Constructing the synergistic active sites of nickel bicarbonate supported Pt hierarchical nanostructure for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction

Weiping Xiao Yuhang Chen Qin Zhao Danil Bukhvalov Caiqin Wang Xiaofei Yang

Citation:  Weiping Xiao, Yuhang Chen, Qin Zhao, Danil Bukhvalov, Caiqin Wang, Xiaofei Yang. Constructing the synergistic active sites of nickel bicarbonate supported Pt hierarchical nanostructure for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 110176. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110176 shu

Constructing the synergistic active sites of nickel bicarbonate supported Pt hierarchical nanostructure for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction

English

  • Hydrogen, as a clean energy carrier for fuel cells, has aroused great attention for its reproducibility and zero-carbon emission. The electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) from water splitting is a crucial method for obtaining hydrogen energy. However, it often involves complex reaction pathways, presents additional energy barriers, and consequently exhibits sluggish reaction kinetics [1-5]. To enhance the kinetics, the catalysts are essential and the mechanism of the HER is needed to be understood. In acidic medium, the reaction (2H+ → H2) is straightforward and verified by Sabatier's principle and Butler-Volmer equation. The binding energies of hydrogen at the active sites on the catalyst surface are responsible for the HER activities. The catalysts, such as Pt and Ir, with moderate hydrogen adsorption strength (ΔGH* close to 0 V) could, consequently, give rise to the optimal catalytic HER activity [6-9]. On the contrary, in alkaline medium, it is still debatable why the reaction kinetics of the catalysts including Pt-group metals are two to three orders of magnitude slower and more sensitive to the catalysts' surface structure than in acid solution [10,11]. Numerous studies have reported the existence of volcano-shaped curves correlating HER activities with the binding energy of hydrogen in alkaline media. This observation, in accordance with Sabatier's principle, suggests the presence of an optimal binding energy for hydrogen [12-15]. Research regarding the HER/HOR activities of Pt-group metal catalysts has shown that these activities are primarily influenced by the binding energy of hydrogen and are minimally correlated to the adsorption of hydroxide. Accordingly, to enhance the HER performance of Pt-based materials, alloy methods have been adopted to optimize the binding energy of hydrogen, and under the circumstances, the second metal such as Ru is underneath rather than on the Pt surface [16,17]. The second metal, such as Ru or Ni, on the surface could promote the adsorption of hydroxide but the enhanced performance can hardly be explained as an oxyphilic effect [18-20].

    However, an increasing number of experimental and theoretical research papers have indicated that the adsorption of hydroxide also affects the HER kinetics [21-23]. This requires the second active site to adsorb hydroxide and promotes H2O dissociation, which consequently enhances the HER kinetics [24]. The alkaline HER/HOR activities of Pt-Ru alloy catalysts were much higher than the commercial Pt/C, which was partly due to the stronger adsorption of hydroxide [25]. This alloy metal makes it still uncertain how the second metal affects the HER kinetics of Pt-based compound from the theoretical research since the binding energy of hydroxide is untoward to calculation by density functional theory. Moreover, Pt-metal supported composites are increasingly gaining attention in research as potential substitutes for alloying catalysts [26]. This is due to their advantages such as high utilization of noble metal atoms and robust Pt-support interactions. The support material can not only disperse and anchor Pt particles to enhance the stability but also can serve as active sites for hydroxyl species adsorption. These synergistic active sites can concurrently increase catalytic activity and stability. For example, Ni(OH)2-Pt manifests an enhancement of HER performance relative to state-of-the-art Pt catalyst, ascribing to the Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles on Pt electrode surfaces could induce the dissociation of H2O [23]. Hence, by constructing Pt supported hierarchical nanostructure based on bi-functional mechanism, the Pt and carriers have synergistic active sites to adsorb the species of hydrogen and hydroxyl, respectively, which facilitate to the break of O–H in H2O molecules, and could simultaneously boost catalytic activity and stability. However, most of the research is focused on the development of supports with single active site. Compared with single active site, the multiple active sites could exhibit various adsorption strengths of hydroxyl group and it may bring further improvement to the electrocatalytic performance.

    Based on the above analysis, the synergistic active sites were constructed to regulate the migration of intermediate species in the process of HER in alkaline solution. The support with the ability to adsorb the hydroxide were employed as Ni(HCO3)2 (namely NHC) nanoplates, which includes interfacial sites of Ni-terminated NiO, NiOOH, NiCOO, and Ni(OH)2. When compounding Pt with NHC to forming NHC-Pt, Pt could act as the hydrogen adsorption active sites and obtain the synergistic active sites for HER catalysis. The uniformly distributed NHC nanoplates could provide an ideal platform for Pt nanoparticles (NPs) to be uniformly dispersed, making sure that the maximum exposure of active sites. The NHC-Pt hierarchical nanostructure exhibits enhanced electrochemical active surface area and preferable activities toward HER in pH-universal solution, which could be originated from the synergistic effect between the NHC carrier and Pt nanoparticles. The density functional theory (DFT) based simulations have been carried out to reveal the pathways and energetics of performed reactions. This tendency found in our modeling provides the possibility for further guiding the design of Pt hierarchical nanostructure with synergistic active sites for HER in alkaline media.

    The NHC-Pt-3 compound was prepared by anchoring Pt-based nanoparticles to NHC nanoplates via a facile two-step method. In detail, two-dimensional NHC nanoplates were firstly synthesized by a simple solvothermal reaction, which was used as a template to load and disperse the Pt nanoparticles. The synthesized NHC and H2PtCl6 solution were dispersed in ethylene glycol solution maintaining at 120 ℃ for 2 h under oil bath which resulted in the Pt nanoparticles in-situ grown on NHC nanoplates, defined as NHC-Pt. By adjusting the mass ratio of Pt and NHC-Pt to 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, the NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3, NHC-Pt-5 were prepared, respectively.

    Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of NHC-Pt-3 showed the obtained nanoplates distributed isolated with a diameter of 31−49 nm (Fig. 1a, Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting information). Furthermore, AFM measurement indicated that the average thickness of the Ni(HCO3)2 nanosheets was ~13 nm (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). The Pt nanoparticles were evenly distributed on the nanoplates, with sizes ranging from 1 nm to 3 nm (Fig. 1b, Figs. S4 and S5 Supporting information). This distribution suggests that the NHC could mitigate the aggregation of Pt nanoparticles to some extent. High-angle annular dark-field transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-TEM) showed the lattice fringes of NHC and Pt. The interplanar spacing was calculated to be 0.593 nm, corresponding to the (110) crystal face of NHC (Fig. 1c). While the lattice spacing of 0.225 nm was relevant to the (111) crystal face of Pt nanoparticles (Fig. 1d). The HAADF-STEM image and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping of NHC-Pt-3 confirms that the Ni, O elements were well distributed throughout the nanoplate while the Pt atoms are scattered dispersed on the Ni(HCO3)2 nanoplates, indicating the loading of Pt was relatively low (Fig. 1e). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns give further evidence for the small particles of Pt for the absent characteristic peaks of Pt (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). The inductively-coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) was carried out as shown in Table S1 (Supporting information) and the weight percent of Pt for NHC-Pt-3 is 15.2%.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Structural characterization. TEM image of NHC-Pt-3 at the scale bar of (a) 100 nm and (b) 20 nm. (c, d) HAADF-TEM images of NHC-Pt-3 nanomaterials. (e) HAADF-STEM image and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping of NHC-Pt-3.

    The chemical states and surface electronic structure of NHC-Pt-3 were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and compared with NHC and Pt/C. The XPS spectrum of Ni 2p3/2 peaks for NHC-Pt-3 are located at 855.96 eV and 857.46 eV, ascribing to the Ni2+ and Ni3+ of Ni 2p (Fig. 2a) [27]. The high resolution XPS Pt 4f spectrum of NHC-Pt-3 was shown in Fig. 2b and it displayed two pairs of peaks located at 70.92/74.32 eV and 72.01/75.71 eV, corresponding to the metallic Pt0 (4f7/2/4f5/2) and Pt2+ (4f7/2/4f5/2) [27]. The binding energies of Pt 4f on the NHC-Pt-3 catalyst is notably higher than that of the Pt/C catalyst. This indicates a downshift of the d-band center of Pt and a robust electronic interaction between the NHC and Pt atoms. Such interactions could lower the hydrogen binding energy and promote the kinetics of hydrogen evolution reaction [28]. The another peak at 68.8 eV was assigned to Ni2+ 3p of Ni(HCO3)2 [29]. The C 1s spectrum of NHC-Pt-3 catalyst showed four peaks at 290.15, 288.88, 285.95 and 284.80 eV, corresponding to the –HCO3, O–C═O, C–O and C–C/C–H, respectively [30,31]. The binding energy of O–C═O, C–O shifted to negative position for 0.23 eV and 0.35 eV relative to the pristine NHC (Fig. 2c). Meanwhile, the O 1s peak for O–C═O shifted to higher binding energy after compositing NHC with Pt, providing further evidence for the formation of Pt–O–C═O and electronic transform from Pt to NHC (Fig. 2d) [32,33]. The X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) were conducted and the results were analyzed to in-depth understanding the chemical states and bonding situation of Pt before and after combination with NHC carrier. Fig. 2e compared the Pt L-edge XANES of NHC-Pt-3 and Pt-foil. It could be seen that the XANES edge data of NHC-Pt-3 presented a higher energy shift relative to Pt-foil, indicating the existence of higher oxidation state of Pt and the electrons transform from Pt to NHC in NHC-Pt-3 compound [34]. This phenomenon is in accordance with the XPS analysis that the binding energy of Pt shifts positive after accord with NHC. Fig. 2f displayed the Pt L-edge EXAFS of NHC-Pt-3 and Pt-foil. The peak position located at 2.5 Å in Pt-foil are corresponding to the Pt-Pt bonding, which shifted to the lower value and weaker intensity in NHC-Pt-3 compound, suggesting the bond strength of Pt-Pt coordination is weaker in NHC-Pt-3 compared with that in Pt-foil [35]. The NHC-Pt-3 compound also showed a peak at 1.6 Å corresponding to Pt-O coordination [36,37], absent in the curve of Pt-foil, indicating the bonding of Pt and O and strong interaction between Pt and NHC. This could regulate the chemical state and electronic structure of Pt, thereby decrease the hydrogen binding energy and further optimize the HER catalytic activity of the NHC-Pt [32].

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  The XPS spectra of (a) Ni 2p, (b) Pt 4f, (c) C 1s and (d) O 1s on the surface of NHC-Pt-3 and NHC or Pt/C. Pt L-edge (e) XANES spectra and (f) EXAFS spectra of Pt foil and NHC-Pt-3, respectively.

