English

• 0.   Introduction

  Recently, the rational design and construction of microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have obtained extensive attention on account of their fascinating topologies and potential applications in optical, gas storage and separation, biomimetic materials, catalysis and so on^[1-4]. In particular, the assembly of MOFs showing topological complexity, aesthetic beauty, and structural integrity, especially of those with undiscovered intriguing topologies has been appealing to more and more chemists^[5-8]. The controll-able syntheses of MOFs are still difficult in the most of metal-organic ligands systems due to the fact that the assembly processes are complicated and influenced by many inner and outer factors^[9-11]. Generally, the resulting framework of the MOFs depends on the structural characteristics of organic ligands, the coor-dination modes of metal center ions, experiment condition and the reaction pathways and so on^[12-16]. In many case, metal ions can regulated the structure dramatically, which give rise to some ion-directed coordination systems. The selection of metal centers can tune the structure through their various coordination geometries^[17-20].

  In additional, dyes removal from contaminated water attracts the interests of the majority of researchers^[21-24]. However, quickly removing the dyes from waste-water is still a challenge. Compared with absorption method, photocatalysis is one of the most effective chemical methods to alleviate the environ-ment issue by converting inexhaustible solar energy into clean chemical substances^[25-27]. Thus, the design strategy and improvement approaches for MOF-based photocatalytic activities are commendable^[29-30]. It has reported that the feasible strategy of photocatalytic process is to facilitate the generation of free radical as electron acceptors to the photocatalytic reaction^[31-32]. In this regard, unsaturated metal sites which could reduce charge carrier recombination probability may accelerate the generation of free radical and further degrade dye quickly. In the current study, a functional ligand with multiple coordination modes has been used as organic ligand to constructed two novel MOFs. Interestingly, their structural diversity is largely dependent on the changes of metal ions. And the two MOFs both exhibit good photocatalytic efficiency.

  图 Scheme 1

  

  图 Scheme 1  Structure of the ligand

  Figure Scheme 1.  Structure of the ligand

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  1.   Experimental

  1.1   Materials and measurements

  All chemicals were commercially purchased. Elemental analyses for carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen were performed on a Thermo Science Flash 2000 element analyzer. FT-IR spectra were obtained in KBr disks on a PerkinElmer Spectrum One FTIR spectro-photometer in 4 000~450 cm^-1 spectral range. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) studies were performed with a Bruker AXS D8 Discover instrument (Cu Kα radiation, λ=0.154 184 nm, U=40 kV, I=40 mA) over the 2θ range of 5°~60° at room temperature. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was recorded on a Netzsch STA 449C thermal analyzer between 30 and 800 ℃ and a heating rate of 10 ℃·min^-1 in atmosphere. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed on a CHI760D electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instrument Company, ShangHai, China).

  1.2   Preparations of the complexes

  Synthesis of [Cu(PPCA)(H₂O)]·H₂O (HPU-7): a mixture of H₂PPCA (0.05 mmol, 10.15 mg), CuCl₂·2H₂O (0.10 mmol, 17.048 mg), absolute ethanol (2 mL) and H₂O (8 mL) was placed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel (25 mL), heated to 160 ℃ for 3 days, and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 ℃·h^-1. Purple block crystals of HPU-7 were obtained and picked out, washed with distilled water and dried in air. Elemental analysis Calcd. for C₈H₈CuN₄O₄(%): C 33.40, H 2.80, N 19.47. Found(%): C 33.27, H 2.87, N 20.18. IR (KBr, cm^-1): 3 449s, 1 611s, 1 420m, 1 279 m, 1 146m, 1 054m, 972w, 888m, 797m.

  Synthesis of {[Co(PPCA)(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n (HPU-8): a mixture of H₂PPCA (0.05 mmol, 11.2 mg), Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (0.10 mmol, 29.1 mg), CH₃CN (2 mL) and H₂O (8 mL) was placed in a Teflon-lined stainless steelv-essel (25 mL), heated to 160 ℃ for 3 days, and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 5 ℃·h^-1. Brown block crystals of HPU-8 were obtained and picked out, washed with distilled water and dried in air. Elemental analysis Calcd. for C₈H₈CoN₄O₄ (%): C 33.94, H 2.85, N 19.79. Found(%): C 33.69, H 2.47, N 20.08. IR (KBr, cm^-1): 3 446s, 1 611s, 1 428m, 1 370 w, 1 295m, 1 154m, 1 038m, 780m.

  1.3   X-ray crystallography

  X-ray Single-crystal diffraction analysis of HPU-7 and HPU-8 was carried out on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) by using φ-ω scan technique at room temperature. The structures were solved via direct methods and successive Fourier difference synthesis (SHELXS-2014), and refined by the full-matrix least-squares method on F² with anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-H atoms (SHELXL-2014)^[33]. The empirical absorption corrections were applied by the SADABS program^[34]. The H-atoms of carbon were assigned with common isotropic displacement factors and included in the final refinement by the use of geometrical restraints. H-atoms of water molecules were first located by the Fourier maps, then refined by the riding mode. The crystallographic data for HPU-7 and HPU-8 are listed in Table 1. Moreover, the selected bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 2.

  表 1

  

  表 1  Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 导出CSV

  Complex	HPU-7	HPU-8
  Empirical formula	C8H8CuN4O4	C8H8CoN4O4
  Formula weight	287.73	283.11
  Temperature/K	296	296
  Crystal system	Monoclinic	Monoclinic
  Space group	P21/c	P21/c
  a/nm	0.788 91(13)	0.854 8(4)
  b/nm	0.719 49(12)	1.372 0(6)
  c/nm	1.831 4(3)	0.930 5(4)
  β/(°)	100.825(3)	115.634(5)
  Volume/nm3	1.021 0(3)	0.983 9(8)
  Z	4	4
  Dc/(g·cm-3)	1.872	1.911
  μ/mm-1	2.149	1.755
  Crystal size/mm	0.30×0.20×0.20	0.30×0.20×0.20
  Rint	0.033 0	0.022 1
  F(000)	580.0	572.0
  Reflection collected, unique	5 049, 1 804	4 906, 1 731
  Goodness-of-fit on F2	1.033	1.049
  Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)]	R1=0.029 5, wR2=0.066 5	R1=0.024 1, wR2=0.057 7
  R indices (all data)	R1=0.040 2, wR2=0.071 7	R1=0.028 0, wR2=0.060 1

  表 2

  

  表 2  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 导出CSV

  HPU-7
  Cu(1)-N(1)ⅰ	0.192 6(2)	Cu(1)-N(2)	0.192 9(2)	Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	0.199 4(2)
  Cu(1)-N(3)	0.206 2(2)	Cu(1)-O(3)	0.239 8(2)	N(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	0.192 6(2)
  O(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	0.199 4(2)
  C(1)-O(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	116.00(17)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(2)	94.14(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	80.56(9)
  N(2)-Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	173.35(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(3)	172.41(10)	N(2)-Cu(1)-N(3)	79.23(10)
  0(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(3)	105.77(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(3)	100.34(9)	N(2)-Cu(1)-O(3)	94.33(9)
  0(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(3)	90.59(8)	N(3)-Cu(1)-O(3)	83.98(9)	Cu(1)-O(3)-H(3A)	109.7
  Cu(1)-O(3)-H(3B)	108.1
  HPU-8
  Co(1)-N(4)ⅰ	0.202 9(5)	Co(1)-N(3)	0.203 3(5)	Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	0.213 3(5)
  Co(1)-O(3)	0.215 8(5)	Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	0.218 7(6)	Co(1)-N(1)	0.220 6(5)
  N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	0.218 7(5)	N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	0.202 9(5)	O(1)-Co(1)ⅰ	0.213 3(5)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(3)	94.8(2)	N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	76.87(19)	N(3)-Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	171.61(19)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(3)	94.1(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-O(3)	92.5(2)	O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(3)	88.99(18)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	95.4(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	92.6(2)	O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	87.37(19)
  O(3)-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	168.76(19)	N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(1)	170.3(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-N(1)	75.7(2)
  O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(1)	112.63(19)	O(3)-Co(1)-N(1)	88.08(19)	N(2)ⅱ-Co(1)-N(1)	83.5(2)
  C(1)-N(1)-Co(1)	129.3(4)	C(4)-N(1)-Co(1)	113.5(4)	C(2)-N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	122.3(4)
  C(3)-N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	120.5(4)	C(5)-N(3)-Co(1)	120.4(4)	N(4)-N(3)-Co(1)	131.5(4)
  C(7)-N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	117.5(4)	N(3)-N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	133.6(4)	C(8)-O(1)-Co(1)ⅰ	116.4(4)
  Co(1)-O(3)-H(3A)	113.0	Co(1)-O(3)-H(3B)	113.9
  Symmetry codes: ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z+2 for HPU-7; ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z+1; ⅱx, -y+0.5, z+0.5; ⅱx, -y+0.5, z-O.5 for HPU-8

  1.4   Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue(MB)

  The procedure was as follows: 30 mg of the dissolved HPU-7 or HPU-8 was dispersed into 100 mL of MB aqueous solution (12.75 mg·L^-1), followed by the addition of four drops of hydrogen peroxide solution (H₂O₂, 30%). The suspensions were magneti-cally stirred in the dark for over 1 h to ensure adsorp-tion equilibrium of MB onto the surface of samples. And a 2.6 nm xenon arc lamp was used as a light source. An optical filter in the equipment of xenon arc lamp was used to filtering out the UV emission below 400 nm. Visible light then irradiated the above solutions for every 10 min until 110 min, and the corresponding reaction solutions were filtered and the absorbance of MB aqueous solutions was then measured by a spectrophotometer. For comparison, the contrast experiment was completed under the same conditions without any catalysts. The characteristic peak (λ=660 nm) for MB was employed to monitor the photocatalytic degradation process.

  2.   Results and discussion

  2.1   Crystal structures of complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Single-crystal X-ray measurement reveals that HPU-7 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. Its asymmetric unit consists of one Cu(Ⅱ), one PPCA^2- ligands and two water molecules. As shown in Fig. 1a, the Cu1 ion is five-coordinated by three N atoms from two ligands, two oxygen atoms from the carboxylic group of the ligand and water molecule creating the distorted tetragonal pyramid geometry. The carboxylate group of the PPCA^2- ligand adopts μ₁-:η^ⅰ:η^ⅰ coordination mode. The ligand ligates with two Cu(Ⅱ) ions using its two nitrogen atoms (N1 and N2) and one oxygen atom (O1) forming a two nuclear [Cu₂(PPCA)₂(H₂O)₂] unit. In the binuclear unit, the distance of adjacent Cu atoms is 0.395 31 nm. And then the adjacent nuclear units are linked through hydrogen bonds (O3-H3…N4 and O1W-H1B…O1) (Fig. 1b) resulting in a two-dimensional supramolecular architecture in Fig. 1c.

  图 1

  

  图 1  (a) Coordination environment of Cu(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-7 with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity; (b) Hydrogen bonds in HPU-7; (c) 2D supramolecular architecture connected by hydrogen bonds in HPU-7

  Figure 1.  (a) Coordination environment of Cu(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-7 with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity; (b) Hydrogen bonds in HPU-7; (c) 2D supramolecular architecture connected by hydrogen bonds in HPU-7

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Single-crystal X-ray measurement reveals that HPU-8 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. Its asymmetry unit includes one Co(Ⅱ), one H₂PPCA ligand and two water molecules. As shown in Fig. 2a, Co(Ⅱ) ion in a distorted octahedral environment is completed by four nitrogen atoms from three ligands, two oxygen atoms from a water molecule and the carboxylic group of one ligand. The ligand coordinates to three Co(Ⅱ) ions with its four nitrogen atoms and one oxygen atom (O1). Adjacent Co(Ⅱ) ions are connected by -N-N-bridges giving rise to binuclear units with the distances between Co…Co of 0.409 21 nm. It is different from the structure of HPU-7 that the N atom of pyrazine also participates in the coor-dination. Therefore, the binuclear units are connected together forming a two-dimensional network structure, as shown in Fig. 2b. Besides, there is guest water molecules embedded in adjacent layers, which generates hydrogen bonds with other O atoms. Furthermore, the adjacent layers are connected together by these hydrogen bonds resulting in a three-dimensional supramolecular architecture in Fig. 2d.

  图 2

  

  图 2  (a) Coordination environment of Co(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-8; (b) 2D layer of HPU-8; (c) 3D architecture connected by hydrogen bonds

  Figure 2.  (a) Coordination environment of Co(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-8; (b) 2D layer of HPU-8; (c) 3D architecture connected by hydrogen bonds

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  2.2   PXRD patterns and thermal stability analysis

  To confirm the phase purity of the two complexes, the PXRD patterns were recorded for HPU-7 and HPU-8, and they were comparable to the corres-ponding simulated ones calculated from the single crystal diffraction data (Fig. 3), indicating a pure phase of each bulky sample.

  图 3

  

  图 3  Powder XRD patterns for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Figure 3.  Powder XRD patterns for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  As shown in Fig. 4, HPU-7 show the first weight loss of 12.67% corresponding to the release of both guest and coordinated two water molecules (Calcd. 12.51%). Then, the framework is stable up to about 414 ℃. For HPU-8, the gradual weight change before 90 ℃ is attributed to the removal of both guest and coordinated two water molecules (12.89%, Calcd. 12.71%). Then, the major weight loss occurs in next step above 407 ℃, which may be ascribed to the decomposition of the coordination framework.

  图 4

  

  图 4  TG curves of the complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Figure 4.  TG curves of the complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  2.3   Physical characterizations

  To study the electrochemical synthesis of HPU-7 and HPU-8, cyclic voltammetry is performed using standard electrochemical equipment within the scan rate of 20 mV·s^-1 and potential range of -1 to 0.36 V. The CV curves show that HPU-7 and HPU-8 have good conductivities (Fig. 5). Besides, Mott-Schottky measurements were also conducted for better understanding the intrinsic electronic properties of the two complexes. As shown in Fig. 6, the slope of C^-2 values versus potential are observed indicating that both the two complexes show n-type semiconductors. The flat-bands potential of HPU-7 and HPU-8 determined from Mott-Schottky plots are -O.94 and -O.89 V, respectively, versus Hg/Hg₂Cl₂ electrode at pH 13.0. So the redox potential of the conduction bands of HPU-7 and HPU-8 are -O.70 and -O.65 V versus normal hydrogen electrode (NHE).

  图 5

  

  图 5  CV curves of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH solution

  Figure 5.  CV curves of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH solution

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  图 6

  

  图 6  Mott-Schottky plots of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH aqueous solution

  Figure 6.  Mott-Schottky plots of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH aqueous solution

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  2.4   Photocatalytic experiments

  Photocatalysts have attracted much attention due to their potential applications in purifying water and air by thoroughly decomposing organic compounds. To evaluate the photocatalytic performance of these complexes, the photocatalytic degradation of MB aqueous solution was performed at ambient tempera-ture. And the concentrations of MB versus reaction time of no complex and HPU-7 and HPU-8 are drawn in Fig. 7.

  图 7

  

  图 7  UV-Vis absorption of MB at different time intervals under high-pressure Hg lamp irradiation without (a) or with complexes HPU-7 (b) and HPU-8(c) as catalysts, respectively; (d) Plots of C_t /C₀ vs time for MB degradation without or with complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Figure 7.  UV-Vis absorption of MB at different time intervals under high-pressure Hg lamp irradiation without (a) or with complexes HPU-7 (b) and HPU-8(c) as catalysts, respectively; (d) Plots of C_t /C₀ vs time for MB degradation without or with complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  As shown in the Fig. 7, with the gradient changes of reaction time, both of the absorbency of the solution is gradually reduced at 660 nm. The degrada-tion rate is defined as (1-C_t/C₀)×100%, where C_t and C₀ represent the remnant and initial concentration of MB respectively. Without addition of these complexes, the MB degradation rate was only 59.14%. After addi-tion of HPU-7 and HPU-8, the MB degradation rates were 90.61% and 85.34% for HPU-7 and HPU-8, respectively. Therefore it was found that HPU-7 has better photocatalytic degradation efficiency.

  These results suggest that HPU-7 may be better candidate for photocatalytic degradation of MB. As mentioned in literature^[35-36], the photocatalytic mecha-nism is clarified as below: the electrons of the complex could be excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB). Then, the equal amount of positive vacancies is left in VB (h⁺). Besides, O₂ or hydroxyl (OH^-) absorbed on the surfaces of the photocatalysts could interact with the electrons (e^-) on the CB or the hole (h⁺) on the VB, respectively, which give rise to hydroxyl radicals (OH). As is known, the OH radical is the important factor for cleaving MB effectively in the above photocatalytic process. So the release difficulty of OH radicals determines the catalytic effects. OH radicals are generated by oxyg-enating H₂O₂, which are deactivated by photocatalyst generating LMCT. Therefore, the structures of photo-catalyst are the crucial issues for the faster generation speed of OH radicals. By comparison, HPU-7 owns more unsaturated metal sites which could reduce charge carrier recombination probability and generate OH radicals more easily. So HPU-7 shows better photocatalytic degradation efficiency.

  3.   Conclusions

  In summary, two new MOFs based on a multifunctional ligand were successfully synthesized, which display diverse structures from 0D to 2D frameworks. The pyrazinyl functional groups could adjust coordination numbers ligating to different metal ions, which contribute to the formation of different structural MOFs. In addition, their electrochemical properties are also studied. The result shows that they have good conductivities. So they both show good photocatalytic efficiencies for the decomposition of MB. Besides, HPU-7 with unsaturated metal sites could reduce charge carrier recombination probability and exhibit better photocatalytic efficiency. Further research is underway to synthesize other materials with better application in decomposing other dyestuff.

• 1. [1]

     Yang H, Wei Y L, Dong X Y, et al. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27: 1327-1331 doi: 10.1021/cm504350q

  2. [2]

     Wei Y S, Hu X P, Han Z, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139:3505-3512 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12847

  3. [3]

     王强, 徐睿, 王旭生.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(11):2038-2044 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.240WANG Qiang, XU Rui, WANG Xu-Sheng, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(11):2038-2044 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.240

  4. [4]

     季卿妍, 王倩, 李洪昕.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(11):2031-2037 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.245JI Qing-Yan, WANG Qian, LI Hong-Xin, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(11):2031-2037 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.245

  5. [5]

     Gao M L, Cao X M, Zhang Y Y, et al. RSC Adv., 2017, 7: 45029-45033 doi: 10.1039/C7RA08885J

  6. [6]

     Li Z X, Liu X F, Ling Y, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2017, 84:59-62 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.06.013

  7. [7]

     Murinzi T W, Hosten E, Watkins G M. Polyhedron, 2017, 137:188-196 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2017.08.030

  8. [8]

     Li S B, Zhang L, Wang J X, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2017, 82:57-60 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.05.017

  9. [9]

     Li H J, Wang Y, Cai H X, et al. RSC Adv., 2015, 5:89833-89838 doi: 10.1039/C5RA18219K

  10. [10]

      Meng W, Xu S, Dai L, et al. Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 230: 324-332 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.017

  11. [11]

      Guo X H, Li Y S, Peng Q Y, et al. Polyhedron, 2017, 133: 238-244 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2017.04.033

  12. [12]

      Li T T, Liu Y M, Wang T, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2017, 84:5-9 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.06.023

  13. [13]

      Cai S L, Huang Y, Gao Y, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2017, 84:10-14 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.06.022

  14. [14]

      Wu Z F, Guo L K, Huang X Y, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 56:7397-7403 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00505

  15. [15]

      Park J, Oh M. Nanoscale, 2017, 9:12850-12854 doi: 10.1039/C7NR04113F

  16. [16]

      Rajak R, Saraf M, Mohammad A, et al. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5:17998-18011 doi: 10.1039/C7TA03773B

  17. [17]

      Hou J Y, Luan Y, Huang X B, et al. New J. Chem., 2017, 41:9123-9129 doi: 10.1039/C7NJ00672A

  18. [18]

      Zhao H M, Xia Q S, Xing H Z, et al. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5:4449-4456 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00641

  19. [19]

      Tan Y X, Zhang Y, He Y P, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53: 12973-12976 doi: 10.1021/ic5020829

  20. [20]

      Dey A, Konavarapu S K, Sasmal H S, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16:5976-5984 doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01028

  21. [21]

      Meng X M, Zhang X Y, Wang X P, et al. Polyhedron, 2017, 137:81-88 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2017.08.004

  22. [22]

      Liu C B, Sun H Y, Li X Y, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2014, 47:80-83 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2014.04.034

  23. [23]

      Liu D M, Xie Z G, Ma L Q, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49: 9107-9109 doi: 10.1021/ic1009169

  24. [24]

      Ahmed A, Forster M, Jin J S, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7:18054-18063 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04979

  25. [25]

      Peng Y G, Huang H L, Liu D H, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8:8527-8535 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00900

  26. [26]

      Fan L Y, Yu K, Lv J H, et al. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46:10355-10363 doi: 10.1039/C7DT01666B

  27. [27]

      Bibi R, Wei L F, Shen Q H, et al. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2017, 62:1615-1622 doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.6b01012

  28. [28]

      Li Q, Xue D X, Zhang Y F, et al. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5:14182-14189 doi: 10.1039/C7TA02216F

  29. [29]

      Xia Q S, Yu X D, Zhao H M, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2017, 17:4189-4195 doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00504

  30. [30]

      He Y, Xu T, Hu J, et al. RSC Adv., 2017, 7:30500-30505 doi: 10.1039/C7RA04649A

  31. [31]

      Wang X L, Sun J J, Lin H Y, et al. CrystEngComm, 2017, 19:3167-3177 doi: 10.1039/C7CE00659D

  32. [32]

      Li L J, Yang L K, Chen Z K, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2014, 50:62-64 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2014.10.020

  33. [33]

      Sheldrick G M. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun., 2015, C71:3-8 http://journals.iucr.org/a

  34. [34]

      Sheldrick G M. SADABS, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1996.

  35. [35]

      Li H J, He Y L, Zhao W L, et al. Polyhedron, 2017, 133: 412-418 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2017.05.009

  36. [36]

      Wang X L, Luan J, Sui F F, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2013, 13:3561-3576 doi: 10.1021/cg400538c

• 

  Scheme 1  Structure of the ligand

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  (a) Coordination environment of Cu(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-7 with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity; (b) Hydrogen bonds in HPU-7; (c) 2D supramolecular architecture connected by hydrogen bonds in HPU-7

  Symmetry code: ^ⅰ -x, -1+y, -1+z; ^ⅱ 1+x, -1+y, -1+z; ^ⅲ 1-x, -1+y, 1-z; ^ⅳ 0.5-^x, -2.5+y, 0.5-z; ^ⅴ x, -2+y, -1+z

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) Coordination environment of Co(Ⅱ) ion in HPU-8; (b) 2D layer of HPU-8; (c) 3D architecture connected by hydrogen bonds

  Symmetry code: ^ⅰ -1+x, y, z; ^ⅱ -x, 1-y, -z; ^ⅲ -1+x, -1+y, z

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  Powder XRD patterns for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  TG curves of the complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Scan rate: 20 mV·s^-1

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  CV curves of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH solution

  Scan rate: 20 mV·s^-1

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Mott-Schottky plots of HPU-7 and HPU-8 in 0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH aqueous solution

  Scan rate: 20 mV·s^-1

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 7  UV-Vis absorption of MB at different time intervals under high-pressure Hg lamp irradiation without (a) or with complexes HPU-7 (b) and HPU-8(c) as catalysts, respectively; (d) Plots of C_t /C₀ vs time for MB degradation without or with complexes HPU-7 and HPU-8

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  Complex	HPU-7	HPU-8
  Empirical formula	C8H8CuN4O4	C8H8CoN4O4
  Formula weight	287.73	283.11
  Temperature/K	296	296
  Crystal system	Monoclinic	Monoclinic
  Space group	P21/c	P21/c
  a/nm	0.788 91(13)	0.854 8(4)
  b/nm	0.719 49(12)	1.372 0(6)
  c/nm	1.831 4(3)	0.930 5(4)
  β/(°)	100.825(3)	115.634(5)
  Volume/nm3	1.021 0(3)	0.983 9(8)
  Z	4	4
  Dc/(g·cm-3)	1.872	1.911
  μ/mm-1	2.149	1.755
  Crystal size/mm	0.30×0.20×0.20	0.30×0.20×0.20
  Rint	0.033 0	0.022 1
  F(000)	580.0	572.0
  Reflection collected, unique	5 049, 1 804	4 906, 1 731
  Goodness-of-fit on F2	1.033	1.049
  Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)]	R1=0.029 5, wR2=0.066 5	R1=0.024 1, wR2=0.057 7
  R indices (all data)	R1=0.040 2, wR2=0.071 7	R1=0.028 0, wR2=0.060 1

  下载: 导出CSV

  Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) for HPU-7 and HPU-8

  HPU-7
  Cu(1)-N(1)ⅰ	0.192 6(2)	Cu(1)-N(2)	0.192 9(2)	Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	0.199 4(2)
  Cu(1)-N(3)	0.206 2(2)	Cu(1)-O(3)	0.239 8(2)	N(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	0.192 6(2)
  O(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	0.199 4(2)
  C(1)-O(1)-Cu(1)ⅰ	116.00(17)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(2)	94.14(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	80.56(9)
  N(2)-Cu(1)-O(1)ⅰ	173.35(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(3)	172.41(10)	N(2)-Cu(1)-N(3)	79.23(10)
  0(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-N(3)	105.77(9)	N(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(3)	100.34(9)	N(2)-Cu(1)-O(3)	94.33(9)
  0(1)ⅰ-Cu(1)-O(3)	90.59(8)	N(3)-Cu(1)-O(3)	83.98(9)	Cu(1)-O(3)-H(3A)	109.7
  Cu(1)-O(3)-H(3B)	108.1
  HPU-8
  Co(1)-N(4)ⅰ	0.202 9(5)	Co(1)-N(3)	0.203 3(5)	Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	0.213 3(5)
  Co(1)-O(3)	0.215 8(5)	Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	0.218 7(6)	Co(1)-N(1)	0.220 6(5)
  N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	0.218 7(5)	N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	0.202 9(5)	O(1)-Co(1)ⅰ	0.213 3(5)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(3)	94.8(2)	N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	76.87(19)	N(3)-Co(1)-O(1)ⅰ	171.61(19)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(3)	94.1(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-O(3)	92.5(2)	O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-O(3)	88.99(18)
  N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	95.4(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	92.6(2)	O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	87.37(19)
  O(3)-Co(1)-N(2)ⅱ	168.76(19)	N(4)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(1)	170.3(2)	N(3)-Co(1)-N(1)	75.7(2)
  O(1)ⅰ-Co(1)-N(1)	112.63(19)	O(3)-Co(1)-N(1)	88.08(19)	N(2)ⅱ-Co(1)-N(1)	83.5(2)
  C(1)-N(1)-Co(1)	129.3(4)	C(4)-N(1)-Co(1)	113.5(4)	C(2)-N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	122.3(4)
  C(3)-N(2)-Co(1)ⅲ	120.5(4)	C(5)-N(3)-Co(1)	120.4(4)	N(4)-N(3)-Co(1)	131.5(4)
  C(7)-N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	117.5(4)	N(3)-N(4)-Co(1)ⅰ	133.6(4)	C(8)-O(1)-Co(1)ⅰ	116.4(4)
  Co(1)-O(3)-H(3A)	113.0	Co(1)-O(3)-H(3B)	113.9
  Symmetry codes: ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z+2 for HPU-7; ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z+1; ⅱx, -y+0.5, z+0.5; ⅱx, -y+0.5, z-O.5 for HPU-8

  下载: 导出CSV
•