English

• Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used in energy storage. However, the shortage of lithium supply leads to increasing price for LIBs [1,2]. Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), owing to the abundant resources and widespread geological distribution of sodium, are regarded as LIBs substitutes especially in low-speed electric vehicles and large-scale energy storage systems [3–5]. Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃ (NVP), with a fast Na⁺-transportable NASICON framework, has attracted ubiquitous attention as the alternative cathode material due to potential rate performance and pronounced long-term cycle stability [6]. While, the inherent low electronic conductivity limits the electrochemical performances particularly in high-rate capability [7,8].

  To enhance the rate capability, carbon-coating technique has been applied to improve the electric conductivity. However, carbon limits the particle growth of NVP, which usually results in the small size of NVP and low tap density [9–11]. Single crystal design can improve the tap density, reduce the specific surface area of cathode, and reduce the side reactions between cathode and electrolyte [12], and thus widely explored in SIBs [13]. Unfortunately, the inhibitory effect of the carbon layer on single crystal growth makes the direct preparation of large-sized single crystals in combination with carbon a significant challenge [14]. Based on the above points, it is necessary to develop a simple but effective method that ensures both the formation of a well-established carbon framework and the growth of single crystals, aiming to obtain sodium-ion cathode materials with both high tap density and high electrochemical performance for industrial applications.