    The electrocatalytic performances toward HER of the NHC, NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 samples were evaluated and compared in 1 mol/L KOH, 1 mol/L PBS and 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 solution. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of different catalysts were conducted from 0.1 V to −0.5 V at 5 mV/s in 1 mol/L KOH aqueous solution (Fig. 3a). The current densities of different samples were enhanced with the increase of overpotential. The current density enhanced gradually for NHC samples while it increased dramatically for NHC-Pt compound samples. The NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 required an overpotential of 289 mV, 121 mV, 51 mV and 37 mV to obtain a current density of 10 mA/cm2, indicating the HER activities were enhanced with the increasing of the Pt loading. The overpotential of NHC-Pt-2, Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 are much smaller than that of Pt/C (122 mV). The corresponding Tafel slopes of NHC, NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 achieves 1194.3, 117.6, 66.0, 37.2 and 30.6 mV/dec, respectively (Fig. 3b), demonstrating more favorable kinetics on the NHC-Pt samples relative to the bare NHC carrier. This HER performance is comparable to the reported materials in the literature for the values of overpotentials and Tafel slopes (Table S2 in Supporting information). In 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and 1 mol/L PBS electrolyte solution, the LSV curves (Figs. 3c and d) reveal that NHC is absolutely inert for HER, contrary to the fact that NHC-Pt samples exhibit much enhanced electrochemical catalytic activity in spite of the relatively low loading of Pt. The HER performance of NHC-Pt-3 is much higher than that of Pt/C in 1 mol/L KOH and 1 mol/L PBS (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). Meanwhile, Tafel plots of different samples in Figs. S8 and S9 (Supporting information) also showed that the evolvement of their value uncovers the improved catalytic kinetics with the increase of Pt loading in neutral-pH and acid media. It could be ascribed to that Pt nanoparticles serve as abundant active centers to accelerate HER kinetics and high Pt mass loading contributes to the enhanced HER activities. Furthermore, the mass activity of NHC-Pt samples normalized to the Pt loading at 0.05 V in 1 mol/L PBS, 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and 1 mol/L KOH electrolytes, respectively (Fig. 3e and Fig. S10 in Supporting information). The specific activities (SA) according to the CV curves were calculated and the SA of NHC-Pt-3 is 0.494 A/m2, which is much higher than that of Pt/C (0.287 A/m2) at −0.1 V in 1 mol/L KOH electrolytes (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). In spite of the fact that the improvement of HER performance is in line with the increasing of Pt loadings, the mass activity of NHC-Pt-3 exceeds that of other NHC-Pt series catalysts. This indicates that the usage of Pt in the NHC-Pt-3 sample is the highest in a pH-universal solution. Furthermore, the electrical double-layered capacitance (Cdl) of different materials were evaluated according to the slope of the curves which plotted the (jajc)/2 with scan rate (ja, anodic current density; jc, cathodic current density). The ja and jc were obtained from the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at 0.5 V in the non-Faraday region. It can be seen from the CV curves that the current density was enhanced with the increasing of the scan rate for all the tested catalysts (Fig. S12 in Supporting information). As a result, the calculated Cdl data were enhanced in accordance with the Pt loading and the NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 showed the similar values, indicating that more exposed active sites and enhanced HER performance.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Electrocatalytic performances of the catalysts for HER. (a) The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of Pt/C, NHC, NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 samples tested in 1 mol/L KOH. (b) The corresponding Tafel plots. LSV curves of different samples in (c) 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and (d) 1 mol/L PBS solution. (e) Mass activities of NHC-Pt at overpotential of 0.05 V in KOH, H2SO4 and PBS solution. (f) The LSV curves of the NHC-Pt-3 sample before and after chronoamperometry test in 1 mol/L KOH, 1 mol/L PBS and 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 solution.

    Moreover, the long-term stability test was carried out by chronoamperometry curves at the constant potential which was corresponding to the current density of 10 mA/cm2 at LSV curves. Fig. S13 (Supporting information) showed the chronoamperometry curves of the NHC-Pt-3 composite for 10 h in KOH, H2SO4 and PBS solution. The current density went down at first and then maintained at a certain value. The LSV curves before and after durable test were shown in Fig. 3f, where the current densities of the samples decreased slightly after 10 h of continuous reaction. The overpotentials showed slight enhancement after durable test in pH-universal environment, indicating the relatively stable of NHC-Pt-3 compound (Fig. S14 in Supporting information). The TEM images were conducted to analyze the morphological changes before and after stabilization as shown in Fig. S15 (Supporting information). It can be seen that the NHC was still retained its original structure and the size of the nanosheet is increased. The Pt nanoparticles were still distributed uniformly on NHC surface after 10 h stabilization.

