English

• Photocatalysis is a promising new energy conversion technology and pollutant treatment technology [1-4]. Polymeric carbon nitride (g-C₃N₄), as a common organic semiconductor photocatalysts, has been applied in the fields of energy and environmental remediation due to its visible light responsiveness, robust stability, high wear resistance, excellent physicochemical properties and low synthesis cost [5-9]. However, the low charge separation and transfer efficiency of bulk C₃N₄ restrict its further development [10-13]. To overcome the challenge of constraints and enhance unsatisfactory performance, various effective strategies have been probed, such as the establishment of defects, doping of heterogeneous elements, construction of heterojunctions, and nanostructures [14-19]. Nevertheless, it is imperative to develop and use multiple charge transport tunnels.

  The ultra-high conductivity metal seems to be the best candidate for modifying g-C₃N₄. In particular, the introduction of atom-sized metals can not only maximize the utilization of metals but also improve the charge separation and transfer efficiency of g-C₃N₄ [20-23]. For example, various noble or non-noble metal single atoms (Au, Pt, Pd, Cu, Co, etc.) have been immobilized on g-C₃N₄, because these metal atoms can be anchored at rich N sites [24-26]. The metal atom fixed carbon nitride can effectively improve photocatalytic performance because the atom acts as an effective electron acceptor in the separation and transfer of photogenerated carriers in the plane [27-30]. Thus, the introduction of metal atoms in the g-C₃N₄ plane of the pyrazine (herbicide) conjugate can change the spatial charge transfer pathway [31]. However, in-plane doping alone is insufficient to further promote photocatalytic performance, among which, the most effective challenge is to improve the charge transfer between layers (adjacent layers of g-C₃N₄). This is mainly because the intrinsic planar layered structure of g-C₃N₄ is destroyed along with the weakening of electron transfer in the flat layer [32,33]. The basic understanding is that the electronic structure of g-C₃N₄ consists of sp² hybrid π delocalized electrons and lone electrons in N-pz orbit [34,35]. Bending the structure of g-C₃N₄ from the plane structure to the spherical structure will cause the electronic structure to deform and compress in the mixed intermediateness between sp² and sp³, further causing the delocalized π electrons to migrate from the concave to the convex [36,37]. The formation of a hollow spherical structure is an effective method for bending layered g-C₃N₄. This will eventually result in a significant potential difference between the inner and outer surfaces of the g-C₃N₄ hollow nanospheres due to the uneven distribution of electrons. Therefore, the potential difference of g-C₃N₄ hollow nanospheres as the motive power will stimulate the e⁻ to conquer the electrostatic barrier of the interlayer and shift to the outer layer of g-C₃N₄ hollow nanospheres [38,39]. In addition, the hollow nanosphere structure can enhance the light scattering and photosensitivity of g-C₃N₄ or their composites. In a word, hollow sphere structure is an effective method to improve photocatalytic performance, which has been widely proved.

  Therefore, we prepared hollow g-C₃N₄ nanospheres (HC₃N₄) and loaded Cu single atoms as electron acceptors on the surface of Cu-HC₃N₄. Multiple testing methods demonstrated that single Cu atoms were embedded in the C₃N₄ plane, and had an enormous capacity to enhance charge separation and transfer within the plane. The hollow nanosphere structure enhanced charge separation and transfer in the interlayer. Therefore, under visible light irradiation, Cu single atom-modified, hollow g-C₃N₄ nanospheres exhibited excellent performance in the selective oxidation of benzene to phenol and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. The molecular structure engineering strategy of introducing the bending of the delocalized π electrons of g-C₃N₄ provided a new option for promoting oriented charge transfer between nanolayers and is applicable to other single-atom functional materials.

  As shown in Fig. 1a, we used SiO₂ as the hard template to synthesize HC₃N₄ nanospheres by thermal polymerization. Then, monoatomic copper is loaded, and finally hollow carbon nitride loaded with monoatomic copper is formed. Single atoms of copper show bright spots in high resolution high angle ring dark field (HAADF) to determine whether it exists. As shown in Fig. 1b, multiple bright spots with uniform size and uniform distribution are presented, proving that the product contains Cu in the form of a single atom. Furthermore, the synthesized HC₃N₄ is composed of C, N and Cu elements and proved by element mapping. More excitingly, it can be observed that Cu is uniformly distributed on the entire carbon nitride carrier. The loaded copper content was monitored as 0.50 ± 0.02 wt% by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). As displayed in Fig. S2 (Supporting information), the Cu-HC₃N₄ is the nanospheres structure. Furthermore, it can be seen from the mapping image and Fig. 1c that the prepared sample is a hollow nanosphere structure. And the Cu element is evenly distributed in the hollow spherical shell.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) Scheme of Cu single atom doted HC₃N₄. (b) HAADF-STEM, HADDF, mapping image of Cu single atom HC₃N₄. (c) TEM of Cu-HC₃N₄ composite. (d) XRD patterns for C₃N₄, HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ composite.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Fig. 1d shows the XRD patterns of HC₃N₄ with Cu single atom loadings, C₃N₄ and HC₃N₄. For C₃N₄, a very distinct XRD diffraction peak situated at 27.7°, which is attributed to the interlayer stacked reflectance of the conjugated aromatic hydrocarbon system [5]. The signature peak at 2θ is the typical (002) peak to indicate the graphite material [40]. Otherwise, for HC₃N₄, the peak with intensity slightly higher than the noise appears at 2θ of 13.3°, showing an in-plane repeated structural unit of tri-s-triazine. It can be seen that compared with C₃N₄, hollow g-C₃N₄ nanospheres have a less porous and layered structure. Compared with the former two, there is almost no (100) peak in Cu-HC₃N₄, which proves that the aromatic structure is destroyed [9]. Fig. S3 (Supporting information) gives the FTIR spectroscopy to clarify the structural composition of the synthesized photocatalyst. It is obvious that all the synthesized photocatalysts display the analogous FT-IR signals. Specifically, the characteristic peak loaded at 813 cm⁻¹ represents the condensed heptazine heterocyclic ring (C₆N₇). The peaks at 1545 cm⁻¹, 1328 cm⁻¹, and 1232 cm⁻¹ correspond to C=N(sp²), C—N(sp²) in the heptazine unit and the C—NH—C bond in melamine, respectively, which prove the composition of the basic heptazine unit of g-C₃N₄ [41-45]. The pronounced broad spectral band is in the range of 3000–3800 cm⁻¹, which is mainly due to the N—H band formed by the uncondensed amine group and the ·OH formed by the adsorption of H₂O on the surface [5].

