English

• Allenes extensively exist in numerous natural products, materials, and pharmaceuticals due to their excellent bioactivities and reactivities (Fig. 1a) [1,2]. Among the different classes of allenes, 2,3-allenols are also important building blocks in advanced organic synthesis [3–18] as they provide expeditious routes to a wide range of useful compounds such as 1,3-enynes [19,20], dihydrofurans [21,22], furanone [23,24], dienes [25,26], vinyl epoxides [27,28], and other heterocycles [29–31]. Owing to the versatility of these ubiquitous motifs, substantial efforts have been devoted including the transition metal catalyzed ring opening of propargyl epoxides with organometallic reagents such as Grignard [32,33], organolithium [34], organozinc [35], and organoboron reagent [36]. This methodology has met with considerable success in offering access to a variety of 2,3-allenols via the formation of C—C bonds based on the use of carbon-nucleophiles. Few examples were reported for the preparation of 2,3-allenols via the formation of C-heteroatom (C—Si or C—B, C—P bond) [37–40].

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Some representative examples of biologically active allenes (a) and organothiophosphates (b).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  On the other hand, phosphorothioates are also essential structural motifs found in a variety of biologically active molecules, natural products, and pharmaceuticals, with remarkable biological and medicinal properties [41–46], involving anticancer, antivirals, cardioprotective-therapeutics, and inhibitor properties (Fig. 1b) [47]. Moreover, phosphorothioates also acted as organic intermediates to prepare complex molecules [48–51]. Numerous efforts have been made in introducing phosphorothioates into alkene, aryl rings, or alkylane compounds. However, reports of the introduction of phosphorothioates into the allenyl skeleton were very rare in recent years. Xiao and Song's group successfully reported a green and high-efficiency method for the synthesis of allenyl organothiophosphates from propargylic alcohols (Scheme 1a) [52]. However, alkyl-substituted tertiary propargylic alcohols failed to give the target products. And this method was limited to the synthesis of tetrasubstituted allenyl thiophosphates, and a trace amount of trisubstituted allenyl thiophosphates were obtained. Consequently, the development of a highly efficient method to access trisubstituted allenyl organothiophosphates from elemental sulfur is an important topic in phosphorus chemistry.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  The three-component reaction of propargylic cyclic carbonate with H-phosphonate and elemental sulfur.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Propargylic cyclic carbonates have acted as versatile building blocks [53–63], and they have also been comprehensively applied in organic synthesis over the past decade. Typically, propargylic cyclic carbonates undergo facile decarboxylation in the presence of a copper catalyst to generate a copper allenylidene intermediate I, which might either tautomerize to a cationic intermediate II that induces nucleophilic attacks at position α and γ. Given the relatively prominent electrophilicity of position γ, cationic intermediate II could be used as tertiary carbon electrophiles for the construction of tetrasubstituted stereocenters bearing terminal alkyne and primary alcohol groups. In addition, the zwitterionic intermediate can undergo asymmetric cyclization reactions to produce chiral heterocycles [53–56,64,65]. To the best of our knowledge, few examples of the application of terminal alkynyl cyclic carbonates for the creating allenes bearing hydroxymethyl group from attacking at position α have been reported [66,67]. Yuan and coworkers reported Cu-catalyzed decarboxylative thiolation of propargylic cyclic carbonates with thiols to afford allenyl thioethers (Scheme 1b) [66]. And decarboxylative phosphonylation of propargylic cyclic carbonates was also reported to furnish syn-4-phosphonyl 2,3-allenols [67]. However, the trace amount of product or no product were yielded using alkyl-substituted propargylic cyclic carbonates as candidate. Inspired by these facts and our continuous interest [56], we proposed a Cu-catalyzed C-S-P bond formation from elemental sulfur to access to trisubstituted allenyl phosphorothioates with good yields and regioselectivities under mild reaction conditions.

