Citation: Da Wang, Xiaobin Yin, Jianfang Wu, Yaqiao Luo, Siqi Shi. All-Solid-State Lithium Cathode/Electrolyte Interfacial Resistance: From Space-Charge Layer Model to Characterization and Simulation[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, ;2024, 40(7): 230702. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307029 shu

All-Solid-State Lithium Cathode/Electrolyte Interfacial Resistance: From Space-Charge Layer Model to Characterization and Simulation

Da Wang ^1,2 ,
Xiaobin Yin ¹ ,
Jianfang Wu ³ ,
Yaqiao Luo ¹ ,
Siqi Shi ^1,4,,

1.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2.
21C Innovation Laboratory (21C LAB), Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd., Ningde 352100, Fujian Province, China;
3.
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;
4.
Materials Genome Institute, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Corresponding author: Siqi Shi, sqshi@shu.edu.cn
Received Date: 15 July 2023
Revised Date: 21 August 2023
Accepted Date: 28 August 2023

Fund Project: The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3802104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52372208, U2030206, 11874254), and Innovation Laboratory, Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd. (21C-OP-202205).

All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) using inorganic solid electrolytes (SEs) have emerged as crucial components in energy storage applications due to their superior safety and cycle life. In recent years, due to the extensive developments of SEs with high room temperature ionic conductivity (> 10^-3 S·cm^-1), the sluggish diffusion kinetics of lithium ions in SEs are no longer the primary bottleneck impeding the enhancement of ASSBs. On the contrary, the notable resistance at the cathode/SE interface has emerged as a pressing issue demanding immediate resolution. The interfacial resistances arising from various factors, including the formation of the space-charge layer, interfacial chemical reactions, and lack of intimate contact, stand as fundamental reasons for a range of performance deteriorations, such as short cycling life, low coulombic efficiency, and poor power performance. These interconnected aspects further result in differences in the orders of magnitude of the reported interfacial resistances at different fabrication temperatures and/or routes, even within the same material system. Among these factors, the solid-solid contact or chemical reaction degree is closely related to the structural and electronic properties of the selected cathode and SE materials. The observed space-charge layer effect is universal and independent of the specific components or types of ion-conductive materials. Thus, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the physics governing the space-charge layer at the interfaces of ASSBs is pivotal for researchers to fundamentally address the high interfacial resistance stemming from it. This forms the foundation for incorporating other mechanisms (such as interfacial reactions) to more accurately quantify interfacial resistance and expedite interface research in ASSBs. In this review, we strictly derive the theoretical model of the formation of the space-charge layer caused by the inherent chemical potential difference between the cathode and SE from fundamental concepts of (electro)chemical potential and electric potential, and reveal the physical picture of its influence on interfacial resistance. Subsequently, the most recent experimental characterizations and theoretical calculations of the space-charge layer at the cathode/SE interface are comprehensively discussed. While the existence of the space-charge layer is observable through experimentation, its characterization is complicated by factors like loss of interfacial contact and interfacial reactions. Therefore, it becomes imperative to further quantify the concentration of lithium ions in the space-charge layer and its impact on interfacial resistance through theoretical calculations. However, when combining the space-charge layer model with numerical and first-principles calculations to quantitatively study interfacial resistance, accurately determining the interfacial electric potential difference at the cathode/SE interface remains challenging, resulting in several orders of magnitude difference between predicted results and experimental measurements. Consequently, grounded in the foundational physical framework of the interfacial electric potential difference, the intricate connections between this potential difference and the electronic structure of the cathode/SE interface are explored. As a result, a strategy is proposed to ascertain the interfacial electric potential difference by directly calculating the Fermi level of the cathode and SE under real bonding conditions. This endeavor is anticipated to broaden the utility of the space-charge layer model in quantitatively calculating cathode/SE interfacial resistance, offering valuable insights for optimizing the cathode/SE interface and enhancing the overall performance of ASSBs.
