English

• Rapid consumption of fossil fuels has exposed clear deficiencies in future energy and environmental, thus exploring clean and renewable energy for sustainable development is extremely important [1-5]. Owing to its eco-friendly and reproducible properties, hydrogen is perceived as a promising alternative to traditional fossil fuels [6,7]. Compared to traditional technologies, hydrogen production through electrocatalytic water splitting has become a prospective and effective strategy due to its high energy-conversion efficiency [8,9]. Nevertheless, the sluggish reaction kinetics of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) generally leads to large extra energy consumption [10,11]. To mitigate the reaction energy barriers and accelerate the reaction dynamics, advanced catalysts require to be developed [12,13]. Although precious metal Pt-based material has been shown to be the most efficient catalyst for HER, the exorbitant price and scarcity still restrict its large-scale applications [14,15]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore highly active, cost-effective, and durable noble metal-free HER electrocatalysts to achieve the economic production of hydrogen.

  Recently, transition metal derivatives such as oxides, phosphides, carbides, and chalcogenides have been exploited as potential substitutes due to their excellent electrochemical properties [16-19]. Among various transition metal oxides, molybdenum oxide (MoO₃) has attracted much attention because of its special electronic and unique stable orthorhombic structure, which can enable it to build high-quality electronic interface. Several approaches have been proposed to design the MoO₃-based materials to achieve the enhanced catalytic activity, such as doping elements, vacancy engineering, introducing heterointerfaces, and coupling with conductive carbon supports [20-23]. For example, Xu et al. reported a petal-shaped two-dimensional MoO₃ nanosheets confining Pd nanoparticles (Pd@MoO₃), which only require a low overpotential of 71 mV to maintain the 10 mA/cm² for HER in acidic electrolyte [24]. Hu et al. presented an efficient amorphous NiO nanosheets coupled with ultrafine Ni and MoO₃ nanoparticles (MoO₃/Ni-NiO) with two heterostructures, which only require a low overpotential of 62 mV at 10 mA/cm², outperforming many materials previously reported [25]. Although great efforts have been made, the addition of noble metal and poor conductivity, as well as lack of large number of active sites still restrict its further large-scale usage.

  Size effect plays a significant role in nanomaterials. When the size of nanomaterials reduces, the exposure of surface atoms and specific surface area of materials will show a sharp increase [26]. Superstructures with highly uniform nanoparticles as building blocks have gained intensive attention since the photoelectric characteristics are not only determined by the individual nanoparticle, but also by the optical and electronic communication between these nanoparticles [27]. Therefore, the engineering of multi-component MoO₃-based hybrid superstructures become a promising avenue to improve the electrocatalytic performance due to the possible potential synergetic effect and size-induced new physical and chemical properties. In this regard, polyoxometalates (POMs) is one type of promising functional components to improve the electrocatalytic property because of the unique nanostructure and electrochemical characteristics such as high structure/thermal stability, proton and electron transfer/storage abilities, as well as the instability of its lattice oxygen [28-30]. A large number of POMs have been employed to construct heterostructure hybrid catalysts for HER. For example, Yang et al. reported an effective heterostructure of POM nanoplates and zinc iron oxide (P₂Mo₁₈-ZnFe₂O₄), which exhibit excellent HER performance with the low overpotentials of 268 and 356 mV to achieve 20 and 50 mA/cm² [31]. Wei et al. using POMs anchored zinc cobalt sulfide nanowire on Ni-foam (PW₁₂@ZnCoS/NF) for HER, remarkable activity was achieved at a low overpotential of 170 and 330 mV, giving the 20 and 50 mA/cm² [32].

  Thought-provoking, if we combine MoO₃ with POMs to construct a superstructure hybrid nanomaterial, the unexpected catalytic performance may bring about. Concerned about all this, two hybrid nanobelt superstructures (MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs) were synthesized using a simple hydrothermal method via introducing two type of POM clusters into MoO₃ system during the nucleation stage. Detailed analyses reveal that the incorporated POMs can generate abundant oxygen vacancies and achieve higher electronic mobility. Meanwhile, the incorporation of POMs can provide larger specific surface area, expose more active sites, and modulate the surface electronic structure, thus enhancing the HER performance. Thanks to the induced physical/chemical properties and synergistic effect among various components, MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs deliver the excellent HER behavior, exhibiting the overpotentials of 108 and 183 mV at 10 mA/cm², with the Tafel slopes of 67.6 and 91.6 mV/dec in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄ electrolyte. Their overpotentials are significantly lower than that of corresponding MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (352 mV) and MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀ (380 mV), and about 8.3 and 4.9 times lower than that of MoO₃.

  The synthesis process of the MoO₃-POM HNSs is illustrated in Fig. 1a, in which two types of POM clusters were introduced to the MoO₃ matrix at the nucleation stage. The morphology and structure of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The SEM images (Fig. 1b and Fig. S1 in Supporting information) show that although the employed tungsten-based POM clusters are different, the same morphologies of the products can be observed. The TEM images indicate that plenty of well-distributed 1D thin nanobelts with the thickness about 10 nm were formed (Figs. 1c and d). And we found that the structure of such hybrid nanobelts were highly ordered. The interplanar spacing was measured to be 0.39 nm, which was assigned to the (011) planes of MoO₃ (Fig. 1e) [33]. Meanwhile, it proved that many monodisperse POM particles marked with red circles were incorporated into MoO₃ in an orderly fashion and created abundant defects. The elemental mappings (Fig. 1f) illustrate the uniform distribution of Mo, O, W, and P throughout the HNSs. The Mo, O, W, P, and Si elemental content are confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and summarized in Table S1 (Supporting information).

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) Synthesis process schematic of MoO₃-POM HNSs. (b) SEM image, (c) TEM and (d, e) HRTEM images of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. (f) Elemental mappings of Mo, O, P, and W in MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Fig. 2a shows the XRD pattern of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs, which is in accordance with the MoO₃ phase (PDF#98–0314). The obvious diffraction peaks located at 23.3°, 25.7°, 27.3°, 46.2° and56.2° are assigned to the (110), (040), (021), (210), and (231) crystal planes. While no characteristic peaks related to POM are present in the composite, which may be attributed to the low content and formation of dispersive POM clusters, rather than aggregated large crystals [34,35]. Such similar result can also be observed for MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy presented in Fig. S5 (Supporting information) offers extremely powerful evidence for the formation of hybrids since both the characteristic peaks of MoO₃ and POM present in the MoO₃-POM HNSs. The TGA data (Fig. S6 in Supporting information) demonstrates that the MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs can keep stable when temperature is lower than 600 ℃ and the estimated PW₁₂O₄₀ content in the composite is approximately 50.6 wt% [36]. The elemental composition and valence states of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃ are analyzed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full XPS spectra demonstrate the existence of Mo and O elements in MoO₃, and Mo, O, W elements for MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The high-resolution XPS spectra of Mo 3d demonstrate that both Mo⁵⁺ and Mo⁶⁺ species can be detected from MoO₃ (Fig. 2b), two green-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 232.9 eV and 236.1 eV are derived from Mo 3d_5/2 and Mo 3d_3/2 of Mo⁵⁺, and the other two purple-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 234.3 eV and 237.4 eV originate from Mo 3d_5/2 and Mo 3d_3/2 of Mo⁶⁺, which demonstrates the generation of MoO₃ phase. Compared to MoO₃, the fitted peaks associated with Mo⁵⁺ in MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs disappear, and the position of the Mo⁶⁺ species is negatively shifted by 0.8 eV [37]. The O 1s spectra is also provided as Fig. 2c. The binding energies at 530.0 eV and 531.3 eV in MoO₃ are assigned to Mo-O and oxygen vacancy, respectively [38]. The position of the Mo-O in MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs is also negatively shifted by 0.8 eV. The intrinsic charge differences can be resultant from the electron interactions between different species, i.e. the electron transfer from POM to MoO₃ [39]. In the W 4f spectrum (Fig. 2d), the orange- and purple-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 36.2 eV and 38.4 eV are attributed to the W 4f_7/2 and W 4f_5/2 of W⁶⁺, respectively, confirming the existence of POM in the composite [40]. Moreover, the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of MoO₃ and MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs were carried out. As demonstrated in Fig. 2e, all the samples exhibited apparent characteristic signal at g = 2.003, and the corresponding signals are significantly enhanced after forming MoO₃-POM hybrid superstructures, which corroborated the introduction of oxygen vacancies into the MoO₃ by introducing the POM into MoO₃ system and is consistent with the TEM result [41]. We further synthesized two comparative samples (MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ and MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀) by adding corresponding POM into the pre-synthesized MoO₃ precursor system under the same experimental conditions (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). It is observed that the subsequent introduction of POM into the reaction system only led to the formation of aggregated bulks (Fig. S9 in Supporting information), which demonstrated that the formation of MoO₃-POM HNSs can only occur during the nucleation process of MoO₃. Immediately afterwards, N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms were performed to measure the structural properties of prepared catalysts. As depicted in Fig. 2f, both prepared samples exhibited type Ⅳ isotherms, proving the mesoporous properties [42]. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs is 19.8 m²/g, which is significantly higher than MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (6.9 m²/g) and MoO₃ (3.4 m²/g). Such larger surface area can offer more catalytic active sites for electrocatalytic reactions and facilitate the contact between the catalyst and electrolyte. Surface wettability of the catalyst has a considerable influence on HER performance. The droplet contacts angle (CA) tests (Fig. S10 in Supporting information) demonstrate that MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs show a smaller CA of 9.76° than MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (28.9°) and MoO₃ (34.04°), proving its super-hydrophilic nature [43]. To better elaborate the electrochemical performance, the Mott-Schottky curves were measured. Fig. S11 (Supporting information) shows that slopes of Mott-Schottky curves are positive, proving the electrons are main carriers. The conduction band of MoO₃-POM HNSs are more negative than MoO₃, which is beneficial to the electron transport during the electrochemical reaction [44].

