Preparation and triethylamine sensing performance of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructur

Liyong DU Yi LIU Guoli YANG

Citation:  Liyong DU, Yi LIU, Guoli YANG. Preparation and triethylamine sensing performance of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructur[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(4): 729-740. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240404 shu

ZnSnO3/NiO异质结构的制备及其三乙胺气敏性能

    通讯作者: 杜丽勇, 495431287@qq.com; duliyong@tyu.edu.cn
    杨国利, galiyang@126.com
  • 基金项目:

    山西省基础研究计划 202103021223004

    山西省基础研究计划 202303021222263

    国家自然科学基金 62404150

    太原学院重点科研项目 24TYZD01

    海南省自然科学基金 423RC434

摘要: 在本研究中, 我们采用共沉淀法和退火处理合成了ZnSnO3/NiO异质结构。随后对基于上述敏感材料的传感器进行了气敏特性分析。结果表明, 当Ni与Zn的物质的量之比为1∶2时, 传感器性能最佳。具体来说, ZnSnO3/NiO-2基传感器在220℃下对100 μL·L-1的三乙胺气体的响应值达到70.6, 是纯ZnSnO3基传感器的6.1倍。并且该传感器还具有短的响应/恢复时间(1 s/18 s)、良好的选择性、重复性以及长期稳定性。此外, 对增强的气敏传感机制进行了系统地研究。

English

  • Triethylamine (TEA), which is also referred to as N, N-diethylamine, belongs to a category of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are noted for their strong and distinctive smell. TEA is utilized in numerous domains. For example, it acts as a fundamental substance, a solvent, and a catalyst in the process of industrial synthesis. Additionally, it is employed in the preparation of rubber vulcanization accelerators, enamel hardeners, liquid rocket propellants, and acid collectors[1-2]. In the pharmaceutical industry, TEA is utilized in the synthesis of drugs such as vitamin B6, cefradine, berberine hydrochloride, pioneer Ⅳ, and verapamil. However, TEA is known to cause significant irritation to the mucous membranes and skin. Inhalation of its vapors can lead to damage to the central nervous system, mucosal tissues, and liver, and may even result in death[3-5]. Consequently, it is crucial to create an efficient gas sensor for identifying TEA gas.

    So far, gas sensors that utilize metal oxide semiconductors have been widely applied in gas detection tasks owing to their affordability, straightforward operation and consistent performance[6-8]. In response to the growing complexity of gas monitoring demands, it is acknowledged that there is a necessity to create advanced gas sensors, where the fundamental challenge is significantly tied to the innovation and production of novel sensitive materials. In recent years, numerous ternary metal oxides have been synthesized through advancements in nanotechnology and chemical synthesis techniques, offering advantages such as unique crystal structures, abundant defect states, and controllable chemical compositions[9-11]. These materials have emerged as highly promising candidates for gas sensing. Among them, ZnSnO3, recognized as a common n-type semiconductor, has been utilized for the identification of VOCs[12-15]. However, low response values and slow response/recovery speeds significantly hinder their further research and application.

    To address these issues, it is essential to design and modify the microstructure of ZnSnO3 materials. Hollow structures are recognized for creating swift channels for gas diffusion and offering a substantial specific surface area[16-17], thereby enhancing the surface interaction between oxygen species and TEA molecules. For instance, Liu et al. synthesized Al/Mo co-doped porous Co3O4 hollow tetrahedrons using a simple solvothermal method, achieving a response of 132 to 100 μL·L-1 TEA[18]. Similarly, Yang et al. prepared hollow SnO2/Zn2SnO4 composites, which exhibited a response value of 48 to 100 μL·L-1 TEA[19]. Therefore, the development of ZnSnO3 materials with a hollow structure is imperative.

    The construction of heterostructures is a crucial approach to enhancing the sensing properties of gas sensors, primarily due to their highly efficient charge transfer channels. To date, numerous heterostructures have been synthesized, among which p-n heterostructures are particularly common and frequently demonstrate excellent gas-sensing properties. For example, Yu et al. prepared CuO/ZnSnO3 hollow microspheres using an in-situ precipitation method, finding that the CuO/ZnSnO3 samples exhibited high response values to ethanol[20]. Similarly, Jin et al. reported the synthesis of CuO-coated ZnSnO3 nanorods via thermal evaporation, with these samples showing significant response values to H2S at 100 ℃[21]. Furthermore, Xu et al. fabricated Co3O4-ZnSnO3 arrays through a hydrothermal method, which also displayed high response values to ethanol[22]. Thus, it is anticipated that identifying a suitable p-type semiconductor material in conjunction with ZnSnO3 will yield a high-performance gas sensor. NiO, recognized as a common p-type semiconductor material, has been widely employed in gas sensing because of its advantageous electrical and chemical characteristics[23-24]. As a result, the creation of ZnSnO3-NiO heterostructures is expected to enhance the advancement of a TEA sensor noted for its strong response values and brief response/recovery durations. Furthermore, as far as we are aware, there have been no existing studies on ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures aimed explicitly at TEA detection.

    Inspired by the aforementioned analysis, ZnSnO3 hollow cubes have been prepared using a co-precipitation way followed by an annealing process. Subsequently, varying amounts of NiO nanosheets were attached to the ZnSnO3 surface, resulting in the creation of ZnSnO3/NiO heterojunctions. The gas-sensing properties of the sensors, derived from these samples, have been assessed. Findings show that the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor revealed high response values along with a short response and recovery time to TEA. Furthermore, it displayed excellent selectivity, repeatability and stability over extended periods. A thorough investigation into the improved gas-sensing mechanism has been conducted.

    All the chemicals (AR) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Industrial Corporation and used without further purification. The ZnSnO3 samples were prepared based on the reported method with several modifications[25-26]. In general, 2 mmol of sodium citrate and 2 mmol of ZnCl2 were dissolved into 20 mL of deionized (DI) water. Then a solution of 10 mL of SnCl4·5H2O (0.1 mol·L-1) was mixed with the above solution. After 15 min, 50 mL of NaOH solution (0.41 mol·L-1) was gradually added to this mixture and stirred for 30 min. Subsequently, an additional 30 mL of NaOH solution (2 mol·L-1) was incorporated. The resulting white precipitate was then washed three times with anhydrous ethanol followed by DI water and dried at a temperature of 60 ℃. Finally, the dried products underwent annealing at 450 ℃ for 2 h, resulting in the formation of ZnSnO3 samples.

    Secondly, 0.04 g of the as-obtained ZnSnO3 samples, different amounts of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, 0.04 g of urea, and 0.04 g of polyvinyl pyrrolidone were added into the mixed solution of 70 mL ethanol and 10 mL DI water for stirring. After 10 min, the solution was heated to 70 ℃ and stirred continuously for 10 h. Then the precipitate was rinsed with ethanol and DI water three times and dried at 60 ℃. Finally, the dried powder was annealed at 450 ℃ for 2 h at a heating rate of 1 ℃·min-1. The molar ratios of Ni to Zn in the samples were 1∶4, 1∶2, and 1∶1, respectively, and they were named ZnSnO3/NiO-1, ZnSnO3/NiO-2, and ZnSnO3/NiO-3, respectively.

    The crystalline phase was examined using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) on a Rigaku D/max-2500 diffractometer (40 kV, 30 mA) employing Cu radiation (λ=0.154 18 nm) in a range of 20°-80°. To analyze the morphology and microstructure, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Magellan 400, 2 kV) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, JEM-2200FS, 200 kV) were utilized. Additionally, the chemical composition and elemental valence were investigated through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB MK Ⅱ).

    The gas sensor was prepared according to the previous way[27-28]. In brief, small quantities of ZnSnO3/NiO-based samples were combined with ethanol to create a homogeneous slurry, which was subsequently applied to the alumina tube′s surface. Before this, two Au electrodes with four Pt wires were secured to the alumina tube. The gas sensor then underwent an aging process at 300 ℃ for 24 h to improve its stability. Following this, a Ni-Cr alloy was placed inside the alumina tube to manage the sensor′s temperature by adjusting the current. The gas sensing capabilities were evaluated using a CGS-8 intelligent gas sensing analysis system (Beijing Elite Tech. Co., Ltd., China) under controlled laboratory conditions [(25±5) ℃, (30±5)% RH (relative humidity)]. The response values were calculated as Ra/Rg, with Rg and Ra representing the sensor resistance in the test gas and air, respectively. The response and recovery times (tres and trec) were defined as the duration required to reach 90% of the total change in sensor resistance.

    Fig.S1 (Supporting information) illustrates the PXRD pattern for the ZnSn(OH)6 precursors. The observed diffraction peaks align with the standard peaks associated with the cubic phase of ZnSn(OH)6 (PDF No.74-1825), with no additional peaks detected, indicating that the prepared samples are pristine ZnSn(OH)6. Furthermore, the presence of strong and sharp peaks for ZnSn(OH)6 demonstrates its good crystallinity. Fig. 1 displays the PXRD patterns of ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO composites. The diffraction peaks can be indexed to the standard ZnSnO3 phase. The absence of sharp diffraction peaks with high intensity in this pattern suggests that the resulting samples exhibit poor crystallinity.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  PXRD pattern of ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO composites

    Fig.S2 presents the FESEM image of ZnSn(OH)6 precursors. The image displayed that ZnSn(OH)6 precursors consisted of numerous uniform and well-formed hollow cubes, with a diameter of approximately 2 μm. Fig. 2 displays the FESEM images of both pure ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO samples. It is evident that many hollow cubes were present, and their size was comparable to that of the ZnSn(OH)6 precursors. Furthermore, as the NiO content increased, the number of nanosheets attached to the surface of the ZnSnO3 cubes progressively rose.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  FESEM images: (a, e) pure ZnSnO3, (b, f) ZnSnO3/NiO-1, (c, g) ZnSnO3/NiO-2, and (d, h) ZnSnO3/NiO-3

