Syntheses, Characterization and Luminescent Properties of Silver(Ⅰ) Complexes Based on Diphosphine Ligands

Yu WANG Yang-Zhe CUI Min LIU Meng-Qin WANG Wen-Xiao GENG Zhong-Feng LI Qiong-Hua JIN

Citation:  WANG Yu, CUI Yang-Zhe, LIU Min, WANG Meng-Qin, GENG Wen-Xiao, LI Zhong-Feng, JIN Qiong-Hua. Syntheses, Characterization and Luminescent Properties of Silver(Ⅰ) Complexes Based on Diphosphine Ligands[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 34(2): 381-386. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.034 shu

含有双膦配体的银(Ⅰ)配合物的合成、表征和荧光性质

    通讯作者: 金琼花, jinqh@cnu.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    北京市优秀人才项目 2010D005016000002

    北京市自然科学基金 2172012

    北京教育委员会基金 KM201210028020

    国家自然科学基金 81573822

    国家自然科学基金(No.21171119,81573822)、北京教育委员会基金(No.KM201210028020)、北京市优秀人才项目(No.2010D005016000002)和北京市自然科学基金(No.2172017,2172012)资助项目

    北京市自然科学基金 2172017

    国家自然科学基金 21171119

摘要: 在甲醇与二氯甲烷的混合溶液中分别合成了2个新的银(Ⅰ)配合物,[Ag(XANTphos)]BF41)和[Ag2Cl2(DPEphos)2]·2CH2Cl22)(XANTphos=4,5-双二苯基膦-9,9-二甲基氧杂蒽;DPEphos=双((2-二苯膦基)苯基)醚),通过红外光谱、X射线单晶衍射、核磁共振氢谱和荧光光谱进行分析和表征。1是由AgBF4,XANTphos和dmp(2,9-二甲基-1,10-菲咯啉)以1:1:1的计量比反应得到的单核化合物。中心原子Ag(Ⅰ)均通过双膦配体(XANTphos)的螯合作用形成环。而2是由AgCl和DPEphos以1:1的比例反应得到的双核化合物。在配合物2的非对称单元中,每个DPEphos配体与一个银离子螯合,且含有一个游离的二氯甲烷。荧光光谱表明配合物12的所有发射峰均源于配体中的π-π*跃迁。

English

  • 0   Introduction

    In recent years, the study of silver(Ⅰ) complexes based on organic phosphine, especially diphosphine ligands, has attracted considerable attention[1-4]. In coor-dination chemistry, self-assembled silver(Ⅰ) complexes usually have structural diversity and potential appli-cations in luminescent material and antimicrobial[5-8]. According to the hard-soft-acid-base (HSAB) theory, as P-donor ligands, bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)ether (DPEphos) and 9, 9-dimethyl-4, 5-bis(diphenyl-phosphanyl)xanthene (XANTphos) can both easily coordinate with Ag(Ⅰ) salts. Since the transition metal chemistry and catalytic function of DPEphos and XANTphos ligands were studied by van Leeuwan and his co-workers[9] for the first time, various researches about Ag(Ⅰ) complexes on the two ligands have been published[10-12].

    Ag(Ⅰ)-DPEphos/XANTphos complexes are widely studied by us and other researchers[13-17]. In these complexes, DPEphos/XANTphos is a kind of chelated P-donor ligands, and some bridged co-ligands help to form 1D infinite chains. In some complexes the existence of weak interactions makes the 1D infinite chain structures expanding to 2D networks or 3D architectures. The type of weak interactions appeared in these complexes are hydrogen bond, C-H…π, ππ, anion…π and so on, which can also help to stabilize the supramolecular coordination polymers[8].

    In this paper, two novel Ag-diphosphine comp-lexes, namely [Ag(XANTphos)]BF4 (1) and [Ag2Cl2(DPEphos)2]·2CH2Cl2 (2), have been synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction, IR, 1H NMR and fluorescence spectra. The weak interactions and lumin-escent properties of these complexes are discussed.

    1   Experimental

    1.1   Materials and measurements

    All chemical reagents are commercially available and used without furthermore treatment. FT-IR spectra (KBr pellets) were measured on a Perkin-Elmer Infrared spectrometer. C, H and N elemental analysis were carried out on an Elementar Vario MICRO CUBE (Germany) elemental analyzer. Room-temperature fluorescence spectra were measured on F-4500 FL Spectrophotometer. 1H NMR was recorded at room temperature with a Bruker DPX 600 spectro-meter.

    1.2   Synthesis of [Ag(XANTphos)]BF4 (1)

    Complex 1 was prepared by the reaction of AgBF4 (0.038 4 g, 0.2 mmol), XANTphos (0.115 7 g, 0.2 mmol) and dmp (0.041 7 g, 0.2 mmol, dmp=neocuproine) in the mixed solvents of 5 mL CH2Cl2 and 5 mL CH3OH. The mixture was stirred for 6 h and filtered. Colorless crystals were obtained from the filtrate after standing at room temperature for several days. Yield: 71%. Element analysis Calcd. for C79H68AgBF4O3P4(%): C, 68.51; H, 4.92. Found(%): C, 68.08; H, 4.61. IR data (cm-1, KBr pellets): 3 514w, 3 053w, 2 958w, 1 971w, 1 815w, 1 621m, 1 590m, 1 502m, 1 478vs, 1 434vs, 1 402s, 1 360s, 1 327s, 1 306m, 1 284s, 1 218s, 1 198m, 1 151m, 1 057s, 870m, 857m, 801m, 778s, 746s, 610w, 588w, 548w, 537w, 514s, 498s, 460m. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): δ 7.9~8.4 (m, dissociative dmp-ph), 7.03~7.60 (m, overlap with the solvent peak signal, XANTphos-ph), 2.48 (s, dissociative dmp-CH3), 1.62 (s, 12H, XANTphos-CH3).

    1.3   Synthesis of [Ag2Cl2(DPEphos)2]·2CH2Cl2 (2)

    A mixture of AgCl (0.028 7 g, 0.02 mmol) and DPEphos (0.106 8 g, 0.2 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL CH2Cl2 and 5 mL CH3OH, stirred for 6 h and filtered. Colorless crystal 2 was obtained from the filtrate after standing at the room temperature for several days. Yield: 63%. Element analysis Calcd. for C74H60Ag2Cl6O2P4(%): C, 57.91; H, 3.91. Found(%): C, 57.56; H, 3.60. IR data (cm-1, KBr pellets): 3 422m, 3 051m, 1 624w, 1 586w, 1 564w, 1 479w, 1 461s, 1 434s, 1 259m, 1 222s, 1 159w, 1 095m, 1 027w, 876w, 801w, 745s, 695s, 507m, 422w.1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): δ 7.16~6.66 (m, CHbenzene), 5.29 (s, CHCH2Cl2)

    1.4   Structure determination

    Single crystals of the title complexes were mounted on a Bruker Smart 1000 CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromated Mo (λ=0.071 073 nm) radiation at 298 K. Semi-empirical absorption corrections were applied using SABABS program[18]. All the structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS program of the SHELXTL-97 package and refined with SHELXL-97[19-20]. Metal atom centers were located from the E-maps and other non-hydrogen atoms were located in successive difference Fourier syntheses. The final refinements were performed by full matrix least-squares methods with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-hydrogen atoms on F2. The hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically and refined with displacement parameters riding on the concerned atoms.

    Crystallographic data and experimental details for structural analysis are summarized in Table 1, and selected bond lengths and angles of complexes 1~2 are summarized in Table 2.

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1~2
    Complex 1 2
    Formula C79H68AgBF4O3P4 C74H60Ag2Cl6O2P4
    Formula weight 1 383.89 1 533.54
    Crystal system Triclinic Triclinic
    Space group P1 P1
    Crystal size / mm 0.45×0.40×0.30 0.36×0.328×0.31
    a/nm 1.303 20(11) 1.202 80(11)
    b / nm 1.320 71(12) 1.258 11(12)
    c / nm 2.033 09(16) 1.422 69(13)
    α/(°) 95.033 0(10) 114.590(3)
    β/(°) 93.985 0(10) 98.963 0(10)
    γ/(°) 98.125(2) 107.292(2)
    V/ nm3 3.438 8(5) 1.769 7(3)
    Z 2 1
    F(000) 1 428 776
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.027 1.077
    Rint 0.039 3 0.064 4
    R1 [I > 2σ(I)]a 0.051 2 0.067 8
    wR2[I > 2σ(I)]b 0.084 1 0.152 2
    R1 (all data)a 0.098 6 0.123 9
    wR2 (all data)b 0.092 4 0.166 0
    a R=∑(||Fo|-|Fc||)/∑|Fo|; b wR=[∑w(|Fo|2-|Fc|2)2/∑w(Fo2)]1/2.
    Table 2.  Selected bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) for complexes 1~2
    Complex 1
    Ag(1)-P(3) 0.257 9(4) Ag(1)-P(2) 0.259 1(8) Ag(1)-P(1) 0.258 5(6)
    Ag(1)-P(4) 0.256 0(5)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(2) 108.00(7) P(3)-Ag(1)-P(4) 104.86(9) P(2)-Ag(1)-P(4) 107.46(9)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(3) 106.95(8)
    Complex 2
    Ag(1)-P(1) 0.246 4(2) Ag(1)-Cl(1) 0.262 6(2) Ag(1)-P(2) 0.249 5(2)
    Ag(1)-Cl(1) 0.259 3(2)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(2) 111.33(7) P(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 114.67(7) P(2)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 105.05(8)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 116.76(8) P(2)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 112.59(7) Cl(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 94.92(6)
    Symmetry codes: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z

