一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化

引用本文: 王烨, 葛瑞翔, 刘翔, 李敬, 段昊泓. 一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7): 230701. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307019 shu

Citation: Ye Wang, Ruixiang Ge, Xiang Liu, Jing Li, Haohong Duan. An Anion Leaching Strategy towards Metal Oxyhydroxides Synthesis for Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Glycerol[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(7): 230701. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307019 shu

一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化

王烨 ^1, ,
葛瑞翔 ^1, ,
刘翔 ^1, ,
李敬 ^1, ,
段昊泓 ^{1, 2,
,}

1.
清华大学化学系, 北京 100084
2.
清华大学化学系稀土新材料教育部工程研究中心, 北京 100084

通讯作者: 段昊泓, hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

基金项目:
北京市自然科学基金 JQ22003

国家自然科学基金 21978147

国家自然科学基金 21935001

北京市自然科学基金 2214063

摘要: 亲核氧化反应在可持续生产增值化学品中扮演着重要角色。电催化甘油氧化反应作为亲核氧化反应的一种重要类型，可以制得包括甲酸在内的C₁至C₃衍生产物。非贵金属氢氧化物/羟基氧化物被广泛应用于甘油氧化反应，但在中等电位下难以达到工业级电流密度(大于300 mA·cm^-2])。研究表明，氢氧化物/羟基氧化物催化的甘油氧化反应通过间接氧化机理进行, 即通过电生成的含有亲电吸附氧的羟基氧化物氧化亲核试剂(甘油)。因此，理解甘油氧化反应中电催化剂的演变至关重要。在本文中，通过循环伏安法活化钼酸镍(NiMoO₄)，开发了一种钼掺杂的羟基氧化镍(Mo-NiOOH)催化剂。通过多种表征方法对Mo-NiOOH进行了系统表征，结果显示，Mo-NiOOH继承了NiMoO₄前驱体的纳米片阵列形貌，但Mo含量降低，证明循环伏安法活化后实现了从氧化物到羟基氧化物的相重构。此外，Mo-NiOOH中Ni³⁺/Ni²⁺的比例高于循环伏安法活化制备的NiOOH。在活化过程中，Mo物种从NiMoO₄中浸出，制备得到的Mo-NiOOH保留了NiMoO₄前驱体的纳米片阵列形貌。与氢氧化镍(Ni(OH)₂)经循环伏安法活化合成的NiOOH相比，Mo-NiOOH具有更高的电化学比表面积(ECSAs)和更高的Ni³⁺/Ni²⁺比例，且促进了Ni²⁺氧化为Ni³⁺。因此，Mo-NiOOH达到高电流密度(400 mA·cm^-2])的电位(1.51 V vs. RHE)低于NiOOH (1.84 V vs. RHE)。此外，Mo-NiOOH表现出高于NiOOH的甲酸盐法拉第效率(84.7% vs. 59.6%)，表明钼掺杂加速了碳―碳键断裂。多电位阶跃实验显示，NiOOH和Mo-NiOOH催化的甘油电氧化通过类似的羟基氧化物介导的间接氧化机理进行。原位电化学阻抗谱和原位拉曼光谱证实，Mo掺杂促进了甘油氧化反应动力学以及Ni²⁺氧化为Ni³⁺的过程，导致Mo-NiOOH比NiOOH具有更高的活性和甲酸选择性。本研究通过可溶性阴离子浸出策略来调节羟基氧化物表面结构，为设计高性能亲核氧化反应电催化剂提供了指导。

关键词:

English

An Anion Leaching Strategy towards Metal Oxyhydroxides Synthesis for Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Glycerol

1.
Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2.
Engineering Research Center of Advanced Rare Earth Materials (Ministry of Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Corresponding author: Haohong Duan, Email: hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-10-62780648