    The elemental mapping image for ZnSnO3/NiO-2 is presented in Fig. 3, showing a uniform distribution of the elements Zn, Sn, O, and Ni across the sample. The content of NiO in ZnSnO3/NiO-1, ZnSnO3/NiO-2, and ZnSnO3/NiO-3 samples was investigated by X-ray energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis, as shown in Fig.S3a-S3c. As illustrated in the figure, the quantity of NiO corresponds to the amount of the initial reagent introduced.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Elemental mappings of ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    Fig. 4a presents the TEM image of a single ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sample. The figure clearly illustrated a distinct contrast between the inner region of the cube and its outer shell, confirming that the synthesized sample was a hollow cube with a side length of approximately 2 μm, consistent with the results obtained from FESEM. The enlarged TEM image of ZnSnO3/NiO-2 is depicted in Fig. 4b. Notably, numerous NiO nanosheets were observed to be attached to the surface of the ZnSnO3 cube, indicating the formation of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) characterization was conducted on the portion of ZnSnO3/NiO-2 corresponding to the NiO nanosheets, as illustrated in Fig. 4c. The diffraction rings were distinctly visible in the figure, which indicates a polycrystalline structure. Furthermore, these diffraction rings, from innermost to outermost, correspond to the (111), (200), (220), (222), (422), and (511) crystal planes of NiO, respectively. Fig. 4d shows the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of ZnSnO3/NiO-2. The measured lattice spacing in the lamellar region was 0.211 nm, corresponding to the (200) plane of NiO, which confirms that NiO has successfully adhered to the surface of the ZnSnO3 cube.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a, b) TEM, (c) SAED, and (d) HRTEM images of ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    The XPS analysis, depicted in Fig. 5, was conducted to examine the elemental composition and valence states of both pure ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO-2. Fig. 5a presents the full spectrum of ZnSnO3/NiO-2, which predominantly consists of Zn, Sn, and O elements. Additionally, peaks corresponding to the Ni element are also observed in the spectrum. The Zn2p spectrum of ZnSnO3/NiO-2 is illustrated in Fig. 5b. This figure shows that the peaks observed at 1 022.2 and 1 045.4 eV are associated with Zn2p3/2 and Zn2p1/2, respectively, suggesting that the oxidation state of Zn ions in the sample is +2[29]. Fig. 5c displays the Sn3d spectrum of ZnSnO3/NiO-2, with peaks at 486.7 and 495.3 eV attributed to Sn3d5/2 and Sn3d3/2, respectively, confirming that the valence state of Sn ions in the sample is +4[30]. Fig. 5d illustrates the Ni2p spectrum of ZnSnO3/NiO-2, where the peaks at 854.9 and 861.1 eV correspond to Ni2p3/2, while those at 872.9 and 879.4 eV correspond to Ni2p1/2, thus demonstrating the presence of NiO in the sample[31]. Fig. 5e and 5f present the O1s spectra for both pure ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO-2. The findings suggest that the two asymmetrical O1s peaks can be categorized into three separate peaks. The peaks located around 530.1, 530.9, and 531.9 eV are associated with lattice oxygen (OL), oxygen vacancies (OV), and surface-adsorbed oxygen (OC), respectively[32]. Furthermore, the proportions of OL, OV, and OC in pure ZnSnO3 samples were 52.3%, 18.3%, and 29.5%, respectively. In contrast, the proportions of OL, OV, and OC in ZnSnO3/NiO-2 were 37.7%, 26.5%, and 35.8%, respectively. Notably, the attachment of NiO nanosheets to the surface of ZnSnO3 results in a significant increase in the proportion of OV, which is expected to substantially enhance the gas sensitivity of the sensitive material.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  XPS analysis: (a) survey, (b) Zn2p, (c) Sn3d, and (d) Ni2p spectra of ZnSnO3/NiO-2; O1s spectra of (e) pure ZnSnO3 and (f) ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    Fig. 6 shows the detailed formation of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures. The growth process of ZnSn(OH)6 hollow cubes involves a rapid co-precipitation reaction among Zn2+, Sn4+, OH-, and citrate ions, resulting in the swift formation of solid ZnSn(OH)6 cubes due to its cubic crystal structure. With the introduction of an excess amount of OH- ions, these solid cubes engage with OH- ions, resulting in the creation of soluble [Sn(OH)6]2- and [Zn(OH)4]2- [33]. Furthermore, because the external structure of the ZnSn(OH)6 cube is more stable than its internal structure, the solid cube ultimately transforms into a hollow cube[34]. The growth process of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures begins with the high-temperature treatment of the previously generated ZnSn(OH)6 sample, which removes water from the structure and fully converts it to ZnSnO3. When varying amounts of Ni(NO3)2 are added to the ethanol solution containing ZnSnO3, Ni2+ ions adsorb onto the surface of the ZnSnO3 sample. Concurrently, urea in the solution decomposes to release NH3 and CO2, resulting in an alkaline environment. Consequently, Ni2+ ions react with OH- to form Ni(OH)2. After stirring the solution at 70 ℃ for 6 h, Ni(OH)2 uniformly adheres to the surface of the ZnSnO3 cube. Ultimately, ZnSnO3/NiO composites are successfully obtained following an annealing treatment. The relevant chemical reaction equations are as follows:

    $ \mathrm{Zn}^{2+}+\mathrm{Sn}^{4+}+6 \mathrm{OH}^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{ZnSn}(\mathrm{OH})_6 $

    (1)

    $ \mathrm{ZnSn}(\mathrm{OH})_6+4 \mathrm{OH}^{-} \rightarrow\left[\mathrm{Zn}(\mathrm{OH})_4\right]^{2-}+\left[\mathrm{Sn}(\mathrm{OH})_6\right]^{2-} $

    (2)

    $ \mathrm{ZnSn}(\mathrm{OH})_6 \rightarrow \mathrm{ZnSnO}_3+3 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} $

    (3)

    $ \mathrm{CO}\left(\mathrm{NH}_2\right)_2+\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} \rightarrow \mathrm{CO}_2+2 \mathrm{NH}_3 $

    (4)

    $ \mathrm{NH}_3+\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} \rightarrow \mathrm{NH}_3 \cdot \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4^{+}+\mathrm{OH}^{-} $

    (5)

    $ \mathrm{Ni}^{2+}+2 \mathrm{OH}^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{OH})_2 $

    (6)

    $ \mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{OH})_2 \rightarrow \mathrm{NiO}+\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} $

    (7)

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Detailed formation of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures

    The properties of a gas sensor are significantly linked to its operating temperature. As a result, the response measurements of pure ZnSnO3 and NiO sensors, and those based on ZnSnO3/NiO to 100 μL·L-1 TEA were first evaluated at temperatures varying from 180 to 260 ℃, as shown in Fig. 7a. The response values of all five sensors demonstrated a trend of initial increase followed by a decrease, with maximum response values occurring at 220 ℃, indicating that this was their optimal working temperature. At this temperature, a sufficient quantity of energy is generated, leading to a heightened concentration of chemisorbed oxygen species on the surface of the sensor, which improves the sensor′s response values[35]. Nevertheless, as the operating temperature keeps increasing, gas molecules that are adsorbed earlier might volatilize from the material surface before the chemical reaction occurs, resulting in lower response values[36]. Moreover, the response values recorded in sensors enhanced by ZnSnO3/NiO were significantly greater than those of pure ZnSnO3 and NiO sensors, suggesting that incorporating NiO substantially boosted the sensors′ performance. Among these, the ZnSnO3/NiO-2-based sensor exhibited the highest gas response values.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (a) Response values of pure ZnSnO3-, NiO-, and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 100 μL·L-1 TEA at different operating temperatures; (b) Gas selectivity of pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors at 220 ℃

    Gas selectivity is a crucial metric for evaluating sensor performance. Fig. 7b demonstrates the response values of four sensors when exposed to 100 μL·L-1 of VOCs, which comprise ethanol, acetone, methanol, benzene, formaldehyde, and TEA at 220 ℃. Notably, all four sensors demonstrated the highest response values to TEA gas. The response value of the pure ZnSnO3-based sensor to TEA was comparable to its response values to other test gases, indicating a lack of selectivity. In comparison, the response values of the three ZnSnO3/NiO sensors to TEA were considerably greater than their response values to the other tested gases, indicating strong selectivity. This suggests that the incorporation of NiO not only enhances the response values but also improves selectivity.

    Fig. 8a illustrates the response values of ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to TEA concentrations ranging from 5 to 200 μL·L-1 at 220 ℃. As the concentration of TEA increased, the response values of all four sensors also rose correspondingly. Specifically, the response values of pure ZnSnO3-based sensor at 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 μL·L-1 of TEA were 1.2, 3.4, 7.2, 11.5, and 16.1, respectively. The response values increased gradually with rising TEA concentrations, and the sensor reached saturation quickly. In contrast, the ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors exhibited a rapid increase in response to increasing TEA concentration, indicating that these sensors were more sensitive to TEA compared to the pure ZnSnO3 sensor. For the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor, the response values at 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 μL·L-1 of TEA were 3.1, 4.2, 10.7, 28.8, 70.6, and 104.6, respectively. It is evident that the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor demonstrated higher response values than both the ZnSnO3/NiO-1 and ZnSnO3/NiO-3 sensors, regardless of whether the TEA concentration was low or high. Fig. 8b illustrates the correlation between the response and the concentration of TEA for sensors based on pure ZnSnO3 as well as those incorporating ZnSnO3/NiO. The response values for all sensors rose as the concentration of TEA was elevated. Additionally, the response values of the three ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to TEA were uniformly greater than those observed in the pure ZnSnO3 sensor, with the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor exhibiting the highest response values. This suggests that the addition of NiO greatly improves gas response values, with an ideal molar ratio of Ni to Zn at 1∶2.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  (a) Response curves of pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 5-200 μL·L-1 TEA at 220 ℃; (b) Relationship between the response value and TEA concentration for pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors; (c-e) Response/recovery curves of ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 100 μL·L-1 TEA at 220 ℃; (f) Repeatability of ZnSnO3/NiO-2 based sensor

    Fig. 8c-8e illustrate the response and recovery curves of ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors when exposed to 100 μL·L-1 TEA at 220 ℃. The response and recovery times for the ZnSnO3/NiO-1, ZnSnO3/NiO-2, and ZnSnO3/NiO-3 sensors were 1 s/31 s, 1 s/18 s and 1 s/23 s, respectively. Fig. 8f illustrates the repeatability of the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor. The results indicate that both the response values and the rate of response/recovery for the sensor remained consistently stable, suggesting that the sensor exhibited dependable repeatability. The long-term stability of the ZnSnO3/NiO-2-based sensor is presented in Fig.S4. Over the 30-day testing period, the sensor response values showed minimal variation, demonstrating its excellent long-term stability.

    Furthermore, the gas sensing properties of the ZnSnO3/NiO-2-based sensor were compared with TEA sensors reported in the literature, as summarized in Table 1[19, 37-44]. The sensor composed of ZnSnO3 and NiO exhibited elevated response values and swift response and recovery rates when exposed to TEA gas, highlighting the potential of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures as promising sensitive materials.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Comparison of TEA sensing performance of different gas sensors*
    下载: 导出CSV
    Material Tow / ℃ Con. / (μL·L-1) Res. (Ra/Rg) tres / s trec / s Ref.
    SnO2/Zn2SnO4 spheres 250 100 48.2 2 184 [19]
    ZnSnO3/ZnO heterostructures 160 50 101 32 41 [37]
    Polyhedral Zn2SnO4 200 100 37 2 17 [38]
    Co-doped SnO2 300 100 40.1 [39]
    ZnO rods 280 50 60 11 40 [40]
    Hollow SnO2 microfiber 270 100 49.5 14 12 [41]
    Porous ZnSnO3 nanocubes 350 100 57.5 4 1 040 [42]
    ZnSnO3/Zn2SnO4 190 100 179.7 19 37 [43]
    V2O5 hollow sphere 370 100 7.3 20 96 [44]
    ZnSnO3/NiO 220 100 70.6 1 18 This work
    * Tow=optimal working temperature, Con.=TEA concentration, Res.=response value.

