Thermal benzene activation by 3d transition metal (Sc-Cu) oxide cations

Jiatong Cui Yue Zhao Ming Wang Shanshan Wang Jiabi Ma

Citation:  Cui Jiatong, Zhao Yue, Wang Ming, Wang Shanshan, Ma Jiabi. Thermal benzene activation by 3d transition metal (Sc-Cu) oxide cations[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020, 31(3): 779-782. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.05.015 shu

Thermal benzene activation by 3d transition metal (Sc-Cu) oxide cations

English

  • In the atmosphere, aromatic hydrocarbons are an important fraction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [1], among which benzene (C6H6) is the simplest but ubiquitous pollutant. Mineral dust particles including various metal oxides provide adsorption sites of VOCs, and reactive surfaces for heterogeneous reactions [2, 3]. The oxidation reactions of VOCs such as benzene can result in the formation of oxygenated products with lower volatilities and these highly-oxidized compounds are quite important to the generation of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) [4, 5]. SOAs are one of the major components throughout the haze-fog episodes in China [6], and particle-phase reactions are one of important processes of the SOA formation [7, 8]. Vanadium, manganese, nickel, chromium, and copper are abundant heavy metals found in the atmosphere in the north of China [9, 10], and there are various reactive oxide species on the mineral oxide surfaces, which are key species of atmospheric chemistry [11]. Apart from the above mentioned transition metal oxides, Fe2O3 as well as TiO2 are also typical mineral aerosols. It is quite desirable to obtain the detailed reaction kinetic data and reaction mechanisms to understand the intrinsic properties of reaction centers of mineral dust aerosols at a molecular level and offer basic parameters for atmospheric models. However, the enormous complexities of environmental factors and relative reaction products render the reactions as well as the nature of active centers obscure.

    Gas-phase experiments conducted under properly defined conditions provide an ideal arena for probing the energtics and kinetics of a reaction at a strictly molecular level [12-22]. Investigations on benzene oxidation by gas-phase ions and clusters gives fundamental insights for how benzene molecules can be activated and the nature of active sites. There are some reports about the reactions of metal ions [23-38], metal clusters [32, 36, 39], and several transition metal oxide ions [40-43] with benzene. Large amount of experimental efforts have been devoted to the study of 3d transition metal atoms (M = Sc-Ni) interacting with C6H6, and sandwich and rice-ball structures for Mn(C6H6)m were observed [25]. In addition, the adsorption, C-H bond activation [44], dehydrogenation and dissociation processes [24, 45, 46] of benzene molecules mediated by gas-phase ions and clusters were also reported. Notably, there is a lack of clear picture about the reactivity of small 3d transition metal oxide cluster (TMOC) cations toward C6H6 in the literature, which is useful in elucidating compositions of reactive clusters, the reaction trends and the possible oxidative ability of mineral aerosols.

    In this study, we systematically investigate 103 reactions of first-row transition metal oxide cations MxOy+ (M = Sc-Cu, x = 1–6) with C6H6 in the linear ion trap at near room temperature. Thirtynine clusters show high reactivity toward benzene and display up to six primary reaction channels, as shown in Scheme 1a: 1) adsorption channel, 2) dehydrogenation of C6H6, 3) charge exchange, 4) hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), 5) oxygen atom transfer (OAT) and 6) the formation of C6H5O radical. In addition to MxOyC6H6+, five types of oxidation products are generated during these reactions, that is, C6H4 unit, C6H5· (phenyl) radical, C6H6O0, 1+ cations, C6H6O· and C6H5O· radical. The adsorption channel exists in most of the investigated cluster cations under our experimental conditions, except for ScO3+, MnO4+ and other 25 inert clusters (Table S1 in Supporting information), and this pathway will not be included in the following discussion. Generally speaking, only series of scandium oxide clusters and vanadium oxide clusters exhibit similar reactivity toward benzene in the 39 reactive 3d TMOC cations; however, more than two types of reactions coexist in other 3d TMOCs. CoxOy+ and CrxOy+ cations exhibit variety of the products in the reactions with C6H6. The number of reactive MnxOy+ and NixOy+ clusters is the least. The detailed reaction channels will be discussed in the following.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Simplified reaction channels for the reactions of MxOy+ (M = Sc-Cu cluster cations (a) and atmospheric OH· radicals (b) with benzene.

    As shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 (Supporting information), dehydrogenation of C6H6 is prevalent in the C6H6 oxidation reactions mediated by the reactive metal oxide cations, except for ScxOy+ clusters. The pseudo-first order rate coefficients (k1) [47], which were estimated on the basis of a least-square fitting procedure (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), and the reaction efficiencies (Φ= k1/kcalc; kcalc is the theoretical collision rate [48, 49]) for these reactions are given in Table 1 and Table S2 (Supporting information). Among the investigated clusters, Ti2O4+, (V2O5)13+, (V2O5)0-1VO3+ [47] CrxOy+ (x, y = 1, 2; 2, 5; 2, 6; 3, 2; 3, 8), Mn2O3+, FeO4+, Fe2O3+, CoxOy+ (x, y = 2, 2; 2, 5; 3, 4; 4, 5; 5, 7), Ni5O5+, as well as Cu5O3+ and Cu6O4+ can induce dehydrogenation of C6H6, with the formation of MxOy-1C6H4+ and H2O. The estimated rate constants varied from 10-9 cm3 molecule-1 s-1 to 10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1, and branching ratios (BRs) of this channel dramatically changes from 1.3% for Cr2O6/C6H6 to 78% for V3O8+/C6H6 [50]. More information of reactivity and reaction channels is shown in Fig. 2. Based on the reported B3LYP-calculated results for the reactions of V2O5+ and VO3+ with C6H6, the dehydrogenation pathway proceeds by two steps of C-O bond making and two steps of hydrogen atom abstraction alternately, with the formation of OH moiety and H2O unit successively [50]. The formed C6H4 unit is bonded with two oxygen atoms of oxide clusters by forming a ···-M-O-C-C-O-··· ring in the product [50]. Similar reaction mechanisms may be followed for other reactive TMOCs. Normally, a small change in cluster composition can completely change the reactive properties of the clusters [51, 52]. Herein, the dehydrogenation of C6H6 generally exists in various 3d TMOC cations, and the reactive clusters contain both of oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor ones. Like Cr3O2+, which is very oxygen deficient, can even offer one oxygen atom to form H2O unit in the C6H6 oxidation reactions. Unlike the reactions of stoichiometric early TMOC cations with CH4 [53], no uniform structural compositions can be summed up for these reactive 3d TMOCs. In addition, the dehydrogenation of C6H6 is one of the major channels (BR > 25%) in most of the investigated reactions. In literature, there are some oxide ions which also can bring about the dehydrogenation of C6H6, such as FeO+[54], MnO+ [40], V2O5 and (V2O5)02VO3 [42], and the branching ratios of this channel for MnO+ and FeO+ are only 10% and 5%, respectively.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Time-of-flight mass spectra for the reactions of the mass-selected Sc4O6+ (a), Ti3O7+ (b), Cr3O2+(c), Co3O4+(d) and Cu3O2+(e) with C6H6, respectively. The reaction time and the C6H6 pressures are given. The peaks marked with stars are present in the background spectra.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Products, pseudo-first-order rate constants, and reaction efficiencies for the investigated reactions.
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Map showing of the reactivity and reaction channels for 3d transition metal oxide cations with C6H6. The red number shown in each block represents the oxygen atoms y in MxOy+ cations. The blank block means these clusters have not been investigated.

    In addition to dehydrogenation of C6H6, charge exchange channel is also observed in many investigated 3d TMOC cations, and two kinds of products C6H6+ and C6H6O+ are present, as shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1. For V3O8+, V5O13+, Cr2O6+, Cr4O11+ and Ni4O5+, the charge exchange channel is concomitant with the OAT channel, resulting to the formation of C6H6O+ ions as the products of the reactions with C6H6. For the reactions of (V2O5)13+, CrxOy+ (x, y = 1, 2; 2, 5; 2, 6; 3, 2; 3, 8; 4, 10; 4, 11), MnO2+ and CoxOy+ (x, y = 1, 4; 2, 3; 2, 5) with C6H6, C6H6+ cations are the reaction products. The charge transfer happens when cluster cations collide with benzene molecules [50], and this channel is closely related to the ionization energies (IEs) of benzene, phenol and relative neutral TMOCs. If C6H6+ is present in the mass spectra, the IEs of neutral TMOCs can be assigned as larger than that of C6H6. Mass discrimination effect due to large mass difference between C6H6O0, 1+ and oxide clusters makes it difficult to exhibit the precise intensity of C6H6+ in some reactions, and this phenomenon is more serious for larger clusters. Thus, it is hard to accurately compare the productions of C6H6O0, 1+ for the reactions of the small clusters with those of the larger clusters. This charge exchange channel also takes place in the reactions of benzene with Co+, Cu+, Nb+ [55] and Au+ [37] ions, forming C6H6+ cations. However, the pathway of generating C6H6O+ has not been reported in the studies of C6H6 oxidation reaction mediated by gas-phase clusters. In the atmosphere, charge exchange reactions, such as H + O+ →H+ + O and O2+ + NO →O2 + NO+, have been studied extensively [56]. From our gas-phase reactions, one may expect that this reaction type may also exist between mineral oxides and some VOC molecules, such as C6H6. Then the formed C6H6+ radical cations can further react fast with other atmospheric radicals through radical reactions.

