不同金属改性HZSM-5催化剂的甲醇羰基化反应性能

迪丽努尔·艾力 高希然 毕坤豪 方亚平 樊星 艾沙·努拉洪

引用本文: 迪丽努尔·艾力, 高希然, 毕坤豪, 方亚平, 樊星, 艾沙·努拉洪. 不同金属改性HZSM-5催化剂的甲醇羰基化反应性能[J]. 无机化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 901-912. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2022.082 shu
Citation:  Aili Dilinuer, Xi-Ran GAO, Kun-Hao BI, Ya-Ping FANG, Xing FAN, Nulahong Aisha. Performance of Different Metal-Modified HZSM-5 Catalysts for Methanol Carbonylation[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2022, 38(5): 901-912. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2022.082 shu

不同金属改性HZSM-5催化剂的甲醇羰基化反应性能

    通讯作者: 艾沙·努拉洪, E-mail:aisa705@163.com
  • 基金项目:

    新疆维吾尔自治区重点实验室开放课题 2017D04005

    国家自然科学基金 21563028

摘要: 以具有酸性特性的HZSM-5分子筛为载体,结合金属本身具有的羰基化活性,可以更好的提高羰基化反应效率。采用负压沉积沉淀法对HZSM-5催化剂进行Pt、Pd、Cu、Au、Zn改性,制备不同酸度的催化剂。利用X射线衍射、NH3程序升温脱附、吡啶吸附FTIR、N2吸附-脱附和X射线荧光分析研究了不同金属对催化剂物理化学性质及不同负载型HZSM-5催化剂对甲醇羰基化产物的分布和产率的影响。结果表明,不同金属的引入对HZSM-5催化剂的比表面积、孔径和孔体积影响较小,但明显地改变了催化剂表面的酸强度。Pt、Au、Zn和Cu改性后的催化剂更有利于甲醇羰基化反应的进行,其中Cu/HZSM-5催化剂在400 ℃的甲醇转化率高达90.2%,比HZSM-5催化剂的甲醇转化率高12%,但目标产物的选择性比Pt/HZSM-5及Au/HZSM-5的低。总的来看,金属的引入改变了催化剂表面Br-nsted酸(B酸)和Lewis酸(L酸)中心的数量,甲醇的转化率随总酸量的增加而增加,催化剂表面B酸与L酸的比例在0.3~0.5时,催化剂表现出更好的羰基化作用。

English

  • Methanol is an essential and versatile platform chemical in the petrochemical industry, whose main sources are refined liquefied gas, FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) liquefied gas, and oil field gas[1]. In industrial production, methyl acetate and methyl formate are produced by methanol liquid phase carbonylation and gasphase carbonylation, as important organic raw material intermediates with low toxicity. Esters are often used as extraction solvents and are widely used in textile, spice, food, and pharmaceutical industries[2-3]. The synthesis of methyl acetate and methyl formate by methanol carbonylation is divided into liquid phase and gas phase carbonylation. In references[4-6], the synthesis of acetic acid, methyl formate, and methyl acetate by methanol liquid carbonylation was studied. RhCl3· 3H2O, sodium methoxide, potassium methoxide, and Fe-Co cluster compounds were used as catalysts, respectively. Due to the low activity of the catalyst, the active component, such as CH3I, I2, or HI should be introduced as co-catalysts. The disadvantages of this method are that the catalyst and product are difficult to separate, and the introduced iodide will seriously corrode the equipment. The commonly used catalysts for the synthesis of acetic acid, methyl formate, and methyl acetate by methanol gas-phase carbonylation were SnO2-MoO3, V-Ti-O, ReOx/CeO2, Fe2O3/SiO2, RuOx/ZrO2, Au, Pd, Pt, etc. The product of this method is easy to separate, but low carbonylation of methanol[7-10]. In summary, the reaction system of methanol carbonylation to form methyl acetate and methyl formate has changed from initial liquid phase carbonylation to gas-phase carbonylation, and the reaction conditions have changed from high-pressure reaction to low-pressure reaction, which shows that the process is continuously optimized and progressed. In terms of catalysts, the Rh-I and/or Ir-I catalytic system initially used in the liquid phase uses methyl iodide as a promoter; then uses sodium methoxide and metals as catalysts, but the conversion rate is relatively low and requires high-pressure reaction conditions to proceed; later, metal cluster-type compounds are used as catalysts, but the synthesis of catalysts in this method is relatively difficult, and industrial applications are difficult to achieve. In the gas phase carbonylation, Ni, Cu, Pt, Pd were also used as catalysts supported on activated carbon. The catalysts use the activity of the metal itself and the high specific surface area of the carrier (activated carbon, AC) to perform catalytic reactions, but still, need to add methyl iodide used as a co-catalyst to promote a better synergistic reaction between the metal and the support. However, the AC support itself does not have any chemical properties, so this study uses the acidic HZSM-5 molecular sieve as the support, combined with the carbonylation activity of the metal itself, which could improve the efficiency of the carbonylation reaction.

    Based on the low activity of the previous catalysts, Ni and Pt supported on catalysts, such as activated carbon, have been developed[11]. Although this catalyst improves methanol conversion rate and has higher catalytic activity, there are still some difficulties in the separation of products and catalysts. In addition, the formation of coke leads to rapid catalyst deactivation, therefore the catalyst acidity is weak. It is necessary to continuously add an appropriate amount of iodized physicochemical auxiliaries to maintain a low-temperature activity during the reaction. It is urgent to develop new and efficient catalysts for methanol carbonylation. HZSM-5 nanocatalysts, with a special pore structure and a large number of mesopores, are beneficial to the diffusion of reactants and products during methanol carbonylation and the combination of reaction intermediates with active sites on the catalyst. In addition, large surface area, pore structure, and secondary pore structure are more favorable to enhance the activity of carbonylation and the carbon capacity of the catalyst. HZSM-5 surface distribution has Brønsted acid (B acid) and Lewis acid (L acid) centers, which is beneficial to the high selectivity of ethyl acetate and methyl acetate. The study found that HZSM-5 carbonylation activity increases after metal modification, due to the metal center regulating the acid strength and acid quantity distribution of B acid and L acid active sites on the catalyst surface[12-15]. Aisha[16] modified the HZSM-5 catalyst with Au and Pt metals, which increased the number of L acid sites on the surface of the catalyst and decreased the number of B acid sites, and promoted butane aromatization and methanol carbonylation.

    Zeolites with well-defined pores have been extensively used in the fields of petroleum and petrochemistry for their shape selectivity, high acidity, and favorable thermal/hydrothermal stability. Transitional metal catalysis plays an important role in the production of chemicals and fuels. Supported single-metal-site catalysts are well known for their 100% atom utilization efficiency, uniformly isolated active sites, and well-defined coordination environment. As a classic homogeneous catalytic process, methanol carbonylation for acetic acid production has been industrialized by Monsanto using [Rh(CO)2I2]-catalyst[17-20]. However, a large amount of water is required to prevent the formation of a RhI3 precipitate. Recent work on metal modification of HZSM-5 catalysts demonstrated that different metals can promote methanol conversion rate, in which the dispersion degree of active metal plays a determining role in the catalytic performance in various reactions. In previous study, Cu/HZSM-5 catalysts showed a highly elevated catalytic activity and stability in the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate via the oxidative carbonylation of methanol[21]. Other metals have also been used in the modified catalysts of methanol carbonylation, such as Rh[22], Ir-La[23], Zn[24].

    This study focuses on the conceptual design of a novel low-energy sustainable process for acetic acid manufacturing by methanol carbonylation. HZSM-5 modified with Pt, Pd, Cu, Au, Zn by wet impregnation method were denoted as M/HZSM-5 (M=Pt, Pd, Cu, Au, Zn), which were used in methanol carbonylation reaction to access ester products. Carbonylation of HZSM-5 catalysts modified by different metals was studied using a continuous reaction device with a fixed bed of U-type reaction tubes.

    Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 28%) and sodium aluminate (NaAlO2, 98%) were purchased from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3, 45%) was purchased from Xi'an Chemical Reagent Factory. Deionized water was made in the laboratory. The metal precursors support, including Cu(NO3)2, Au(NO3)2, Pt(NO3)2, and so on, were obtained from Hongyan Reagent Factory, Hedong District, Tianjin. All other reagents were analytically pure.

    In a typical synthesis, a certain quality of NaAlO2 was dissolved in the 3 mL tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAH) solution. TEOS solution (4.5 mL) and deionized water (30 mL) were added into a mixed solution with stirring for 2 h. The mixture was added to the Teflon-lined autoclave and crystallized at 170 ℃ for 48 h statically. The mixture was filtered and washed with deionized water to a pH value between 7 and 8. Then the product was dried at 120 ℃ for 12 h, heated to 540 ℃, and calcined for 8 h to get white powders.

    The ZSM-5 molecular sieve was ion-exchanged with a NH4NO3 solution (0.4 mol·L-1, 3 h). Then, it was washed with deionized water, dried at 110 ℃ for 12 h. After the ammonium exchange was completed, the catalyst was calcined for 5 h in air at 560 ℃ in order to obtain HZSM-5. The liquid-solid ratio of the catalyst to NH4NO3 solution was 1∶5. The number of exchanges was 1-5 times. The catalyst (2 g) was soaked in HNO3 solution (0.6 mol·L-1) with five times the catalyst mass for 24 h for acid expansion treatment. Then it was washed with distilled water, and dried at 100 ℃ for 12 h, and calcined at 540 ℃ for 3 h.

    HZSM-5 (1 g) was added into 50 mL 0.1 mol·L-1 M(NO3)x aqueous solution (Mx+=Pt2+, Pd2+, Cu2+, Au+, Zn2+) and the mixture was stirred (200 r·min-1) at 25 ℃ for 30 min. After the ion exchange, the M/HZSM-5 was obtained by centrifugation. Then the catalysts were centrifuged and washed three times using pure water to remove redundant metal cations. After drying at 60 ℃ for 10 h, the samples were calcined at 540 ℃ for 3 h to obtain final catalysts. For convenience, the parent catalyst was designated as HZSM-5. The catalysts modified with Pt, Pd, Cu, Au, and Zn by the wet impregnated method were named M/HZSM-5 (M=Pt, Pd, Cu, Au, Zn).

    The Si/Al ratio (nSiO2/nAl2O3) of the sample was determined using the SRF 3400 X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer of Bruker Company, Germany. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Rigaku D/max-2400 diffractometer (D8-Focus, Germany) equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ= 0.154 18 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA) in a 2θ range of 4°-80° at a scanning rate of 8 (°)·min-1. The types of acids in the catalysts were characterized by pyridine adsorption FTIR (Py-FTIR) spectra were recorded using a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Germany). To study the acidity property, temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) was performed using a TP-5076 chemical adsorption instrument (Tianjin Xianquan Co., Ltd., China). The physical adsorption of nitrogen for the metal catalysts was determined by using an ASAP2020 physical adsorption instrument of American Micromeritics Company. The textural properties of the catalysts were determined by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. Before the measurement, the samples were degassed under a high vacuum for 3 h at 300 ℃.

    The methanol conversion rate was performed in a fixed-bed flow reactor operated at atmospheric pressure (Fig. 1). The catalyst (100 mg, 40-60 mesh) was loaded in the reactor at 150 ℃, and the temperature was increased stably to 400 ℃, then the methanol was pumped into the reactor. The gaseous products were analyzed on a Beijing 2HD2008 Chromatograph fitted with thermal conductivity detector and flame ionization detector. The catalytic activity and selectivity were expressed by the conversion rate of methanol and the selectivity of methyl acetate.

    图 1

    图 1.  Diagram of mini-scale pulse reactor
    2.1.1   Chemical composition of different metal modified HZSM-5 catalysts

    Table 1 shows the chemical composition of oxides of as-synthesized zeolite and as-synthesized M/HZSM-5. The synthesized HZSM-5 zeolite showed a high mass fraction of SiO2 and a high Si/Al ratio. The loading rate of different metals for M/HZSM-5 was about 90%, and the Si/Al ratio was about 30. The ratio of measured value of Au, Pt, Pd, Zn, Cu content to the theoretical value was more than 90%, and the metal loading rate of the active component was higher. Moreover, the error of metal loading was less than 10%, which has little effect on the shape selectivity of the catalyst pore.

    表 1

    表 1  XRF measurement results of different metal modified HZSM-5 catalysts*
    下载: 导出CSV
    Result HZSM-5 Au/HZSM-5 Pt/HZSM-5 Pd/HZSM-5 Zn/HZSM-5 Cu/HZSM-5
    wAl2O3 / % 3.45 3.35 3.64 3.35 3.41 3.09
    wSiO2 /% 95.68 94.50 95.62 94.50 95.39 95.28
    Actual loading / % 100 100 100 100 100
    Metal loading / % 90 95 91 93 95
    * Metal mass fraction of the supported metal catalyst sample prepared by the negative pressure deposition precipitation method was 1%.
    2.1.2   XRD analysis

    The XRD patterns of all the samples are shown in Fig. 2a. A set of typical diffraction peaks (2θ=7°-9° and 23°-25°) corresponding to an MFI framework were clearly identified on all the samples, indicating that the MFI structure are wellmaintained after the Au, Pt, Zn, Cu, Pd modification. Metal phases were not detected, which indicates that the metal Au, Pt, Zn, Cu, Pd are dispersed in the HZSM-5 catalyst. After metal modification, the intensity of peaks at low angles (2θ =7.8°, 8.7°) slightly increased, and there was no significant change at high angles, indicating the decrease of crystallinity of the catalyst after metal modification[24].

    图 2

    图 2.  (a) XRD patterns of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5; (c) NH3-TPD curves of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5
    2.1.3   Textural characteristic analysis by nitrogen physical absorption

    The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the textural properties of all the samples are presented in Fig. 2b and Table 2, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2b, the typical type Ⅳ adsorption isotherms and H3 type hysteresis loops[14] have been found for M/HZSM-5, where the N2 adsorption and desorption increased rapidly at p/p0 < 0.05 and p/p0>0.8. At the same time, when p/p0>0.8, the parent catalyst was microporous mesoporous composite multistage zeolite whether before and after modification. The micropores are the inner channels of the catalyst, and the mesopores are produced by the accumulation of crystals between the catalysts.

    表 2

    表 2  Textural properties of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5
    下载: 导出CSV
    Sample SBETa / (m2·g-1) Smicb / (m2·g-1) Sextc / (m2·g-1) Vtd / (cm2·g-1) Vmese / (cm2·g-1) Vmicf /(cm2·g-1) Dg / nm
    HZSM-5 357 256 119 0.25 0.14 0.10 3.33
    Pt/HZSM-5 352 245 108 0.30 0.17 0.13 3.27
    Pd/HZSM-5 311 219 103 0.19 0.11 0.07 3.30
    Zn/HZSM-5 345 223 123 0.24 0.14 0.09 3.53
    Au/HZSM-5 321 225 96 0.21 0.12 0.09 3.21
    Cu/HZSM-5 351 238 114 0.24 0.14 0.10 3.34
    a Specific surface area calculated using BET method; b Measured by t-plot method; c Sext=SBET-Smic; d Single point desorption total pore volume of pores with diameter less than 40.312 2 nm at p/p0=0.95; e Vmes=Vt+Vmic; f t-Plot micropore volum; g Average pore diameter.

    As listed in Table 2, the BET specific surface areas (SBET) of all the modified samples decreased slightly compared with that of the parent sample, and there was no significant difference in pore volume. For Pd/HZSM-5, the SBET decreased from 357 to 311 m2·g-1, and the pore volume decreased from 0.25 to 0.19 cm3·g-1. The major suppression of the SBET and Vt in Pd/ HZSM-5 might be due to the restricted structural collapse of the Si framework[13]. Moreover, the pore size of all the samples maintained stability. The change of textural properties was not obvious after modification. So, the Au, Pt, Zn, Cu, and Pd are highly dispersed on the internal, external, and channels of HZSM-5, as proven by XRD. In addition, the microporous surface area (Smic) decreased faster than the external surface area (Sext) compared with the parent catalyst, indicating that the metals are highly dispersed on the microporous channels of HZSM-5. The micropore volume (Vmic) distributed between 0.11 and 0.17 cm3·g-1, accounting for more than 60% of the total pore volume, which indicates that there are more mesopores in the metal modified catalysts. The Vmic of M/HZSM-5 had no significant change compared with the parent sample, accounting for 40% of the total pore volume.

    2.1.4   Acidity analysis by NH3-TPD and Py-FTIR

    NH3-TPD analysis was performed in a temperature range of 50 to 700 ℃ to investigate the acidity of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 (Fig. 2c and Table 3). All the samples exhibited two main peaks in the ranges of 230-270 ℃ and 400-450 ℃, which are ascribed to the weak and strong acid sites, respectively. The active sites of strong and medium-strong acids in the catalyst promote the formation of high-temperature peaks, and the active sites of weak acids and metal oxides in the catalyst promote the formation of low-temperature peaks[15]. In the case of the parent HZSM-5, the mainly NH3 desorption peaks were concentrated at 250 ℃. In contrast, the weak acid site of the modified sample shifted to 276 ℃, indicating that the adsorption capacity for NH3 is enhanced and the surface acid strength is increased. In a word, after metal modification, the acid strength of the strong acid center of the catalyst is reduced, and the weak acid strength is enhanced, forming more medium strong acid centers. This change might improve the conversion rate of methanol.

    表 3

    表 3  Deconvolution of NH3-TPD profiles for all the samples
    下载: 导出CSV
    Sample Temperature / C Relative peak intensity of acid site
    Weak peak Strong peak Weak acid Medium acid Strong acid Total acid
    HZSM-5 251 441 2 643.00 1 082.01 1 679.66 5 404.69
    Au/HZSM-5 266 426 2 027.50 1 113.76 1 203.28 4 344.56
    Zn/HZSM-5 266 431 2 801.57 1 150.20 1 112.70 4 764.48
    Pt/HZSM-5 271 416 2 376.50 1 244.19 1 484.86 5 405.57
    Pd/HZSM-5 236 416 1 609.58 1 489.09 2 370.16 5 468.83
    Cu/HZSM-5 276 416 2 115.11 1 329.80 1 556.18 4 971.10

    Table 3 and Fig. 2c reveal the slight shift in peak position for the synthesized samples. The corresponding peak areas with weak acidity strength and strong acidity strength decreased, implying the weak alkalinity. The Au, Pt, Zn, Cu, and Pd elements act on the weak acid centers of the catalyst and reduce the number of weak acid centers of the catalyst. The modified zeolite sample showed a reduction in its total acidity compared to the parent HZSM-5, due to the elimination of Si or Al atoms from the zeolite framework[16].

    Py-FTIR analysis was performed to further identify types of acid sites on the catalysts (Fig. 3). In general, the peaks of M/HZSM-5 distributed in the region of 1 700-1 400 cm-1. The peak located at 1 446-1 457 cm-1 is attributed to pyridine adsorption of L acid sites, and another peak at 1 540-1 550 cm-1 is ascribed to pyridine adsorption over B acid sites[17]. Furthermore, the appearance of the peak at 1 490 cm-1 is associated with the interactions of pyridine with both B and L acid sites[18]. Fig. 3 illustrate Py-FTIR spectra of the catalysts at different temperatures. All spectra showed similar structural features for all the samples. In addition, other peaks appeared near 1 640 and 1 620 cm-1, which points out that both 1 610 and 1 635 cm-1 are characteristic peaks of pyridine cations[19]. The two peaks can be classified as B acid sites. In addition, this consequence is well consistent with the XRD results in Fig. 2a, indicating that the HZSM-5 framework remains intact after metal impregnation. The intensity caused by B acid sites significantly decreased after the loading of metal on HZSM-5. The L acid sites next to B acid sites increased the acid strength, which is consistent with the NH 3-TPD results and corresponds to the interactions between metal species and H+ of HZSM-5[20]. For HZSM-5 catalysts after metal impregnation, the metal could combine with silicon hydroxyl groups in catalysts and form Si—O(H)—X structure[21]. The metalmodified zeolites exhibited favorable selectivity and activity on methanol carbonylation. For the impregnation of Zn, the reduction of B acid site density and the high Lewis acidity indicate the existence of extraframework cation Zn species, occupying the charge compensation positions instead of the original protons presenting in the Zn-free zeolite. This would be in agreement with previous reference[24] that different extra framework Zn species are suggested such as [Al—O—Zn—O—Zn—O—Al] or [Al—O—Zn—O—Al], acting as L acid sites. The reference[25] proposed that Zn/HZSM-5 sample exhibits a significant decrease in the number of B acid groups (Si(OH)Al) on the modification with Zn, suggesting the consumption of zeolite protons in the exchange process. Moreover, the modification led to the disappearance of the internal silanol groups. El-Malki et al[26] proposed that this is due to the interaction between internal SiOH groups and Zn(OH)+ cations located in the cation positions of zeolite, leading to the formation of (ZO)—Zn—O—Si:

    $ \left( {{\rm{ZO}}} \right)-{\rm{Zn}}{\left( {{\rm{OH}}} \right)^ + } + {\rm{HO}}-{\rm{Si }} \to {\rm{ }}\left( {{\rm{ZO}}} \right)-{\rm{Zn}}-{\rm{O}}-{\rm{Si}} $

    图 3

    图 3.  Py-FTIR spectra of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts at (a) 150 ℃, (b) 300 ℃, and (c) 450 ℃

    Because of the formation of external Zn—OH groups on ZnO clusters. The FTIR spectra of pyridine adsorbed on the modified samples also point to the consumption of B acid sites after modification and indicate the formation of L acid sites induced by the presence of metal ions, which is proven by the appearance of the intensive band at 1 455 cm-1. To investigate the specific changes in the Brønsted and the Lewis acidity of the catalysts, the ratio of peak intensity at 1 540 and 1 450 cm-1 was considered as a value to compare the relative amount (NB, NL) of B and L acid sites in the samples (Table 4). The ratio of B and L acid sites (NB/NL) increased and the total acid sites (NB+NL) decreased with the increase of temperature. Moreover, the acidity of B and L acid sites was weaker at lower temperatures and stronger at higher temperatures. The reason is that metals have broader implications for the L acid sites[27].

    表 4

    表 4  B and L acid sites of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts at different temperatures
    下载: 导出CSV
    Sample 150 ℃ 300 ℃ 450 ℃
    NL NB NB/NL NB+NL NL NB NB/NL NB+NL NL NB NB/NL NB+NL
    HZSM-5 6.54 4.23 0.65 10.77 2.39 1.80 0.76 4.19 1.15 0.82 0.71 1.97
    Au/HZSM-5 5.86 2.31 0.39 8.17 3.36 1.42 0.42 4.78 1.19 0.64 0.54 1.83
    Zn/HZSM-5 5.78 2.39 0.41 8.17 2.82 1.29 0.46 4.11 1.26 0.61 0.48 1.87
    Pt/HZSM-5 9.70 2.64 0.27 12.34 4.81 1.57 0.33 6.37 1.83 0.77 0.42 2.60
    Pd/HZSM-5 3.37 0.59 0.18 3.96 1.39 0.28 0.20 1.66 0.99 0.23 0.23 0.76
    Cu/HZSM-5 13.33 4.51 0.34 17.85 6.26 3.07 0.49 9.33 3.18 1.60 0.50 4.78
    2.1.5   Performance evaluation of methanol to ester over modified zeolite

    The introduction of different metals has little effect on the surface area, pore size, and pore volume of the HZSM-5 catalyst, but it changes the acid center strength and acid quantity on the surface of the catalyst and acts on the methanol carbonylation system. The methanol carbonylation reaction was carried out with HZSM-5 and metal-modified HZSM-5 catalysts at atmospheric pressure and reaction temperature from 150 to 400 ℃. The reaction steps are as follows:

    $ {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH}} + {\rm{CO }} \to {\rm{ HCOOC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}} $

    (1)

    $ {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH + CO}} \to {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{COOH}} $

    (2)

    $ {\rm{2C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH}} \to {\rm{HCOOC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ + 2}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}}} $

    (3)

    $ {\rm{2C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH}} \to {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ + }}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}} $

    (4)

    $ {\rm{2C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH + CO}} \to {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{COOC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ + }}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}}} $

    (5)

    $ n{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}} \to {{\rm{C}}_{\rm{2}}} \to {{\rm{C}}_{\rm{3}}} \to {{\rm{C}}_{\rm{4}}} $

    (6)

    $ {\rm{HCOOC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ + C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{OH}} \to {\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{COOC}}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ + }}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}} $

    (7)

    Fig. 4a shows the relationship between temperature and methanol conversion rate (XCH3OH). The XCH3OH increased with reaction temperature. The order of XCH3OH for the catalysts is as follows: Cu/HZSM-5 > Pt/HZSM-5 > Au/HZSM-5 > Zn/HZSM-5 > HZSM-5 > Pd/HZSM-5. The methanol conversion of Cu/HZSM-5 was as high as 90.3% at 400 ℃, which is 10% higher than that of the unmodified catalyst. Fig. 4b shows the relationship between the XCH3OH at 300 ℃ and the NB+ NL. The conversion of methanol increased with the total acid sites of B acid and L acid. Cu/HZSM-5 had more B and L acid sites, with a maximum conversion of 85% at 300 ℃. The minimum conversion was only 47.9% for Pd/HZSM-5 with minimum B and L acid sites. The results show that the more sum value of B acid and L acid for metal modified HZSM-5 catalyst, the higher the methanol conversion rate is.

    图 4

    图 4.  Performance of methanol to ester over HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5: (a) XCH3OH at different temperatures; (b) relationship between NB+NL and XCH3OH at 300 ℃; (c) YMC+MF (Inset) and SMC+MF at different temperatures; (d) relationship between NB /NL and SMC+MF at 300 ℃; (e) Yby-products (Inset) and Sby-products at different temperatures; (f) Yalkanes (Inset) and Salkanes at different temperatures

    MC=methyl acetate, MF=methyl formate

    The carbonylation selectivity (the selectivity of methyl acetate and methyl formate, SMC+MF) for HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts is shown in Fig. 4b. The yield (Inset) and selectivity of carbonylation products gradually increased with the increase of temperature, reaching a maximum at 300 ℃. In particular, Pt/HZSM-5 had better selectivity (80.8%) than other samples, which increased by 25% compared with the unmodified catalyst. The yield and selectivity of methyl formate and methyl acetate decreased when the temperature rised to 350 ℃, because methyl acetate and methyl formate decompose to generate CO and H2 at higher temperatures[29]. Therefore, the carbonylation activity of M/HZSM-5 catalysts decreases as follows: Pt>Au>Cu>Zn>Pd. Combined with Fig. 4d, it could be concluded that the SMC+MF decreased with the increase of NB/NL at a higher temperature, indicating that the carbonylation activity of methanol decreased with the increase of NB/ NL. However, it doesn't mean that a lower NB/NL is beneficial to the reaction. For the impregnation of Pd, the minimum NB/NL of Pd/HZSM-5 was 0.18, and the selectivity of Pd/HZSM-5 was as low as 55%. In a system where methanol is converted to methyl acetate and formate, methanol is dehydrogenated at the B acid center to generate CH3O, CH3+, and CH2O groups, then CH3O and CH3+ polymerize at the metal-L acid center to form methyl formate and methyl acetate, indicating that B acid and L acid have a synergistic effect on acid methyl formate and methyl acetate[28]. In a word, a low NB/NL value is not conducive to the carbonylation reaction. Among all the samples, the NB/NL around 0.3 -0.5 can obtain a higher catalyst activity for carbonylation.

    Fig. 4e shows the yield of by-products (Yby-products) the selectivity of by-products (Sby-products) in methanol carbonylation over HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts from 150 to 400 ℃, and Fig. 4f shows the yield of alkanes (Yalkanes) and the selectivity of alkanes (Salkanes) in methanol carbonylation over HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts from 150 to 400 ℃. The by-products mainly included methyl ether, acetic acid, dry gas, and alkanes. Olefins and aromatics were also observed with the increase in temperature. The catalyst will not cause coking and deactivation under high-temperature conditions. Choosing the correct metal to support the catalyst is necessary. When the reaction temperature of methanol carbonylation is too high, the selectivity of the target product will be reduced, and the reaction temperature should be controlled at about 300 ℃.

    Fig. 5 shows the carbonylation of methanol by the catalyst with B acid center and L acid center. The modified metal is activated on HZSM-5 to generate metal active sites Si—O(H)—X—Al[30-36] as shown in Fig. 6. Then methanol is dehydrogenated at the B acid center (Si—O(H) —Al) and metal-L acid center to generate CH3+ and CH3O groups. CH3O is further dehydrogenated at the B acid center to form CH2O, undergoing a coupled dehydrogenation reaction at the center of metal L acid to form methyl formate. Methanol is easily decomposed into CO and H2. After activation, CO at the metal active center reacts with CH3 to form intermediates CH3C[O]+ and then intermediates with CH3O to form methyl acetate. After methanol dehydration, methyl can also react with methanol to form dimethyl ether, while dimethyl ether is dehydrated on Si—O(H) —Al acid to form alkanes and further dehydrogenates to form chain alkanes[37-47]. It is precise because of the interaction between the supported metal and the HZSM-5 catalyst that a metal active center is generated, which can better promote the conversion of methanol and obtain more target products.

    图 5

    图 5.  Conversion of methanol to methyl acetate and ethyl acetate

    图 6

    图 6.  Metal activation process on HZSM-5

    A series of M/HZSM-5 catalysts modified with different metals were prepared and examed for methanol carbonylation to generate methyl acetate and methyl formate. Compared to other catalysts, Pt/HZSM-5 facilitated the yield and selectivity of methyl acetate and methyl formate under the same condition. The selectivity order of the metal-modified catalyst to methyl formate and methyl acetate is listed as follows: Pt>Au>Cu>Zn>Pd. The reason is that the catalyst decreases the B acid center and increases the L acid center after Pt modification, which has a lower NB/NL value. Pd has amounts of strong acid centers in NH3-TPD, thereby inhibiting the conversion rate of methanol. Furthermore, the conversion rate of methanol increased at a higher temperature. The yield of the carbonylation product is higher at 300 ℃ but drops significantly at 350 and 400 ℃. Cu/HZSM-5 has more B and L acid sites than other samples, inducing a favorable conversion rate.