    The mechanism by which ZnSnO3 material senses gas can be explained using the surface control model, which relates to the adsorption and desorption processes of gas molecules occurring on the surface of the material[45-46]. Upon exposure to air, oxygen species that are chemisorbed appear on the surface of the sensing material in a ZnSnO3-based sensor, leading to the generation of an electron depletion layer. This phenomenon results in a high resistance state of the sensor in the presence of air. In this study, the optimal operating temperature for the ZnSnO3-based sensor is identified as 220 ℃, at which point the predominant form of chemisorbed oxygen species is O-. When the sensor is exposed to TEA gas, the TEA molecules react with O-, releasing the adsorbed electrons into the conduction band of the material, which results in a decrease in sensor resistance (Fig. 9b). The relevant chemical reaction can be represented by the following equation:

    $ \begin{aligned} & 2\left(\mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{H}_5\right)_3 \mathrm{~N}(\mathrm{ads})+43 \mathrm{O}^{-}(\mathrm{ads}) \rightarrow \\ & ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\quad 2 \mathrm{NO}_2+12 \mathrm{CO}_2+15 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}+43 \mathrm{e}^{-} \end{aligned} $

    (8)

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  Schematic diagrams of (a) energy band and (b) sensing mechanism of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures

    ECB: conduction band energy level, EF: Fermi level, EVB: valence band energy level.

    The findings indicate that the sensing capabilities of the sensor based on ZnSnO3/NiO exceed those of the standalone ZnSnO3 sensor, attributable to several factors. Initially, since NiO serves as a characteristic p-type semiconductor, the binding of NiO nanosheets to the outer surface of ZnSnO3 hollow cubes promotes the movement of electrons from ZnSnO3 to NiO. Simultaneously, holes shift in the reverse direction until the Fermi level of the system attains equilibrium, leading to the creation of a contact barrier at the interface of ZnSnO3 and NiO, which in turn creates an internal electric field. Consequently, an electron depletion layer forms at the interface adjacent to the ZnSnO3 material, while a hole depletion layer develops at the interface near the NiO material, leading to an increase in the resistance of the ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensor in air (Fig. 9a). When the ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensor is subjected to TEA, it undergoes an electron release, which leads to a reduction in the thickness of depletion layers and a subsequent lowering of the height of the potential barrier. Additionally, the equation can express the connection between the resistance value of heterostructures (R) and the barrier height (Φ): RBexp[/(kT)], where B is a constant related to ambient temperature, q represents the electronic charge, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T denotes the absolute temperature[47]. This equation indicates that even a slight alteration in the barrier height can significantly influence the sensor resistance. Therefore, the response values of the sensor can be substantially enhanced by constructing ZnSnO3/NiO p-n heterostructures.

    Additionally, NiO demonstrates significant catalytic properties, enhancing the uptake of oxygen molecules on the surface of the material. The formation of an increased quantity of chemisorbed oxygen species occurs as a result of this process, significantly improving the surface interaction between adsorbed oxygen ions and TEA molecules[48]. Moreover, XPS analysis reveals that the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 material contains a greater proportion of oxygen vacancies compared to pure ZnSnO3, leading to the production of additional oxygen species on the surface of the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 material, which aids in enhancing sensor performance[49-50]. However, an excessive attachment of NiO nanosheets to the surface of ZnSnO3 can significantly reduce the sensor′s response values, likely due to the excessive NiO covering the active sites on the material′s surface[51]. The development of a hollow structure additionally creates numerous active sites on the surface of the sensitive material, allowing gas molecules to traverse this configuration rapidly, thereby enhancing responsiveness and shortening the response/recovery time of the sensors[16-17].

    In this study, pure ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures were synthesized, characterized, and employed in the preparation of a TEA sensor. The purity, morphology, crystallographic properties, and surface chemical composition of the obtained ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructure sensors were analyzed using PXRD, FESEM, TEM, element mapping, EDS, and XPS. The findings suggest that an optimal sensor performance was achieved with a molar ratio of Ni to Zn at 1∶2. The response values of the ZnSnO3/NiO-2 sensor were measured at 70.6 for 100 μL·L-1 TEA gas at 220 ℃, which were 6.1 times greater than that of the pure ZnSnO3-based sensors. Furthermore, the sensor showed short response/recovery times (1 s/18 s), strong repeatability, and sustained stability over time. The enhancement in the sensing performance is ascribed to the formation of a hollow architecture along with the ZnSnO3/NiO p-n heterostructures. In addition, the outcomes of these experiments establish a theoretical basis for additional investigations into sensing materials that incorporate p-n heterostructures, indicating that the unique ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructure sensors are promising candidates for efficient and reliable detection of TEA.

    Supporting information is available at http://www.wjhxxb.cn


    1. [1]

      LI W R, XU H Y, ZHAI T, YU H Q, CHEN Z R, QIU Z W, SONG X P, WANG J Q, CAO B Q. Enhanced triethylamine sensing properties by designing Au@SnO2/MoS2 nanostructure directly on alumina tubes[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2017, 253:  97-107.

    2. [2]

      LI S R, GUAN M Y, LI X Z, GUO Y. Light irradiation enhanced triethylamine gas sensing materials based on ZnO/ZnFe2O4composites[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2016, 236:  350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.130

    3. [3]

      CAI T M, CHEN L W, REN Q, CAI S, ZHANG J. The biodegradation pathway of triethylamine and its biodegradation by immobilized Arthrobacter protophormiae cells[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 186(1):  59-66.

    4. [4]

      JU D X, XU H Y, QIU Z W, GUO J, ZHANG J, CAO B Q. Highly sensitive and selective triethylamine-sensing properties of nanosheets directly grown on ceramic tube by forming NiO/ZnO PN heterojunction[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2014, 200:  288-296.

    5. [5]

      SUN H M, LIU L. Metal-organic frameworks-derived 2D spindle-like Sn doped Co3O4 porous nanosheets as efficient materials for TEA detection[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2021, 338:  129825. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129825

    6. [6]

      王春水, 白玉莹, 刘醒醒, 李佳豪, 储向峰, 梁士明. WS2/CuGa2O4复合材料的制备及其气敏性[J]. 无机化学学报, 2023,39,(8): 1519-1526. WANG C S, BAI Y Y, LIU X X, LI J H, CHU X F, LIANG S M. Preparation and gas-sensing properties of WS2/CuGa2O4 composite materials[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2023, 39(8):  1519-1526.

    7. [7]

      卜鑫, 鲍思洁, 储向峰, 梁士明, 王春水, 白玉莹. MoS2/Cd2SnO4复合材料的制备及其气敏性能[J]. 无机化学学报, 2022,38,(11): 2173-2180. BU X, BAO S J, CHU X F, LIANG S M, WANG C S, BAI Y Y. Preparation and gas-sensing properties of MoS2/Cd2SnO4 composite materials[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 38(11):  2173-2180.

    8. [8]

      陈沭璇, 贾丽华, 郭祥峰, 赵振龙, 杨瑞, 王欣. MOFs自牺牲模板法制备ZnO及其对NO2的气敏性能[J]. 无机化学学报, 2020,36,(9): 1639-1648. CHEN S X, JIA L H, GUO X F, ZHAO Z L, YANG R, WANG X. MOFs self-sacrifice template preparation and NO2 gas sensing performance of ZnO[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2020, 36(9):  1639-1648.

    9. [9]

      LEE K Y, HSIEH J C, CHEN C A, CHEN W L, MENG H F, LU C J, HORNG S F, ZAN H W. Ultrasensitive detection of hydrogen sulfide gas based on perovskite vertical channel chemosensor[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2021, 326:  128988. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128988

    10. [10]

      SHELLAIAH M, SUN K W. Review on sensing applications of perovskite nanomaterials[J]. Chemosensors, 2020, 8(3):  55. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors8030055

    11. [11]

      CASANOVA-CHAFER J, GARCIA-ABOAL R, ATIENZAR P, LLOBET E. The role of anions and cations in the gas sensing mechanisms of graphene decorated with lead halide perovskite nanocrystals[J]. Chem. Commun., 2020, 56(63):  8956-8959.

    12. [12]

      DU L Y, WANG D X, GU K K, ZHANG M Z. Construction of PdOdecorated double-shell ZnSnO3 hollow microspheres for n-propanol detection at low temperature[J]. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2021, 8(3):  787-795.

    13. [13]

      FENG G Q, CHE Y H, SONG C W, XIAO J K, FAN X F, SUN S, HUANG G H, MA Y C. Morphology-controlled synthesis of ZnSnO3 hollow spheres and their n butanol gas sensing performance[J]. Ceram. Int., 2021, 47(2):  2471-2482.

    14. [14]

      WANG X Y, DING B N, LIU Y P, ZHU X T, LI H, XIA M Z, FU H, LI M X. Synthesis of 3D flower like ZnSnO3 and improvement of ethanol-sensing properties at room temperature based on nano-TiO2 decoration and UV radiation[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2018, 264:  119-127.

    15. [15]

      ZENG Y, ZHANG K, WANG X L, SUI Y M, ZOU B, ZHENG W T, ZOU G T. Rapid and selective H2S detection of hierarchical ZnSnO3 nanocages[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2011, 159(1):  245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.06.080

    16. [16]

      WANG J Y, WAN J W, WANG D. Hollow multishelled structures for promising applications: Understanding the structure-performance correlation[J]. Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52(8):  2169-2178. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00112

    17. [17]

      SUI Y M, ZENG Y, ZHENG W T, LIU B B, ZOU B, YANG H B. Synthesis of polyhedron hollow structure Cu2O and their gas-sensing properties[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2012, 171:  135-140.

    18. [18]

      SUN H M, TANG X N, YAO Y, LIU L. Metal-organic frameworksderived Al/Mo codoped porous Co3O4 hollow tetrahedrons for efficient triethylamine detection[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2023, 968:  171725. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171725

    19. [19]

      YANG X L, YU Q, ZHANG S F, SUN P, LU H Y, YAN X, LIU F M, ZHOU X, LIANG X S, GAO Y, LU G Y. Highly sensitive and selective triethylamine gas sensor based on porous SnO2/Zn2SnO4 composites[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2018, 266:  213-220. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.044

    20. [20]

      YU S W, JIA X H, YANG J, WANG S Z, LI Y, SONG H J. Highly sensitive ethanol gas sensor based on CuO/ZnSnO3 heterojunction composites[J]. Mater. Lett., 2021, 291:  129531. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129531

    21. [21]

      JIN C, KIM H, AN S, LEE C. Highly sensitive H2S gas sensors based on CuO-coated ZnSnO 3 nanorods synthesized by thermal evaporation[J]. Ceram. Int., 2012, 38(7):  5973-5978. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.050

    22. [22]

      XU K, ZHAO W, YU X, DUAN S L, ZENG W. Enhanced ethanol sensing performance using Co3O4-ZnSnO3 arrays prepared on alumina substrates[J]. Physica E, 2020, 117:  113825. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2019.113825

    23. [23]

      YANG M, LU J Y, WANG X, ZHANG H, CHEN F, SUN J B, YANG J Q, SUN Y F, LU G Y. Acetone sensors with high stability to humidity changes based on Ru doped NiO flower like microspheres[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2020, 313:  127965. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127965

    24. [24]

      ULLAH M, LV H, LIU Z, BAI X, CHEN J K, ZHANG Y, WANG J, SUN B H, LI L, SHI K Y. Rational fabrication of a g-C3N4/NiO hierarchical nanocomposite with a large surface area for the effective detection of NO2 gas at room temperature[J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 550:  149368. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149368

    25. [25]

      ZHOU T T, ZHANG T, ZHANG R, LOU Z, DENG J N, WANG L L. Hollow ZnSnO3 cubes with controllable shells enabling highly efficient chemical sensing detection of formaldehyde vapors[J]. ACS. Appl. Mater., 2017, 9:  14525-14533. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03112

    26. [26]

      HUANG J R, XU X J, GU C P, WANG W Z, GENG B Y, SUN Y F, LIU J H. Size-controlled synthesis of porous ZnSnO3 cubes and their gas sensing and photocatalysis properties[J]. Sens. Actuator B - Chem., 2012, 171-172:  572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.05.036

    27. [27]

      DU L Y, GU K K, ZHU M M, ZHANG J, ZHANG M Z. Perovskitetype ZnSn (OH)6 hollow cubes with controllable shells for enhanced formaldehyde sensing performance at low temperature[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2019, 288:  298-306.

    28. [28]

      YANG T Y, GU K K, ZHU M M, LU Q, ZHAI C B, ZHAO Q, YANG X D, ZHANG M Z. ZnO SnO2 heterojunction nanobelts: Synthesis and ultraviolet light irradiation to improve the triethylamine sensing properties[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2019, 279:  410-417.

    29. [29]

      WANG H, YUAN X Z, WU Y, ZENG G M, TU W G, SHENG C, DENG Y C, CHEN F, CHEW J W. Plasmonic Bi nanoparticles and BiOCl sheets as cocatalyst deposited on perovskite-type ZnSn (OH)6 microparticle with facet oriented polyhedron for improved visible light driven photocatalysis[J]. Appl. Catal. B - Environ., 2017, 209:  543-553.

    30. [30]

      WANG Y D, CHEN T. Nonaqueous and template-free synthesis of Sb doped SnO2 microspheres and their application to lithium-ion battery anode[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54(13):  3510-3515.

    31. [31]

      MENG D, LIU D Y, WANG G S, SHEN Y B, SAN X G, LI M, MENG F L. Low temperature formaldehyde gas sensors based on NiOSnO2 heterojunction microflowers assembled by thin porous nanosheets[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2018, 273:  418-428.

    32. [32]

      BAI S L, TIAN Y, ZHAO Y H, FU H, TANG P G, LUO R X, LI D Q, CHEN A F, LIU C C. Construction of NiO@ZnSnO3 hierarchical microspheres decorated with NiO nanosheets for formaldehyde sensing[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2018, 259:  908-916.

    33. [33]

      MA Y T, XIE Q S, LIU X, ZHAO Y C, ZENG D Q, WANG L S, ZHENG Y, PENG D L. Synthesis of amorphous ZnSnO3 double-shell hollow microcubes as advanced anode materials for lithium ion batteries[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 182:  327-333.

    34. [34]

      WANG L L, TANG K B, LIU Z P, WANG D K, SHENG J, CHENG W. Single crystalline ZnSn (OH)6 hollow cubes via self templated synthesis at room temperature and their photocatalytic properties[J]. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21(12):  4352-4357.

    35. [35]

      BAI S L, CHEN C, LUO R X, CHEN A F, LI D Q. Synthesis of MoO3/reduced graphene oxide hybrids and mechanism of enhancing H2S sensing performances[J]. Sens. Actuator B - Chem., 2015, 216:  113-120.

    36. [36]

      BAI S L, TIAN K, TIAN Y, GUO J, FENG Y J, LUO R X, LI D Q, CHEN A F, LIU C C. Synthesis of Co3O4/TiO2 composite by pyrolyzing ZIF-67 for detection of xylene[J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 435:  384-392.

    37. [37]

      YAN Y, LIU J Y, ZHANG H S, SONG D L, LI J Q, YANG P P, ZHANG M L, WANG J. One-pot synthesis of cubic ZnSnO3/ZnO heterostructure composite and enhanced gas-sensing performance[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2019, 780:  193-201.

    38. [38]

      ZHAO Q Q, JU D X, SONG X F, DENG X L, DING M, XU X J, ZENG H B. Polyhedral Zn2SnO4: Synthesis, enhanced gas sensing and photocatalytic performance[J]. Sens. Actuator B - Chem., 2016, 229:  627-634.

    39. [39]

      KOU X Y, WANG C, DING M D, FENG C H, LI X, MA J, ZHANG H, SUN Y F, LU G Y. Synthesis of Co-doped SnO2 nanofibers and their enhanced gas-sensing properties[J]. Sens. Actuator B -Chem., 2016, 236:  425-432.

    40. [40]

      LI W R, XU H Y, YU H Q, ZHAI T, XU Q, YANG X P, WANG J Q, CAO B Q. Different morphologies of ZnO and their triethylamine sensing properties[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2017, 706:  461-469.

    41. [41]

      ZOU Y H, CHEN S, SUN J, LIU J Q, CHE Y K, LIU X H, ZHANG J, YANG D J. Highly efficient gas sensor using a hollow SnO2 microfiber for triethylamine detection[J]. ACS Sens., 2017, 2(7):  897-902.

    42. [42]

      SA B S, ZITO C A, PERFECTO T M, VOLANTI D P. Porous ZnSnO3 nanocubes as a triethylamine sensor[J]. Sens. Actuator B - Chem., 2021, 338:  129869.

    43. [43]

      LI Z D, XIONG Y, BI D Q, LIU Q, YANG C Y, ZHANG J. Continuously improved gas-sensing performance of Zn2SnO4 porous octahedrons by structure evolution and further ZnSnO3 nanosheets decoration[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2022, 901:  163744.

    44. [44]

      WU M Z, ZHANG X F, GAO S, CHENG X L, RONG Z M, XU Y M, ZHAO H, HUO L H. Construction of monodisperse vanadium pentoxide hollow spheres via a facile route and triethylamine sensing property[J]. CrystEngComm, 2013, 15(46):  10123-10131.

    45. [45]

      HOA N D, EL-SAFTY S A. Highly sensitive and selective volatile organic compound gas sensors based on mesoporous nanocomposite monoliths[J]. Anal. Methods, 2011, 3(9):  1948-1956.

    46. [46]

      YAMAZOE N, SAKAI G, SHIMANOE K. Oxide semiconductor gas sensors[J]. Catal. Surv. Asia, 2003, 7:  63-75.

    47. [47]

      LIU C, WANG B Q, LIU T, SUN P, GAO Y, LIU F M, LU G Y. Facile synthesis and gas sensing properties of the flower-like NiO-decorated ZnO microstructures[J]. Sens. Actuator B - Chem., 2016, 235:  294-301.

    48. [48]

      GENG W C, MA Z Y, ZHAO Y J, YANG J H, HE X W, DUAN L B, LI F, HOU H, ZHANG Q Y. Morphology dependent gas sensing properties of CuO microstructures selfassembled from nanorods[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2020, 325:  128775.

    49. [49]

      WU J J, HUANG Q W, ZENG D W, ZHANG S P, YANG L, XIA D S, XIONG Z D, XIE C S. Al-doping induced formation of oxygen-vacancy for enhancing gas-sensing properties of SnO2 NTs by electrospinning[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2014, 198:  62-69.

    50. [50]

      QIN Y X, YE Z H. DFT study on interaction of NO2 with the vacancydefected WO 3 nanowires for gas-sensing[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2016, 222:  499-507.

    51. [51]

      JAIN K, PANT R P, LAKSHMIKUMAR S T. Effect of Ni doping on thick film SnO2 gsensor[J]. Sens. Actuator B-Chem., 2006, 113:  823-829.

  • Figure 1  PXRD pattern of ZnSnO3 and ZnSnO3/NiO composites

    Figure 2  FESEM images: (a, e) pure ZnSnO3, (b, f) ZnSnO3/NiO-1, (c, g) ZnSnO3/NiO-2, and (d, h) ZnSnO3/NiO-3

    Figure 3  Elemental mappings of ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    Figure 4  (a, b) TEM, (c) SAED, and (d) HRTEM images of ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    Figure 5  XPS analysis: (a) survey, (b) Zn2p, (c) Sn3d, and (d) Ni2p spectra of ZnSnO3/NiO-2; O1s spectra of (e) pure ZnSnO3 and (f) ZnSnO3/NiO-2

    Figure 6  Detailed formation of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures

    Figure 7  (a) Response values of pure ZnSnO3-, NiO-, and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 100 μL·L-1 TEA at different operating temperatures; (b) Gas selectivity of pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors at 220 ℃

    Figure 8  (a) Response curves of pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 5-200 μL·L-1 TEA at 220 ℃; (b) Relationship between the response value and TEA concentration for pure ZnSnO3- and ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors; (c-e) Response/recovery curves of ZnSnO3/NiO-based sensors to 100 μL·L-1 TEA at 220 ℃; (f) Repeatability of ZnSnO3/NiO-2 based sensor

    Figure 9  Schematic diagrams of (a) energy band and (b) sensing mechanism of ZnSnO3/NiO heterostructures

    ECB: conduction band energy level, EF: Fermi level, EVB: valence band energy level.

    Table 1.  Comparison of TEA sensing performance of different gas sensors*

    Material Tow / ℃ Con. / (μL·L-1) Res. (Ra/Rg) tres / s trec / s Ref.
    SnO2/Zn2SnO4 spheres 250 100 48.2 2 184 [19]
    ZnSnO3/ZnO heterostructures 160 50 101 32 41 [37]
    Polyhedral Zn2SnO4 200 100 37 2 17 [38]
    Co-doped SnO2 300 100 40.1 [39]
    ZnO rods 280 50 60 11 40 [40]
    Hollow SnO2 microfiber 270 100 49.5 14 12 [41]
    Porous ZnSnO3 nanocubes 350 100 57.5 4 1 040 [42]
    ZnSnO3/Zn2SnO4 190 100 179.7 19 37 [43]
    V2O5 hollow sphere 370 100 7.3 20 96 [44]
    ZnSnO3/NiO 220 100 70.6 1 18 This work
    * Tow=optimal working temperature, Con.=TEA concentration, Res.=response value.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2025-04-10
  • 收稿日期:  2024-11-12
  • 修回日期:  2025-02-24
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章