Citation: Zhendong Wang, Magdalena O. Cichocka, Yi Luo, Bin Zhang, Hongmin Sun, Yi Tang, Weimin Yang. Controllable direct-syntheses of delaminated MWW-type zeolites[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(7): 1062-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63545-8
层剥离MWW结构分子筛的直接可控合成
X射线衍射(XRD)结果表明,与MCM-22分子筛相比,在二环己基胺参与下合成的分子筛SCM-1(DCHA/SiO2=0.4)和SCM-6(DCHA/SiO2=0.6)的XRD谱中与MWW结构c轴方向有关的(101)和(102)晶面的衍射峰出现偏移和重叠的现象,表明其沿c轴方向有序性降低.扫描电子显微镜显示,所有样品均为片状形貌,其中SCM-6含有少量无定形物种.氩气及氮气物理吸附结果表明,SCM-1和SCM-6具有超大外比表面积,而微孔体积小于MCM-22分子筛.透射电子显微镜表征结果表明,MCM-22为多层结构,厚度约为20 nm,而SCM-1和SCM-6的厚度分别约为5.0和2.5 nm,对应双层和单层结构,表明在有机添加剂参与下直接合成了层剥离的新型MWW结构分子筛.值得注意的是,通过调节添加剂用量,可以调节剥离程度,即实现可控层剥离,得到完全(单层)或部分(双层)剥离的MWW结构分子筛.该方法所采用的添加剂的尺寸是关键因素,选用尺寸大于有机结构导向剂的添加剂才能有效抑制晶体沿c轴方向的有序生长,实现层剥离MWW结构分子筛的直接合成.
采用该方法合成的新型MWW结构分子筛具有超大外比表面积和更多的表面半超笼,在苯与乙烯液相烷基化反应中,SCM-1催化的乙烯转化率明显高于MCM-22分子筛.SCM-6因结晶度低而未能表现出优势.进一步比较SCM-1和MCM-22的催化稳定性发现,SCM-1的稳定性更好,经过64 h连续反应,其吸附的有机物及积碳更少.在1,3,5-三异丙苯裂解反应中,SCM-1的催化性能也明显优于MCM-22.
English
Controllable direct-syntheses of delaminated MWW-type zeolites
-
Key words:
- Zeolite
- / MWW
- / Alkylation
- / Ethylbenzene
- / Delamination
- / Catalysis
-
-
[1] J. Shi, Y. Wang, W. Yang, Y. Tang, Z. Xie, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 8877-8903.
-
[2] http://asia.iza-structure.org/IZA-SC/ftc_table.php
-
[3] W. Vermeiren J. P. Gilson, Top. Catal., 2009, 52, 1131-1161.
-
[4] M. E. Leonowicz, J. A. Lawton, S. L. Lawton, M. K. Rubin, Science, 1994, 264, 1910-1913.
-
[5] W. Yang, Z. Wang, H. Sun, B. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 16-26.
-
[6] H. Du, D. H. Olson, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 395-400.
-
[7] Y. Du, C. Wang, G. Yang, W. Yang, Chin. J. Chem., 2019, DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.201900345.
-
[8] A. Corma, V. Fornes, S. B. Pergher, T. L. M. Maesen, J. G. Buglass, Nature, 1998, 396, 353-356.
-
[9] M. Choi, K. Na, J. Kim, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki, R. Ryoo, Nature, 2009, 461, 246-249.
-
[10] H. Y. Luo, V. K. Michaelis, S. Hodges, R. G. Griffin, Y. Román-Leshkov, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 6320-6324.
-
[11] L. Xu, X. Ji, S. Li, Z. Zhou, X. Du, J. Sun, F. Deng, S. Che, P. Wu, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 4512-4521.
-
[12] V. J. Margarit, M. E. Martínez-Armero, M. T. Navarro, C. Martínez, A. Corma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 13724-13728.
-
[13] J. Grzybek, W. J. Roth, B. Gil, A. Korzeniowska, M. Mazur, J. Čejka, R. E. Morris, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 7701-7709.
-
[14] S. L. Lawton, A. S. Fung, G. J. Kennedy, L. B. Alemany, C. D. Chang, G. H. Hatzikos, D. N. Lissy, M. K. Rubin, H.-K. C. Timken, S. Steuernagel, D. E. Woessner, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 3788-3798.
-
[15] W. Chu, X. Li, S. Liu, X. Zhu, S. Xie, F. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Xin, L. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 12244-12249.
-
[16] Y. Kamimura, K. Itabashi, Y. Kon, A. Endo, T. Okubo, Chem. Asian J., 2017, 12, 530-542.
-
[17] P. Wu, J. Ruan, L. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Fan, M. He, O. Terasaki, T. Tatsumi, J. Am. Soc. Chem., 2008, 130, 8178-8187.
-
[18] L. Liu, U. Díaz, R. Arenal, G. Agostini, P. Concepción, A. Corma, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 132-138.
-
[19] X. Ouyang, S.-J. Hwang, R. C. Runnebaum, D. Xie, Y.-J. Wanglee, T. Rea, S. I. Zones, A. Katz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1449-1461.
-
[20] A. Fung, S. Lawton, W. J. Roth, US Patent 5362697, 1994.
-
-
扫一扫看文章
计量
- PDF下载量: 4
- 文章访问数: 918
- HTML全文浏览量: 98

下载: