Metal-free carbon quantum dots as photocatalyst for phosphonation of undirected heteroaryl compounds

Tong Yue Jun-Bo Wang Xin-Yue Wang Ming-Yi Huang Mo Zhang Zhan-Hui Zhang

Citation:  Tong Yue, Jun-Bo Wang, Xin-Yue Wang, Ming-Yi Huang, Mo Zhang, Zhan-Hui Zhang. Metal-free carbon quantum dots as photocatalyst for phosphonation of undirected heteroaryl compounds[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026, 37(8): 112050. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112050 shu

Metal-free carbon quantum dots as photocatalyst for phosphonation of undirected heteroaryl compounds

English

  • The traditional methods for construction of C-P bond are mainly based on transition-metal-mediated cross-coupling of boric acid [1], aryl halides [2], diaryliodonium salts [3], aryl nonaflates [4], aromatic esters [5], triarylbismuths [6], fluorosulfonates [7], arylsilanes [8] or aroylhydrazides [9] with organophosphorus creagents using palladium, nickel, or copper catalysts with air-sensitive ligands. However, these conventional protocols exhibit critical limitations including substrate prefunctionalization requirements, costly noble metal catalysts, and sophisticated ligand systems, which significantly restrict their practical applicability in synthetic chemistry. Innovative strategies focusing on transition metal-free cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) systems have emerged as viable alternatives, particularly the direct functionalization of heteroarenes with phosphite esters under metal-free conditions. This methodology circumvents prerequisite substrate activation, enabling direct C-H phosphonation through radical intermediates while preserving native functional groups [10]. Recent advances demonstrate that heteroaromatic frameworks containing electron-rich heterocycles (e.g., dibenzothiazepines, quinoxalinones, and pyrrolopyrimidines) can serve as efficient phosphonation substrates when activated by stoichiometric metal oxidants (e.g., Mn(OAc)3 or K2S2O8) under thermal conditions [11-18]. The operational efficiency of these transformations critically depends on the formation of stabilized cationic intermediates, which undergo rapid phosphorylation with nucleophilic phosphorus species.

    The heteroaryl compounds containing a furan or thiophene nucleus are widely found in natural products and pharmaceutical drugs [19-21]. The introduction of a phosphoryl group onto a heteroaryl skeleton can strengthen its bioactivities. Heteroaryl phosphorus compounds are also very important functional molecules widely used in diverse fields, such as drugs, advanced functional materials, agricultural chemistry, organic synthesis or even as ligands in catalysis (Fig. 1) [22-28]. Because of their extensive application, great efforts have been executed to develop efficient synthetic strategies for introducing the phosphonate esters into these heteroaryl skeleton [29]. In 2006, Zhang’s group reported direct phosphonation of thiazoles, furans, and pyrroles in the presence of 3 equiv. of Mn(OAc)3·2H2O in acetic acid at 80 ℃ (Scheme 1A) [30]. Afterward, several reports have been published using Cu(Ⅰ)/Cu(Ⅱ) as catalyst and K2S2O8 as oxidant (Scheme 1B) [31] and catalytic Mn(OAc)2/excess MnO2 system (Scheme 1C) [32] for this kind of transformation. Lei et al. has also introduced a Mn-catalyzed electrooxidative dehydrogenative C-H/P-H cross-coupling between electron-rich aromatics and phosphine oxides (Scheme 1D) [33].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Representative examples with phosphoryl group.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  The reported strategies and the present work for phosphonation of undirected heteroaryl compounds.

    In recent times, the employment of the visible light-induced catalytic system has been demonstrated as a more favorable option for achieving transition metal-catalyzed C-H phosphorylation under mild circumstances [34-37]. In 2022, visible light-induced cobaloxime (Co(dmgH)2Cl2) catalyze the phosphinoylation of undirected heterocycles in a nitrogen atmosphere in dichloromethane (DCM) was reported. (Scheme 1E) [38,39]. However, notwithstanding these advancements, these methods still fall short of meeting the criteria of green chemistry. This is mainly because of the utilization of high-cost transition metal catalyst and the highly toxic DCM solvent. From the perspective of environmental friendliness, it would be highly desirable to devise an environmentally benign method for constructing the C-P bond.

    Owing to their distinctive physicochemical characteristics, including exceptional specific surface area, tunable porosity, superior electrical conductivity, facile synthesis and functionalization, cost-effectiveness, and environmental compatibility, carbon-based materials have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional metal catalysts in various chemical processes [40-42]. Among these materials, carbon quantum dots (CQDs), a class of zero-dimensional carbon nanomaterials with particle sizes typically below 10 nanometers, have garnered significant attention in multidisciplinary applications. Their unique combination of properties, such as abundant precursor availability, tunable photoluminescence, remarkable quantum yield, excellent aqueous dispersibility, outstanding photostability, and favorable biocompatibility, has enabled their widespread utilization in diverse fields including biomedical imaging, optoelectronic devices, chemical sensing, and catalytic applications [43-48]. Particularly noteworthy is their role as efficient photosensitizers in visible-light-mediated organic transformations, demonstrating their potential in sustainable chemical synthesis [49-61]. In addition, 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran (2-Me THF) derived from biomass feedstocks, is a safe and low-toxic solvent with good stability to acids and bases. Building upon our recent explorations into sustainable synthetic methodologies [62-67] and considering the current scientific context, a novel photocatalytic application of nitrogen-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) was demonstrated as an efficient catalyst for direct C-P bond formation on diverse heteroaryl frameworks under mild conditions. The reaction system employed a mixed solvent composed of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-Me THF) and water at room temperature, achieving high selectivity for undirected heteroaromatic substrates without requiring directing groups or external oxidants (Scheme 1).

    Nitrogen doped carbon dots (N-CDs) were constructed by the hydrothermal method with citric acid and urea as raw materials. The synthesis process of N-CDs is shown in Scheme 2.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  Synthesis of N-CDs using citric acid and urea.

    To rigorously characterize the chemical functionalities of N-CDs, complementary surface analytical techniques were employed, including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The FT-IR spectrum of N-CDs (Fig. 2) revealed characteristic absorption features spanning the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm-1, indicative of diverse surface functional groups. A broad absorption band at 3237 cm-1 corresponds to O-H/N-H stretching vibrations, commonly observed in hydroxyl (-OH) and amine (-NH) moieties. A sharp peak at 1673 cm-1 is attributed to C=O stretching vibrations in amide (-CONH-) groups, originating from citric acid-urea condensation. Supplementary evidence of amide bond formation includes an in-plane N-H bending vibration at 1541 cm-1 and characteristic C=O stretching vibrations within the 1640–1680 cm-1 range, consistent with secondary amide structures. The retention of amide bond integrity post-recovery is confirmed by the absence of significant peak intensity shifts, underscoring structural stability of the synthesized N-CDs. The C-N stretching vibration in the amide linkage was identified at 1443 cm-1, while the band at 1074 cm-1 corresponds to C-O-C stretching, indicating ether bond formation through secondary cross-linking reactions. These groups not only stabilize the dispersion of quantum dots, but also can be used as active sites to adsorb reactants and reduce the activation energy of the reaction through coordination or hydrogen bonding.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  FTIR spectra of N-CDs (fresh and recycled).

    The surface chemical composition and bonding states of N-CDs were systematically investigated using XPS (Fig. 3). The survey spectrum (Fig. 3a) confirmed the predominant elemental constituents of carbon (C 1s), nitrogen (N 1s), and oxygen (O 1s). High-resolution deconvolution of the C 1s core level spectrum (Fig. 3b) revealed three distinct components. The peak at 283.82 eV corresponds to hybrid carbon (C=C/C-C), suggesting a graphitized core structure in the nitrogen-doped carbon dots. The peak at 286.85 eV is attributed to the C-N bond, originating from the amide bond (-CONH-) formed by the condensation of residual hydroxyl groups in citric acid or urea. The peak at 287.77 eV is assigned to the C=O bond (-COOH) in carboxylic acid or carbonyl groups, confirming the presence of surface carboxylic acid groups. The N 1s spectrum (Fig. 3c) exhibited a bimodal distribution corresponding to two distinct nitrogen species. The N 1s spectrum (Fig. 3c) exhibited a bimodal structure. The peak at 399.28 eV corresponds to pyridine nitrogen (C-N-C), indicating successful embedding of nitrogen atoms into the six-membered ring of the carbon core, which can modulate the electronic energy band structure. The peak at 400.23 eV is attributed to amino groups (-NH) or pyrrole nitrogen (C=N). O 1s deconvolution (Fig. 3d) resolved two components at 531.48 eV (C=O) and 532.73 eV (C-O), corresponding to carboxylic acid/carbonyl oxygen and hydroxyl/ether bond oxygen, respectively, consistent with the C 1s results. The combined FT-IR and XPS analyses confirm the successful formation of an aromatic sp2 carbon network in the N-CDs.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  High-resolution XPS spectra of the N-CDs: (a) Overall XPS spectrum, (b) C 1s XPS spectra, (c) N 1s XPS spectra, and (d) O 1s XPS spectra.

    The morphological features, size distribution, and structural uniformity of N-CDs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Fig. 4). The micrographs reveal monodisperse, spherical nanoparticles with uniform dispersion and no detectable aggregation. Quantitative size analysis (Fig. 4b) indicates a narrow size distribution with an average size below 10 nm, confirmed by log-normal fitting of the size distribution histogram. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping (Fig. 5) confirms uniform spatial distribution of constituent elements: Carbon (C) forms the primary matrix with homogenous intensity distribution, nitrogen (N) is primarily localized at core regions, indicative of graphitic nitrogen doping, oxygen (O) exhibits peripheral enrichment, correlating with surface functional groups.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  TEM image of the N-CDs (fresh and recycled).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  Mapping spectra of the N-CDs.

    The thermal decomposition behavior of N-CDs was systematically investigated through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) under nitrogen atmosphere (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). The TGA profile exhibited a multi-step thermal decomposition pattern with distinct mass loss stages (20–900 ℃), revealing the composite nature of the carbon-nitrogen matrix. In the temperature range of 20–120 ℃, an approximate weight loss of ~2% was observed, which is ascribed to removal of adsorbed moisture from surface hydroxyl groups. The second weight loss stage, occurring at 120–300 ℃ with a 20% mass loss, is primarily due to the thermal dissociation of oxygen/nitrogen functional groups (such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and amino) on the surface. These functional groups are introduced during the hydrothermal synthesis process through the condensation reaction of urea and citric acid. Their thermal stability is lower than that of the carbon skeleton, resulting in the precedence of decarboxylation or deamination reactions. The third stage of weight loss, which takes place at 300–500 ℃ with about 30% mass loss, corresponds to the gradual oxidation of the sp2/sp3 hybrid carbon-based skeleton and the structural collapse of nitrogen doping sites (such as pyridine nitrogen and graphitic nitrogen). The fourth stage of slow weight loss, occurring at 500–800 ℃ with about 15% mass loss, is associated with the transformation of residual amorphous carbon into a more stable graphite phase. This transformation is accompanied by trace carbon oxidation and ash residue formation, with the final carbon residue rate being approximately 35%. These findings indicate that the N-CDs as a target material possess thermal stability up to near 200 ℃.

    The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of N-CDs (Fig. S2 in Supporting information) exhibits a broad diffraction peak at 2θ = 25.5°, corresponding to a crystal plane spacing of 3.5 Å. This spacing matches the (002) plane of graphite carbon, confirming the formation of an sp2-hybridized carbon framework as the primary structural component. Notably, the experimental peak position demonstrates a negative shift of about 1° relative to the ideal graphite (002) plane (~26.5°), which can be attributed to two synergistic effects: Local lattice distortion caused by nitrogen atom doping and interlayer spacing expansion induced by the embedding of amino functional groups (from urea decomposition) into the carbon matrix. The pronounced peak broadening characteristics indicate two concurrent structural features: High defect density within the carbon lattice resulting from nitrogen incorporation and quantum confinement effects characteristic of nanoscale dimensions. These structural features align with the typical physicochemical properties of quantum dot materials, suggesting the coexistence of crystalline order and nanoscale disorder in the N-CDs structure.

    The optical properties of N-CDs were systematically investigated through UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The UV–vis absorption profile (Fig. S3 in Supporting information) exhibits three distinct absorption bands: A weak shoulder peak at 253 nm), assignable to ππ* transitions in sp2-hybridized aromatic domains; a broad absorption band spanning 300–550 nm, corresponding to n→π* transitions in carbonyl groups; a surface plasmon resonance feature at 620 nm, indicative of localized surface charge oscillations. Accordingly, the optical band gap energy is estimated to be 2.04 eV based on the Tauc plots calculated from the UV–vis DRS data (Fig. S4 in Supporting information).

    Fig. 6 presents the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of N-CDs across an excitation wavelength range of 300–480 nm. As shown, N-CDs exhibit distinct excitation wavelength-dependent fluorescence characteristics. When the excitation wavelength gradually increases from 300 nm to 480 nm, the intensity of the fluorescence emission peak reaches a maximum at 400 nm and then gradually decreases as the excitation wavelength further redshifts beyond this point. Notably, under 400 nm excitation, the strongest photoluminescence emission is observed at 480 nm.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Emission diagrams of the N-CDs with increasing excitation wavelengths from 300 nm to 480 nm in 20 nm increments.

    Consequently, N-CDs were applied in the phosphinoylation reaction. To the best of our knowledge, the utilization of carbon dots as photocatalysts for the phosphinoylation of non-directed heteroaryl compounds has not been reported previously. Hence, we sought to explore their catalytic potential in this reaction. 2-Methylthiophene (1b) and diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) were selected as model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1). A series of common solvents were screened under ambient temperature and blue light irradiation, with Cs2CO3 serving as the base. When CH3CN or DMSO was used as the solvent, the reaction yields were low; in contrast, 2-Me THF enabled the formation of the product with a reasonable efficiency. To further enhance the reaction efficiency, a mixed solvent system of 2-Me THF and H2O was investigated. Through subsequent optimization, employing a 2-Me THF/H2O (1/3) mixed solvent increased the yield of 3b to 85% (Table 1, entry 14). The introduction of water increases the solubility of Cs2CO3, thus promoting the reaction. Subsequently, various bases were evaluated (entries 15−23). The results indicated that substituting Cs2CO3 with other bases led to a decrease in the yield of 3b Screening different light sources revealed that a blue LED (450 nm) was the most effective for this reaction (entries 24−26). This phenomenon can be attributed to the energy band compatibility between the blue light and N-CDs; the energy of blue light aligns with the band gap (or surface state energy level) of N-CDs, facilitating efficient electron excitation to the conduction band and driving the photocatalytic reaction. Control experiments demonstrated that the reaction did not occur in the absence of a photocatalyst or under dark conditions (entries 27 and 28). Additionally, reducing the catalyst amount resulted in decreased reaction efficiency (entry 29), and shortening the reaction time to 12 h led to a lower yield of 3b (entry 31). Other potential photocatalysts, including 4-CzIPN, CdS, FeCl3, eosin B, rhodamine B, rose bengal, rhodamine 6G, and basic fuchsin, were also tested. However, none of them outperformed N-CDs in promoting the formation of the target product 3b (entries 32–39).

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions for synthesis of 3a.a
    DownLoad: CSV
    Entry Photocatalyst Solvent Base Time (h) Yield (%)b
    1 N-CDs EtOH Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    2 N-CDs CPME Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    3 N-CDs PEG 400 Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    4 N-CDs EL Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    5 N-CDs DMF Cs2CO3 24 8
    6 N-CDs EtOAc Cs2CO3 24 15
    7 N-CDs Acetone Cs2CO3 24 22
    8 N-CDs CH3CN Cs2CO3 24 32
    9 N-CDs DMSO Cs2CO3 24 33
    10 N-CDs THF Cs2CO3 24 35
    11 N-CDs H2O Cs2CO3 24 40
    12 N-CDs CH2Cl2 Cs2CO3 24 47
    13 N-CDs 2-Me THF Cs2CO3 24 70
    14 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 85
    15 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O NaHCO3 24 Trace
    16 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Na2CO3 24 Trace
    17 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O KOH 24 19
    18 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O K3PO4 24 36
    19 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O K2CO3 24 41
    20 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O DABCO 24 20
    21 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O DBU 24 33
    22 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Et3N 24 39
    23 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Pyridine 24 43
    24c N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 38
    25d N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 42
    26e N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 61
    27f N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    28 No 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 36 Trace
    29g N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 47
    30h N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 85
    31 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 12 48
    32 4-CzIPN 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 11
    33 CdS 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 21
    34 FeCl3 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 23
    35 Eosin B 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 32
    36 Rhodamine B 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 37
    37 Rose Bengal 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 35
    38 Rhodamine 6G 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 39
    39 Basic fuchsin 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 41
    a Reaction conditions: diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), 2-methylthiophene (2.5 mmol), photocatalyst (20 mg), solvent (3 mL), under light irradiation (10 W) at room temperature unless otherwise noted.
    b Isolated yield.
    c Red light.
    d Green light.
    e White light.
    f Dark.
    g N-CDs (10 mg).
    h N-CDs (25 mg).

    Once the optimal reaction conditions were established (Table 1, entry 14), the proposed photocatalytic methodology embarked to explore the substrate scope of heteroaryl compounds for the synthesis of heteroaryl phosphorus compounds. As vividly depicted in Scheme 3, various substituted thiophene derivatives, whether adorned with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups, eagerly reacted with diphenylphosphine oxide to give the desired products (3b-3g) with yields ranging from moderate to rather impressive. Interestingly, halogen groups (-F, -Cl, and -Br) on the thiophene ring turned out to be the easy-going guests of this chemical party. They were well-tolerated by the reaction conditions, which provides a possibility for further modification at those halogenated positions through classical cross-coupling reactions. Notably, when 3-substituted thiophene is used as the substrate, a mixture of 2- and 5-phosphorylated products (3h and 3i) is formed. The disubstituted thiophenes also proved themselves as excellent partners, smoothly coupling to generate the target products (3j-3m) with satisfactory yield. However, the reaction of diphenylphosphine oxide with some thiophene with hydroxyl and amine groups on ring failed to give the expected product.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Substrate scope for heteroaryl compounds with diphenylphosphine oxide. Reaction conditions: Diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), heteroaryl compounds (2.5 mmol), Cs2CO3 (1 mmol), N-CDs (20 mg), and 2-Me THF/H2O (1/3, 3 mL) under blue light irradiation at room temperature, 24 h, isolated yield.

    To put the versatility of this phosphonation process to an even tougher test, furan substrates took the stage. When reacted with diphenylphosphine oxide, they did not disappoint, delivering the corresponding products in high yields. Moreover, benzofuran is also a suitable substrate. Under the established reaction conditions, it delivered the expected phosphorylated product 3q with a yield of 70%. 1,3-Thiazole can also participate in this reaction to present the expected product 3r with a yield of 73%. When it came to 2,2′-bithiophene and thieno[2,3-c]thiophene, these double-thiophene-containing substrates, the reaction was highly selective. They only selectively produce single phosphorylation products 3s and 3t. No difunctional byproducts dared to show up, making the reaction a clean and precise operation. However, not all heteroaryl compounds exhibit compatibility with this photocatalytic system. Specifically, nitrogen-containing heterocycles (e.g., indole and pyrrole) fail to undergo effective phosphorylation under the optimized reaction conditions. A plausible rationale for this inactivity lies in their intrinsic structural and electronic properties. The active N-H moieties and electron-rich aromatic scaffolds of these heterocycles are hypothesized to impose a kinetic barrier that inhibits their engagement in the specific reaction pathway of the photocatalytic system. Furthermore, the bond dissociation energy of the expected reaction site of C(sp2)-H donors exerted significant influence on the phosphorylation. This energy mismatch dictates that the reaction would require overcoming an excessively high activation energy barrier to proceed, thereby precluding efficient transformation. Additionally, in this protic solvent systems, the N-H bonds of indole and pyrrole are prone to protonation. This protonation event reduces the electron density of the aromatic system, which further diminishes the reactivity of these heterocycles toward the phosphorylation process.

    Building upon the established optimal reaction conditions, a systematic investigation into the reactivity of diarylphosphine oxides was subsequently carried out. The detailed outcomes of this exploration are comprehensively summarized in Scheme 4. Diarylphosphine oxides, specifically 2-diphenyl phosphine oxides, featuring diverse substituents on the phenyl moiety, demonstrated remarkable reactivity. These compounds engaged in smooth chemical interactions with thiophene and furan, leading to the successful synthesis of the corresponding products. The yields of these reactions spanned a range from moderate to excellent, indicating the robustness and efficiency of the reaction system. Notably, cyclic phosphate esters emerged as highly reactive substrates within this reaction framework. They readily underwent the phosphorylation reaction, undergoing a chemical transformation that efficiently converted them into the desired products (4f and 4g). The high-yield formation of these products underscores the unique reactivity profile of cyclic phosphate esters under the specified reaction conditions, highlighting their potential for further exploitation in related synthetic endeavors. Furthermore, substrates incorporating a naphthyl group also displayed favorable reactivity characteristics. The successful formation of products from these naphthyl-containing substrates provides additional compelling evidence for the broad substrate scope and general applicability of the developed protocol. This finding not only expands the range of viable substrates but also reinforces the reliability and versatility of the established reaction conditions for the phosphorylation of various phosphorus-containing compounds.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4.  Substrate scope for substituted diphenyl phosphine oxides. Heteroaryl compound (2.5 mmol), substituted diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), N-CDs (20 mg), Cs2CO3 (1 mmol), and 2-Me THF/H2O (1:3, 3 mL) under blue light irradiation at room temperature, 24 h, isolated yield.

    To assess the practical applicability and scalability of the developed synthetic methodology, a gram-scale reaction was conducted. Specifically, 2-methylthiophene (25 mmol) and diphenylphosphine oxide (10 mmol) were employed as reactants, and the reaction was executed under the optimized conditions. Upon completion of the reaction, the target product 3b was isolated, yielding a separation yield of 82%. This result was in remarkable accordance with the findings obtained from the small-scale experiments, as vividly illustrated in Scheme 5. The close correspondence between the yields of the gram-scale and small-scale reactions not only validates the robustness and reliability of the developed protocol but also demonstrates its potential for industrial-scale applications. It provides compelling evidence that the synthetic approach can maintain consistent performance and efficiency even when the reaction scale is significantly increased, which is of great significance for the practical implementation of this methodology in both academic research and industrial production settings.

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5.  Gram-scale synthesis 3b

    In the context of sustainable chemical synthesis, both economic viability and environmental friendliness are of paramount importance. The reusability and stability of photocatalysts serve as crucial metrics for evaluating their catalytic performance and determining their potential for practical applications. To comprehensively assess these aspects of N-CDs, a model reaction involving 2-methylthiophene and diphenylphosphine oxide was carried out under the previously established reaction conditions. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and water, N-CDs were in the water layer and the product was in the ethyl acetate layer. The water layer containing N-CDs was collected and dialyzed with deionized water for 24 h. After being dried, the recovered N-CDs were employed in ten consecutive reaction cycles. The experimental results demonstrated an exceptional level of catalytic stability, as no significant decline in catalytic efficiency was observed for seven additional cycles (Fig. 7). However, it was observed that after the eighth cycle, the yield of isolated product gradually decreased. The decrease of yield can be attributed to the loss of catalyst in the recovery process. Moreover, the structural integrity of N-CDs was further investigated. FTIR and TEM analyses (Figs. 2 and 4) provided conclusive evidence that both the morphology and structure of N-CDs remained essentially unaltered even after the fifth reuse cycle. These findings not only highlight the remarkable reusability of N-CDs but also underscore their outstanding stability, thereby firmly supporting the potential of N-CDs as a promising photocatalyst for various catalytic transformations.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  Recyclability of N-CDs for the model reaction.

    Investigation of the reaction mechanism was conducted through systematic control experiments. The absence of catalytic activity upon introduction of CuCl2, a single-electron transfer (SET) quencher, suggested potential involvement of radical-mediated SET processes. Suppression of reaction efficiency was observed following addition of electron scavengers (K2S2O8) and hole scavengers (TEOA and ferrocene), confirming the necessity of both charge carriers in the transformation sequence. In addition, the reaction inhibition was observed with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxy (TEMPO) and 1,1-diphenylethylene, two distinct radical trapping agents. Notably, the product 3b can be successfully formed in nitrogen atmosphere, indicating that oxygen is not essential for this reaction (Scheme 6). Meanwhile, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) identified a 1,1-diphenylethylene-adducted intermediate species. Besides, electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy detected a P-centered radical species was observed by using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) as spin-trapping reagent (Fig. 8) [68]. Cumulative evidence from these complementary technologies confirms that this photoinduced reaction proceeded via a radical pathway.

    Scheme 6

    Scheme 6.  Control experiments.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  EPR signals of the reaction solution in the presence of DMPO as spin-trapping reagents.

    On the basis of the above experiments, a plausible mechanism pathway for this photoinduced phosphorylation is proposed (Scheme 7). Under visible light irradiation, N-CDs are excited, generating holes (h+) in the valence band (VB) and photogenerated electrons (e-) in the conduction band (CB), thus forming electron-hole pairs. The holes in the VB of N-CDs possess strong oxidizing properties and can abstract one electron from the diphenylphosphine oxide (2b) molecule. This induces a single-electron oxidation of diphenylphosphine oxide, leading to the formation of P-centered radicals (A). The generated P-centered radicals (A), acting as active species, undergo a nucleophilic addition reaction with 2-methylthiophene (1b). They attack the sites with high electron cloud density in the 2-methylthiophene molecule, resulting in the formation of a radical intermediate (B). The remaining holes in the VB of N-CDs abstract one electron from the radical intermediate B. This causes further oxidation of intermediate B, which is then converted into a carbocation intermediate (C). The carbocation intermediate (C) undergoes a deprotonation reaction, losing one proton (H+) to be converted into the target phosphorylated product (3b). Meanwhile, the hydrogen radicals (H·) generated by dissociation in the reaction process combine with each other and undergo a coupling reaction to form hydrogen gas (H2) as a by-product.

    Scheme 7

    Scheme 7.  Proposed reaction mechanism.

    A comparative analysis of the developed catalytic system and previously reported methodologies for the model reaction is presented in Table 2. Notably, the proposed approach employs metal-free carbon dots as the photocatalyst, with the reaction conducted in a tetrahydrofuran/water (2-Me THF/H2O) mixed solvent system. This configuration offers a greener alternative to the metal-based catalysts and toxic organic solvents utilized in earlier studies. Under mild reaction conditions, the developed catalytic system achieves efficient substrate conversion while sustaining a high target product yield. Distinct from previously reported catalytic systems featuring non-recoverable catalysts, the strategy proposed herein effectively addresses this critical limitation through catalyst recyclability. Additionally, the utilization of low-cost CDs minimizes material reduces the overall operational cost of the reaction process. Beyond simplifying the synthetic protocol, the developed method aligns with the core principles of green chemistry, as it minimizes waste generation, lowers energy consumption, eliminates the use of harmful organic solvents, and obviates the requirement for electrochemical equipment. Furthermore, in comparison with prior works [38,39], E-factor has been greatly improved from 3.30 to 0.76 (for detailed information, see Supporting information).

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Comparison of this catalytic system with the reported methods.
    DownLoad: CSV
    Entry Reaction condition Ref.
    1 (+) Carbon rod Pt(-), 7.5 mA, N2, 80 ℃, Mn(OAc)2·3H2O, 1,10-phen·H2O, nBu4NBF4, HOAc, 4 h, 81% [33]
    2 Co(dmgH)2pyCl, pyridine, N2, blue LEDs, r.t. in DCM, 24 h, 62% [38]
    3 Co(dmgH)2pyCl, triethylamine, N2, blue LEDs, r.t. in DCM, 36 h, 62% [39]
    4 N-CDs, Cs2CO3, blue LEDs, r.t. in 2-Me THF/H2O, 24 h, 85% This work

    In this study, we report a groundbreaking advancement in the field of photocatalysis, wherein carbon quantum dots (CQDs) are employed for the first time as efficient photocatalysts. Under ambient temperature conditions, these CQDs enable the direct dehydrogenative C-H phosphinoylation of a wide array of heteroaryl compounds with various H-phosphine oxides. This catalytic protocol provides a straightforward and efficient synthetic route to access a diverse library of heteroaryl organophosphorus compounds, which are of significant importance in organic synthesis, materials science, and medicinal chemistry. One of the notable features of this newly developed methodology is its scalability. The reaction can be readily adapted for gram-scale synthesis, facilitating potential industrial applications. Additionally, the utilization of a 2-methyltetrahydrofuran/water mixture as the reaction solvent not only promotes the reaction efficiency but also aligns with the principles of green chemistry by reducing the environmental impact associated with the use of conventional organic solvents. The designed CQDs exhibit remarkable reusability, maintaining their catalytic activity over seven consecutive reaction cycles without significant loss of efficiency. This outstanding recyclability, coupled with their low cost and non-toxic nature, highlights the potential of CQDs as promising alternatives to expensive metal-based catalysts and organic dyes in photo-driven organic reactions. The present work not only expands the application scope of carbon quantum dots in photocatalysis but also paves the way for the development of more sustainable and cost-effective synthetic strategies in the realm of organic transformations.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Tong Yue: Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Jun-Bo Wang: Data curation. Xin-Yue Wang: Data curation. Ming-Yi Huang: Data curation. Mo Zhang: Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Zhan-Hui Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

    The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work by Hebei Education Department (No. JZX2024004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22301060), Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Hebei Province (No. 236Z1404G), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2023M730914) and Project of Science and Technology Department of Hebei Province (No. 22567622H).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112050.


    1. [1]

      T.T. Fu, H.W. Qiao, Z.M. Peng, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 12 (2014) 2895–2902. doi: 10.1039/c3ob42470g

    2. [2]

      L.H. Hong, W.J. Feng, W.C, et al., Dalton Trans. 52 (2023) 5101–5109. doi: 10.1039/d3dt00033h

    3. [3]

      J. Xu, P.B. Zhang, Y.Z. Gao, et al., J. Org. Chem. 78 (2013) 8176–8183. doi: 10.1021/jo4012199

    4. [4]

      H. McErlain, L.M. Riley, A. Sutherland, J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 17036–17049. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02172

    5. [5]

      M.B. Kurosawa, R. Isshiki, K. Muto, J. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 7386–7392. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02839

    6. [6]

      R. Isshiki, K. Muto, J. Yamaguchi, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 1150–1153. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00080

    7. [7]

      T. Wang, S. Sang, L. Liu, et al., J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 608–617. doi: 10.1021/jo402392t

    8. [8]

      G.F. Zhang, J. Wang, C.F. Guan, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021 (2021) 810–813. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202001485

    9. [9]

      J.Y. Dong, L. Liu, X.Y. Ji, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 3198–3203. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00922

    10. [10]

      T.Q. Chen, J.S. Zhang, L.B. Han, Dalton Trans. 45 (2016) 1843–1849. doi: 10.1039/C5DT01896J

    11. [11]

      D. Saha, T. Kaur, A. Sharma, Asian J. Org. Chem. 5 (2016) 1280–1287. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201600283

    12. [12]

      C.D. Hou, Y.L. Ren, R. Lang, et al., Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 5181–5183. doi: 10.1039/c2cc30429e

    13. [13]

      M. Gao, Y. Li, L.J. Xie, et al., Chem. Commun. 52 (2016) 2846–2849. doi: 10.1039/C5CC08049E

    14. [14]

      H.J. Zhang, W.D. Lin, Z.J. Wu, et al., Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 3450–3453. doi: 10.1039/C4CC10017D

    15. [15]

      Y.F. Wang, Y.J. Yang, K. Jie, et al., ChemCatChem 10 (2018) 716–719. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201701361

    16. [16]

      Y. Yu, Z.B. Yue, L.G. Ding, et al., ChemistrySelect 4 (2019) 1117–1120. doi: 10.1002/slct.201804056

    17. [17]

      T. Kittikool, K. Phakdeeyothin, T. Chantarojsiri, S. Yotphan, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021 (2021) 3071–3078. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202100336

    18. [18]

      N. Sabat, L.P. Slavetínská, B. Klepetárová, M. Hocek, J. Org. Chem. 81 (2016) 9507–9514. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01970

    19. [19]

      S.P. Archna, P.A. Chawla, Bioorg. Chem. 101 (2020) 104026. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104026

    20. [20]

      N.V. Bhilare, P.B. Auti, V.S. Marulkar, V.J. Pise, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 21 (2021) 217–232. doi: 10.2174/1389557520666201202113333

    21. [21]

      Q.H. Liu, S.L. Kang, Z.S. Cui, et al., Green Chem. 26 (2024) 4803–4810. doi: 10.1039/d4gc00502c

    22. [22]

      M.V. Stambirskyi, T. Kostiuk, S.I. Sirobaba, et al., J. Org Chem. 86 (2021) 12783–12801. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01413

    23. [23]

      Q. Dang, S.R. Kasibhatla, W. Xiao, et al., J. Med Chem. 53 (2009) 441–451.

    24. [24]

      S. Ryu, P.G. Kim, M. Son, et al., Synth. Met. 301 (2024) 117538. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2023.117538

    25. [25]

      S. Cauteruccio, D. Dova, M. Benaglia, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014 (2014) 2694–2702. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301912

    26. [26]

      H.L. Mu, J.H. Ye, G.L. Zhou, et al., Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 38 (2019) 579–586.

    27. [27]

      J. Ohshita, Y. Kurushima, K.H. Lee, et al., Organometallics 26 (2007) 6591–6595. doi: 10.1021/om700765w

    28. [28]

      T. Benincori, S. Gladiali, S. Rizzo, F. Sannicolò, J. Org. Chem. 66 (2001) 5940–5942. doi: 10.1021/jo015738t

    29. [29]

      P. Zhang, Y.A. Wang, Z.X. Deng, J.T. Gao, Org. Biomol. Chem. 23 (2025) 546–578. doi: 10.1039/d4ob01461h

    30. [30]

      X.J. Mu, J.P. Zou, Q.F. Qian, W. Zhang, Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 5291–5293. doi: 10.1021/ol062082n

    31. [31]

      S. Hore, A. Srivastava, R.P. Singh, J. Org. Chem. 84 (2019) 6868–6878. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00670

    32. [32]

      O. Berger, J.L. Montchamp, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 12385–12388. doi: 10.1002/chem.201404507

    33. [33]

      S.Y. Wang, Q.L. Xue, Z.P. Guan, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 4295–4300. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00549

    34. [34]

      F.L. Zeng, Z.H. Jia, T.P. Loh, Adv. Synth. Catal. 366 (2024) 4536–4547. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202400819

    35. [35]

      R. Wang, X. Liu, H. Hou, M.F. Zheng, ChemCatChem 17 (2025) e202401842. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202401842

    36. [36]

      P.C. Cui, Z.C. Yin, G.W. Wang, Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 2663–2668. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00738

    37. [37]

      S.P.M. Ung, V.A. Mechrouk, C.J. Li, Synthesis 53 (2021) 1003–1022. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705978

    38. [38]

      A.L. Shao, J.F. Chen, L.X. Wang, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 4379–4387. doi: 10.1039/d2qo00662f

    39. [39]

      J.X. Yu, Y.Y. Cheng, C. Bin, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202209293. doi: 10.1002/anie.202209293

    40. [40]

      Y. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Duan, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 54 (2025) 2436–2482. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00338A

    41. [41]

      C. Xie, Z.W. Jiang, Y.Y. Pang, et al., Green Chem. 26 (2024) 6886–6899. doi: 10.1039/d4gc01621a

    42. [42]

      A. Bahuguna, A. Kumar, V. Krishnan, Asian J. Org. Chem. 8 (2019) 1263–1305. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201900259

    43. [43]

      A. Carioscia, E. Cocco, M.E. Casacchia, et al., ACS Catal. 14 (2024) 13429–13438. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c03532

    44. [44]

      C. Rosso, G. Filippini, M. Prato, ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 8090–8105. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01989

    45. [45]

      P. Wang, C.M. Chen, H.W. Ren, E.R. Duan, Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110725. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110725

    46. [46]

      V. Corti, B. Bartolomei, M. Mamone, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022 (2022) e202200879. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202200879

    47. [47]

      B.B. Chen, M.L. Liu, C.Z. Huang, Green Chem. 22 (2020) 4034–4054. doi: 10.1039/d0gc01014f

    48. [48]

      Y.L. Hu, O. Seivert, Y. Tang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202412341. doi: 10.1002/anie.202412341

    49. [49]

      D. Saini, A.K. Garg, C. Dalal, et al., ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5 (2022) 3087–3109. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.1c04142

    50. [50]

      F.Y. Villanueva, J. Manioudakis, R. Naccache, M.B. Majewski, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3 (2020) 2756–2765. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c00094

    51. [51]

      I.N. Chakraborty, P. Roy, P.P. Pillai, ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 7331–7338. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c04742

    52. [52]

      Y.Z. Han, H. Huang, H.C. Zhang, et al., ACS Catal. 4 (2014) 781–787. doi: 10.1021/cs401118x

    53. [53]

      D. Sarma, B. Majumdar, T.K. Sarma, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 16573–16585. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03811

    54. [54]

      Y. Yu, Q.S. Zeng, S.Y. Tao, et al., Adv. Sci. 10 (2023) 2207621. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207621

    55. [55]

      M. Sbacchi, M. Mamone, L. Morbiato, et al., ChemCatChem 15 (2023) e202300667. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202300667

    56. [56]

      K.K. Niu, R.Z. Zhang, X.Z. Yang, et al., ChemCatChem 17 (2024) e202301686.

    57. [57]

      S. Cailotto, M. Negrato, S. Daniele, et al., Green Chem. 22 (2020) 1145–1149. doi: 10.1039/c9gc03811f

    58. [58]

      C. Campalani, M. Durai, W. Leitner, A. Bordet, Green Chem. 27 (2025) 2666–2671. doi: 10.1039/d4gc05468g

    59. [59]

      M. Jouyandeh, S.S.M. Khadem, S. Habibzadeh, et al., Green Chem. 23 (2021) 4931–4954. doi: 10.1039/d1gc00639h

    60. [60]

      S. Paul, S. Panja, N. Hazra, et al., J. Org. Chem. 89 (2023) 91–100.

    61. [61]

      T.T. He, H.P. Wei, Y.B. Zhou, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 2918–2926. doi: 10.1039/d3qo00458a

    62. [62]

      S.L. Kang, T. Yue, Z.H. Zhang, et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 12 (2024) 18200–18210. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07589