    Different from the generally existing pathways 1–3 in Scheme 1a, the HAT process prevails predominantly only in (Sc2O3)15+/C6H6 systems, with the formation of (Sc2O3)15H+ and C6H5 (Fig. 1a and Fig. S1). The Sc8O12+ is the most reactive one and the BRs for this HAT channel varied from 38% (for Sc10O15+) to 90% (for Sc6O9+). As reported in literature, Δ≡2ynx + q (q: the charge number, n: the highest oxidation state of element M') can be used to classify oxygen-richness or -poorness of early transition metal oxide clusters M'xOyq [15, 57], and the Δ = 1 clusters (Sc2O3)n+, which possess oxygen-centered radicals (O), can activate the C H bond of C4H10 [58]. Although the C H bond energy (BE) of C6H6 (4.89 eV) is higher than that of CH4 (4.55 eV) [59], there is no doubt that O plays a key role for the HAT process in (Sc2O3)n+/ benzene systems. Larger scandium oxide cluster cations with stoichiometry of (Sc2O3)n may also be able to activate C6H6 through HAT, which is not further investigated herein. Among other studied early TMOC cations with Δ = 1, such as (V2O5)1-4+ and (CrO3)1, 2+, only (V2O5)1-4+ clusters can abstract one hydrogen atom from C6H6, and this channel is not the dominant one [50]. Schwarz et al. pointed out that an increase or decrease in electronic multiplicity of the bare MO+ (M = Sc-Ni) coincides with a similar trend in the richness and variety of the products formed in the reactions with C6H6 [40]. However, this phenomenon is not suitable for the benzene oxidation on polynuclear metal oxide cation clusters studied herein.

    It is interesting that in benzene oxidation reactions with FeO2+, Co2O3+, Co3O4+, Cu2O2+ and Cu4O3+ clusters (MxOy+), oxygen atom transfer accompanying HAT happens, leading to the formation of C6H5O radicals and MxOy-1H+ cations [60]. Note that the bond dissociation energies of FeO+, CoO+, and CuO+ are relatively weak in the first-row transition metal monoxide ions MO+ [61]. According to the thermodynamic requirement that must be met by these MxOy+, the reactive M-O bond energies for MxOy+ should be within this range: BE(M–O) < BE(C6H5–O)-BE(C6H5–H) = (8.126-4.896) eV = 3.23 eV (The bonds energy for C6H5–O is calculated at the B3LYP/6-311++G** level of theory, and that for C6H5–H is from Ref. [60]). Besides, we systematically studied the reactions of nanosized vanadium oxide cluster cations with benzene, and phenol is the product; surprisingly, the size is not the major factors influencing the clusters' reactivities [50].

    In the atmosphere, OH· radicals are one of the most important oxidant, and there are lots of products observed from the OH· radical-initiated reactions of benzene [62], which leads to the removal of benzene and other VOC molecules from the atmosphere or transformation in the atmosphere. For instance, in Scheme 1b, the abstraction pathway can form H2O and a phenyl radical in OH·/benzene system, accounting for 5% of the overall reaction at 298 K [63, 64]. The C6H5· radical can further react with O2 to produce C6H5O· (C6H5· + O2 →C6H5O· + O, Progress (2)). The following reaction C6H5O· +M →C5H5· + CO + M (Progres (3)) will obtain cyclopentadienyl (C5H5·)radical, which is a key intermediate species for aromatic ring growth [65]. Phenol is also generated via OH· addition reaction to benzene (Progress (4)). Three (intermediate) products for OH· +C6H6 were also observed in our gas-phase model reactions, such as C6H5· radical, C6H5O· radical, and C6H5OH. In contrast, H2O is formed through breaking of two C-H bonds in benzene and generating of C-O bonds in cluster reactions, and this dehydrogenation channel is generally present with large BRs. Therefore, the mechanisms and BRs of dehydrogenation in benzene oxidation reactions mediated by OH· radical and 3d TMOC cations are different. Physical adsorption by mineral dusts is the one of major sinks for VOC molecules [65], and the adsorption channels are also generally present in most of the investigated cluster cations. Based on the cluster reactions, other two types of channels existing in gas-phase cluster/C6H6 systems, that is, charge exchange and dehydrogenation, may contribute to the correspond-ing VOC oxidation reactions in the atmosphere. From these results, we may speculate that similar reaction types observed in OH·+C6H6 in the atmosphere may also exist in the heterogeneous reactions of benzene molecules over mineral dusts, but the mechanisms and importance of each channels may be different; there are also some specific reactions on mineral oxide surfaces, which are not present in the gas-phase reaction of OH· with C6H6. These ring-retaining radical products obtained in the benzene oxidation reactions can further react with other radicals or species in the atmosphere.

    In summary, we systematically investigate 103 reactions of small 3d transition metal oxide cations with C6H6 by using mass spectrometry, and a clear picture of the reactivity of TMOCs toward benzene is built. As summarized in Fig. 2, a total of 39 cations can oxidize C6H6 efficiently, with the rate constants being in the order of 10-9–10-10 cm3 molecule -1 s -1, regardless of adsorption channel. The shade of color indicates the approximate range of reaction rates. And the darker the color, the faster the reaction. The blank block means these clusters have not been investigated. As shown in Fig. 2, In the obtained six primary reaction channels, dehydrogenation of benzene and charge transfer between cations and C6H6 generally exist in the investigated reactions, and the formation of C6H6O+ has not been reported previously. In comparison with hydroxyl radical, the most important gas-phase oxidant in the atmosphere, three (intermediate) products are observed in the reactions of TMOCs with benzene, that is, C6H5· radical, C6H5O· radical, and phenol. The reaction information is particularly valuable for gauging of future nano- and multiscale modeling of benzene oxidation over mineral oxide aerosols in the atmosphere, and one may expect that the heterogeneous conver-sion of VOCs such as C6H6 on mineral dusts is indispensable.

    This work was supported by National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0203000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21503015), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 22050205, 2017CX01008).

    Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2019.05.015.


    1. [1]

      J.G. Calvert, R. Atkinson, K.H. Becker, et al., The Mechanisms of Atmospheric Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.

    2. [2]

      C.R. Usher, A.E. Michel, V.H. Grassian, Chem. Rev. 103(2003) 4883-4939. doi: 10.1021/cr020657y

    3. [3]

      T. Kameda, E. Azumi, A. Fukushima, et al., Sci. Rep.-UK 6(2016) 1-10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8

    4. [4]

      J.L. Jimenez, M.R. Canagaratna, N.M. Donahue, et al., Science 326(2009) 1525-1529. doi: 10.1126/science.1180353

    5. [5]

      E. Borrás, L.A. Tortajada-Genaro, Atmos. Environ. 47(2012) 154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.020

    6. [6]

      G. Wang, R. Zhang, M.E. Gomez, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 48(2016) 13630-13635.

    7. [7]

      M. Kalberer, D. Paulsen, M. Sax, et al., Science 303(2004) 1659-1662. doi: 10.1126/science.1092185

    8. [8]

      B. Zheng, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14(2015) 2031-2049.

    9. [9]

      J. Duan, J. Tan, Atmos. Environ. 74(2013) 93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.031

    10. [10]

      H.Z. Tian, C.Y. Zhu, J.J. Gao, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15(2015) 12107-12166. doi: 10.5194/acpd-15-12107-2015

    11. [11]

      H.J. Tong, P.S.J. Lakey, A.M. Arangio, et al., Faraday Discuss. 200(2017) 251-270. doi: 10.1039/C7FD00023E

    12. [12]

      H. Schwarz, Catal. Sci. Technol. 7(2017) 4302-4314. doi: 10.1039/C6CY02658C

    13. [13]

      H. Schwarz, S. Shaik, J.L. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(2017) 17201-17212. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10139

    14. [14]

      S.M. Lang, T.M. Bernhardt, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14(2012) 9255-9269. doi: 10.1039/c2cp40660h

    15. [15]

      X.L. Ding, X.N. Wu, Y.X. Zhao, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 45(2012) 382-390. doi: 10.1021/ar2001364

    16. [16]

      R.A.J. O'Hair, G.N. Khairallah, J. Cluster Sci. 15(2004) 331-363. doi: 10.1023/B:JOCL.0000041199.40945.e3

    17. [17]

      J. Roithová, D. Schröder, Chem. Rev. 110(2010) 1170-1211. doi: 10.1021/cr900183p

    18. [18]

      A.W. Castleman Jr., Catal. Lett. 141(2011) 1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s10562-011-0670-7

    19. [19]

      S. Yin, E.R. Bernstein, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 321-322(2012) 49-65.

    20. [20]

      N. Dietl, M. Schlangen, H. Schwarz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(2012) 5544-5555. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108363

    21. [21]

      D. Caraiman, G.K. Koyanagi, D.K. Bohme, J. Phys. Chem. A 108(2004) 978-986. doi: 10.1021/jp0307194

    22. [22]

      P. Cheng, A. Shayesteh, D.K. Bohme, Cheminform 40(2010) 241-246.

    23. [23]

      G.K. Koyanagi, D.K. Bohme, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 227(2003) 563-575. doi: 10.1016/S1387-3806(03)00091-5

    24. [24]

      X.P. Xing, Z.X. Tian, H.T. Liu, et al., Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17(2003) 1743-1748. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1115

    25. [25]

      T. Hanmura, M. Ichihashi, T. Kondow, J. Phys. Chem. A 106(2002) 11465-11469. doi: 10.1021/jp021275z

    26. [26]

      T. Kurikawa, H. Takeda, M. Hirano, et al., Organometallics 18(2012) 1430-1438.

    27. [27]

      D. Caraiman, D.K. Bohme, J. Phys. Chem. A 106(2002) 9705-9717. doi: 10.1021/jp0208900

    28. [28]

      D.J. Trevor, R.L. Whetten, D.M. Cox, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107(1985) 518-519. doi: 10.1021/ja00288a049

    29. [29]

      M.R. Zakin, D.M. Cox, R.O. Brickman, et al., J. Phys. Chem. 93(1989) 6823-6827. doi: 10.1021/j100355a048

    30. [30]

      Y. Huang, B.S. Freiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112(1990) 1682-1685. doi: 10.1021/ja00161a004

    31. [31]

      X.P. Xing, H.T. Liu, Z.C. Tang, PhysChemComm 6(2003) 32-35. doi: 10.1039/b302761a

    32. [32]

      C. Berg, M. Beyer, U. Achatz, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 108(1998) 5398-5403. doi: 10.1063/1.475972

    33. [33]

      S. Roszak, D. Majumdara, K. Balasubramaniana, J. Phys. Chem. A 103(1999) 5801-5806. doi: 10.1021/jp9907950

    34. [34]

      X.P. Xing, Z. Tian, H.T. Liu, et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 107(2003) 8484-8491.

    35. [35]

      H.T. Liu, S.T. Sun, X.P. Xing, et al., Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 20(2006) 1899-1904. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2524

    36. [36]

      M. Tombers, L. Barzen, G. Niednerschatteburg, J. Phys. Chem. A 117(2013) 1197.

    37. [37]

      Y.P. Ho, R.C. Dunbar, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 182-183(1999) 175-184.

    38. [38]

      R.C. Dunbar, G.T. Uechi, B. Asamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116(1994) 2466-2470. doi: 10.1021/ja00085a029

    39. [39]

      L. Barzen, M. Tombers, C. Merkert, et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 330-332(2012) 271-276.

    40. [40]

      M.F. Ryan, D. Stoeckigt, H. Schwarz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116(1994) 9565-9570. doi: 10.1021/ja00100a021

    41. [41]

      C. Heinemann, H.H. Cornehl, D. Schroder, et al., Inorg. Chem. 35(1996) 2463-2475. doi: 10.1021/ic951322k

    42. [42]

      F. Dong, S. Heinbuch, Y. Xie, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(2009) 1057-1066. doi: 10.1021/ja8065946

    43. [43]

      K.A. Zemski, R.C. Bell, A.W. Castleman, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 184(1999) 119-128. doi: 10.1016/S1387-3806(98)14276-8

    44. [44]

      B. Butschke, H. Schwarz, Organometallics 30(2011) 1588-1598. doi: 10.1021/om101138d

    45. [45]

      K. Judai, M. Hirano, H. Kawamata, et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 270(1997) 23-30. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00336-9

    46. [46]

      G.S. Jackson, F.M. White, C.L. Hammill, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119(1997) 7567-7572. doi: 10.1021/ja970218u

    47. [47]

      Z.Y. Li, Z. Yuan, X.N. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(2014) 14307-14313. doi: 10.1021/ja508547z

    48. [48]

      G. Kummerlöwe, M.K. Beyer, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 244(2005) 84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.03.012

    49. [49]

      T. Su, M.T. Bowers, J. Chem. Phys. 58(1973) 3027-3037. doi: 10.1063/1.1679615

    50. [50]

      J.T. Cui, Y. Zhao, J.C. Hu, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 149(2018) 074308. doi: 10.1063/1.5038175

    51. [51]

      S.M. Lang, D.M. Popolan, T.M. Bernhardt, Chem. Phys. Solid Surf. 12(2007) 53-90. doi: 10.1016/S1571-0785(07)12002-2

    52. [52]

      M. Arenz, S. Gilb, U. Heiz, Chem. Phys. Solid Surf. 12(2007) 1-51. doi: 10.1016/S1571-0785(07)12001-0

    53. [53]

      Y.X. Zhao, X.N. Wu, Z.C. Wang, et al., Chem. Commun. 46(2010) 1736-1738. doi: 10.1039/b924603g

    54. [54]

      S. Detlef, S. Helmut, Helv. Chim. Acta 75(1992) 1281-1287. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19920750429

    55. [55]

      H. Higashide, T. Oka, K. Kasatani, et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 163(1989) 485-489. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85173-5

    56. [56]

      N.S. Shuman, D.E. Hunton, A.A. Viggiano, Chem. Rev. 115(2015) 4542. doi: 10.1021/cr5003479

    57. [57]

      Y.X. Zhao, X.N. Wu, J.B. Ma, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13(2011) 1925-1938. doi: 10.1039/c0cp01171a

    58. [58]

      X.N. Wu, B. Xu, J.H. Meng, et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 310(2012) 57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2011.11.011

    59. [59]

      Y.R. Luo, Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007.

    60. [60]

      J.T. Cui, C.X. Sun, Y. Zhao, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21(2019) 1117-1122. doi: 10.1039/C8CP06807K

    61. [61]

      D. Schröder, H. Schwarz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34(1995) 1973-1995. doi: 10.1002/anie.199519731

    62. [62]

      R. Atkinson, J. Arey, Chem. Rev. 103(2003) 4605-4638. doi: 10.1021/cr0206420

    63. [63]

      R. Atkinson, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26(1997) 215-290. doi: 10.1063/1.556012

    64. [64]

      T. Seta, M. Nakajima, A. Miyoshi, J. Phys. Chem. A 110(2006) 5081-5090. doi: 10.1021/jp0575456

    65. [65]

      X. Shen, Y. Zhao, Z. Chen, et al., Atmos. Environ. 68(2013) 297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.027

  • Scheme 1  Simplified reaction channels for the reactions of MxOy+ (M = Sc-Cu cluster cations (a) and atmospheric OH· radicals (b) with benzene.

    Figure 1  Time-of-flight mass spectra for the reactions of the mass-selected Sc4O6+ (a), Ti3O7+ (b), Cr3O2+(c), Co3O4+(d) and Cu3O2+(e) with C6H6, respectively. The reaction time and the C6H6 pressures are given. The peaks marked with stars are present in the background spectra.

    Figure 2  Map showing of the reactivity and reaction channels for 3d transition metal oxide cations with C6H6. The red number shown in each block represents the oxygen atoms y in MxOy+ cations. The blank block means these clusters have not been investigated.

    Table 1.  Products, pseudo-first-order rate constants, and reaction efficiencies for the investigated reactions.

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 文章访问数:  1415
  • HTML全文浏览量:  32
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2020-03-01
  • 收稿日期:  2019-04-16
  • 接受日期:  2019-05-07
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-05-07
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章