the pores of SPF_ms, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used to remove the physically adsorbed enzymes from the surface of the SPF_ms [27]. It was revealed that only 2%–10% of the TL removed from the solution was physically adsorbed as free enzymes on the SPF surface, meaning that > 90% of the enzymes were encapsulated into the SPF_ms (Fig. S16 in Supporting information). The nitrogen sorption isotherms of the TL-encapsulated SPF_ms (TL@SPF_ms) showed a reduction in BET surface area (Fig. S17 in Supporting information). The FT-IR spectrum of TL@SPF₁₀ displayed characteristic adsorption peaks at 3296, 2871, and 1654 cm⁻¹ that were ascribed to TL (Fig. S18 in Supporting information). Furthermore, the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of TL@SPF₁₀ was almost the same to that of the free TL (Fig. S19 in Supporting information), indicating that the encapsulated TL maintained its pristine conformation. To assess the catalytic performance of TL@SPF_ms, the hydrolysis reaction of p-nitrophenyl β-D-glucopyranoside (p-NPGlc) catalyzed by TL and TL@SPF₁₀ was studied in phosphate-buffered saline. The production of p-nitrophenol (p-NP) was detected by measuring the UV–vis absorbance at a wavelength of 405 nm to determine the activity of TL and TL@SPF₁₀. Both free TL and encapsulated TL@SPF₁₀ catalyzed the hydrolysis of p-NPGlc and produced targeted p-NP. However, the catalytic activity of TL@SPF₁₀ was 1.2 times higher than that of the free TL due to the confinement effect of the encapsulated enzymes in TL@SPF₁₀ (Figs. 4c and d, and Table S4 in Supporting information). The porosity of the SPF₁₀ was beneficial for the enrichment of p-NPGlc and strengthening the interaction between the encapsulated TL and p-NPGlc, leading to enhanced catalytic activity. Note that pure SPF₁₀ did not show any catalytic activity, confirming that the catalytic of the TL@SPF₁₀ was entirely derived from the encapsulated TL. Additionally, the catalytic activities of TL@SPF₂₀, TL@SPF₃₀, and TL@SPF₄₀ were also investigated. TL@SPF₂₀ and TL@SPF₃₀ showed catalytic activities that were 1.12 times and 1.05 times higher than that of free TL, respectively. The catalytic activity of TL@SPF₄₀ was comparable to that of free TL. These results further demonstrated that SPFs with pore sizes matching the size of TL were favorable for improving catalytic activity. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of TL@SPF₁₀ toward substrates with different sizes (p-nitrophenyl decanoate (p-NPD) and p-nitrophenyl palmitate (p-NPP)) was also investigated. When free TL was used as a catalyst, the hydrolysis of p-NPD, which has shorter alkyl chains, proceeded more rapidly than that of p-NPP. The p-NPD/p-NPP reaction ratio of this catalyst was 1.8. Surprisingly, when TL@SPF₁₀ was used as the catalyst, the hydrolysis of p-NPP, which has longer alkyl chains, was much more rapid than that of p-NPD, and the p-NPP/p-NPD reaction rate ratio was 1.4 (Fig. 4e). This was because the longer alkyl chains of p-NPP meant that this reactant was retained in the pores of SPF₁₀ for a longer period, increasing the chance of contact with the enzyme. TL@SPF₁₀ also showed high stability, retaining 56% of its catalytic activity after 30 days of storage. In contrast, the free TL only maintained 12% of its catalytic activity (Fig. 4f). Furthermore, the TL@SPF_ms were easily recovered from the reaction mixture by centrifugation for reuse in the hydrolysis process. Based on the product yield, the catalytic activity remained above 75% even after 5 cycles. Under the same conditions, the catalytic activity of free TL was completely lost after the first recycle (Fig. 4g).

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  (a) Schematic diagram for encapsulating enzyme into SPF_ms for catalysis. (b) Encapsulations of TL into SPF_ms with different apertures. (c) The catalytic activities of pNPGlc catalyzed by TL and TL@SPF_ms. (d) Lineweaver−Burk plot of n-NPGlc concentrations vs. reaction velocity for TL and TL@SPF₁₀. (e) The relative hydrolysis activity of TL and TL@SPF_ms towards p-NPD and p-NPP. (f) Relative stability of TL and TL@SPF₁₀ in storage at room temperature. (g) The catalytic cycles of pNPGlc catalyzed by TL and TL@SPF_ms.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To demonstrate that SPFs with controllable pore size could serve as versatile nanoplatforms for enzyme encapsulation, the encapsulation of glucose oxidase (GOx, 6.0 × 5.2 × 7.7 nm³) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP, 4.0 × 4.4 × 6.8 nm³) into the SPF_ms was attempted using the same procedure described above. Given the different sizes of HRP and GOx, different encapsulation efficiencies were observed. HRP was most effectively encapsulated within SPF₂₀ (21 wt%), followed by SPF₃₀ (18 wt%), SPF₄₀ (9 wt%), and SPF₁₀ (6 wt%) (Table S3). In contrast, GOx was most effectively encapsulated within SPF₃₀ (24 wt%), followed by SPF₄₀ (16 wt%), SPF₂₀ (10 wt%), and SPF₁₀ (8 wt%) (Table S3). These results further confirm the importance of matchable pore size for the effective immobilization of biomacromolecules (Table S2). The HRP-encapsulated SPF_ms (HRP@SPF_ms) and GOx-encapsulated SPF_ms (GOx@SPF_ms) were further characterized by N₂ adsorption, FT-IR measurements, and CD spectroscopy (Figs. S20-S22 in Supporting information), which confirmed that the enzymes were encapsulated into the pores and maintained their pristine conformations. Next, the catalytic activities of the HRP@SPF₂₀, free HRP, GOx@SPF₃₀, and free GOx were investigated. HRP@SPF₂₀ showed catalytic activity that was 1.2 times higher than that of free HRP. Similarly, the catalytic activity of GOx@SPF₃₀ was 1.3 times higher than that of free GOx. These results indicate that the SPFs with matched pore sizes are favorable for biocatalysis. Furthermore, large-sized frameworks could also be applied for the encapsulation of dual enzymes to perform cascade reactions. As shown in Fig. 5a, two enzymes (GOx and HRP) were encapsulated into SPF₃₀. FT-IR and N₂ adsorption analyses indicated that GOx and HRP were both encapsulated into SPF₃₀ (15 wt% GOx and 13 wt% HRP), forming GOx & HRP-encapsulated SPF₃₀ (GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀) (Figs. S23 and S24 in Supporting information). When GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ used as a dual-enzyme catalyst, GOx in GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ specifically catalyzes the conversion of β-D-glucose to gluconic acid and H₂O₂ in the presence of O₂ [49]. The catalytic reaction involves a reduction step and an oxidation step (Figs. 5a and b). The reduction step is as follows: β-D-glucose is catalytically oxidized by GOx in the presence of one molecule of oxygen to D-glucono-δ-lactone, which is then non-enzymatically hydrolyzed with one molecule of water to gluconic acid, and the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor on the GOx is reduced to FADH₂. In the oxidation step, the oxygen molecules oxidize the FADH₂ to FAD and H₂O₂ is produced. Next, HRP in GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ oxidizes the substrate (diammonium 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS)) in conjunction with H₂O₂, converting it to the oxidized state (ABTS^+•), while producing H₂O. Compared with a homogeneous mixture of free enzymes in solution, GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ showed a 1.5-fold enhancement in catalytic activity for the cascade reactions (Fig. 5c). This improvement was attributed to the reduced distance between GOx and HRP after encapsulation, which minimized the diffusion limitations of intermediates. The encapsulated GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ remained highly active after 30 days of storage (65% activity retention), while the free GOx & HRP showed poor activity (only 16% activity retention) (Fig. 5d). Moreover, the encapsulated GOx & HRP@SPF₃₀ was easily recovered by centrifugation, retaining > 85% of its activity after 5 cycles (Fig. 5e). These findings further emphasize the importance of matchable aperture encapsulation strategies in cascade reactions.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  (a) Mechanism diagram of the catalytic activity for the cascade reactions. (b) Encapsulation of HRP and GOx into the SPF_ms for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction. (c) Relative activity of HRP, GOx, HRP & GOx, and encapsulated HRP@SPF₂₀, GOx@SPF₃₀, and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀. (d) Relative stability of HRP & GOx and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀ after storage for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction. (e) Catalytic cycles of HRP@GOx and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀ for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, a series of tetrahedral four-arm polyisocyanides with controlled M_n and low M_w/M_n was successfully synthesized. Though the terminal the Pd(Ⅱ)-catalyzed Sonogashira cross coupling reaction, Upy was installed onto the chain ends of the four-arm polyisoycnaides. Driven by intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the terminal Upy, well-ordered porous frameworks were successfully obtained (SPFs). SAXS, SEM, and nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis demonstrated that the prepared SPFs possess ordered crystalline frameworks. The pore size of the SPFs is directly rely on the DP of the polyisocyanide arms. Therefore, by adjusting the DP, it is readily to precisely control the pore size of the SPFs, enabling the preparation of porous frameworks with highly tunable pore sizes. By designing frameworks with pore sizes matching the dimensions of encapsulated enzymes, the presence of these SPF_ms as exoskeletons significantly enhances the catalytic activity and stability of the enzymes. Furthermore, encapsulating two enzymes within an SPF_m with a large pore size enables dual-enzyme cascade reactions. This study offers a method for precisely constructing porous frameworks with highly tunable pore-size and provides a novel exoskeleton material for the encapsulation of enzymes in practical applications.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Runtan Gao: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Yang Zong: Data curation. Tingting Li: Data curation. Na Liu: Writing – review & editing. Zongquan Wu: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition.

  Acknowledgments

  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 92256201, 52273006, 22071041, 92356302, and 21971052) and Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20240101181JC) are gratefully appreciated for financial the supports. This work was also supported by the User Experiment Assist System of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111582.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     J. Wei, Z. Sun, W. Luo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 1706–1713. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11411

  2. [2]

     J. Han, J. Feng, J. Kang, et al., Science 383 (2024) 1014–1019. doi: 10.1126/science.adk8680

  3. [3]

     J. Dong, Y. Liu, Y. Cui, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 194–206. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00604

  4. [4]

     X. Zhao, P. Pachfule, S. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 6623–6630. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b01226

  5. [5]

     E. Altay, D. Nykypanchuk, J. Rzayev, ACS Nano 11 (2017) 8207–8214. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03214

  6. [6]

     X. Cao, Y. Jin, H. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109201. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109201

  7. [7]

     C. Yao, J. Tian, H. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 893–899. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.01.005

  8. [8]

     S.E. Neumann, J. Kwon, C. Gropp, et al., Science 383 (2024) 1337–1343. doi: 10.1126/science.adf2573

  9. [9]

     P.H.J. Kouwer, P. de Almeida, O. ven den Boomen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 281–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.11.002

  10. [10]

      N. Liu, L. Zhou, Z.Q. Wu, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 3953–3967. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00489

  11. [11]

      E. Yashima, K. Maeda, H. Iida, Y. Furusho, K. Nagai, Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 6102–6211. doi: 10.1021/cr900162q

  12. [12]

      C. Du, X. Zhu, C. Yang, M. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202113979. doi: 10.1002/anie.202113979

  13. [13]

      L. Zhou, K. He, S.M. Kang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202310105. doi: 10.1002/anie.202310105

  14. [14]

      H. He, W. Tan, J. Guo, et al., Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 9994–10078. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00306

  15. [15]

      S. Chakrabarty, E.O. Romero, J.B. Pyser, J.A. Yazarians, A.R.H. Narayan, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 1374–1384. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00810

  16. [16]

      S. Tang, A.T. Beattie, L. Kafkova, et al., Nature 602 (2022) 701–707. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04414-9

  17. [17]

      J. Shi, Y. Wu, S. Zhang, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 4295–4313. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00914c

  18. [18]

      S. Qiao, H. Jin, A. Zuo, Y. Chen, Acc. Chem. Res. 57 (2024) 93–105. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00565

  19. [19]

      W. Xu, Y. Wu, W. Gu, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 53 (2024) 137–162. doi: 10.1039/D3CS00767G

  20. [20]

      K.Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Y.C. Hsu, et al., Zhou, Chem. Rev. 123 (2023) 5347–5420. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00879

  21. [21]

      J. Qiao, L. Liu, J. Shen, L. Qi, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3195–3198. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.021

  22. [22]

      M. Wang, S. Fa, G. Zhang, J. Yu, Q. Zhang, Small 19 (2023) 2304957. doi: 10.1002/smll.202304957

  23. [23]

      J. Zhou, Z. Su, M. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 399 (2020) 125767. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125767

  24. [24]

      S.D. Diwakara, W.S.Y. Ong, Y.H. Wijesundara, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 2468–2473. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12020

  25. [25]

      R.T. Gao, S.Y. Li, Y. Zong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202410010. doi: 10.1002/anie.202410010

  26. [26]

      Y. Zhang, C. Xing, Z. Mu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 13469–13475. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c04183

  27. [27]

      R. Gao, X. Kou, L. Tong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202319876. doi: 10.1002/anie.202319876

  28. [28]

      W. Liang, F. Carraro, M.B. Solomon, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 14298–14305. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06589

  29. [29]

      C. Xing, P. Mei, Z. Mu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202201378. doi: 10.1002/anie.202201378

  30. [30]

      A. Kumar Mahato, S. Pal, K. Dey, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 12793–12801. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c03562

  31. [31]

      Q. Sun, C.W. Fu, B. Aguila, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 984–992. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10642

  32. [32]

      H. Liu, Y. Zhou, J. Guo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 23227–23237. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c07904

  33. [33]

      S. Paul, M. Gupta, K. Dey, et al., Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 6643–6653. doi: 10.1039/d3sc01367g

  34. [34]

      J.L. Lin, Z.K. Wang, Z.Y. Xu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 3577–3582. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13263

  35. [35]

      G. Lin, H. Ding, R. Chen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 8705–8709. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04141

  36. [36]

      E. Elacqua, K.B. Manning, D.S. Lye, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 12240–12250. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06201

  37. [37]

      P. Sun, B. Qin, J.F. Xu, X. Zhang, Prog. Polym. Sci. 124 (2022) 101486. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101486

  38. [38]

      E.R. Draper, D.J. Adams, Nat. Mater. 23 (2024) 13–15. doi: 10.1038/s41563-023-01765-0

  39. [39]

      Y. Liu, L. Wang, L. Zhao, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 53 (2024) 1592–1623. doi: 10.1039/d3cs00705g

  40. [40]

      Y. Zhou, L. Kan, J.F. Eubank, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 6565–6571. doi: 10.1039/c9sc00290a

  41. [41]

      F. Lin, S.B. Yu, Y.Y. Liu, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2200549. doi: 10.1002/adma.202200549

  42. [42]

      Q. Li, J.D. Sun, B. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1988–1992. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.017

  43. [43]

      K. Yang, Q. Li, S. Tian, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 10699–10707. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c00541

  44. [44]

      J. Verjans, R. Hoogenboom, Prog. Polym. Sci. 142 (2023) 101689. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101689

  45. [45]

      A.J.P. Teunissen, T.F.E. Paffen, G. Ercolani, T.F.A. de Greef, E.W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 6852–6860. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03421

  46. [46]

      Z. Zhang, Y. Ye, S. Xiang, B. Chen, Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (2022) 3752–3766. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00686

  47. [47]

      L. Yue, S. Wang, D. Zhou, et al., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 10742. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10742

  48. [48]

      X.H. Xu, Y.X. Li, L. Zhou, N. Liu, Z.Q. Wu, Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 1111–1118. doi: 10.1039/D1SC05361B

  49. [49]

      S.B. Bankar, M.V. Bule, R.S. Singhal, L. Ananthanarayan, Biotechnol. Adv. 27 (2009) 489–501. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.003

• 

  Scheme 1  Schematic diagram of enzyme immobilization in SPF_ms.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  Synthetic route for ordered porous SPF_ms.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) SEC curves of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ)s. (b) Plot of M_n and M_w/M_n of FA-poly-1_m-Pd(Ⅱ)s against the DP of polyisocyanide link. (c) DLS curves of SPF_ms (0.2 mg/mL, CHCl₃). Insets: Tyndell effects of SPF₁₀ (left side) and FA-poly-1₁₀-Pd(Ⅱ) (right side) in CHCl₃ (2.0 mg/mL). (d) Solution-phase synchrotron SAXS profiles of SPF₁₀ in CHCl₃. (e) Plot of d-spacing (SAXS) vs. the DP of polyisocyanide link. (f) Nitrogen sorption isotherms of SPF₁₀ (insets: pore size distribution). (g) Plots of the S_BET and d_{pore, BJH} of SPF_ms vs. the DP of the polyisocyanide backbone. TEM image of SPF₁₀ (h) and SPF₂₀ (i) casted from the CHCl₃ solutions (insets: partial enlarged image).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  SEM images of SPF₁₀ (a) (insets: partial enlarged image), SPF₂₀ (b), SPF₃₀ (c) and SPF₄₀ (d) casted from the CHCl₃ solutions.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  (a) Schematic diagram for encapsulating enzyme into SPF_ms for catalysis. (b) Encapsulations of TL into SPF_ms with different apertures. (c) The catalytic activities of pNPGlc catalyzed by TL and TL@SPF_ms. (d) Lineweaver−Burk plot of n-NPGlc concentrations vs. reaction velocity for TL and TL@SPF₁₀. (e) The relative hydrolysis activity of TL and TL@SPF_ms towards p-NPD and p-NPP. (f) Relative stability of TL and TL@SPF₁₀ in storage at room temperature. (g) The catalytic cycles of pNPGlc catalyzed by TL and TL@SPF_ms.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  (a) Mechanism diagram of the catalytic activity for the cascade reactions. (b) Encapsulation of HRP and GOx into the SPF_ms for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction. (c) Relative activity of HRP, GOx, HRP & GOx, and encapsulated HRP@SPF₂₀, GOx@SPF₃₀, and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀. (d) Relative stability of HRP & GOx and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀ after storage for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction. (e) Catalytic cycles of HRP@GOx and HRP & GOx@SPF₃₀ for catalyzed glucose and ABTS cascade reaction.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•