Insight into the activation of peroxymonosulfate by N-doped copper-based carbon for efficient degradation of organic pollutants: Synergy of nonradicals

Mengmeng Ao Jian Wei Chuan-Shu He Heng Zhang Zhaokun Xiong Yonghui Song Bo Lai

Citation:  Mengmeng Ao, Jian Wei, Chuan-Shu He, Heng Zhang, Zhaokun Xiong, Yonghui Song, Bo Lai. Insight into the activation of peroxymonosulfate by N-doped copper-based carbon for efficient degradation of organic pollutants: Synergy of nonradicals[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 109882. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109882 shu

Insight into the activation of peroxymonosulfate by N-doped copper-based carbon for efficient degradation of organic pollutants: Synergy of nonradicals

English

  • The environmental impact of phenolic compounds has become a growing concern in recent years. The discharge of phenolic compounds has not only degraded the quality of ecosystems but also poses a significant risk to ecological stability and human health, as outlined in key environmental studies [1]. Phenolic compounds, characterized as a prevalent group of organic pollutants that resisted biodegradation, were found extensively in various industries, agricultural practices, and medical facilities. The frequent presence of phenolic compounds in aquatic systems has been extensively documented [2]. While these compounds have been instrumental in supporting the trajectory of rapid economic development, their adverse environmental effects have not gone unnoticed [3]. Notably, inherent high toxicity, resistance to natural degradation processes, and potential for bioaccumulation of phenolic compounds posed a dual threat: toxic and potentially carcinogenic to aquatic life and humans, even at low concentrations [4]. In light of these concerns, the advancement of effective technologies for the removal and complete mineralization of phenolic compounds from aquatic environments is crucial in promoting environmental sustainability.

    Among state-of-the-art wastewater treatment methodologies, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have emerged as pivotal techniques in decontaminating water resources for refractory pollutants. Within this spectrum, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) stands out as an oxidant that aligns with environmental sustainability and cost-effectiveness, distinguished by its solubility and stability in aqueous solutions. The activation of PMS is characterized by a diverse array of reaction pathways, which include both radical-driven and non-radical processes [5]. The conventional radical pathway predominantly involves the formation of hydroxyl radicals (OH) and sulfate radicals (SO4•‒). However, challenges arise in practical water treatment scenarios due to complex water matrices, which can adversely affect the catalytic effectiveness. Specifically, the produced OH/SO4•‒ tend to react with coexisting substances like inorganic iron and natural organic matter (NOM), leading to less potent oxidation by-products such as Cl2•− and CO3•−, thereby hindering their broader application [6]. In contrast, the non-radical pathways, encompassing processes like surface activation complexes, electron transfer, and the involvement of high-valent species and singlet oxygen (1O2), offer a balanced approach with moderate oxidation capabilities. These pathways demonstrate selectivity in contaminant degradation with a high level of resistance to typical radical quenchers, and maintain effectiveness across diverse pH conditions [7]. Recent studies have increasingly focused on the role of high-valent metals in degrading pollutants, particularly through the activation of persulfates. Notably, copper in its high-valent state, Cu(Ⅲ), which demonstrates a redox potential of 2.3 V for the Cu(Ⅲ)/Cu(Ⅱ) couple, has been observed to possess slightly higher effectiveness in comparison to other high-valent metals such as iron (with a redox potential of 2.2 V) and manganese (exhibiting a redox potential of 1.68 V) [8]. This underscores the potential of designing hetero-copper-based catalysts to optimize PMS activation to facilitate the production of Cu(Ⅲ). This approach is positioned as a forward-looking strategy in the realm of water treatment technologies.

    Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) consist of nodes containing metal elements and are interconnected by organic linkers [9]. Their expansive surface area, coupled with a finely tuned microporous structure and well-organized morphology, positions them as potential substitutes for conventional heterogeneous catalysts in environmental clean-up efforts [10]. Moreover, MOFs-derived carbon materials not only retain the framework of MOFs but also exhibit enhanced stability and electrical conductivity, and are widely investigated for the activation of PMS [11-13]. Specifically, zeolitic-imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) with unique topology and versatility in different metal centers are the most widely used precursors for the preparation of nitrogen-doped carbon.

    Therefore, we synthesized copper-based N-doped carbon (Cu-NC-20) by in situ doping of metallic copper in ZIF-8 and pyrolyzed under argon atmosphere. The research provided a new pathway for PMS activation with excellent degradation performance towards phenol (PE). Detailed analyses of the catalysts' morphology and surface characteristics were performed using a range of characterization techniques. In this research, essential reaction variables, such as namely initial pH, catalyst quantity, PMS concentration, and PE levels, were comprehensively explored. The predominant ROS in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system, identified as 1O2 and Cu(Ⅲ), were pinpointed through scavenging experiments, EPR analysis, and in-situ Raman spectroscopic techniques. Furthermore, the influence of coexisting ions and the impact on PE degradation in actual water samples were investigated, alongside evaluating the catalyst's recyclability for practical use. Most notably, the degradation behaviors of seven selected phenolic compounds were analyzed by QSAR. This provided insights into the selective oxidation capabilities of the Cu-NC-20/PMS system, particularly in relation to Hammett constants.

    Comprehensive investigations into the morphological characteristics of the materials, both prior to and following the pyrolysis process, were conducted. These analyses employed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. Initial observations, as depicted in Fig. S1 (Supporting information), indicated that the Cu-ZIF-20 samples were characterized by a distinct rhombic dodecahedral geometry, with the particle sizes predominantly falling within the 50–60 nm range. However, a significant transformation was observed post-pyrolysis treatment, conducted at a temperature of 900 ℃. This change, displayed in Fig. 1a, manifested as a notable decrease in particle size and an overall collapse in the structural integrity of the Cu-NC-20. This phenomenon was likely a consequence of the disintegration of the organic components within the framework during the high-temperature pyrolysis [14,15]. Further detailed analysis using TEM and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), as showcased in Figs. 1b and c, revealed a lack of extensive lattice fringes, thereby indicating the absence of highly crystalline structures of copper within the Cu-NC-20. In addition, the uniform distribution of various elements such as C, N, O, and Cu in the catalyst was confirmed through energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping (Fig. 1d), and corresponding contents were listed in Table S1 (Supporting information). The technique EDS provided a clear visualization of the elemental composition and indicated the homogeneity of C, N, O, and Cu. N2 adsorption-desorption tests showed that the BET surface area of N-C, Cu-NC-10, Cu-NC-20 and Cu-NC-40 was 972.23, 1127.54, 1169.84 and 1002.27 m2/g, respectively (Fig. 1e). Comparison of Fig. S2 (Supporting information) and Fig. 1a revealed that the catalyst particle size became smaller and more pores after metal doping, so the specific surface area increased with the increase of copper doping, but the difference in BET with the change of copper content was not significant. Fig. S3 (Supporting information) showed the pore size distribution in the range of 0.75–2.00 nm. The above results demonstrated that catalysts with large specific surface areas and microporous structure helped to promote mass transfer between pollutant and oxidant molecules.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  SEM images of (a) Cu-NC-20 and (b, c) TEM of Cu-NC-20. (d) Elemental mapping images of Cu-NC-20. (e) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (f) FTIR spectra of samples. XPS fitting results of (g) N 1s, (h) C 1s and (i) Cu 2p.

    X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed to examine the crystal structure of catalysts. As depicted in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), only two peaks (2θ = 25.7° and 43.5°) belonging to the (002) and (101) crystalline facets of graphitic carbon were found for all catalysts, suggesting that all catalysts were successfully converted to amorphous carbon from ZIF-8-derived precursors after pyrolysis. The introduction of a minimal quantity of copper into the samples did not lead to any discernible alterations in their crystalline structure, and there were no oxide crystalline facets in the structure. Furthermore, the extent of graphitization in these samples was assessed using Raman spectroscopy. As depicted in Fig. S5 (Supporting information), the Raman spectra exhibited two prominent peaks at 1338 cm−1 (D band) and 1590 cm−1 (G band), as indicative vibrations of sp2-bonded carbon atoms and structural defects, respectively [16-18]. Notably, the relative intensity ratio (ID/IG) remained relatively unchanged, suggesting that the incorporation of metallic copper did not significantly impact the degree of graphitization and the degree of defects in the material. The surface chemistry attributes of various samples were further analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), as shown in Fig. 1f. In this study, the FTIR spectroscopy results, aligning with the observations from XRD and Raman spectroscopy, indicated no significant changes were observed as the amount of Cu doping varied. The FTIR spectra exhibited a characteristic absorption band in the 3100 cm−1 to 3600 cm−1 regions. This specific band was interpreted as indicative of the stretching vibrations associated with hydroxyl (O–H) and amine (N–H) functional groups [19,20]. In the spectrum, the absorption range between 1200 cm−1 and 1660 cm−1 was attributed to the presence of nitrogen heteroatoms integrating into the sp² hybridized carbon lattice and the presence of C=C/C=O [21,22]. Additionally, the presence of a distinct absorption band in the 550-620 cm−1 region was identified as corresponding to the vibrational bonding patterns of Cu–N [23]. To further probe the surface chemical composition and the specific elemental states within the catalysts, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed. The detailed analysis of the high-resolution N 1s spectrum for the Cu-NC-20 sample revealed the presence of three distinct peaks as depicted in Fig. 1g. These peaks were classified as graphitic nitrogen at 401.03 eV, pyrrolic nitrogen at 399.77 eV, and pyridinic nitrogen at 398.45 eV. The latter, observed at 398.45 eV, was hypothesized to be closely associated with the bonding configurations involving Cu-N interactions [24]. Despite the subtle differences in binding energies made it challenging to distinctly identify Cu-N, the presence of Cu–N was further supported by the peaks in the 550–600 cm−1 range in the FTIR spectrum (Fig. 1f). The high-resolution C 1s spectrum, shown in Fig. 1h, was divided into two peaks corresponding to C–C (284.8 eV) and C-N/C–O (286.1 eV) bonds [25,26]. The Cu 2p high-resolution spectra in Fig. 1i revealed two primary peaks at 934.8 and 954.3 eV, identified as Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively, indicating the presence of copper in both Cu(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅰ) valence states, with contents of 86% and 14%, respectively (Fig. S13 in Supporting information). Collectively, these findings confirmed the successful synthesis of metallic copper-doped zeolitic imidazolate framework derivatives.