  We commenced our investigation by choosing propargylic cyclic carbonate 1a and diethyl phosphorthiolic acid 2a [(EtO)₂P(O)SH] as the model substrates in the presence of Cu(CH₃CN)₄PF₆ (5 mol%), DIPEA (2.0 equiv.), and L1 (10 mol%) (Table 1, entry 1). It was found that the desired allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa could be obtained in 18% yield. Then, the effects of different copper catalysts were investigated (Table 1, entries 1–4), and the results indicated that Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ was the best choice. When tridentate ligand L1 was switched to bipyridine ligands L2-L5 (Table 1, entries 5–8), no better results were obtained. It was found that the use of 1,10-phenanthroline with nitro group L6 improved the yield of 3aa to 40% (Table 1, entry 9). Afterward, kinds of bases were evaluated for this reaction, results indicated that the base greatly influenced the reaction activity (Table 1, entries 10–13). To our delight, the desired allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa was furnished in 80% yield in the presence of DABCO as the base. The other nonproton solvents, such as THF or DCM, led to the desired product in diminished yields (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). Further examination of catalyst loading, ligand loading, substrate concentration, and reaction time improved the yield of 3aa to 92% (Table 1, entry 16). The configuration of allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa was testified via ¹H-¹H NOSEY.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  With the optimized conditions in hand, the scopes of the propargylic cyclic carbonates were investigated using diethyl phosphorthiolic acid 2a as a phosphorothiolation reagent. As summarized in Scheme 2, a broad range of allenyl phosphorothioates were readily prepared with good yield and excellent regioselectivities. The reaction using aromatic propargylic cyclic carbonates bearing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups at the para-position proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding allenyl phosphorothioates 3ba-3ja, these results showed that electron-donating substrates showed a lower reactivity. Halogen substituents on the phenyl ring were well tolerated, furnishing corresponding products in 72% and 75% yield. An investigation of the influence of the substitution pattern of the phenyl ring revealed that substituents at meta- and ortho-position had little effect on reactivity, with the corresponding allenyl phosphorothioates 3ka-3qa being produced in moderate to good yields. Multisubstituted phenyl propargylic cyclic carbonates were also suitable substrates to furnish the corresponding products 3ra and 3sa in 62% and 61% yield, respectively. The reactions of α- or β-naphthyl propargylic cyclic carbonates afforded compounds 3ta-3va in 52%–71% yield. When the phenyl ring was replaced with a fused fluorenyl ring, the reaction proceeded smoothly and produced product 3wa in 71% yield. It was worth noting that alkyl-substituted propargylic cyclic carbonate could transform the desired product 3xa in 38% yield. The reason for the low yield of 3xa could be the instability of alkyl substituted copper allenylidene intermediate.

  Scheme 2

  

  Scheme 2.  The scope of propargylic cyclic carbonates. Reaction conditions: 1b-1x (0.11 mmol), 2a (0.10 mmol), Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (2.5 mol%), L6 (5 mol%), DABCO (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), toluene (1 mL), r.t., 4 h, air. ^a Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (5 mol%), L6 (10 mol%), DABCO (0.2 mmol, 2.0 equiv.).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As an initial attempt, reacting propargylic cyclic carbonate 1a (0.11 mmol) with diethyl H-phosphonate (0.1 mmol) and elemental sulfur (0.1 mmol) was investigated under standard reaction conditions. The reaction provided the desired product 3aa in 60% yield, albeit with the original material. Further screening demonstrated that the molar ratio of the substrate (1a:2b:S = 1.3:1:1) was the best and to furnish the allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa in 86% yield (Table S1 in Supporting information). Various propargylic cyclic carb onates were investigated with diethyl H-phosphonate and elemental sulfur under the above optimal conditions (Scheme 3). A series of allenyl phosphorothioates (3aa-3pa) were achieved in good to excellent yields. To our delight, the three-component reaction for alkyl-substituted propargylic cyclic carbonate could smoothly transform into the corresponding product 3xa in 24% yield. Noteworthily, the three-component reaction showed better reactivities in this transformation than using diethyl phosphorthiolic acid counterparts in most cases.

  Scheme 3

  

  Scheme 3.  The scope of propargylic cyclic carbonates for three-component reaction. Reaction conditions: 1b-1p (0.13 mmol), 2b (0.10 mmol), S₈ (0.1 mmol), Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (2.5 mol%), L6 (5 mol%), DABCO (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), toluene (1 mL), r.t., 4 h, air.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To get insight into the application of the present protocol, gram scale transformation was accomplished (Scheme 4). The allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa can be prepared from 1a and 2a, providing the desired product in 76% yield. Meantime, a three-component gram scale reaction was smoothly transformed into desired products 3aa in 80% yield. In addition, an esterification reaction was also smoothly performed to give the corresponding product 5aaa in 86% yield. The trans-1,3-diene 5aab was obtained in 38% isolated yield via the cross-coupling reaction of allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa with biphenyl boronic acid 4b in the presence of palladium catalyst.

  Scheme 4

  

  Scheme 4.  The gram-scale reaction and application of 3aa.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Based on the above experiment results and referring to previous reporters on Cu-catalyzed decarboxylative substitution of propargylic cyclic carbonate [56,66–68], a plausible mechanism for the three component reactions was proposed in Scheme 5. Under the base condition, the deprotonation of the propargyl carbonate 1a under Cu(I) catalysis would generate a copper acetylide species B [69], which undergoes decarboxylation to form a copper-acetylide cation intermediate C, further isomerizes to copper allenylidene intermediate D. Meantime, the treatment of elemental sulfur with H-phosphonates would yield diethyl phosphorthiolic acid 2b, which will be further deprotonated by DABCO gave sulfur anion E [70]. Then, sulfur anion E would trap copper allenylidene intermediate D to form intermediate F. The subsequent protonation of intermediate F furnished the allenyl phosphorothioate 3aa and the copper catalyst A.

  Scheme 5

  

  Scheme 5.  A plausible mechanism.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, we have developed an efficient and practical method for the synthesis of allenyl phosphorothioates featuring trisubstituted allenyl scaffolds from propargylic cyclic carbonates and elemental sulfur and H-phosphonates under inexpensive copper as the catalyst. This protocol can be easily scaled up and applied, as a demonstration, in the synthesis of trans-butadiene bearing phosphorothioates.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: There are no conflicts to declare

  Acknowledgment

  This work was supported by the Educational Foundation of Zhejiang University of Technology (No. KYY-HX-20220471).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109617.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     V.M. Dembitsky, T. Maoka, Prog. Lipid. Res. 46 (2007) 328–375. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2007.07.001

  2. [2]

     A. Hoffmann-Röder, N. Krause, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 1196–1216. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300628

  3. [3]

     C. Aubert, L. Fensterbank, P. Garcia, M. Malacria, A. Simonneau, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 1954–1993. doi: 10.1021/cr100376w

  4. [4]

     K.M. Brummond, J.E. DeForrest, Synthesis 2007 (2007) 795–818. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965963

  5. [5]

     Z. Duan, M. Liu, B. Zheng, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 3298–3302. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01066

  6. [6]

     Y. Jiang, A.B. Diagne, R.J. Thomson, S.E. Schaus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 1998–2005. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11937

  7. [7]

     M.B. Li, D. Posevins, A. Geoffroy, C. Zhu, J.E. Backvall, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 1992–1996. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911462

  8. [8]

     M.B. Li, D. Posevins, K.P.J. Gustafson, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 210–215. doi: 10.1002/chem.201805118

  9. [9]

     L. Liu, R.M. Ward, J.M. Schomaker, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 12422–12490. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00312

  10. [10]

      S. Ma, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 2829–2872. doi: 10.1021/cr020024j

  11. [11]

      S. Ma, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 1679–1688. doi: 10.1021/ar900153r

  12. [12]

      J. Naapuri, J.D. Rolfes, J. Keil, C.M. Sapu, J. Deska, Green Chem. 19 (2017) 447–452. doi: 10.1039/C6GC01926A

  13. [13]

      H. Tsukamoto, K. Ito, T. Doi, Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 5102–5105. doi: 10.1039/C8CC02589D

  14. [14]

      S. Yu, S. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 3074–3112. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101460

  15. [15]

      J. Zhang, X. Huo, J. Xiao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 12622–12632. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c05087

  16. [16]

      B. Xiang, Y. Wang, C. Xiao, F. He, Y. Huang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108777–108781. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108777

  17. [17]

      J. Qian, Z. Chen, Y. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107479–107482. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.077

  18. [18]

      Y. Que, W. Lei, Y. Fang, S. He, Y. Chen, Green. Synth. Catal. (2023), doi:10.1016/ j.gresc.2023.11.010.

  19. [19]

      Y. Choe, P.H. Lee, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 1445–1448. doi: 10.1021/ol9001703

  20. [20]

      Y. Deng, X. Jin, C. Fu, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 2169–2172. doi: 10.1021/ol9004273

  21. [21]

      B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, A. Luna, E. Soriano, J. Org. Chem. 80 (2015) 7050–7057. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00887

  22. [22]

      D.A. Mundal, K.E. Lutz, R.J. Thomson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 5782–5785. doi: 10.1021/ja301489n

  23. [23]

      S. Li, B. Miao, W. Yuan, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 977–979. doi: 10.1021/ol4000197

  24. [24]

      E. Yoneda, T. Kaneko, S. Zhang, K. Onitsuka, S. Takahashi, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 441–443. doi: 10.1021/ol990377d

  25. [25]

      S. Ma, Z. Gu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 6182–6183. doi: 10.1021/ja0500815

  26. [26]

      S. Webster, P.C. Young, G. Barker, G.M. Rosair, A.L. Lee, J. Org. Chem. 80 (2015) 1703–1718. doi: 10.1021/jo502648w

  27. [27]

      R.W. Friesen, M. Blouin, J. Org. Chem. 58 (1993) 1653–1654. doi: 10.1021/jo00059a006

  28. [28]

      S. Ma, S. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 7943–7944. doi: 10.1021/ja9904888

  29. [29]

      B. Alcaide, P. Almendros, J.M. Alonso, I. Fernandez, S. Khodabakhshi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 356 (2014) 1370–1374. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201301127

  30. [30]

      Y. He, X. Zhang, X. Fan, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 16263–16266. doi: 10.1039/C5CC06150D

  31. [31]

      Q. Li, X. Jiang, C. Fu, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 13 (2011) 466–469. doi: 10.1021/ol102811x

  32. [32]

      G. Chai, Z. Lu, C. Fu, S. Ma, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351 (2009) 1946–1954. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200900091

  33. [33]

      B. Chen, Z. Lu, G. Chai, C. Fu, S. Ma, J. Org. Chem. 73 (2008) 9486–9489. doi: 10.1021/jo801809j

  34. [34]

      A. Alexakis, I. Marek, P. Mangeney, J.F. Normant, Tetrahedron Lett. 30 (1989) 2391–2392. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)80407-X

  35. [35]

      F. Bertozzi, P. Crotti, F. Macchia, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999) 4893–4896. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)00905-3

  36. [36]

      M. Yoshida, H. Ueda, M. Ihara, Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 6705–6708. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.07.134

  37. [37]

      J. Kjellgren, H. Sundén, K.J. Szabó, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 1787–1796. doi: 10.1021/ja043951b

  38. [38]

      J. Zhao, K.J. Szabó, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 1502–1506. doi: 10.1002/anie.201510132

  39. [39]

      T.S.N. Zhao, Y. Yang, T. Lessing, K.J. Szabó, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 7563–7566. doi: 10.1021/ja502792s

  40. [40]

      R. Shen, J. Yang, H. Zhao, et al., Chem. Commun. 52 (2016) 11959–11962. doi: 10.1039/C6CC05428E

  41. [41]

      P.J.J. Huang, F. Wang, J. Liu, Anal. Chem. 87 (2015) 6890–6895. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01362

  42. [42]

      T.S. Kumar, T. Yang, S. Mishra, et al., J. Med. Chem. 56 (2013) 902–914. doi: 10.1021/jm301372c

  43. [43]

      N.S. Li, J.K. Frederiksen, J.A. Piccirilli, Acc. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 1257–1269. doi: 10.1021/ar200131t

  44. [44]

      M.D. McReynolds, J.M. Dougherty, P.R. Hanson, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 2239–2258. doi: 10.1021/cr020109k

  45. [45]

      T. Ozturk, E. Ertas, O. Mert, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 3419–3478. doi: 10.1021/cr900243d

  46. [46]

      J.D. Ye, C.D. Barth, P.R. Anjaneyulu, T. Tuschl, J.A. Piccirilli, Org. Biomol. Chem. 5 (2007) 2491–2497. doi: 10.1039/b707205h

  47. [47]

      T. Kasagami, T. Miyamoto, I. Yamamoto, Pest Manage. Sci. 58 (2002) 1107–1117. doi: 10.1002/ps.546

  48. [48]

      A.M. Lauer, F. Mahmud, J. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 9119–9123. doi: 10.1021/ja202954b

  49. [49]

      Y. Qiu, J.C. Worch, W.D.N. Chirdon, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 7746–7751. doi: 10.1002/chem.201402561

  50. [50]

      M. Sekine, T. Hata, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 2044–2049. doi: 10.1021/ja00345a062

  51. [51]

      M. Sekine, T. Hata, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108 (1986) 4581–4586. doi: 10.1021/ja00275a052

  52. [52]

      Y. Zhang, S. Du, T. Yang, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 3156–3162. doi: 10.1039/D2QO00455K

  53. [53]

      T.T. Li, Y. You, T. Sun, et al., Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 5120–5125. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01959

  54. [54]

      W.Y. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. You, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 1779–1788. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02621

  55. [55]

      Y.C. Zhang, B.W. Zhang, R. Geng, J. Song, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 7907–7911. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03454

  56. [56]

      S. Zuo, Y. Tao, Z. Liu, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 410–415. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c04113

  57. [57]

      F. Gong, X. Meng, S. Lan, et al., ACS Catal. 12 (2022) 12036–12044. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03623

  58. [58]

      C. Xu, H. Zhang, S. Lan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202219064. doi: 10.1002/anie.202219064

  59. [59]

      K. Guo, A.W. Kleij, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 4901–4906. doi: 10.1002/anie.202014310

  60. [60]

      K. Guo, Q. Zeng, A. Yanez, C. Bo, A.W. Kleij, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 637–641. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04086

  61. [61]

      G.S. Sontakke, R.K. Shukla, C.M.R. Volla, Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 565–573. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202101064

  62. [62]

      X. Wang, S. Woodward, N. Krause, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009 (2009) 2836–2844. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200900226

  63. [63]

      K. Guo, A. Kleij, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 3942–3945. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01222

  64. [64]

      M. Wang, B. Li, B. Gong, H. Yao, A. Lin, Chem. Commun. 58 (2022) 2850–2853. doi: 10.1039/D1CC07058D

  65. [65]

      Z.J. Zhang, L. Zhang, R. Geng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 12190–12194. doi: 10.1002/anie.201907188

  66. [66]

      W.Y. Lu, Y. You, T. Li, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 6711–6720. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c00453

  67. [67]

      T.T. Li, W.Y. Lu, L.W. Shen, et al., Tetrahedron 104 (2022) 132606. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2021.132606

  68. [68]

      J. Gόmez, Ảlex. Cristὸfol, A.W. Kleji, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 3903–3907. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814242

  69. [69]

      S. Wang, X. Xia, Q. Chen, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 (2024) 5158–5167. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c17607

  70. [70]

      C. Qu, R. Liu, Z. Wang, et al., Green Chem. 24 (2022) 4915–4920. doi: 10.1039/D2GC00903J

• 

  Figure 1  Some representative examples of biologically active allenes (a) and organothiophosphates (b).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 1  The three-component reaction of propargylic cyclic carbonate with H-phosphonate and elemental sulfur.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 2  The scope of propargylic cyclic carbonates. Reaction conditions: 1b-1x (0.11 mmol), 2a (0.10 mmol), Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (2.5 mol%), L6 (5 mol%), DABCO (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), toluene (1 mL), r.t., 4 h, air. ^a Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (5 mol%), L6 (10 mol%), DABCO (0.2 mmol, 2.0 equiv.).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 3  The scope of propargylic cyclic carbonates for three-component reaction. Reaction conditions: 1b-1p (0.13 mmol), 2b (0.10 mmol), S₈ (0.1 mmol), Cu(CH₃CN)₄BF₄ (2.5 mol%), L6 (5 mol%), DABCO (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), toluene (1 mL), r.t., 4 h, air.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 4  The gram-scale reaction and application of 3aa.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 5  A plausible mechanism.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  下载: 导出CSV
•