    63. [63]

      J.B. Wang, T. Yue, Z.H. Zhang, et al., Green Chem. 26 (2024) 12034–12042. doi: 10.1039/d4gc05239k

    64. [64]

      Y. Guan, Y.L. Ying, Z.H. Zhang, et al., J. Catal. 443 (2025) 115938. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2025.115938

    65. [65]

      W.J. Li, J.B. Wang, Z.H. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110001. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110001

    66. [66]

      W.J. Li, Z.Q. Wang, J.B. Wang, et al., J. Catal. 430 (2024) 115308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2024.115308

    67. [67]

      Y. Guan, B. Wang, Y.L. Ying, P. Li, Z.H. Zhang, Green Chem. 27 (2025) 9165. doi: 10.1039/d5gc02137e

    68. [68]

      Z.J. Li, F.H. Fan, Z.Y. Zhang, et al., RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 27853–27856. doi: 10.1039/C5RA04136H

  • Figure 1  Representative examples with phosphoryl group.

    Scheme 1  The reported strategies and the present work for phosphonation of undirected heteroaryl compounds.

    Scheme 2  Synthesis of N-CDs using citric acid and urea.

    Figure 2  FTIR spectra of N-CDs (fresh and recycled).

    Figure 3  High-resolution XPS spectra of the N-CDs: (a) Overall XPS spectrum, (b) C 1s XPS spectra, (c) N 1s XPS spectra, and (d) O 1s XPS spectra.

    Figure 4  TEM image of the N-CDs (fresh and recycled).

    Figure 5  Mapping spectra of the N-CDs.

    Figure 6  Emission diagrams of the N-CDs with increasing excitation wavelengths from 300 nm to 480 nm in 20 nm increments.

    Scheme 3  Substrate scope for heteroaryl compounds with diphenylphosphine oxide. Reaction conditions: Diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), heteroaryl compounds (2.5 mmol), Cs2CO3 (1 mmol), N-CDs (20 mg), and 2-Me THF/H2O (1/3, 3 mL) under blue light irradiation at room temperature, 24 h, isolated yield.

    Scheme 4  Substrate scope for substituted diphenyl phosphine oxides. Heteroaryl compound (2.5 mmol), substituted diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), N-CDs (20 mg), Cs2CO3 (1 mmol), and 2-Me THF/H2O (1:3, 3 mL) under blue light irradiation at room temperature, 24 h, isolated yield.

    Scheme 5  Gram-scale synthesis 3b

    Figure 7  Recyclability of N-CDs for the model reaction.

    Scheme 6  Control experiments.

    Figure 8  EPR signals of the reaction solution in the presence of DMPO as spin-trapping reagents.

    Scheme 7  Proposed reaction mechanism.

    Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions for synthesis of 3a.a

    Entry Photocatalyst Solvent Base Time (h) Yield (%)b
    1 N-CDs EtOH Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    2 N-CDs CPME Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    3 N-CDs PEG 400 Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    4 N-CDs EL Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    5 N-CDs DMF Cs2CO3 24 8
    6 N-CDs EtOAc Cs2CO3 24 15
    7 N-CDs Acetone Cs2CO3 24 22
    8 N-CDs CH3CN Cs2CO3 24 32
    9 N-CDs DMSO Cs2CO3 24 33
    10 N-CDs THF Cs2CO3 24 35
    11 N-CDs H2O Cs2CO3 24 40
    12 N-CDs CH2Cl2 Cs2CO3 24 47
    13 N-CDs 2-Me THF Cs2CO3 24 70
    14 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 85
    15 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O NaHCO3 24 Trace
    16 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Na2CO3 24 Trace
    17 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O KOH 24 19
    18 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O K3PO4 24 36
    19 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O K2CO3 24 41
    20 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O DABCO 24 20
    21 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O DBU 24 33
    22 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Et3N 24 39
    23 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Pyridine 24 43
    24c N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 38
    25d N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 42
    26e N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 61
    27f N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 Trace
    28 No 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 36 Trace
    29g N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 47
    30h N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 85
    31 N-CDs 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 12 48
    32 4-CzIPN 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 11
    33 CdS 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 21
    34 FeCl3 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 23
    35 Eosin B 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 32
    36 Rhodamine B 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 37
    37 Rose Bengal 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 35
    38 Rhodamine 6G 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 39
    39 Basic fuchsin 2-Me THF/H2O Cs2CO3 24 41
    a Reaction conditions: diphenylphosphine oxide (1 mmol), 2-methylthiophene (2.5 mmol), photocatalyst (20 mg), solvent (3 mL), under light irradiation (10 W) at room temperature unless otherwise noted.
    b Isolated yield.
    c Red light.
    d Green light.
    e White light.
    f Dark.
    g N-CDs (10 mg).
    h N-CDs (25 mg).
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Comparison of this catalytic system with the reported methods.

    Entry Reaction condition Ref.
    1 (+) Carbon rod Pt(-), 7.5 mA, N2, 80 ℃, Mn(OAc)2·3H2O, 1,10-phen·H2O, nBu4NBF4, HOAc, 4 h, 81% [33]
    2 Co(dmgH)2pyCl, pyridine, N2, blue LEDs, r.t. in DCM, 24 h, 62% [38]
    3 Co(dmgH)2pyCl, triethylamine, N2, blue LEDs, r.t. in DCM, 36 h, 62% [39]
    4 N-CDs, Cs2CO3, blue LEDs, r.t. in 2-Me THF/H2O, 24 h, 85% This work
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  15
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2026-08-15
  • 收稿日期:  2025-07-23
  • 接受日期:  2025-10-31
  • 修回日期:  2025-10-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-11-03
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章