    Experimental observations illustrated in Fig. 2a indicate that using PMS alone had a minimal impact on phenol (PE) removal, accounting for less than 5% reduction. This suggested that PMS lacked substantial oxidizing capability for PE degradation, despite its high redox potential. Additionally, as shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information), all tested catalysts demonstrated limited adsorption efficiency towards PE, the maximum adsorption rate did not exceed 30%. Fig. 2b highlighted that the degradation rate was also only 38% after the addition of N-C without Cu atoms, and the addition of copper significantly enhanced the catalytic performance. Notably, Cu-NC-20 achieved complete degradation of PE within 10 min, exhibited the fastest kinetic rate constant (0.544 min−1) and the highest TOC removal rate (66%), and utilized nearly 100% of the PMS within the same duration (Figs. S7 and S14 in Supporting information). In addition, the reaction rate (KMCP, divide kobs by the content of metal, dosage of catalyst, and PMS) values of Cu-NC-20 were much higher than those of state-of-the-art heterogeneous catalysts reported recently (Fig. 2c and Table S2 in Supporting information). Consequently, Cu-NC-20 was identified as the optimal catalyst with a maximum value of kobs. To explore the copper ion leaching of different catalysts, shown in Fig. 2d, the addition of copper did lead to an increase in leaching. Moreover, the leached copper ions from Cu-NC-20 were measured at only 23 µg/L, which was significantly below the maximum permissible limit of 1.0 mg/L set by the Sanitary Standard for Drinking Water in China (GB5749–2006).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) The removal efficiency and (b) corresponding kobs of different catalysts, (c) comparison of KMCP values of different systems, (d) Cu leaching. Reaction condition: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, [catalyst] = 70 mg/L.

    A comprehensive study was conducted to assess the influence of various operational parameters on PE degradation within the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. These parameters included the quantities of catalyst and PMS, the pH value, and the PE concentration. As illustrated in Fig. 3a, an increase in the concentration of Cu-NC-20 from 30 mg/L to 100 mg/L was found to enhance the degradation efficiency markedly, from 76.0% to a complete 100% within 10 min. This enhancement in efficiency can be largely attributed to the increased availability of active sites for the activation of PMS, leading to a higher generation rate of reactive species with elevated catalyst concentrations. Nevertheless, the increment in catalyst dosage from 70 mg/L to 100 mg/L did not show a proportional increase in efficiency, which could be due to the limitations in diffusion arising from an overabundance of the catalyst in the system [27,28]. Consequently, 70 mg/L was identified as the optimal catalyst dosage for further experiments, because of balancing efficiency and cost considerations. The role of PMS concentration was also critical, as a primary source of active species in the degradation process. The increase of PMS concentration from 0.05 mmol/L to 0.25 mmol/L expedited PE degradation, as shown in Fig. 3b. However, elevating the PMS concentration to 0.35 mmol/L did not yield further improvement, possibly due to saturation of the activation sites [29,30]. Consequently, an optimal concentration of 0.25 mmol/L for PMS was established. The effectiveness of Fenton and Fenton-like processes was well-known to be heavily influenced by pH levels, presenting challenges for their widespread practical use. This sensitivity has made the regulation of pH a critical aspect in applications involving persulfate activation [31,32]. The influence of pH in Cu-NC-20/PMS system was investigated in Fig. 3c. The high efficiency in PE removal across a broad pH spectrum ranging from 3 to 9 was remarkable. It was noteworthy that there was no significant variance in the removal efficiency between acidic and alkaline environments. This makes the Cu-NC-20/PMS system have a wide range of prospects in practical applications. Additionally, as illustrated in Fig. 3d, while an increase in PE concentration slightly reduced the degradation rate, the system still achieved an impressive 84.2% removal efficiency at a PE concentration of 10 mg/L.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Influence of (a) catalyst amount, (b) PMS quantity, (c) pH levels, and (d) PE concentrations on PE degradation through Cu-NC-20/PMS. Reaction conditions: [PE] at 5 mg/L for (a), (b), (c); [PMS] at 0.25 mmol/L for (a), (c), (d); catalyst presence at 70 mg/L for (b), (c), (d).

