Citation: HOU Quan, GUAN Chengzhi, XIAO Guoping, WANG Jian-Qiang, ZHU Zhiyuan. Effect of Oxygen Partial Pressure on Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, ;2019, 35(3): 284-291. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804171 shu

Effect of Oxygen Partial Pressure on Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells

HOU Quan ^1,3 ,
GUAN Chengzhi ^1,2,3 ,
XIAO Guoping ^1,2 ,
WANG Jian-Qiang ^1,2,, ,
ZHU Zhiyuan ^1,2

1.
Department of Molten Salt Chemistry and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, P. R. China
2.
Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, P. R. China
3.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. China

Corresponding author: WANG Jian-Qiang, wangjianqiang@sinap.ac.cn
Received Date: 21 March 2018
Revised Date: 9 April 2018
Accepted Date: 9 April 2018
Available Online: 17 March 2018
Fund Project: The project was supported by the "Strategic Priority Research Program" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA02040600)the "Strategic Priority Research Program" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA02040600

High-temperature (700–900 ℃) steam electrolysis based on solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) is valuable as an efficient and clean path for large-scale hydrogen production with nearly zero carbon emissions, compared with the traditional paths of steam methane reforming or coal gasification. The operation parameters, in particular the feeding gas composition and pressure, significantly affect the performance of the electrolysis cell. In this study, a computational fluid dynamics model of an SOEC is built to predict the electrochemical performance of the cell with different sweep gases on the oxygen electrode. Sweep gases with different oxygen partial pressures between 1.01 × 10³ and 1.0 × 10⁵ Pa are fed to the oxygen electrode of the cell, and the influence of the oxygen partial pressure on the chemical equilibrium and kinetic reactions of the SOECs is analyzed. It is shown that the rate of increase of the reversible potential is inversely proportional to the oxygen partial pressure. Regarding the overpotentials caused by the ohmic, activation, and concentration polarization, the results vary with the reversible potential. The Ohmic overpotential is constant under different operating conditions. The activation and concentration overpotentials at the hydrogen electrode are also steady over the entire oxygen partial pressure range. The oxygen partial pressure has the largest effect on the activation and concentration overpotentials on the oxygen electrode side, both of which decrease sharply with increasing oxygen partial pressure. Owing to the combined effects of the reversible potential and polarization overpotentials, the total electrolysis voltage is nonlinear. At low current density, the electrolysis cell shows better performance at low oxygen partial pressure, whereas the performance improves with increasing oxygen partial pressure at high current density. Thus, at low current density, the best sweep gas should be an oxygen-deficient gas such as nitrogen, CO₂, or steam. Steam is the most promising because it is easy to separate the steam from the by-product oxygen in the tail gas, provided that the oxygen electrode is humidity-tolerant. However, at high current density, it is best to use pure oxygen as the sweep gas to reduce the electric energy consumption in the steam electrolysis process. The effects of the oxygen partial pressure on the power density and coefficient of performance of the SOEC are also discussed. At low current density, the electrical power demand is constant, and the efficiency decreases with growing oxygen partial pressure, whereas at high current density, the electrical power demand drops, and the efficiency increases.
- Solid oxide electrolysis cell,
- Interface,
- Oxygen partial pressure,
- Theoretical model,
- Computational fluid dynamics
1. [1]
  Ni, M.; Leung, M. K.; Leung, D. Y. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33 (9), 2337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.048 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.048
2. [2]
  Wachsman, E. D.; Lee, K. T. Science 2011, 334 (6058), 935. doi: 10.1126/science.1204090 doi: 10.1126/science.1204090
3. [3]
  Wang, S. Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2004, 20 (1), 43. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20040109
4. [4]
  Stempien, J. P.; Sun, Q.; Chan, S. H. J. Power. Technol. 2013, 93 (4), 216. doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962406 doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962406
5. [5]
  Yu, B.; Liu, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, P.; Xu, J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (2), 395. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110214
6. [6]
  Yu, L.; Yu, F. Y.; Yuan, L. L.; Cai, W. Z.; Liu, J.; Yang, C. H.; Liu, M. L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32 (2), 503. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201512032
7. [7]
  Wang, Z.; Mori, M.; Araki, T. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 4451. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.058 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.058
8. [8]
  O'Brien, J. E.; Stoots, C. M.; Herring, J. S.; Hartvigsen, J. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2006, 3, 213. doi: 10.1115/1.2179435 doi: 10.1115/1.2179435
9. [9]
  Navasa, M.; Yuan, J.; Sundén, B. Appl. Energy 2015, 137 (137), 867. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.104 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.104
10. [10]
  Laguna-Bercero, M. A. J. Power Sources 2012, 203, 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.019
11. [11]
  Holladay, J. D.; Hu, J.; King, D. L.; Wang, Y. Catal. Today 2009, 139, 244. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039 doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039
12. [12]
  Gomez, S. Y.; Hotza, D. Renew Sust. Energ. Rev. 2016, 155. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.005
13. [13]
  Udagawa, J.; Aguiar, P.; Brandon, N. P. J. Power Sources 2007, 166 (1), 127. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.081 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.081
14. [14]
  Lindstrom, P. J.; Mallard, W. G. NIST Chemistry Webbook; NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, retrieved 2010-03-26.
15. [15]
  Udagawa, J.; Aguiar, P.; Brandon, N. P. J. Power Sources 2008, 180 (1), 354. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.069 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.069
16. [16]
  Hjalmarsson, P.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M. J. Power Sources 2013, 349. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.063 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.063
17. [17]
  Lagunabercero, M. A.; Campana, R.; Larrea, A.; Kilner, J. A.; Orera, V. M. J. Power Sources 2011, 196 (21), 8942. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.015
18. [18]
  Kim, J.; Ji, H. I.; Dasari, H. P.; Shin, D.; Song, H.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, B. K.; Je, H. J.; Lee, H. W.; Yoon, K. J. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38 (3), 1225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.113 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.113
19. [19]
  Kamata, H.; Hosaka, A.; Mizusaki, J.; Tagawa, H. Solid State Ionics 1998, 106, 237. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00495-5 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00495-5
20. [20]
  Mocoteguy, P.; Brisse, A. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38 (36), 15887. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045
21. [21]
  Yang, C.; Coffin, A.; Chen, F. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35 (8), 3221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.056 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.056
22. [22]
  Virkar, A. V. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35 (18), 9527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.058 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.058
23. [23]
  Cacciuttolo, Q.; Vulliet, J.; Lair, V.; Cassir, M.; Ringuedé, A. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40 (35), 11378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.034 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.034
24. [24]
  Li, S. L.; Tu, H. Y.; Yu, L. J. J. Inorg. Mater. 2017, 32 (5), 469. doi: 10.15541/jim20160444 doi: 10.15541/jim20160444
25. [25]
  Liu, T.; Wang, C.; Hao, S.; Fu, Z.; Peppley, B. A.; Mao, Z.; Wang, J.; Mao, Z. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41 (36), 15970. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.243 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.243
26. [26]
  Salzano, F. J.; Skaperdas, G.; Mezzina, A. Int J Hydrog. Energy 1985, 10 (11), 801. doi: 10.1016/0360-3199(85)90168-5 doi: 10.1016/0360-3199(85)90168-5
27. [27]
  Ni, M.; Leung, M. K. H.; Leung, D. Y. C. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2007, 32 (13), 2305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.001
28. [28]
  Buttler, A.; Koltun, R.; Wolf, R.; Spliethoff, H. Int J Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40 (1), 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.048 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.048
29. [29]
  Bockris, J.; Reddy, A. Modern Electrochemistry; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 1977.
30. [30]
  Hernandez-Pacheco, E.; Singh, D.; Hutton, P. N.; Patel, N.; Mann, M. D. J. Power Sources 2004, 138 (1–2), 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.051 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.051
31. [31]
  Laurencin, J.; Kane, D.; Delette, G. J. Power Sources 2011, 196 (4), 2080. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.054 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.054
32. [32]
  Costamagna, P.; Honegger, K. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145 (11), 3995. doi: 10.1149/1.1838904 doi: 10.1149/1.1838904
33. [33]
  Ni, M.; Leung, M. K. H.; Leung, D. Y. C. J. Power Sources 2006, 163 (1), 460. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.024
34. [34]
  Ni, M.; Leung, M. K. H.; Leung, D. Y. C. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52 (24), 6707. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.084 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.084
35. [35]
  Zhu, H.; Kee, R. J. J. Power Sources 2007, 169 (2), 315. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.047 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.047
36. [36]
  Henke, M.; Willich, C.; Kallo, J.; Friedrich, K. A. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39 (24), 12434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.185 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.185
37. [37]
  Fuller, E. N.; Ensley, K.; Giddings, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 78, 3679. doi: 10.1021/j100845a020 doi: 10.1021/j100845a020
38. [38]
  Fuller, E. N.; Schettler, P. D.; Giddings, J. C. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1966, 58, 18. doi: 10.1021/ie50677a007 doi: 10.1021/ie50677a007
39. [39]
  Henke, M.; Kallo, J.; Friedrich, K. A.; Bessler, W. G. Fuel Cells 2011, 11, 581. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201000098 doi: 10.1002/fuce.201000098
1. [1]
  Lili Zhang , Hui Gao , Gong Zhang , Yuning Dong , Kai Huang , Zifan Pang , Tuo Wang , Chunlei Pei , Peng Zhang , Jinlong Gong . Cross-section design of the flow channels in membrane electrode assembly electrolyzer for CO₂ reduction reaction through numerical simulations. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 110204-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110204
2. [2]
  Shiyu Hou , Maolin Sun , Liming Cao , Chaoming Liang , Jiaxin Yang , Xinggui Zhou , Jinxing Ye , Ruihua Cheng . Computational fluid dynamics simulation and experimental study on mixing performance of a three-dimensional circular cyclone-type microreactor. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108761-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108761
3. [3]
  Caixia Li , Yi Qiu , Yufeng Zhao , Wuliang Feng . Self assembled electron blocking and lithiophilic interface towards dendrite-free solid-state lithium battery. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108846-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108846
4. [4]
  Han Yan , Jingming Yao , Zhangran Ye , Qiaoquan Lin , Ziqi Zhang , Shulin Li , Dawei Song , Zhenyu Wang , Chuang Yu , Long Zhang . Al-F co-doping towards enhanced electrolyte-electrodes interface properties for halide and sulfide solid electrolytes. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 109568-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109568
5. [5]
  Chaozheng He , Jia Wang , Ling Fu , Wei Wei . Nitric oxide assists nitrogen reduction reaction on 2D MBene: A theoretical study. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 109037-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109037
6. [6]
  Yaping Wang , Pengcheng Yuan , Zeyuan Xu , Xiong-Xiong Liu , Shengfa Feng , Mufan Cao , Chen Cao , Xiaoqiang Wang , Long Pan , Zheng-Ming Sun . Ti₃C₂T_x MXene in-situ transformed Li₂TiO₃ interface layer enabling 4.5 V-LiCoO₂/sulfide all-solid-state lithium batteries with superior rate capability and cyclability. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 108776-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108776
7. [7]
  Ze Liu , Xiaochen Zhang , Jinlong Luo , Yingjian Yu . Application of metal-organic frameworks to the anode interface in metal batteries. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 109500-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109500
8. [8]
  Lili Wang , Ya Yan , Rulin Li , Xujie Han , Jiahui Li , Ting Ran , Jialu Li , Baichuan Xiong , Xiaorong Song , Zhaohui Yin , Hong Wang , Qingjun Zhu , Bowen Cheng , Zhen Yin . Interface engineering of 2D NiFe LDH/NiFeS heterostructure for highly efficient 5-hydroxymethylfurfural electrooxidation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 110011-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110011
9. [9]
  Changyuan Bao , Yunpeng Jiang , Haoyin Zhong , Huaizheng Ren , Junhui Wang , Binbin Liu , Qi Zhao , Fan Jin , Yan Meng Chong , Jianguo Sun , Fei Wang , Bo Wang , Ximeng Liu , Dianlong Wang , John Wang . Synergizing 3D-printed structure and sodiophilic interface enables highly efficient sodium metal anodes. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 109353-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109353
10. [10]
  Linlu Bai , Wensen Li , Xiaoyu Chu , Haochun Yin , Yang Qu , Ekaterina Kozlova , Zhao-Di Yang , Liqiang Jing . Effects of nanosized Au on the interface of zinc phthalocyanine/TiO₂ for CO₂ photoreduction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109931-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109931
11. [11]
  Manyu Zhu , Fei Liang , Lie Wu , Zihao Li , Chen Wang , Shule Liu , Xiue Jiang . Revealing the difference of Stark tuning rate between interface and bulk by surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109962-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109962
12. [12]
  Yuchen Wang , Zhenhao Xu , Kai Yan . Rational design of metal-metal hydroxide interface for efficient electrocatalytic oxidation of biomass-derived platform molecules. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2025, 44(1): 100418-100418. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100418
13. [13]
  Jinyuan Cui , Tingting Yang , Teng Xu , Jin Lin , Kunlong Liu , Pengxin Liu . Hydrogen spillover enhances the selective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes on the Cu-O-Ce interface. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2025, 44(1): 100438-100438. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100438
14. [14]
  Lingjun Sha , Bing Bo , Jiayu Li , Qi Liu , Ya Cao , Jing Zhao . Precise assessment of lung cancer-derived exosomes based on dual-labelled membrane interface. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 110109-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110109
15. [15]
  Yang LIU , Lijun WANG , Hongyu WANG , Zhidong CHEN , Lin SUN . Surface and interface modification of porous silicon anodes in lithium-ion batteries by the introduction of heterogeneous atoms and hybrid encapsulation. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(4): 773-785. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20250015
16. [16]
  Bingwei Wang , Yihong Ding , Xiao Tian . Benchmarking model chemistry composite calculations for vertical ionization potential of molecular systems. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109721-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109721
17. [17]
  Chen Chen , Jinzhou Zheng , Chaoqin Chu , Qinkun Xiao , Chaozheng He , Xi Fu . An effective method for generating crystal structures based on the variational autoencoder and the diffusion model. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 109739-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109739
18. [18]
  Jincheng Zhang , Mengjie Sun , Jiali Ren , Rui Zhang , Min Ma , Qingzhong Xue , Jian Tian . Oxygen vacancies-rich molybdenum tungsten oxide nanowires as a highly active nitrogen fixation electrocatalyst. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 110491-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110491
19. [19]
  Tian TIAN , Meng ZHOU , Jiale WEI , Yize LIU , Yifan MO , Yuhan YE , Wenzhi JIA , Bin HE . Ru-doped Co₃O₄/reduced graphene oxide: Preparation and electrocatalytic oxygen evolution property. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(2): 385-394. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240298
20. [20]
  Zhen Shi , Wei Jin , Yuhang Sun , Xu Li , Liang Mao , Xiaoyan Cai , Zaizhu Lou . Interface charge separation in Cu2CoSnS4/ZnIn2S4 heterojunction for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(12): 100201-100201. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100201

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(8)
Abstract views(306)
HTML views(50)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142