  X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was used to determine the valence structure and coordination environment of Cu in the synthesized Cu-HC₃N₄ sample. As displayed in Fig. 2a, the absorption edge of the Cu-HC₃N₄ sample is located between the absorption edges of CuO and Cu₂O (Cu K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure spectrum, XANES), demonstrating the presence of Cu⁺ (the predominant oxidation state) and Cu²⁺ in Cu-HC₃N₄ [20,31]. The absorption edge of the Cu-HC₃N₄ migrated to a higher energy than that of Cu foil, indicating that Cu is oxidized in Cu-HC₃N₄ [26]. The FT value of the EXAFS results at the Cu K edge shows that a distinct symmetrical peak of the Cu foil at ≈2.2 Å is attributed to the Cu-Cu bond (Fig. 2b), which is not found in Cu-HC₃N₄. On the contrary, a very obvious peak appears at ≈1.4 Å, which is attributed to the Cu-N bond. The chemical structure of the Cu-HC₃N₄ sample was further determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Fig. 2c presents the survey XPS spectra of all synthesized material, and it is detected that the material has two characteristic peaks of C and N elements. It is worth noting that a slight or negligible Cu signal is present in Cu-HC₃N₄ material, proving that the Cu element content in the sample is low. Two significant characteristic peaks of 284.8 and 288.3 eV appeared in the C 1s high-resolution XPS spectrum (Fig. 2d), indicating the presence of C—C and sp² bond carbon (N—C=N) in the g-C₃N₄ skeleton, respectively [9]. The high-resolution spectrum of N 1s shows characteristic peaks at 401.3, 400.2, and 398.6 eV in the g-C₃N₄ sample (Fig. 2e), corresponding to graphical nitrogen, pyrrole nitrogen, and pyridine nitrogen, respectively [9]. Not surprisingly, the N 1s binding energy of Cu-HC₃N₄ is slightly higher than that of C₃N₄, indicating the slight decrease in the electron density of the pyridine N atom, which is attributed to its interaction with the Cu atom. Hence, the Cu atom is immobilized on the pyridine N atom in g-C₃N₄ to form a stable structure. For Cu-HC₃N₄, in the Cu 2p high-resolution spectrum, in addition to containing Cu⁺, it also shows two characteristic peaks of Cu²⁺ corresponding to 935.0 and 955.0 eV, and the ratio of Cu²⁺ to Cu⁺ is ~2 (Fig. 2f) [28]. The above results indicate the existence of single-atom copper.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) FT-EXAFS spectra. (c) XPS survey spectra and corresponding high-resolution XPS spectra of (d) C 1s, (e) N 1s and (f) Cu 2p.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The optical properties and light harvesting ability of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ were studied by UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. As presented in Fig. 3a, the UV–vis absorption edges of all samples are analyzed as follows: The absorption edge of C₃N₄ is located at 458 nm, while the HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ are red-shifted to 465 and 468 nm, respectively. In addition, all materials show tailing absorption in the visible region, which is attributed to the Cu single atom and hollow structure. The reaction of Cu atoms on the surface properties of hollow g-C₃N₄ nanospheres was investigated by N₂ adsorption tests. As shown in Fig. 3b, HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ samples express the traditional type Ⅳ isotherms and have high adsorption capacity, especially at high (P/P₀ > 0.8) relative pressure. The BET specific surface areas of HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ samples are 45.2 and 100.4 m²/g, which are 4.8 and 10.6 times that of g-C₃N₄ (9.4 m²/g), respectively. The Cu-HC₃N₄ sample with such a high specific surface area is derived from its unique hollow nanospheres morphology, which provides more active sites for utilization.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) UV–vis DRS of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄. (b) Nitrogen adsorption desorption isotherm, (c) steady-state PL spectra, (d) time-resolved PL spectra, (e) transient photocurrent responses and (f) Nyquist plots of C₃N₄, HC₃N_4, Cu-C₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As shown in Fig. 3c, a significant photoluminescence (PL) quenching occurs in the steady-state PL emission spectra of the Cu-HC₃N₄ heterostructure relative to Cu-C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, and C₃N₄, indicating the intrinsic radiative recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs in C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, and Cu-C₃N₄. It follows that the PL quenching on C₃N₄ and HC₃N₄ may be caused by the introduction of Cu atoms. In addition, compared with C₃N₄, the PL intensity of HC₃N₄ also decreases, which indicates that C₃N₄ can effectively improve the charge transport between the interface layers after surface bending via hollow structure, and effectively inhibit the carrier recombination. Furthermore, as seen in Fig. 3d and Table S4 (Supporting information), the time-resolved transient PL decay spectra by the position of the corresponding steady-state emission peaks show that the Cu-HC₃N₄ heterostructure has a longer charge carrier average lifetime (τ_avg) relative to Cu-C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, and C₃N₄, which indicates the presence of more efficient charge transfer in Cu-HC₃N₄. By using a pump pulse at 400 nm wavelength, electrons are effectively promoted from the valence band to the conduction band of g-C₃N₄. As shown by the results, a very similar TA spectrum characterized by the detection of bleaching signals appears in the detection range of 450–760 nm wavelengths. A global fitting procedure to retrieve the characteristic relaxation time constants was performed to eliminate the avoidable effects of different probe wavelengths on the recovery kinetics. The average time constants for C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, Cu-C₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄ are 112, 93, 86, and 68 ps, respectively, as shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information). The fit results converge to a long-lived plateau with a certain amplitude, which reflects the longer lifetime of the charge recombination process on the nano-microsecond time scale. And the average recovery lifetime is an obvious indicator to assess the separation/transfer efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers. By comparing the average recovery lifetime cases of HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄, a decrease can be observed. This may be due to the fact that Cu-N₃ opens an additional in-plane channel for electron transfer which shortens the average recovery lifetime. There is also a decrease in the average recovery lifetime of Cu-HC₃N₄ compared to Cu-C₃N₄, which may be due to the hollow nanosphere structure opening an additional interlayer channel for electron transfer.

