English

Metallic Tungsten Carbide Coupled with Liquid-Phase Dye Photosensitizer for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

• Yonggang Lei ^{1, 2, †,} ,
• Tianyu Zhao ^{3, †,} ,
• Kim Hoong Ng ^4, ,
• Yingzhen Zhang ^1, ,
• Xuerui Zang ^5, ,
• Xiao Li ^1, ,
• Weilong Cai ^{1, 2,} ,
• Jianying Huang ^{1, 2,} ,
• Jun Hu ^3, ,
• Yuekun Lai ^{1, 2, ,}

• 1.

  National Engineering Research Center of Chemical Fertilizer Catalyst (NERC-CFC), College of Chemical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China

• 2.

  Qingyuan Innovation Laboratory, Quanzhou 362801, Fujian Province, China

• 3.

  School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710069, China

• 4.

  R & D Center of Biochemical Engineering Technology, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei 24301, Taiwan, China

• 5.

  College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong Province, China

• ^†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author: Yuekun Lai, yklai@fzu.edu.cn

• Received Date: 04 June 2022
  Accepted Date: 29 June 2022
  Revised Date: 28 June 2022
  Available Online: 15 April 2023
• Fund Project:

Abstract: Tungsten carbide (WC) is commonly used as a photocatalytic material for hydrogen production via water reduction. However, it is often combined with an effective photoabsorber to provide sufficient photoactivity. This is attributed to the narrow band gap of WC, which leads to an inadequate redox capability for water reduction. Notably, this limitation was overcome using a novel solid-liquid photocatalytic system that compliments bare WC photocatalysts with liquid-phase photosensitizing erythrosine B (ErB). The proposed concept eliminates the need to couple WC with photoabsorbing semiconductors, which often requires tedious procedures for the proper functionalization of photocatalytic composites. The experimental results indicated significant hydrogen production from the proposed solid-liquid photocatalytic system under irradiation with visible light (λ = 520 nm); however, only in the presence of triethanolamine (TEOA) as a sacrificial reagent. Evidently, a blank experiment with only WC and ErB under typical photoreaction conditions exhibited nearly zero photoactivity and the production of H₂ was undetected. Similarly, nonactivity was observed for the photoreaction in the presence of ErB or WC in the irradiated TEOA solution. These blank experiments confirmed the significance of all three components, namely WC, ErB, and TEOA, which functioned as the photocatalyst, photoabsorber, and sacrificial reagent, respectively, for suitable H₂ production in the proposed system. The effects of three critical parameters, such as pH, ErB concentration, and WC concentration, were systematically investigated. The optimum pH for H₂ production was 8, with a slight variation to more basic or acidic conditions reducing the photoactivity of the system. At pH < 8, part of TEOA undergoes partial protonation, thereby losing its activity as a sacrificial reagent in the photocatalytic system. As the pH increased to > 8, the low proton concentration in the reaction medium perturbed the thermodynamic drive, leading to suppressed H₂ production. The optimum ErB concentration was 1 mmol·L^-1, and decreasing or increasing the ErB concentration from the optimal point was detrimental to H₂ production. The diluted system (ErB concentration < 1 mmol·L^-1) provided insufficient sensitizing agents, whereas the concentrated system (> 1 mmol·L^-1 ErB) induced significant scattering effects that prevent light from penetrating into the reactive liquid phase. Conversely, the WC concentration exhibited a positive correlation with H₂ production in a steady manner, and the highest H₂ production measured by the system was at a WC concentration of 12 mmol·L^-1. Under optimum conditions, 66 μmol∙h^-1 of H₂ was successfully produced, with a slightly higher apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 6.6% at 520 nm, which was attributed to the synergism of ErB-TEOA-WC in the proposed system. The photoelectrochemical evaluation confirmed the positive interactions between ErB, TEOA, and WC, which caused reduced impedance while improving charge utilization in the system. Consequently, an excellent H₂ turnover number (TON) of 15 was achieved with negligible activity decay for at least 20 h of reaction. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirmed the major roles of W- and C-vacant sites in H₂ production, which were attributed to their enhanced product desorption that facilitates high turnover rates during photoreactions. In conclusion, the proposed novel liquid-solid photocatalytic WC/ErB/TEOA system provides more facile photo-derived H₂ energy from water, which circumvents the tedious photoabsorber coupling of metal carbide photocatalysts.