- Cathode,
- Solid electrolyte,
- Space-charge layer,
- Interfacial electric-potential difference,
- Interfacial resistance
1. [1]
  (1) Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Dong, S.; Cui, G. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2023, 6 (1), 4. doi:10.1007/s41918-022-00143-9
2. [2]
  (2) Huo, S.; Sheng, L.; Xue, W.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Zhang, H.; Su, B.; Lyu, M.; He, X. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13 (15), 2204343. doi:10.1002/aenm.202204343
3. [3]
  (3) Janek, J.; Zeier, W. G. Nat. Energy 2023, 8 (3), 230. doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01208-9
4. [4]
  (4) Bates, A. M.; Preger, Y.; Torres-Castro, L.; Harrison, K. L.; Harris, S. J.; Hewson, J. Joule 2022, 6 (4), 742. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.007
5. [5]
  (5) Rettenwander, D.; Redhammer, G.; Preishuber-Pflügl, F.; Cheng, L.; Miara, L.; Wagner, R.; Welzl, A.; Suard, E.; Doeff, M. M.; Wilkening, M.; et al. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28 (7), 2384. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00579
6. [6]
  (6) Liang, J.; Chen, N.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Adair, K. R.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Yu, C.; Norouzi Banis, M.; Zhang, L.; et al. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32 (6), 2664. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04764
7. [7]
  (7) Xu, G.; Luo, L.; Liang, J.; Zhao, S.; Yang, R.; Wang, C.; Yu, T.; Wang, L.; Xiao, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Nano Energy 2022, 92, 106674. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106674
8. [8]
  (8) Zou, Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z.; Wang, D.; Cui, Y.; Guo, B.; Li, Y.; Liang, X.; Feng, J.; Li, H.; et al. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (9), 4169. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00760
9. [9]
  (9) Jiang, Y.; Lai, A.; Ma, J.; Yu, K.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, G.; Huang, W.; Wang, C.; Chi, S.; Wang, J.; et al. ChemSusChem 2023, 16 (9), e202202156. doi:10.1002/cssc.202202156
10. [10]
  (10) Gandi, S.; Chidambara Swamy Vaddadi, V. S.; Sripada Panda, S. S.; Goona, N. K.; Parne, S. R.; Lakavat, M.; Bhaumik, A. J. Power Sources 2022, 521, 230930. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230930
11. [11]
  (11) Deng, Z.; Kumar, V.; Bölle, F. T.; Caro, F.; Franco, A. A.; Castelli, I. E.; Canepa, P.; Seh, Z. W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15 (2), 579. doi:10.1039/D1EE02324A
12. [12]
  (12) Wang, L.; Xie, R.; Chen, B.; Yu, X.; Ma, J.; Li, C.; Hu, Z.; Sun, X.; Xu, C.; Dong, S.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 5889. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19726-5
13. [13]
  (13) Yi, J.; He, P.; Liu, H.; Ni, H.; Bai, Z.; Fan, L.-Z. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 52, 202. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.057
14. [14]
  (14) Park, B. K.; Kim, H.; Kim, K. S.; Kim, H.; Han, S. H.; Yu, J.; Hah, H. J.; Moon, J.; Cho, W.; Kim, K. J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12 (37), 2201208. doi:10.1002/aenm.202201208
15. [15]
  (15) Tian, H.-K.; Qi, Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164 (11), E3512. doi:10.1149/2.0481711jes
16. [16]
  (16) Lewis, J. A.; Tippens, J.; Cortes, F. J. Q.; McDowell, M. T. Trends Chem. 2019, 1 (9), 845. doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2019.06.013
17. [17]
  (17) Kim, J.; Kim, M. J.; Kim, J.; Lee, J. W.; Park, J.; Wang, S. E.; Lee, S.; Kang, Y. C.; Paik, U.; Jung, D. S.; et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33 (12), 2211355. doi:10.1002/adfm.202211355
18. [18]
  (18) Jung, S.-K.; Gwon, H.; Lee, S.-S.; Kim, H.; Lee, J. C.; Chung, J. G.; Park, S. Y.; Aihara, Y.; Im, D. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (40), 22967. doi:10.1039/C9TA08517C
19. [19]
  (19) Gao, B.; Jalem, R.; Tateyama, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (10), 11765. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c19091
20. [20]
  (20) Ren, F.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, W.; Zuo, W.; Lin, M.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Gong, Z.; Yang, Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16 (6), 2579. doi:10.1039/D3EE00870C
21. [21]
  (21) Swift, M. W.; Jagad, H.; Park, J.; Qie, Y.; Wu, Y.; Qi, Y. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2022, 26 (3), 100990. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2022.100990
22. [22]
  (22) Maier, J. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88 (11), 1057. doi:10.1002/bbpc.198400007
23. [23]
  (23) Maier, J. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1995, 23 (3), 171. doi:10.1016/0079-6786(95)00004-E
24. [24]
  (24) Wu, J.-F.; Guo, X. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19 (8), 5880. doi:10.1039/C6CP07757A
25. [25]
  (25) Frenkel, J. Kinetic Theory of Liquids; Oxford University Press:Oxford, UK, 1946.