  Furthermore, chrono-measured I-t curves under chopper illumination conditions were used to characterize the photo-response of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, Cu-C₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄ catalysts. As shown in Fig. 3e, the Cu-HC₃N₄ catalyst has a higher photocurrent value relative to the pristine HC₃N₄ and Cu-C₃N₄, indicating that the Cu -HC₃N₄ catalyst has a higher electron-hole separation efficiency. A rapid improvement in charge transfer capability was also confirmed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The small arc radius of the Nyquist plot of the Cu-HC₃N₄ electrode was used to characterize the rapid interfacial charge transfer between Cu-HC₃N₄ and the dielectric (Fig. 3f). The results shown above further demonstrate that the hollow structure has the positive effect of promoting the separation of photogenerated carriers within the face and between the layers, thereby also improving the performance of single-atom Cu-HC₃N₄ photocatalysts.

  The photocatalytic hydrogen evolution experiments were implemented by using methanol as an electron donor and platinum as a co-catalyst under visible light (λ > 420 nm) irradiation. Hydrogen evolution rates were about 20 µmol/h for C₃N₄, 68 µmol/h for HC₃N₄, 378 µmol/h for Cu-C₃N₄, and 1020 µmol/h for Cu-HC₃N₄ (Figs. 4a and b). Cu-HC₃N₄ has a relatively good activity as a good performing photocatalyst over a longer period of time (Fig. 4c). It is because of the high planar and interlayer conductivity generated by Cu-N₃ and hollow nanostructures, which allow rapid migration of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and inhibit charge recombination, the photocatalytic activity of Cu-HC₃N₄ is higher than that of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄ and Cu-C₃N₄. Besides, the effect of the number of Cu single atoms on the product hydrogen evolution can also be seen by Fig. S5 (Supporting information), where the loading of Cu should not exceed 0.50 wt%, otherwise there is a significant decrease in activity, which is due to the aggregation of copper atoms making the utilization of copper atoms less efficient.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  (a) Average hydrogen production rates and (b) H₂ evolution under visible light irradiation. (c) Cycling tests of photocatalytic hydrogen generation of Cu-HC₃N₄. (d) Photocatalytic TC degradation. (e) Cycling tests of photocatalytic TC degradation of Cu-HC₃N₄. (f) The effects of scavengers on the photocatalytic TC degradation (catalysts = 50 mg, scavenger = 10 mmol/L).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As shown in Fig. 4d, the photocatalytic performance of the Cu-HC₃N₄ sample was verified by tetracycline (TC) photocatalytic degradation in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation, where the photoelectrons generated by the photocatalyst were transferred to copper ions for efficient copper cycling, enabling the continuation of the reaction. In addition to this, the holes generated by light can also produce certain radicals. Therefore, single-atom copper and hollow structure modified photocatalytic materials can generate free radicals better due to their higher charge separation properties. Under dark conditions, the adsorption of the model pollutant TC on the surfaces of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, Cu-C₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ after 10 min was not different compared to the results of BET. Under visible light irradiation, the absorption intensity of TC decreases with time, indicating the appearance of photo-oxidation of TC, and suggesting that Cu-HC₃N₄ has the best photocatalytic degradation, which is caused by the combined effect of the unitary copper and hollow nanosphere structure. The total organic carbon removal rate is displayed in Fig. S6 (Supporting information), and the results indicate that the removal of organic carbon is similar to the degradation outcomes, with Cu-HC₃N₄ exhibiting the highest removal rate. This suggests that it has superior photocatalytic degradation performance.

  The stable photocatalytic performance of Cu-HC₃N₄ was demonstrated by stability testing (Fig. 4e), proving the successful preparation of a single-atom photocatalyst with excellent performance. XRD and FTIR tests were performed for the samples recovered after the test (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). As shown in Fig. S7b, there was no significant change in the spectra before and after the tests, which further verified that the photocatalyst has good stability. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 4f, it can be seen that BQ has the greatest impact on performance, indicating that ^•O₂⁻ is the main reactive oxygen species. As benzene is an important reagent for the synthesis of many chemicals, the photocatalytic oxidation activity of Cu-HC₃N₄ can be tested by whether it can selectively oxidize benzene to phenol, and the conversion of benzene to phenol cannot occur in the absence of the catalyst (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). Compared to C₃N₄, HC₃N₄ and Cu-C₃N₄, the conversion and selectivity of Cu-HC₃N₄ were improved to 97.3% and 99.9%, respectively, under visible light conditions, providing a more excellent performance. The sample recovery was tested after the experiment (Fig. S9 in Supporting information), and Cu-HC₃N₄ also has good stability for phenol production, as evidenced by hydrogen evolution and TC degradation experiments.

