Citation: GONZÁLEZ Marco Martínez, CÁRDENAS Carlos, RODRÍGUEZ Juan I., LIU Shubin, HEIDAR-ZADEH Farnaz, MIRANDA-QUINTANA Ramón Alain, AYERS Paul W.. Quantitative Electrophilicity Measures[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, ;2018, 34(6): 662-674. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201711021 shu

Quantitative Electrophilicity Measures

1.
Laboratory of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Havana, Havana 10400, Cuba
2.
Departamento de Química, and Centro de Química Universidade de Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
3.
Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla, 653 Santiago, Chile
4.
Centro para el desarrollo de la Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, CEDENNA, Av. Ecuador 3493, Santiago, Chile
5.
Escuela Superior de Física y Matemáticas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Edificio 9, U.P. A.L.M., Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, C.P. 07738, Ciudad de México, México
6.
Research Computing Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3420, USA
7.
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology; McMaster University; Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada
8.
Department of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S3), 9000 Gent, Belgium
9.
Center for Molecular Modeling, Ghent University, Technologiepark 903, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium

Corresponding author: MIRANDA-QUINTANA Ramón Alain, ramirandaq@gmail.com AYERS Paul W., ayers@mcmaster.ca
Received Date: 13 September 2017
Revised Date: 13 October 2017
Accepted Date: 30 October 2017
Available Online: 2 June 2017
Fund Project: CC acknowledges support by FONDECYT (1140313), Financiamiento Basal para Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de Excelencia-FB0807, and project RC-130006 CILIS; Chile. PWA acknowledges support from NSERC, the Canada Research Chairs, and Compute Canada; Canada

Quantitative correlation of several theoretical electrophilicity measures over different families of organic compounds are examined relative to the experimental values of Mayr et al. Notably, the ability to predict these values accurately will help to elucidate the reactivity and selectivity trends observed in charge-transfer reactions. A crucial advantage of this theoretical approach is that it provides this information without the need of experiments, which are often demanding and time-consuming. Here, two different types of electrophilicity measures were analyzed. First, models derived from conceptual density functional theory (c-DFT), including Parr's original proposal and further generalizations of this index, are investigated. For instance, the approaches of Gázquez et al. and Chamorro et al. are considered, whereby it is possible to distinguish between processes in which a molecule gains or loses electrons. Further, we also explored two novel electrophilicity definitions. On one hand, the potential of environmental perturbations to affect electron incorporation into a system is analyzed in terms of recent developments in c-DFT. These studies highlight the importance of considering the molecular surroundings when a consistent description of chemical reactivity is needed. On the other hand, we test a new definition of electrophilicity that is free from inconsistencies (so-called thermodynamic electrophilicity). This approach is based on Parr's pioneering insights, though it corrects issues present in the standard working expression for the calculation of electrophilicity. Additionally, we use machine-learning tools (i.e., symbolic regression) to identify the models that best fit the experimental values. In this way, the best possible description of the electrophilicity values in terms of different electronic structure quantities is obtained. Overall, this straightforward approach enables one to obtain good correlations between the theoretical and experimental quantities by using the simple, yet powerful, interpretative advantage of c-DFT methods. In general, we observed that the correlations found at the HF/6-31G(d) level of theory are of semi-quantitative value. To obtain more accurate results, we showed that working with families of compounds with similar functional groups is indispensable.
- Electrophilicity,
- Conceptual density functional theory,
- Symbolic regression,
- Genetic programming,
- Grammatical evolution
1. [1]
  Miller, B. Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions and Mechanisms; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998.doi: 10.1021/ed075p1558 doi: 10.1021/ed075p1558
2. [2]
  March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1992. doi: 10.1002/0470084960 doi: 10.1002/0470084960
3. [3]
  Mayr, H.; Kempf, B.; Ofial, A. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 66.doi: 10.1021/ar020094c doi: 10.1021/ar020094c
4. [4]
  Mayr, H.; Bug, T.; Gotta, M. F.; Hering, N.; Irrgang, B.; Janker, B.; Kempf, B.; Loos, R.; Ofial, A. R.; Remennikov, G.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9500. doi: 10.1021/ja010890y doi: 10.1021/ja010890y
5. [5]
  Mayr, H.; Patz, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 938.doi: 10.1002/anie.199409381 doi: 10.1002/anie.199409381
6. [6]
  Mayr, H.; Ofial, A. R. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 584.doi: 10.1002/poc.1325 doi: 10.1002/poc.1325
7. [7]
  Mayr, H.; Ofial, A. R. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1807.doi: 10.1351/pac200577111807 doi: 10.1351/pac200577111807
8. [8]
  Liu, S. B. In Chemical Reactivity Theory: A Density Functional View; Chattaraj, P. K., Ed.; Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; p. 179.
9. [9]
  Chattaraj, P. K.; Giri, S. Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. C 2009, 105, 13.doi: 10.1039/B802832J doi: 10.1039/B802832J
10. [10]
  Chattaraj, P. K.; Giri, S.; Duley, S. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, PR43.doi: 10.1021/cr100149p doi: 10.1021/cr100149p
11. [11]
  Maynard, A. T.; Huang, M.; Rice, W. G.; Covell, D. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11578 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11578
12. [12]
  Parr, R. G.; von Szentpály, L.; Liu, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922. doi: 10.1021/ja983494x doi: 10.1021/ja983494x
13. [13]
  Chermette, H. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 129.doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990115)20:1 < 129::AID-JCC13 > 3.0.CO; 2-A doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990115)20:1<129::AID-JCC13>3.0.CO;2-A
14. [14]
  Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford UP: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
15. [15]
  Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Langenaeker, W. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1793. doi: 10.1021/cr990029 doi: 10.1021/cr990029
16. [16]
  Johnson, P. A.; Bartolotti, L. J.; Ayers, P. W.; Fievez, T.; Geerlings, P. Modern Charge Density Analysis; Gatti, C., Macchi, P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; p. 715.
17. [17]
  Ayers, P. W.; Anderson, J. S. M.; Bartolotti, L. J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2005, 101, 520. doi: 10.1002/qua.20307 doi: 10.1002/qua.20307
18. [18]
  Ayers, P. W.; Parr, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2010.doi: 10.1021/ja9924039 doi: 10.1021/ja9924039
19. [19]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Conceptual Density Functional Theory and its Applications in the Chemical Domain; Islam, N., Kaya, S., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: NJ, USA, in press.
20. [20]
  Chemical Reactivity Theory: A Density Functional View; Chattaraj, P. K., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009.
21. [21]
  Fuentealba, P.; Cárdenas, C. Chemical Modelling; Springborg, M., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2015; Vol. 11, p. 151.
22. [22]
  Liu, S. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 590. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20090332 doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20090332
23. [23]
  Gazquez, J. L. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2008, 52, 3.
24. [24]
  Domingo, L. R.; Perez, P.; Saez, J. A. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1486.doi: 10.1039/C2RA22886F doi: 10.1039/C2RA22886F
25. [25]
  Domingo, L. R.; Zaragoza, R. J.; Saez, J. A.; Arno, M. Molecules 2012, 17, 1335. doi: 10.3390/molecules17021335 doi: 10.3390/molecules17021335
26. [26]
  Domingo, L. R.; Perez, P.; Contreras, R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6585. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.06.003
27. [27]
  Domingo, L. R.; Aurell, M. J.; Perez, P.; Contreras, R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6871. doi: 10.1021/jp020715j doi: 10.1021/jp020715j
28. [28]
  Anderson, J. S. M.; Liu, Y. L.; Thomson, J. W.; Ayers, P. W. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 2010, 943, 168.doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.12.013
29. [29]
  Ayers, P. W.; Anderson, J. S. M.; Rodriguez, J. I.; Jawed, Z. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 1918. doi: 10.1039/B500996K doi: 10.1039/B500996K
30. [30]
  Chamorro, E.; Chattaraj, P. K.; Fuentealba, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7068. doi: 10.1021/jp035435y doi: 10.1021/jp035435y
31. [31]
  Parthasarathi, R.; Elango, M.; Subramanian, V.; Chattaraj, P. K. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005, 113, 257. doi: 10.1007/s00214-005-0634-3 doi: 10.1007/s00214-005-0634-3
32. [32]
  González, M. M.; Hernández-Castillo, D.; Montero-Cabrera, L. A.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2017, e25444.doi: 10.1002/qua.25444 doi: 10.1002/qua.25444
33. [33]
  Moens, J.; Jaque, P.; De Proft, F.; Geerlings, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 6023. doi: 10.1021/jp711652a doi: 10.1021/jp711652a
34. [34]
  Moens, J.; Geerlings, P.; Roos, G. Chem. -A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8174. doi: 10.1002/chem.200601896 doi: 10.1002/chem.200601896
35. [35]
  Moens, J.; Roos, G.; Jaque, P.; Proft, F.; Geerlings, P. Chem. -A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9331. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700547 doi: 10.1002/chem.200700547
36. [36]
  Parthasarathi, R.; Padmanabhan, J.; Subramanian, V.; Maiti, B.; Chattaraj, P. K. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 535.
37. [37]
  Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; Roy, D. R.; Chattaraj, P. K. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5533. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.08.013 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.08.013
38. [38]
  Rétey, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1647, 179.doi: 10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00091-8 doi: 10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00091-8
39. [39]
  Rosenkranz, H. S.; Klopman, G.; Zhang, Y.; Graham, C.; Karol, M. H. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 129. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107129
40. [40]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 046101.doi: 10.1063/1.4974987 doi: 10.1063/1.4974987
41. [41]
  Pan, S.; Sola, M.; Chattaraj, P. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 1843. doi: 10.1021/jp312750n doi: 10.1021/jp312750n
42. [42]
  Morell, C.; Labet, V.; Grand, A.; Chermette, H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 3414. doi: 10.1039/B818534D doi: 10.1039/B818534D
43. [43]
  Chattaraj, P. K. Indian J. Phys. Proc. Indian Assoc. Cultiv. Sci. 2007, 81, 871
44. [44]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Chattaraj, P. K.; Ayers, P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 124103. doi: 10.1063/1.4996443 doi: 10.1063/1.4996443
45. [45]
  Gazquez, J. L.; Cedillo, A.; Vela, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 1966. doi: 10.1021/jp065459f doi: 10.1021/jp065459f
46. [46]
  Chamorro, E.; Duque-Noreña, M.; Perez, P. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 896, 73. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.11.009
47. [47]
  Chamorro, E.; Duque-Noreña, M.; Perez, P. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 901, 145. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.01.014 doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.01.014
48. [48]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Gazquez, J. L.; Ayers, P. W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, submitted.
49. [49]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 214113.doi: 10.1063/1.4984611 doi: 10.1063/1.4984611
50. [50]
  Parr, R. G.; Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512.doi: 10.1021/ja00364a005 doi: 10.1021/ja00364a005
51. [51]
  Parr, R. G.; Donnelly, R. A.; Levy, M.; Palke, W. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 3801. doi: 10.1063/1.436185 doi: 10.1063/1.436185
52. [52]
  Sanderson, R. T. Science 1951, 114, 670. doi: 10.1126/science.114.2973.670 doi: 10.1126/science.114.2973.670
53. [53]
  Galvan, M.; Vela, A.; Gazquez, J. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 6470. doi: 10.1021/j100333a056 doi: 10.1021/j100333a056
54. [54]
  Vargas, R.; Galvan, M.; Vela, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3134. doi: 10.1021/jp972984t doi: 10.1021/jp972984t
55. [55]
  Galvan, M.; Vargas, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1625.doi: 10.1021/j100183a026 doi: 10.1021/j100183a026
56. [56]
  Ghanty, T. K.; Ghosh, S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3943. doi: 10.1021/ja00088a033 doi: 10.1021/ja00088a033
57. [57]
  Chamorro, E.; Santos, J. C.; Escobar, C. A.; Perez, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 431, 210. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.09.072 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.09.072
58. [58]
  Chamorro, E.; Perez, P.; De Proft, F.; Geerlings, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 044105. doi: 10.1063/1.2161187 doi: 10.1063/1.2161187
59. [59]
  Perez, P.; Chamorro, E.; Ayers, P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 204108. doi: 10.1063/1.2916714 doi: 10.1063/1.2916714
60. [60]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Ayers, P. W. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 239. doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1995-5 doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1995-5
61. [61]
  Cardenas, C.; Heidar Zadeh, F.; Ayers, P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 25721. doi: 10.1039/C6CP04533B doi: 10.1039/C6CP04533B
62. [62]
  Perdew, J. P.; Parr, R. G.; Levy, M.; Balduz, J. L., Jr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 1691. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1691 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1691
63. [63]
  Heidar Zadeh, F.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Verstraelen, T.; Bultinck, P.; Ayers, P. W. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2016, 12, 5777. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00494 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00494
64. [64]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Ayers, P. W. Conceptual Density Functional Theory and Its Applications in the Chemical Domain; Islam, N., Kaya, S., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: NJ, USA, in press.
65. [65]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Ayers, P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 244112. doi: 10.1063/1.4953557 doi: 10.1063/1.4953557
66. [66]
  Ayers, P. W.; Parr, R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 054111. doi: 10.1063/1.2957900 doi: 10.1063/1.2957900
67. [67]
  Ayers, P. W.; Parr, R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 184108. doi: 10.1063/1.2918731 doi: 10.1063/1.2918731
68. [68]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Ayers, P. W.; Gazquez, J. L.; Vela, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 094105. doi: 10.1063/1.4999761 doi: 10.1063/1.4999761
69. [69]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Heidar-Zadeh, F.; Ayers, P. W.; Gazquez, J. L.; Vela, A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 11588.doi: 10.1039/C7CP00224F doi: 10.1039/C7CP00224F
70. [70]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Ayers, P. W.; Gazquez, J. L.; Vela, A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 13687. doi: 10.1039/C7CP00692F doi: 10.1039/C7CP00692F
71. [71]
  Polanco-Ramírez, C. A.; Franco-Pérez, M.; Carmona-Espíndola, J.; Gazquez, J. L.; Ayers, P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 12355. doi: 10.1039/C7CP00691H doi: 10.1039/C7CP00691H
72. [72]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Ayers, P.; Gazquez, J. L.; Vela, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 244117. doi: 10.1063/1.4938422 doi: 10.1063/1.4938422
73. [73]
  Franco-Pérez, M.; Gazquez, J. L.; Ayers, P.; Vela, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 154103. doi: 10.1063/1.4932539 doi: 10.1063/1.4932539
74. [74]
  Malek, A.; Balawender, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 054104.doi: 10.1063/1.4906555 doi: 10.1063/1.4906555
75. [75]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Ayers, P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 15070. doi: 10.1039/c6cp00939e doi: 10.1039/c6cp00939e
76. [76]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2017, 136, 76.doi: 10.1007/s00214-017-2109-8 doi: 10.1007/s00214-017-2109-8
77. [77]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Ayers, P. W. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 172. doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1924-7 doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1924-7
78. [78]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 189.doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1945-2 doi: 10.1007/s00214-016-1945-2
79. [79]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; González, M. M.; Ayers, P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 22235. doi: 10.1039/c6cp03213c doi: 10.1039/c6cp03213c
80. [80]
  Klopman, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 223.doi: 10.1021/ja01004a002 doi: 10.1021/ja01004a002
81. [81]
  Klopman, G.; Hudson, R. F. Theor. Chim. Act. 1967, 8, 165.doi: 10.1007/bf00526373 doi: 10.1007/bf00526373
82. [82]
  Klopman, G.; Klopman, G. Chemical Reactivity and Reaction Paths; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1974; p. 55.
83. [83]
  Hudson, R. F.; Klopman, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 12, 1103.doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)90645-2 doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)90645-2
84. [84]
  Salem, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 553.doi: 10.1021/ja01005a002 doi: 10.1021/ja01005a002
85. [85]
  Salem, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 543.doi: 10.1021/ja01005a001 doi: 10.1021/ja01005a001
86. [86]
  Salem, L. Chem. Br. 1969, 5, 449.
87. [87]
  Witten, I. H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M. A.; Pal, C. J. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017.
88. [88]
  Gertrudes, J. C.; Maltarollo, V. G.; Silva, R. A.; Oliveira, P. R.; Honorio, K. M.; da Silva, A. B. F. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 4289. doi: 10.2174/092986712802884259 doi: 10.2174/092986712802884259
89. [89]
  Carrera, G.; Gupta, S.; Aires-de-Sousa, J. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2009, 23, 419. doi: 10.1007/s10822-009-9275-2 doi: 10.1007/s10822-009-9275-2
90. [90]
  Dietterich, T. G. Ai Mag. 1997, 18, 97. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v18i4.1324 doi: 10.1609/aimag.v18i4.1324
91. [91]
  Carbonell, J. G.; Michalski, R. S.; Mitchell, T. M. Machine Learning: an Artificial Intelligence Approach; Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., Mitchell, T. M., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1983; p. 3.doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5_1
92. [92]
  Lino, A.; Rocha, A.; Sizo, A. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 31, 2061. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-169045 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-169045
93. [93]
  Affenzeller, M.; Winkler, S. M.; Kronberger, G.; Kommenda, M.; Burlacu, B.; Wagner, S. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XI; Riolo, R., Moore, J. H., Kotanchek, M., Eds.; Springer New York: New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 175.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0375-7_10 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0375-7_10
94. [94]
  Billard, L.; Diday, E. Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis: Recent Advances and Applications; Jajuga, K., Sokolowski, A., Bock, H. H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2012.
95. [95]
  Billard, L.; Diday, E. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2003, 98, 470.doi: 10.1198/016214503000242 doi: 10.1198/016214503000242
96. [96]
  Billard, L.; Diday, E. Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods; Kiers, H. A. L., Rasson, J.-P., Groenen, P. J. F., Schader, M., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; p. 369. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59789-3_58 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59789-3_58
97. [97]
  Schmidt, M. D.; Vallabhajosyula, R. R.; Jenkins, J. W.; Hood, J. E.; Soni, A. S.; Wikswo, J. P.; Lipson, H. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8, 055011. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/5/055011 doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/5/055011
98. [98]
  Schmidt, M. W.; Lipson, H. Science 2009, 324, 81.doi: 10.1126/science.1165893 doi: 10.1126/science.1165893
99. [99]
  Bongard, J.; Lipson, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9943.doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609476104 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609476104
100. [100]
  Quade, M.; Abel, M.; Shafi, K.; Niven, R. K. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 012214. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.012214 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.012214
101. [101]
  Koza, J. R. 2nd International IEEE Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence, 1990; p. 819.
102. [102]
  Sharma, S.; Tambe, S. S. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 85, 89.doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.02.007 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.02.007
103. [103]
  Langdon, W. B.; Poli, R. Found. Genet. Program.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2013.
104. [104]
  O'Neil, M.; Ryan, C. Grammatical Evolution: Evolutionary Automatic Programming in an Arbitrary Language; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; p. 33. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0447-4_4 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0447-4_4
105. [105]
  O'Neil, M.; Ryan, C. Grammatical Evolution: Evolutionary Automatic Programming in an Arbitrary Language; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; p. 79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0447-4_7 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0447-4_7
106. [106]
  Ryan, C.; Collins, J.; Neill, M. O. Genetic Programming: First European Workshop, EuroGP'98 Paris, France, April 14–15, 1998 Proceedings; Banzhaf, W., Poli, R., Schoenauer, M., Fogarty, T. C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1998;, p. 83.doi: 10.1007/BFb0055930 doi: 10.1007/BFb0055930
107. [107]
  Luke, S.; Spector, L. Genetic Programming 1997: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference (GP97); Koza, J., Ed.; San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997; p. 240.
108. [108]
  Spears, W. M.; Anand, V. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS '91 Charlotte, N. C., USA, October 16–19, 1991 Proceedings; Ras, Z. W., Zemankova, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; p. 409.doi: 10.1007/3-540-54563-8_104 doi: 10.1007/3-540-54563-8_104
109. [109]
  Chomsky, N. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956, 2, 113. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813 doi: 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
110. [110]
  Ginsburg, S. The Mathematical Theory of Context Free Languages; McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
111. [111]
  Temkin, J. M.; Gilder, M. R. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2046.doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg279 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg279
112. [112]
  Trelea, I. C. Inf. Proc. Lett. 2003, 85, 317.doi: 10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00447-7 doi: 10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00447-7
113. [113]
  Mayr, H. http://www.cup.lmu.de/oc/mayr/reaktionsdatenbank/; Vol. 2017 (accessed Oct 30, 2017).
114. [114]
  Mayr, H. http://www.cup.uni-muenchen.de/oc/mayr/DBintro.html; Vol. 2017 (accessed Oct 30, 2017).
115. [115]
  Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; et al. Gaussian 09; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
116. [116]
  Wagner, S.; Kronberger, G.; Beham, A.; Kommenda, M.; Scheibenpflug, A.; Pitzer, E.; Vonolfen, S.; Kofler, M.; Winkler, S.; Dorfer, V.; et al. Advanced Methods and Applications in Computational Intelligence; Klempous, R., Nikodem, J., Jacak, W., Chaczko, Z., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; p. 197. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01436-4_10 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01436-4_10
117. [117]
  Yang, W. T.; Mortier, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5708.doi: 10.1021/ja00279a008 doi: 10.1021/ja00279a008
118. [118]
  Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 658, 328.doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.06.068 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.06.068
119. [119]
  Zielinski, F.; Tognetti, V.; Joubert, L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012, 527, 67. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.01.011 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.01.011
120. [120]
  Bultinck, P.; Fias, S.; Alsenoy, C. V.; Ayers, P. W.; Carbó-Dorca, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 034102. doi: 10.1063/1.2749518 doi: 10.1063/1.2749518
1. [1]
  Ling Tang , Yan Wan , Yangming Lin . Lowering the kinetic barrier via enhancing electrophilicity of surface oxygen to boost acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(11): 100345-100345. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100345
2. [2]
  Lei Shi . Nucleophilicity and Electrophilicity of Radicals. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(11): 131-135. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202402018
3. [3]
  Maitri Bhattacharjee , Rekha Boruah Smriti , R. N. Dutta Purkayastha , Waldemar Maniukiewicz , Shubhamoy Chowdhury , Debasish Maiti , Tamanna Akhtar . Synthesis, structural characterization, bio-activity, and density functional theory calculation on Cu(Ⅱ) complexes with hydrazone-based Schiff base ligands. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(7): 1409-1422. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240007
4. [4]
  Ziyang Yin , Lingbin Xie , Weinan Yin , Ting Zhi , Kang Chen , Junan Pan , Yingbo Zhang , Jingwen Li , Longlu Wang . Advanced development of grain boundaries in TMDs from fundamentals to hydrogen evolution application. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 108628-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108628
5. [5]
  Zhihao Gu , Jiabo Le , Hehe Wei , Zehui Sun , Mahmoud Elsayed Hafez , Wei Ma . Unveiling the intrinsic properties of single NiZnFeO_x entity for promoting electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108849-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108849
6. [6]
  Botao Gao , He Qi , Hui Liu , Jun Chen . Role of polarization evolution in the hysteresis effect of Pb-based antiferroelecrtics. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108598-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108598
7. [7]
  Jing Cao , Dezheng Zhang , Bianqing Ren , Ping Song , Weilin Xu . Mn incorporated RuO₂ nanocrystals as an efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction in acid and alkaline. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109863-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109863
8. [8]
  Xiangyuan Zhao , Jinjin Wang , Jinzhao Kang , Xiaomei Wang , Hong Yu , Cheng-Feng Du . Ni nanoparticles anchoring on vacuum treated Mo2TiC2Tx MXene for enhanced hydrogen evolution activity. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(10): 100159-100159. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100159
9. [9]
  Haibin Yang , Duowen Ma , Yang Li , Qinghe Zhao , Feng Pan , Shisheng Zheng , Zirui Lou . Mo doped Ru-based cluster to promote alkaline hydrogen evolution with ultra-low Ru loading. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(11): 100031-100031. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100031
10. [10]
  Run-Han Li , Tian-Yi Dang , Wei Guan , Jiang Liu , Ya-Qian Lan , Zhong-Min Su . Evolution exploration and structure prediction of Keggin-type group IVB metal-oxo clusters. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 108805-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108805
11. [11]
  Tengjia Ni , Xianbiao Hou , Huanlei Wang , Lei Chu , Shuixing Dai , Minghua Huang . Controllable defect engineering based on cobalt metal-organic framework for boosting oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(1): 100210-100210. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100210
12. [12]
  Jiayu Xu , Meng Li , Baoxia Dong , Ligang Feng . Fully fluorinated hybrid zeolite imidazole/Prussian blue analogs with combined advantages for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 108798-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108798
13. [13]
  Jiao Li , Chenyang Zhang , Chuhan Wu , Yan Liu , Xuejian Zhang , Xiao Li , Yongtao Li , Jing Sun , Zhongmin Su . Defined organic-octamolybdate crystalline superstructures derived Mo₂C@C as efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 108782-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108782
14. [14]
  Sifan Du , Yuan Wang , Fulin Wang , Tianyu Wang , Li Zhang , Minghua Liu . Evolution of hollow nanosphere to microtube in the self-assembly of chiral dansyl derivatives and inversed circularly polarized luminescence. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109256-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109256
15. [15]
  Bin Dong , Ning Yu , Qiu-Yue Wang , Jing-Ke Ren , Xin-Yu Zhang , Zhi-Jie Zhang , Ruo-Yao Fan , Da-Peng Liu , Yong-Ming Chai . Double active sites promoting hydrogen evolution activity and stability of CoRuOH/Co₂P by rapid hydrolysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109221-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109221
16. [16]
  Li Li , Fanpeng Chen , Bohang Zhao , Yifu Yu . Understanding of the structural evolution of catalysts and identification of active species during CO₂ conversion. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109240-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109240
17. [17]
  Minying Wu , Xueliang Fan , Wenbiao Zhang , Bin Chen , Tong Ye , Qian Zhang , Yuanyuan Fang , Yajun Wang , Yi Tang . Highly dispersed Ru nanospecies on N-doped carbon/MXene composite for highly efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109258-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109258
18. [18]
  Wengao Zeng , Yuchen Dong , Xiaoyuan Ye , Ziying Zhang , Tuo Zhang , Xiangjiu Guan , Liejin Guo . Crystalline carbon nitride with in-plane built-in electric field accelerates carrier separation for excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109252-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109252
19. [19]
  Lian Sun , Honglei Wang , Ming Ma , Tingting Cao , Leilei Zhang , Xingui Zhou . Shape and composition evolution of Pt and Pt₃M nanocrystals under HCl chemical etching. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109188-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109188
20. [20]
  Bicheng Zhu , Jingsan Xu . S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst for H2 evolution coupled with organic oxidation. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(8): 100327-100327. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100327

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(7)
Abstract views(356)
HTML views(10)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142