    In the Cu-NC-20/PMS reaction system, two specific radical scavengers, MeOH and TBA, were employed to investigate the potential involvement of SO4•‒ and OH. Detailed rate constants, provided in Table S3 (Supporting information), revealed MeOH could quench both types of radicals, whereas TBA showed a preferential affinity for quenching OH only. Experimental data presented in Figs. 4a and b demonstrated that even significant variations in the ratios of MeOH and TBA, from 100:1 to 1000:1, did not markedly alter the degradation efficiency of PE. This outcome implied that neither SO4•‒ nor OH radicals played a major role in the degradation process within Cu-NC-20/PMS system. Furthermore, SOD and BQ were introduced as probes to investigate the presence of O2•− radicals. As indicated in Fig. 4c and Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the negligible impact of these scavengers suggested that O2•− was not a predominant reactive oxygen species in the reaction milieu. Complementing these findings, an EPR study utilizing DMPO as a trapping agent was conducted. The results showed an absence of typical signals associated with DMPO-OH or DMPO-SO4•‒ adducts (Fig. 4d). Instead, the dominant presence of a DMPOX signal was noted, which was indicative of the rapid oxidation of DMPO. This observation lent support to the hypothesis that non-radical mechanisms might be significantly contributing to the overall reaction process in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Impact of varying concentrations of (a) MeOH, (b) TBA, (c) SOD on PE degradation, (d) EPR spectra in Cu-NC-20/PMS, DMPO as trapping agent, (e) influence of varied FFA concentrations on PE degradation, (f) EPR spectra in Cu-NC-20/PMS, TEMP as trapping agent. Reaction conditions: [PE] at 5 mg/L, [PMS] at 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst presence at 70 mg/L, [DMPO] at 20 mmol/L, [TEMP] at 20 mmol/L.

    Previous studies had reported that 1O2 was generated during PMS activation, and the role of 1O2 was explored using furfuryl alcohol (FFA) as the quenching agent. As displayed in Fig. 4e, the addition of FFA effectively suppressed the degradation of PE and the suppression was found to be enhanced with the increase in FFA concentration. The addition of both sodium azide (NaN3) and l-histidine to the system showed a strong inhibition [33]. Observable suppressive effects were recorded in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system with the addition of NaN3 and l-histidine, as illustrated in Fig. S9a (Supporting information). This addition led to a noticeable reduction in the system's efficiency for degrading PE. Furthermore, as depicted in Fig. S9b (Supporting information), the degradation of PE in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system was more effective in D2O than in H2O. This enhancement in D2O suggested an elevated effectiveness of the system, largely driven by the activity of 1O2. The findings collectively highlighted the crucial role of 1O2 in the degradation process within the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. The EPR spectrum of Fig. 4f showed the appearance of a similar three-line signal (1:1:1) for the TEMPN adduct, and no significant signal was detected by only PMS. Notably, the TEMPN signal intensity increased significantly with increasing reaction time, indicating that Cu-NC-20 could activate PMS to generate 1O2.

    Recent advancements in the field have highlighted catalyst-mediated organic contaminant degradation via direct electron transfer mechanisms, bypassing the need for ROS involvement [34]. Consequently, this underscored the importance of investigating the presence and efficacy of electron transfer pathways specifically in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. It was assumed that organic contaminants could be transferred to sub-stable complexes through the catalyst and PMS, leading to the degradation of contaminants. PMS remained stable in catalyst solutions without organic contaminants, but when organic contaminants were introduced, PMS decomposed to degrade the contaminants. That indicated the organic contaminant was the initiator of PMS activation [35,36]. An analysis was carried out to assess the impact of combining Cu-NC-20 with PMS before the treatment of PE. As indicated in Fig. 5a, premixing these two components led to a noticeable reduction in the effectiveness of the PE oxidation process. This reduction became more pronounced with an increase in the premixing duration, suggesting that the role of PMS in degrading PE was predominantly through the activation of the catalyst. Concurrently, the depletion of PMS in the Cu-NC-20 system was investigated, both in the presence and absence of PE. Fig. S10 (Supporting information) illustrated that the PMS concentration declined at a similar rate irrespective of the presence or absence of PE. These findings collectively implied that the conventional electron transfer mechanism was not the predominant pathway in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) The degradation efficiency of PE after premixing Cu-NC-20 with PMS, (b) the amperometric i-t curve of the reaction at 0.0 V, (c) the in-situ Raman patterns of Cu-NC-20, (d) and the kobs of adding DMP in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. Reaction conditions: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L, [DMP] = 0.05 mmol/L.

