Citation: Wang Lei, Zhao Dongdong, Liu Xu, Yu Peng, Fu Honggang. Hydrothermal for Synthesis of CoO Nanoparticles/Graphene Composite as Li-ion Battery Anodes[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, ;2017, 75(2): 231-236. doi: 10.6023/A16090476 shu

Hydrothermal for Synthesis of CoO Nanoparticles/Graphene Composite as Li-ion Battery Anodes

Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080

Corresponding author: Fu Honggang, fuhg@vip.sina.com
Received Date: 6 September 2016
Revised Date: 21 January 2017

Fund Project: Harbin science and technology innovation talents research Foundation 2015RAQXJ057application technology research and development projects in Harbin 2013AE4BW051Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 21371053, 21401048the international science & technology cooperation program of China 2014DFR41110

Figures(6)

Nowadays, the clean energy is of special concern researches owing to the unavoidable environmental pollutions. To satisfy the demand of sustainable development strategy, it is necessary to develop high-efficient and portable energy storage and conversion devices. Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are considered as most promising electrochemical energy storage system in this era and are anticipated to power the mentioned applications. Herein, a facile and effective route has been developed for synthesis of CoO/reduced graphite oxide (RGO) composites as LIB anodes. In the synthesis, the GO prepared by the modified Hummers' method was dissolved into deionized water, and then mixed with Co(NO₃)₂ solution. Subsequently, the obtained homogeneous solution was transferred into 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. The sealed autoclave was putted into an oven at 160℃ for 6 h. After cooled down to room temperature, the precursor of depositions were filtered, washed with deionized water and dried at 80℃. Finally, the precursor was thermal treated at 500℃ for 2 h in a tube furnace under nitrogen ambient to obtain the final product of CoO/RGO composites. The synthetic composites were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). XRD patterns proved that the composites were composed of CoO and graphene. SEM images indicated the CoO nanoparticles grown on the graphene nanosheets uniformly. The CoO nanoparticles loaded on the surface of graphene nanosheets could prevent the aggregation of graphene. Meanwhile, the graphene nanosheets could combine with each other to form a large 3D electron conductive network, which can promote the electrical conductivity of the composite. The LIB was assembled in glove-box, in which the composite electrode and metal lithium plate were used as the anode and the cathode, respectively. The electrochemical test results imply that the initial discharge specific capacity could be up to 1312.6 mAh·g^-1 at a current density of 100 mA·g^-1. Notably, the discharge specific capacity is still about 557.4 mAh·g^-1 after 300 cycles at a high current density of 10000 mA·g^-1. It is demonstrated that the composite exhibits high specific capacity, excellent rate capability and well cyclic stability. The 3D network could be used as a stable framework to accommodate the volume change of active material during Li⁺ insertion/extraction, which play important role for the superior electrochemical performance.
- cobalt oxide,
- graphene,
- composite,
- Li-ion batteries,
- anode materials
1   引言

清洁可靠的能源供应方式已成为21世纪最重要的关注点之一, 这是由于它与人们的日常生活、全球的环境与经济以及人类的健康息息相关^[1～9]. 尽管基于燃烧的能源技术在满足我们的能源需求方面一直占据主导地位, 但是其仍然存在增加温室气体排放量以及环境污染等问题. 即将面临的化石燃料的短缺以及日益增长的环境问题促使科研工作者积极探索和利用可持续、清洁和高效的技术来进行能量的供应和存储^[10～16].

锂离子电池作为重要的电力能源存储设备, 已经引起了全世界的研究兴趣^[17～27]. 目前, 锂离子电池通常采用廉价的石墨为负极材料^[28～32]. 但是其存在理论比容量小(372 mAh•g^-1)、首次放电效率低且稳定性较差等问题^[33～37], 限制了其在商业领域的实际应用, 因此有必要开发高性能电极材料. 石墨烯是一种新型的二维材料, 具有优异的导电性及特殊的纳米片层结构^[38～41]. 石墨烯是通过氧化石墨(GO)高温加热制得, 氧化石墨烯表面具有大量的含氧基团、羟基、环氧官能团, 这些含氧官能团的存在使得氧化石墨烯表面带有负电荷, 有利于石墨烯与氧化物之间的复合. 具有不同尺寸及形貌的过渡金属氧化物与石墨烯的复合材料已被广泛应用于锂离子电池负极材料^[42～45]. 由于协同作用与界面相互作用的结果, 石墨烯与氧化物的复合材料可以改善电池的充放电比容量、倍率特性以及循环稳定性.

本研究工作中我们制备了CoO和石墨烯(RGO)的复合材料, 并研究了其储锂性能. 首先采用Hummers法制备了GO, 将其在水中分散均匀再与Co(NO₃)₂溶液混合. 先采用水热法制备了前驱体, 再将得到的前驱体在氮气气氛下进行热处理, 最终得到CoO/RGO复合材料. 作为锂电负极, 展现了较高的比容量、优异的倍率性能及循环稳定性, 这源自于CoO和RGO之间的协同效应及界面作用. 该材料在锂离子电池负极材料中具有潜在的应用价值.

2   结果与讨论

2.1   CoO/RGO复合材料的结构表征

X射线衍射 (XRD)是表征材料晶相组成的有效手段. CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3三个复合材料的XRD如图 1所示. 其中, 衍射角2θ在42.3°和44.5°的两个峰为CoO晶相的特征衍射峰, 衍射角2θ在25°左右的宽峰为石墨烯(RGO)的特征衍射峰, 这表明我们成功合成了CoO/RGO复合材料. 为了研究石墨烯的存在对复合材料储锂性能的影响, 我们在制备过程中没有加入氧化石墨(GO), 得到的是Co₃O₄晶相, 并且具有较好的结晶度(如图 1所示). 这是由于GO的还原作用, 导致在合成过程中加入GO时钴的晶相由Co₃O₄向CoO转变.

图 1 Co₃O₄, CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2和CoO/RGO3样品的XRD图 Figure 1. XRD patterns of Co₃O₄, CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2 and CoO/RGO3 samples

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

扫描电子显微镜(SEM)用于表征样品的微观形貌及结构. 图 2为Co₃O₄, CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3样品的SEM图. 如图 2(A)所示, 纯的Co₃O₄呈现了表面具有丰富孔的薄片结构. 然而对于CoO/RGO复合材料来说, 如图 3(B～D)所示, 石墨烯呈现了聚集的块状结构, 并且随着GO量的增加这种团聚现象更加明显, 这主要是由于高温热处理导致石墨烯片层团聚. 另外, 可以看出CoO纳米粒子与RGO紧密接触, 这有利于电子的快速传输, 使其储锂性能提高. 透射电子显微镜(TEM)可以用于进一步分析样品的微观结构. 由图 3的TEM照片可以看出, CoO纳米粒子分散在石墨烯片层表面, 与石墨烯片层紧密接触, 这有利于离子电子的传输, 使其储锂性能提高.

图 2 样品的扫描电子显微镜照片: (A) Co₃O₄, (B) CoO/RGO1, (C) CoO/RGO2, (D) CoO/RGO3 Figure 2. SEM images of (A) Co₃O₄, (B) CoO/RGO1, (C) CoO/RGO2 and (D) CoO/RGO3

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

图 3 CoO/RGO2样品的透射电子显微镜照片 Figure 3. TEM image of CoO/RGO2 sample

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

2.2   CoO/RGO复合材料的电化学性能研究

由于石墨烯与金属氧化物之间的协同效应, 金属氧化物与石墨烯的复合材料已经被广泛应用于锂离子电池负极材料中. 为了对材料的储锂性能进行测试, 分别将本实验制得的复合材料CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3以及Co₃O₄作为负极, 锂片作为正极, 将其组装成纽扣电池, 对其进行了恒电流充放电测试. 图 4A表明在电流密度为100 mA•g^-1的条件下, CoO/RGO2电极的首次放电和充电比容量分别能达到1312.6和1084.8 mAh•g^-1, 库伦效率为82.6%; 而二次循环后其放电和充电比容量仍然能够保持在1156.4和1063.7 mAh•g^-1, 库伦效率为92.0%. CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3以及Co₃O₄在不同电流密度下的比容量变化如图 4B所示. 由图中可以明显地看出, 与Co₃O₄相比, CoO/RGO复合材料的放电比容量有了明显的提高, 这是由于RGO的存在增加了电极材料的导电性及活性位点, 这使得电池在充放电过程中锂离子能够更加容易的嵌入和脱出, 进而放电比容量提高, 导电能力增加^{[46, 47]}; 其中, CoO/RGO2电极的比容量要高于CoO/RGO1和CoO/RGO3, 这说明复合材料中适宜的CoO与RGO质量比对其性能有重要的影响.

图 4 样品的电化学性能图: (A)电流密度为100 mA•g^-1时, CoO/RGO2电极的充放电曲线; (B) CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3以及Co₃O₄电极在电流密度为100～1000 mA•g^-1的比容量变化; (C)在电流密度为1000 mA•g^-1时CoO/RGO2电极循环600圈时的电压-比容量图 Figure 4. Electrochemical performances of the synthetic samples: (A) Charge-discharge profiles for CoO/RGO2 electrode at a current density of 100 mA• g^-1; (B) Rate capability for CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3 and Co₃O₄ electrodes at different current density ranging from 100 to 1000 mA•g^-1. (C) Cyclic performance for CoO/RGO2 electrode at current densities of 1000 mA•g^-1 for 600 cycles

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

图 4C是电流密度为1000 mA•g^-1时CoO/RGO2电极循环600圈时的比容量变化图, 可以明显看出在前450圈循环过程中, CoO/RGO2的比容量是逐渐增加的, 这种比容量的增加对于金属氧化物来说是比较常见的^[48～51]. 450圈之后, 比容量基本没有变化, 库伦效率保持在99%以上, 说明CoO/RGO2优异的循环稳定性, 这主要归因于CoO与RGO之间的协同效应. 另外, 合成的复合材料比文献报道的CoO性能高很多^{[52, 53]}, 进一步说明了CoO与RGO之间的协同作用对于材料的储锂性能提高是非常重要的.

电池的倍率性能是评价其性能的重要标准之一, 图 5为CoO/RGO2电极在大电流放电速率时比容量随循环次数的变化图. 由图 5A不同电流密度下的比容量变化可以看出, 随着电流密度由2000 mA•g^-1向50000 mA• g^-1逐渐增加, CoO/RGO2电极展现了优异的倍率特性. 在电流密度为2000 mA•g^-1时, 其放电和充电比容量分别为615.8和619.9 mAh•g^-1, 库伦效率为99.3%. 即使是在50000 mA•g^-1的高电流密度下, 其放电和充电比容量分别可以达到216.9和216.2 mAh•g^-1, 库伦效率为99.9%以上. 当电流密度再降至2000 mA•g^-1时, 其放电和充电比容量分别为618.8和616.3 mAh•g^-1, 库伦效率为99.6%. 说明CoO/RGO2电极的可逆容量较高. 在10000 mA•g^-1的大电流密度下测试其循环性能, 如图 5B所示, 随着循环次数的增加其放电和充电比容量是逐渐增加的, 当循环达到270圈以后, 比容量趋于稳定, 最终稳定在557.4 mAh•g^-1. 此外, 可以看出在循环测试的过程中, 库伦效率一直保持在98%～99.9%, 说明CoO/RGO2电极具有较好的循环稳定性及高的可逆性.

图 5 CoO/RGO2的电化学性能图: (A)大电流密度下(2000～50000 mA•g^-1)的比容量与循环圈数的关系; (B) 电流密度10000 mA•g^-1下的循环稳定性及库伦效率(≈99%) Figure 5. (A) Rate capability at different current density ranging from 2000 to 50000 mA•g^-1; (B) Cycling performance at current densities of 10000 mA•g^-1with Coulombic efficiency of 99%

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

电池的电化学阻抗谱图(EIS)及循环伏安测试如图 6所示. 图 6A可以看出所有的EIS谱图均包括一个高频区域的半圆形和低频区域的斜线. 高频区域的半圆形主要包括界面电荷传递阻抗(R_ct)和SEI 膜阻抗(R_SEI), 而低频区域的斜线主要归因于锂离子的扩散阻抗. 半圆形的半径越小、斜率越大, 说明锂离子能够更快地扩散传输通过SEI 膜、加快电荷转移的反应速率. 从图中可以明显地看出, 与复合材料相比, Co₃O₄具有更低的界面电荷传递阻抗和SEI 阻抗, 这一现象是由于氧化石墨很难被完全还原, 还原后的石墨烯表面仍然具有很多含氧基团, 导致复合物的导电性并没有纯的Co₃O₄好. 但是由于纯的Co₃O₄其没有与石墨烯复合, 因此在电化学测试中稳定性较差. 在氧化物与石墨烯的复合材料中, CoO/RGO2样品的阻值介于CoO/RGO1和CoO/RGO3之间, 又由于其适当的CoO含量, 因此CoO/RGO2复合材料具有优异的倍率性能和循环稳定性. 图 6B的循环伏安可以看出在扫速为0.1 mV•s^-1的条件下, CoO/RGO2复合材料充放电循环1～5圈时, 其循环伏安曲线几乎重合, 这进一步证明了其具有极好的循环稳定性. 石墨烯基复合材料是一种层层自组装的纳米结构, 这种结构更加有利于电子和离子的运输, 能够促进反应的快速进行. 更重要的是, CoO与石墨烯的紧密接触能够扩大活性物质的接触面积以及活性位点, 因此使复合材料的储锂性能有了很大的提高. Co₃O₄具有最低的界面电荷传递阻抗, 但倍率性能却最差, 而加入石墨烯的三组样品随着石墨烯含量的增加, 界面电阻反而增大.

图 6 (A) Co₃O₄, CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2, CoO/RGO3电极的交流阻抗谱图(EIS); (B) CoO/RGO1样品的循环伏安图, 电压范围在0.01～3.0 V, 扫速为1 mV•s^-1 Figure 6. (A) Nyquist plots of Co₃O₄, CoO/RGO1, CoO/RGO2 and CoO/RGO3 electrodes; (B) CVs of CoO/RGO1 electrode scanned between 0.01～3.0 V (vs. Li⁺/Li) at a scan rate of 1 mV•s^-1

图选项

下载全尺寸图像

下载幻灯片

3   结论

总之, 我们采用简单的一步法成功制备了CoO/RGO复合材料作为锂离子电池的负极材料. CoO纳米粒子与石墨烯片层之间的有效复合, 使该材料具有比容量高、倍率性能好及循环稳定性好的特点. 在CoO/RGO复合材料中, 石墨烯片层能够形成空间的导电网络从而提高复合材料的电子传导特性. 又由于其具有优异的机械性能, 因此石墨烯的存在能够起到稳定材料的结构、提高材料循环稳定性的作用. 另外, 石墨烯片层与片层之间的间隙有利于电解液的充分浸润, 能够使活性物质与电解液充分接触, 从而可以有效缩短Li⁺的传输距离. 本研究工作提供了一种简单、有效的方法制备高性能锂离子电池负极材料, 为降低锂离子电池的成本提供了新思路.

4   实验部分

4.1   CoO/RGO复合材料的制备

称取一定量的石墨微粉, 采用改进的Hummers法制备氧化石墨(GO), 酸洗三次、水洗至中性, 烘干备用. 准确称取10 mg GO加入到50 mL去离子水中, 超声分散均匀后, 倒入30 mL浓度为0.1 mol/L的Co(NO₃)₂溶液中, 搅拌30 min. 将上述混合溶液倒入100 mL反应釜中, 在160 ℃温度下反应6 h. 反应完成后冷却至室温后抽滤, 将得到的固体粉末用去离子水洗三次、无水乙醇洗一次, 随后将其置于80 ℃烘箱中进行干燥处理. 然后在氮气气氛下以5 ℃•min^-1的升温速率加热到500 ℃, 并恒温2 h制备了CoO/RGO1复合物. 为了研究GO的用量对样品结构和性能的影响, 我们将GO的用量调节为20 mg和30 mg, 其它合成条件不变, 分别制备了CoO/RGO2和CoO/RGO3两个样品.

4.2   材料表征

采用X射线粉末衍射仪(XRD)对样品的晶相组成进行分析, 仪器型号为德国布鲁克公司生产的Bruker D8型X-射线衍射仪, 检测器为LynxEye型号, 测试条件为Cu Kα (λ＝1.5406 Å). 采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察样品的微观形貌和结构, 测试的加速电压为5 kV, 仪器型号为HitachiS-4800. 采用透射电子显微镜(TEM)观察样品的微观结构, 测试的加速电压为200 kV, 仪器型号为日本电子公司生产的JEM-2100.

4.3   电池组装及测试

将实验所需的正负极外壳、垫片、弹簧片加入到乙醇中, 在超声频率为10 kHz、超声功率为400 W条件下, 进行充分的洗涤, 超声时间为3～4 h, 待样品洗净后将乙醇倒出, 再用乙醇洗涤两次, 随后将其置于80 ℃烘箱中进行干燥处理, 待冷却至室温后送入真空手套箱中. CoO/RGO复合材料与乙炔黑、聚偏二氟乙烯(PVDF)按照8∶1∶1的质量比混合均匀, 再加入数滴有机溶剂NMP (N-甲基-吡咯烷酮), 充分搅拌成均匀糊状物后, 将其均匀涂覆于铜箔上, 在80 ℃下真空干燥12 h. 将涂有RGO/CoO复合材料的铜箔为负极, 金属锂片为正极, 六氟磷锂溶液[乙烯碳酸酯(EC)∶碳酸甲乙酯(EMC)∶碳酸二甲酯(DMC)＝1∶1∶1(体积比)]为电解液. 在充满高纯氩气的手套箱内, 将其组装成扣式电池, 随后使用封口机将电池密封好. 待电池静置12 h后, 用CT2001A蓝电电池测试仪对扣式电池进行恒流充放电性能测试, 电压范围为0.01～3.00 V. 用Autolab PGSTAT302N电化学工作站进行循环伏安和交流阻抗测试.

References
1. [1]
  Nishi, Y. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 406.
2. [2]
  Choi, N.-S.; Chen, Z.; Freunberger, S. A.; Ji, X.; Sun, Y.-K.; Amine, K.; Yushin, G.; Nazar, L. F.; Cho, J.; Bruce, P. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9994.
3. [3]
  Cabana, J.; Monconduit, L.; Larcher, D.; Rosa Palacin, M. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E170.
4. [4]
  Lu, Y.; Wen, Z.; Rui, K.; Wu, X.; Cui, Y. J. Power Sources 2013, 244, 306.
5. [5]
  Li, C.; Yin, C.; Mu, X.; Maier, J. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 962.
6. [6]
  Rui, K.; Wen, Z.; Lu, Y.; Shen, C.; Jin, J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1819.
7. [7]
  Li, H.; Liang, M.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1098.
8. [8]
  Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Hou, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, W.; Chen, D.; Shen, G. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 1073.
9. [9]
  Arun, N.; Jain, A.; Aravindan, V.; Jayaraman, S.; Ling, W. C.; Srinivasan, M. P.; Madhavi, S. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 69.
10. [10]
  Arun, N.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Madhavi, S. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 240.
11. [11]
  Han, J.-T.; Goodenough, J. B. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 3404.
12. [12]
  Lu, X.; Jian, Z.; Fang, Z.; Gu, L.; Hu, Y.-S.; Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2638.
13. [13]
  Guo, B.; Yu, X.; Sun, X.-G.; Chi, M.; Qiao, Z.-A.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.-S.; Yang, X.-Q.; Goodenough, J. B.; Dai, S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2220.
14. [14]
  Tang, K.; Mu, X.; PvanAken, A.; Yu, Y.; Maier, J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 49.
15. [15]
  Han, J.-T.; Huang, Y.-H.; Goodenough, J. B. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2027.
16. [16]
  Jayaraman, S.; Aravindan, V.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Ling, W. C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Madhavi, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8660.
17. [17]
  Fei, L.; Xu, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Xie, P.; Deng, S.; Smirnov, S.; Luo, H. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 11102.
18. [18]
  Jo, C.; Kim, Y.; Hwang, J.; Shim, J.; Chun, J.; Lee, J. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3508.
19. [19]
  Aravindan, V.; Sundaramurthy, J.; Jain, A.; Kumar, P. S.; Ling, W. C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Srinivasan, M. P.; Madhavi, S. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1858.
20. [20]
  Cheng, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Si, L.; Guo, C.; Qian, Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17258.
21. [21]
  Xie, H.; Park, K.-S.; Song, J.; Goodenough, J. B. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 19, 135.
22. [22]
  Cussen, E. J.; Yi, T. W. S. J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 1832.
23. [23]
  Satish, R.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Goodenough, J. B.; Madhavi, S. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301715.
24. [24]
25. [25]
26. [26]
27. [27]
28. [28]
  Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Hartung, S.; Bucher, N.; Madhavi, S. Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 878.
29. [29]
  Luo, J.-Y.; Cui, W.-J.; He, P.; Xia, Y.-Y. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 760.
30. [30]
  Arun, N.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Madhavi, S. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 603, 48.
31. [31]
  Gong, Z.; Yang, Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3223.
32. [32]
  Masquelier, C.; Croguennec, L. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6552.
33. [33]
  Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Chem. Mater. 2009, 22, 587.
34. [34]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, G. J.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y. G.; Lee, Y. S. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 210.
35. [35]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, K. J.; Aravindan, V.; Cho, W. I.; Lee, Y. S. J Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 4, 583.
36. [36]
  Cho, A. R.; Son, J. N.; Aravindan, V.; Kim, H.; Kang, K. S.; Yoon, W. S.; Kim, W. S.; Lee, Y. S. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 6556.
37. [37]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, G. J.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, S. H.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y. G.; Lee, Y. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, A87.
38. [38]
  Wu, Z. S.; Zhou, G. M.; Yin, L. C.; Ren, W. C.; Li, F.; Cheng, H. M. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 107.
39. [39]
  Zhu, J.; Zhang, G. H.; Yu, X. Z.; Li, Q. H.; Lu, B.; Xu, Z. Nano Energy 2014, 3, 80.
40. [40]
  Shen, B.; Zhai, W. T.; Zheng, W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4542.
41. [41]
  Shu, K. W.; Wang, C. Y.; Wang, M.; Zhao, C.; Wallace, G. G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1325.
42. [42]
  Xu, W.; Xie, Z.; Cui, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, L.; Dietrich, G.; Dooley, K. M.; Wang, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22533.
43. [43]
  Park, G. D.; Kang, Y. C. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9179.
44. [44]
  Mo, R.; Lei, Z.; Sun, K.; Rooney, D. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2084.
45. [45]
  Guan, X.; Nai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, J.; Guo, L. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5958.
46. [46]
  Kong, D. Z.; Luo, J. S.; Wang, Y. L.; Ren, W. N.; Yu, T.; Luo, Y. S.; Yang, Y. P.; Cheng, C. W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3815.
47. [47]
  Yin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Hao, F.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Fan, R.; Qi, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4176.
48. [48]
  Zhou, G.; Wang, D.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Li, N.; Wu, Z.; Wen, L.; Lu, G. Q.; Cheng, H. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5306.
49. [49]
  Taberna, P. L.; Mitra, S.; Poizot, P.; Simon, P.; Tarascon, J. M. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 567.
50. [50]
  Zhou, J.; Song, H.; Ma, L.; Chen, X. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 782.
51. [51]
  Zhan, L.; Wang, S.; Ding, L.-X.; Li, Z.; Wang, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19711.
52. [52]
  Chen, M.; Xia, X.; Qi, M.; Yuan, J.; Yin, J.; Chen, Q. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 125.
53. [53]
  Jena, A.; Penki, T. R.; Munichandraiah, N.; Shivashankar, S. A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 761, 21.
1. [1]
  Nishi, Y. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 406.
2. [2]
  Choi, N.-S.; Chen, Z.; Freunberger, S. A.; Ji, X.; Sun, Y.-K.; Amine, K.; Yushin, G.; Nazar, L. F.; Cho, J.; Bruce, P. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9994.
3. [3]
  Cabana, J.; Monconduit, L.; Larcher, D.; Rosa Palacin, M. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E170.
4. [4]
  Lu, Y.; Wen, Z.; Rui, K.; Wu, X.; Cui, Y. J. Power Sources 2013, 244, 306.
5. [5]
  Li, C.; Yin, C.; Mu, X.; Maier, J. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 962.
6. [6]
  Rui, K.; Wen, Z.; Lu, Y.; Shen, C.; Jin, J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1819.
7. [7]
  Li, H.; Liang, M.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1098.
8. [8]
  Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Hou, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, W.; Chen, D.; Shen, G. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 1073.
9. [9]
  Arun, N.; Jain, A.; Aravindan, V.; Jayaraman, S.; Ling, W. C.; Srinivasan, M. P.; Madhavi, S. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 69.
10. [10]
  Arun, N.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Madhavi, S. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 240.
11. [11]
  Han, J.-T.; Goodenough, J. B. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 3404.
12. [12]
  Lu, X.; Jian, Z.; Fang, Z.; Gu, L.; Hu, Y.-S.; Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2638.
13. [13]
  Guo, B.; Yu, X.; Sun, X.-G.; Chi, M.; Qiao, Z.-A.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.-S.; Yang, X.-Q.; Goodenough, J. B.; Dai, S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2220.
14. [14]
  Tang, K.; Mu, X.; PvanAken, A.; Yu, Y.; Maier, J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 49.
15. [15]
  Han, J.-T.; Huang, Y.-H.; Goodenough, J. B. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2027.
16. [16]
  Jayaraman, S.; Aravindan, V.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Ling, W. C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Madhavi, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8660.
17. [17]
  Fei, L.; Xu, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Xie, P.; Deng, S.; Smirnov, S.; Luo, H. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 11102.
18. [18]
  Jo, C.; Kim, Y.; Hwang, J.; Shim, J.; Chun, J.; Lee, J. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3508.
19. [19]
  Aravindan, V.; Sundaramurthy, J.; Jain, A.; Kumar, P. S.; Ling, W. C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Srinivasan, M. P.; Madhavi, S. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1858.
20. [20]
  Cheng, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Si, L.; Guo, C.; Qian, Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17258.
21. [21]
  Xie, H.; Park, K.-S.; Song, J.; Goodenough, J. B. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 19, 135.
22. [22]
  Cussen, E. J.; Yi, T. W. S. J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 1832.
23. [23]
  Satish, R.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Goodenough, J. B.; Madhavi, S. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301715.
24. [24]
25. [25]
26. [26]
27. [27]
28. [28]
  Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Hartung, S.; Bucher, N.; Madhavi, S. Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 878.
29. [29]
  Luo, J.-Y.; Cui, W.-J.; He, P.; Xia, Y.-Y. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 760.
30. [30]
  Arun, N.; Aravindan, V.; Ling, W. C.; Madhavi, S. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 603, 48.
31. [31]
  Gong, Z.; Yang, Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3223.
32. [32]
  Masquelier, C.; Croguennec, L. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6552.
33. [33]
  Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Chem. Mater. 2009, 22, 587.
34. [34]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, G. J.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y. G.; Lee, Y. S. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 210.
35. [35]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, K. J.; Aravindan, V.; Cho, W. I.; Lee, Y. S. J Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 4, 583.
36. [36]
  Cho, A. R.; Son, J. N.; Aravindan, V.; Kim, H.; Kang, K. S.; Yoon, W. S.; Kim, W. S.; Lee, Y. S. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 6556.
37. [37]
  Son, J. N.; Kim, G. J.; Kim, M. C.; Kim, S. H.; Aravindan, V.; Lee, Y. G.; Lee, Y. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, A87.
38. [38]
  Wu, Z. S.; Zhou, G. M.; Yin, L. C.; Ren, W. C.; Li, F.; Cheng, H. M. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 107.
39. [39]
  Zhu, J.; Zhang, G. H.; Yu, X. Z.; Li, Q. H.; Lu, B.; Xu, Z. Nano Energy 2014, 3, 80.
40. [40]
  Shen, B.; Zhai, W. T.; Zheng, W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4542.
41. [41]
  Shu, K. W.; Wang, C. Y.; Wang, M.; Zhao, C.; Wallace, G. G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1325.
42. [42]
  Xu, W.; Xie, Z.; Cui, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, L.; Dietrich, G.; Dooley, K. M.; Wang, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22533.
43. [43]
  Park, G. D.; Kang, Y. C. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9179.
44. [44]
  Mo, R.; Lei, Z.; Sun, K.; Rooney, D. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2084.
45. [45]
  Guan, X.; Nai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, J.; Guo, L. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5958.
46. [46]
  Kong, D. Z.; Luo, J. S.; Wang, Y. L.; Ren, W. N.; Yu, T.; Luo, Y. S.; Yang, Y. P.; Cheng, C. W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3815.
47. [47]
  Yin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Hao, F.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Fan, R.; Qi, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4176.
48. [48]
  Zhou, G.; Wang, D.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Li, N.; Wu, Z.; Wen, L.; Lu, G. Q.; Cheng, H. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5306.
49. [49]
  Taberna, P. L.; Mitra, S.; Poizot, P.; Simon, P.; Tarascon, J. M. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 567.
50. [50]
  Zhou, J.; Song, H.; Ma, L.; Chen, X. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 782.
51. [51]
  Zhan, L.; Wang, S.; Ding, L.-X.; Li, Z.; Wang, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19711.
52. [52]
  Chen, M.; Xia, X.; Qi, M.; Yuan, J.; Yin, J.; Chen, Q. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 125.
53. [53]
  Jena, A.; Penki, T. R.; Munichandraiah, N.; Shivashankar, S. A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 761, 21.
1. [1]
  Zhihuan XU , Qing KANG , Yuzhen LONG , Qian YUAN , Cidong LIU , Xin LI , Genghuai TANG , Yuqing LIAO . Effect of graphene oxide concentration on the electrochemical properties of reduced graphene oxide/ZnS. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1329-1336. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230447
2. [2]
  Xueyu Lin , Ruiqi Wang , Wujie Dong , Fuqiang Huang . 高性能双金属氧化物负极的理性设计及储锂特性. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(3): 2311005-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311005
3. [3]
  Qi Li , Pingan Li , Zetong Liu , Jiahui Zhang , Hao Zhang , Weilai Yu , Xianluo Hu . Fabricating Micro/Nanostructured Separators and Electrode Materials by Coaxial Electrospinning for Lithium-Ion Batteries: From Fundamentals to Applications. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2311030-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311030
4. [4]
  Zhuo WANG , Junshan ZHANG , Shaoyan YANG , Lingyan ZHOU , Yedi LI , Yuanpei LAN . Preparation and photocatalytic performance of CeO₂-reduced graphene oxide by thermal decomposition. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1708-1718. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240067
5. [5]
  Qingtang ZHANG , Xiaoyu WU , Zheng WANG , Xiaomei WANG . Performance of nano Li₂FeSiO₄/C cathode material co-doped by potassium and chlorine ions. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1689-1696. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240115
6. [6]
  Xiangyu CAO , Jiaying ZHANG , Yun FENG , Linkun SHEN , Xiuling ZHANG , Juanzhi YAN . Synthesis and electrochemical properties of bimetallic-doped porous carbon cathode material. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(3): 509-520. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240270
7. [7]
  Yuanchao LI , Weifeng HUANG , Pengchao LIANG , Zifang ZHAO , Baoyan XING , Dongliang YAN , Li YANG , Songlin WANG . Effect of heterogeneous dual carbon sources on electrochemical properties of LiMn_0.8Fe_0.2PO₄/C composites. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(4): 751-760. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230252
8. [8]
  Yuting ZHANG , Zunyi LIU , Ning LI , Dongqiang ZHANG , Shiling ZHAO , Yu ZHAO . Nickel vanadate anode material with high specific surface area through improved co-precipitation method: Preparation and electrochemical properties. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(11): 2163-2174. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240204
9. [9]
  Xinpeng LIU , Liuyang ZHAO , Hongyi LI , Yatu CHEN , Aimin WU , Aikui LI , Hao HUANG . Ga₂O₃ coated modification and electrochemical performance of Li_1.2Mn_0.54Ni_0.13Co_0.13O₂ cathode material. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(6): 1105-1113. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230488
10. [10]
  Junke LIU , Kungui ZHENG , Wenjing SUN , Gaoyang BAI , Guodong BAI , Zuwei YIN , Yao ZHOU , Juntao LI . Preparation of modified high-nickel layered cathode with LiAlO₂/cyclopolyacrylonitrile dual-functional coating. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(8): 1461-1473. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240189
11. [11]
  Yifeng Xu , Jiquan Liu , Bin Cui , Yan Li , Gang Xie , Ying Yang . “Xiao Li’s School Adventures: The Working Principles and Safety Risks of Lithium-ion Batteries”. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(9): 259-265. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202404009
12. [12]
  Siyu Zhang , Kunhong Gu , Bing'an Lu , Junwei Han , Jiang Zhou . Hydrometallurgical Processes on Recycling of Spent Lithium-lon Battery Cathode: Advances and Applications in Sustainable Technologies. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2309028-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309028
13. [13]
  Zhanggui DUAN , Yi PEI , Shanshan ZHENG , Zhaoyang WANG , Yongguang WANG , Junjie WANG , Yang HU , Chunxin LÜ , Wei ZHONG . Preparation of UiO-66-NH₂ supported copper catalyst and its catalytic activity on alcohol oxidation. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(3): 496-506. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230317
14. [14]
  Aoyu Huang , Jun Xu , Yu Huang , Gui Chu , Mao Wang , Lili Wang , Yongqi Sun , Zhen Jiang , Xiaobo Zhu . Tailoring Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces via a Simple Slurry Additive for Stable High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(4): 100037-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202408007
15. [15]
  Zhuo WANG , Xiaotong LI , Zhipeng HU , Junqiao PAN . Three-dimensional porous carbon decorated with nano bismuth particles: Preparation and sodium storage properties. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(2): 267-274. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240223
16. [16]
  Jiaxuan Zuo , Kun Zhang , Jing Wang , Xifei Li . 锂离子电池Ni-Co-Mn基正极材料前驱体的形核调控及机制. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(1): 2404042-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202404042
17. [17]
  Zhenming Xu , Mingbo Zheng , Zhenhui Liu , Duo Chen , Qingsheng Liu . Experimental Design of Project-Driven Teaching in Computational Materials Science: First-Principles Calculations of the LiFePO₄ Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(4): 140-148. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202307022
18. [18]
  Jie XIE , Hongnan XU , Jianfeng LIAO , Ruoyu CHEN , Lin SUN , Zhong JIN . Nitrogen-doped 3D graphene-carbon nanotube network for efficient lithium storage. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(10): 1840-1849. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240216
19. [19]
  Yu Guo , Zhiwei Huang , Yuqing Hu , Junzhe Li , Jie Xu . 钠离子电池中铁基异质结构负极材料的最新研究进展. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(3): 2311015-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311015
20. [20]
  Bowen Yang , Rui Wang , Benjian Xin , Lili Liu , Zhiqiang Niu . C-SnO₂/MWCNTs Composite with Stable Conductive Network for Lithium-based Semi-Solid Flow Batteries. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(2): 100015-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202310024