Received Date: 11 July 2023
Accepted Date: 25 August 2023
Revised Date: 25 August 2023
Available Online: 15 July 2024
Fund Project:
Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China

the National Natural Science Foundation of China

the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, China

Abstract: Nucleophile oxidation reaction (NOR) is emerging as a significant approach for the sustainable production of value-added chemicals. Among the various types, electrocatalytic glycerol oxidation reaction (GOR) stands out as a crucial method for producing C₁ to C₃ chemicals including formic acid (FA). Non-noble-metal-based (oxy)hydroxides have found extensive use in GOR, yet achieving industrially-demanded current densities (> 300 mA·cm^-2]) at moderate potentials remains a challenge. It is well documented that GOR catalyzed by (oxy)hydroxides follows an indirect oxidation mechanism. Specifically, the nucleophile, glycerol, undergoes oxidation by the electrogenerated oxyhydroxides with electrophilic adsorption oxygen. Therefore, comprehending the evolution of the electrocatalyst in GOR is critically important. In this paper, we have developed molybdenum-doped nickel oxyhydroxides (Mo-NiOOH) through cyclic voltammetry (CV) activation of nickel molybdate (NiMoO₄). We demonstrated that Mo species leach from NiMoO₄, and the resulting Mo-NiOOH retains the nanosheet array morphology of NiMoO₄. We subjected the freshly prepared Mo-NiOOH to systematic characterizations employing techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping, Raman spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The above structural characterizations confirm that Mo-NiOOH inherits the nanosheet array morphology of the NiMoO₄ precursor with reduced Mo content, thereby indicating the phase reconstruction from oxides to oxyhydroxides post CV activation. Furthermore, the Ni³⁺/Ni²⁺ ratio in Mo-NiOOH surpasses that in NiOOH derived from CV activation of Ni(OH)₂. Mo-NiOOH exhibits elevated electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs) and a higher Ni³⁺/Ni²⁺ ratio compared to NiOOH obtained through CV activation of Ni(OH)₂, facilitating the Mo-NiOOH exhibits higher ratio of Ni³⁺/Ni²⁺, higher electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs) than NiOOH, and facilitated oxidation of Ni²⁺ to Ni³⁺. Consequently, Mo-NiOOH requires a lower applied potential than NiOOH (1.51 V versus 1.84 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) to achieve a high current density (400 mA·cm^−2]). Additionally, Mo-NiOOH demonstrates higher Faradaic efficiency towards formate (FE_formate) in contrast to NiOOH (84.7% versus 59.6%), indicating enhanced carbon-carbon (C―C) bond cleavage due to Mo doping. Multi-potential step (STEP) experiments indicate that GOR catalyzed by NiOOH and Mo-NiOOH follows a similar indirect oxidation mechanism mediated by oxyhydroxides. Operando electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and in situ Raman spectroscopy confirmed that Mo doping in NiOOH accelerates GOR kinetics and the oxidation of Ni²⁺ to Ni³⁺, contributing to the higher activity and formate selectivity of Mo-NiOOH than NiOOH. The strategy of surface modulation of oxyhydroxides through leaching of soluble anions offers guidelines for the rational design of high-performance NOR electrocatalysts.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Zhou, H.; Li, Z.; Kong, X.; Duan, H. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2020, 41, 1449. doi: 10.7503/cjcu20200212
2. [2]
  Zeng, L.; Chen, Y.; Sun, M.; Huang, Q.; Sun, K.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Tan, H.; Li, M.; Pan, Y.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 17577. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02570
3. [3]
  Wang, T.; Cao, X.; Jiao, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61. doi: 10.1002/anie.202213328
4. [4]
  Wang, F.; Duan, H. Chem Catal. 2022, 2, 644. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.03.014
5. [5]
  Zhou, P.; Zhang, J. Sci. China Chem. 2023, 66, 1011. doi: 10.1007/s11426-022-1511-2
6. [6]
  Sheng, H.; Janes, A. N.; Ross, R. D.; Hofstetter, H.; Lee, K.; Schmidt, J. R.; Jin, S. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 716. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00826-y
7. [7]
  Kwon, Y.; Birdja, Y.; Spanos, I.; Rodriguez, P.; Koper, M. T. M. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 759. doi: 10.1021/cs200599g
8. [8]
  Vo, T. -G.; Ho, P. -Y.; Chiang, C. -Y. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 300, 120723. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120723
9. [9]
  Dai, C.; Sun, L.; Liao, H.; Khezri, B.; Webster, R. D.; Fisher, A. C.; Xu, Z. J. J. Catal. 2017, 356, 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.10.010
10. [10]
  Yan, Y.; Zhou, H.; Xu, S. -M.; Yang, J.; Hao, P.; Cai, X.; Ren, Y.; Xu, M.; Kong, X.; Shao, M.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 6144. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11861
11. [11]
  Morales, D. M.; Jambrec, D.; Kazakova, M. A.; Braun, M.; Sikdar, N.; Koul, A.; Brix, A. C.; Seisel, S.; Andronescu, C.; Schuhmann, W. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 982. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04150