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) XRD patterns of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. (b) Mo 3d, (c) O 1s, and (d) W 4f XPS spectrum of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃. (e) The EPR spectrum and (f) N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms of different catalysts.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To reveal the distinctive role of superstructures in catalytic reactions, the HER performance of the as-synthesized samples was assessed by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in a freshly obtained 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄ aqueous solution. Fig. 3a shows the LSV curves of prepared samples, bare carbon paper (CP) and commercial Pt/C catalyst. Firstly, the negligible HER activity of CP can be clearly observed through a stable baseline. Among the prepared samples, MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs exhibit more impressive HER activity with the lower overpotentials of 108 mV and 183 mV at the current density of 10 mA/cm², which are smaller than MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (352 mV), MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀ (380 mV), and MoO₃ (895 mV). Even though the HER catalytic activity of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs is lower than that of commercial Pt/C catalyst at 10 mA/cm², it can achieve the comparable performance to benchmark Pt/C at high current densities. The reaction kinetics and mechanism of HER was determined by the Tafel slopes, which are derived from the Tafel equation η = blog|j| + a (Fig. 3b), where "b" is the Tafel slope, "j" is the current density, and "a" is the intercept relative to the exchange current density (j₀) [45]. The Tafel slope of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs are 67.6 mV/dec and 91.6 mV/dec, which are smaller than that of MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (129.3 mV/dec), MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀ (164.1 mV/dec), and MoO₃ (247.9 mV/dec), suggesting the more rapid reaction kinetics at the electrode and electrolyte interface and corresponds to lower overpotentials of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. Such small Tafel slope implies that the low activation energy is required to boost the HER kinetics, and the HER route catalyzed by MoO₃-POM HNSs in acidic electrolyte follows the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism [46]. Furthermore, the MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs exhibit the exchange current density (j₀) of 305 and 288 µA/cm², which are higher than MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (240 µA/cm²), MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀ (234 µA/cm²), and MoO₃ (188 µA/cm²), suggesting the superior intrinsic electrocatalytic activity. According to the electrochemical results in Fig. 3c, it can be inferred that the MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs exhibits the ultrahigh activity with the lowest overpotential and Tafel slope, which is better than most previously reported MoO₃-, POM- and other metal oxide-based electrocatalysts, demonstrating its structural and performance advantages (Fig. 3d, Tables S2 and S3 in Supporting information). To gain further insights, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was conducted. The EIS spectra are depicted in Fig. 3e and reveal that MoO₃-POM HNSs possess the lower charge transfer resistance (R_ct) than other comparative samples (Table S4 in Supporting information), demonstrating the fast electrochemical reaction kinetics and Faradaic process between the interface of electrolyte and MoO₃-POM HNSs catalysts [47].

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) LSV curves, (b) Tafel slopes, (c) the detailed overpotentials and Tafel values of different catalysts in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄. (d) Comparison of overpotentials at 10 mA/cm² with other reported similar electrocatalysts. (e) EIS plots of different catalysts in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) was further estimated from the electrochemical double-layer capacitance (C_dl), which was determined by the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at different scan rates (Fig. S12 in Supporting information). As revealed in Fig. 4a, the C_dl values were calculated to be 28.28, 7.52, 6.85, 3.83, and 1.16 mF/cm² for MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs, MoO₃-SiW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs, MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀, MoO₃@SiW₁₂O₄₀, and MoO₃, respectively [48]. This indicate the hybrid nanobelt superstructures can expose more active sites in the electrochemical process and trigger the rapid onset of HER. The polarization curves of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃ were further normalized by ECSA to rule out the effect of surface area on catalytic performance. The ECSA values were obtained by the equation ECSA = (C_dl × A)/C_s, where A is the area of working electrode, C_s is the specific capacitance of the sample (0.015 mF/cm²) [49]. As shown in Fig. S13 (Supporting information), MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs displays the higher specific activity than MoO₃ under the same condition, revealing the enhanced intrinsic activity of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs than MoO₃ [50]. Additionally, MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs exhibits a turnover frequency (TOF) of 0.257 s^-1 at an overpotential of 100 mV (Fig. 4b and Fig. S14 in Supporting information), which is a 9.5-fold increase over MoO₃ (0.027 s^-1) and higher than MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ (0.037 s^-1) [51]. Multi chronoamperometry result (Fig. 4c) shows that the voltage at individual current density for MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs is significantly lower than that of MoO₃, demonstrating that MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs possess more excellent mass transport property and electrocatalytic activity than MoO₃.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  (a) C_dl values of various samples. (b) TOF values of MoO₃, MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ and MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs at an overpotential of 100 mV. (c) Multi chronoamperometry comparison of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs with MoO₃ at current density of 10–100 mA/cm² in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄ electrolyte. (d) DEMS measurement of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs (inset: the corresponding in situ LSV curve). (e) LSV curves initially and after 1000 CV cycles (inset: the long-term durability tests for 48 h).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In the next step, the generated gas during the water electrolysis process was analyzed via in situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS). As depicted in Fig. 4d, in parallel with the LSV curve, the H₂ generation can be clearly detected by the online analysis record, but no O₂ signal is observed, suggesting the good selectivity of hydrogen evolution of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. It can also be clearly observed that MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs exhibits higher faradaic ion current than that of MoO₃ (Fig. S15 in Supporting information). Moreover, the amount of collected H₂ for MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs is larger than that of MoO₃ and match well with the theoretically calculated value (Fig. S16 in Supporting information), indicating the nearly 100% faradaic efficiency and better electrocatalytic H₂ generation performance. These results prove that the electrolysis has almost no side effects and is beneficial to the high evolution efficiency of H₂ [52]. So as to investigate the electrocatalytic robustness of the MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs catalyst, successive CV curves have been conducted. As shown in Fig. 4e, the LSV curve of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs after recycling 1000 cycles shows negligible changes. Also, the chronoamperometry measurement exhibits that there is no obvious activity degradation of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs after continuous electrolysis for 48 h (the inset of Fig. 4e). These results verify that MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs has good stability in the long-term electrochemical process, illustrating its potential for practical water splitting applications.

  In summary, we have demonstrated that the MoO₃-POM nanobelts superstructures with abundant oxygen vacancies and highly exposed surface were successfully prepared for use as the HER catalyst via a simple hydrothermal method. The obtained MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs need a low overpotential of 108 mV to achieve 10 mA/cm² current density in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄ and show the excellent long-term stability of 48 h. Its electrocatalytic HER performance is not only superior to that of corresponding MoO₃@POM bulk samples and single MoO₃, but also better than most previously reported POMs and MoO₃-based electrocatalysts. Based on experimental characterizations, the excellent HER performances of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs can be attributed to the following aspects: (ⅰ) The MoO₃-POM superstructure with rich oxygen vacancies and highly exposed surface provide abundant adsorption and active sites for the H* adsorption; (ⅱ) The incorporation of POMs improved the electronic mobility and modulated the surface electronic structure of MoO₃, thus accelerating the electron transfer and optimizing the H* adsorption/desorption and dehydrogenation kinetics. This work offers a novel direction to develop metal oxide-based catalyst with high atom utilization efficiency for electrocatalytic H₂ production.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Bowen Li: Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Ting Wang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Resources, Project administration, Data curation, Conceptualization. Ming Xu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration. Yuqi Wang: Validation, Software. Zhaoxing Li: Validation, Software. Mei Liu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration. Wenjing Zhang: Validation, Software. Ming Feng: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Project administration.

