Citation: Zhiqiang Wang, Yajie Gao, Tianjun Wang, Wei Chen, Zefeng Ren, Xueming Yang, Chuanyao Zhou. Photocatalyzed oxidation of water on oxygen pretreated rutile TiO₂(110)[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, ;2025, 36(4): 110602. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110602 shu

Photocatalyzed oxidation of water on oxygen pretreated rutile TiO₂(110)

Zhiqiang Wang ^{a, 1} ,
Yajie Gao ^{b, d, 1} ,
Tianjun Wang ^b ,
Wei Chen ^b ,
Zefeng Ren ^b ,
Xueming Yang ^{b, c} ,
Chuanyao Zhou ^{b, d, *,}

a.
School of Physics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China
b.
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
c.
Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
d.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

chuanyaozhou@dicp.ac.cn

Received Date: 22 July 2024
Revised Date: 29 October 2024
Accepted Date: 31 October 2024
Available Online: 3 November 2024

Figures(4)

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is the bottleneck in the overall photocatalytic splitting of water. The active sites (terminal titanium or bridging oxygen) and active species (molecular or dissociative water) of the initial step of the photocatalyzed OER on the prototypical photocatalyst TiO₂, remain debatable. Herein, the photocatalytic chemistry of monolayer water on oxygen-pretreated TiO₂(110) (o-TiO₂(110)) and reduced TiO₂(110) (r-TiO₂(110)) surfaces initiated by 400 nm light illumination was investigated by time-dependent two-photon photoemission spectroscopy (TD-2PPE). The photoinduced reduction of the H₂O/o-TiO₂(110) interface rather than the H₂O/r-TiO₂(110) interface was detected by TD-2PPE. The difference in 2PPE originated from the presence of the terminal hydroxyl anions (OH_t¯) on H₂O/o-TiO₂(110), as identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and temperature-programmed desorption. Therefore, the evolution of the electronic structure of H₂O/o-TiO₂(110) was attributed to the photocatalyzed oxidation of the terminal hydroxyl anions, which most likely formed gaseous ^•OH radicals, reducing the interface. This work suggested that the oxidation of hydroxyl anions on top of the terminal titanium ions on TiO₂, which were excluded previously in solution, need to be considered in the mechanistic studies of the photocatalyzed OER.
- Photocatalyzed oxidation of water,
- TiO₂,
- Terminal hydroxyl anions,
- ^•OH radicals,
- Interfacial charge transfer
1. [1]
  A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 238 (1972) 37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0
2. [2]
  X.B. Chen, S.H. Shen, L.J. Guo, et al., Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6503–6570. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645
3. [3]
  A.L. Linsebigler, G.Q. Lu, J.T. Yates, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 735–758. doi: 10.1021/cr00035a013
4. [4]
  E.D. Fakhrutdinova, O.A. Reutova, T.A. Bugrova, et al., Trans. Tianjin Univ. 30 (2024) 198–209. doi: 10.1007/s12209-024-00388-z
5. [5]
  W. Navarra, I. Ritacco, O. Sacco, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 126 (2022) 7000–7011. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00152
6. [6]
  S. Du, J. Lian, F. Zhang, Trans. Tianjin Univ. 28 (2022) 33–52. doi: 10.1007/s12209-021-00303-w
7. [7]
  M. Zhou, H.F. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 4705–4709. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.074
8. [8]
  Y. Jiang, Y. Qin, T. Yu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1823–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.010
9. [9]
  Z. Wu, F. Xiong, Z. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 752–756. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.01.019
10. [10]
  Y. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Jia, et al., Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 9987–10043. doi: 10.1021/cr500008u
11. [11]
  R. Nakamura, Y. Nakato, Solid State Phenomena 162 (2010) 1–27. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.162.1
12. [12]
  P. Salvador, Prog. Surf. Sci. 86 (2011) 41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.progsurf.2010.10.002
13. [13]
  A. Imanishi, T. Okamura, N. Ohashi, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 11569–11578. doi: 10.1021/ja073206+
14. [14]
  R. Nakamura, Y. Nakato, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 1290–1298. doi: 10.1021/ja0388764
15. [15]
  Q. Guo, C. Zhou, Z. Ma, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 3701–3730. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00448A
16. [16]
  P. Salvador, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 17038–17043. doi: 10.1021/jp074451i
17. [17]
  Y. Nosaka, A. Nosaka, ACS Energy Lett. 1 (2016) 356–359. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00174
18. [18]
  Y. Nosaka, A.Y. Nosaka, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 11302–11336. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161
19. [19]
  S. Tan, H. Feng, Y. Ji, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 9978–9985. doi: 10.1021/ja211919k
20. [20]
  W. Yang, D. Wei, X. Jin, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (2016) 603–608. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00015
21. [21]
  C. Xu, F. Xu, X. Chen, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 (2021) 1066–1072. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03726
22. [22]
  Z. Geng, X. Chen, W. Yang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 120 (2016) 26807–26813. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07774
23. [23]
  A. Migani, L. Blancafort, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 11845–11856. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05121
24. [24]
  D. Wang, T. Sheng, J. Chen, et al., Nat. Catal. 1 (2018) 291–299. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0055-z
25. [25]
  U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. Rep. 48 (2003) 53–229. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0
26. [26]
  L.E. Walle, A. Borg, P. Uvdal, et al., Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 235436. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.235436
27. [27]
  M.A. Henderson, Surf. Sci. 355 (1996) 151–166. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)01357-1
28. [28]
  M.A. Henderson, W.S. Epling, C.H.F. Peden, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 534–545. doi: 10.1021/jp0262113
29. [29]
  R.T. Zehr, M.A. Henderson, Surf. Sci. 602 (2008) 1507–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.02.031
30. [30]
  M. Li, W. Hebenstreit, L. Gross, et al., Surf. Sci. 437 (1999) 173–190. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00720-7
31. [31]
  E. Lira, J.O. Hansen, P. Huo, et al., Surf. Sci. 604 (2010) 1945–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.08.004
32. [32]
  Y. Du, N.A. Deskins, Z. Zhang, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 096102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096102
33. [33]
  W.S. Epling, C.H.F. Peden, M.A. Henderson, et al., Surf. Sci. 413 (1998) 333–343.
34. [34]
  Z. Zhang, Y. Du, N.G. Petrik, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 1908–1916. doi: 10.1021/jp809001x
35. [35]
  C. Kamal, N. Stenberg, L.E. Walle, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 016102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.016102
36. [36]
  M. Amft, L.E. Walle, D. Ragazzon, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 17078–17083. doi: 10.1021/jp405208x
37. [37]
  C.Y. Zhou, Z.B. Ma, Z.F. Ren, et al., Energ. Environ. Sci. 5 (2012) 6833–6844. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21493h
38. [38]
  K. Onda, B. Li, H. Petek, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 045415. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.045415
39. [39]
  K. Onda, B. Li, J. Zhao, et al., Science 308 (2005) 1154–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.1109366
40. [40]
  C.M. Yim, C.L. Pang, G. Thornton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 036806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.036806
41. [41]
  X.C. Mao, X.F. Lang, Z.Q. Wang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 (2013) 3839–3844. doi: 10.1021/jz402053p
42. [42]
  Z. Wang, B. Wen, Q. Hao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 9146–9152. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04483
43. [43]
  J. Li, T. Wang, S. Xia, et al., JACS Au 4 (2024) 491–501. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00600
44. [44]
  V. Henrich, G. Dresselhaus, H. Zeiger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1335–1339. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1335
45. [45]
  S. Wendt, P.T. Sprunger, E. Lira, et al., Science 320 (2008) 1755–1759. doi: 10.1126/science.1159846
46. [46]
  T.L. Thompson, J.T. Yates Jr., J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 18230–18236. doi: 10.1021/jp0530451
47. [47]
  C.B. Xu, W.S. Yang, Q. Guo, et al., Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 26 (2013) 646–650. doi: 10.1063/1674-0068/26/06/646-650
48. [48]
  Y. Du, N.A. Deskins, Z. Zhang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010) 17080–17084. doi: 10.1021/jp1036876
49. [49]
  J. Cheng, J. VandeVondele, M. Sprik, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 5437–5444.
50. [50]
  D. Wang, H. Wang, P. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 1549–1555. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04159C
51. [51]
  S. Dong, J. Hu, S. Xia, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 2620–2630. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03930
52. [52]
  M. Shen, M.A. Henderson, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 (2011) 2707–2710. doi: 10.1021/jz201242k
53. [53]
  Z.T. Wang, N. Aaron Deskins, I. Lyubinetsky, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 (2012) 102–106. doi: 10.1021/jz2014055
54. [54]
  C.D. Jaeger, A.J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) 3146–3152. doi: 10.1021/j100487a017
55. [55]
  M. Anpo, T. Shima, Y. Kubokawa, Chem. Lett. 14 (1985) 1799–1802. doi: 10.1246/cl.1985.1799
56. [56]
  R.F. Howe, M. Gratzel, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 3906–3909. doi: 10.1021/j100298a035
57. [57]
  O.I. Micic, Y. Zhang, K.R. Cromack, et al., J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 7277–7283. doi: 10.1021/j100130a026
58. [58]
  P.F. Schwarz, N.J. Turro, S.H. Bossmann, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 7127–7134. doi: 10.1021/jp971315c
59. [59]
  Y. Nosaka, S. Komori, K. Yawata, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5 (2003) 4731–4735. doi: 10.1039/B307433A
60. [60]
  H. Zhou, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 7650–7655. doi: 10.1039/D1TA00532D
61. [61]
  I.M. Brookes, C.A. Muryn, G. Thornton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 266103–266106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.266103
62. [62]
  Z.T. Wang, Y.G. Wang, R. Mu, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114 (2017) 1801–1805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613756114
63. [63]
  S. Tan, H. Feng, Q. Zheng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 826–834. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09132
64. [64]
  K. Sebbari, C. Domain, J. Roques, et al., Surf. Sci. 605 (2011) 1275–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.04.015
65. [65]
  S. Wendt, J. Matthiesen, R. Schaub, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 066107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.066107
66. [66]
  P.J.D. Lindan, C.J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 075439. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.075439
67. [67]
  L.A. Harris, A.A. Quong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 086105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.086105
68. [68]
  X. Meng, J. Guo, J. Peng, et al., Nat. Phys. 11 (2015) 235–239. doi: 10.1038/nphys3225
69. [69]
  R. Feng, A. Liu, S. Liu, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 9798–9804. doi: 10.1021/jp512798f
70. [70]
  A. Mills, R.H. Davies, D. Worsley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22 (1993) 417–425. doi: 10.1039/cs9932200417
71. [71]
  Y. Murakami, E. Kenji, A.Y. Nosaka, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 16808–16811. doi: 10.1021/jp063293c
72. [72]
  Y. Murakami, K. Endo, I. Ohta, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 11339–11346. doi: 10.1021/jp0722049
73. [73]
  J. Thiebaud, F. Thévenet, C. Fittschen, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010) 3082–3088. doi: 10.1021/jp9102542
74. [74]
  J. Zhang, Y. Nosaka, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 10824–10832. doi: 10.1021/jp501214m
75. [75]
  M.R. Hoffmann, S.T. Martin, W.Y. Choi, et al., Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 69–96. doi: 10.1021/cr00033a004
76. [76]
  B.H.J. Bielski, D.E. Cabelli, R.L. Arudi, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14 (1985) 1041–1100. doi: 10.1063/1.555739
77. [77]
  Z.H. Loh, G. Doumy, C. Arnold, et al., Science 367 (2020) 179–182. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz4740
78. [78]
  W. Kim, T. Tachikawa, G.H. Moon, et al., Angew. Chem. 126 (2014) 14260–14265. doi: 10.1002/ange.201406625
79. [79]
  G.H. Ren, M. Zhou, P.J. Hu, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 2346. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46749-z
80. [80]
  R.L. Kurtz, R. Stock-Bauer, T.E. Msdey, et al., Surf. Sci. 218 (1989) 178–200. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90626-2
1. [1]
  Maosen Xu , Pengfei Zhu , Qinghong Cai , Meichun Bu , Chenghua Zhang , Hong Wu , Youzhou He , Min Fu , Siqi Li , Xingyan Liu . In-situ fabrication of TiO₂/NH₂−MIL-125(Ti) via MOF-driven strategy to promote efficient interfacial effects for enhancing photocatalytic NO removal activity. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109524-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109524
2. [2]
  Xiaoyao YIN , Wenhao ZHU , Puyao SHI , Zongsheng LI , Yichao WANG , Nengmin ZHU , Yang WANG , Weihai SUN . Fabrication of all-inorganic CsPbBr₃ perovskite solar cells with SnCl₂ interface modification. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(3): 469-479. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240309
3. [3]
  Hongye Bai , Lihao Yu , Jinfu Xu , Xuliang Pang , Yajie Bai , Jianguo Cui , Weiqiang Fan . Controllable Decoration of Ni-MOF on TiO2: Understanding the Role of Coordination State on Photoelectrochemical Performance. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(10): 100096-100096. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100096
4. [4]
  Jiatong Li , Linlin Zhang , Peng Huang , Chengjun Ge . Carbon bridge effects regulate TiO₂–acrylate fluoroboron coatings for efficient marine antifouling. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109970-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109970
5. [5]
  Cailiang Yue , Nan Sun , Yixing Qiu , Linlin Zhu , Zhiling Du , Fuqiang Liu . A direct Z-scheme 0D α-Fe₂O₃/TiO₂ heterojunction for enhanced photo-Fenton activity with low H₂O₂ consumption. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109698-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109698
6. [6]
  Bing LIU , Huang ZHANG , Hongliang HAN , Changwen HU , Yinglei ZHANG . Visible light degradation of methylene blue from water by triangle Au@TiO₂ mesoporous catalyst. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(5): 941-952. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230398
7. [7]
  Xing Xiao , Yunling Jia , Wanyu Hong , Yuqing He , Yanjun Wang , Lizhi Zhao , Huiqin An , Zhen Yin . Sulfur-defective ZnIn2S4 nanosheets decorated by TiO2 nanosheets with exposed {001} facets to accelerate charge transfer for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(12): 100474-100474. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100474
8. [8]
  Ying Hou , Zhen Liu , Xiaoyan Liu , Zhiwei Sun , Zenan Wang , Hong Liu , Weijia Zhou . Laser constructed vacancy-rich TiO_2-x/Ti microfiber via enhanced interfacial charge transfer for operando extraction-SERS sensing. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109634-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109634
9. [9]
  Yuan Teng , Zichun Zhou , Jinghua Chen , Siying Huang , Hongyan Chen , Daibin Kuang . Dual atom-bridge effect promoting interfacial charge transfer in 2D/2D Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/BiOBr epitaxial heterojunction for efficient photocatalysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 110430-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110430
10. [10]
  Huizhong Wu , Ruiheng Liang , Ge Song , Zhongzheng Hu , Xuyang Zhang , Minghua Zhou . Enhanced interfacial charge transfer on Bi metal@defective Bi₂Sn₂O₇ quantum dots towards improved full-spectrum photocatalysis: A combined experimental and theoretical investigation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 109131-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109131
11. [11]
  Xin Jiang , Han Jiang , Yimin Tang , Huizhu Zhang , Libin Yang , Xiuwen Wang , Bing Zhao . g-C₃N₄/TiO_2-X heterojunction with high-efficiency carrier separation and multiple charge transfer paths for ultrasensitive SERS sensing. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109415-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109415
12. [12]
  Lu Dai , Yuxin Ren , Shuang Li , Meidi Wang , Chentao Hu , Ya-Pan Wu , Guangtong Hai , Dong-Sheng Li . Room-temperature synthesis of Co(OH)₂/Mo₂TiC₂T_x hetero-nanosheets with interfacial coupling for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 109774-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109774
13. [13]
  Fanxin Kong , Hongzhi Wang , Huimei Duan . Inhibition effect of sulfation on Pt/TiO2 catalysts in methane combustion. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(5): 100287-100287. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100287
14. [14]
  Kai Han , Guohui Dong , Ishaaq Saeed , Tingting Dong , Chenyang Xiao . Boosting bulk charge transport of CuWO4 photoanodes via Cs doping for solar water oxidation. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(2): 100207-100207. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100207
15. [15]
  Linlu Bai , Wensen Li , Xiaoyu Chu , Haochun Yin , Yang Qu , Ekaterina Kozlova , Zhao-Di Yang , Liqiang Jing . Effects of nanosized Au on the interface of zinc phthalocyanine/TiO₂ for CO₂ photoreduction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109931-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109931
16. [16]
  Lihua HUANG , Jian HUA . Denitration performance of HoCeMn/TiO₂ catalysts prepared by co-precipitation and impregnation methods. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(3): 629-645. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20230315
17. [17]
  Wenhao Wang , Guangpu Zhang , Qiufeng Wang , Fancang Meng , Hongbin Jia , Wei Jiang , Qingmin Ji . Hybrid nanoarchitectonics of TiO₂/aramid nanofiber membranes with softness and durability for photocatalytic dye degradation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109193-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109193
18. [18]
  Mengli Xu , Zhenmin Xu , Zhenfeng Bian . Achieving Ullmann coupling reaction via photothermal synergy with ultrafine Pd nanoclusters supported on mesoporous TiO2. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(7): 100305-100305. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100305
19. [19]
  Fei ZHOU , Xiaolin JIA . Co₃O₄/TiO₂ composite photocatalyst: Preparation and synergistic degradation performance of toluene. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(11): 2232-2240. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240236
20. [20]
  Zhuoyan Lv , Yangming Ding , Leilei Kang , Lin Li , Xiao Yan Liu , Aiqin Wang , Tao Zhang . Light-Enhanced Direct Epoxidation of Propylene by Molecular Oxygen over CuO_x/TiO₂ Catalyst. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(4): 100038-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202408015

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(1)
Abstract views(75)
HTML views(3)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Photocatalyzed oxidation of water on oxygen pretreated rutile TiO2(110)

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Photocatalyzed oxidation of water on oxygen pretreated rutile TiO₂(110)