Citation: Jing Li, Xinyan Liu, Hong Wang, Yanjuan Sun, Fan Dong. Prediction and interpretation of photocatalytic NO removal on g-C₃N₄-based catalysts using machine learning[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, ;2024, 35(2): 108596. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108596 shu

Prediction and interpretation of photocatalytic NO removal on g-C₃N₄-based catalysts using machine learning

Jing Li ^a ,
Xinyan Liu ^b ,
Hong Wang ^b ,
Yanjuan Sun ^{a, *,} ,
Fan Dong ^{b, *,}

a.
School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
b.
Research Center for Carbon-Neutral Environmental & Energy Technology, Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

sunyj@uestc.edu.cn

dongfan@uestc.edu.cn

Received Date: 8 February 2023
Revised Date: 28 April 2023
Accepted Date: 21 May 2023
Available Online: 26 May 2023

Figures(6)

Predictive modeling of photocatalytic NO removal is highly desirable for efficient air pollution abatement. However, great challenges remain in precisely predicting photocatalytic performance and understanding interactions of diverse features in the catalytic systems. Herein, a dataset of g-C₃N₄-based catalysts with 255 data points was collected from peer-reviewed publications and machine learning (ML) model was proposed to predict the NO removal rate. The result shows that the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) demonstrated the greatest prediction accuracy with R² of 0.999 and 0.907 on the training and test data, respectively. The SHAP value and feature importance analysis revealed that the empirical categories for NO removal rate, in the order of importance, were catalyst characteristics > reaction process > preparation conditions. Moreover, the partial dependence plots broke the ML black box to further quantify the marginal contributions of the input features (e.g., doping ratio, flow rate, and pore volume) to the model output outcomes. This ML approach presents a pure data-driven, interpretable framework, which provides new insights into the influence of catalyst characteristics, reaction process, and preparation conditions on NO removal.
- Machine learning,
- g-C₃N₄-based catalysts,
- NO removal,
- Interpretability,
- Catalytic informatics
1. [1]
  Y. Li, D. Guan, Y. Yu, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 5473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13459-w
2. [2]
  S. Rajagopalan, S.G. Al-Kindi, R.D. Brook, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 72 (2018) 2054–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.099
3. [3]
  S.G. Al-Kindi, R.D. Brook, S. Biswal, et al., Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17 (2020) 656–672. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2
4. [4]
  L. Taylor, BMJ 374 (2021) n2349.
5. [5]
  Y. Zeng, Y. Cao, X. Qiao, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 663 (2019) 329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.262
6. [6]
  K. Li, H. Wang, J. Li, et al., Environ. Chem. Lett. 20 (2022) 2687–2708. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01436-7
7. [7]
  T. Xiong, W. Cen, Y. Zhang, et al., ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 2462–2472. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02922
8. [8]
  C. Liu, Y. Zhang, F. Dong, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 203 (2017) 465–474. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.002
9. [9]
  Y. Li, Y. Sun, W. Ho, et al., Sci. Bull. 63 (2018) 609–620. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.04.009
10. [10]
  F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. Sun, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 219 (2017) 450–458. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.082
11. [11]
  T. Toyao, Z. Maeno, S. Takakusagi, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 2260–2297. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04186
12. [12]
  X. Liu, D. Lu, A. Zhang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 2124–2133. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06157
13. [13]
  S. Zhong, K. Zhang, M. Bagheri, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 12741–12754.
14. [14]
  A.J. Medford, M.R. Kunz, S.M. Ewing, et al., ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 7403–7429. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01708
15. [15]
  D. Xia, J. Chen, Z. Fu, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 2115–2123. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05970
16. [16]
  S.M. Moosavi, K.M. Jablonka, B. Smit, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 20273–20287. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09105
17. [17]
  S. Bae, H. Lee, J. Shin, et al., Chem. Mater. 34 (2022) 7761–7773. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01092
18. [18]
  M. Sasaki, H. Hamada, Y. Kintaichi, et al., Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 132 (1995) 261–270. doi: 10.1016/0926-860X(95)00171-9
19. [19]
  X. Hu, J.H. Belle, X. Meng, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017) 6936–6944. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01210
20. [20]
  X. Ren, Z. Mi, P.G. Georgopoulos, Environ. Int. 142 (2020) 105827. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105827
21. [21]
  X. Yang, X. Liu, A. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 1620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09629-5
22. [22]
  P. Gupta, S.A. Christopher, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114 (2009), doi:10.1029/2008JD011497. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011497
23. [23]
  J.R. Kitchin, Nat. Catal. 1 (2018) 230–232. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0056-y
24. [24]
  J.A. Esterhuizen, B.R. Goldsmith, S. Linic, Nat. Catal. 5 (2022) 175–184. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00744-z
25. [25]
  WebPlotDigitizer - Extract data from plots, images, and maps. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/.
26. [26]
  Scikit-Learn, Machine Learning in Python. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.