    The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were employed to unravel the mechanism of hydrogen production and the interaction between Pt and NHC carrier in NHC-Pt for efficient HER. For the modeling of catalytic activity of NHC-Pt co-catalyst, we take realistic structure of this material (Fig. 4a). Both XPS measurements (Fig. 2a) and the relative reference have evidenced the instability of Ni(HCO3)2 to a certain degree and reveals the presence of multiple interface areas [38,39]. These Ni-centers in different states were located and we used different Ni-based compounds to simulate these areas. In other words, a catalytic substrate can be described as a system of multiple horizontal interfaces. Thus, migration of the hydroxyl group occurs on neighboring active sites across these interfaces from the active sites of one Ni-based compound to the active site of another compound. Thus we will also consider other Ni-based structures such as Ni-terminated (111) surface of NiO (Fig. 4b), which is discussed as one decomposition product of Ni(HCO3)2, and (001) surfaces of NOOH, NiCOO and Ni(OH)2 (Figs. 4ce). Note that atomic structure of these Ni-based compounds can also be a proper model of multiple facets of Ni(HCO)3 and NiOOH can also be used as a model of oxygen-terminated surface of NiO. The next step after choosing the proper model is the choosing of reaction pathways.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Optimized atomic structure of (001) surface of Ni(HCO3)2 (a), Ni-terminated (111) surface of NiO (b), (001) surfaces of NiOOH (c), NiCOO (d) and Ni(OH)2 (e) with adsorbed hydroxyl group. On panels (a-e) nickel atoms are shown in green, oxygen in red, carbon in black, and hydrogen in cyan. On the panel (f) shown free energy diagram of the adsorption (red line), desorption (black lines) and migration of hydroxyl group over considered substrates (green line, see text), the letters of panel (f) are corresponding with the structures reported on panels (a-e). (g) Schematic diagram of the possible pathways of electrocatalytic water splitting according to the DFT calculations.

    In contrast to the HER in acidic media where the first step is unambiguous (Eq. 1):

    (1)

    where "c" is notation for catalyst, in alkaline media this first step can be realized via three different routes (Eqs. 2a-c):

    (2a)

    (2b)

    (2c)

    where c1 and c2 are different co-catalyst located in close proximity (Figs. 1c and d). The first route (Eq. 2a) is the least energetically favorable due to high energy cost of the formation of free OH group (Fig. 4f). In other steps, this energy is reduced to the intermediate adsorption of hydroxyl group on other site of the same catalyst that already interacts with hydrogen (Eq. 2b) or on other catalyst (co-catalyst, Eq. 2c). Note that the reaction shown in Eq. 2b requires simultaneous reduction and oxidation of the same catalyst and hence can be discussed only for alloys which have different active sites. Note that potential irreversible oxidation of active sites Eq. 2b can limit the performance of the catalyst over time. Resent successes in employment of co-catalyst for HER in alkaline media suggest preferred ability of the third route. In all three pathways of (Eqs. 2a–c) adsorption of hydrogen on catalyst is similar to the Volmer step of HER in acidic media (Eq. 1). Therefore, further evolution of hydrogen on Pt surface will be realized through the Heyrovsky step (Eq. 3):

    (3)

    This process has been discussed in previous works and the energy cost of this step is about 0.1 eV [40,41] which is much smaller than the magnitudes of the energies corresponding with hydroxyl group (Fig. 4f and Fig. S16 in Supporting information). Hence hydroxyl related processes determine the reaction rates in HER in alkaline media.