  Herein, we propose a single crystalline-like strategy preparing NVP with carbon framework achieved by high-temperature shock (HTS) within ~15 s (Scheme 1). Namely, through a simple solid-state one-pot reaction, the single-crystalline-like NVP materials with a carbon framework and with a size larger than 50 µm were synthesized, which was similar to the size of reported single crystalline NVP prepared by the tube furnace (TF) [14]. It has come to our attention that in previous studies, polymer stabilized droplet templating method was employed for the preparation of single crystalline NVP [14,15], which is characterized by its time-consuming nature and complicated procedures. As a comparison, HTS could efficient prepare single crystalline like NVP materials in an extremely short time. Moreover, HTS has remained the morphology of NVP precursor and the structure of carbon. Furthermore, a novel carbon framework has been created which results in low charge-transfer resistance and excellent dynamic performance. Specifically, the single-carystal-like NVP with carbon framework could deliver 83.5 mAh/g at 50 C. Moreover, it has impressive long-term cycle stability (89.9% after 1600 cycles at 1 C) in half-cell. In addition, the single-carystal-like NVP with carbon framework exhibits high electrochemical performance in full-cell test. This work presents an innovative strategy for the ultrafast preparation of high tap density, high-performance, single-crystalline-like NVP, as well as high-energy-density polyanion cathode materials for SIBs.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Schematic illustration for the synthesis of NVP with HTS or TF.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The synthesis process of NVP with carbon framework is shown in Scheme 1. Briefly, V₂O₅, NaH₂PO₄, oxalic acid and citric acid were mixed through ball-milling method (experimental details are exhibited in Supporting information). And then the mixture was placed on the HTS equipment (Fig. S1 in Supporting information) for a high-temperature shock with heat retention and for 0 s and 15 s in an argon atmosphere at 850 ℃ to obtain sample HTS-850–0s and HTS-850–15s, respectively. For comparison, the mixtures were also placed in a tube furnace and calcined at 800 ℃ under argon atmosphere for 0 s, 6 h to prepare TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h. Fig. 1 depicts the XRD patterns and Raman spectroscopy of as-prepared NVP products, respectively. As shown in Figs. 1a and b and Fig. S2 (Supporting information), all XRD patterns are indexed to highly crystalline rhombohedra phase (R3 c space group), and no impurities are detected, indicating the successful preparation of NVP materials. Tables S1-S4 (Supporting information) show the refined cell parameters of the prepared four NVP samples. And it is evident that there is a minimal difference in lattice parameters between materials prepared by HTS and those prepared by the tube furnace calcination, agreeing with previous reports [16,17]. Meanwhile, Raman spectra was performed to investigate the surface features of four products (Fig. 1c). Two types of carbon bands centered at 1346 and 1593 cm⁻¹ are attributed to the D (disorder carbon, sp³-coordinated behavior) and G (crystalline graphitized carbon, sp²-coordinated behavior) bands of carbon, respectively. The peak intensity ratios of D to G band of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h was calculated, with a value of 0.96, 1.32, 1.35, and 1.42, respectively. Obviously, HTS-850–0s presents lowest value of I_D/I_G, indicating the carbon with sp²-coordinated behavior is predominant. This may be due to the short reaction time and the temperature for HTS-850–0s is unfavorable for carbonization, leading to the abundant presence of the sp² carbon, such as carbon-carbon double bonds, possibly due to the catalytic reaction of carbon precursors by vanadium element in NVP under inert atmosphere and high-temperature conditions [18,19]. To demonstrate this reaction process, NVP synthesized with TF at different temperatures and TF samples for carbon sources were supplemented, and their Raman spectra were analyzed (Fig. 1d). As the temperature and holding time increase, the value of I_D/I_G shows an upward trend, which may be attributed to the transformation of sp² carbon to sp³ carbon with the increasing degree of aromatization and polycondensation [18]. In addition, determined from infrared carbon & sulfur analyzers, the carbon contents of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h are 4.99, 6.14, 7.52, 6.26 wt%, respectively.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  The XRD Rietveld refinements of (a) HTS-850–15s and (b) TF-850–6h. (c) Raman spectrum of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s, and TF-850–6h. (d) I_D/I_G of samples synthesized at different conditions.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The morphology and size of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s, and TF-850–6h were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. As shown in Figs. 2a-d, HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, and TF-850–0s exhibit the similar size with NVP precursor (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), all larger than 50 µm, while TF-850–6h shows smaller size. Additionally, HTS-850–0s and HTS-850–15s show smooth and flat particle surface as well as NVP precursor, which like the morphology of single crystal [20–22], while TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h exhibit rough surface. This may be due to the ultrafast heating rate and short sintering time which result in the incomplete decomposition of carbon coating in HTS-850–0s and HTS-850–15s [18]. Whereas, complete decomposition of carbon coating, and neck growth at low temperatures without densification in sintering leads to the morphology which shown as TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h (Figs. 2c and d) [23]. The high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) image (Fig. 2e and Fig. S4a) reveals a ca. 3–5 nm carbon layer on HTS-850–15s and 8–10 nm carbon layer on TF-850–6h, which could protect NVP from electrolyte erosion and enhance dynamic performance. Moreover, carbon tends to form carbon framework in HTS-850–15s (Fig. 2f) while agglomerating on the surface of NVP particle in TF-850–6h (Fig. S4b). Additionally, as shown in Figs. 2e and f, secondary particles are aggregated by primary particles linked through carbon framework in HTS-850–15s. This is distinct from TF-850–6h materials, which are solely coated with carbon. The variation in thickness and morphology of carbon species may be attributed to the different heating and holding conditions during the production of HTS-850–15s and TF-850–6h samples.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  SEM images of (a) HTS-850–0s, (b) HTS-850–15s, (c) TF-850–0s, (d) TF-850–6h. (e, f) TEM images of HTS-850–15s.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Fig. 3 exhibits the electrochemical performances of half-cells for all samples. Fig. 3a exhibits the galvanostatic charge-discharge curves at 0.1 C (1 C = 117 mA/g). All electrodes display a voltage plateau around 3.4 V which corresponds to the redox of V³⁺/V⁴⁺. Meanwhile, the four materials exhibit similar initial reversible capacity. Specifically, 110.6 mAh/g (HTS-850–0s), 110.0 mAh/g (HTS-850–15s), 107.7 mAh/g (TF-850–0s) and 106.7 mAh/g (TF-850–6h). Fig. 3b displays the rate performances of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s and TF-850–6h. All NVP materials deliver comparable discharge capacity at the rate of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10 C. However, HTS-850–15s (97.1 mAh/g) and TF-850–6h (96.2 mAh/g) display higher reversible capacity compared to the other samples at 15 C. Meanwhile, the more obvious differences started at 30 C (Fig. 3b, Figs. S5 and S6 in Supporting information). HTS-850–15s (91.3 mAh/g) exhibits the highest reversible capacity, followed by TF-850–6h (87.8 mAh/g), TF-850–0s (74.2 mAh/g) and HTS-850–0s (68.4 mAh/g). Even at a high rate of 50 C, HTS-850–15s still exhibits a high specific capacity of 83.5 mAh/g. Comparison of rate performance of HTS-850–15s to the recent results in the literature for NVP is displayed in Fig. 3c and Table S5 (Supporting information) [24–34]. Obviously, the HTS-850–15s material's performance is at the mainstream level among all the listed samples. Additionally, EIS is carried out to investigate internal impedance. The semicircles at medium frequency are associated with charge-transfer resistance at the interface (R_ct). As shown in Fig. 3d, HTS-850–15s exhibits the lowest R_ct, caused by the unique carbon framework, resulting in the best rate performance. Moreover, GITT was employed to estimate the Na⁺ diffusion coefficient in four samples (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). As shown in Figs. 3e and f, the Na⁺ diffusion coefficient of HTS-850–0s and HTS-850–15s seems lower in charge-discharge process, which might result from the long Na⁺ diffuse path in large particle size [20–22]. And the rate results (Fig. 3b) and previous study in other literature [35] has proved that the lower Na⁺ diffusion coefficient is not in contradiction with the high rate performance of NVP. In Fig. 3g, superior capacity retention had been demonstrated among all samples at 1 C. HTS-850–15s delivers a high capacity retention with 89.9% after 1600 cycles and nearly 100% Coulombic efficiency was achieved among the whole cycle life. Besides, higher tap density (≈0.98 g/cm³) for HTS-NVP has been measured in Table S6 (Supporting information), which matches the results of NVP particle size and cycle stability.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  Electrochemical performance of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s, and TF-850–6h. (a) Charge-discharge profiles at a current rate of 0.1 C. (b) Rate performances from 0.1 C to 50 C at voltage window of 2.3–4 V. (c) Comparison of rate performance of HTS-850–15s to the recent results in the literature for NVP. (d) Electrochemical impedance spectra. (e) Comparation of Na⁺ diffusion coefficient calculated by GITT at charge process. (f) Comparation of Na⁺ diffusion coefficient calculated by GITT at discharge process. (g) Cycling performance at 1 C.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To further demonstrate the practical application of the prepared NVP materials, full-cells were assembled with HTS-850–15s cathode and presodiated hard carbon (HC) anode, abbreviated as HC//HTS-850–15s. As shown in Fig. 4a, the charge/discharge curves of HTS-850–15s exhibit a voltage plateau around 3.4 V and the reversible specific capacity of 110 mAh/g in half-cell test, while the hard carbon exhibits continuous charge/discharge curves with the reversible specific capacity of 283.5 mAh/g. And the HC//HTS-850–15s full-cell exhibits initial discharge specific capacity of 108.7 mAh/g at 1 C (Fig. 4b). After 1000 cycles, the full-cell still exhibits 75.6 mAh/g with high capacity retention (69.5%), exhibiting good cycling stability (Fig. 4c). As shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the capacity fade was not caused by HTS-850–15s cathode. The results indicate the as-prepared NVP materials are feasible for practical SIBs application.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Electrochemical behavior of HC//HTS-850–15s full-cells. (a) The charge-discharge profiles of HTS-850–15s cathode and commercial hard carbon anode in half cell. (b) The charge-discharge profiles of HC//HTS-850–15s. (c) Cycling performance at 1 C.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In this work, a single crystalline like NVP with excellent long cycle stability, outstanding rate performance, and high tap density has been developed using HTS and solid-state one-pot reaction method for SIBs application. Combining SEM and TEM, we conclude that the impressive performance own to the unique carbon framework and large particle size. HTS-850–15s delivers a high reversible capacity of 110 mAh/g and 89.9% capacity retention after 1600 cycles and nearly 100% Coulombic efficiency among the whole cycle life. This work raises a new strategy for the production of high tap density, and outstanding electrochemical performance polyanionic cathode materials for SIBs.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22109091) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2021QB180).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109643.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     P.K. Nayak, L. Yang, W. Brehm, P. Adelhelm, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 102–120. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703772