27. [27]
  J. Brownlee, Why One-Hot Encode Data in Machine Learning? https://why-one-hot-encode-data-in-machine-learning/.
28. [28]
  S. Zhong, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2021) 681–692.
29. [29]
  X. Yuan, M. Suvarna, S. Low, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 11925–11936. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01849
30. [30]
  A.M. Żurański, J.I. Martinez Alvarado, B.J. Shields, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 1856–1865. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00770
31. [31]
  A.A. Orlov, D.Y. Demenko, C. Bignaud, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 15542–15553. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04092
32. [32]
  K. Rahmani, A.H. Mamaghani, Z. Hashisho, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 433 (2022) 128747. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128747
33. [33]
  S.M. Lundberg, S.I. Lee, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, U. S. A., 2007.
34. [34]
  X. Zhu, Z. Wan, D.C. Tsang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 406 (2021) 126782. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126782
35. [35]
  Molnar, Interpretable machine learning - A guide for making black box models explainable. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/.
36. [36]
  X. Wang, L. Liu, W. Zhang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 7491–7500. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01603
37. [37]
  M. Khan, Z. Ullah, O. Mašek, et al., Bioresour. Technol. 355 (2022) 127215. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127215
38. [38]
  F. Dong, L. Wu, Y. Sun, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 15171–15174. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12844b
39. [39]
  J. Liu, T. Zhang, Z. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 14398–14401. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12620b
40. [40]
  F. Dong, Z. Ni, P. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 39 (2015) 4737–4744.
41. [41]
  G. Liu, G. Dong, Y. Zeng, et al., Chin. J. Catal. 41 (2020) 1564–1572. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63518-7
42. [42]
  W.J. Ong, L.L. Tan, Y.H. Ng, et al., Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 7159–7329. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
43. [43]
  M. Zhou, G. Dong, F. Yu, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 256 (2019) 117825. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117825
44. [44]
  L. Jiang, X. Yuan, Y. Pan, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 217 (2017) 388–406. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.003
45. [45]
  I. Papailias, N. Todorova, T. Giannakopoulou, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 239 (2018) 16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.078
46. [46]
  T. Giannakopoulou, I. Papailias, N. Todorova, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 310 (2017) 571–580. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.102
47. [47]
  X. Kang, G. Dong, T. Dong, A.C.S. Appl, Energy Mater. 6 (2023) 1025–1036.
48. [48]
  J. Geng, L. Zhao, M. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Nano. 9 (2022) 742–750. doi: 10.1039/D1EN00937K
49. [49]
  Y. Zheng, L. Lin, B. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 12868–12884. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501788
50. [50]
  X. Wang, S. Blechert, M. Antonietti, ACS Catal. 2 (2012) 1596–1606. doi: 10.1021/cs300240x
51. [51]
  J. Li, M. Zhang, X. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 212 (2017) 106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.061
52. [52]
  W. Yang, L. Jia, P. Wu, et al., J. Solid State Chem. 304 (2021) 122545. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122545
53. [53]
  G. Dong, L. Yang, F. Wang, et al., ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 6511–6519. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01657
54. [54]
  T.Y. Ma, J. Ran, S. Dai, et al., Angew. Chem. 127 (2015) 4729–4733.
55. [55]
  S. Guo, Y. Zhu, Y. Yan, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 185 (2016) 315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.11.030
56. [56]
  Q. Han, C. Hu, F. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015) 4612–4619. doi: 10.1039/C4TA06093H
57. [57]
  K. Qi, J. Jing, G. Dong, et al., Environ. Res. 212 (2022) 113405. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113405
58. [58]
  Y. Li, Z. Jiang, G. Dong, et al., ChemSusChem 15 (2022) e202200477. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202200477
59. [59]
  H. Zhang, A. Yu, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 11628–11635. doi: 10.1021/jp503477x
60. [60]
  Z. Lin, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. 52 (2013) 1735–1738 Int. Ed. .
1. [1]
  Qingyun Hu , Wei Wang , Junyuan Lu , He Zhu , Qi Liu , Yang Ren , Hong Wang , Jian Hui . High-throughput screening of high energy density LiMn_1-xFe_xPO₄ via active learning. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 110344-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110344
2. [2]
  Yuting Wu , Haifeng Lv , Xiaojun Wu . Design of two-dimensional porous covalent organic framework semiconductors for visible-light-driven overall water splitting: A theoretical perspective. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(11): 100375-100375. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100375
3. [3]
  Zixing Xu , Ruiying Chen , Chuanming Hao , Qionghong Xie , Chunhui Deng , Nianrong Sun . Peptidome data-driven comprehensive individualized monitoring of membranous nephropathy with machine learning. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 108975-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108975
4. [4]
  Xingyan Liu , Chaogang Jia , Guangmei Jiang , Chenghua Zhang , Mingzuo Chen , Xiaofei Zhao , Xiaocheng Zhang , Min Fu , Siqi Li , Jie Wu , Yiming Jia , Youzhou He . Single-atom Pd anchored in the porphyrin-center of ultrathin 2D-MOFs as the active center to enhance photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution and NO-removal. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109455-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109455
5. [5]
  Maosen Xu , Pengfei Zhu , Qinghong Cai , Meichun Bu , Chenghua Zhang , Hong Wu , Youzhou He , Min Fu , Siqi Li , Xingyan Liu . In-situ fabrication of TiO₂/NH₂−MIL-125(Ti) via MOF-driven strategy to promote efficient interfacial effects for enhancing photocatalytic NO removal activity. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109524-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109524
6. [6]
  Ze Zhang , Lei Yang , Jin-Ru Liu , Hao Hu , Jian-Li Mi , Chao Su , Bei-Bei Xiao , Zhi-Min Ao . Improved oxygen electrocatalysis at FeN₄ and CoN₄ sites via construction of axial coordination. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 110013-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110013
7. [7]
  Xiaoxiao Wang , Bolun Wang , Fenfen Ji , Jie Yan , Jiacheng Fang , Doudou Zhang , Ji Xu , Jing Ji , Xinran Hao , Hemi Luan , Yanjun Hong , Shulan Qiu , Min Li , Zhu Yang , Wenlan Liu , Xiaodong Cai , Zongwei Cai . Discovery of plasma biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease diagnoses based on metabolomics and lipidomics. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 109653-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109653
8. [8]
  Chengde Wang , Liping Huang , Shanshan Wang , Lihao Wu , Yi Wang , Jun Dong . A distinction of gliomas at cellular and tissue level by surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 109383-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109383
9. [9]
  Yanghanbin Zhang , Dongxiao Wen , Wei Sun , Jiahe Peng , Dezhong Yu , Xin Li , Yang Qu , Jizhou Jiang . State-of-the-art evolution of g-C3N4-based photocatalytic applications: A critical review. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(12): 100469-100469. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100469
10. [10]
  Xiaoming Fu , Haibo Huang , Guogang Tang , Jingmin Zhang , Junyue Sheng , Hua Tang . Recent advances in g-C3N4-based direct Z-scheme photocatalysts for environmental and energy applications. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(2): 100214-100214. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100214
11. [11]
  Yiwen Lin , Yijie Chen , Chunhui Deng , Nianrong Sun . Integration of resol/block-copolymer carbonization and machine learning: A convenient approach for precise monitoring of glycan-associated disorders. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109813-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109813
12. [12]
  Yao-Hua Gu , Yu Chen , Qing Li , Neng-Bin Xie , Xue Xing , Jun Xiong , Min Hu , Tian-Zhou Li , Ke-Yu Yuan , Yu Liu , Tang Tang , Fan He , Bi-Feng Yuan . Metabolome profiling by widely-targeted metabolomics and biomarker panel selection using machine-learning for patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 109627-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109627
13. [13]
  Xiaochen Zhang , Fei Yu , Jie Ma . 多角度数理模拟在电容去离子中的前沿应用. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2311026-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311026
14. [14]
  Jia Zhou . Constructing Potential Energy Surface of Water Molecule by Quantum Chemistry and Machine Learning: Introduction to a Comprehensive Computational Chemistry Experiment. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 351-358. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202309060
15. [15]
  Xinghai Li , Zhisen Wu , Lijing Zhang , Shengyang Tao . Machine Learning Enables the Prediction of Amide Bond Synthesis Based on Small Datasets. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(2): 100010-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309041
16. [16]
  Kai Han , Guohui Dong , Ishaaq Saeed , Tingting Dong , Chenyang Xiao . Morphology and photocatalytic tetracycline degradation of g-C3N4 optimized by the coal gangue. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(2): 100208-100208. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100208
17. [17]
  Xuejiao Wang , Suiying Dong , Kezhen Qi , Vadim Popkov , Xianglin Xiang . Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction by Modified g-C₃N₄. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(12): 2408005-. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202408005
18. [18]
  Liang Ma , Zhou Li , Zhiqiang Jiang , Xiaofeng Wu , Shixin Chang , Sónia A. C. Carabineiro , Kangle Lv . Effect of precursors on the structure and photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 for NO oxidation and CO2 reduction. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(11): 100416-100416. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100416
19. [19]
  Yue Li , Minghao Fan , Conghui Wang , Yanxun Li , Xiang Yu , Jun Ding , Lei Yan , Lele Qiu , Yongcai Zhang , Longlu Wang . 3D layer-by-layer amorphous MoS_x assembled from [Mo₃S₁₃]^2- clusters for efficient removal of tetracycline: Synergy of adsorption and photo-assisted PMS activation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109764-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109764
20. [20]
  Guanyang Zeng , Xingqiang Liu , Liangqiao Wu , Zijie Meng , Debin Zeng , Changlin Yu . Novel visible-light-driven I- doped Bi2O2CO3 nano-sheets fabricated via an ion exchange route for dye and phenol removal. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(12): 100462-100462. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100462

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Metrics

PDF Downloads(3)
Abstract views(299)
HTML views(12)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Prediction and interpretation of photocatalytic NO removal on g-C3N4-based catalysts using machine learning

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Prediction and interpretation of photocatalytic NO removal on g-C₃N₄-based catalysts using machine learning