固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中苯胺类化合物及基质干扰的消除

引用本文: 赵云芝, 谢振伟, 潘乐丹, 姚欢. 固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中苯胺类化合物及基质干扰的消除[J]. 色谱, 2016, 34(3): 289-298. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2015.11009 shu

Citation: ZHAO Yunzhi, XIE Zhenwei, PAN Ledan, YAO Huan. Determination of aniline derivatives in water by solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and elimination of matrix interference[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2016, 34(3): 289-298. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2015.11009 shu

固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中苯胺类化合物及基质干扰的消除

1.
四川省环境监测总站, 四川成都 610091

通讯作者: 赵云芝

基金项目:
国家环境保护标准项目(2014-34). (2014-34)

摘要: 建立了固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱检测水中18种苯胺类化合物的分析方法,并优化了固相萃取和色谱条件。水样经混合型阳离子交换柱(MCX)或硅胶基体阳离子交换柱(SCX)富集后,用氨水甲醇溶液洗脱,用超纯水适当地稀释后,用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定。以ODS柱为分离柱,甲醇-0.005%(v/v)甲酸水溶液为流动相,梯度洗脱,多反应监测模式分析,内标法定量。18种苯胺类化合物的分析时间在15 min之内。采用MCX柱萃取时,16种苯胺化合物的方法检出限为0.002~0.035 μ g/L,地表水样品的加标回收率为72.5%~92.5%,相对标准偏差为1.4%~9.6%;采用SCX柱萃取时,17种苯胺类化合物的方法检出限为0.013~0.207 μ g/L,地表水样品的加标回收率为66.5%~102%,相对标准偏差为2.4%~13.6%。本实验还考察了消除基质干扰的5种方法,结果表明,调整色谱分离条件是最有效的方法,其次是选择合适的前处理方法。更换离子源、内标法定量和利用基质标准溶液校正也可在一定程度上消除或补偿基质干扰。

关键词:

English

Determination of aniline derivatives in water by solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and elimination of matrix interference

1.
Sichuan Environmental Monitoring Center, Chengdu 610091, China

Corresponding author: 赵云芝

Received Date: 05 November 2015
Fund Project:
国家环境保护标准项目(2014-34).

Abstract: A method was developed for the determination of 18 aniline derivatives (ADs) in water by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) coupled with solid phase extraction. The water sample was enriched by a mixed cation exchange column (MCX) and a silicon substrate cation exchange column (SCX). The column was eluted by ammonia methanol solution. The eluent was concentrated and then diluted with purified water to the appropriate multiple. The separation of ADs was performed on an ODS column, and the mobile phase of methanol-0.005% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution was employed with gradient elution, then the analytes were detected by LC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring mode, with internal standard method for quantitative analysis. The analysis of the 18 ADs was completed in 15 min and the calibration curves showed good linearity. When an MCX was employed for extraction, the method detection limits of the 16 ADs ranged from 0.002 to 0.035 μ g/L, the average recoveries and relative standard deviations of the 16 ADs in surface water were 72.5%-92.5% (n=6) and 1.4%-9.6% (n=6), respectively. When an SCX was employed for extraction, the method detection limits of the 17 ADs ranged from 0.013 to 0.207 μ g/L, and the average recoveries and relative standard deviations of the 17 ADs in surface water were 66.5%-102% (n=6) and 2.4%-13.6% (n=6), respectively. During the development of this method, five elimination methods of matrix interference were studied. The results showed that adjustment of chromatographic separation conditions is the most efficient method, and the selection of appropriate method for sample preparation is the second one. The replacement of ion source, internal standard method and calibration by matrix matched standard solution can eliminate and compensate matrix interference to some extent.

Key words:

solid phase extraction (SPE)
/ liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
/ elimination methods of matrix interference
/ aniline derivatives (ADs)
/ water

1. [1] Xiong J, Qian S, Xie Y H, et al. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 42(1): 93 熊杰, 钱蜀, 谢永洪, 等. 分析化学, 2014, 42(1): 93[1] Xiong J, Qian S, Xie Y H, et al. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 42(1): 93 熊杰, 钱蜀, 谢永洪, 等. 分析化学, 2014, 42(1): 93
2. [2] Chen Y, Hou X L, Liu J, et al. Chemical Research and Application, 2013, 25(12): 1742 陈勇, 侯晓玲, 刘洁, 等. 化学研究与应用, 2013, 25(12): 1742[2] Chen Y, Hou X L, Liu J, et al. Chemical Research and Application, 2013, 25(12): 1742 陈勇, 侯晓玲, 刘洁, 等. 化学研究与应用, 2013, 25(12): 1742
3. [3] Zhao Y Z, Yang P, Qian S. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(5): 508 赵云芝, 杨坪, 钱蜀. 色谱, 2015, 33(5): 508 [3] Zhao Y Z, Yang P, Qian S. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(5): 508 赵云芝, 杨坪, 钱蜀. 色谱, 2015, 33(5): 508
4. [4] Trufilli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, et al. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2011, 30(3): 491 [4] Trufilli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, et al. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2011, 30(3): 491
5. [5] Wang L Q, He L M, Zeng Z L, et al. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2011, 32(6): 321 王立琦, 贺利民, 曾振灵, 等. 质谱学报, 2011, 32(6): 321[5] Wang L Q, He L M, Zeng Z L, et al. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2011, 32(6): 321 王立琦, 贺利民, 曾振灵, 等. 质谱学报, 2011, 32(6): 321
6. [6] Jia Y B, Wang Q Q, Song H F. Military Medical Sciences, 2011, 35(2): 149 贾彦波, 王清清, 宋海峰. 军事医学, 2011, 35(2): 149[6] Jia Y B, Wang Q Q, Song H F. Military Medical Sciences, 2011, 35(2): 149 贾彦波, 王清清, 宋海峰. 军事医学, 2011, 35(2): 149
7. [7] Su M, Ai L F. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2014, 5(2): 511 苏萌, 艾连峰. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2014, 5(2): 511[7] Su M, Ai L F. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2014, 5(2): 511 苏萌, 艾连峰. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2014, 5(2): 511
8. [8] Dams R, Huestis M A, Lambert W E, et al. J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 2003, 14(11): 1290 [8] Dams R, Huestis M A, Lambert W E, et al. J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 2003, 14(11): 1290
9. [9] Marchi I, Viette V, Badoud F, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2010, 1217: 4071 [9] Marchi I, Viette V, Badoud F, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2010, 1217: 4071
10. [10] Yu Y B, Tan P G, Liu Z X, et al. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 41(8): 1259 于彦彬, 谭丕功, 刘宗兴, 等. 分析化学, 2013, 41(8): 1259[10] Yu Y B, Tan P G, Liu Z X, et al. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 41(8): 1259 于彦彬, 谭丕功, 刘宗兴, 等. 分析化学, 2013, 41(8): 1259
11. [11] Gong L P, Shi F, Jiang S Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(4): 408 巩丽萍, 石峰, 姜树银, 等. 色谱, 2015, 33(4): 408 [11] Gong L P, Shi F, Jiang S Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(4): 408 巩丽萍, 石峰, 姜树银, 等. 色谱, 2015, 33(4): 408
12. [12] Chen Y, Zhu J, Yu Z S, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2012, 30(11): 1148 陈跃, 朱军, 于忠山, 等. 色谱, 2012, 30(11): 1148[12] Chen Y, Zhu J, Yu Z S, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2012, 30(11): 1148 陈跃, 朱军, 于忠山, 等. 色谱, 2012, 30(11): 1148
13. [13] HJ 168-2010[13] HJ 168-2010
14. [14] Rogatsky E, Stein D. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 2005, 16(11): 1757 [14] Rogatsky E, Stein D. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 2005, 16(11): 1757
15. [15] Eeckhaut A V, Lanckmans K, Sarre S, et al. J Chromatogr B, 2009, 877(23): 2198 [15] Eeckhaut A V, Lanckmans K, Sarre S, et al. J Chromatogr B, 2009, 877(23): 2198

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 1
文章访问数: 412
HTML全文浏览量: 7

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中苯胺类化合物及基质干扰的消除

通讯作者: 赵云芝

English

Determination of aniline derivatives in water by solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and elimination of matrix interference

Corresponding author: 赵云芝

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

固相萃取/液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中苯胺类化合物及基质干扰的消除

通讯作者: 赵云芝

English

Determination of aniline derivatives in water by solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and elimination of matrix interference

Corresponding author: 赵云芝

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs