Electro-reductive C-H cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones

Ling Ding ,  Kaikai Niu ,  Yuxiu Liu ,  Qingmin Wang

Citation:  Ling Ding, Kaikai Niu, Yuxiu Liu, Qingmin Wang. Electro-reductive C-H cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022, 33(8): 4057-4060. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.053 shu

Electro-reductive C-H cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones

English

  • The cyanoalkyl moiety is of great significance in organic synthesis, it represents one privileged class of structural scaffolds in several nitrile-containing pharmaceuticals (Fig. 1) [1, 2]. Therefore, efforts to introduce a cyanoalkyl group into structurally diverse molecules have attracted much attention [3, 4].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Representative pharmaceuticals containing alkylnitrile scaffold.

    Recently, the ring-opening reaction of cyclobutanone oxime derivatives, which has emerged as a powerful tool to realize cyanoalkylation reactions, comes into the spotlight [5-9]. For instance, Nishimura and Uemura [10, 11] developed a palladium-catalyzed system using the ring strain of the cyclobutane skeleton to deliver nitriles. In addition, the pioneering work conducted by Boivin et al. [12, 13] utilized cyclobutanone sulfenylimines and carboxymethyl oximes to trigger C-C bond cleavage with radical initiators or UV irradiation. Other investigations have also involved transition metal [14-20] or photoredox catalysis (Scheme 1A) [21-34]. Nevertheless, the addition of sophisticated metal catalysts and precious metal-based catalysts in photocatalytic reactions limits their practical applications.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Methods for redox of cyclobutanone oxime derivatives.

    Electrochemical technique has long been hailed as an environmentally benign method due to their inherent ability to achieve redox reactions sustainably [35-38]. To date, the direct electroreduction of cyclobutanone oxime derivatives has not been achieved. Therefore, building upon our previous research in organic radical chemistry [39-42, we now report a mild electrochemical protocol for the C-H cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones (Scheme 1B).

    Optimization studies began using 1-methylquinoxalin-2(1H)-one (1a) and cyclobutanone O-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl) oxime (2a). In its final manifestation, an 80% isolated yield of 3-(3-cyanopropyl)−1-methyl-quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (3a) could be obtained under a constant-voltage of 3 V when graphite plates as the electrodes, DMA as the solvent, and nBu4NBF4 (2.0 equiv.) as the electrolyte were applied (entry 1). At the outset, control experiments indicated that electricity (entry 2) and electrolyte (entry 3) were critical. Both nBu4NPF6 and nBu4ClO4 resulted in noticeable decreases in the overall reaction yield (entries 4 and 5). A solvent screen revealed that MeOH and DMF almost quenched the reaction (entries 6 and 7), while MeCN only marginally affected the yield (entry 8). Decreasing the amount of nBu4NBF4 or the amount of 2a lowered the yield (entries 9 and 10). Interestingly, constant-voltage of 3 V seemed to be significant for the reaction (entry 11).

    Under the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 1), we investigated the scope and generality of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones (Scheme 2). Various substrates bearing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups (methyl, fluoro, chloro, bromo and trifluoromethyl) on the aromatic rings efficiently engaged in this reaction to afford the corresponding products 3b–3h in moderate to good yields. N-Unsubstituted quinoxalin-2(1H)-one was also successfully converted to the desired product 3i in 91% yield. Quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones with ethyl, butyl, allyl, propargyl, benzyl, ethoxycarbonylmethyl or benzoyl methyl groups on nitrogen were also suitable for this reaction (3j–3p).

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions.a
    DownLoad: CSV

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  Substrate scope of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (0.6 mmol), DMA (5 mL), undivided cell with two graphite electrodes (each 1.0 × 1.0 cm2), room temperature (r.t.), 3 V, 36 h. Isolated yields are reported.

    Next, we turned our attention to exploring the cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-one 1a with various cyclobutanone oxime esters 2 (Scheme 3). A variety of cyclobutanone oxime esters containing benzyloxy and ester groups at the 3-position of cyclobutanone reacted well to give the target products 4a–4e in moderate yields. It is noteworthy that carbamate (NHBoc) also survived the reaction to yield the desired product 4f. Moreover, disubstituted substrates with large steric hindrance groups were capable of yielding 4g and 4h.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Substrate scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (0.6 mmol), DMA (5 mL), undivided cell with two graphite electrodes (each 1.0 × 1.0 cm2), room temperature (r.t.), 3 V, 36 h. Isolated yields are reported.

    To demonstrate the utility and practicality of this electrochemical protocol, we used the device to perform a gram-scale reaction on a 5 mmol scale in 61% yield of 3a using the above-described conditions (Scheme 4).

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4.  Gram-scale of synthesis of 3a.

    Several experiments were performed to gain insight into the reaction mechanism. Firstly, radical trapping experiments were conducted by the addition of (2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) to the reactions of 1a and 2a, respectively (Scheme 5a). Both additives halted the reactions to some degree, and the radical trapping product 3ad was detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry. Secondly, when 1, 1′-(1, 2-ethenediyl) dibenzene was subjected to electrolysis in the presence of 2a under the standard conditions, a 41% isolated yield of the addition-compound 5 was obtained (Scheme 5b), which indicated that the cyanoalkyl radical was formed. Thirdly, the cyclic voltammetry showed that the reduction potential of substrate 2a was −1.64 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) (Fig. 2), while reduction potential of the cathode was −1.75 V relatively, which means 2a can be reduced at the surface of the cathode under standard reaction condition.

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5.  Mechanistic studies.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Cyclic voltammetry.

    On the basis of the above experimental observations, a plausible mechanism was proposed for the cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (Scheme 6). The reaction begins with single-electron reduction of 2a at the cathode, affording iminyl radical Ⅰ, which undergoes C−C bond cleavage to form cyanoalkyl radical Ⅱ. Subsequently, the radical addition of Ⅱ to 1a leads to radical intermediate Ⅲ, which then undergoes single-electron oxidation at the anode followed by loss of H+ to form product 3a.

    Scheme 6

    Scheme 6.  Proposed mechanism.

    In summary, a practical electro-reductive protocol for the direct C–H cyanoalkylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones via iminyl radical-mediated ring opening has been developed. A variety of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones and cyclobutanone oxime esters can be applied in this environmentally benign reaction. Furthermore, it may provide a reasonable method for medicinal synthesis in the future.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21732002, 22077071) and Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, Nankai University (No. 63181206) for generous financial support for our programs.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.053.


    1. [1]

      F.F. Fleming, Nat. Prod. Rep.16 (1999) 597–606. doi: 10.1039/a804370a

    2. [2]

      F.F. Fleming, L. Yao, P.C. Ravikumar, L. Funk, B.C. Shook, J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010) 7902–7917. doi: 10.1021/jm100762r

    3. [3]

      R. Lopez, C. Palomo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 13170–13184. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502493

    4. [4]

      Z. Wang, X. Xun, W. Xiao, J. Chen, J. Mol. Sci. 37 (2021) 9–23. doi: 10.1117/12.2602695

    5. [5]

      X. Wu, C. Zhu, Chem. Rec. 18 (2018) 587–598. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201700090

    6. [6]

      H. Yan, C. Zhu, Sci. China Chem. 60 (2017) 214–222. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-0399-5

    7. [7]

      F. Xiao, Y. Guo, Y. Zeng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 120–143. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202001093

    8. [8]

      X. Yu, J. Chen, W. Xiao, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 506–561. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00030

    9. [9]

      J. Chen, Y. Liang, P. Wang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 13382–13392. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c06535

    10. [10]

      T. Nishimura, S. Uemura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2020) 12049–12050.

    11. [11]

      T. Nishimura, Y. Nishiguchi, Y. Maeda, S. Uemura, J. Org. Chem. 69 (2004) 5342–5347. doi: 10.1021/jo049385k

    12. [12]

      J. Boivin, E. Fouquet, S.Z. Zard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 1055–1057. doi: 10.1021/ja00003a057

    13. [13]

      J. Boivin, E. Fouquet, S.Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett. 32 (1991) 4299–4302.

    14. [14]

      T. Nishimura, T. Yoshinaka, Y. Nishiguchi, Y. Maeda, S. Uemura, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 2425–2427. doi: 10.1021/ol0507120

    15. [15]

      H.B. Yang, N. Selander, Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 1779–1783. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605636

    16. [16]

      B. Zhao, Z. Shi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 12727–12731. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707181

    17. [17]

      L. Yang, P. Gao, X. Duan, Y. Gu, L. Guo, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 1034–1037. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03984

    18. [18]

      W. Ai, Y. Liu, Q. Wang, Z. Lu, Q. Liu, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 409–412. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03707

    19. [19]

      D. Ding, Y. Lan, Z. Lin, C. Wang, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 2723–2730. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00692

    20. [20]

      N. Zhou, S. Wu, K. Kuang, M. Wu, M. Zhang, Org. Biomol. Chem. 19 (2021) 4697–4700. doi: 10.1039/d1ob00610j

    21. [21]

      X. Yu, P. Wang, D. Yan et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 360 (2018) 3601–3606. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201800834

    22. [22]

      B. Zhao, X. Kong, B. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett. 60 (2019) 2063–2066. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2019.06.059

    23. [23]

      X. Yu, Q. Zhao, J. Chen, J. Chen, W. Xiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 15505–15509. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809820

    24. [24]

      F.L. Vaillant, M. Garreau, S. Nicolai, et al., Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 5883–5889. doi: 10.1039/C8SC01818A

    25. [25]

      M. Dauncey, S.P. Morcillo, J.J. Douglas, N.S. Sheikh, D. Leonori, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 744–748. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710790

    26. [26]

      X. Shen, J. Zhao, S. Yu, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 5523–5527. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02540

    27. [27]

      P. Xia, Y., Hu, Z., Ye, et al., J. Org. Chem. 85 (2020) 3538–3547. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b03251

    28. [28]

      W. Zhang, Yu. Pan, C. Yang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 84 (2019) 7786–7795. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00657

    29. [29]

      W. Zhang, Yu. Pan, C. Yang, X. Li, B. Wang, Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 2765–2770. doi: 10.1039/c9qo00625g

    30. [30]

      Y. Jian, M. Chen, C. Yang, W. Xia, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020 (2020) 1439–1442. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201900406

    31. [31]

      X.J. Wei, C. Wu, Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 3083–3094. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.035

    32. [32]

      P. Wang, Y. Gao, J. Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 1815–1824.

    33. [33]

      P. Wang, X. Wu, Y. Cheng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 22956–22962. doi: 10.1002/anie.202110084

    34. [34]

      P. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Xiong, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 19 (2021) 3181–3190. doi: 10.1039/d1ob00142f

    35. [35]

      Y. Yuan, J. Yang, A. Lei, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 10058–10086. doi: 10.1039/d1cs00150g

    36. [36]

      L. Ackermann, Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 84–104. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00510

    37. [37]

      J. Siu, N. Fu, S. Lin, Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 547–560. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00529

    38. [38]

      K. Jiao, Y. Xing, Q. Yang, H. Qiu, T. Mei, Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 300–310. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00603

    39. [39]

      J. Dong, Z. Wang, X. Wang, et al., Sci. Adv. 5 (2019) eaax9955.

    40. [40]

      K. Niu, L. Song, Y. Hao, Y. Liu, Q. Wang, Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 11673–11676. doi: 10.1039/d0cc05391k

    41. [41]

      K. Niu, Y. Hao, L. Song, Y. Liu, Q. Wang, Green Chem. 23 (2021) 302–306. doi: 10.1039/d0gc03892j

    42. [42]

      K. Niu, L. Ding, P. Zhou, et al., Green Chem. 23 (2021) 3246–3249. doi: 10.1039/d1gc00861g

  • Figure 1  Representative pharmaceuticals containing alkylnitrile scaffold.

    Scheme 1  Methods for redox of cyclobutanone oxime derivatives.

    Scheme 2  Substrate scope of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (0.6 mmol), DMA (5 mL), undivided cell with two graphite electrodes (each 1.0 × 1.0 cm2), room temperature (r.t.), 3 V, 36 h. Isolated yields are reported.

    Scheme 3  Substrate scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (0.6 mmol), DMA (5 mL), undivided cell with two graphite electrodes (each 1.0 × 1.0 cm2), room temperature (r.t.), 3 V, 36 h. Isolated yields are reported.

    Scheme 4  Gram-scale of synthesis of 3a.

    Scheme 5  Mechanistic studies.

    Figure 2  Cyclic voltammetry.

    Scheme 6  Proposed mechanism.

    Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions.a

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 文章访问数:  1728
  • HTML全文浏览量:  128
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-08-15
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-12
  • 接受日期:  2021-12-22
  • 修回日期:  2021-12-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-12-26
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章