12. [12]
  Wu, J. X.; Liu, X.; Hao, Y. M.; Wang, S. Y.; Wang, R.; Du, W.; Cha, S. S.; Ma, X. Y.; Yang, X. J.; Gong, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202216083. doi: 10.1002/anie.202216083
13. [13]
  Li, Y.; Wei, X.; Han, S.; Chen, L.; Shi, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21464. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107510
14. [14]
  Li, Y.; Wei, X.; Chen, L.; Shi, J.; He, M. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5335. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13375-z
15. [15]
  Fan, L.; Ji, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Chen, K.; Liu, X.; Wen, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 7224. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c13740
16. [16]
  Bulushev, D. A.; Ross, J. R. H. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 821. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201702075
17. [17]
  Govind Rajan, A.; Martirez, J. M. P.; Carter, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3600. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13708
18. [18]
  Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, G.; Wu, C.; Hu, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, R.; Li, Y.; Xiong, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 17458. doi: 10.1002/anie.201910716
19. [19]
  He, J.; Zou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Dong, C. -L.; Lu, X.; Wang, S. Sci. China Chem. 2020, 63, 1684. doi: 10.1007/s11426-020-9844-2
20. [20]
  Liu, B.; Xu, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Decarolis, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gibson, E. K.; Catlow, C. R. A.; Yan, K. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 4034. doi: 10.1039/d1gc00901j
21. [21]
  Goetz, M. K.; Bender, M. T.; Choi, K. -S. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33637-7
22. [22]
  Fu, G.; Kang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Fu, X. -Z.; Zhang, J.; Luo, J. -L.; Liu, J. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 200. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00940-3
23. [23]
  Böhm, D.; Beetz, M.; Kutz, C.; Zhang, S.; Scheu, C.; Bein, T.; Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 10394. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02851
24. [24]
  Zhao, P.; Ma, L.; Guo, J. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 164, 110634. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110634
25. [25]
  Qin, H.; Ye, Y.; Li, J.; Jia, W.; Zheng, S.; Cao, X.; Lin, G.; Jiao, L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 33, 2209698. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202209698
26. [26]
  Wang, F.; Zhang, K.; Li, S.; Zha, Q.; Ni, Y. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 10383. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03166
27. [27]
  Yan, J.; Kong, L.; Ji, Y.; White, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; An, P.; Liu, S.; Lee, S. -T.; Ma, T. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2149. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09845-z
28. [28]
  Chen, W.; Xie, C.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Dong, C. -L.; Huang, Y. -C.; Xiao, Z.; Wei, Z.; Du, S.; Chen, C.; et al. Chem 2020, 6, 2974. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.022
29. [29]
  Bender, M. T.; Lam, Y. C.; Hammes-Schiffer, S.; Choi, K. -S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 21538. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10924
30. [30]
  Zhang, P.; Sun, L. Chin. J. Chem. 2020, 38, 996. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201900467
31. [31]
  Duan, Y.; Lee, J. Y.; Xi, S.; Sun, Y.; Ge, J.; Ong, S. J. H.; Chen, Y.; Dou, S.; Meng, F.; Diao, C.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7418. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015060
32. [32]
  Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, S.; She, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Y.; Williams, T.; Gengenbach, T.; Zu, L.; Mao, H.; et al. Matter 2020, 3, 2124. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.016
33. [33]
  Liu, X.; Meng, J.; Ni, K.; Guo, R.; Xia, F.; Xie, J.; Li, X.; Wen, B.; Wu, P.; Li, M.; et al. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2020, 1, 100241. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100241
34. [34]
  Lin, T. -W.; Dai, C. -S.; Hung, K. -C. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7274. doi: 10.1038/srep07274
35. [35]
  Kuai, C.; Zhang, Y.; Han, L.; Xin, H. L.; Sun, C. -J.; Nordlund, D.; Qiao, S.; Du, X. -W.; Lin, F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 10747. doi: 10.1039/d0ta04244g
36. [36]
  Yang, C.; Wang, H.; Lu, S.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Q.; Liang, D.; Xiang, Y. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 834. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.155
37. [37]
  Kim, J. -H.; Kim, K. J.; Park, M. -S.; Lee, N. J.; Hwang, U.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. -J. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 997. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.06.022
38. [38]
  Gouda, L.; Sévery, L.; Moehl, T.; Mas-Marzá, E.; Adams, P.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Tilley, S. D. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 8061. doi: 10.1039/d1gc02031e
39. [39]
  Liu, B.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Wan, Y.; Yan, K. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 78, 412. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.11.041
40. [40]
  Chen, D.; Ding, Y.; Cao, X.; Wang, L.; Lee, H.; Lin, G.; Li, W.; Ding, G.; Sun, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, e202309478. doi: 10.1002/anie.202309478
41. [41]
  Sun, Y.; Shin, H.; Wang, F.; Tian, B.; Chiang, C. -W.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Tang, L.; Goddard, W. A.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 15185. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05403
42. [42]
  Tao, S.; Wen, Q.; Jaegermann, W.; Kaiser, B. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1508. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04589
43. [43]
  Deabate, S.; Fourgeot, F.; Henn, F. J. Power Sources 2000, 87, 125. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753[99]00437-1
44. [44]
  Zhou, D.; Wang, S.; Jia, Y.; Xiong, X.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, D.; Zheng, L.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 736. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809689
45. [45]
  Solomon, G.; Landström, A.; Mazzaro, R.; Jugovac, M.; Moras, P.; Cattaruzza, E.; Morandi, V.; Concina, I.; Vomiero, A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101324. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101324
46. [46]
  Dürr, R. N.; Maltoni, P.; Tian, H.; Jousselme, B.; Hammarström, L.; Edvinsson, T. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13504. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04126
47. [47]
  王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. 2023, 39, 2301023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202301023Wang, A.; Chen, J.; Zhang, P.; Tang, S.; Feng, Z.; Yao, T.; Li, C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39, 2301023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202301023
48. [48]
  Chen, P.; Cao, C.; Ding, C.; Yin, Z.; Qi, S.; Guo, J.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Z. J. Power Sources 2022, 521, 230920. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230920
49. [49]
  Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Ma, W.; Wan, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, S.; Zheng, J. Y.; Zhou, Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203342. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202203342
50. [50]
  Menezes, P. W.; Yao, S.; Beltrán-Suito, R.; Hausmann, J. N.; Menezes, P. V.; Driess, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 133, 4690. doi: 10.1002/anie.202014331
51. [51]
  Zhong, M.; Hisatomi, T.; Kuang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Liu, M.; Iwase, A.; Jia, Q.; Nishiyama, H.; Minegishi, T.; Nakabayashi, M.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5053. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00256
52. [52]
  Zheng, X.; Cao, Y.; Han, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, X.; Zhong, C.; Hu, W.; Deng, Y. Sci. China Mater. 2019, 62, 1096. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-9413-5
53. [53]
  Owusu, K. A.; Qu, L.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, K.; Yang, C.; Hercule, K. M.; Lin, C.; Shi, C.; Wei, Q.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14264. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14264
54. [54]
  Pang, X.; Bai, H.; Zhao, H.; Fan, W.; Shi, W. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1545. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04880
55. [55]
  Idriss, H. Surf. Sci. 2021, 712, 121894. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2021.121894
56. [56]
  Xiao, Z.; Huang, Y. -C.; Dong, C. -L.; Xie, C.; Liu, Z.; Du, S.; Chen, W.; Yan, D.; Tao, L.; Shu, Z.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12087. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00257
57. [57]
  Ye, F.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, Q.; Long, Y.; Liu, D.; Paul, R.; Fang, Y.; Su, Y.; Qu, L.; Dai, L.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37679-3
58. [58]
  Chen, Y. -Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, T.; Luo, H.; Niu, S.; Dai, Z. -H.; Wan, L. -J.; Hu, J. -S. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703311. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703311
59. [59]
  Kong, X.; Zhang, C.; Hwang, S. Y.; Chen, Q.; Peng, Z. Small 2017, 13, 1700334. doi: 10.1002/smll.201700334
60. [60]
  Deng, X.; Xu, G. Y.; Zhang, Y. J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, J. F.; Fu, X. Z.; Luo, J. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20535. doi: 10.1002/anie.202108955
61. [61]
  刘瑶钰, 王宇辰, 刘碧莹, Mahmoud, A., 严凯. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39, 2205028. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202205028Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Mahmoud, A.; Yan, K. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39, 2205028. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202205028
62. [62]
  Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, B.; Xu, J.; Chen, S.; Rawat, R. S.; Fan, H. J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600221. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600221
63. [63]
  Suen, N. -T.; Hung, S. -F.; Quan, Q.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y. -J.; Chen, H. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 337. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00328a
64. [64]
  Wu, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Ma, X. Y.; Zhang, W. Y.; Hao, Y.; Cai, W. B.; Liu, Z. P.; Gong, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202113362. doi: 10.1002/anie.202113362
65. [65]
  Ge, R.; Li, J.; Duan, H. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 3273. doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2076-y
66. [66]
  Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y. -Q.; Xie, Z.; Xu, S. -M.; Xu, M.; Li, Z.; Ma, L.; Ge, R.; Zhou, H.; Li, Z.; et al. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 12432. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03162
67. [67]
  Ge, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, M.; Xu, S. M.; Zhou, H.; Ji, K.; Chen, F.; Zhou, J.; Duan, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202200211. doi: 10.1002/anie.202200211
68. [68]
  Zhou, P.; Lv, X.; Tao, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Wei, X.; Wang, T.; Zhou, B.; Lu, Y.; Frauenheim, T.; et al. Adv. Mater. 2022, 2204089. doi: 10.1002/adma.202204089
69. [69]
  Xue, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Ge, R.; Yang, J.; Kong, X.; Xu, M.; Li, Z.; Ma, L.; Duan, H. Chin. J. Chem. 2022, 40, 2741. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202200414
70. [70]
  Zhu, Y. -Q.; Zhou, H.; Dong, J.; Xu, S. -M.; Xu, M.; Zheng, L.; Xu, Q.; Ma, L.; Li, Z.; Shao, M.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202219048. doi: 10.1002/anie.202219048
71. [71]
  Zhou, B.; Li, Y.; Zou, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhou, W.; Song, M.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22908. doi: 10.1002/anie.202109211
72. [72]
  Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Xie, C.; Zhou, W.; Huang, Y. C.; Wang, T.; et al. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2105320. doi: 10.1002/adma.202105320
73. [73]
  Wang, H. -Y.; Hung, S. -F.; Chen, H. -Y.; Chan, T. -S.; Chen, H. M.; Liu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 36. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10525
74. [74]
  Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4602. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32443-5
75. [75]
  Tang, L.; Xia, M.; Cao, S.; Bo, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, L.; Deng, D. Nano Energy 2022, 101, 107562. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107562
76. [76]
  Gu, K.; Wang, D.; Xie, C.; Wang, T.; Huang, G.; Liu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Tao, L.; Wang, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20253. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107390
77. [77]
  Wang, S.; Chen, W.; Xu, L.; Zhu, X.; Huang, Y. -C.; Zhou, W.; Wang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Du, S.; Li, Q.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 60, 7297. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015773
78. [78]
  Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4602. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32443-5
79. [79]
  Kuang, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Ren, X.; Ding, J.; Ge, R.; Zhou, W.; Rykov, A. I.; Sougrati, M. T.; et al. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 57, 212. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.09.014
80. [80]
  Xu, J.; Wang, B. -X.; Lyu, D.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2023, 48, 10724. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.118
81. [81]
  Bai, L.; Lee, S.; Hu, X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 3095. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011388
82. [82]
  Lee, S.; Bai, L.; Hu, X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8072. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915803

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 2
文章访问数: 510
HTML全文浏览量: 20

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化

通讯作者: 段昊泓, hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

English

An Anion Leaching Strategy towards Metal Oxyhydroxides Synthesis for Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Glycerol

Corresponding author: Haohong Duan, Email: hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-10-62780648

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化

通讯作者: 段昊泓, hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

English

An Anion Leaching Strategy towards Metal Oxyhydroxides Synthesis for Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Glycerol

Corresponding author: Haohong Duan, Email: hhduan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-10-62780648

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs