Syntheses, Crystal Structures, and Magnetic Properties of 0D Tetranuclear Nickel(Ⅱ) Coordination Compound and 1D Manganese(Ⅱ) Coordination Polymer Constructed from Biphenyl Tricarboxylic Acid

Yu LI Bing-Song WEN Xun-Zhong ZOU Bin HUANG Wen-Da QIU Ze-Min ZHANG Ao YOU Xiao-Ling CHENG

Citation:  LI Yu, WEN Bing-Song, ZOU Xun-Zhong, HUANG Bin, QIU Wen-Da, ZHANG Ze-Min, YOU Ao, CHENG Xiao-Ling. Syntheses, Crystal Structures, and Magnetic Properties of 0D Tetranuclear Nickel(Ⅱ) Coordination Compound and 1D Manganese(Ⅱ) Coordination Polymer Constructed from Biphenyl Tricarboxylic Acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 34(5): 981-988. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.131 shu

由联苯三羧酸配体构筑的零维四核镍(Ⅱ)配合物和一维锰(Ⅱ)配位聚合物的合成、晶体结构及磁性质

    通讯作者: 黎彧, liyuletter@163.com
    成晓玲, gcxl@163.com
  • 基金项目:

    广东轻院珠江学者人才类项目 RC2015-001

    佛山市科技计划项目 2017AB003922

    广东省高等职业院校珠江学者岗位计划资助项目(2015),广东省自然科学基金(No.2016A030313761),广东轻院珠江学者人才类项目(No.RC2015-001),生物无机与合成化学教育部重点实验室开放基金(2016),广东省高校创新团队项目(2017),国家自然科学基金(No.21701032),佛山市科技计划项目(No.2017AB003922)和广东轻院人才类项目(No.KYRC2017-0021,KYRC2017-0025)资助

    广东省高校创新团队项目 2017

    广东省高等职业院校珠江学者岗位计划资助项目 2015

    广东省自然科学基金 2016A030313761

    生物无机与合成化学教育部重点实验室开放基金 2016

    广东轻院人才类项目 KYRC2017-0021

    国家自然科学基金 21701032

    广东轻院人才类项目 KYRC2017-0025

摘要: 采用水热方法,用2种联苯三羧酸配体biphenyl-2,5,3'-tricarboxylate acid(H3bptc)和2-(4-carboxypyridin-3-yl)terephalic acid(H3cptc)以及菲咯啉(phen)或2,2'-联吡啶(2,2'-bipy)分别与NiCl2·6H2O和MnCl2·4H2O反应,合成了一个具有零维四核镍结构的配合物[Ni2μ3-Hbptc)(Hbptc)(phen)3(H2O)]2·4H2O(1)和一个基于三核锰单元的一维链状配位聚合物{[Mn3μ4-cptc)2(2,2'-bipy)2(H2O)4]·2H2O}n2),并对其结构和磁性质进行了研究。结构分析结果表明2个配合物均属于三斜晶系,P1空间群。配合物1具有零维四核镍结构,而且这些四核镍单元通过O-H…O氢键作用进一步形成了三维超分子框架。而配合物2中存在一个中心对称的三核锰单元,这些三核锰单元又通过配体进一步连接成了一维链。研究表明,配合物12中相邻金属离子间存在反铁磁相互作用。

English

  • In recent years, the rational design and assembly of coordination polymers has been of considerable interest due to their potential applications, archite-ctures, and topologies[1-5]. Many factors, such as the coordination geometry of the metal centers, type and connectivity of organic ligands, stoichiometry, reaction conditions, template effect, presence of auxiliary ligands, and pH values can play the key role in the construction of the coordination networks[6-10]. The design and selection of the special ligands is very important in the construction of these coordination polymers.

    Multi-carboxylate biphenyl ligands have been certified to be of great significance as constructors due to their strong coordination abilities in various modes, which could satisfy different geometric require-ments of metal centers[7-9, 11-16]. In order to extend our research in this field, we chose two biphenyl tricar-boxylic acid ligands, biphenyl-2, 5, 3′-tricarboxylate acid (H3bptc) and 2-(4-carboxypyridin-3-yl)terephalic acid (H3cptc) to construct novel coordination comp-ounds. Both ligands possesses the following features: (1) they have three carboxyl groups that may be completely or partially deprotonated, inducing rich coordination modes and allowing interesting structures with higher dimensionalities; (2) they can act as hydrogen-bond acceptor as well as donor, depending upon the degree of deprotonation; (3) the free rotation of C-C single bonds between two the aromatic rings could form numbers of coordination geometries of metal centers; thus, it may ligate metal centers in different orientation.

    Taking into account these factors, we herein report the syntheses, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of two Ni(Ⅱ) and Mn(Ⅱ) coordination compounds constructed from biphenyl tricarboxylic acid ligands.

    All chemicals and solvents were of AR grade and used without further purification. Carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen were determined using an Elementar Vario EL elemental analyzer. IR spectra were recorded using KBr pellets and a Bruker EQUINOX 55 spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) data were collected on a LINSEIS STA PT1600 thermal analyzer with a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1. Magnetic susceptibility data were collected in the 2~300 K temperature range with a Quantum Design SQUID Magnetometer MPMS XL-7 with a field of 0.1 T. A correction was made for the diamagnetic contribution prior to data analysis.

    A mixture of NiCl2·6H2O (0.047 g, 0.20 mmol), H3bptc (0.057 g, 0.2 mmol), phen (0.040 g, 0.2 mmol), NaOH (0.016 g, 0.40 mmol), and H2O (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 15 min, and then sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, and heated at 160 ℃ for 3 days, followed by cooling to room temperature at a rate of 10 ℃·h-1. Green block-shaped crystals of 1 were isolated manually, and washed with distilled water. Yield: 45% (based on H3bptc). Anal. Calcd. for C66H46Ni2N6O15(%): C 61.91, H 3.62, N 6.56; Found(%): C 61.75, H 3.60, N 6.61. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 318w, 2 924m, 1 714w, 1 587s, 1 564s, 1 517m, 1 471w, 1 424m, 1 407w, 1 373w, 1 216w, 1 147w, 1 100w, 1 042w, 985w, 927w, 852w, 805w, 776w, 724m, 643w, 516w.

    A mixture of MnCl2·4H2O (0.059 g, 0.30 mmol), H3cptc (0.057 g, 0.2 mmol), 2, 2′-bipy (0.047 g, 0.3 mmol), NaOH (0.024 g, 0.60 mmol), and H2O (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 15 min, and then sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, and heated at 160 ℃ for 3 days, followed by cooling to room temperature at a rate of 10 ℃·h-1. Yellow block-shaped crystals of 2 were isolated manually, and washed with distilled water. Yield: 62% (based on H3cptc). Anal. Calcd. for C48H40Mn3N6O18(%): C 49.97, H 3.49, N 7.28; Found(%): C 50.14, H 3.51, N 7.23. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 057w, 1 598m, 1 569s, 1 471w, 1 430w, 1 373s, 1 262w, 1 170w, 1 153w, 1 048w, 1 031w, 1 014w, 933w, 904w, 868w, 852w, 810w, 765m, 730w, 707w, 649w, 551w. The compounds are insoluble in water and common organic solvents, such as methanol, ethanol, acetone, and DMF.

    Two single crystals with dimensions of 0.25 mm×0.22 mm×0.21 mm (1) and 0.26 mm×0.24 mm×0.23 mm (2) were analyzed at 293(2) K on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer with Mo radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm). The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full matrix least-square on F2 using the SHELXTL-2014 program[17]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All the hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model. A summary of the crystallography data and structure refinements for 1 and 2 is given in Table 1. The selected bond lengths and angles for compounds 1 and 2 are listed in Table 2. Hydrogen bond parameters of compounds 1 and 2 are given in Table 3 and 4.

    表 1

    表 1  Crystal data for compounds 1 and 2
    Table 1.  Crystal data for compounds 1 and 2
    下载: 导出CSV
    Compound 1 2
    Chemical formula C66H46Ni2N6O15 C48H40Mn3N6O18
    Molecular weight 1 280.51 1 153.68
    Crystal system Triclinic Triclinic
    Space group P1 P1
    a/nm 1.243 18(6) 0.719 34(4)
    b/nm 1.422 15(10) 1.023 41(5)
    c/nm 1.662 89(11) 1.739 84(11)
    α/(°) 95.289(6) 96.993(5)
    β/(°) 96.231(5) 101.237(5)
    γ/(°) 108.755(5) 106.819(5)
    V/nm3 2.742 1(3) 1.180 71(13)
    Z 2 1
    F(000) 1 320 589
    θ range for data collection/(°) 3.244-25.049 3.409-25.050
    Limiting indices -14 ≤ h ≤ 14, -16 ≤ k ≤ 16, -19 ≤ l ≤ 15 -8 ≤ h ≤ 8, -12 ≤ k ≤ 12, -18 ≤ l ≤ 20
    Reflection collected, unique (Rint) 17 820, 9 694 (0.061 9) 7 235, 4 178 (0.031 6)
    Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.551 1.623
    μ/mm-1 0.768 0.876
    Data, restraint, parameter 9 694, 0, 804 4 178, 0, 340
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.039 1.060
    Final R indices [I≥2σ(I)]R1, wR2 0.074 3, 0.153 2 0.043 8, 0.081 8
    R indices (all data)R1, wR2 0.134 7, 0.196 3 0.061 6, 0.091 5
    Largest diff. peak and hole/(e·nm-3) 1 173 and -461 426 and -560