    1. [1]

      Cheung P, Bhan A, Sunley G J, Iglesia E. Selective Carbonylation of Dimethyl Ether to Methyl Acetate Catalyzed by Acidic Zeolites[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 45(10):  17-20.

    2. [2]

      章江洪. 甲醇羰基化制甲酸甲酯的研究. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2001: 4-6ZHANG J H. A Study on the Carbonylation of Methanol to Methyl Formate. Kunmig: Kunming University of Since and Technology, 2001: 4-6

    3. [3]

      Brownstein A. BP Chemicals Reveals Effective Alternative Acetic Acid Production[J]. Eur. Chem. News, 1998, 69(1838):  29.

    4. [4]

      Doyle G. Conversion of Methanol to Methyl Acetate Using Iron-Cobalt Catalyst: US4408069 A. 1983-10-04.

    5. [5]

      Tison Y, Lagoute J, Repain V, Chacon C, Girard Y, Rousset S, Joucken F, Sharma D, Henrard L, Amara H, Ghedjatt A, Ducastelle F. Electronic Interaction between Nitrogen Atoms in Doped Graphene[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(1):  670-678. doi: 10.1021/nn506074u

    6. [6]

      Rojas A, Cubillos J, Martinez J, Guerrero D, Reyes P. Effect of the Activation Method on Activity of Supported Platinum Catalysts for Hydrogenation of m-Dinitrobenzene to m-Phenylenediamine[J]. Curr. Org. Chem., 2012, 16(23):  2770-2773. doi: 10.2174/138527212804546868

    7. [7]

      Ji H, Zhang Q, Wang B, Li C, Shan H. Synergistic Effect of Nickel Species and γ-Alumina Added to HZSM-5 on the Methanol to Aromatics[J]. Catal. Lett., 2014, 144(11):  1860-1867. doi: 10.1007/s10562-014-1348-8

    8. [8]

      Wang Y, Song J, Baxter N, Kuo G T, Wang S. Synthesis of Hierarchical ZSM-5 Zeolites by Solid-State Crystallization and Their Catalytic Properties[J]. J. Catal., 2017, 349:  53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.03.005

    9. [9]

      Nandan D, Saxena S K, Viswanadham N. Synthesis of Hierarchical ZSM-5 Using Glucose as a Templating Precursor[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(4):  1054-1059. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13904B

    10. [10]

      Cui T L, Li X H, Lv L B, Wang X K, Su J. Nanoscale Kirkendall Growth of Silicalite-1 Zeolite Mesocrystals with Controlled Mesoporosity and Size[J]. Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(63):  12563-12566. doi: 10.1039/C5CC04837K

    11. [11]

      Li Y N, Liu S L, Xie S J, Xu L Y. Promoted Metal Utilization Capacity of Alkali-Treated Zeolite: Preparation of Zn/ZSM-5 and Its Application in 1-Hexene Aromatization[J]. Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 360(1):  8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.039

    12. [12]

      Katada N, Igi H, Kim J H, Niwa M. Determination of the Acidic Properties of Zeolite by Theoretical Analysis of Temperature Programmed Desorption of Ammonia Based on Adsorption Equilbrium[J]. J.Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101(31):  5969-5977. doi: 10.1021/jp9639152

    13. [13]

      Rodríguez-González L, Hermes F, Bertmer M, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Jiménez-López A, Simon U. The Acid Properties of H-ZSM-5 as Studied by NH3-TPD and 27Al-MAS-NMR Spectroscopy[J]. Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 328(2):  174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.06.003

    14. [14]

      He Y P, Liu M, Dai C Y, Xu S T, Wei Y X, Liu Z M, Guo X W. Modification of Nanocrystalline HZSM-5 Zeolite with Tetrapropylammonium Hydroxide and Its Catalytic Performance in Methanol to Gasoline Reaction[J]. Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34(6):  1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60579-8

    15. [15]

      Rownaghi A, Rezaei F, Hedlund J. Uniform Mesoporous ZSM-5 Single Crystals Catalyst with High Resistance to Coke Formation for Methanol Deoxygenation[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 151:  26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.020

    16. [16]

      艾沙·努拉洪. 纳米Au/HZSM-5沸石催化剂的制备与正丁烷转化研究. 大连理工大学, 2013: 90-95Aisha N H. Nano-Au/HZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst Prearation and Its Performance in n-Butane Conversion. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013: 90-95

    17. [17]

      Zhang X, Zhong J, Wang J, Zhang L, Gao J, Liu A. Catalytic Performance and Characterization of Ni-Doped HZSM-5 Catalysts for Selective Trimerization of n-Butane[J]. Fuel Process. Technol., 2009, 90(7/8):  863-870.

    18. [18]

      Zhang G Q, Bai T, Chen T F, Fan W T, Zhang X. Conversion of Methanol to Light Aromatics on Zn-Modified Nano-HZSM-5 Zeolite Catalysts[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53(39):  14932-14940. doi: 10.1021/ie5021156

    19. [19]

      艾沙·努拉洪, 刘家旭, 赵文平, 王桂茹, 郭洪臣. 正丁烷和异丁烷在改性纳米HZSM-5上的芳构化反应[J]. 分子催化, 2012,26,(3): 257-264. Aisha N, LIU J X, ZHAO W P, WANG G R, GUO H C. Aromatization of n-Butane and i-Butane over Modified Nano-HZSM-5 Catalyst[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis, 2012, 26(3):  257-264.

    20. [20]

      Aisha N, Liu J H, He N, Guo H C. Catalytic Conversion of n-Butane over Au-Zn-Modified Nano-Sized HZSM-5[J]. Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34(6):  1262-1266. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60539-7

    21. [21]

      Xue H F, Huang X M, Zhan E S, Ma M, Shen W. Dimethyl Ether Carbonylation to Methyl Acetate over Nanosized Mordenites[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52:  11510-11515. doi: 10.1021/ie400909u

    22. [22]

      Shang W X, Gao M Y, Chai Y C, Wu G, Guan N, Li L. Stabilizing Isolated Rhodium Cations by MFI Zeolite for Heterogeneous Methanol Carbonylation[J]. ACS Catal., 2021, 11:  7249-7256. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00950

    23. [23]

      Feng S Q, Lin X S, Song X E, Liu Y, Jiang Z, Ding Y. Insight into the Stability of Binuclear Ir-La Catalysts for Efficient Heterogeneous Methanol Carbonylation[J]. J. Catal., 2019, 377:  400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.06.050

    24. [24]

      刘兴云, 佘励勤, 李宣文, 袁世斌. 烃分子在锌改性的ZSM-5沸石上的芳构化Ⅱ[J]. L1616酸的强度分布及活性中心的位置. 石油学报(石油加工), 1989(4): 34-41. LIU X Y, YU L Q, LI X W, YUAN S B. Aromatization of Hydrocarbon Molecules on Zinc-Modified ZSM-5 Zeolite Ⅱ. Intensity Distribution of L 1616 Acid and Position of Active Center. Acta Petrolei Sinica[J]. Petroleum Processing Section, 1989, (4):  34-41.

    25. [25]

      吴指南, 伍肇炯. C4烃类在ZSM-5分子筛催化剂上的芳构化(Ⅱ)[J]. 石油化工, 1983(4): 185-189. WU Z N, WU Z J. Aromatization of C4 Hydrocarbons on ZSM-5 Molecular Sieve Catalyst(Ⅱ)[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 1983, (4):  185-189.

    26. [26]

      Niu X J, Gao J, Miao Q, Dong M, Wang G F, Fan W B, Qin Z F, Wang J G. Influence of Preparation Method on the Performance of Zn-Containing HZSM-5 Catalysts in Methanol-to-Aromatics[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2014, 197:  252-261. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.06.027

    27. [27]

      Berndt H, Lietz G, Völter J. Zinc Promoted H-ZSM-5 Catalysts for Conversion of Propane to Aromatics Ⅱ[J]. Nature of the Active Sites and Their Activation. Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 46(2):  365-379.

    28. [28]

      Peng F. A Novel Sulfided Mo/C Catalyst for Direct Vapor Phase Carbonylation of Methanol at Atmospheric Pressure[J]. J. Nat. Gas Chem, 2003, 12:  31-36.

    29. [29]

      Treacy M, Higgins J B. Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites Fifth (5th) Revised Edition[J]. Appl. Catal., 1986, 21(2):  388-389.

    30. [30]

      Wang X M, Zhao Z, Xu C M, Duan A J, Zhang L, Jiang J Y. Effects of Light Rare Earth on Acidity and Catalytic Performance of HZSM-5 Zeolite for Catalytic Cracking of Butane to Light Olefins[J]. J. Rare Earths, 2007, 25(3):  321-328. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(07)60430-X

    31. [31]

      Haw J F, Song W G, Marcus D M, Nicholas J B. The Mechanism of Methanol to Hydrocarbon Catalysis[J]. Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36:  317-326.

    32. [32]

      袁小超. 甲醇羰基化制醋酸催化体系的研究. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2010: 22-30YUAN X C. Catalytic System of Methanol Carbonylation to Acetic Acid. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2010: 22-30

    33. [33]

      Rojas H A, Cubillos J A, Martinez J J, Guerrero D C, Reyes P. Effect of the Activation Method on Activity of Supported Platinum Catalysts for Hydrogenation of m-Dinitrobenzene to m-Phenylenediamine[J]. Curr. Org. Chem., 2012, 16(23):  2770-2773.

    34. [34]

      Liu H, Guo Y G. Analysis on Investment of PetroChina Petrochemical Industry in 2005[J]. International Oil Economy, 2006, 14(7):  40-44.

    35. [35]

      Littlechild J A. Archaeal Enzymes and Applications in Industrial Biocatalysts[J]. Archaea, 2015, 2015:  1-10.

    36. [36]

      Al-Arfaj M A, Luyben W L. Comparative Control Study of Ideal and Methyl Acetate Reactive Distillation[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2002, 57(24):  5039-5050.

    37. [37]

      Kang N, Yang Q L, An K, Li S S, Zhang L H, Liu Y. Mixed Oxides of La-Ga-O Modified Co/ZrO2 for Higher Alcohol Synthesis from Syngas[J]. Catal. Today, 2018, 330:  46-53.

    38. [38]

      Cheng K, Zhang L, Kang J C, Peng X B, Zhang Q H, Wang Y. Selective Transformation of Syngas into Gasoline-Range Hydrocarbons over Mesoporous HZSM-5 Supported Cobalt Nanoparticles[J]. Chem. Eur. J., 2015, 21(5):  1928-1937.

    39. [39]

      Choi S M, Kang Y J, Kim S W. Effect of γ-Alumina Nanorods on CO Hydrogenation to Higher Alcohols over Lithium-Promoted CuZn-Based Catalysts[J]. Appl. Catal., 2018, 549:  188-196.

    40. [40]

      Won B D, Ham H, Cho J M, Lee J B, Kim C U, Roh H S, Moon D J, Bae J W. Effect of Mn Promoter on Rh/Tungsten Carbide on Product Distributions of Alcohols and Hydrocarbons by CO Hydrogenation[J]. RSC Adv., 2016, 6(103):  101535-101543.

    41. [41]

      Gao S, Li X Y, Li Y Y, Yu H B, Zhang F F, Sun Y M, Fang H H, Zhang X B, Liang X L, Yuan Y Z. Effects of Gallium as an Additive on Activated Carbon-Supported Cobalt Catalysts for the Synthesis of Higher Alcohols from Syngas[J]. Fuel, 2018, 230:  194-201.

    42. [42]

      Huanng C, Zhang M W, Zhu C, Mu X L, Zhang K, Zhong L S, Fang K G, Wu M H. Fabrication of Highly Stable SiO2 Encapsulated Multiple CuFe Nanoparticles for Higher Alcohols Synthesis via CO Hydrogenation[J]. Catal. Lett., 2018, 148(4):  1080-1092.

    43. [43]

      Shen H D, Sun Z Y. A Miracle Metal@Zeolite for Selective Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol[J]. Chem, 2020, 6(3):  46-53.

    44. [44]

      Wang C T, Zhang J, Qin G Q, Wang L, Zuidema E, Yang Q, Dang S S, Yang C G, Xiao J P, Meng X J, Mesters C, Xiao F S. Direct Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol within Zeolite Crystals[J]. Chem, 2020, 6(3):  646-657.

    45. [45]

      Xu H S, Chen Q L. Catalytic Properties of ZSM-5 based Cu-Zn Catalysts Applies to Ethanol Synthesis from Syngas//Jawaid M, Kenawy E R[J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2016, 67:  01012.

    46. [46]

      Wang D, Bi Q, Yin G, Wang P, Huag F, Xie X, Jiang M. Photochemical Preparation of Anatase Titania Supported Gold Catalyst for Ethanol Synthesis from CO2 Hydrogenation[J]. Catal. Lett., 2017, 148(1):  1-12.

    47. [47]

      Luk H T, Mondelli C, Ferre D C, Stewart J A, Perez-Ramirez J. Status and Prospects in Higher Alcohols Synthesis from Syngas[J]. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(5):  1358-1426.

  • 图 1  Diagram of mini-scale pulse reactor

    图 2  (a) XRD patterns of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5; (c) NH3-TPD curves of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5

    图 3  Py-FTIR spectra of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts at (a) 150 ℃, (b) 300 ℃, and (c) 450 ℃

    图 4  Performance of methanol to ester over HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5: (a) XCH3OH at different temperatures; (b) relationship between NB+NL and XCH3OH at 300 ℃; (c) YMC+MF (Inset) and SMC+MF at different temperatures; (d) relationship between NB /NL and SMC+MF at 300 ℃; (e) Yby-products (Inset) and Sby-products at different temperatures; (f) Yalkanes (Inset) and Salkanes at different temperatures

    MC=methyl acetate, MF=methyl formate

    图 5  Conversion of methanol to methyl acetate and ethyl acetate

    图 6  Metal activation process on HZSM-5

    表 1  XRF measurement results of different metal modified HZSM-5 catalysts*

    Result HZSM-5 Au/HZSM-5 Pt/HZSM-5 Pd/HZSM-5 Zn/HZSM-5 Cu/HZSM-5
    wAl2O3 / % 3.45 3.35 3.64 3.35 3.41 3.09
    wSiO2 /% 95.68 94.50 95.62 94.50 95.39 95.28
    Actual loading / % 100 100 100 100 100
    Metal loading / % 90 95 91 93 95
    * Metal mass fraction of the supported metal catalyst sample prepared by the negative pressure deposition precipitation method was 1%.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  Textural properties of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5

    Sample SBETa / (m2·g-1) Smicb / (m2·g-1) Sextc / (m2·g-1) Vtd / (cm2·g-1) Vmese / (cm2·g-1) Vmicf /(cm2·g-1) Dg / nm
    HZSM-5 357 256 119 0.25 0.14 0.10 3.33
    Pt/HZSM-5 352 245 108 0.30 0.17 0.13 3.27
    Pd/HZSM-5 311 219 103 0.19 0.11 0.07 3.30
    Zn/HZSM-5 345 223 123 0.24 0.14 0.09 3.53
    Au/HZSM-5 321 225 96 0.21 0.12 0.09 3.21
    Cu/HZSM-5 351 238 114 0.24 0.14 0.10 3.34
    a Specific surface area calculated using BET method; b Measured by t-plot method; c Sext=SBET-Smic; d Single point desorption total pore volume of pores with diameter less than 40.312 2 nm at p/p0=0.95; e Vmes=Vt+Vmic; f t-Plot micropore volum; g Average pore diameter.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  Deconvolution of NH3-TPD profiles for all the samples

    Sample Temperature / C Relative peak intensity of acid site
    Weak peak Strong peak Weak acid Medium acid Strong acid Total acid
    HZSM-5 251 441 2 643.00 1 082.01 1 679.66 5 404.69
    Au/HZSM-5 266 426 2 027.50 1 113.76 1 203.28 4 344.56
    Zn/HZSM-5 266 431 2 801.57 1 150.20 1 112.70 4 764.48
    Pt/HZSM-5 271 416 2 376.50 1 244.19 1 484.86 5 405.57
    Pd/HZSM-5 236 416 1 609.58 1 489.09 2 370.16 5 468.83
    Cu/HZSM-5 276 416 2 115.11 1 329.80 1 556.18 4 971.10
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  B and L acid sites of HZSM-5 and M/HZSM-5 catalysts at different temperatures

    Sample 150 ℃ 300 ℃ 450 ℃
    NL NB NB/NL NB+NL NL NB NB/NL NB+NL NL NB NB/NL NB+NL
    HZSM-5 6.54 4.23 0.65 10.77 2.39 1.80 0.76 4.19 1.15 0.82 0.71 1.97
    Au/HZSM-5 5.86 2.31 0.39 8.17 3.36 1.42 0.42 4.78 1.19 0.64 0.54 1.83
    Zn/HZSM-5 5.78 2.39 0.41 8.17 2.82 1.29 0.46 4.11 1.26 0.61 0.48 1.87
    Pt/HZSM-5 9.70 2.64 0.27 12.34 4.81 1.57 0.33 6.37 1.83 0.77 0.42 2.60
    Pd/HZSM-5 3.37 0.59 0.18 3.96 1.39 0.28 0.20 1.66 0.99 0.23 0.23 0.76
    Cu/HZSM-5 13.33 4.51 0.34 17.85 6.26 3.07 0.49 9.33 3.18 1.60 0.50 4.78
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 文章访问数:  1108
  • HTML全文浏览量:  168
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-05-10
  • 收稿日期:  2021-02-18
  • 修回日期:  2022-01-20
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章