English

• Phosphorous compounds have numerous applications in medicinal chemistry and photoluminescent materials, as well as in asymmetric transformations as ligands or organocatalysts [1-4]. Many chiral ligands with P-chirality have been extensively used in asymmetric catalysis [5-9]. Notable examples include (Rc,Sp)-Duanphos, (S,S,S,S)-BIBOP, (R,R)-QuinoxP* and (R,R)-BenzP* (Scheme 1A). Indeed, P-stereogenic organophosphorus compounds often outperform their chiral backbone substituted counterparts in the terms of coordination efficiency and enantio-control ability. As a result, numerous elegant methods have emerged for the construction of P-stereogenic compounds in recent years. These methods involve asymmetric addition of phosphorous nucleophiles to unsaturated bond [10-17], asymmetric C-P coupling [18-29], asymmetric C−H activation [30-52], asymmetric allylation [53-57], and other novel methods [58-74].

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Asymmetric addition of P-nucleophiles to alkynes.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Alkenylphosphine derivatives serve as valuable building blocks in organic synthesis that can be easily transformed to important chiral 1,2-bisphosphine derivatives through processes such as asymmetric Hayashi-Miyaura reaction [75], asymmetric conjugate hydrophosphination [76] or double asymmetric hydrogenation [77,78]. Despite their importance, general and efficient methods for the chiral preparation of alkenylphosphine derivatives are rather limited. In recent years, the catalytic asymmetric addition of phosphorous nucleophiles to alkynes has emerged as a pivotal process for constructing alkenylphosphine derivatives with P-chirality in an efficient manner. However, due to the challenging regioselectivity of phosphorous nucleophiles’ addition to alkynes and the differing reaction properties of phosphorous nucleophiles, catalytic methodology leading to diverse P-stereogenic alkenylphosphine derivatives remains rare, thereby limiting their further application.

  In 2002, Tanaka and Han developed a Pd-catalyzed addition of alkynes with (R_P)-menthyl-phenylphosphinate to give enantiomerically pure P-chiral alkenylphosphinates while retaining the configuration at phosphorus atom [79]. In 2020, our group achieved asymmetric hydrophosphorylation of alkynes using a Pd/(R,R)-QuinoxP* catalyst for the synthesis of P-stereogenic phosphinates. However, secondary phosphine oxides exhibited poor yield and enantioselectivity under the same conditions [80]. Simultaneously, Zhang utilized their Pd/Xiao-Phos to give anti-Markovnikov addition products through enantioselective hydrophosphinylation of alkynes with phosphine oxides (Scheme 1B, a) [81]. Ni-catalysis has also proven to be a highly efficient catalyst for facilitating P-H addition. In 2021, Zhang successfully applied a Ni-catalyst in the asymmetric hydrophosphination of alkynes using a one-pot two-step process, resulting in the formation of P-stereogenic phosphines [82]. More recently, Zhang also realized anti-Markovnikov hydrophosphination of unactivated alkynes through Ni^Ⅱ catalysis with the addition of AgOTf (Scheme 1B, b) [83]. Besides, the same group reported the asymmetric addition of enynes with secondary phosphine oxides to give P-chiral alkenylphosphine oxides, where the alkene moiety served as a directing group by coordinating with the Ni catalyst (Scheme 1B, c) [84]. However, no examples using phosphinate as nucleophiles were provided. Recently, our group developed a Cu/CPA co-catalytic system for delivering axially chiral phosphorus-containing alkenes (Scheme 1B, d) [85]. Additionally, Duan has successfully developed a Ni-catalyzed asymmetric C(sp²)-P coupling of secondary phosphine oxides with alkenyl bromides for generating P-stereogenic alkenylphosphine oxides with high yields and enantioselectivities [86]. The aforementioned examples are more suitable for a specific type of phosphorous nucleophile in a catalytic system, and other phosphorous nucleophiles often yield unsatisfactory results. Therefore, it is particularly desirable to develop a more general approach to realize asymmetric addition of various phosphorous nucleophiles.

  Conjugated enynes are unique compounds that possess easily functionalized alkyne and alkene groups, allowing for modular synthesis through a 1,4-functionalization strategy to obtain chiral allenes instead of chiral 1,3-dienes [87-89]. Although Pd-catalyzed enantioselective hydrofunctionalization of conjugated enynes with N-H [90,91] or C-H [92-94] nucleophile, mediated by the in situ formation of catalytically active palladium(Ⅱ)-hydride species, has been successful in delivering chiral allenes with good yields and enantioselectivities, the asymmetric construction of C-P bonds for the synthesis of chiral allenes or 1,3-dienes remains unexplored [95]. In recent years, our group has been dedicated to investigating the asymmetric addition of phosphorus nucleophiles to unsaturated bonds, including heterobicyclic alkenes [96], alkynes [80,85,97], allenes [98], cyclopropanes [99], alkenyl isoquinolines [100] and methylenecyclopropanes [101]. In this study, we present the catalytic enantioselective hydrophosphorylation and hydrophosphinylation of conjugated enynes using phosphinates or secondary phosphine oxides (SPO) in a Pd-catalyzed system (Scheme 1C). This methodology offers a highly efficient and versatile approach for the synthesis of P-chiral alkenylphosphinates and alkenylphosphine oxides with excellent yields and high enantioselectivities.

  To begin the investigation, enyne 1a and ethyl phenylphosphinate 2a were chosen as the model substrates (Table 1). Based on our previous report [80], Ph₂P(O)OH was included as an additive. Pd(OAc)₂ was selected as the catalyst for screening chiral ligands (L1-L4, entries 1-4). To our delight, (R,R)-QuinoxP* L4 afforded chiral 1,3-dienes 3aa in 87% yield with 92% ee. Omitting Ph₂P(O)OH resulted in a reduced yield of 19% without loss of enantioselectivity (entry 5). Other Pd precursors, such as Pd(dba)₂, Pd₂(dba)₃ and Pd(Piv)₂ were tested and Pd(OAc)₂ was found to be the optimal choice (entry 4 vs. entries 6-8). Decreasing the temperature led to significantly diminished yields while enantioselectivity remained (entry 4 vs. entry 9). The reactions conducted in 1,4-dioxane, THF, and toluene provided product 3aa with similar high yields, but the reaction in toluene exhibited the highest ee (entry 4 vs. entries 10-11). Surprisingly, chiral 1,3-dienes 5aa were also obtained in 92% yield and 87% ee when using secondary phosphine oxide 4a instead of phosphinate 2a (entry 12), demonstrating the generality of this method.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  With the optimal conditions, the substrate scopes were then investigated. It was found that a large range of enynes were applicable in this reaction system (Scheme 2). Aryl enynes bearing electron-donating groups at the para-, meta- or ortho-positions (Me, Et, tBu, n-Pent and OMe) (3ba–3ia), as well as those substituted with electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl, Br and CF₃) (3ja–3na), were all well-tolerated and gave satisfactory results (55%-94% yields, 82%-93% ee). Substrate with thiophene moieties also afforded the desired products 3oa with good yield and good ee (89% yield, 87% ee). Encouraged by the success of enynes, we further expanded the scope of this catalytic system to include various H-phosphinates. Substrate with methyl ester were conducted smoothly to yield the desired product 3ab (79% yield, 82% ee). Isopropyl ester resulted in good yield but decreased enantioselectivity (3ac, 82% yield, 50% ee). Phenylphosphinate with a methyl substituent on the arene ring also worked and gave the product 3ad in 80% yield but only with 20% ee. This transformation was also compatible with ethyl naphthalen-1-ylphosphinate, providing the desired product 3ae in moderate yield and enantioselectivity (78% yield, 62% ee). Alky enyne, enzyl enyne 1p, showed relatively poor reactivity, affording 3pa in 20% yield with 40% ee.

  Scheme 2

  

  Scheme 2.  Substrate scope of enyens and H-phosphinates. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.1 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), (R,R)-Quinoxp* (12 mol%), Ph₂P(O)OH (20 mol%), 0.5 mL toluene, 80 ℃, 18 h.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Encouraged by the success with H-phosphinates, the investigations were extended to include various secondary phosphine oxides (SPO) for the synthesis of alkenylphosphine oxides (Scheme 3). Employing the same condition, HP(O)EtPh 4a exhibited excellent reactivity with various aryl enynes substituted with electron-donating groups (Me, Et, tBu, n-Pent and OMe) (5ba–5ia) or electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl and CF₃) (5ja–5na) at the para-, meta- or ortho-positions, and gave the desired products with good yields with high ee values (27%-92% yields, 80%-91% ee). Notably, a thiophene-enyne also furnished the desired product in 44% yield and 71% ee (5oa). Second phosphine oxides with n-Bu or i-Pr were successfully transformed to alkenylphosphine oxides (5ab-5ac) without any significant steric hindrance effects. Furthermore, second phosphine oxides bearing various substituents on phenyl ring, such as Me, OMe, F, and Cl (5ad-5ai, 44%-83% yield, 79%-95% ee), were well tolerated with the reaction conditions. Interestingly, the introduction of bulky groups did not impact the reactivity. The use of secondary phosphine oxides with ortho-Me or 1-Nap substituent resulted in good yields and enantioselectivity (5ad and 5ai). Ethyl(thiophen-2-yl)phosphine oxide was also compatible, affording the desired product 5aj in 77% yield and 70% ee. The absolute configuration of 5af was confirmed as S-configuration by X-ray crystallography (CCDC: 2322969).

  Scheme 3

  

  Scheme 3.  Substrate scope of enyens and SPO. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.1 mmol), 4 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), (R,R)-Quinoxp* (12 mol%), Ph₂P(O)OH (20 mol%), 0.5 mL toluene, 80 ℃, 18 h.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To estimate the synthetic potential of this catalytic system, gram–scale reactions were performed, giving 3la and 5ea in good yields without loss of enantioselectivity (Scheme 4a). Further transformations of the hydrophosphorylation products were also discovered. Product 3la underwent Sonogashira coupling to deliver compound 7 smoothly (Scheme 4b). In addition, the dihydrophosphorylation of dienynes 1q led to the formation of C-symmetric products 3qa in 54% yield and 83% ee (Scheme 4c).

  Scheme 4

  

  Scheme 4.  Gram-scale version of the reaction and synthetic transformation.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To gain insights into the potential reaction mechanism, deuterium-labelling experiments were conducted using D₂-1a or D-P(O)EtPh (D-4a) as starting materials. Since D-P(O)EtPh readily converted to H-P(O)EtPh at room temperature in the presence of Ph₂P(O)OH, deuterium labelling experiment were conducted without the addition of Ph₂P(O)OH. Firstly, enyne 1a and D-P(O)EtPh were subjected to the optimized reaction conditions without Ph₂P(O)OH at 90 ℃, due to low reactivity of D-P(O)EtPh in standard condition. 80% deuterium incorporation was observed at the 4-position. Surprisingly, 30% deuterium incorporation was also observed at the terminal alkene positions, along with 20% incorporation of deuterium at the 2-position (Scheme 5A, a). These results suggested that the hydrophosphinylation reaction of enyne existed other reversible pathway. These results were different with previous report on hydrofunctionalization of conjugated enynes to give diene [84] or allenes [90-94], suggesting the reaction is not a direct hydrophosphinylation of the alkyne, but involves other reversible pathways. Then, when enyne D₂-1a and D-P(O)EtPh were used as the starting material, deuterium incorporation was observed at the 4-positions to a 70% extent, deuterium incorporation at the terminal alkene positions to 70% (reduced from 87%), and 30% incorporation of deuterium at the 2-position (D-5aa-2). These results indicate that the hydropalladation of alkene in the enyne is a reversible process (Scheme 5A, b). Finally, when enyne D₂-1a reacted with H-P(O)EtPh, the resulting product D-5aa-3 exhibited 10% incorporation of deuterium at the 2-position and 75% incorporation of deuterium at the terminal alkene positions. This observation confirms that the deuterium incorporation at the 2-position originates from the terminal alkene of D₂-1a, further supporting the reversibility of the hydropalladation of the alkene in the enyne (Scheme 5A, c).

  Scheme 5

  

  Scheme 5.  Deuterium labelling experiment and possible reaction pathways.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Based on previous reports about hydrofunctionalization of conjugated enynes [90-94], Pd-catalyzed intermolecular functionalization of conjugated enynes typically leads to the formation of allenes through the intermediate η³-butadienyl−Pd (Ⅷ), which is derived from η¹-butadienyl−Pd (Ⅶ). However, the phosphinylallene product through η³-butadienyl−Pd (Ⅷ) with phosphinates or secondary phosphine oxides were not formed in current study, showing the active species in this transformation was intermediate Ⅶ rather than intermediate Ⅷ. Based on our previous work on palladium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrophosphorylation of alkynes [80] and deuterium labeling experiment, we hypothesized that a chiral palladium complex Ⅰ generates from Pd(OAc)₂ and (R,R)-QuinoxP*. Then, the oxidative addition of P–H bond of phosphorous nucleophile or the O–H bond of Ph₂P(O)OH to the palladium complex triggers the reaction, producing the hydropalladation intermediate Ⅱ. Intermediate Ⅱ coordinates with enyne to give intermediate Ⅲ and Ⅳ, which undergo tautomerism. Intermediate Ⅶ is formed by alkyne insertion into a palladium hydride species (Ⅲ), as confirmed by incorporation of deuterium of D-5aa-1 and D-5aa-2. Additionally, the intermediates Ⅴ and Ⅵ are produced via hydropalladation of alkene. These intermediate then undergo β-H-elimination to give intermediate Ⅳ that is coincided with the deuterium labelling experiment (Scheme 5B).

  According to the deuterium labelling experiment and previous reports [80,90,102], we assumed chiral palladium complex Ⅰ undergoes oxidative addition of Ph₂P(O)OH to generate the hydropalladation Ⅱ-1. After that, hydropalladation of enyne occurs, leading to the formation of the intermediate Ⅶ-1. Subsequent ligand exchange of intermediate Ⅶ-1 with phosphinates or secondary phosphine oxides gives the internal phosphorylpalladium intermediate Ⅶ-2 (Path A). Since the reaction also proceeds in the absence of Ph₂P(O)OH, an alternative pathway is also possible, in which the intermediate Ⅱ-2 is generated directly through the oxidative addition of the P–H bond of phosphorous nucleophile to palladium. This is followed by hydropalladation of enyne, resulting in the same intermediate Ⅶ-2 (Path B). Finally, the reductive elimination of intermediate Ⅶ-2 gives the desired product and regenerates chiral palladium complex Ⅰ (Scheme 6).

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  the proposed mechanism of hydrophosphorylation and hydrophosphinylation of conjugated enynes.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, a versatile Pd/(R,R)-Quinoxp* system was developed for achieving highly regio- and enantioselective construction of alkenylphosphinates and alkenylphosphine oxides with P-chirality. The mechanistic study has revealed a different pathway for the Pd-catalyzed hydrofunctionalization reaction of enyne, which refreshes the understanding of hydrofunctionalization of conjugated enynes.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Yanxin Jiang: Methodology. Kwai Wun Cheng: Methodology. Zhiping Yang: Writing – original draft, Project administration. Jun (Joelle) Wang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

  Acknowledgments

  We gratefully thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 22271241), Yunnan Key Laboratory of Chiral Functional Substance Research and Application (No. 202402AN360010), Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (GRF, No. 12303422), and HKBU KRPS grant for financial support. Dr. Xiaoyong Chang from SUSTech is gratefully acknowledged for X-ray crystallographic analysis.

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110231.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     G.P. Horsman, D.L. Zechel, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 5704-5783. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00536

  2. [2]

     H. Ni, W.L. Chan, Y. Lu, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 9344-9411. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00261

  3. [3]

     C. Wang, M. Taki, Y. Sato, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 (2019) 15817-15822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905924116

  4. [4]

     C. Fave, T.Y. Cho, M. Hissler, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 9254-9255. doi: 10.1021/ja035155w

  5. [5]

     C.G. Newton, S.G. Wang, C.C. Oliveira, N. Cramer, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 8908-8976. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00692

  6. [6]

     J.J. Verendel, O. Pàmies, M. Diéguez, P.G. Andersson, Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 2130-2169. doi: 10.1021/cr400037u

  7. [7]

     G. Xu, C.H. Senanayake, W. Tang, Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (2019) 1101-1112. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00029

  8. [8]

     D. Mandal, S. Roychowdhury, J.P. Biswas, S. Maiti, D. Maiti, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 7358-7426. doi: 10.1039/d1cs00923k

  9. [9]

     M. Dutartre, J. Bayardon, S. Jugé, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 5771-5794. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00031B

  10. [10]

      B. Join, D. Mimeau, O. Delacroix, A.C. Gaumont, Chem. Commun. (2006) 3249-3251.

  11. [11]

      Y.B. Li, H. Tian, L. Yin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 20098-20106. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09654

  12. [12]

      R.H.X. Teo, H.J. Chen, Y. Li, S.A. Pullarkat, P.H. Leung, Adv. Synth. Catal. 362 (2020) 2373-2378. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202000131

  13. [13]

      C. Wang, K. Huang, J. Ye, W.L. Duan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 5685-5690. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c02772

  14. [14]

      Z.H. Wu, A.Q. Cheng, M. Yuan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 27241-27246. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111137

  15. [15]

      D. Ji, J. Jing, Y. Wang, et al., Chem 8 (2022) 3346-3362. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.08.019

  16. [16]

      Y. Wang, Z.Q. Wang, L. Yin, Synthesis 55 (2023) 2228-2240. doi: 10.3390/f14112228

  17. [17]

      Y.B. Li, Y. Li, L. Yin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109294-109300. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109294

  18. [18]

      R. Beaud, R.J. Phipps, M.J. Gaunt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 13183-13186. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09334

  19. [19]

      Y. Zhang, H. He, Q. Wang, Q. Cai, Tetrahedron Lett. 57 (2016) 5308-5311. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.10.048

  20. [20]

      Q. Dai, W. Li, Z. Li, J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 20556-20564. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11938

  21. [21]

      W.Q. Cai, Q. Wei, Q.W. Zhang, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 1258-1262. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c00209

  22. [22]

      Y. Li, X. Jin, P. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202117093. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117093

  23. [23]

      R. Cui, Y. Wang, L. Yuwen, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 6139-6142. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c02216

  24. [24]

      J. Kang, K. Ding, S.M. Ren, B. Su, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301628. doi: 10.1002/anie.202301628

  25. [25]

      J. Kang, S. Ren, B. Su, Synlett 35 (2024) 741–746. doi: 10.1055/a-2127-1305

  26. [26]

      B. Liu, P. Liu, X. Wang, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 2178-2183. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00099

  27. [27]

      B. Zhang, W.Q. Zhou, X.T. Liu, Y. Sun, Q.W. Zhang, Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 1286-1290. doi: 10.1039/d2sc05841c

  28. [28]

      Q. Zhang, R.R. Cui, Q.W. Zhang, Synlett 34 (2023) 1819-1823. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1751456

  29. [29]

      X. Zhang, S.Q. Wang, S.D. Yang, Sci. China Chem. 66 (2023) 2569-2575. doi: 10.1007/s11426-023-1678-1

  30. [30]

      Z.J. Du, J. Guan, G.J. Wu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 632-635. doi: 10.1021/ja512029x

  31. [31]

      Z.Q. Lin, W.Z. Wang, S.B. Yan, W.L. Duan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 6265-6269. doi: 10.1002/anie.201500201

  32. [32]

      L. Liu, A.A. Zhang, Y. Wang, et al., Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 2046-2049. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00122

  33. [33]

      G. Xu, M. Li, S. Wang, W. Tang, Org. Chem. Front. 2 (2015) 1342-1345. doi: 10.1039/C5QO00142K

  34. [34]

      Y.H. Chen, X.L. Qin, J. Guan, Z.J. Du, F.S. Han, Tetrahedron Asymmetry 28 (2017) 522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2017.03.008

  35. [35]

      Y.S. Jang, M. Dieckmann, N. Cramer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 15088-15092. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708440

  36. [36]

      Y. Lin, W.Y. Ma, Q.Y. Sun, Y.M. Cui, L.W. Xu, Synlett 28 (2017) 1432-1436. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1588983

  37. [37]

      Y. Sun, L. Wozniak, J. Pedroni, N. Cramer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 364-367. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606637

  38. [38]

      Y.S. Jang, Ł. Woźniak, J. Pedroni, N. Cramer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 12901-12905. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807749

  39. [39]

      Y. Sun, N. Cramer, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 2981-2985. doi: 10.1039/c7sc05411d

  40. [40]

      Z. Li, Z.Q. Lin, C.G. Yan, W.L. Duan, Organometallics 38 (2019) 3916-3920. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00216

  41. [41]

      P. Hu, L. Kong, F. Wang, X. Zhu, X. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 20424-20429. doi: 10.1002/anie.202106871

  42. [42]

      S.Y. Song, Y. Li, Z. Ke, S. Xu, ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 13445-13451. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c03888

  43. [43]

      J.H. Chen, M.Y. Teng, F.R. Huang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 61 (2022) e202210106. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210106

  44. [44]

      Q.J. Yao, J.H. Chen, H. Song, F.R. Huang, B.F. Shi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202202892. doi: 10.1002/anie.202202892

  45. [45]

      C.W. Zhang, X.Q. Hu, Y.H. Dai, et al., ACS Catal. 12 (2022) 193-199. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05080

  46. [46]

      Y. Lin, T. von Münchow, L. Ackermann, ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 9713-9723. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02072

  47. [47]

      T. von Münchow, S. Dana, Y. Xu, B. Yuan, L. Ackermann, Science 379 (2023) 1036-1042. doi: 10.1126/science.adg2866

  48. [48]

      G. Zhou, J.H. Chen, Q.J. Yao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202302964. doi: 10.1002/anie.202302964

  49. [49]

      T. Zhou, L.J. Fan, Z.J. Chen, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 5724-5729. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01865

  50. [50]

      A. Das, R. Mandal, H.S. Ravi Sankar, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202315005. doi: 10.1002/anie.202315005

  51. [51]

      T. Liu, W. Zhang, C. Xu, et al., Green Chem. 25 (2023) 3606-3614. doi: 10.1039/d3gc00455d

  52. [52]

      Z.J. Chen, L.J. Fan, P.P. Xie, et al., Chem. Commun. 60 (2024) 1623-1626. doi: 10.1039/d3cc05052a

  53. [53]

      X.T. Liu, Y.Q. Zhang, X.Y. Han, S.P. Sun, Q.W. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 16584-16589. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08734

  54. [54]

      Q. Zhang, X.T. Liu, Y. Wu, Q.W. Zhang, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 8683-8687. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02986

  55. [55]

      S. Zhang, J.Z. Xiao, Y.B. Li, C.Y. Shi, L. Yin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 9912-9921. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c04112

  56. [56]

      X.L. Zhang, X. Qi, Y.X. Wu, P. Liu, Y. He, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2 (2021) 100594-100610. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100594

  57. [57]

      Z. Huang, X.T. Liu, R. Cui, Q.W. Zhang, Org. Biomol. Chem. 21 (2023) 3096-3100. doi: 10.1039/d3ob00389b

  58. [58]

      G. Nishida, K. Noguchi, M. Hirano, K. Tanaka, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 3410-3413. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800144

  59. [59]

      J. S. Harvey, S.J. Malcolmson, K.S. Dunne, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48 (2009) 762-766. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805066

  60. [60]

      F. de Azambuja, R.C. Carmona, T.H.D. Chorro, G. Heerdt, C.R.D. Correia, Chem. Eur. J. 22 (2016) 11205-11209. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602572

  61. [61]

      K.M.H. Lim, T. Hayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 8122-8125. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04570

  62. [62]

      Z. Wang, T. Hayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 1702-1706. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712572

  63. [63]

      Y. Zheng, L. Guo, W. Zi, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 7039-7043. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02982

  64. [64]

      H. Fernández-Pérez, A. Vidal-Ferran, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 7019-7023. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02606

  65. [65]

      B. M. Trost, S.M. Spohr, A.B. Rolka, C.A. Kalnmals, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 14098-14103. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07340

  66. [66]

      Y. Zhang, F. Zhang, L. Chen, et al., ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 4834-4840. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00860

  67. [67]

      L. B. Balázs, Y. Huang, J.B. Khalikuzzaman, et al., J. Org. Chem. 85 (2020) 14763-14771. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00181

  68. [68]

      R.Y. Zhu, L. Chen, X.S. Hu, F. Zhou, J. Zhou, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 97-106. doi: 10.1039/c9sc04938j

  69. [69]

      Q. Dai, L. Liu, J. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 27247-27252. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111957

  70. [70]

      Y.B. Li, H. Tian, S. Zhang, J.Z. Xiao, L. Yin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202117760. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117760

  71. [71]

      L. Pang, Q. Sun, Z. Huang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202211710. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211710

  72. [72]

      L. Pang, Z. Huang, Q. Sun, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 4437-4447. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40138-8

  73. [73]

      L. Pang, C. Wang, C. Ma, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 7705-7710. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c02998

  74. [74]

      S.B. Yan, R. Wang, Z.G. Li, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2264-2272. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37987-8

  75. [75]

      Y.Y. Sun, B. Zhang, L. Yu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 5084-5087. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054

  76. [76]

      W.J. Yue, J.Z. Xiao, S. Zhang, L. Yin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 7057-7062. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916076

  77. [77]

      X. Yang, G. Liu, X. Xiang, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 738-743. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c04105

  78. [78]

      X. Liu, Z. Han, Z. Wang, K. Ding, Sci. China Chem. 57 (2014) 1073-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11426-014-5134-7

  79. [79]

      L.B. Han, C.Q. Zhao, S.Y. Onozawa, M. Goto, M. Tanaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 3842-3843. doi: 10.1021/ja025816+

  80. [80]

      Z. Yang, X. Gu, L.B. Han, J. Wang, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 7451-7455. doi: 10.1039/d0sc01049a

  81. [81]

      Q. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Qian, W. Li, J. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 20645-20650. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009358

  82. [82]

      X.T. Liu, X.Y. Han, Y. Wu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 11309-11316. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c05649

  83. [83]

      W.H. Wang, Y. Wu, P.J. Qi, Q.W. Zhang, ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 6994-7001. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00539

  84. [84]

      Y.Q. Zhang, X.Y. Han, Y. Wu, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 4095-4102. doi: 10.1039/D2SC00091A

  85. [85]

      B. Cai, Y. Cui, J. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202215820. doi: 10.1002/anie.202215820

  86. [86]

      C. Wang, X. Hu, C. Xu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202300011. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300011

  87. [87]

      O. Pàmies, J. Margalef, S. Cañellas, et al., Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 4373-4505. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00736

  88. [88]

      L. Fu, S. Greßies, P. Chen, G. Liu, Chin. J. Chem. 38 (2020) 91-100. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201900277

  89. [89]

      G. Cera, G. Maestri, ChemCatChem 14 (2022) e202200295. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202200295

  90. [90]

      N. J. Adamson, H. Jeddi, S.J. Malcolmson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 8574-8583. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02637

  91. [91]

      Q. Li, X. Fang, R. Pan, H. Yao, A. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 11364-11376. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03620

  92. [92]

      S.Q. Yang, Y.F. Wang, W.C. Zhao, G.Q. Lin, Z.T. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 7285-7291. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03157

  93. [93]

      H. Tsukamoto, T. Konno, K. Ito, T. Doi, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 6811-6814. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02439

  94. [94]

      L. Li, S. Wang, P. Luo, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 5667-5677. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25981-x

  95. [95]

      S.N. Yang, S.H. Sun, C.H. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107914-107918. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107914

  96. [96]

      Z. Lu, H. Zhang, Z. Yang, et al., ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 1457-1463. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04787

  97. [97]

      X. Gu, K. Ngai, W. Wang, B. Li, J. Wang, Chem. Catal. 4 (2024) 100903-100916. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2024.100903

  98. [98]

      Z. Yang, J. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 27288-27292. doi: 10.1002/anie.202112285

  99. [99]

      Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang, M. Li, Z. Huang, J. Wang, Chem. Catal. 2 (2022) 3163-3173. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.08.008

  100. [100]

       Q. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Wang, Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 4413-4417. doi: 10.1039/d2sc06950d

  101. [101]

       J. Zhou, L. Meng, S. Lin, B. Cai, J. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202303727. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303727

  102. [102]

       T. Chen, C.Q. Zhao, L.B. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 3139-3155. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00550

• 

  Scheme 1  Asymmetric addition of P-nucleophiles to alkynes.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 2  Substrate scope of enyens and H-phosphinates. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.1 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), (R,R)-Quinoxp* (12 mol%), Ph₂P(O)OH (20 mol%), 0.5 mL toluene, 80 ℃, 18 h.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 3  Substrate scope of enyens and SPO. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.1 mmol), 4 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), (R,R)-Quinoxp* (12 mol%), Ph₂P(O)OH (20 mol%), 0.5 mL toluene, 80 ℃, 18 h.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 4  Gram-scale version of the reaction and synthetic transformation.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 5  Deuterium labelling experiment and possible reaction pathways.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  the proposed mechanism of hydrophosphorylation and hydrophosphinylation of conjugated enynes.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Optimization of the reaction conditions.^a

  下载: 导出CSV
•