    Based on discussions above we performed calculations of the energetics of the adsorption of hydroxyl groups after water decomposition (Eq. 2c) on various substrates. These energies also determine the energy of desorption of hydroxyl groups from the substrates (Eq. 4):

    (4)

    In results of the calculations, we have found a large deviation of the magnitudes of desorption energies. The adsorption energy in the case of Ni(HCO)3 is moderate and negative while it is also negative but with larger magnitude in the case of NiO. Thus we should rule out NiO from further consideration because adsorption of hydroxyl groups on the nickel oxide surface leads to irreversible oxidation of the surface and formation of NOOH-like structure with Ni(III). Taking into account experimental evidences of the atomic oxygen migration over surfaces of metals, oxides and perovskites even at moderate temperatures [42-44], Eq. 4 can be rewritten as the chain of reactions (Eq. 5):

    (5)

    Eq. 5 describes a migration of hydroxyl group from one Ni-based substrate to other with the magnitude of the energy cost of the reaction much smaller than for hydroxyl group desorption until the energy cost of former process became negligible (Fig. 4f). This process of gradual migration and finally desorption of hydroxyl group with involving of all considered Ni-based systems (except NiO) can be described by further way: Ni(HCO3)2···OH (Fig. 4a) → NiOOH···OH (Fig. 4c) → NiCOO···OH (Fig. 4d) → Ni(OH)2···OH (Fig. 4e)→ OH. The formation of the robust Ni-OH bonds leads to the favorability of the initial step of the process corresponding with Eq. 2c and step marked by letter "a" on Fig. 4f. Further formation of weaker Ni-O-OH bond requires payment of the moderate energy costs (steps marked by letter "c" and "d" on Fig. 4f) with further migration of hydroxyl group to Ni(OH)2 host with formation of rather weak hydrogen bonds with Ni–OH–Ni bridges. At the last step of the process hydroxyl group desorbed from Ni(OH)2 substrate is almost barrierless. Thus Ni(OH)2 can be described as the final destination in the process of hydroxyl groups migration over the mix of considered Ni-based structures.

    Note that the proposed three step migration process is the only pathway corresponding with involving of all considered Ni-based structure. Since the local combinations of the Ni-based structure are definitively different, the steps of migration of the hydroxyl group from Ni(HCO3)2 to Ni(OH)2 is also different. However, the energy costs of each step of the migration are smaller than the energy of hydroxyl group desorption. Even in straightforward migration of the hydroxyl group from Ni(HCO3)2 to Ni(OH)2 is about 0.4 eV more energetically favorable than desorption of the hydroxyl group from Ni(HCO3)2. Thus possible migration pathways can be realized in different parts of the same catalysts and the possible pathways of electrocatalytic water splitting are shown in Fig. 4g. The synergetic effect of Pt and mix of Ni-based systems found in our modeling makes possible further guided devise of composite co-catalysts for HER in alkaline media.

    In conclusion, the alkaline performance improvement mechanism of HER was explored by NHC-Pt hierarchical nanostructure based on theoretical and experimental research. The NHC could affect the chemical state and electronic structure of Pt nanoparticles, which could reduce the reaction energy barriers, facilitate the adsorption of hydrogen and establish H–H bond. Moreover, DFT calculations reveal that the related process of hydroxide is the rate-determining step in the alkaline medium. The process of hydroxyl group desorption can be described as gradual migration from Ni(HCO3)2···OH directly or via other Ni-based systems to Ni(OH)2···OH where the hydroxyl group desorbed almost barrierless. As a result, the hierarchical nanostructure of NHC-Pt-5 demonstrated an overpotential of 37 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA/cm2 and mass activities of 2.6 A/mgPt at 0.05 V in a 1 mol/L KOH solution. This performance could be originated from the cooperative adsorption of hydrogen and hydroxyl on NHC-Pt with synergistic active sites. This work provided a new avenue to design the hierarchical nanostructure catalysts with enhanced HER performance by constructing the synergistic active sites.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Weiping Xiao: Writing – original draft, Validation, Software, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yuhang Chen: Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis. Qin Zhao: Software, Formal analysis. Danil Bukhvalov: Formal analysis, Data curation. Caiqin Wang: Investigation, Formal analysis. Xiaofei Yang: Supervision, Funding acquisition.

    This work is supported from Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Nanjing Forestry University (No. JC2019002).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110176.


    1. [1]

      R. Wu, J. Xu, C.L. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37641-3

    2. [2]

      L. Yang, R. Grzeschik, P. Jiang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) 202302126. doi: 10.1002/anie.202302126

    3. [3]

      Y. Zhu, K. Fan, C.S. Hsu, et al., Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 2301133. doi: 10.1002/adma.202301133

    4. [4]

      Q. Li, Y. Gao, M. Liu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 646 (2023) 391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.065

    5. [5]

      Y. Lai, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 435 (2022) 135102. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135102

    6. [6]

      K. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Jiang, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2424. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38018-2

    7. [7]

      M. Cococcioni, S. de Gironcoli, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 035105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105

    8. [8]

      Z. Wu, P. Yang, Q. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) 202300406. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300406

    9. [9]

      P. Wang, Y. Yan, P. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 455 (2023) 140856. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140856

    10. [10]

      J. Durst, A. Siebel, C. Simon, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014) 2255–2260. doi: 10.1039/C4EE00440J

    11. [11]

      T.J. Schmidt, P.N. Ross, N.M. Markovic, J. Electroanal. Chem. 524–525 (2002) 252–260.

    12. [12]

      W. Sheng, M. Myint, J.G. Chen, Y. Yan, Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (2013) 1509–1512. doi: 10.1039/c3ee00045a

    13. [13]

      F. Li, G.F. Han, H.J. Noh, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 4060. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12012-z

    14. [14]

      W. Sheng, Z. Zhuang, M. Gao, et al., Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 5848. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6848

    15. [15]

      J. Zheng, W. Sheng, Z. Zhuang, B. Xu, Y. Yan, Sci. Adv. 2 (2016) 1501602. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501602

    16. [16]

      K. Elbert, J. Hu, Z. Ma, et al., ACS Catal. 5 (2015) 6764–6772. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01670

    17. [17]

      S. Xu, M. Niu, G. Zhao, et al., Nano Res. 16 (2023) 6212–6219. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-5250-1

    18. [18]

      S. Lu, Z. Zhuang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5156–5163. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00765

    19. [19]

      Y. Wang, G. Wang, G. Li, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2014) 177–181.

    20. [20]

      L. Wang, H.N. Liu, X. Meng, et al., Rare Met. 43 (2024) 2851–2858. doi: 10.1007/s12598-024-02642-8

    21. [21]

      J. Dai, Y. Zhu, H.A. Tahini, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 5657. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19433-1

    22. [22]

      I.T. McCrum, M.T.M. Koper, Nat. Energy 5 (2020) 891–899. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00710-8

    23. [23]

      R. Subbaraman, D. Tripkovic, D. Strmcnik, et al., Science 334 (2011) 1256–1260. doi: 10.1126/science.1211934

    24. [24]

      E. Liu, J. Li, L. Jiao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 3232–3239. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13228

    25. [25]

      D. Strmcnik, M. Uchimura, C. Wang, et al., Nat. Chem. 5 (2013) 300–306. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1574

    26. [26]

      M.Y. Fan, J.J. Wang, J. Zhao, et al., Rare Met. 43 (2024) 1537–1546. doi: 10.1007/s12598-023-02553-0

    27. [27]

      B. Zhou, Y. Li, Y. Zou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 22908–22914. doi: 10.1002/anie.202109211

    28. [28]

      V.R. Stamenkovic, B.S. Mun, M. Arenz, et al., Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 241–247. doi: 10.1038/nmat1840

    29. [29]

      H. Yin, S. Zhao, K. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 6430. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7430

    30. [30]

      Y. Wei, G. Cheng, J. Xiong, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 5027–5038. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00417

    31. [31]

      S. Zhao, Z. Wang, Y. He, et al., ACS Energy Lett. 2 (2017) 111–116. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00582

    32. [32]

      M. Lao, K. Rui, G. Zhao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131 (2019) 5489–5491.

    33. [33]

      B. Muthukutty, T.C. Doan, H. Yoo, Environ. Res. 241 (2024) 117655. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117655

    34. [34]

      K.L. Zhou, C. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 13 (2020) 3082–3092. doi: 10.1039/D0EE01347A

    35. [35]

      B. Pang, X. Liu, T. Liu, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 15 (2022) 102–108. doi: 10.1039/D1EE02518J

    36. [36]

      J. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Guo, et al., Nat. Catal. 1 (2018) 985–992. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0195-1

    37. [37]

      C. Li, Z. Chen, H. Yi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 15902–15907. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005282

    38. [38]

      Y. Dong, Y. Ma, D. Li, et al., Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 8682–8691. doi: 10.1039/C8SC02868K

    39. [39]

      C. Rincke, S. Bette, R.E. Dinnebier, W. Voigt, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015 (2015) 5913–5920. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201501094

    40. [40]

      J. Greeley, T.F. Jaramillo, J. Bonde, I. Chorkendorff, J.K. Nørskov, Nat. Mater. 5 (2006) 909–913. doi: 10.1038/nmat1752

    41. [41]

      Y. Tang, B.L. Allen, D.R. Kauffman, A. Star, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 13200–13201. doi: 10.1021/ja904595t

    42. [42]

      C. Descorme, D. Duprez, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 202 (2000) 231–241. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00537-8

    43. [43]

      M. Colin, D. Duprez, M. Pélissier, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 112 (1997) 303–312.

    44. [44]

      L. Cao, O. Petracic, X.K. Wei, Small 17 (2021) 2104356. doi: 10.1002/smll.202104356

  • Figure 1  Structural characterization. TEM image of NHC-Pt-3 at the scale bar of (a) 100 nm and (b) 20 nm. (c, d) HAADF-TEM images of NHC-Pt-3 nanomaterials. (e) HAADF-STEM image and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping of NHC-Pt-3.

    Figure 2  The XPS spectra of (a) Ni 2p, (b) Pt 4f, (c) C 1s and (d) O 1s on the surface of NHC-Pt-3 and NHC or Pt/C. Pt L-edge (e) XANES spectra and (f) EXAFS spectra of Pt foil and NHC-Pt-3, respectively.

    Figure 3  Electrocatalytic performances of the catalysts for HER. (a) The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of Pt/C, NHC, NHC-Pt-1, NHC-Pt-2, NHC-Pt-3 and NHC-Pt-5 samples tested in 1 mol/L KOH. (b) The corresponding Tafel plots. LSV curves of different samples in (c) 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and (d) 1 mol/L PBS solution. (e) Mass activities of NHC-Pt at overpotential of 0.05 V in KOH, H2SO4 and PBS solution. (f) The LSV curves of the NHC-Pt-3 sample before and after chronoamperometry test in 1 mol/L KOH, 1 mol/L PBS and 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 solution.

    Figure 4  Optimized atomic structure of (001) surface of Ni(HCO3)2 (a), Ni-terminated (111) surface of NiO (b), (001) surfaces of NiOOH (c), NiCOO (d) and Ni(OH)2 (e) with adsorbed hydroxyl group. On panels (a-e) nickel atoms are shown in green, oxygen in red, carbon in black, and hydrogen in cyan. On the panel (f) shown free energy diagram of the adsorption (red line), desorption (black lines) and migration of hydroxyl group over considered substrates (green line, see text), the letters of panel (f) are corresponding with the structures reported on panels (a-e). (g) Schematic diagram of the possible pathways of electrocatalytic water splitting according to the DFT calculations.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  41
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2024-12-15
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-25
  • 接受日期:  2024-06-25
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-06-25
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章