    表 2

    表 2  Selected bond lengths (nm) and bond angles (°) for compounds 1 and 2
    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and bond angles (°) for compounds 1 and 2
    下载: 导出CSV
    1
    Ni(1)-O(1) 0.207 9(3) Ni(1)-O(2)A 0.207 O(4) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.212 2(4)
    Ni(1)-N(2) 0.207 9(5) Ni(1)-N(3) 0.207 3(5) Ni(1)-N(4) 0.211 8(5)
    Ni(2)-O(6) 0.204 9(4) Ni(2)-O(7) 0.221 2(4) Ni(2)-O(8) 0.211 7(4)
    Ni(2)-O(13) 0.202 8(4) Ni(2)-N(5) 0.206 9(5) Ni(2)-N(6) 0.205 9(5)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(3) 98.3O(17) O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(2) 88.22(18) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(2) 170.67(18)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-O(1) 88.08(14) N(3)-Ni(1)-O(1) 96.01(15) N(2)-Ni(1)-O(1) 90.84(16)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(4) 174.09(17) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(4) 78.83(19) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(4) 94.05(19)
    O(1)-Ni(1)-N(4) 97.32(16) O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(1) 87.61(16) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(1) 94.15(19)
    N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 79.39(19) O(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 169.44(18) N(4)-Ni(1)-N(1) 87.46(17)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-O(6) 91.43(18) O(13)-Ni(2)-N(6) 103.13(18) O(6)-Ni(2)-N(6) 95.08(19)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-N(5) 91.4O(19) O(6)-Ni(2)-N(5) 174.41(19) N(6)-Ni(2)-N(5) 79.58(19)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-O(8) 156.13(17) O(6)-Ni(2)-O(8) 83.04(17) N(6)-Ni(2)-O(8) 100.49(18)
    N(5)-Ni(2)-O(8) 96.23(18) O(13)-Ni(2)-O(7) 95.71(17) O(6)-Ni(2)-O(7) 89.44(17)
    N(6)-Ni(2)-O(7) 160.49(19) N(5)-Ni(2)-O(7) 95.08(18) O(8)-Ni(2)-O(7) 61.17(16)
    2
    Mn(1)-O(1) 0.210 2(2) Mn(1)-O(5)A 0.214 6(2) Mn(1)-O(7) 0.213 2(2)
    Mn(1)-N(1)A 0.226 7(3) Mn(1)-N(2) 0.230 1(3) Mn(1)-N(3) 0.232 3(3)
    Mn(1)-O(2) 0.220 2(2) Mn(1)-O(2)B 0.220 2(2) Mn(1)-O(4)A 0.213 4(2)
    Mn(1)-O(4)C 0.213 4(2) Mn(1)-O(8) 0.223 1(3) Mn(1)-O(8)B 0.223 1(3)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-O(7) 99.47(10) O(1)-Mn(1)-O(5)A 90.87(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-O(5)A 163.79(9)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-N(1)A 103.66(9) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(1)A 91.28(9) O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(1)A 74.06(9)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-N(2) 86.36(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(2) 93.64(10) O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(2) 99.48(10)
    N(1)A-Mn(1)-N(2) 167.97(11) O(1)-Mn(1)-N(3) 156.17(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(3) 88.7O(10)
    O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(3) 86.72(10) N(1)A-Mn(1)-N(3) 98.46(10) N(2)-Mn(1)-N(3) 70.71(10)
    O(4)C-Mn(2)-O(2) 87.09(9) O(4)A-Mn(2)-O(2) 92.91(9) O(4)C-Mn(1)-O(8)B 93.19(9)
    O(4)A-Mn(1)-O(8)B 86.81(9) O(2)-Mn(1)-O(8)B 89.65(9) O(2)-Mn(1)-O(8) 90.35(9)
    Symmetry codes: A:-x+1, -y, -z+1 for 1; A: x, y+1, z; B: -x, -y+1, -z; C: -x, -y, -z for 2.

    表 3

    表 3  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 1
    Table 3.  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    O(4)-H(4)…O(9)A 0.082 0.168 0.248 2 163.0
    O(12)-H(12)…O(8)B 0.082 0.180 0.254 7 151.1
    O(13)-H(1W)…O(9)C 0.085 0.175 0.259 7 179.8
    O(13)-H(2W)…O(5) 0.085 0.177 0.262 2 179.7
    O(14)-H(3W)…O(3)D 0.085 0.195 0.280 5 179.3
    Symmetry codes: A:-x-1, y-1, z; B: -x+1, -y+1, -z; C: x-1, y, z; D: x+1, y+1, z.

    表 4

    表 4  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 2
    Table 4.  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 2
    下载: 导出CSV
    D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    O(7)-H(1W)…O(6)A 0.086 0.198 0.276 4 151.5
    O(7)-H(2W)…O(9)B 0.085 0.184 0.268 8 179.2
    O(8)-H(3W)…O(3)C 0.090 0.209 0.286 5 143.5
    Symmetry codes: A: x-1, y+1, z; B: x-1, y, z; C: x+1, y+1, z.

    CCDC: 1588394, 1; 1588395, 2.

    2.1.1   [Ni2(μ3-Hbptc)(Hbptc)(phen)3(H2O)]2·4H2O (1)

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1. Its asymmetric unit contains two crystallo-graphically unique Ni(Ⅱ) atoms, two Hbptc2- blocks, three phen moieties, one H2O ligand and two lattice water molecules. As depicted in Fig. 1, the six-coordinated Ni1 atom displays a distorted octahedral {NiN4O2} geometry filled by two carboxylate O atoms from two different μ3-Hbptc2- blocks and four N atoms from two phen ligands. The Ni2 center is coordinated by one carboxylate O atom from one μ3-Hbptc2- block, two carboxylate O atoms from one terminal Hbptc2- block, one O atom from the H2O ligand, and two N atoms from one phen moiety, thus composing distorted octahedral {NiN2O4} geometry. The lengths of the Ni-O bonds range from 0.202 8(4) to 0.221 2(4) nm, whereas the Ni-N distances vary from 0.205 9(5) to 0.212 2(4) nm; these bonding parameters are comparable to those found in other reported Ni(Ⅱ) compounds[7, 9, 11]. In 1, the Hbptc2- ligands adopt two different coordination modes (modes Ⅰ and Ⅱ, Scheme 1), in which the deproto-nated carboxylate groups show the monodentate, bidentate or uncoordinated modes. The dihedral angles between two phenyl rings in the Hbptc2- are 52.52° and 39.91°, respectively. Two μ3-Hbptc2- ligands bridge alternately neighboring Ni(Ⅱ)ions to form a discrete tetranuclear nickel(Ⅱ) structure (Fig. 2). These Ni4 units are assembled to a 3D supramolecular framework through O-H…O hydrogen bond (Fig. 3 and Table 3).

    图 Scheme 1

    图 Scheme 1  Coordination modes of Hbptc2-/cptc3- ligands in compounds 1 and 2
    Figure Scheme 1.  Coordination modes of Hbptc2-/cptc3- ligands in compounds 1 and 2

    图 1

    图 1  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 1 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids
    Figure 1.  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 1 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids

    图 2

    图 2  Tetranuclear nickel(Ⅱ) unit
    Figure 2.  Tetranuclear nickel(Ⅱ) unit

    图 3

    图 3  Perspective of 3D supramolecular framework viewed from b axis in 1
    Figure 3.  Perspective of 3D supramolecular framework viewed from b axis in 1
    2.1.2   {[Mn3(μ4-cptc)2(2, 2′-bipy)2(H2O)4]·2H2O}n (2)

    The asymmetric unit of 2 consists of two crystallographically distinct Mn(Ⅱ) atoms (Mn1 with full occupancy; Mn2 is positioned on a twofold rotation axis), one μ4-cptc3- block, one 2, 2′-bipy ligand, two coordinated and one lattice water molecule. As shown in Fig. 4, six-coordinate Mn1 atom reveals distorted octahedral {MnN3O3} environment, filled by one N and two O atoms from three individual μ4-cptc3- blocks, one O atom from the H2O ligand, and two N atoms from the 2, 2′-bipy moiety. The Mn2 center is coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms from four distinct cptc3- moieties and two O atoms from two H2O ligands, thus forming octahedral {MnO6} geometry. The Mn-O distances range from 0.210 2(2) to 0.223 1(3) nm, whereas the Mn-N distances vary from 0.226 7(3) to 0.232 3(3) nm; these bonding parameters are compar-able to those observed in other Mn(Ⅱ) compounds[7-9, 11]. In 2, the cptc3- block acts as a μ4-N, O4-spacer and its COO- groups take a monodentate or bidentate mode (mode Ⅲ, Scheme 1). In cptc3-, a dihedral angle (between pyridyl and benzene rings) is 52.30°. Three neighboring Mn(Ⅱ) ions are bridged by four different μ4-cptc3- ligands, giving rise to a centrosymmetric trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) subunit with the Mn…Mn distance of 0.508 4(6) nm (Fig. 5). The adjacent Mn3 subunits are further linked by the cptc3- blocks into a 1D chain (Fig. 6), having the shortest distance of 1.023 4(5) nm between the neighboring trimanganese(Ⅱ) subunits.

    图 4

    图 4  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 2 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids
    Figure 4.  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 2 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids

    图 5

    图 5  Trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) unit in compound 2
    Figure 5.  Trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) unit in compound 2

    图 6

    图 6  One dimensional chain along a axis in compound 2
    Figure 6.  One dimensional chain along a axis in compound 2

    To determine the thermal stability of compounds 1 and 2, their thermal behaviors were investigated under nitrogen atmosphere by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). As shown in Fig. 7, compound 1 loses its four lattice and two coordinated water molecules in the range of 152~241 ℃ (Obsd. 3.9%, Calcd. 4.2%), followed by the decomposition at 325 ℃. The TGA curve of 2 reveals that two lattice and four coor-dinated water molecules are released between 98~238 ℃ (Obsd. 9.6%, Calcd. 9.4%), and the dehydrated solid begins to decompose at 382 ℃.

    图 7

    图 7  TGA curves of compounds 1 and 2
    Figure 7.  TGA curves of compounds 1 and 2

    Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility studies were carried out on powder samples of 1 and 2 in the 2~300 K temperature range. For 1, the χMT value at 300 K is 4.08 cm3·mol-1·K, which is close to the value of 4.00 cm3·mol-1·K for four magnetically isolated Ni(Ⅱ) center (SNi=1, g=2.0). Upon cooling, the χMT value drops down very slowly from 4.08 cm3·mol-1 ·K at 300 K to 3.64 cm3·mol-1·K at 60 K, and then decreases steeply to 1.40 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K (Fig. 8). In the 8~300 K interval, the χM-1 vs T plot for 1 obeys the Curie-Weiss law with a Weiss constant θ of -6.52 K and a Curie constant C of 4.15 cm3·mol-1·K, sugg-esting a weak antiferromagnetic interaction between the Ni(Ⅱ) ions.

    图 8

    图 8  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 1
    Figure 8.  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 1

    We tried to fit the magnetic data of 1 using the following expression[18] for a dinuclear Ni(Ⅱ) unit:

    $ H = - J{S_1}{S_2} \\ {\chi _{{\rm{M}}'}} = \frac{{N{\beta ^2}{g^2}}}{{3k(T-\theta )}}\frac{{\sum {S'(S' + 1)(2S' + 1){{\rm{e}}^{-E(S')/(kT)}}} }}{{\sum {(2S' + 1){{\rm{e}}^{-E(S')/(kT)}}} }} $

    $ {\chi _{\rm{M}}}{\rm{ = }}{\chi _{{\rm{M}}'}}(1-\rho ) + \frac{{4S(S + 1)N{\beta ^2}{g^2}\rho }}{{3kT}} + {\rm{TIP}} $

    where ρ is a paramagnetic impurity fraction and TIP is temperature independent paramagnetism. Using this model, the susceptibility for 1 above 60 K was simul-ated, leading to the values of J=-2.25 cm-1, g=2.10, ρ=0.010, and TIP=4.58×10-6 cm3·mol-1, with the agreement factor R=∑(Tobs-Tcalc)2/∑(Tobs)2=6.14×10-4. The negative J parameter confirms that a weak anti-ferromagnetic exchange coupling exists between the adjacent Ni(Ⅱ) centers, which is in agreement with a negative θ value.

    For 2, the χMT value at 300 K is 13.41 cm3·mol-1 ·K, which is close to the value of 13.12 cm3·mol-1·K expected for three magnetically isolated high-spin Mn(Ⅱ) centers (SMn=5/2, g=2.0). Upon cooling, the χMT value drops down very slowly from 13.41 cm3·mol-1·K at 300 K to 12.60 cm3·mol-1·K at 70 K and then decreases steeply to 2.81 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K (Fig. 9). The χM-1 vs T plot for 2 in the 2~300 K interval obeys the Curie-Weiss law with a Weiss constant θ of -4.34 K and a Curie constant C of 13.59 cm3·mol-1·K. The negative value of θ and the decrease of the χMT should be attributed to the overall antiferromagnetic coupling between the Mn(Ⅱ) centers within the Mn3 unit. According to the structure of compound 2, there is one set of magnetic exchange pathway within the trinuclear cluster via carboxylate bridge (Fig. 5). We tried to fit the magnetic data of 2 using the following expression[19-20] for the linear trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) motif:

    图 9

    图 9  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 2
    Figure 9.  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 2

    $ \begin{array}{l} \hat H =-2\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j > 1}^n {{J_{ij}}{{\vec S}_i}{{\vec S}_j}} } \\ \hat H =-2{J_{12}}{{\vec S}_1}{{\vec S}_2}-2{J_{23}}{{\vec S}_2}{{\vec S}_3} - 2{J_{13}}{{\vec S}_1}{{\vec S}_3}\\ \chi = \frac{{N{\beta ^2}{g^2}}}{{3kT}}\frac{{\sum\limits_{{S_{\rm{T}}}} {{S_{\rm{T}}}({S_{\rm{T}}} + 1)(2{S_{\rm{T}}} + 1){{\rm{e}}^{ - E({S_{\rm{T}}})/(kT)}}} }}{{\sum\limits_{{S_{\rm{T}}}} {(2{S_{\rm{T}}} + 1){{\rm{e}}^{ - E({S_{\rm{T}}})/(kT)}}} }} \end{array} $

    $ {\chi _{\rm{m}}} = \frac{\chi }{{1- [2zJ'/(N{g^2}{\beta ^2})]\chi }} $

    where ST is tolal spin of the linear trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) motif; J12=J23=J1, J13=J2 (J12 and J23 are the exchange interactions between the "central" Mn(Ⅱ) and two "outer" Mn(Ⅱ) atoms; J2 is the exchange interaction between the "outer" Mn(Ⅱ) ions within a Mn3 unit), zJ′ refers to the intercluster coupling constant in the 1D chain. This model gives satisfactory results with the superexchange parameters: J1/kB=-1.32 K, J2/kB=-0.41 K, zJ′/kB=-0.20 K, and g=2.02. The agreement factor defined by R=∑(χmTexp-χmTcalc)2/∑(χmTexp)2 is 7.54× 10-4. These values confirm the presence of antiferro-magnetic interaction between the Mn(Ⅱ) ions within a trinuclear subunit. The inercluster magnetic interaction (zJ′) is rather small, indicating that the exchange interactions between two magnetic clusters are very weak, which is probably due to a long separation (1.023 4(5) nm) of the adjacent magnetic subunits. In compounds 1 and 2, there is one type of the magnetic exchange pathway within the Ni4 and Mn3 units, namely via double μ2-η1:η1-carboxylate (syn-syn) bridges (Fig. 2 and 5).

    In summary, two new coordination compounds, namely [Ni2(μ3-Hbptc)(Hbptc)(phen)3(H2O)]2·4H2O (1) and {[Mn3(μ4-cptc)2(2, 2′-bipy)2(H2O)4]·2H2O}n (2), have been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. The compounds feature the 0D tetranuclear and 1D chain structures, respectively. Magnetic studies show an antiferromagnetic coupling between the adjacent metal centers.

    1. [1]

      Huang Y B, Liang J, Wang X S, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46:126-157 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00250A

    2. [2]

      Meng X, Wang H N, Song S Y, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46:464-480 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00528D

    3. [3]

      Wen H M, Cui Y J, Zhou W, et al. Adv. Mater., 2016, 28:8819-8860 doi: 10.1002/adma.v28.40

    4. [4]

      Cui Y, Yue Y, Qian G, et al. Chem. Rev., 2012, 112:1126-1162 doi: 10.1021/cr200101d

    5. [5]

      Kuppler R J, Timmons D. J, Fang Q R, et al. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253:3042-3066 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.019

    6. [6]

      Ji P F, Manna K, Lin Z, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138:12234-12242 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06759

    7. [7]

      Gu J Z, Cui Y H, Liang X X, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16:4658-4670 doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00735

    8. [8]

      Gu J Z, Gao Z Q, Tang Y. Cryst. Growth Des., 2012, 12:3312-3323 doi: 10.1021/cg300442b

    9. [9]

      Gu J Z, Wu J, Lv D Y, et al. Dalton Trans., 2013, 42:4822-4830 doi: 10.1039/c2dt32674d

    10. [10]

      Du M, Li C P, Liu C S, et al. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2013, 257:1282-1305 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.002

    11. [11]

      Gu J Z, Liang X X, Cui Y H, et al. CrystEngComm, 2017, 19:117-128 doi: 10.1039/C6CE02115H

    12. [12]

      Lee J, Kang Y J, Cho N S, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16:996-1004 doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01544

    13. [13]

      Li S D, Lu L P, Su F. Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2016, 35:1920-1928

    14. [14]

      冯上发, 何鑫, 秦涛, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(11):2095-2102 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.241FENG Shang-Fa, HE Xin, QIN Tao, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(11):2095-2102 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.241

    15. [15]

      Su F, Lu L P, Feng S S, et al. Dalton Trans., 2015, 44:7213-7222 doi: 10.1039/C5DT00412H

    16. [16]

      Tian H, Wang K, Jia Q X, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2011, 11:5167-5170 doi: 10.1021/cg200752v

    17. [17]

      Spek A L. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C:Struct. Chem., 2015, C71:9-18

    18. [18]

      Thompson L K, Niel V, Grove H. Polyhedron, 2004, 23:1175-1184 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2004.01.022

    19. [19]

      Kahn O. Molecular Magnetism. New York: VCH Publishers Inc., 1993: 211

    20. [20]

      Hsu K F, Wang S L. Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39:1773-1778 doi: 10.1021/ic991340s

  • Scheme 1  Coordination modes of Hbptc2-/cptc3- ligands in compounds 1 and 2

    Figure 1  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 1 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids

    H atoms and lattice water molecules were omitted for clarity except those of COOH groups; Symmetry codes: A: -x+1, -y, -z+1

    Figure 2  Tetranuclear nickel(Ⅱ) unit

    Phen ligands are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: -x+1, -y, -z+1

    Figure 3  Perspective of 3D supramolecular framework viewed from b axis in 1

    Phen ligands are omitted for clarity; Dotted lines represent the H-bonds; Symmetry codes: A: x-1, y-1, z; B: -x+1, -y+1, -z

    Figure 4  Drawing of the asymmetric unit of compound 2 with 30% probability thermal ellipsoids

    H atoms were omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: x, y+1, z; B: -x, -y+1, -z; C: -x, -y, -z

    Figure 5  Trinuclear Mn(Ⅱ) unit in compound 2

    Symmetry codes: A: -x, -y+1, -z

    Figure 6  One dimensional chain along a axis in compound 2

    2, 2′-bipy ligands are omitted for clarity; Symmetry codes: A: -x, -y+1, -z; B: x, y+1, z; C: -x, -y+2, -z; D: x, y-1, z; E: -x, -y, -z

    Figure 7  TGA curves of compounds 1 and 2

    Figure 8  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 1

    Red curve represents the best fit to the equations in the text; Blue line shows the Curie-Weiss fitting

    Figure 9  Temperature dependence of χMT (○) and 1/χM(□) vs T for compound 2

    Red curve represents the best fit to the equations in the text; Blue line shows the Curie-Weiss fitting

    Table 1.  Crystal data for compounds 1 and 2

    Compound 1 2
    Chemical formula C66H46Ni2N6O15 C48H40Mn3N6O18
    Molecular weight 1 280.51 1 153.68
    Crystal system Triclinic Triclinic
    Space group P1 P1
    a/nm 1.243 18(6) 0.719 34(4)
    b/nm 1.422 15(10) 1.023 41(5)
    c/nm 1.662 89(11) 1.739 84(11)
    α/(°) 95.289(6) 96.993(5)
    β/(°) 96.231(5) 101.237(5)
    γ/(°) 108.755(5) 106.819(5)
    V/nm3 2.742 1(3) 1.180 71(13)
    Z 2 1
    F(000) 1 320 589
    θ range for data collection/(°) 3.244-25.049 3.409-25.050
    Limiting indices -14 ≤ h ≤ 14, -16 ≤ k ≤ 16, -19 ≤ l ≤ 15 -8 ≤ h ≤ 8, -12 ≤ k ≤ 12, -18 ≤ l ≤ 20
    Reflection collected, unique (Rint) 17 820, 9 694 (0.061 9) 7 235, 4 178 (0.031 6)
    Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.551 1.623
    μ/mm-1 0.768 0.876
    Data, restraint, parameter 9 694, 0, 804 4 178, 0, 340
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.039 1.060
    Final R indices [I≥2σ(I)]R1, wR2 0.074 3, 0.153 2 0.043 8, 0.081 8
    R indices (all data)R1, wR2 0.134 7, 0.196 3 0.061 6, 0.091 5
    Largest diff. peak and hole/(e·nm-3) 1 173 and -461 426 and -560
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and bond angles (°) for compounds 1 and 2

    1
    Ni(1)-O(1) 0.207 9(3) Ni(1)-O(2)A 0.207 O(4) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.212 2(4)
    Ni(1)-N(2) 0.207 9(5) Ni(1)-N(3) 0.207 3(5) Ni(1)-N(4) 0.211 8(5)
    Ni(2)-O(6) 0.204 9(4) Ni(2)-O(7) 0.221 2(4) Ni(2)-O(8) 0.211 7(4)
    Ni(2)-O(13) 0.202 8(4) Ni(2)-N(5) 0.206 9(5) Ni(2)-N(6) 0.205 9(5)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(3) 98.3O(17) O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(2) 88.22(18) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(2) 170.67(18)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-O(1) 88.08(14) N(3)-Ni(1)-O(1) 96.01(15) N(2)-Ni(1)-O(1) 90.84(16)
    O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(4) 174.09(17) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(4) 78.83(19) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(4) 94.05(19)
    O(1)-Ni(1)-N(4) 97.32(16) O(2)A-Ni(1)-N(1) 87.61(16) N(3)-Ni(1)-N(1) 94.15(19)
    N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 79.39(19) O(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 169.44(18) N(4)-Ni(1)-N(1) 87.46(17)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-O(6) 91.43(18) O(13)-Ni(2)-N(6) 103.13(18) O(6)-Ni(2)-N(6) 95.08(19)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-N(5) 91.4O(19) O(6)-Ni(2)-N(5) 174.41(19) N(6)-Ni(2)-N(5) 79.58(19)
    O(13)-Ni(2)-O(8) 156.13(17) O(6)-Ni(2)-O(8) 83.04(17) N(6)-Ni(2)-O(8) 100.49(18)
    N(5)-Ni(2)-O(8) 96.23(18) O(13)-Ni(2)-O(7) 95.71(17) O(6)-Ni(2)-O(7) 89.44(17)
    N(6)-Ni(2)-O(7) 160.49(19) N(5)-Ni(2)-O(7) 95.08(18) O(8)-Ni(2)-O(7) 61.17(16)
    2
    Mn(1)-O(1) 0.210 2(2) Mn(1)-O(5)A 0.214 6(2) Mn(1)-O(7) 0.213 2(2)
    Mn(1)-N(1)A 0.226 7(3) Mn(1)-N(2) 0.230 1(3) Mn(1)-N(3) 0.232 3(3)
    Mn(1)-O(2) 0.220 2(2) Mn(1)-O(2)B 0.220 2(2) Mn(1)-O(4)A 0.213 4(2)
    Mn(1)-O(4)C 0.213 4(2) Mn(1)-O(8) 0.223 1(3) Mn(1)-O(8)B 0.223 1(3)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-O(7) 99.47(10) O(1)-Mn(1)-O(5)A 90.87(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-O(5)A 163.79(9)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-N(1)A 103.66(9) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(1)A 91.28(9) O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(1)A 74.06(9)
    O(1)-Mn(1)-N(2) 86.36(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(2) 93.64(10) O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(2) 99.48(10)
    N(1)A-Mn(1)-N(2) 167.97(11) O(1)-Mn(1)-N(3) 156.17(10) O(7)-Mn(1)-N(3) 88.7O(10)
    O(5)A-Mn(1)-N(3) 86.72(10) N(1)A-Mn(1)-N(3) 98.46(10) N(2)-Mn(1)-N(3) 70.71(10)
    O(4)C-Mn(2)-O(2) 87.09(9) O(4)A-Mn(2)-O(2) 92.91(9) O(4)C-Mn(1)-O(8)B 93.19(9)
    O(4)A-Mn(1)-O(8)B 86.81(9) O(2)-Mn(1)-O(8)B 89.65(9) O(2)-Mn(1)-O(8) 90.35(9)
    Symmetry codes: A:-x+1, -y, -z+1 for 1; A: x, y+1, z; B: -x, -y+1, -z; C: -x, -y, -z for 2.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 3.  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 1

    D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    O(4)-H(4)…O(9)A 0.082 0.168 0.248 2 163.0
    O(12)-H(12)…O(8)B 0.082 0.180 0.254 7 151.1
    O(13)-H(1W)…O(9)C 0.085 0.175 0.259 7 179.8
    O(13)-H(2W)…O(5) 0.085 0.177 0.262 2 179.7
    O(14)-H(3W)…O(3)D 0.085 0.195 0.280 5 179.3
    Symmetry codes: A:-x-1, y-1, z; B: -x+1, -y+1, -z; C: x-1, y, z; D: x+1, y+1, z.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 4.  Hydrogen bond parameters of compound 2

    D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠DHA/(°)
    O(7)-H(1W)…O(6)A 0.086 0.198 0.276 4 151.5
    O(7)-H(2W)…O(9)B 0.085 0.184 0.268 8 179.2
    O(8)-H(3W)…O(3)C 0.090 0.209 0.286 5 143.5
    Symmetry codes: A: x-1, y+1, z; B: x-1, y, z; C: x+1, y+1, z.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 文章访问数:  1388
  • HTML全文浏览量:  139
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2018-05-10
  • 收稿日期:  2017-12-01
  • 修回日期:  2018-03-17
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章