  Acknowledgments

  This work is financially supported by the Program for the Development of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (Nos. YDZJ202201ZYTS313, YDZJ202201ZYTS395, 20240402072GH, and 20240101004JJ), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22201097 and 52171210).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110467.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     J. Li, J. Li, J. Ren, et al., Nano-Micro Lett. 14 (2022) 148. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00889-3

  2. [2]

     P.D. Zhao, S.Q. Fu, L.L. Cheng, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 498 (2024) 215452. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215452

  3. [3]

     X.L. Cui, Y.M. Sun, X.X. Xu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107348. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.071

  4. [4]

     L. Zhang, Z.H. Hu, J.T. Huang, et al., J. Adv. Ceram. 11 (2022) 1294–1306. doi: 10.1007/s40145-022-0610-6

  5. [5]

     Y. An, L.L. Wang, W.Y. Jiang, et al., Polyoxometalates 2 (2023) 9140030. doi: 10.26599/pom.2023.9140030

  6. [6]

     F.H. Wang, B.B. Dong, J.W. Wang, et al., J. Adv. Ceram. 11 (2022) 1208–1221. doi: 10.1007/s40145-022-0604-4

  7. [7]

     J.X. Ge, J. Hu, Y.T. Zhu, et al., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 36 (2020) 1906063. doi: 10.3866/pku.whxb201906063

  8. [8]

     J.L. Zhu, J.M. Qian, X.B. Peng, et al., Nano-Micro Lett. 15 (2023) 30. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-01011-3

  9. [9]

     C.R. Pia, C. Huang, Y.X. Yang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 263 (2020) 118358. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118358

  10. [10]

      L.W. Xiong, Y.F. Qiu, X. Peng, et al., Nano Energy 104 (2022) 107882. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107882

  11. [11]

      X. Zhu, L.Y. Chen, Y.G. Liu, et al., Polyoxometalates 2 (2023) 9140031. doi: 10.26599/pom.2023.9140031

  12. [12]

      X.X. Li, X.C. Liu, C. Liu, et al., Tungsten 5 (2023) 100–108. doi: 10.1007/s42864-022-00144-7

  13. [13]

      S. Feng, D.L. Li, H. Dong, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 342 (2024) 123451. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123451

  14. [14]

      D.J. Zang, Y.C. Huang, Q. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 249 (2019) 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.039

  15. [15]

      M.Y. Hou, L.R. Zheng, D. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 1342. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45533-3

  16. [16]

      X. Peng, Y.J. Yan, S.J. Xiong, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 118 (2022) 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.022

  17. [17]

      Y.Y. Zhang, M.X. Chen, P. Guo, et al., Carbon Energy 5 (2023) e351. doi: 10.1002/cey2.351

  18. [18]

      X.L. Wang, X.M. Zhang, Y.F. Xu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 470 (2023) 144370. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144370

  19. [19]

      X. Luo, X. Tan, P.X. Ji, et al., Energy Chem. 5 (2023) 100091. doi: 10.1016/j.enchem.2022.100091

  20. [20]

      G. Huang, M. Hu, X. Xu, et al., Small Struct. 4 (2023) 2200235. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202200235

  21. [21]

      J.Y. Zhang, J.S. Lian, Q. Jiang, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 15 (2022) 3945–3957. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007001

  22. [22]

      Y. Wang, X.P. Li, M.M. Zhang, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2107053. doi: 10.1002/adma.202107053

  23. [23]

      X. Peng, S. Xie, S.J. Xiong, et al., J. Energy Chem. 81 (2023) 574–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.03.022

  24. [24]

      J. Li, Y. Cheng, J.N. Zhang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 27798–27804. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07469

  25. [25]

      X.P. Li, Y. Wang, J.J. Wang, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2003414. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003414

  26. [26]

      F.T. Haase, A. Bergmann, T.E. Jones, et al., Nat. Energy 7 (2022) 765–773. doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01083-w

  27. [27]

      J.L. Liu, N. Liu, H.W. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 17557–17563. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07375

  28. [28]

      Z. Zeb, Y.C. Huang, L.L. Chen, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 482 (2023) 215058. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215058

  29. [29]

      L.B. Ni, J. Gu, X.Y. Jiang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202306528. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306528