26. [26]
  (26) Lehovec, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21 (7), 1123. doi:10.1063/1.1699148
27. [27]
  (27) Kliewer, K. L.; Koehler, J. S. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140 (4A), A1226. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1226
28. [28]
  (28) Liang, C. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1973, 120 (10), 1289. doi:10.1149/1.2403248
29. [29]
  (29) Dudney, N. J. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1985, 68 (10), 538. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb11520.x
30. [30]
  (30) Maier, J. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1985, 46 (3), 309. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(85)90172-6
31. [31]
  (31) Jow, T.; Wagner, J. B. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1979, 126 (11), 1963. doi:10.1149/1.2128835
32. [32]
  (32) Nakamura, O.; Goodenough, J. B. Solid State Ion. 1982, 7 (2), 119. doi:10.1016/0167-2738(82)90004-2
33. [33]
  (33) Maier, J. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89 (4), 355. doi:10.1002/bbpc.19850890402
34. [34]
  (34) Modine, F. A.; Lubben, D.; Bates, J. B. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 74 (4), 2658. doi:10.1063/1.354657
35. [35]
  (35) Maier, J. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90 (1), 26. doi:10.1002/bbpc.19860900105
36. [36]
  (36) Maier, J.; Lauer, U. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94 (9), 973. doi:10.1002/bbpc.19900940918
37. [37]
  (37) Guo, X.; Vasco, E.; Mi, S.; Szot, K.; Wachsman, E.; Waser, R. Acta Mater. 2005, 53 (19), 5161. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.033
38. [38]
  (38) Guo, X.; Maier, J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19 (1), 96. doi:10.1002/adfm.200800805
39. [39]
  (39) Sata, N.; Eberman, K.; Eberl, K.; Maier, J. Nature 2000, 408 (6815), 946. doi:10.1038/35050047
40. [40]
  (40) Ohta, N.; Takada, K.; Zhang, L.; Ma, R.; Osada, M.; Sasaki, T. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18 (17), 2226. doi:10.1002/adma.200502604
41. [41]
  (41) Balaya, P.; Li, H.; Kienle, L.; Maier, J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2003, 13 (8), 621. doi:10.1002/adfm.200304406
42. [42]
  (42) Maier, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52 (19), 4998. doi:10.1002/anie.201205569
43. [43]
  (43) Maier, J. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4 (11), 805. doi:10.1038/nmat1513
44. [44]
  (44) Li, C.; Gu, L.; Guo, X.; Samuelis, D.; Tang, K.; Maier, J. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (3), 1241. doi:10.1021/nl203623h
45. [45]
  (45) Li, C.; Maier, J. Solid State Ion. 2012, 225, 408. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2012.02.036
46. [46]
  (46) de Klerk, N. J. J.; Wagemaker, M. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 10 (1), 5609. doi:10.1021/acsaem.8b01141
47. [47]
  (47) Cheng, Z.; Liu, M.; Ganapathy, S.; Li, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; He, P.; Zhou, H.; Wagemaker, M. Joule 2020, 4 (6), 1311. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.002
48. [48]
  (48) Takada, K.; Ohta, N.; Zhang, L.; Xu, X.; Hang, B. T.; Ohnishi, T.; Osada, M.; Sasaki, T. Solid State Ion. 2012, 225, 594. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2012.01.009
49. [49]
  (49) Haruyama, J.; Sodeyama, K.; Han, L.; Takada, K.; Tateyama, Y. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26 (14), 4248. doi:10.1021/cm5016959
50. [50]
  (50) Li, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Z.; Song, D.; Zhang, H.; Shi, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, L. J. Power Sources 2020, 456, 227997. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227997
51. [51]
52. [52]
53. [53]
  (53) Seino, Y.; Ota, T.; Takada, K. J. Power Sources 2011, 196 (15), 6488. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.090
54. [54]
  (54) Sakuda, A.; Kitaura, H.; Hayashi, A.; Tadanaga, K.; Tatsumisago, M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2009, 156 (1), A27. doi:10.1149/1.3005972
55. [55]
  (55) Takada, K.; Ohta, N.; Zhang, L.; Fukuda, K.; Sakaguchi, I.; Ma, R.; Osada, M.; Sasaki, T. Solid State Ion. 2008, 179 (27-32), 1333. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.017
56. [56]
  (56) Machida, N.; Kashiwagi, J.; Naito, M.; Shigematsu, T. Solid State Ion. 2012, 225, 354. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2011.11.026
57. [57]
  (57) Woo, J. H.; Trevey, J. E.; Cavanagh, A. S.; Choi, Y. S.; Kim, S. C.; George, S. M.; Oh, K. H.; Lee, S.-H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159 (7), A1120. doi:10.1149/2.085207jes
58. [58]
  (58) Wang, C.-W.; Ren, F.-C.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, P.-F.; Zhou, X.-D.; Zhang, S.-J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W.-D.; Zou, M.-H.; Zeng, L.-Y.; et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14 (1), 437. doi:10.1039/D0EE03212C
59. [59]
  (59) Xu, Z.-M.; Bo, S.-H.; Zhu, H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (43), 36941. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b12026
60. [60]
  (60) Nolan, A. M.; Liu, Y.; Mo, Y. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4 (10), 2444. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01703
61. [61]
  (61) Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Piper, L. F. J.; Whittingham, M. S.; Zhou, G. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122 (6), 5641. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00327
62. [62]
  (62) Haruta, M.; Shiraki, S.; Suzuki, T.; Kumatani, A.; Ohsawa, T.; Takagi, Y.; Shimizu, R.; Hitosugi, T. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (3), 1498. doi:10.1021/nl5035896
63. [63]
  (63) Hart, F. X.; Bates, J. B. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83 (12), 7560. doi:10.1063/1.367521
64. [64]
  (64) Lucovsky, G.; Liang, W. Y.; White, R. M.; Pisharody, K. R. Solid State Commun. 1976, 19 (4), 303. doi:10.1016/0038-1098(76)91337-5
65. [65]
  (65) Trevey, J. E.; Stoldt, C. R.; Lee, S.-H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158 (12), A1282. doi:10.1149/2.017112jes
66. [66]
  (66) Cai, L.; Zhang, Q.; Mwizerwa, J. P.; Wan, H.; Yang, X.; Xu, X.; Yao, X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (12), 10053. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b18798
67. [67]
  (67) Chen, F.; Kong, L.; Song, W.; Jiang, C.; Tian, S.; Yu, F.; Qin, L.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X. J. Materiomics 2019, 5 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2018.10.001
68. [68]
  (68) Yada, C.; Ohmori, A.; Ide, K.; Yamasaki, H.; Kato, T.; Saito, T.; Sagane, F.; Iriyama, Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (9), 1301416. doi:10.1002/aenm.201301416
69. [69]
  (69) Kim, S.; Fleig, J.; Maier, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5 (11), 2268. doi:10.1039/B300170A
70. [70]
  (70) Gregori, G.; Merkle, R.; Maier, J. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 89, 252. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.009
71. [71]
  (71) Yamamoto, K.; Iriyama, Y.; Asaka, T.; Hirayama, T.; Fujita, H.; Fisher, C. A. J.; Nonaka, K.; Sugita, Y.; Ogumi, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (26), 4414. doi:10.1002/anie.200907319
72. [72]
  (72) Masuda, H.; Ishida, N.; Ogata, Y.; Ito, D.; Fujita, D. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (2), 893. doi:10.1039/C6NR07971G
73. [73]
  (73) Tsuchiya, B.; Ohnishi, J.; Sasaki, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Motoyama, M.; Iriyama, Y.; Morita, K. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6 (14), 1900100. doi:10.1002/admi.201900100
74. [74]
  (74) Katzenmeier, L.; Carstensen, L.; Schaper, S. J.; Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Bandarenka, A. S. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33 (24), 2100585. doi:10.1002/adma.202100585
75. [75]
  (75) Katzenmeier, L.; Helmer, S.; Braxmeier, S.; Knobbe, E.; Bandarenka, A. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (4), 5853. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c21304
76. [76]
  (76) Katzenmeier, L.; Carstensen, L.; Bandarenka, A. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (13), 15811. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c00650
77. [77]
  (77) Swift, M. W.; Qi, Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122 (16), 167701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.167701
78. [78]
  (78) Liu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Jaegermann, W.; Hausbrand, R.; Xu, B.-X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (4), 5895. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c22986
79. [79]
  (79) Sinzig, S.; Hollweck, T.; Schmidt, C. P.; Wall, W. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2023, 170 (4), 040513. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/acc692
80. [80]
  (80) Katzenmeier, L.; Gößwein, M.; Gagliardi, A.; Bandarenka, A. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126 (26), 10900. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02481
81. [81]
  (81) Nomura, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Hirayama, T.; Ouchi, S.; Igaki, E.; Saitoh, K. Angew. Chem. 2019, 131 (16), 5346. doi:10.1002/ange.201814669
82. [82]
  (82) Zhang, J.; Zheng, C.; Li, L.; Xia, Y.; Huang, H.; Gan, Y.; Liang, C.; He, X.; Tao, X.; Zhang, W. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10 (4), 1903311. doi:10.1002/aenm.201903311
83. [83]
  (83) Lu, G.; Geng, F.; Gu, S.; Li, C.; Shen, M.; Hu, B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (22), 25556. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c05239
84. [84]
  (84) Fingerle, M.; Buchheit, R.; Sicolo, S.; Albe, K.; Hausbrand, R. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (18), 7675. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00890
85. [85]
  (85) Tian, H.-K.; Jalem, R.; Gao, B.; Yamamoto, Y.; Muto, S.; Sakakura, M.; Iriyama, Y.; Tateyama, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (49), 54752. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c16463
86. [86]
  (86) Wang, D.; Jiao, Y.; Shi, W.; Pu, B.; Ning, F.; Yi, J.; Ren, Y.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 133, 101055. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101055
87. [87]
  (87) Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22 (3), 587. doi:10.1021/cm901452z
88. [88]
  (88) Cherkashinin, G.; Hausbrand, R.; Jaegermann, W. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (3), A5308. doi:10.1149/2.0441903jes
89. [89]
  (89) Boettcher, S. W.; Oener, S. Z.; Lonergan, M. C.; Surendranath, Y.; Ardo, S.; Brozek, C.; Kempler, P. A. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6 (1), 261. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02443
90. [90]
  (90) Yu, P.; Li, C.; Guo, X. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118 (20), 10616. doi:10.1021/jp5010693
91. [91]
  (91) Usiskin, R.; Lu, Y.; Popovic, J.; Law, M.; Balaya, P.; Hu, Y.-S.; Maier, J. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6 (11), 1020. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00324-w
92. [92]
  (92) Li, X.; Su, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, L.; Ye, W.; Li, Q.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; et al. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67 (11), 1145. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2022.04.001
1. [1]
  Tao Jiang , Yuting Wang , Lüjin Gao , Yi Zou , Bowen Zhu , Li Chen , Xianzeng Li . Experimental Design for the Preparation of Composite Solid Electrolytes for Application in All-Solid-State Batteries: Exploration of Comprehensive Chemistry Laboratory Teaching. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(2): 371-378. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202308057
2. [2]
  Xinlong WANG , Zhenguo CHENG , Guo WANG , Xiaokuen ZHANG , Yong XIANG , Xinquan WANG . Enhancement of the fragile interface of high voltage LiCoO₂ by surface gradient permeation of trace amounts of Mg/F. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(3): 571-580. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230259
3. [3]
  Chunai Dai , Yongsheng Han , Luting Yan , Zhen Li , Yingze Cao . Ideological and Political Design of Solid-liquid Contact Angle Measurement Experiment. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(2): 28-33. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202306065
4. [4]
  Jiayu Tang , Jichuan Pang , Shaohua Xiao , Xinhua Xu , Meifen Wu . Improvement for Measuring Transference Numbers of Ions by Moving-Boundary Method. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(5): 193-200. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202311021
5. [5]
  Congying Lu , Fei Zhong , Zhenyu Yuan , Shuaibing Li , Jiayao Li , Jiewen Liu , Xianyang Hu , Liqun Sun , Rui Li , Meijuan Hu . Experimental Improvement of Surfactant Interface Chemistry: An Integrated Design for the Fusion of Experiment and Simulation. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 283-293. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202308097
6. [6]
  Xuan Zhou , Yi Fan , Zhuoqi Jiang , Zhipeng Li , Guowen Yuan , Laiying Zhang , Xu Hou . Liquid Gating Mechanism and Basic Properties Characterization: a New Experimental Design for Interface and Surface Properties in the Chemistry “101 Plan”. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(10): 113-120. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202407111
7. [7]
  Zeyuan WANG , Songzhi ZHENG , Hao LI , Jingbo WENG , Wei WANG , Yang WANG , Weihai SUN . Effect of I₂ interface modification engineering on the performance of all-inorganic CsPbBr₃ perovskite solar cells. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1290-1300. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240021
8. [8]
  Jizhou Liu , Chenbin Ai , Chenrui Hu , Bei Cheng , Jianjun Zhang . 六氯锡酸铵促进钙钛矿太阳能电池界面电子转移及其飞秒瞬态吸收光谱研究. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2402006-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202402006
9. [9]
  Yanhui Sun , Junmin Nan , Guozheng Ma , Xiaoxi Zuo , Guoliang Li , Xiaoming Lin . Exploration and Teaching Practice of Ideological and Political Elements in Interface Physical Chemistry: Taking “Additional Pressure on Curved Surfaces” as an Teaching Example. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(11): 20-27. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202402023
10. [10]
  Doudou Qin , Junyang Ding , Chu Liang , Qian Liu , Ligang Feng , Yang Luo , Guangzhi Hu , Jun Luo , Xijun Liu . Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Performance of Manganese-based Cathode Materials in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2310034-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202310034
11. [11]
  Jiaxing Cai , Wendi Xu , Haoqiang Chi , Qian Liu , Wa Gao , Li Shi , Jingxiang Low , Zhigang Zou , Yong Zhou . 具有0D/2D界面的InOOH/ZnIn₂S₄空心球S型异质结用于增强光催化CO₂转化性能. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2407002-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202407002
12. [12]
  Fang Niu , Rong Li , Qiaolan Zhang . Analysis of Gas-Solid Adsorption Behavior in Resistive Gas Sensing Process. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(8): 142-148. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202311102
13. [13]
  Qin ZHU , Jiao MA , Zhihui QIAN , Yuxu LUO , Yujiao GUO , Mingwu XIANG , Xiaofang LIU , Ping NING , Junming GUO . Morphological evolution and electrochemical properties of cathode material LiAl_0.08Mn_1.92O₄ single crystal particles. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(8): 1549-1562. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240022
14. [14]
  Qingtang ZHANG , Xiaoyu WU , Zheng WANG , Xiaomei WANG . Performance of nano Li₂FeSiO₄/C cathode material co-doped by potassium and chlorine ions. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1689-1696. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240115
15. [15]
  Siyu Zhang , Kunhong Gu , Bing'an Lu , Junwei Han , Jiang Zhou . Hydrometallurgical Processes on Recycling of Spent Lithium-lon Battery Cathode: Advances and Applications in Sustainable Technologies. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2309028-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309028
16. [16]
  Xinpeng LIU , Liuyang ZHAO , Hongyi LI , Yatu CHEN , Aimin WU , Aikui LI , Hao HUANG . Ga₂O₃ coated modification and electrochemical performance of Li_1.2Mn_0.54Ni_0.13Co_0.13O₂ cathode material. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(6): 1105-1113. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230488
17. [17]
  Junke LIU , Kungui ZHENG , Wenjing SUN , Gaoyang BAI , Guodong BAI , Zuwei YIN , Yao ZHOU , Juntao LI . Preparation of modified high-nickel layered cathode with LiAlO₂/cyclopolyacrylonitrile dual-functional coating. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(8): 1461-1473. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240189
18. [18]
  Jianbao Mei , Bei Li , Shu Zhang , Dongdong Xiao , Pu Hu , Geng Zhang . Enhanced Performance of Ternary NASICON-Type Na_3.5-xMn_0.5V_1.5-xZr_x(PO₄)₃/C Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(12): 2407023-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202407023
19. [19]
  Zhenming Xu , Mingbo Zheng , Zhenhui Liu , Duo Chen , Qingsheng Liu . Experimental Design of Project-Driven Teaching in Computational Materials Science: First-Principles Calculations of the LiFePO₄ Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(4): 140-148. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202307022
20. [20]
  Haihua Yang , Minjie Zhou , Binhong He , Wenyuan Xu , Bing Chen , Enxiang Liang . Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Performance of Iron Phosphide@Carbon Nanotubes as Cathode Material for Zinc-Air Battery: a Comprehensive Undergraduate Chemical Experiment. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(10): 426-432. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202405100

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(2)
Abstract views(94)
HTML views(0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142