Citation: Tao Xu,  Wei Sun,  Tianci Kong,  Jie Zhou,  Yitai Qian. Stable Graphite Interface for Potassium Ion Battery Achieving Ultralong Cycling Performance[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, ;2024, 40(2): 230302. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202303021 shu

Stable Graphite Interface for Potassium Ion Battery Achieving Ultralong Cycling Performance

  • Corresponding author: Jie Zhou,  Yitai Qian, 
  • Received Date: 8 March 2023
    Revised Date: 14 April 2023
    Accepted Date: 20 April 2023

    Fund Project: The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22201275, 21975244, 21831006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2060000036), and the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2208085QB32).

  • Graphite has been extensively employed as commercial anode material in Li-ion batteries due to its high abundance, low cost, and negative electrode potential. Furthermore, it has demonstrated significant potential for use in K-ion batteries. However, distinct structural damage caused by the larger radius of K-ion (0.138 nm) compared to that of Li-ion (0.076 nm) leads to obvious capacity decay and unstable cycle life. It is crucial to improve the cycling stability of graphite in potassium ion batteries (PIBs). Herein, we design a stable interface of graphite anode by graphene coating with a simple and efficient microwave method. According to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), microwave reduction can effectively remove the oxygen group of graphene oxide (GO) within 10 s. The graphene coating can buffer the volume expansion of the graphite to suppress structural collapse; it can also accelerate electronic transmission to improve rate performance. As a result, the graphene-coating graphite anode, named GCG, exhibits super cycling stability with a capacity of 262 mAh∙g-1after 3000 cycles at a current density of 0.2 A∙g-1, which means it can operate smoothly for one year. In contrast, at the same current density, graphite exhibits capacity fading to less than 150 mAh∙g-1 after 150 cycles. Moreover, compared to graphite, GCG demonstrates better rate performance achieving a capacity of 161.2 mAh∙g-1 at 500 mA∙g-1. Further electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) tests show that GCG exhibits faster electrical conductivity and ion diffusion compared to graphite. Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images after cycling verify that the graphene buffer interface benefits the integrity of the electrode structure and improves the stability of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Compared to graphite, the GCG anode exhibits better performance, as follows: 1) The graphene coating inhibits exfoliation of graphite during cycling, solving the problem of graphite anode’ short cycling life, and 2) the graphene protective layer improves the ion diffusion rate, resulting in better rate performance of the GCG. In addition, this approach offers the advantages of simple operation and low cost, hopefully enabling large-scale applications of potassium-ion batteries.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      (1) Goodenough, J. B. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1 (3), 204. doi: 10.1038/s41928-018-0048-6

    2. [2]

      (2) Tarascon, J.-M. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2 (6), 510. doi: 10.1038/nchem.680

    3. [3]

      (3) Larcher, D.; Tarascon, J. M. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7 (1), 19. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2085

    4. [4]

      (4) Eftekhari, A.; Jian, Z.; Ji, X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (5), 4404. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b07989

    5. [5]

      (5) Wu, X.; Leonard, D. P.; Ji, X. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (12), 5031. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01764

    6. [6]

      (6) Pramudita, J. C.; Sehrawat, D.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sharma, N. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7 (24), 1602911. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602911

    7. [7]

      (7) Zhao, J.; Zou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26 (44), 8103. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201602248

    8. [8]

      (8) Komaba, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Dahbi, M.; Kubota, K. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 60, 172. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.09.002

    9. [9]

      (9) Kim, H.; Hyun, J. C.; Jung, J. I.; Lee, J. B.; Choi, J.; Cho, S. Y.; Jin, H.-J.; Yun, Y. S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10 (4), 2055. doi: 10.1039/d1ta08981a

    10. [10]

      (10) Jian, Z.; Xing, Z.; Bommier, C.; Li, Z.; Ji, X. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (3), 1501874. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201501874

    11. [11]

      (11) Jian, Z.; Luo, W.; Ji, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (36), 11566. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06809

    12. [12]

      (12) Zhang, R.; Huang, J.; Deng, W.; Bao, J.; Pan, Y.; Huang, S.; Sun, C.-F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (46), 16474. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909202

    13. [13]

      (13) Yoo, E.; Kim, J.; Hosono, E.; Zhou, H.-S.; Kudo, T.; Honma, I. Nano Lett. 2008, 8 (8), 2277. doi: 10.1021/nl800957b

    14. [14]

      (14) Liang, K.; Li, M.; Hao, Y.; Yan, W.; Cao, M.; Fan, S.; Han, W.; Su, J. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124956. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124956

    15. [15]

      (15) Liu, C.; Fang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.; Yang, G.; Peng, L.; Guo, X.; Ding, W.; Hou, W. Nano Res. 2022, 16 (2), 2463. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4994-y

    16. [16]

    17. [17]

      (17) Liu, W.; Li, H.; Jin, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Paek, E.; Mitlin, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (46), 16590. doi: 10.1002/anie.201906612

    18. [18]

      (18) Voiry, D.; Yang, J.; Kupferberg, J.; Fullon, R.; Lee, C.; Jeong, H. Y.; Shin, H. S.; Chhowalla, M. Science 2016, 353 (6306), 1413. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3398

    19. [19]

      (19) Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Cen, W.; Ren, W.; Guo, H.; Vvu, S.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, S.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, D.; et al. Nano Res. 2022, 15 (5), 4083. doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-4023-6

    20. [20]

      (20) Baddour-Hadjean, R.; Pereira-Ramos, J.-P. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110 (3), 1278. doi: 10.1021/cr800344k

    21. [21]

      (21) Zheng, J. M.; Engelhard, M. H.; Mei, D. H.; Jiao, S. H.; Polzin, B. J.; Zhang, J. G.; Xu, W. Nat. Energy 2017, 2 (3), 17012. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.12

    22. [22]

      (22) Jiao, S.; Ren, X.; Cao, R.; Engelhard, M. H.; Liu, Y.; Hu, D.; Mei, D.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, W.; Li, Q.; et al. Nat. Energy. 2018, 3 (9), 739. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0199-8

    23. [23]

      (23) Lou, S.; Cheng, X.; Wang, L.; Gao, J.; Li, Q.; Ma, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zuo, P.; Du, C.; Yin, G. J. Power Sources 2017, 361, 80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.023

    24. [24]

      (24) Kim, H.; Hong, J.; Park, Y.-U.; Kim, J.; Hwang, I.; Kang, K. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25 (4), 534. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402984

    25. [25]

      (25) Augustyn, V.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (5), 1597. doi: 10.1039/c3ee44164d

    26. [26]

      (26) Qin, L.; Xiao, N.; Zheng, J.; Lei, Y.; Zhai, D.; Wu, Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9 (44), 1902618. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902618

    27. [27]

      (27) Lin, X.; Dong, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Xing, T.; Li, A.; Song, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (10), 6423. doi: 10.1039/d1ta00178g

    28. [28]

      (28) Shaju, K. M.; Rao, G. V. S.; Chowdari, B. V. R. J. Electrochem Soc. 2004, 151 (9), A1324. doi: 10.1149/1.1775218

    29. [29]

      (29) Funabiki, A.; Inaba, M.; Ogumi, Z.; Yuasa, S.; Otsuji, J.; Tasaka, A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145 (1), 172. doi: 10.1149/1.1838231

    30. [30]

      (30) Meng, C.; Yuan, M.; Cao, B.; Lin, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, A.; Chen, X.; Jia, M.; Song, H. Carbon 2022, 192, 347. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.039

    31. [31]

      (31) Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tao, Y.; Yang, Q.-H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12 (35), 2201574. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202201574

    32. [32]

      (32) Fan, L.; Ma, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, X.; Lu, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (31), 10500. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904258

  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Zhihuan XUQing KANGYuzhen LONGQian YUANCidong LIUXin LIGenghuai TANGYuqing LIAO . Effect of graphene oxide concentration on the electrochemical properties of reduced graphene oxide/ZnS. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1329-1336. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230447

    2. [2]

      Jie XIEHongnan XUJianfeng LIAORuoyu CHENLin SUNZhong JIN . Nitrogen-doped 3D graphene-carbon nanotube network for efficient lithium storage. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(10): 1840-1849. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240216

    3. [3]

      Yunting Shang Yue Dai Jianxin Zhang Nan Zhu Yan Su . Something about RGO (Reduced Graphene Oxide). University Chemistry, 2024, 39(9): 273-278. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202306050

    4. [4]

      Zhuo WANGJunshan ZHANGShaoyan YANGLingyan ZHOUYedi LIYuanpei LAN . Preparation and photocatalytic performance of CeO2-reduced graphene oxide by thermal decomposition. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1708-1718. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240067

    5. [5]

      Jiayu Tang Jichuan Pang Shaohua Xiao Xinhua Xu Meifen Wu . Improvement for Measuring Transference Numbers of Ions by Moving-Boundary Method. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(5): 193-200. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202311021

    6. [6]

      Zhenlin Zhou Siyuan Chen Yi Liu Chengguo Hu Faqiong Zhao . A New Program of Voltammetry Experiment Teaching Based on Laser-Scribed Graphene Electrode. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(2): 358-370. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202308049

    7. [7]

      Zeyuan WANGSongzhi ZHENGHao LIJingbo WENGWei WANGYang WANGWeihai SUN . Effect of I2 interface modification engineering on the performance of all-inorganic CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1290-1300. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240021

    8. [8]

      Jizhou Liu Chenbin Ai Chenrui Hu Bei Cheng Jianjun Zhang . 六氯锡酸铵促进钙钛矿太阳能电池界面电子转移及其飞秒瞬态吸收光谱研究. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2402006-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202402006

    9. [9]

      Zeyu XUAnlei DANGBihua DENGXiaoxin ZUOYu LUPing YANGWenzhu YIN . Evaluation of the efficacy of graphene oxide quantum dots as an ovalbumin delivery platform and adjuvant for immune enhancement. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(6): 1065-1078. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240099

    10. [10]

      Hao BAIWeizhi JIJinyan CHENHongji LIMingji LI . Preparation of Cu2O/Cu-vertical graphene microelectrode and detection of uric acid/electroencephalogram. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1309-1319. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240001

    11. [11]

      Yan LIUJiaxin GUOSong YANGShixian XUYanyan YANGZhongliang YUXiaogang HAO . Exclusionary recovery of phosphate anions with low concentration from wastewater using a CoNi-layered double hydroxide/graphene electronically controlled separation film. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1775-1783. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240043

    12. [12]

      Xiaoning TANGJunnan LIUXingfu YANGJie LEIQiuyang LUOShu XIAAn XUE . Effect of sodium alginate-sodium carboxymethylcellulose gel layer on the stability of Zn anodes. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(8): 1452-1460. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240191

    13. [13]

      Qingtang ZHANGXiaoyu WUZheng WANGXiaomei WANG . Performance of nano Li2FeSiO4/C cathode material co-doped by potassium and chlorine ions. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1689-1696. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240115

    14. [14]

      Qiuyang LUOXiaoning TANGShu XIAJunnan LIUXingfu YANGJie LEI . Application of a densely hydrophobic copper metal layer in-situ prepared with organic solvents for protecting zinc anodes. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1243-1253. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240110

    15. [15]

      Doudou Qin Junyang Ding Chu Liang Qian Liu Ligang Feng Yang Luo Guangzhi Hu Jun Luo Xijun Liu . Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Performance of Manganese-based Cathode Materials in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2310034-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202310034

    16. [16]

      Yifeng Xu Jiquan Liu Bin Cui Yan Li Gang Xie Ying Yang . “Xiao Li’s School Adventures: The Working Principles and Safety Risks of Lithium-ion Batteries”. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(9): 259-265. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202404009

    17. [17]

      Xinlong WANGZhenguo CHENGGuo WANGXiaokuen ZHANGYong XIANGXinquan WANG . Enhancement of the fragile interface of high voltage LiCoO2 by surface gradient permeation of trace amounts of Mg/F. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(3): 571-580. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230259

    18. [18]

      Chunai Dai Yongsheng Han Luting Yan Zhen Li Yingze Cao . Ideological and Political Design of Solid-liquid Contact Angle Measurement Experiment. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(2): 28-33. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202306065

    19. [19]

      Xiaoning TANGShu XIAJie LEIXingfu YANGQiuyang LUOJunnan LIUAn XUE . Fluorine-doped MnO2 with oxygen vacancy for stabilizing Zn-ion batteries. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(9): 1671-1678. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240149

    20. [20]

      Siyu Zhang Kunhong Gu Bing'an Lu Junwei Han Jiang Zhou . Hydrometallurgical Processes on Recycling of Spent Lithium-lon Battery Cathode: Advances and Applications in Sustainable Technologies. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(10): 2309028-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309028

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(108)
  • HTML views(9)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Address:Zhongguancun North First Street 2,100190 Beijing, PR China Tel: +86-010-82449177-888
Powered By info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return