    Additionally, a chronoamperometry experiment was conducted to delve into the activation dynamics of PMS in the presence of the Cu-NC-20 catalyst. The results, depicted in Fig. 5b, showed a notable change in the current immediately following the introduction of PMS under open circuit conditions. This change was indicative of an effective electron transfer process occurring between Cu-NC-20 and PMS. It was reported in the literature that transition metal catalytic systems could form high-valent intermediates by heterolytic perovskite O-O bonding. Electron transition from Cu-NC-20 to PMS was instrumental in the generation of high-valent copper-oxygen species [Cu(Ⅲ)-OH], a process initiated by the heterolytic cleavage of O-O bonds, which subsequently led to the activation of PMS, as mentioned in reference [37]. To validate the formation of high-valent copper, Raman spectroscopy was employed. As shown in Fig. 5c, an emergent peak around 616 cm−1 in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system was observed, which was likely representative of high-valent copper-oxo species. This assumption was based on the peak's alignment with the known Cu-O stretch vibration peak characteristic of Cu(Ⅲ). Further evidence of Cu(Ⅲ) presence was deduced by employing 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol (DMP) as a chelating agent. DMP was recognized for its affinity to bind copper sites, subsequently inhibiting their activity by forming robust complexes with sulfhydryl groups without depleting PMS (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). The substantial reduction in kobs observed in Fig. 5d upon the addition of 0.05 mmol/L DMP to the Cu-NC-20/PMS system, further corroborated the presence of Cu(Ⅲ) species in the system [38].

    Drawing from the experimental findings and subsequent analysis, a proposed mechanism for the degradation of PE by the Cu-NC-20/PMS system was developed. This mechanism predominantly involved 1O2 and Cu(Ⅲ) species, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The process initiated with the coordination of Cu(Ⅱ) with PMS, forming a Cu(Ⅱ)−PMS complex. This complex underwent an electron transfer, reducing Cu(Ⅱ) to Cu(Ⅰ) (Eq. 1). Subsequently, Cu(Ⅰ) interacted with PMS in a double electron transfer reaction to form Cu(Ⅲ) (Eq. 2) [39]. Upon the adsorption of PE onto Cu-NC-20, Cu(Ⅲ) was reverted to Cu(Ⅱ) through an electron transfer step (Eq. 3), concurrently leading to the degradation of PE into smaller molecules. The activation of PMS by Cu-NC-20 was accompanied by the formation of SO5•‒, which further generated 1O2. In this process, Cu-NC-20 served as an electron transfer mediator, facilitating the electron movement from PE molecules to PMS, thereby expediting the production of 1O2 (Eq. 4) [40,41]. Consequently, PE was broken down into mineralized small molecules through a combined action of Cu(Ⅲ) and 1O2 in a non-radical electron transfer process ((3), (5)).

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  The mechanism for the PE removal in Cu-NC-20/PMS system.

    Previous studies have reported that the ability of non-radical systems to remove pollutants may depend on the electronic nature of the pollutants with some selectivity. Therefore, we carried out a more in-depth study of the oxidation rate of phenolic compounds by Cu-NC-20/PMS with its structural characterization by QSAR. For this purpose, the study incorporated the use of Hammett constants (σ, σ+, and σ). These constants were paramount in physical organic chemistry, serving as robust descriptors for substituent effects. They offered a comprehensive quantitative analysis to characterize the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing nature of substituents through their numerical values. Meanwhile, large negative values indicated strong electron-donating characteristics and large positive values signified potent electron-withdrawing capacity. This investigative approach led to an in-depth examination of the oxidation rates of a series of substituted phenols, specifically including 2-chlorophenol (2-CP), 3-chlorophenol (3-CP), 4-chlorophenol (4-CP), 2-bromophenol (2-BrP), 3-bromophenol (3-BrP), and 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP). These compounds were selected to represent a diverse range of structural variations, and their degradation behaviors in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system were meticulously analyzed to establish a clear correlation between molecular structure and oxidative reactivity.

    Fig. 7a presented the adsorption and degradation rates of various phenolic compounds in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system at a uniform reaction time of 10 min. For a clearer understanding of the QSAR, the contribution of adsorption to the degradation process was separated, and the remaining degradation rates were then analyzed in relation to the Hammett constant. As depicted in Figs. 7b-d, the negative Hammett constant (σ) showed the strongest correlation with the oxidation of phenolic compounds by the Cu-NC-20/PMS system, evidenced by an R2 value of 0.992. This correlation revealed that the rate of oxidation decreased as the σ increased. The negative trend of this relationship indicated that the Cu-NC-20/PMS system demonstrated higher reactivity towards phenolic compounds that possessed electron-donating groups, a characteristic common in electrophilic reactions [42,43].

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (a) The fractions of different PCs in Cu-NC-20/PMS system of two fractions: adsorbed fraction (fad) and oxidation fraction (faq). Correlation of reaction rate constants (kobs) for substituted phenols oxidation by Cu-NC-20/PMS system to the (b) Hammett σ constant, (c) Hammett σ+ constant and (d) Hammett σ constant. Reaction conditions: [PCs] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L.

    A detailed study was conducted to critically evaluate the effect of potential interfering factors in the natural aqueous environment on Cu-NC-20/PMS. This study focused on how the presence of ubiquitous inorganic anions and natural organic matter (NOM) affects the degradation efficiency of PE in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. Specifically, the study explored the influence of prevalent inorganic ions such as Cl, HPO42−, HCO3 and humic acid (HA). The experimental data revealed a negligible influence of these substances on the PE degradation process (Fig. 8a). This observation led to the inference that SO4•‒ and OH might not play a significant role in the catalytic mechanism of this system. The results indicated that the degradation process predominantly proceeded via non-radical pathways, showing a notable resistance to the influence of coexisting inorganic anions. Further, to evaluate the practical applicability of the Cu-NC-20 catalyst in real-world scenarios, experiments were performed using tap water and surface water as testing media. As illustrated in Fig. 8b, the experiments demonstrated high efficacy in PE removal, achieving complete removal in tap water (100%) and near-complete removal in surface water (95%). These results highlighted the potential of the Cu-NC-20/PMS system for effective treatment of PE in diverse natural water sources. Additionally, the recyclability of the Cu-NC-20 catalyst was examined to gauge its sustainability and practical utility. The decline in the catalyst's efficiency was indicated in Fig. 8c, with the degradation rate of PE dropping to 50% by the third cycle of usage. An in-depth analysis was conducted to understand the cause of this decrease in performance. N 1s XPS spectra comparisons of Cu-NC-20, before and after the reactions, showed a reduction in the Cu-N content from 33.4% to 23.8%. This reduction highlighted the loss of active catalytic sites as a primary factor for the observed decrease in performance (Fig. 1g and Fig. S12 in Supporting information). To counteract this, the catalyst underwent re-calcination after the third cycle. Post re-calcination, an increase in the Cu-N content to 29.6% was observed in the fourth and fifth cycles, as shown in Fig. 8d. This recovery process restored the efficiency of the catalyst and enabled Cu-NC-20 to degrade 100% of PE within 10 min in subsequent cycles. This recovery of activity affirmed the pivotal role of Cu-N sites in catalysis and underscored the Cu-NC-20/PMS system's adaptability and recyclability for real-world application. Collectively, these findings underscored the broad applicability and remarkable recovery potential of the Cu-NC-20/PMS process for water treatment.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  (a) Impact on PE degradation by different inorganic anions, HA, (b) PE removal rates in ultrapure, surface water, (c) Cu-NC-20 reusability for PE, (d) XPS analysis post-regeneration, (e) schematic representation, (f) PE removal rates in Cu-NC-20/PMS systems. Reaction conditions: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L.

    To further assess the recyclability and practical utility of the catalyst, a continuous flow reactor was designed, drawing upon methodologies outlined in references [44-46]. This reactor was constructed by embedding 20 mg of the Cu-NC-20 catalyst into a cotton matrix. The reactor was then employed in a top-to-bottom flow configuration, where a mixture of PE and PMS was continuously fed into it (Fig. 8e). The hydrodynamic residence time (HRT) in this setup was maintained at 14.4 min. The efficiency of the reactor in processing simulated PE wastewater was demonstrated in Fig. 8f. It was observed that the removal efficiency of PE using either PMS or Cu-NC-20 alone was below 20%. In stark contrast, the combined Cu-NC-20/PMS system exhibited a removal efficiency exceeding 90%. However, a noticeable decrease in efficiency was recorded after 100 h of operation. Notably, the concentration of PMS utilized in the continuous flow setup was lower (0.15 mmol/L) compared to that used in beaker experiments (0.25 mmol/L). This reduction, alongside the constant catalyst amount, highlighted the effectiveness and advantages of Cu-NC-20 in a continuous flow scenario and underscored its potential for real-world water treatment applications.

    In this study, we prepared a copper-based nitrogen-doped carbon material that showed excellent catalytic performance in complete PE degradation with kobs (0.544 min−1) was 7 times higher than that of the catalyst without added metal (0.087 min−1). The effects of pH, the concentration of catalyst, PMS, and PE on the activation of the Cu-NC-20/PMS system were explored. Through quenching experiments and EPR analyses, it was finally determined that the main reactive ROS for the degradation process of the system were 1O2 and Cu(Ⅲ). Therefore, it showed stable degradation ability in the investigation of the effects of inorganic anions and NOM. Besides, the QSAR between the phenolic oxidation rate and Hammett constant in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system indicated that the high selectivity of the system for phenolic compounds was highly dependent on its substituent species. Overall, the insights gained in this study contributed to the understanding of the design principles of Cu-based nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts. These findings were valuable for the efficient and selective degradation of phenolic compounds by PMS-based AOPs.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Mengmeng Ao: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation. Jian Wei: Data curation, Methodology, Software. Chuan-Shu He: Methodology, Software. Heng Zhang: Methodology, Software. Zhaokun Xiong: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Yonghui Song: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization. Bo Lai: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision.

    The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Sichuan Program of Science and Technology (No. 2021ZDZX0012) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52200105).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109882.


    1. [1]

      E. Mousali, M.A. Zanjanchi, Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 130 (2020) 547–566. doi: 10.1007/s11144-020-01790-z

    2. [2]

      L. Gnanasekaran, S. Rajendran, A.K. Priya, et al., Environ. Res. 195 (2021) 110852. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110852

    3. [3]

      H. Singer, S. Müller, C. Tixier, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 4998–5004. doi: 10.1021/es025750i

    4. [4]

      F. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 312 (2022) 121438. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121438

    5. [5]

      J. Lee, U. von Gunten, J.H. Kim, Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 3064–3081. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07082

    6. [6]

      X. Li, J. Ma, Y. Gao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 427 (2022) 131995. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131995

    7. [7]

      J. Dong, W. Xu, S. Liu, et al., J. Cleaner Prod. 321 (2021) 128781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128781

    8. [8]

      Y. Liu, W. Miao, Y. Feng, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 403 (2021) 123691. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123691

    9. [9]

      Q. Yang, Q. Xu, H.L. Jiang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (2017) 4774–4808. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00724D

    10. [10]

      X. Li, Z. Ao, J. Liu, et al., ACS Nano 10 (2016) 11532–11540. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07522

    11. [11]

      M. Hao, M. Qiu, H. Yang, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 760 (2021) 143333. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143333

    12. [12]

      B. Huang, Z. Wu, X. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 15667–15679. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05509

    13. [13]

      Z. Wu, B. Huang, X. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 14046–14057. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04343

    14. [14]

      Y. Wang, J.Le Roux, T. Zhang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014) 14534–14542. doi: 10.1021/es503255j

    15. [15]

      Y. Deng, Y. Dong, G. Wang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. 9 (2017) 9699–9709. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16851

    16. [16]

      A. Sadezky, H. Muckenhuber, H. Grothe, et al., Carbon 43 (2005) 1731–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018

    17. [17]

      Z. Wu, Z. Xiong, R. Liu, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 427 (2022) 128204. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128204

    18. [18]

      Y. Shang, Y. Kan, X. Xu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108278. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108278

    19. [19]

      C. Liu, H. Dai, C. Tan, et al., Appl. Catal. B 310 (2022) 121326. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121326

    20. [20]

      X. Wang, Z. Xiong, H. Shi, et al., Appl. Catal. B 329 (2023) 122569. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122569

    21. [21]

      Y. Wang, H. Sun, H.M. Ang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 433 (2014) 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.07.018

    22. [22]

      B. Huang, X. Ren, J. Zhao, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 14071–14081. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04712

    23. [23]

      S. Goyal, M.S. Shaharun, C.F. Kait, et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1123 (2018) 012062. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1123/1/012062

    24. [24]

      Y. Yao, H. Chen, J. Qin, et al., Water Res. 101 (2016) 281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.065

    25. [25]

      N. Zhang, E.P. Tsang, K. Wang, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 764 (2021) 142813. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142813

    26. [26]

      X. Song, Y. Shi, Z. Wu, et al., Appl. Catal. B 340 (2024) 123240. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123240

    27. [27]

      H. Zhang, C. Zhou, H. Zeng, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 395 (2020) 122613. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122613

    28. [28]

      P. Duan, J. Pan, W. Du, et al., Appl. Catal. B 299 (2021) 120714. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120714

    29. [29]

      C. Guan, J. Jiang, S. Pang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017) 10718–10728. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02271

    30. [30]

      L. Yang, Z. Xiong, J. Li, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 444 (2022) 136623. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136623

    31. [31]

      Y. Liu, W. Miao, X. Fang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 380 (2020) 122584. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122584

    32. [32]

      Y. Hong, H. Zhou, Z. Xiong, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 391 (2020) 123604. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123604

    33. [33]

      H. Zhou, J. Peng, J. Li, et al., Water Res. 188 (2021) 116529. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116529

    34. [34]

      Z. Yang, J. Qian, C. Shan, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 14494–14514. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05862

    35. [35]

      T. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014) 5868–5875. doi: 10.1021/es501218f

    36. [36]

      H. Zhou, J. Peng, X. Duan, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 3334–3344. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c07447

    37. [37]

      Y. Wang, H. Xia, K. Sun, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 304 (2016) 1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.007

    38. [38]

      X. Du, Y. Zhang, F. Si, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 356 (2019) 178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.216

    39. [39]

      L. Wang, H. Xu, N. Jiang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 4686–4694. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00284

    40. [40]

      S. Wang, J. Tian, Q. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 256 (2019) 117783. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117783

    41. [41]

      X. Long, Z. Xiong, R. Huang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 317 (2022) 121716. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121716

    42. [42]

      Y. Lee, U. von Gunten, Water Res. 46 (2012) 6177–6195. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.006

    43. [43]

      P. Zhang, P. Zhou, J. Peng, et al., Water Res. 219 (2022) 118626. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118626

    44. [44]

      Y. Yu, C. Yu, Z. Wu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 457 (2023) 141340. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141340

    45. [45]

      Y. Yu, Z. Xiong, B. Huang, et al., Environ. Int. 168 (2022) 107453. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107453

    46. [46]

      K. Yin, R. Wu, Y. Shang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 329 (2023) 122558. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122558

  • Figure 1  SEM images of (a) Cu-NC-20 and (b, c) TEM of Cu-NC-20. (d) Elemental mapping images of Cu-NC-20. (e) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (f) FTIR spectra of samples. XPS fitting results of (g) N 1s, (h) C 1s and (i) Cu 2p.

    Figure 2  (a) The removal efficiency and (b) corresponding kobs of different catalysts, (c) comparison of KMCP values of different systems, (d) Cu leaching. Reaction condition: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, [catalyst] = 70 mg/L.

    Figure 3  Influence of (a) catalyst amount, (b) PMS quantity, (c) pH levels, and (d) PE concentrations on PE degradation through Cu-NC-20/PMS. Reaction conditions: [PE] at 5 mg/L for (a), (b), (c); [PMS] at 0.25 mmol/L for (a), (c), (d); catalyst presence at 70 mg/L for (b), (c), (d).

    Figure 4  Impact of varying concentrations of (a) MeOH, (b) TBA, (c) SOD on PE degradation, (d) EPR spectra in Cu-NC-20/PMS, DMPO as trapping agent, (e) influence of varied FFA concentrations on PE degradation, (f) EPR spectra in Cu-NC-20/PMS, TEMP as trapping agent. Reaction conditions: [PE] at 5 mg/L, [PMS] at 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst presence at 70 mg/L, [DMPO] at 20 mmol/L, [TEMP] at 20 mmol/L.

    Figure 5  (a) The degradation efficiency of PE after premixing Cu-NC-20 with PMS, (b) the amperometric i-t curve of the reaction at 0.0 V, (c) the in-situ Raman patterns of Cu-NC-20, (d) and the kobs of adding DMP in the Cu-NC-20/PMS system. Reaction conditions: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L, [DMP] = 0.05 mmol/L.

    Figure 6  The mechanism for the PE removal in Cu-NC-20/PMS system.

    Figure 7  (a) The fractions of different PCs in Cu-NC-20/PMS system of two fractions: adsorbed fraction (fad) and oxidation fraction (faq). Correlation of reaction rate constants (kobs) for substituted phenols oxidation by Cu-NC-20/PMS system to the (b) Hammett σ constant, (c) Hammett σ+ constant and (d) Hammett σ constant. Reaction conditions: [PCs] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L.

    Figure 8  (a) Impact on PE degradation by different inorganic anions, HA, (b) PE removal rates in ultrapure, surface water, (c) Cu-NC-20 reusability for PE, (d) XPS analysis post-regeneration, (e) schematic representation, (f) PE removal rates in Cu-NC-20/PMS systems. Reaction conditions: [PE] = 5 mg/L, [PMS] = 0.25 mmol/L, catalyst = 70 mg/L.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  66
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2025-01-15
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-19
  • 接受日期:  2024-04-10
  • 修回日期:  2024-03-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-10
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章