    CCDC: 1555835, 1; 1508048, 2.

    2   Results and discussion

    2.1   Syntheses of the complexes

    Two functional Ag(Ⅰ) complexes 1~2 have been synthesized by one-pot reaction of different silver(Ⅰ) salts with DPEphos and XANTphos ligands (Scheme 1). The influence of the anions on the coordination modes of the complexes has been discussed in the literatures[21-22]. We also have reported the structures of some metal complexes which are affected by the coordination modes[23-24]. In complex 2, two silver atoms are connected by halogen atoms; however, the tetrafluoroborate anion is free in complex 1.

    图Scheme 1 Routine of synthesis for complexes 1 and 2 Scheme1. Routine of synthesis for complexes 1 and 2

    2.2   Description of crystal structures

    Complex 1 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system and contains a crystallographic center of symmetry (Fig. 1). In complex 1, the central ion Ag(Ⅰ) forms a ring by the chelating bisphosphine ligand (XANTphos), and each Ag(Ⅰ) is coordinated with a P atom from a different XANTphos molecule to form a distorted tetrahedron. Compared to the similar Ag-XANTphos complex, the Ag-P (0.258 5 and 0.259 1 nm) distance in complex 1 is longer than that in [AgBr(XANTphos)(py2SH)]·C2H5OH (Ag-P 0.248 4 and 0.250 0 nm)[16], and the P-Ag-P angle (108.00°) is smaller than that in the complex above.

    图1 Molecular structure of complex 1 Figure1. Molecular structure of complex 1

    Complex 2 consists of inversion symmetric dimers with a diamond-shaped Ag2Cl2 group at the center. In the asymmetric unit of complex 2, each DPEphos ligand chelates one silver(Ⅰ) cation with a free dichlorome-thane in it. Two silver cations are connected by two Cl- anions in the formation of a binuclear structure (Fig. 2). The sum of the internal angles of the four-member ring [-Ag-Cl-Ag-Cl-] in the Ag2Cl2 core are 360°, demonstrating that the ring is a parallelogram. The geometry around each silver center is distorted tetrahedral, which is evident from the angles around the Ag ion in the range of 94.92°~116.76°. The distance of Ag…Ag is 0.352 9 nm, which exceeds the sum of two van der Waals radius of silver atoms (0.344 0 nm)[25], so the metal-metal interaction can be neglected in complex 2. The bite angle of the DPEphos ligand is 111°, which is 9° larger than its natural bite angle (βn)[9]. In both of two complexes in this paper, the ether O atoms of the DPEphos ligands are always at a nonbonding distance from the metal centers. The lattice structure is stabilized by an inter-molecular ππ stacking interactions (Fig. 3) between the C19-C24 rings of DPEphos ligand, with the interplanar distance of 0.381 3 nm. The center-of-mass coordinate of the ring is (-0.014 48, 0.389 77, 0.561 57) and the dihedral angle is 0°. The adjacent molecules in complex 2 are connected by the ππ weak interactions to form a 1D infinite chain (Fig. 4). The distance of Cl…π weak interaction (0.383 0 nm) found in complex 2 is shorter than that in the litera-ture[8]. Those weaker interactions stabilize the supra-molecular frameworks.

    图2 Molecular structure of complex 2 Figure2. Molecular structure of complex 2
    图3 Neighboring molecular entities of the cations in complex 2 displaying the offset ππ interaction Figure3. Neighboring molecular entities of the cations in complex 2 displaying the offset ππ interaction
    图4 One dimensional structure bridging by ππ interaction of complex 2 Figure4. One dimensional structure bridging by ππ interaction of complex 2

    2.3   Infrared and 1H NMR spectroscopy

    The infrared spectra of 1~2 show C-C stretch vibration of the phenyl rings whose absorptions are found in 1 434 cm-1. The middle absorptions around 3 051 cm-1 are caused by C-H vibration of the phenyl rings.The absorption in 1 057 cm-1 is derived from tetrafluoroborate (BF4-) in complex 1.

    The singlet near δ 1.62 in 1H NMR spectrum of 1 is assigned to the protons of methylene groups in the aromatic rings from XANTphos ligand. The 1H NMR spectrum of complexes 2 exhibit signals (multiple peaks) between 7.1 and 6.6, which can be attributed to protons from the benzene rings of the bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)ether (DPEphos) ligand. In complex 2, the signals of protons from the dichloro-methane solvent molecule are shown at 5.29.

    2.4   Fluorescence spectra

    At room temperature, the solid-state excitation and emission spectra of complexes 1~2 and the DPEphos and XANTphos ligands were measured. When being excited at 332 nm, the XANTphos ligand displays a fluorescence emission peak at 409 nm, and the emission peak of the DPEphos ligand is found at 431 nm with excitation at 363 nm (Fig. 5). It was found that the emission peak is centered at 487 nm with λex=370 nm for complex 1, and it is centered at 438 nm with λex=361 nm for complex 2 (Fig. 6). Compared to the free ligand, the emission peak of 1 is red-shifted by about 78 nm, however, the emission peak of 2 is red-shifted by about 7 nm. The difference of luminescent properties is attributed to their different structures. These shifts of emission peak are derived from ligand-centered π-π* transition.

    图5 Luminescent spectra of XANTphos and DPEphos ligands in the solid state at room temperature Figure5. Luminescent spectra of XANTphos and DPEphos ligands in the solid state at room temperature
    图6 Luminescent spectra of 1~2 in the solid state at 298 K Figure6. Luminescent spectra of 1~2 in the solid state at 298 K

    3   Conclusions

    Two novel Ag-biphosphine complexes, namely [Ag(XANTphos)]BF4 and [Ag2Cl2(DPEphos)2]·2CH2Cl2, have been synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction, IR, 1H NMR and fluorescence spectra. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that the complex 1 crystallizes with triclinic system, P1 space group. Complex 2 consists of inversion symmetric dimers with a diamond-shaped Ag2Cl2 group at the center. The adjacent molecules in complex 2 are connected by ππ weak interactions to form a 1D infinite chain. In the emission spectra, shifts of emission peak are derived from ligand-centered π-π* transition. We hope our results could offer a new strategy for the design of supramolecular complexes.

    1. [1]

      Cook A W, Nguyen T D, Buratto W R, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55:12435-12440 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02385

    2. [2]

      Streitberger M, Schmied A, Hoy R, et al. Dalton Trans., 2016, 45:11644-11649 doi: 10.1039/C6DT00945J

    3. [3]

      Zavras A, Khairallah G N, Connell T U, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53:7429-7437 doi: 10.1021/ic5007499

    4. [4]

      李中锋, 张彦茹, 崔洋哲, 等.无机化学学报, 2015, 31(8):1637-1643 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150824&flag=1LI Zhong-Feng, ZHANG Yan-Ru, CUI Yang-Zhe, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2015, 31(8):1637-1643 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150824&flag=1

    5. [5]

      Najafabadia B K, Corrigan J F. Chem. Commun., 2015, 51:665-667 doi: 10.1039/C4CC06560C

    6. [6]

      Lim S H, Cohen S M. Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52:7862-7872 doi: 10.1021/ic302840x

    7. [7]

      Jaros S W, Silva M C, Florek M, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55:5886-5894 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00186

    8. [8]

      Rajput G, Yadav M K, Drew M G B, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54:2572-2579 doi: 10.1021/ic502688h

    9. [9]

      Kranenburg M, van der Burgt Y, Kamer P, et al. Organome-tallics, 1995, 14:3081-3089 doi: 10.1021/om00006a057

    10. [10]

      Kaeser A, Moudam O, Accorsi G, et al. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2014:1345-1355

    11. [11]

      Freudenmann D, Feldmann C. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2011, 375:311-313 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.05.006

    12. [12]

      Moudam O, Tsipis A C, Kommanaboyina S, et al. RSC Adv., 2015, 5:95047-95053 doi: 10.1039/C5RA12921D

    13. [13]

      Gao S, Li Z F, Liu M, et al. Polyhedron, 2014, 83:10-15 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2014.03.028

    14. [14]

      Cui Y Z, Yuan Y, Han H L, et al. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2016, 642(18):953-959 doi: 10.1002/zaac.201600193

    15. [15]

      Zhang Y R, Cui Y Z, Jin Q H, et al. Polyhedron, 2017, 122:86-98 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.10.033

    16. [16]

      Kaltzoglou A, Cox P J, Aslanidis P. Polyhedron, 2007, 26:1634-1642 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2006.12.006

    17. [17]

      张彦茹, 王梦秦, 崔洋哲, 等.无机化学学报, 2015, 31(10):2089-2094 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20151024&flag=1ZHANG Yan-Ru, WANG Meng-Qin, CUI Yang-Zhe, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2015, 31(10):2089-2094 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20151024&flag=1

    18. [18]

      SMART and SAINT, Siemens Analytical X-ray Instrument Inc., Madison, WI, 1996.