  In general, the photocatalytic process involves several steps: First, light is absorbed by the prepared Cu-C₃N₄ photocatalyst, generating an excited state called an electron-hole pair. Second, the electron and hole are separated and migrate to a reaction site on the photocatalyst surface, where the hollow sphere structure and Cu single atoms can effectively promote the separation of photogenerated charge carriers (Fig. S10 in Supporting information). Third, the reactant molecules or ions adsorb onto the photocatalyst surface, and the larger specific surface area of the hollow sphere structure can increase the adsorption of reactant molecules. Fourth, the electrons on the photocatalyst surface react with the adsorbed reactant molecules or ions, causing them to undergo redox reactions. Fifth, the products of the redox reactions desorb from the photocatalyst surface, completing the photocatalysis process.

  In summary, we propose a simple pre-assembly strategy to prepare porous and hollow nanospheres g-C₃N₄ photocatalysts with unique Cu-N₃ species and high active site accessibility. Interestingly, compared with HC₃N₄ and Cu-C₃N₄, the developed Cu-HC₃N₄ catalyst exhibits excellent photocatalytic performance, especially in the photocatalytic degradation of TC and the selective oxidation of benzene to phenol. The atomically dispersed, anchored peculiar Cu−N₃ species is responsible for the prominent catalytic behavior. This study not only affords a neoteric and highly active catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen production, but also provides a new way to design and fabricate single-atom catalysts in various g-C₃N₄ micro/nanostructures by changing the metal and/or adjusting the structure of pre-organized supramolecular aggregates.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was supported by the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (No. ZDYF2022SHFZ094), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22166016), Hainan Provincial Key Research and Development Program (No. ZDYF2020222), and the open-ended fund of Key Laboratory of Agro-Forestry Environmental Processes and Ecological Regulation of Hainan Province (No. AFEPER202205).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108568.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     Y. Chen, S. Lan, M. Zhu, Chin. Chem. Lett., 32 (2021) 2052–2056. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.016

  2. [2]

     S. He, M. Shen, E. Wu, et al., Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 9 (2022) 100141. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2021.100141

  3. [3]

     Y. Long, H. Xu, J. He, C. Li, M. Zhu, Surf. Interfaces 31 (2022) 102056. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102056

  4. [4]

     X. Wang, H. Jiang, M. Zhu, X. Shi, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107683. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.026

  5. [5]

     D. Zhao, Y. Wang, C.L. Dong, et al., Nat. Energy 6 (2021) 388–397. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00795-9

  6. [6]

     C. Hu, J. Hu, Z. Zhu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202212397. doi: 10.1002/anie.202212397

  7. [7]

     Y. Li, H. Wang, X. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 12891–12896. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101090

  8. [8]

     Q. Liu, J. Huang, L. Wang, et al., Sol. RRL 5 (2021) 2000504. doi: 10.1002/solr.202000504

  9. [9]

     T. Zhao, D. Li, Y. Zhang, G. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 628 (2022) 966–974. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.008

  10. [10]

      X. Zhao, Y. Fan, W. Zhang, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 6367–6376. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01033

  11. [11]

      X. Zhao, Y. You, S. Huang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 278 (2020) 119251. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119251

  12. [12]

      L. Zhou, Z. Liu, Z. Guan, et al., Appl. Catal. B 263 (2020) 118326. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118326

  13. [13]

      Y. Geng, D. Chen, N. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B 280 (2021) 119409. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119409

  14. [14]

      Q. Zhang, Y. Peng, Y. Lin, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 405 (2021) 126661. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126661

  15. [15]

      L. Hu, J. Huang, J. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 320 (2023) 121945. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121945

  16. [16]

      S. Gong, X. Teng, Y. Niu, et al., Appl. Catal. B 298 (2021) 120521. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120521

  17. [17]

      T. Zhao, Z. Xing, Z. Xiu, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 7104–7111. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b21131

  18. [18]

      Y. Xu, M. Fan, W. Yang, et al., Adv. Mater. 33 (2021) 2101455. doi: 10.1002/adma.202101455

  19. [19]

      L. Zhang, Z.Q. Wang, J. Liao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 431 (2022) 133453. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133453

  20. [20]

      X. Xiao, Y. Gao, L. Zhang, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2003082. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003082

  21. [21]

      W. Jiang, Y. Zhao, X. Zong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 6124–6129. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015779

  22. [22]

      L. Jiang, Y. Xie, F. He, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2187–2191. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.010

  23. [23]

      J. Song, M. Huang, N. Jiang, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 391 (2020) 122024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122024

  24. [24]

      Z. Wang, E. Almatrafi, H. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202202338. doi: 10.1002/anie.202202338

  25. [25]

      F. Chen, L.L. Liu, J.H. Wu, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2202891. doi: 10.1002/adma.202202891

  26. [26]

      G. Wang, Z. Chen, T. Wang, D. Wang, J. Mao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202210789. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210789

  27. [27]

      E. Zhao, M. Li, B. Xu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202207410. doi: 10.1002/anie.202207410

  28. [28]

      J. Wang, T. Heil, B. Zhu, et al., ACS Nano 14 (2020) 8584–8593. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02940

  29. [29]

      X. Sun, L. Sun, G. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202207677. doi: 10.1002/anie.202207677

  30. [30]

      B. Wu, L. Zhang, B. Jiang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 4815–4822. doi: 10.1002/anie.202013753

  31. [31]

      T. Yang, X. Mao, Y. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6022. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26316-6

  32. [32]

      Z. Lin, Y. Zhao, J. Luo, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1908797. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201908797

  33. [33]

      H.S. Moon, K.C. Hsiao, M.C. Wu, et al., Adv. Mater. 35 (2022) 2200172.

  34. [34]

      Y. Li, S. Ouyang, H. Xu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2019) 1901024. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201901024

  35. [35]

      X. Wu, X. Wang, F. Wang, H. Yu, Appl. Catal. B 247 (2019) 70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.088

  36. [36]

      Z. Lin, C. Shao, S. Jiang, C. Sun, S. Song, Appl. Catal. B 268 (2020) 118742. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118742

  37. [37]

      J. Luo, Z. Lin, Y. Zhao, S. Jiang, S. Song, Chin. J. Catal. 41 (2020) 122–130. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63490-X

  38. [38]

      L. Zhang, W. Sun, C. Ge, J. Liao, Sol. RRL 5 (2021) 2000639. doi: 10.1002/solr.202000639

  39. [39]

      Z. Tong, D. Yang, Z. Li, et al., ACS Nano 11 (2017) 1103–1112. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08251

  40. [40]

      C. Huang, Y. Wen, J. Ma, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 320. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20521-5

  41. [41]

      Y. Huang, K. Wang, T. Guo, et al., Appl. Catal. B 277 (2020) 119232. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119232

  42. [42]

      X. Hu, W. Zhang, Y. Yong, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 510 (2020) 145413. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145413

  43. [43]

      Y. Liu, J. Li, B. Zhou, et al., Environ. Chem. Lett. 7 (2009) 363–368. doi: 10.1007/s10311-008-0180-z

  44. [44]

      R. Wang, S. Zhang, H. Chen, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 4050–4059. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c07073

  45. [45]

      M. Du, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 298 (2022) 121585. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121585

• 

  Figure 1  (a) Scheme of Cu single atom doted HC₃N₄. (b) HAADF-STEM, HADDF, mapping image of Cu single atom HC₃N₄. (c) TEM of Cu-HC₃N₄ composite. (d) XRD patterns for C₃N₄, HC₃N₄ and Cu-HC₃N₄ composite.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) FT-EXAFS spectra. (c) XPS survey spectra and corresponding high-resolution XPS spectra of (d) C 1s, (e) N 1s and (f) Cu 2p.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) UV–vis DRS of C₃N₄, HC₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄. (b) Nitrogen adsorption desorption isotherm, (c) steady-state PL spectra, (d) time-resolved PL spectra, (e) transient photocurrent responses and (f) Nyquist plots of C₃N₄, HC₃N_4, Cu-C₃N₄, and Cu-HC₃N₄.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  (a) Average hydrogen production rates and (b) H₂ evolution under visible light irradiation. (c) Cycling tests of photocatalytic hydrogen generation of Cu-HC₃N₄. (d) Photocatalytic TC degradation. (e) Cycling tests of photocatalytic TC degradation of Cu-HC₃N₄. (f) The effects of scavengers on the photocatalytic TC degradation (catalysts = 50 mg, scavenger = 10 mmol/L).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•