  2. [2]

     Z. Guo, G. Qian, C. Wang, et al., Prog. Nat. Sci. 33 (2023) 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2022.12.003

  3. [3]

     L. Shen, Y. Li, S. Roy, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3570–3574. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.005

  4. [4]

     J. Feng, S. Luo, K. Cai, X. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 2316–2326. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.077

  5. [5]

     K. Liang, D. Wu, Y. Ren, X. Huang, J. Ma, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107978. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107978

  6. [6]

     Z. Jian, Y.S. Hu, X. Ji, W. Chen, Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1601925. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601925

  7. [7]

     Q. Wang, S. Chu, S. Guo, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2167–2176. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.008

  8. [8]

     N.T. Aristote, K. Zou, A. Di, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 730–742. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.049

  9. [9]

     Y. Xu, Q. Wei, C. Xu, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 6 (2016) 1600389. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600389

  10. [10]

      Y.L. Zhao, X.X. Cao, G.Z. Fang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 339 (2018) 162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.088

  11. [11]

      X.H. Liu, E.H. Wang, G.L. Feng, et al., Electrochim. Acta 286 (2018) 231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.052

  12. [12]

      L. Ni, S. Zhang, A. Di, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 12 (2022) 2201510. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202201510

  13. [13]

      J. Lamb, K. Jarvis, A. Manthiram, Small 18 (2022) 2106927. doi: 10.1002/smll.202106927

  14. [14]

      H. Xiong, G. Sun, Z. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 10334–10341. doi: 10.1002/anie.202100954

  15. [15]

      M. Su, J. Shi, Q. Kang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 432 (2022) 134289. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134289

  16. [16]

      Z. Tian, Y. Chen, J. Cheng, et al., Ceram. Int. 47 (2021) 22025–22034. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.222

  17. [17]

      R.S. Kate, S.V. Kadam, M.V. Kulkarni, et al., J. Energy Storage 74 (2023) 109245. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109245

  18. [18]

      X.W. Dou, I. Hasa, D. Saurel, et al., Mater. Today 23 (2019) 87–104. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040

  19. [19]

      R.R. Langeslay, D.M. Kaphan, C.L. Marshall, et al., Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 2128–2191. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00245

  20. [20]

      F. Zhang, S. Lou, S. Li, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 3050. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16824-2

  21. [21]

      X. Fan, X. Ou, W. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 5320. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25611-6

  22. [22]

      X. Ou, T. Liu, W. Zhong, et al., Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 2319. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30020-4

  23. [23]

      C. Wang, W. Ping, Q. Bai, et al., Science 368 (2020) 521–526. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7681

  24. [24]

      Y. Fang, L. Xiao, X. Ai, Y. Cao, H. Yang, Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 5895–5900. doi: 10.1002/adma.201502018

  25. [25]

      Y. Jiang, Z. Yang, W. Li, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 5 (2015) 1402104. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201402104

  26. [26]

      W. Ren, Z. Zheng, C. Xu, et al., Nano Energy 25 (2016) 145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.018

  27. [27]

      J. Zhang, Y. Fang, L. Xiao, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 7177–7184. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16000

  28. [28]

      Q. Ni, Y. Bai, Y. Li, et al., Small 14 (2018) 1702864. doi: 10.1002/smll.201702864

  29. [29]

      J. Zhang, W. Liu, H. Hu, et al., Electrochim. Acta 292 (2018) 736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.007

  30. [30]

      Y. Jiang, X. Zhou, D. Li, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (2018) 1800068. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800068

  31. [31]

      P.N. Didwal, R. Verma, C.W. Min, C.J. Park, J. Power Sources. 413 (2019) 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.018

  32. [32]

      S.K. Pal, R. Thirupathi, S. Chakrabarty, S. Omar, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3 (2020) 12054–12065. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02188

  33. [33]

      M. Jiang, D. Xu, B. Yang, C. Zhang, M. Cao, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2021) 2100188. doi: 10.1002/admi.202100188

  34. [34]

      L. Liang, X. Li, F. Zhao, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2100287. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202100287

  35. [35]

      X. Jiang, T. Zhang, J.Y. Lee, J. Power Sources 372 (2017) 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.075

• 

  Scheme 1  Schematic illustration for the synthesis of NVP with HTS or TF.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  The XRD Rietveld refinements of (a) HTS-850–15s and (b) TF-850–6h. (c) Raman spectrum of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s, and TF-850–6h. (d) I_D/I_G of samples synthesized at different conditions.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  SEM images of (a) HTS-850–0s, (b) HTS-850–15s, (c) TF-850–0s, (d) TF-850–6h. (e, f) TEM images of HTS-850–15s.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  Electrochemical performance of HTS-850–0s, HTS-850–15s, TF-850–0s, and TF-850–6h. (a) Charge-discharge profiles at a current rate of 0.1 C. (b) Rate performances from 0.1 C to 50 C at voltage window of 2.3–4 V. (c) Comparison of rate performance of HTS-850–15s to the recent results in the literature for NVP. (d) Electrochemical impedance spectra. (e) Comparation of Na⁺ diffusion coefficient calculated by GITT at charge process. (f) Comparation of Na⁺ diffusion coefficient calculated by GITT at discharge process. (g) Cycling performance at 1 C.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Electrochemical behavior of HC//HTS-850–15s full-cells. (a) The charge-discharge profiles of HTS-850–15s cathode and commercial hard carbon anode in half cell. (b) The charge-discharge profiles of HC//HTS-850–15s. (c) Cycling performance at 1 C.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•