Citation: XU Zhao-Ying, ZHAO Li-Ling, CAO Zan-Xia, WANG Ji-Hua. Effects of the Residue Mutations on the Segment of P53-DNA Binding Region Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, ;2012, 28(07): 1665-1675. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201204182 shu

Effects of the Residue Mutations on the Segment of P53-DNA Binding Region Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation

XU Zhao-Ying ^1,3 ,
ZHAO Li-Ling ^1,2 ,
CAO Zan-Xia ^1,2 ,
WANG Ji-Hua ^1,2,

1.
1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Macromolecular Biophysics (Dezhou University), Dezhou 253023, Shandong Province, P. R. China;
2. Department of Physics, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, Shandong Province, P. R. China;
3. College of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, P. R. China

Received Date: 10 January 2012
Available Online: 18 April 2012
Fund Project: 国家自然科学基金(30970561, 31000324) (30970561, 31000324)山东省自然科学基金(2009ZRA14027, 2009ZRA14028)资助项目 (2009ZRA14027, 2009ZRA14028)

The structural characteristics of the peptide segment of the P53-DNA binding domain (from residue 230 to 258) were studied using molecular dynamics simulations with different mutations, including R249S, R248W, and G245S. Four independent simulations, including the wild-type segment wtP53, onepoint mutation segment P53-R249S, two-point mutation segment P53-R249S/R248W, and three-point mutation segment P53-R249S/R248W/G245S, were performed using the GROMACS software package and GROMOS 43A1 force field. Each simulation was run for 500 ns. The results indicated that mutation R249S affected the formation of the secondary structure for some residues, but had little impact on the mode of the ternary structure and made the segment more stable than the wild-type segment. In contrast, the R249S/R248W mutation strengthened the effect of R249S on the segment and induced a significant change in the ternary structure, with the structure of the two-point mutation segment R249S/R248W existing as a double-turn motif and becoming more stable. Moreover, the G245S mutation had the opposite effect on the segment, decreasing or eliminating entirely the effects caused by the R249S/R248W mutation on the segment. This study provided important understanding of the molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis and the design of a new drug.
- P53 protein,
- Residue mutation,
- Structural change,
- Molecular dynamics simulation,
- Structure heterogeneity
1. [1]
  
  (1) Attardi, L. D.; Donehower, L. A. Mutat. Res. 2005, 576 (1-2),4. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.08.022
2. [2]
  (2) Fazeli, A.; Steen, R. G.; Dickinson, S. L.; Bautista, D.; Dietrich,W. F.; Bronson, R. T.; Bresalier, R. S.; Lander, E. S.; Costa, J.;Weinberg, R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94 (19),10199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10199
3. [3]
  (3) Wang,W.; El-Deiry,W. S. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2008, 20 (1), 90.doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3282f31d6f
4. [4]
  (4) Barlev, N. A.; Sayan, B. S.; Candi, E.; Okorokov, A. L. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17 (2), 373. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.73
5. [5]
  (5) Botcheva, K.; McCorkle, S. R.; McCombie,W. R.; Dunn, J. J.;Anderson, C.W. Cell Cycle 2011, 10 (24), 4237. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.24.18383
6. [6]
  (6) Romer, L.; Klein, C.; Dehner, A.; Kessler, H.; Buchner, J.Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. Engl. 2006, 45 (39), 6440. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600611
7. [7]
  (7) Cho, Y.; rina, S.; Jeffrey, P. D.; Pavletich, N. P. Science 1994,265 (5170), 346. doi: 10.1126/science.8023157
8. [8]
  (8) Joerger, A. C.; Fersht, A. R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77,557. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060806.091238
9. [9]
  (9) Rustandi, R. R.; Baldisseri, D. M.;Weber, D. J. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7 (7), 570. doi: 10.1038/76797
10. [10]
  (10) Tidow, H.; Melero, R.; Mylonas, E.; Freund, S. M.; Grossmann,J. G.; Carazo, J. M.; Svergun, D. I.; Valle, M.; Fersht, A. R.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104 (30), 12324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705069104
11. [11]
  (11) Dawson, R.; Muller, L.; Dehner, A.; Klein, C.; Kessler, H.;Buchner, J. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332 (5), 1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.008
12. [12]
  (12) Terakawa, T.; Takada, S. Biophys. J. 2011, 101 (6), 1450. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.003
13. [13]
  (13) Pavletich, N. P.; Chambers, K. A.; Pabo, C. O. Genes Dev. 1993,7 (12B), 2556. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12b.2556
14. [14]
  (14) Weinberg, R. L.; Veprintsev, D. B.; Fersht, A. R. J. Mol. Biol.2004, 341 (5), 1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.071
15. [15]
  (15) Bullock, A. N.; Fersht, A. R. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1 (1),68. doi: 10.1038/35094077
16. [16]
  (16) Petitjean, A.; Achatz, M. I.; Borresen-Dale, A. L.; Hainaut, P.;Olivier, M. Oncogene 2007, 26 (15), 2157. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210302
17. [17]
  (17) Soussi, T. Adv. Cancer Res. 2011, 110, 107. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386469-7.00005-0
18. [18]
  (18) Ang, H. C.; Joerger, A. C.; Mayer, S.; Fersht, A. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281 (31), 21934. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604209200
19. [19]
  (19) Tidow, H.; Veprintsev, D. B.; Freund, S. M.; Fersht, A. R.J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281 (43), 32526. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604725200
20. [20]
  (20) Szymanska, K.; Chen, J. G.; Cui, Y.; ng, Y. Y.; Turner, P. C.;Villar, S.;Wild, C. P.; Parkin, D. M.; Hainaut, P. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18 (5), 1638. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1102
21. [21]
  (21) uas, D.; Shi, H.; Hainaut, P. Cancer Lett. 2009, 286 (1), 29.doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.02.057
22. [22]
  (22) Friedler, A.; DeDecker, B. S.; Freund, S. M.; Blair, C.; Rudiger,S.; Fersht, A. R. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 336 (1), 187. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.005
23. [23]
  (23) Suad, O.; Rozenberg, H.; Brosh, R.; Diskin-Posner, Y.; Kessler,N.; Shimon, L. J.; Frolow, F.; Liran, A.; Rotter, V.; Shakked, Z.J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 385 (1), 249.
24. [24]
  (24) Rauf, S. M.; Ismael, M.; Sahu, K. K.; Suzuki, A.; Koyama, M.;Tsuboi, H.; Hatakeyama, N.; Endou, A.; Takaba, H.; Del Carpio,C. A.; Kubo, M.; Miyamoto, A. Comput. Biol. Med. 2010, 40 (5), 498. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.03.004
25. [25]
  (25) Zhao, J.; Guo, Z. K. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2008, 36 (10), 186.[赵晶, 郭泽坤. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,36 (10), 186.]
26. [26]
  (26) Wang, R.; ng, Z. H.; Jiang, L. X.; Sun, D. J.; Jiao, A. H.;Chen, J.; Zhang, L. M. China Oncology 2010, 21 (3), 177.
27. [27]
  (27) Barakat, K.; Issack, B. B.; Stepanova, M.; Tuszynski, J. PLos One 2011, 6 (11), e27651.
28. [28]
  (28) Cao, Z.; Liu, L.;Wu, P.;Wang, J. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin.2011, 43 (3), 172.
29. [29]
  (29) Shaw, D. E.; Maragakis, P.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Dror,R. O.; Eastwood, M. P.; Bank, J. A.; Jumper, J. M.; Salmon, J.K.; Shan, Y.;Wriggers,W. Science 2010, 330 (6), 341. doi: 10.1126/science.1187409
30. [30]
  (30) Guex, N.; Peitsch, M. C. Electrophoresis 1997, 18 (15), 2714.doi: 10.1002/elps.1150181505
31. [31]
  (31) Guex, N.; Peitsch, M. C.; Schwede, T. Electrophoresis 2009, 30 (Suppl 1), S162.
32. [32]
  (32) Kutzner, C.; Czub, J.; Grubmuller, H. J. Chem. Theory Comput.2011, 7 (5), 1381. doi: 10.1021/ct100666v
33. [33]
  (33) van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark,A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (16),1701. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291
34. [34]
  (34) Lin, Z.; van Gunsteren,W. F.; Liu, H. J. Comput. Chem. 2011,32 (10), 2290. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21818
35. [35]
  (35) Stocker, U.; van Gunsteren,W. F. Proteins 2000, 40 (1),145. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000701)40:1<145:AIDPROT160>3.0.CO;2-Y
36. [36]
  (36) Berlinski, E.;Wojcikowski, C.; Horoszek-Maziarz, S.; Krupa-Wojciechowska, B. Endokrynol Pol. 1981, 32 (2), 117.
37. [37]
  (37) Chatterjee, S.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H.; Lynden-Bell,R. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128 (12), 124511. doi: 10.1063/1.2841127
38. [38]
  (38) Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; Gunsteren,W. F. V.J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81 (8), 3684. doi: 10.1063/1.448118
39. [39]
  (39) Frishman, D.; Ar s, P. Proteins 1995, 23 (4), 566. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230412
40. [40]
  (40) Hu, H.; Elstner, M.; Hermans, J. Proteins 2003, 50 (3), 1131.
41. [41]
  (41) Nikolova, P. V.;Wong, K. B.; DeDecker, B.; Henckel, J.; Fersht,A. R. EMBO J. 2000, 19 (3), 370. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.3.370
42. [42]
  (42) Wong, K. B.; DeDecker, B. S.; Freund, S. M.; Proctor, M. R.;Bycroft, M.; Fersht, A. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999,96 (15), 8438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8438
43. [43]
  (43) Joerger, A. C.; Ang, H. C.; Veprintsev, D. B.; Blair, C. M.;Fersht, A. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280 (16), 16030. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500179200
44. [44]
  (44) Francis, C. J.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Best, R. B.; Vendruscolo, M.Proteins 2006, 65 (1), 145. doi: 10.1002/prot.21077
45. [45]
  (45) Cao, Z.; Liu, L.;Wang, J. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2010, 28 (3),343.
46. [46]
  (46) Qiao, X.; Chen, Y.W. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2011, 2011,601672.
1. [1]
  Congying Lu , Fei Zhong , Zhenyu Yuan , Shuaibing Li , Jiayao Li , Jiewen Liu , Xianyang Hu , Liqun Sun , Rui Li , Meijuan Hu . Experimental Improvement of Surfactant Interface Chemistry: An Integrated Design for the Fusion of Experiment and Simulation. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 283-293. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202308097
2. [2]
  Zhi Zhou , Yu-E Lian , Yuqing Li , Hui Gao , Wei Yi . New Insights into the Molecular Mechanism Behind Clinical Tragedies of “Cephalosporin with Alcohol”. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(3): 42-51. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202403104
3. [3]
  Zhenming Xu , Yibo Wang , Zhenhui Liu , Duo Chen , Mingbo Zheng , Laifa Shen . Experimental Design of Computational Materials Science and Computational Chemistry Courses Based on the Bohrium Scientific Computing Cloud Platform. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(3): 36-41. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202403096
4. [4]
  Yaping Li , Sai An , Aiqing Cao , Shilong Li , Ming Lei . The Application of Molecular Simulation Software in Structural Chemistry Education: First-Principles Calculation of NiFe Layered Double Hydroxide. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(3): 160-170. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202405185
5. [5]
  Shule Liu . Application of SPC/E Water Model in Molecular Dynamics Teaching Experiments. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(4): 338-342. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202310029
6. [6]
  You Wu , Chang Cheng , Kezhen Qi , Bei Cheng , Jianjun Zhang , Jiaguo Yu , Liuyang Zhang . ZnO/D-A共轭聚合物S型异质结高效光催化产H₂O₂及其电荷转移动力学研究. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2406027-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202406027
7. [7]
  Yan Li , Xinze Wang , Xue Yao , Shouyun Yu . 基于激发态手性铜催化的烯烃E→Z异构的动力学拆分——推荐一个本科生综合化学实验. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(5): 1-10. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202309053
8. [8]
  Shanghua Li , Malin Li , Xiwen Chi , Xin Yin , Zhaodi Luo , Jihong Yu . 基于高离子迁移动力学的取向ZnQ分子筛保护层实现高稳定水系锌金属负极的构筑. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(1): 2309003-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309003
9. [9]
  Yu Guo , Zhiwei Huang , Yuqing Hu , Junzhe Li , Jie Xu . 钠离子电池中铁基异质结构负极材料的最新研究进展. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(3): 2311015-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311015
10. [10]
  Yongwei ZHANG , Chuang ZHU , Wenbin WU , Yongyong MA , Heng YANG . Efficient hydrogen evolution reaction activity induced by ZnSe@nitrogen doped porous carbon heterojunction. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(4): 650-660. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240386
11. [11]
  Wenyan Dan , Weijie Li , Xiaogang Wang . The Technical Analysis of Visual Software ShelXle for Refinement of Small Molecular Crystal Structure. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 63-69. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202302060
12. [12]
  Pei Li , Yuenan Zheng , Zhankai Liu , An-Hui Lu . Boron-Containing MFI Zeolite: Microstructure Control and Its Performance of Propane Oxidative Dehydrogenation. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(4): 100034-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202406012
13. [13]
  Asif Hassan Raza , Shumail Farhan , Zhixian Yu , Yan Wu . 用于高效制氢的双S型ZnS/ZnO/CdS异质结构光催化剂. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2406020-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202406020
14. [14]
  Yaling Chen . Basic Theory and Competitive Exam Analysis of Dynamic Isotope Effect. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(8): 403-410. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202311093
15. [15]
  Jinfu Ma , Hui Lu , Jiandong Wu , Zhongli Zou . Teaching Design of Electrochemical Principles Course Based on “Cognitive Laws”: Kinetics of Electron Transfer Steps. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 174-177. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202309052
16. [16]
  Yeyun Zhang , Ling Fan , Yanmei Wang , Zhenfeng Shang . Development and Application of Kinetic Reaction Flasks in Physical Chemistry Experimental Teaching. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(4): 100-106. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202308044
17. [17]
  Baitong Wei , Jinxin Guo , Xigong Liu , Rongxiu Zhu , Lei Liu . Theoretical Study on the Structure, Stability of Hydrocarbon Free Radicals and Selectivity of Alkane Chlorination Reaction. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(3): 402-407. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202406003
18. [18]
  Wenliang Wang , Weina Wang , Sufan Wang , Tian Sheng , Tao Zhou , Nan Wei . “Schrödinger Equation – Approximate Models – Core Concepts – Simple Applications”: Constructing a Logical Framework and Knowledge Graph of Atom and Molecule Structures. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(8): 338-343. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202312084
19. [19]
  Xuzhen Wang , Xinkui Wang , Dongxu Tian , Wei Liu . Enhancing the Comprehensive Quality and Innovation Abilities of Graduate Students through a “Student-Centered, Dual Integration and Dual Drive” Teaching Model: A Case Study in the Course of Chemical Reaction Kinetics. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(6): 160-165. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202401074
20. [20]
  Dexin Tan , Limin Liang , Baoyi Lv , Huiwen Guan , Haicheng Chen , Yanli Wang . Exploring Reverse Teaching Practices in Physical Chemistry Experiment Courses: A Case Study on Chemical Reaction Kinetics. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(11): 79-86. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202403048

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(889)
Abstract views(2136)
HTML views(67)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142