Key words:
• Liquid-phase
•  /  WC
•  /  Erythrosine B
•  /  Triethanolamine
•  /  Photocatalysis
•  /  H₂ production

• 1. [1]

     Ran, J.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (22), 7787. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60425J

  2. [2]

     潘金波, 申升, 周威, 唐杰, 丁洪志, 王进博, 陈浪, 区泽堂, 尹双凤. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905068. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905068Pan, J.; Shen, S.; Zhou, W.; Tang, J.; Ding, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Au, C. T.; Yin, S. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905068. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905068

  3. [3]

     Chen, X.; Shen, S.; Guo, L.; Mao, S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645

  4. [4]

     Song, W.; Ito, A.; Binstead, R. A.; Hanson, K.; Luo, H.; Brennaman, M. K.; Concepcion, J. J.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11587. doi: 10.1021/ja4032538

  5. [5]

     赵娜, 彭静, 王建平, 翟茂林. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2004046. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202004046Zhao, N.; Peng, J.; Wang, J.; Zhai, M. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2004046. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202004046

  6. [6]

     Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Jia, Y.; Chen, X.; Han, H.; Li, C. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9987. doi: 10.1021/cr500008u

  7. [7]

     姜志明, 陈晴, 郑巧清, 沈荣晨, 张鹏, 李鑫. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2010059. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010059Jiang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, R.; Zhang, P.; Li, X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2010059. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010059

  8. [8]

     Zhu, Y.; Wang, T.; Xu, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, C. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 464, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.061

  9. [9]

     Zeng, L.; Dai, C.; Liu, B.; Xue, C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 24217. doi: 10.1039/C9TA10290F

  10. [10]

      Do, J. Y.; Chava, R. K.; Kim, Y. Il; Cho, D. W.; Kang, M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 494, 886. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.227

  11. [11]

      雷卓楠, 马心怡, 胡晓云, 樊君, 刘恩周. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2110049. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202110049Lei, Z.; Ma, X.; Hu, X.; Fan, J.; Liu, E. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2110049. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202110049

  12. [12]

      Sun, Z.; Zheng, H.; Li, J.; Du, P. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2668. doi: 10.1039/C5EE01310K

  13. [13]

      Guo, Y.; Mao, L.; Tang, Y.; Shang, Q.; Cai, X.; Zhang, J.; Hu, H.; Tan, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Yu, T.; Ye, J. Nano Energy 2022, 95, 107028. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107028

  14. [14]

      Hu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yin, Q.; Liu, X.; Jiang, X.; Chen, Z.; Yang, X.; Huang, F.; Cao, Y. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 775. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.027

  15. [15]

      Zubair, M.; Vanhaecke, E. M. M.; Svenum, I. -H.; Rønning, M.; Yang, J. Green Energy Environ. 2020, 5, 461. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2020.10.017

  16. [16]

      张鹏, 王继全, 李源, 姜丽莎, 王壮壮, 张高科. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009102. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009102Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009102. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009102

  17. [17]

      Guo, P.; Xiong, Z.; Yuan, S.; Xie, K.; Wang, H.; Gao, Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 130372. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130372

  18. [18]

      Lin, Z.; Du, C.; Yan, B.; Yang, G. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 5582. doi: 10.1039/C9CY01621J

  19. [19]

      Zhong, W.; Li, W.; Yang, C.; Wu, J.; Zhao, R.; Idrees, M.; Xiang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, X. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 61, 236. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.02.013

  20. [20]

      Li, S.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, A.; Xiao, N.; Gao, Y.; Li, N.; Song, W.; Ge, L.; Liu, J. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 254, 145. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.001

  21. [21]

      Tian, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, J.; Ji, J.; Wang, F. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125554. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125554

  22. [22]

      Xu, X.; Pan, L.; Han, Q.; Wang, C.; Ding, P.; Pan, J.; Hu, J.; Zeng, H.; Zhou, Y. J. Catal. 2019, 374, 237. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.04.043

  23. [23]

      Liu, M. L.; Chen, B. Bin; Li, R. S.; Li, C. M.; Zou, H. Y.; Huang, C. Z. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4154. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00126

  24. [24]

      Chen, S.; Vequizo, J. J. M.; Hisatomi, T.; Nakabayashi, M.; Lin, L.; Wang, Z.; Yamakata, A.; Shibata, N.; Takata, T.; Yamada, T.; et al. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 6436. doi: 10.1039/D0SC01167C

  25. [25]

      Godin, R.; Wang, Y.; Zwijnenburg, M. A.; Tang, J.; Durrant, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5216. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01547

  26. [26]

      Liu, S.; Meng, X.; Adimi, S.; Guo, H.; Qi, W.; Attfield, J. P.; Yang, M. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127307. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127307

  27. [27]

      Guo, F.; Wu, Y.; Ai, X.; Chen, H.; Li, G. -D.; Chen, W.; Zou, X. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 8627. doi: 10.1039/C9CC03638E

  28. [28]

      Zhong, Y.; Xia, X.; Shi, F.; Zhan, J.; Tu, J.; Fan, H. J. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500286. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500286

  29. [29]

      Lei, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Ng, K. H.; Lai, Y. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 129018. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129018

  30. [30]

      Xiao, R.; Zhao, C.; Zou, Z.; Chen, Z.; Tian, L.; Xu, H.; Tang, H.; Liu, Q.; Lin, Z.; Yang, X. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 268, 118382. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118382

  31. [31]

      He, K.; Xie, J.; Liu, Z. -Q.; Li, N.; Chen, X.; Hu, J.; Li, X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13110. doi: 10.1039/C8TA03048K

  32. [32]

      He, K.; Xie, J.; Yang, Z.; Shen, R.; Fang, Y.; Ma, S.; Chen, X.; Li, X. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 1193. doi: 10.1039/c7cy00029d

  33. [33]

      Lei, Y.; Ng, K. H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Huang, J.; Lai, Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 434, 134689. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134689

  34. [34]

      Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; He, X.; Fang, W.; Li, W.; Du, X.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 46598. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c12063

  35. [35]

      Chen, Y.; Yang, D.; Xin, X.; Yang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, Z.; An, K.; Wang, W.; Tan, J.; Jiang, Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 9717. doi: 10.1039/D1TA10270B

  36. [36]

      Humayun, M.; Ullah, H.; Cheng, Z. -E.; Tahir, A. A.; Luo, W.; Wang, C. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2022, 310, 121322. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121322

  37. [37]

      Li, Y.; Yang, L.; He, H.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Fang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, D.; Qi, Y.; Li, Z.; Deng, W. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1355. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29076-z

  38. [38]

      Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Rui, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, X. Green Energy Environ. 2021, 6, 458. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2020.10.013

  39. [39]

      Li, W.; Min, S.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Z. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 116. doi: 10.1039/C9SE00820A

  40. [40]

      Tian, L.; Min, S.; Lei, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, F. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6870. doi: 10.1039/C9CC03230D

  41. [41]

      Zhu, Q.; Qiu, B.; Duan, H.; Gong, Y.; Qin, Z.; Shen, B.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 259, 118078. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118078

  42. [42]

      Wang, P.; Guan, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, J. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 774. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1540-5

  43. [43]

      Zhou, Y.; Hu, W.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Nyakuchena, J.; Duisenova, K.; Lee, S.; Fan, D.; Huang, J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 1405. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09634

  44. [44]

      Kaphan, D. M.; Brereton, K. R.; Klet, R. C.; Witzke, R. J.; Miller, A. J. M.; Mulfort, K. L.; Delferro, M.; Tiede, D. M. Organometallics 2021, 40, 1482. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00133

  45. [45]

      Yue, X.; Yi, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10591. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02655B

•