    19. [19]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXS-97 and SHELXL-97, Madison, WI, USA, 1997.

    20. [20]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXTL NT Ver. 5. 1, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

    21. [21]

      Li X X, Gong Y Q, Zhao H X, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53:12127-12134 doi: 10.1021/ic501978u

    22. [22]

      Lee J, Kang Y, Cho N S, et al. Cryst.Growth Des., 2016, 16:996-1004 doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01544

    23. [23]

      Song L L, Jin Q H, Cui L N, et al. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2010, 363:2425-2429 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2010.03.075

    24. [24]

      Li J B, Fan W W, Liu M, et al. J. Mol. Struct., 2015, 1085:235-241 doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.12.068

    25. [25]

      Sculfort S, Braunstein P. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40:2741-2760 doi: 10.1039/c0cs00102c

  • Scheme 1  Routine of synthesis for complexes 1 and 2

    Figure 1  Molecular structure of complex 1

    All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Thermal ellipsoids: 30% probability level

    Figure 2  Molecular structure of complex 2

    All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Thermal ellipsoids: 30% probability level; Symmetry codes: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z

    Figure 3  Neighboring molecular entities of the cations in complex 2 displaying the offset ππ interaction

    All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: -x, 1-y, 1-z

    Figure 4  One dimensional structure bridging by ππ interaction of complex 2

    Symmetry codes: -x, 1-y, 1-z; -1+x, y, z; -1-x, 1-y, 1-z; -2+x, y, z; -2-x, 1-y, 1-z

    Figure 5  Luminescent spectra of XANTphos and DPEphos ligands in the solid state at room temperature

    Figure 6  Luminescent spectra of 1~2 in the solid state at 298 K

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1~2

    Complex 1 2
    Formula C79H68AgBF4O3P4 C74H60Ag2Cl6O2P4
    Formula weight 1 383.89 1 533.54
    Crystal system Triclinic Triclinic
    Space group P1 P1
    Crystal size / mm 0.45×0.40×0.30 0.36×0.328×0.31
    a/nm 1.303 20(11) 1.202 80(11)
    b / nm 1.320 71(12) 1.258 11(12)
    c / nm 2.033 09(16) 1.422 69(13)
    α/(°) 95.033 0(10) 114.590(3)
    β/(°) 93.985 0(10) 98.963 0(10)
    γ/(°) 98.125(2) 107.292(2)
    V/ nm3 3.438 8(5) 1.769 7(3)
    Z 2 1
    F(000) 1 428 776
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.027 1.077
    Rint 0.039 3 0.064 4
    R1 [I > 2σ(I)]a 0.051 2 0.067 8
    wR2[I > 2σ(I)]b 0.084 1 0.152 2
    R1 (all data)a 0.098 6 0.123 9
    wR2 (all data)b 0.092 4 0.166 0
    a R=∑(||Fo|-|Fc||)/∑|Fo|; b wR=[∑w(|Fo|2-|Fc|2)2/∑w(Fo2)]1/2.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) for complexes 1~2

    Complex 1
    Ag(1)-P(3) 0.257 9(4) Ag(1)-P(2) 0.259 1(8) Ag(1)-P(1) 0.258 5(6)
    Ag(1)-P(4) 0.256 0(5)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(2) 108.00(7) P(3)-Ag(1)-P(4) 104.86(9) P(2)-Ag(1)-P(4) 107.46(9)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(3) 106.95(8)
    Complex 2
    Ag(1)-P(1) 0.246 4(2) Ag(1)-Cl(1) 0.262 6(2) Ag(1)-P(2) 0.249 5(2)
    Ag(1)-Cl(1) 0.259 3(2)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-P(2) 111.33(7) P(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 114.67(7) P(2)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 105.05(8)
    P(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 116.76(8) P(2)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 112.59(7) Cl(1)-Ag(1)-Cl(1) 94.92(6)
    Symmetry codes: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 文章访问数:  2108
  • HTML全文浏览量:  138
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2018-02-10
  • 收稿日期:  2017-08-01
  • 修回日期:  2017-11-10
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章