English

• Bridged bicyclic cores have garnered exceptionally broad interests in recent years, largely because of the notation of “escape from flatland” that is prevailing in medicinal chemistry [1-5]. Therefore, the synthesis of bicyclic frameworks has evolved to a rapidly growing area in synthetic organic chemistry. For example, during the past few years, a wealth of studies have been directed toward the construction and application of bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes (BCPs), which serve as 3D bioisosteres of para-substituted phenyl rings [6-10]. In contrast, the analogous bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes (BCHs), which are bioisosteres of mono-substituted or ortho/meta-disubsituted benzene, received much less attention (Fig. 1A). In this context, intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition of hexa-1,5-dienes is demonstrated to be an appealing strategy for the assembly of BCHs for decades. While efficient, UV light irradiation is always required in most reported examples, which more or less attenuates its broader applications [11-17]. Recently, Riggoti/Bach [18], Fessard/Salomé [19] and Walker [20] have took a massive stride forward in extending the applicability of this strategy by using visible light irradiation, however, a conjugated aryl group proved to be indispensable for substrate activation, thus engendering a much restricted flexibility of functionality at the bridgehead of BCHs (Fig. 1B, left equation). Alternatively, by leveraging the strain-release-driven cycloaddition of bicyclobutanes (BCBs), a straightforward synthesis of BCHs/(hetero)BCHs with much expanded structural diversity was successfully developed by the groups of Glorius [21-24], Brown [25], Leicht [26], Li [27], Procter [28], Wang [29], Deng [30], Feng [31] and Studer [32], particularly for those containing C2 and C3 substituents (Fig. 1B, right equation). Notwithstanding the impressive progress, conspicuous limitation with respect to structural diversity of BCHs is still of concern. Driven by the ever-increasing demand of structurally diversified BCHs in drug development, the continuing exploration of more general and practical synthetic protocols, especially those targeting BCHs beyond the reach of prior arts, is still highly sought after.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  State-of-arts for construction of bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As a popular tactic in drug design, incorporation of fluorine atoms into the structure of drug candidates is routinely employed for improving binding affinity, metabolic stability and bioavailability [33-35]. However, the combination of fluorine substitution and bridged bicyclic framework, namely the fluorinated bicyclic structural motifs, remains essentially underexplored. We surmise that the main reason for this outcome may lie in the deficiency of effective synthetic protocols [36,37]. Taking consideration of the daunting challenge of peripheral decoration of bicyclic compound through site-selective C(sp³)−H bond fluorination, resorting to use of fluorinated building blocks is anticipated to be more amenable. Nevertheless, appropriate fluorinated substrate for this aim is not easily available, and the presence of fluorine atom often led to unpredictable influence to property and reactivity of the parent counterpart. For example, the photoredox reactivity of gem–difluoroalkene would complicate its involvement in cycloaddition reaction triggered by photoinduced triplet energy transfer [38-41]. Moreover, the different forms of fluorine substitution might necessitate contrasting reaction conditions for smooth transformation. To the best of our knowledge, only sporadic examples of fluorinated bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes (F-BCHs) have been reported [42-45]. For instance, Mykhailiuk reported a synthesis of 1-fluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanecarboxylic acid from mono-fluoroalkene, however, only single example was demonstrated (Fig. 1A, right) [45]. In 2021, we reported an efficient synthesis of 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes through a S_N2’ defluorinative allylation of trifluoromethylalkenes with allylsilanes, and a tandem process integrating ensuing Cope rearrangement, on the other hand, led to an expedient generation of 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes [46,47]. Inspired by these findings, we envisaged whether the readily available fluorinated hexa-1,5-dienes could be employed in the synthesis of F-BCHs. Herein, we would like to report our recent progress for the synthesis of 5,5-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes (5,5-diF-BCHs) by photocatalysis. Moreover, isomeric 2,2-diF-BCHs could also be readily constructed by the same catalytic system from 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes deriving from Cope rearrangement of 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes, thus permitting a switchable synthesis of both constitutional isomers of diF-BCHs (Fig. 1C). Additionally, the applicability of dienyne and triene scaffolds allows more flexible derivatization of the resultant diF-BCHs. Being distinguished by the easy availability of starting materials, operational simplicity, mild reaction conditions and broad substrate scope, the present method provides an efficient synthetic tool for the construction of valuable diF-BCHs.

  Our study commenced with examination of 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-diene featuring 2-biphenyl substituent (1a), that is easily obtained by our reported γ-defluorinative allylation of trifluoromethylalkenes [46]. Initially, blue light with relatively low energy (λ = 460 nm) was selected as the light source, which was supposed to offer good compatibility of various functionalities. Then the photocatalysts were screened at ambient temperature in DMSO. While benzophenone and thioxanthen-9-one which are commonly used as triplet sensitizers were found ineffective, 4CzIPN furnished the desired product in 30% yield (Table 1, entries 1–3). Encouraged by this result, we further attempted the transition-metal based photocatalysts (entries 4–8), and Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) was proved the optimal choice (entry 5). Subsequently, the solvent effect was evaluated. DCM displayed comparable reaction efficiency as DMSO, whereas THF, dioxane and methanol were less effective or invalid (entries 9–12). The reaction was revealed insensitive to the wavelength of light source. The light with wavelength ranging from 390 nm to 460 nm all offered excellent reaction efficiency (entries 13 and 14). Control experiments showed the photocatalyst and photoirradiation were both essential for the reaction.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  Under the optimized conditions, the scope and limitations were investigated for the synthesis of 5,5-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes (Fig. 2). The substrates bearing an aryl group conjugated with the gem–difluoroalkene moiety generally worked well. A wide spectrum of functional groups decorated on different positions of the phenyl ring were tolerated, such as alkoxyl (2b-2e), alkyl (2f), alkenyl (2g), halides (2h-2j), ester (2k and 2l), amide (2m), trifluoromethyl (2n), and sulfonyl (2o). The structure of 2f was unambiguously determined by X-ray crystallography. Remarkably, the styrene (2g) and arylbromide (2j) motifs which are potentially sensitive towards photosensitization were amenable, albeit with decreased yields. On the other hand, the synthesis of the arylsulfone containing 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-diene was complicated by serious allylprotonation reaction, which was subjected to the photocatalyzed cycloaddition without further purification (see Supporting information for details). The telescoped procedure provided 2o in 36% yield over two steps, and the modest yield was largely caused by the first step. Pi-conjugated systems, such as naphthyl (2p and 2q) and 5-benzofuryl (2r) groups were demonstrated to be compatible with the reaction conditions. Moreover, the reactions with O- and N-containing heteroaromatic substitution, including benzofuran (2s), pyridine (2t) and quinoline (2u), afforded the desired products in good to excellent yields. Particularly noteworthy is feasibility of dienyne substrate which gave rise to alkynyl substituted diF-BCHs (2v and 2w). The bridgehead substituted alkynyl group is poised for a broad array of further transformations. The mild reaction conditions render the approach useful for late-stage functionalizations as shown by the synthesis of diF-BCH tethered with a glucose motif (2x). The cycloaddition took place smoothly even with more challenging triene system (2y). As in the case of 2o, a telescoped procedure was used because of the poor stability of the corresponding triene (1y), thereby providing the expected product in 42% yield over two steps (see Supporting information for details). In addition to C1-substituted diF-BCHs, this method also allows the incorporation of substituents at multi-position (C1, C3 and C4) by using readily accessible 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes. Bridgehead-disubstituted (C1, C4) diF-BCHs could be achieved from the substrates bearing aryl and alkyl substituents at 2- and 4-position, respectively (2z, 2aa, and 2ab). The generality of the method has also been examined through the synthesis of a series of poly-substituted scaffolds. DiF-BCH bearing substituents at 1,2-position (2ac) was achieved by this method in 70% yield with 11:1 diastereoselectivity. A fused tricyclic system was also applicable (2ad) despite the increased strain. Furthermore, the substituents including hydroxyl and ester groups, could be installed on the 1,3-, 1,3,3- and 1,2,2,4-position. It was shown 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes bearing two aromatic substituents at both 2- and 5-position yielded 5,5- and 2,2-positional regioisomers favoring 2,2-diF-BCHs in 94% overall yield (5,5-/2,2- = 1:3.7, 2ah and 3a). The formation CF₂-transposed product (3a-3d) was found to be relevant to the electronic property of R²-substituent which is in conjugation with non-fluorinated alkene motif, and the yields of 2,2-diF-BCHs increased with a progressive enhancement of electron-donating ability of that substituent (3b vs. 3c). Such a trend could be further corroborated by the replacement the 5-aryl group with an ester moiety, which afforded 2,2-diF-BCH in much lower ratio (5,5-/2,2- = 4.8:1, 2ak and 3d). Control experiments showed Cope rearrangement of the 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes of this type could occur at room temperature and be promoted by PC under photoirradiation (see Supporting information for details), thus providing structurally reorganized products.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 5,5-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.002 mmol, 1 mol%) in DMSO or DCM (0.3 mL) was irradiated under Blue LEDs (460 nm) at room temperature. ^aA telescoped procedure was used and overall yield of two steps was indicated. ^bIr(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(dtbbpy)(PF₆) was used instead of Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Intrigued by the results to furnish 2,2-diF-[2.1.1]BCHs along with their 5,5-regioisomer, we sought to probe the synthesis of these scaffolds from 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes that are readily available through the defluorinative allylation of trifluoromethylalkenes developed by our group previously (Fig. 3) [47]. To our delight, the desired 2,2-diF-[2.1.1]BCH 3a was obtained exclusively from the 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes under similar reaction conditions with excellent efficiency as well and the structure was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. The substituent at the bridgehead distal to the CF₂ could be changed to ester (3d), alkyl (3e and 3f) groups without affecting the reaction efficiency, underscoring the potential for variation at the position. Then the generality of the aromatic substituents at 1-position was briefly surveyed. The reaction proceeded uniformly well irrespective of the nature of the arene substituent (3g-3j). CF₂ linked dienynes were still competent substrates in this reaction, providing both of the mono-substituted (3k) and 1,4-disubstituted 2,2-diF-BCH (3l) in excellent yields. The cycloaddition could be expanded to an analogous triene system successfully, giving an alkenyl substituted product 3m in 57%. Considering the privileged utility of 1,5-disubstituted BCHs as the bioisostere of ortho-disubstituted arenes, we probed the viability of the 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-diene bearing substituents at 2- and 6-position concomitantly, with which reaction proceeded in high efficiency with 6:1 diastereoselectivity (3n). In addition, a carbocycle-embedded substrate could participate into the reaction to furnish a tricyclic product 3o in synthetically useful yield.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 2,2-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.002 mmol, 1 mol%) in DMSO or DCM (0.3 mL) was irradiated under blue LEDs (460 nm) at room temperature.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To showcase the synthetic application of the present method, some follow-up transformations of the diF-[2.1.1]BCHs were explored (Fig. 4). Given the synthetic versatility of alkynyl groups, 5,5-diF-BCH 2v was chosen as the model compound, which was readily prepared on 6 mmol scale in 82% yield. Through a simple oxidation, a carboxylic acid 5 was obtained in 60% yield, and the following Curtius reaction delivered a diF-BCHs substituted urea 6 in 82% yield. Also, the hydrogenation catalyzed by Pd/C provided an alkyl substituted diF-BCHs 7 that is unable to be prepared by the direct [2 + 2] cycloaddition of the corresponding 5,5-difluorohexa-1,5-diene. We attempted the Larock’s indole synthesis with the internal alkyne 2v, by which an indole featuring a diF-BCH motif 8 was accessed successfully. Further demonstration of the synthetic potential of this method focused upon the elaboration of 2,2-diF-BCH 3l that carries an alkynyl and an ester group at the C1 and C4 position, respectively. Initially, oxidation of the C−C triple bond led to the formation of a versatile synthon, mono-ester of 1,4-dicarboxylic acid 9, in 60% yield. Meanwhile, the dicarboxylic acid 10 could be obtained in 75% by oxidation and basic work-up from 3l The availability of carboxylic acids presents an opportunity to access halo-substituted diF-[2.1.1]BCHs. Following the reported method, diiodide 11 was prepared through a Barton ester in 52% yield.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Synthetic application of diF-BCHs. (a) Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.5 mol%), blue LEDs (460 nm, 20 W), DMSO (6 mL), r.t. (b) RuO₂·H₂O (10 mol%), NaIO₄ (8.0 equiv.), MeCN/H₂O (15 mL, 3:2), r.t. (c) 1. Ph₂P(=O)N₃ (1.5 equiv.), Et₃N (1.4 equiv.), THF (2 mL), reflux; 2. pyrrolidine (3.0 equiv.), reflux. (d) Pd/C (10 wt%), H₂ (1 atm), EtOAc (1 mL). (e) 2v (1.2 equiv.), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), PPh₃ (20 mol%), 2-iodoaniline (1.0 equiv.), TABCl (1.0 equiv.), Na₂SO₄ (5.0 equiv.), DMF (2.0 mL), 95 ℃. (f) Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.5 mol%), blue LEDs (460 nm, 15 W), DMSO (8 mL), r.t. (g) 1. RuO₂·H₂O (10 mol%), NaIO₄ (8.0 equiv.), MeCN/H₂O (15 mL, 3:2), r.t.; 2. NaOH (5.0 equiv.), THF/H₂O (30 mL, 1:1). (h) 1. SOCl₂ (8.0 equiv.), DMF (cat.), DCM (20 mL), 40 ℃; 2. 2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide (3.0 equiv.), CF₃CH₂I (10.0 equiv.), DMAP (7 mol%), DCM (60 mL), 40 ℃.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Generally, a photoinduced triplet energy transfer and subsequent intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition via a diradical intermediate is proposed for the formation of BCHs from 1,5-dienes [11-19]. Yet, despite the fact that gem–difluoroalkenes have been reported to engage in photocatalyzed cyclization reactions, the predominant scenarios rely on an intramolecular radical addition to the fluorinated alkene moiety [48,49], and the energy transfer associated transformation with gem–difluoroalkenes is rare [50]. To provide deeper insight into the reaction mechanism, density-functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out (Fig. 5). Initially, the triplet energy (E_T) for 1a was calculated to be 44.4 kcal/mol (Fig. 5a), which matches with E_T of Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (PC, 60.7 kcal/mol). Moreover, this value is significantly lower than the non-fluorinated analogue 1a’ (50.5 kcal/mol) and such a lowering of E_T has been suggested to be favorable for the energy transfer process [51,52]. In contrast, moving difluoride to the allylic position of hexa-1,5-diene (4g) led to only minimal change of the E_T (from 50.5 to 50.3 kcal/mol). On the other hand, the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) energy analysis suggested a positive influence of allylic fluorine that could be attributed to the decreased FMOs energies. Compared with 1a’, the FMO energies of 4g are closer to the SOMOs of PC, thus allowing enhanced efficiency of Dexter energy transfer (Fig. 5b) [53-56]. In addition, owing to the presence of fluorine atoms, particularly in the cases of 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes, two different reaction pathways, including 5-exo and 5-endo, could be conceived for the cyclization step. The 5-exo cyclization of diradical Int1 requires overcoming a Gibbs energy barrier of 5.2 kcal/mol to yield the Int2exo, whose formation is computed to be exergonic by 22.7 kcal/mol relative to Int1. In comparison, the Gibbs energy barrier for 5-endo cyclization of Int1 to Int2endo is computed to be 23.5 kcal/mol, which is much higher than the 5-exo pathway (Fig. 5c). This is in agreement with the experimental result obtained from the 1,1-difluorohexa-1,5-diene bearing a cyclopropane substituent at 5-position, with which the three-member ring remained intact in the product 2ab. Overall, the fluorine atoms were revealed as enabling substituents for the triplet energy transfer event. More importantly, the fluorine effects could be corroborated experimentally (Fig. 6). The non-fluorinated triene 12, analogous to gem–difluorotriene 1y, was prepared and subjected to standard conditions, but failed to give the target BCH product 13 and only complex mixture was observed. Meanwhile, diF-BCH 2y was accomplished successfully. Such a comparison unequivocally demonstrated the critical role of fluorine in the [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction, especially for the challenging substrate.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  Mechanistic investigations.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  Evaluation of fluorine effects.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, we have successfully disclosed a general synthetic protocol for the expedient construction of gem–difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes, which represent a class of bicyclic compounds still remaining challenging to prepare. By exploiting visible-light photocatalyzed [2 + 2] cycloaddition, the readily available 1,1- and 3,3-difluorohexa-1,5-dienes by our reported methods allow the incorporation of fluorine atoms into BCH backbone at 2,2- and 5,5-positions with precise regiocontrol. Moreover, through the downstream elaboration of the resulting diF-BCHs, a variety of synthetically useful building blocks, including diF-BCH-substituted heterocycle, carboxylic acid, amine and halide could be accessed. In view of its broad scope and convenient operation, we envision that the protocol will find practical application in the drug discovery process and evoke new efforts for the forge of structurally diversified fluorinated bicyclic skeletons.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Mengyu Wu: Investigation. Kewei Ren: Validation. Chengyu Zou: Validation. Jiacheng Chen: Validation. Rui Ma: Validation. Chuan Zhu: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization. Chao Feng: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

  Acknowledgments

  We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22271151), and the Distinguished Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province.

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110213.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     P.K. Mykhailiuk, Org. Biomol. Chem. 17 (2019) 2839–2849. doi: 10.1039/c8ob02812e

  2. [2]

     M.A.M. Subbaiah, N.A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 64 (2021) 14046–14128. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01215

  3. [3]

     O.O. Grygorenko, D.M. Volochnyuk, B.V. Vashchenko, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021 (2021) 6478–6510. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202100857

  4. [4]

     M.R. Bauer, P.D. Fruscia, S.C.C. Lucas, et al., RSC Med. Chem. 12 (2021) 448–471. doi: 10.1039/d0md00370k

  5. [5]

     Y.P. Auberson, C. Brocklehurst, M. Furegati, et al., ChemMedChem 12 (2017) 590–598. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201700082

  6. [6]

     X. Zhang, R.T. Smith, C. Le, et al., Nature 580 (2020) 220–226. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2060-z

  7. [7]

     Y. Yang, J. Tsien, J.M.E. Hughes, et al., Nat. Chem. 13 (2021) 950–955. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00786-z

  8. [8]

     W. Dong, E. Yen-Pon, L. Li, et al., Nat. Chem. 14 (2022) 1068–1077. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-00979-0

  9. [9]

     S. Kim, H. Oh, W. Dong, et al., ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 9542–9549. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02339

  10. [10]

      B.R. Shire, E.A. Anderson, JACS Au 3 (2023) 1539–1553. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00014

  11. [11]

      R.S.H. Liu, G.S. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89 (1967) 4936–4944. doi: 10.1021/ja00995a019

  12. [12]

      E. Fischer, R. Gleiter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 28 (1989) 925–927. doi: 10.1002/anie.198909251

  13. [13]

      R.A. Kleinnijenhuis, B.J.J. Timmer, G. Lutteke, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 22 (2016) 1266–1269. doi: 10.1002/chem.201504894

  14. [14]

      K. Takao, H. Kai, A. Yamada, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 9851–9855. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904404

  15. [15]

      A. Denisenko, P. Garbuz, S.V. Shishkina, N.M. Voloshchuk, P.K. Mykhailiuk, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 20515–20521. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004183

  16. [16]

      A. Denisenko, P. Garbuz, N.M. Voloshchuk, et al., Nat. Chem. 15 (2023) 1155–1163. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01222-0

  17. [17]

      J.M. Posz, N. Sharma, P.A. Royalty, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 10142–10149. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c01557

  18. [18]

      T. Rigotti, T. Bach, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 8821–8825. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03606

  19. [19]

      L. Herter, I. Koutsopetras, L. Turelli, T. Fessard, C. Salomé, Org. Biomol. Chem. 20 (2022) 9108–9111. doi: 10.1039/d2ob01669a

  20. [20]

      M. Reinhold, J. Steinebach, C. Golz, J.C.L. Walker, Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 9885–9891. doi: 10.1039/d3sc03083k

  21. [21]

      R. Kleinmans, T. Pinkert, S. Dutta, et al., Nature 605 (2022) 477–482. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04636-x

  22. [22]

      Y. Liang, R. Kleinmans, C.G. Daniliuc, F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 20207–20213. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09248

  23. [23]

      Y. Liang, F. Paulus, C.G. Daniliuc, F. Glorius, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202305043. doi: 10.1002/anie.202305043

  24. [24]

      R. Kleinmans, S. Dutta, K. Ozols, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 12324–12332. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02961

  25. [25]

      R. Guo, Y.C. Chang, L. Herter, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 7988–7994. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02976

  26. [26]

      K. Dhake, K.J. Woelk, J. Becica, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202204719. doi: 10.1002/anie.202204719

  27. [27]

      M. Xu, Z. Wang, Z. Sun, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202214507. doi: 10.1002/anie.202214507

  28. [28]

      S. Agasti, F. Beltran, E. Pye, et al., Nat. Chem. 15 (2023) 535–541. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01135-y

  29. [29]

      Y. Liu, S. Lin, Y. Li, et al., ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 5096–5103. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00305

  30. [30]

      D. Ni, S. Hu, X. Tan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202308606. doi: 10.1002/anie.202308606

  31. [31]

      L. Tang, Y. Xiao, F. Wu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202310066. doi: 10.1002/anie.202310066

  32. [32]

      N. Radhoff, C.G. Daniliuc, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202304771. doi: 10.1002/anie.202304771

  33. [33]

      H.J. Böhm, D. Banner, S. Bendels, et al., ChemBioChem 5 (2004) 637–643. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200301023

  34. [34]

      D. O’Hagan, J. Fluorine Chem. 131 (2010) 1071–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2010.03.003

  35. [35]

      E.P. Gillis, K.J. Eastman, M.D. Hill, D.J. Donnelly, N.A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 58 (2015) 8315–8359. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00258

  36. [36]

      X. Ma, D.L. Sloman, Y. Han, D.J. Bennett, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 7199–7203. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02026

  37. [37]

      R. Bychek, P.K. Mykhailiuk, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202205103. doi: 10.1002/anie.202205103

  38. [38]

      J. Xie, J. Yu, M. Rudolph, F. Rominger, A.S.K. Hashmi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 9416–9421. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602347

  39. [39]

      C. Zhu, Y.F. Zhang, Z.Y. Liu, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 6721–6726. doi: 10.1039/c9sc01336a

  40. [40]

      H. Liu, L. Ge, D.X. Wang, N. Chen, C. Feng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 3918–3922. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814308

  41. [41]

      X. Yu, A. Maity, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202310288. doi: 10.1002/anie.202310288

  42. [42]

      E.W. Della, N.J. Head, J. Org. Chem. 57 (1992) 2850–2855. doi: 10.1021/jo00036a018

  43. [43]

      R.A. Correa, N. Jing, D.M. Lemal, J. Org. Chem. 58 (1993) 6406–6409. doi: 10.1021/jo00075a040

  44. [44]

      N. Jing, D.M. Lemal, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 8481–8482. doi: 10.1021/ja00071a081

  45. [45]

      A.N. Tkachenko, D.S. Radchenko, P.K. Mykhailiuk, O.O. Grygorenko, I.V. Komarov, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 5674–5676. doi: 10.1021/ol902381w

  46. [46]

      M.M. Sun, H. Liu, C. Zhu, C. Feng, Synthesis (Mass) 54 (2022) 1108–1114. doi: 10.1055/a-1653-2685

  47. [47]

      C. Zhu, M.M. Sun, K. Chen, H. Liu, C. Feng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 20237–20242. doi: 10.1002/anie.202106531

  48. [48]

      L. Li, T. Xiao, H. Chen, L. Zhou, Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 2249–2254. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605919

  49. [49]

      Z. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. He, X. Shen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202303218. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303218

  50. [50]

      Y. Zhang, Y. Niu, Y. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202212201. doi: 10.1002/anie.202212201

  51. [51]

      S.J. Chapman, W.B. Swords, C.M. Le, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 4206–4213. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c00063

  52. [52]

      F. Pecho, Y.Q. Zou, J. Gramüller, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 5190–5194. doi: 10.1002/chem.202000720

  53. [53]

      K. Fukui, Acc. Chem. Res. 4 (1971) 57–64. doi: 10.1021/ar50038a003

  54. [54]

      K.N. Houk, Acc. Chem. Res. 8 (1975) 361–369. doi: 10.1021/ar50095a001

  55. [55]

      M.E. Daub, H. Jung, B.J. Lee, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 9543–9547. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04643

  56. [56]

      E.M. Sherbrook, M.J. Genzink, B. Park, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 5735. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25878-9

• 

  Figure 1  State-of-arts for construction of bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 5,5-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.002 mmol, 1 mol%) in DMSO or DCM (0.3 mL) was irradiated under Blue LEDs (460 nm) at room temperature. ^aA telescoped procedure was used and overall yield of two steps was indicated. ^bIr(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(dtbbpy)(PF₆) was used instead of Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 2,2-difluorobicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.002 mmol, 1 mol%) in DMSO or DCM (0.3 mL) was irradiated under blue LEDs (460 nm) at room temperature.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Synthetic application of diF-BCHs. (a) Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.5 mol%), blue LEDs (460 nm, 20 W), DMSO (6 mL), r.t. (b) RuO₂·H₂O (10 mol%), NaIO₄ (8.0 equiv.), MeCN/H₂O (15 mL, 3:2), r.t. (c) 1. Ph₂P(=O)N₃ (1.5 equiv.), Et₃N (1.4 equiv.), THF (2 mL), reflux; 2. pyrrolidine (3.0 equiv.), reflux. (d) Pd/C (10 wt%), H₂ (1 atm), EtOAc (1 mL). (e) 2v (1.2 equiv.), Pd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%), PPh₃ (20 mol%), 2-iodoaniline (1.0 equiv.), TABCl (1.0 equiv.), Na₂SO₄ (5.0 equiv.), DMF (2.0 mL), 95 ℃. (f) Ir(dF(CF₃)ppy)₂(bpy)(PF₆) (0.5 mol%), blue LEDs (460 nm, 15 W), DMSO (8 mL), r.t. (g) 1. RuO₂·H₂O (10 mol%), NaIO₄ (8.0 equiv.), MeCN/H₂O (15 mL, 3:2), r.t.; 2. NaOH (5.0 equiv.), THF/H₂O (30 mL, 1:1). (h) 1. SOCl₂ (8.0 equiv.), DMF (cat.), DCM (20 mL), 40 ℃; 2. 2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide (3.0 equiv.), CF₃CH₂I (10.0 equiv.), DMAP (7 mol%), DCM (60 mL), 40 ℃.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  Mechanistic investigations.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Evaluation of fluorine effects.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  下载: 导出CSV
•