  30. [30]

      K. Chen, G.Y. Dai, S.Q. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107638. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.061

  31. [31]

      J. Gautam, K. Kannan, M.M. Meshesha, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 618 (2022) 419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.103

  32. [32]

      J. Gautam, Y. Liu, J. Gu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2106147. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202106147

  33. [33]

      R. Samanta, B.K. Manna, R. Trivedi, et al., Chem. Sci. 15 (2024) 364–378. doi: 10.1039/d3sc04126c

  34. [34]

      J.S. Li, X.J. Sang, W.L. Chen, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 13714–13721. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b03948

  35. [35]

      H.Y. Li, T. Wang, M. Xu, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 987 (2024) 174199. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174199

  36. [36]

      T. Wang, M. Xu, X.H. Li, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 1676–1684. doi: 10.1039/c9qi01486a

  37. [37]

      K.H. Kim, D. Hong, M.G. Kim, et al., ACS Mater. Lett. 5 (2023) 1196–1201. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00022

  38. [38]

      X.D. Wei, Y.D. Chai, N. Liu, et al., Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47 (2022) 9606–9615. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.041

  39. [39]

      Y.F. Liu, Y. Chen, C.M. Liang, et al., Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 51 (2024) 701–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.179

  40. [40]

      C.L. Li, Z.J. Zhang, R. Liu, et al., Small 16 (2020) 2003777. doi: 10.1002/smll.202003777

  41. [41]

      P. Wang, T. Wang, M. Xu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108930. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108930

  42. [42]

      H.H. Luo, L.Q. Yu, K.H. Xue, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 330 (2024) 125373. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125373

  43. [43]

      Y.Y. Fan, Y. Gu, D.X. Wang, et al., J. Energy Chem. 95 (2024) 428–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.04.002

  44. [44]

      J.P. Chen, J.P. Zheng, W.D. He, et al., Nano Res. 16 (2023) 4603–4611. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-5072-1

  45. [45]

      T.V. Nguyen, M. Tekalgne, T.P. Nguyen, et al., Battery Energy 2 (2023) 20220057. doi: 10.1002/bte2.20220057

  46. [46]

      Y.H. Ma, D.F. Leng, X.M. Zhang, et al., Small 18 (2022) 2203173. doi: 10.1002/smll.202203173

  47. [47]

      X. Peng, S. Xie, X. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 20761. doi: 10.1039/d2ta02955c

  48. [48]

      Y.H. Zheng, H.T. Hu, L. Qian, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 652 (2023) 1803–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.09.017

  49. [49]

      C. Li, H. Jang, M.G. Kim, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 307 (2022) 121204. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121204

  50. [50]

      F.H. Yuan, L.L. Ma, Z.D. Cui, et al., Rare Met. 41 (2022) 2624–2632. doi: 10.1007/s12598-022-01967-6

  51. [51]

      C.R. Pi, X.X. Li, X.M. Zhang, et al., Small 18 (2022) 2201137. doi: 10.1002/smll.202201137

  52. [52]

      B.C. Xu, Y.P. Miao, M.Q. Mao, et al., Rare Met. 43 (2024) 2660–2670. doi: 10.1007/s12598-024-02624-w

• 

  Figure 1  (a) Synthesis process schematic of MoO₃-POM HNSs. (b) SEM image, (c) TEM and (d, e) HRTEM images of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. (f) Elemental mappings of Mo, O, P, and W in MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) XRD patterns of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs. (b) Mo 3d, (c) O 1s, and (d) W 4f XPS spectrum of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs and MoO₃. (e) The EPR spectrum and (f) N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms of different catalysts.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) LSV curves, (b) Tafel slopes, (c) the detailed overpotentials and Tafel values of different catalysts in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄. (d) Comparison of overpotentials at 10 mA/cm² with other reported similar electrocatalysts. (e) EIS plots of different catalysts in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  (a) C_dl values of various samples. (b) TOF values of MoO₃, MoO₃@PW₁₂O₄₀ and MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs at an overpotential of 100 mV. (c) Multi chronoamperometry comparison of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs with MoO₃ at current density of 10–100 mA/cm² in 0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄ electrolyte. (d) DEMS measurement of MoO₃-PW₁₂O₄₀ HNSs (inset: the corresponding in situ LSV curve). (e) LSV curves initially and after 1000 CV cycles (inset: the long-term durability tests for 48 h).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•