钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展

引用本文: 戚洺瑄, 金斓煜, 姚宏鹤, 徐子鹏, 成腾, 陈棋, 朱城, 白阳. 钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100088. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100088 shu

Citation: Mingxuan Qi, Lanyu Jin, Honghe Yao, Zipeng Xu, Teng Cheng, Qi Chen, Cheng Zhu, Yang Bai. Recent progress on electrical failure and stability of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(8): 100088. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100088 shu

钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展

北京理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 先进材料实验中心, 北京 100081

通讯作者: 朱城, zc@bit.edu.cn; 白阳, mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn

基金项目:
国家自然科学基金 52473272

摘要: 卤化物钙钛矿凭借其优异的光电特性和独特的缺陷容忍特性，在光伏领域展现出巨大的应用潜力，其单结太阳能电池的认证效率已突破26.95%。然而，钙钛矿材料中的离子键键能较弱，使其在电场作用下易发生离子迁移，导致器件在反向电偏压加载下呈现显著的电学不稳定性，严重阻碍了其商业化进程。特别是在大面积组件应用中，局部遮光效应会使被遮挡的子电池成为电阻，在相邻子电池驱动下被迫承受反向偏压，进而引发材料的结构降解和器件性能的急剧衰减。本文系统综述了钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的失效机制，全面梳理了反向偏压稳定性的最新研究进展，重点剖析了反向击穿电压阈值与其电学演化规律，深入探讨了器件老化行为的诱因及稳定性提升策略，并评述了相关原位表征技术的应用进展。最后，本文进一步提出了通过机器学习辅助逆向设计材料体系、构建动态载流子输运模型等创新性解决方案，为攻克反向偏压稳定性这一关键科学难题提供了新的研究思路。

关键词:

English

Recent progress on electrical failure and stability of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias

Experimental Centre for Advanced Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Corresponding author: Email: zc@bit.edu.cn (C.Z.); Email: mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn (Y.B.)

Received Date: 07 February 2025
Accepted Date: 03 April 2025
Revised Date: 21 March 2025
Available Online: 15 August 2025
Fund Project:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Abstract: Halide perovskites have attracted widespread attention in the photovoltaic field due to their exception optoelectronic properties and remarkable defect tolerance. The power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells has rapidly increased, reaching 26.95%. However, the weak ionic bonding in perovskite materials make them highly sensitive to electric fields, leading to instability under reverse bias, which poses a significant challenge to their commercialization. During operation, partial shading of modules can cause the shaded perovskite sub-cells to become resistive. Consequently, under the influence of other sub-cells, these shaded sub-cells experience reverse bias, resulting in a substantial decline in device performance. Currently, there is no characterization technique available to directly investigate the failure mechanisms of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias. Furthermore, there is no consensus in existing research on the types of ion migration occurring within devices during reverse bias ageing. Since the failure mechanisms of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias remain unclear, effective stability strategies targeting these mechanisms have not been proposed. As a result, reverse bias instability continues to hinder the long-term operational stability of perovskite solar cells. Given these challenges, a comprehensive review of the electrical failure and degradation mechanisms of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias is imperative. This review summarizes the latest research progress on the reverse bias stability of perovskite solar cells, covering key aspects such as the maximum breakdown voltage, electrical evolution, ageing behavior, degradation mechanisms, stability enhancement strategies, and characterization techniques used in stability studies. Finally, this review highlights future research directions for investigating the ageing mechanisms of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias and proposes potential approaches, such as machine learning, to address the reverse bias stability issues of high-efficiency perovskite solar cells, in the hope of paving the way for further improving their reverse bias stability.

Key words:

1. [1]
  https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. (Accessed 10 March 2025).
2. [2]
  F.Y. Lin, Y. Yang, C.T. Zhu, T. Chen, S.P. Ma, Y. Luo, L. Zhu, X.Y. Guo, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 38 (2022) 24, https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005007. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005007
3. [3]
  Y. Lu, Y. Ge, M.L. Sui, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 38 (2022) 76, https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007088. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007088
4. [4]
  L. Shi, M.P. Bucknall, T.L. Young, M. Zhang, L. Hu, J. Bing, D.S. Lee, J. Kim, T. Wu, N. Takamure, D.R. McKenzie, S. Huang, M.A. Green, A.W.Y. Ho-Baillie, Science 368 (6497) (2020) eaba2412, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2412. doi: 10.1126/science.aba2412
5. [5]
  J. Tang, S. Ma, Y. Wu, F. Pei, Y. Ma, G. Yuan, Z. Zhang, H. Zhou, C. Zhu, Y. Jiang, Y. Li, Q. Chen, Sol. RRL 8 (2) (2024) 2300801, https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300801. doi: 10.1002/solr.202300801
6. [6]
  F. Bella, G. Griffini, J.-P. Correa-Baena, G. Saracco, M. Gr€atzel, A. Hagfeldt, S. Turri, C. Gerbaldi, Science 354 (6309) (2016) 203, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4046. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4046
7. [7]
  Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Lan, Q. Song, M. Li, Y. Song, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (16) (2021) 8673, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202100218. doi: 10.1002/anie.202100218
8. [8]
  B.Y. Zhang, C. Yang, W.F. Liu, A.M. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 (9) (2012) 93903, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4749821. doi: 10.1063/1.4749821
9. [9]
  N. Klasen, F. Lux, J. Weber, T. Roessler, A. Kraft, IEEE J. Photovoltaics 12 (2) (2022) 546, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3144635. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3144635
10. [10]
  Y. Jia, Y. Wang, X. Hu, J. Xu, G. Weng, X. Luo, S. Chen, Z. Zhu, H. Akiyama, Sol. Energy 225 (2021) 463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.052. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.052
11. [11]
  Farella, G. Montagna, A.M. Mancini, A. Cola, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56 (4) (2009) 1736, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2009.2017020. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2009.2017020
12. [12]
  D. Shvydka, V.G. Karpov, A.D. Compaan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (17) (2002) 3114, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1475359. doi: 10.1063/1.1475359
13. [13]
  J.V. Li, A.F. Halverson, O.V. Sulima, S. Bansal, J.M. Burst, T.M. Barnes, T.A. Gessert, D.H. Levi, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cell. 100 (2012) 126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.01.003. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.01.003
14. [14]
  Agresti, S. Pescetelli, E. Gatto, M. Venanzi, A. Di Carlo, J. Power Sources 287 (2015) 87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.038. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.038
15. [15]
  S. Mastroianni, A. Lembo, T.M. Brown, A. Reale, A. Di Carlo, ChemPhysChem 13 (12) (2012) 2964, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200229. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201200229
16. [16]
  S. Mastroianni, A. Lanuti, T.M. Brown, R. Argazzi, S. Caramori, A. Reale, A. Di Carlo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 (12) (2012) 123302, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4754116. doi: 10.1063/1.4754116
17. [17]
  E. Palmiotti, S. Johnston, A. Gerber, H. Guthrey, A. Rockett, L. Mansfield, T.J. Silverman, M. Al-Jassim, Sol. Energy 161 (2018) 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.019. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.019
18. [18]
  H. Guthrey, M. Nardone, S. Johnston, J. Liu, A. Norman, J. Moseley, M. Al-Jassim, Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 27 (9) (2019) 812, https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3168. doi: 10.1002/pip.3168
19. [19]
  K. Bakker, H.N. Åhman, T. Burgers, N. Barreau, A. Weeber, M. Theelen, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cell. 205 (2020) 110249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110249. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110249
20. [20]
  C. Wehrenfennig, G.E. Eperon, M.B. Johnston, H.J. Snaith, L.M. Herz, Adv. Mater. 26 (10) (2014) 1584, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305172. doi: 10.1002/adma.201305172
21. [21]
  Y. Zhao, C. Liang, H. Zhang, D. Li, D. Tian, G. Li, X. Jing, W. Zhang, W. Xiao, Q. Liu, F. Zhang, Z. He, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (4) (2015) 1256, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE04064C. doi: 10.1039/C4EE04064C
22. [22]
  H. Wu, C. Xu, Z. Zhang, Z. Xiong, M. Shi, S. Ma, W. Fan, Z. Zhang, Q. Liao, Z. Kang, Y. Zhang, Nano Lett. 22 (4) (2022) 1467, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03336. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03336
23. [23]
  R.A.Z. Razera, D.A. Jacobs, F. Fu, P. Fiala, M. Dussouillez, F. Sahli, T.C.J. Yang, L. Ding, A. Walter, A.F. Feil, H.I. Boudinov, S. Nicolay, C. Ballif, Q. Jeangros, J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (1) (2020) 242, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA12032G. doi: 10.1039/C9TA12032G
24. [24]
  N. Li, Z. Shi, C. Fei, H. Jiao, M. Li, H. Gu, S.P. Harvey, Y. Dong, M.C. Beard, J. Huang, Nat. Energy 9 (10) (2024) 1264, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01579-7. doi: 10.1038/s41560-024-01579-7
25. [25]
  M. Diethelm, T. Lukas, J. Smith, A. Dasgupta, P. Caprioglio, M. Futscher, R. Hany, H.J. Snaith, Energy Environ. Sci. 18 (2025) 1385, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE02494J. doi: 10.1039/D4EE02494J
26. [26]
  H. Bi, M. Wang, L. Liu, J. Yan, R. Zeng, Z. Xu, J. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A 12 (2024) 12744, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TA07457A. doi: 10.1039/D3TA07457A
27. [27]
  Q. Jeangros, M. Duchamp, J. Werner, M. Kruth, R.E. Dunin-Borkowski, B. Niesen, C. Ballif, A. Hessler-Wyser, Nano Lett. 16 (11) (2016) 7013, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03158. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03158
28. [28]
  Z. Xu, R.A. Kerner, S.P. Harvey, K. Zhu, J.J. Berry, B.P. Rand, ACS Energy Lett. 8 (1) (2023) 513, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02385. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02385
29. [29]
  D. Bogachuk, K. Saddedine, D. Martineau, S. Narbey, A. Verma, P. Gebhardt, J.P. Herterich, N. Glissmann, S. Zouhair, J. Markert, I.E. Gould, M.D. McGehee, U. Würfel, A. Hinsch, L. Wagner, Sol. RRL 6 (3) (2022) 2100527, https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202100527. doi: 10.1002/solr.202100527
30. [30]
  C. Jiang, J. Zhou, H. Li, L. Tan, M. Li, W. Tress, L. Ding, M. Gr€atzel, C. Yi, NanoMicro Lett. 15 (1) (2022) 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00985-4. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00985-4
31. [31]
  T. Tayagaki, H. Kobayashi, K. Yamamoto, T.N. Murakami, M. Yoshita, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 279 (2025) 113229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113229. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113229
32. [32]
  W. Li, K. Huang, J. Chang, C. Hu, C. Long, H. Zhang, X. Maldague, B. Liu, J. Meng, Y. Duan, J. Yang, ChemPhysMater 1 (1) (2022) 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphma.2021.10.001. doi: 10.1016/j.chphma.2021.10.001
33. [33]
  Rajagopal, S.T. Williams, C.-C. Chueh, A.K.-Y. Jen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (6) (2016) 995, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00058. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00058
34. [34]
  Wang, L. Huang, Y. Guo, S. Liu, J. Huang, X. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. Hu, K. Liu, Y. Zhu, Sol. RRL 7 (20) (2023) 2300456, https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300456. doi: 10.1002/solr.202300456
35. [35]
  W. Tress, J.P. Correa Baena, M. Saliba, A. Abate, M. Graetzel, Adv. Energy Mater. 6 (19) (2016) 1600396, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600396. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600396
36. [36]
  Z. Ni, H. Jiao, C. Fei, H. Gu, S. Xu, Z. Yu, G. Yang, Y. Deng, Q. Jiang, Y. Liu, Y. Yan, J. Huang, Nat. Energy 7 (1) (2022) 65, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00949-9. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00949-9
37. [37]
  X. Guo, N. Li, Y. Xu, J. Zhao, F. Cui, Y. Chen, X. Du, Q. Song, G. Zhang, X. Cheng, X. Tao, Z. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (22) (2023) 2213995, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202213995. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202213995
38. [38]
  X. Ren, J. Wang, Y. Lin, Y. Wang, H. Xie, H. Huang, B. Yang, Y. Yan, Y. Gao, J. He, J. Huang, Y. Yuan, Nat. Mater. 23 (6) (2024) 810, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-024-01876-2. doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-01876-2
39. [39]
  F. Jiang, Y. Shi, T.R. Rana, D. Morales, I.E. Gould, D.P. McCarthy, J.A. Smith, M.G. Christoforo, M.Y. Yaman, F. Mandani, T. Terlier, H. Contreras, S. Barlow, A.D. Mohite, H.J. Snaith, S.R. Marder, J.D. MacKenzie, M.D. McGehee, D.S. Ginger, Nat. Energy 9 (10) (2024) 1275, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01600-z. doi: 10.1038/s41560-024-01600-z
40. [40]
  A.R. Bowring, L. Bertoluzzi, B.C. O'Regan, M.D. McGehee, Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (8) (2018) 1702365, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702365. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702365
41. [41]
  Breitenstein, J. Bauer, K. Bothe, W. Kwapil, D. Lausch, U. Rau, J. Schmidt, M. Schneemann, M.C. Schubert, J.-M. Wagner, W. Warta, J. Appl. Phys. 109 (7) (2011) 71101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3562200. doi: 10.1063/1.3562200
42. [42]
  M. Singh Tyagi, Solid State Electron. 11 (1) (1968) 99, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(68)90141-X. doi: 10.1016/0038-1101(68)90141-X
43. [43]
  L. Bertoluzzi, J.B. Patel, K.A. Bush, C.C. Boyd, R.A. Kerner, B.C. O'Regan, M.D.McGehee, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (10) (2021) 2002614, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002614. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002614
44. [44]
  T.S. Vaas, B.E. Pieters, A. Gerber, U. Rau, IEEE J. Photovoltaics 13 (3) (2023) 398, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3240680. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3240680
45. [45]
  C. Eames, J.M. Frost, P.R.F. Barnes, B.C. O'Regan, A. Walsh, M.S. Islam, Nat. Commun. 6 (1) (2015) 7497, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8497. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8497
46. [46]
  K. Huang, X. Feng, H. Li, C. Long, B. Liu, J. Shi, Q. Meng, K. Weber, T. Duong, J. Yang, Adv. Sci. 9 (35) (2022) 2204163, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202204163. doi: 10.1002/advs.202204163
47. [47]
  J. Zhang, X. Niu, C. Peng, H. Jiang, L. Yu, H. Zhou, Z. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 62 (50) (2023) e202314106, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202314106. doi: 10.1002/anie.202314106
48. [48]
  P. Teng, S. Reichert, W. Xu, S.-C. Yang, F. Fu, Y. Zou, C. Yin, C. Bao, M. Karlsson, X. Liu, J. Qin, T. Yu, W. Tress, Y. Yang, B. Sun, C. Deibel, F. Gao, Matter 4 (11) (2021) 3710, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.09.007. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.09.007
49. [49]
  Y. Cheng, X. Liu, Z. Guan, M. Li, Z. Zeng, H. Li, S. Tsang, A.G. Aberle, F. Lin, Adv. Mater. 33 (3) (2021) 2006170, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006170. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006170
50. [50]
  D. Kim, J.S. Yun, P. Sharma, D.S. Lee, J. Kim, A.M. Soufiani, S. Huang, M.A. Green, A.W.Y. Ho-Baillie, J. Seidel, Nat. Commun. 10 (1) (2019) 444, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08364-1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08364-1
51. [51]
  M. Kot, C. Das, Z. Wang, K. Henkel, Z. Rouissi, K. Wojciechowski, H.J. Snaith, D. Schmeisser, ChemSusChem 9 (24) (2016) 3401, https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201601186. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201601186
52. [52]
  L. Zhou, X. Guo, Z. Lin, J. Ma, J. Su, Z. Hu, C. Zhang, S. Liu, (Frank), J. Chang, Y. Hao, Nano Energy 60 (2019) 583, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.081. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.081
53. [53]
  Z. Yin, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Yuan, Q. Yang, Y. Zhong, X. Gao, J. Xiao, Z. Wang, J. Xu, S. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (33) (2023) 2302199, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202302199. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202302199
54. [54]
  L. Najafi, S. Bellani, L. Gabatel, M.I. Zappia, A. Di Carlo, F. Bonaccorso, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5 (2) (2022) 1378, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c03206. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03206
55. [55]
  Z. Xu, H. Bristow, M. Babics, B. Vishal, E. Aydin, R. Azmi, E. Ugur, B.K. Yildirim, J. Liu, R.A. Kerner, S. De Wolf, B.P. Rand, Joule 7 (9) (2023) 1992, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.017. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.017

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 6
文章访问数: 1596
HTML全文浏览量: 208

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展

通讯作者: 朱城, zc@bit.edu.cn; 白阳, mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn

English

Recent progress on electrical failure and stability of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias

Corresponding author: Email: zc@bit.edu.cn (C.Z.); Email: mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn (Y.B.)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展

通讯作者: 朱城, zc@bit.edu.cn; 白阳, mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn

English

Recent progress on electrical failure and stability of perovskite solar cells under reverse bias

Corresponding author: Email: zc@bit.edu.cn (C.Z.); Email: mse.ybai@bit.edu.cn (Y.B.)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs