English

Observation of the Gold Nanorods/Graphene Composite Formation and Motion with in situ Liquid Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy

• FANG Jiali ,
• CHEN Xin ^, ,
• LI Chang ,
• WU Yulian

• Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymeric Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P. R. China

Corresponding author: CHEN Xin, Email: xinchen73@ecust.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-21-64253582

• Received Date: 16 January 2019
  Accepted Date: 01 March 2019
  Revised Date: 28 February 2019
  Available Online: 15 August 2019
• Fund Project:

  The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21875066), the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project, China (B502), and the Shanghai Key Laboratory Project (08DZ2230500)

Abstract: In situ liquid cell transmission electron microscopy (LCTEM) was used to observe the dynamic self-assembly behavior of gold nanorod (AuNR)/graphene (G) composites in real-time. Many important reactions in chemistry, physics, and biology occur in solution and real-time imaging of the reaction objects in a liquid medium can further our understanding of the reaction at the nanoscale. Observations of liquid samples using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have historically been challenging due to issues with evaporation and difficulty in forming thin liquid layers that are suitable for election beam transmission. In situ LCTEM, as an emerging technology, provides novel opportunities for the real-time and high-resolution observation of dynamic processes in solution. In this communication, we report the use of in situ LCTEM to study the assembly behavior of graphene and AuNRs. By tracking and recording the changes in the positions and shapes of the AuNRs and graphene over time, novel composite formation mechanisms between AuNRs and graphene were observed. The AuNRs tended to approach the graphene edges tip-first due to charge attraction. After the assembled structures were formed, the AuNRs could rotate with the graphene edges, among which the edge-to-edge structure was more stable, without angle changes between the AuNR and graphene edge. Drifting motions of the self-assembled structures were observed. And compared with smaller self-assembled structures, the larger structures seem more effectively resisted pushing by liquid flow. In addition, the motions of the larger structure were more easily slowed due to the drag from the liquid cell window substrate. Graphene folding structures were also observed with LCTEM, suggesting that the folding structure can open and close in the liquid, causing apparent relative position changes between Au and graphene for a fixed AuNR on the graphene layer. Overall, the self-assembled structures are very stable and did not show any disassembly behavior in the liquid. Moreover, the AuNR/graphene composites were used as catalysts and showed improved catalytic performance compared to that of bare AuNRs in 4-nitrophenol reduction experiments. The self-assembled catalyst with a mass composite 1 : 5 AuNRs/G ratio exhibited the best performance with a k_app value of 0.5570 min⁻¹, 8 times that of the bare AuNRs. This significant improvement is closely related to the optimized and stable structure of the AuNR/graphene composites. In situ LCTEM provided a powerful characterization method for analyzing the complex self-assembly behavior of the composites in a liquid and will be useful for the development of high performance composite catalyst materials.

Key words:
• In situ liquid cell TEM
•  /  Self-assembly
•  /  Graphene
•  /  Gold nanorod
•  /  Catalytic performance

• 1. [1]

     Tian, N.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Sun, S. G.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z. L. Science 2007, 316, 732. doi: 10.1126/science.1140484

  2. [2]

     Chu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Tan, Y.; Deng, W.; Ma, M.; Su, X.; Xie, Q.; Yao, S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 3600. doi: 10.1039/C3EE41904E

  3. [3]

     Orendorff, C. J.; Gole, A.; Sau, T. K.; Murphy, C. J. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 3261. doi: 10.1021/ac048176x

  4. [4]

     Ozbay, E. Science 2006, 311, 189. doi: 10.1126/science.1114849

  5. [5]

     Anker, J. N.; Hall, W. P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N. C.; Zhao, J.; Van Duyne, R. P. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442. doi: 10.1038/nmat2162

  6. [6]

     Lal, S.; Clare, S. E.; Halas, N. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1842. doi: 10.1021/ar800150g

  7. [7]

     Zang, W.; Li, G.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2532. doi: 10.1039/C4CY01619J

  8. [8]

     Song, Y.; Lü, J.; Liu, B.; Lü, C. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 64937. doi: 10.1039/C6RA11710D

  9. [9]

     Yang, Y.; Luo, S.; Guo, S.; Chao, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, Y. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 29236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.086

  10. [10]

      Zanolli, Z.; Leghrib, R.; Felten, A.; Pireaux, J.; Llobet, E.; Charlier, J. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4592. doi: 10.1021/nn200294h

  11. [11]

      Jiang, H.; Akita, T.; Ishida, T.; Haruta, M.; Xu, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1304. doi: 10.1021/ja1099006

  12. [12]

      Gu, X.; Lu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Akita, T.; Xu, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11822. doi: 10.1021/ja200122f

  13. [13]

      Yang, X.; Chen, D.; Liao, S.; Song, H.; Li, Y.; Fu, Z.; Su, Y. J. Catal. 2012, 291, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.04.003

  14. [14]

      Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 207. doi: 10.1021/cs1000762

  15. [15]

      Xu, Z.; Luo, J.; Chuang, K. T. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.008

  16. [16]

      Shi, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Zhai, T.; Bao, W.; Xu, J.; Xia, X.; Chen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7365. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01732

  17. [17]

      Chen, X.; Li, C.; Cao, H. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 4811. doi: 10.1039/C4NR07209J

  18. [18]

      Zheng, H.; Smith, R. K.; Jun, Y.; Kisielowski, C.; Dahmen, U.; Alivisatos, A. P. Science 2009, 324, 1309. doi: 10.1126/science.1172104

  19. [19]

      周晓琴, 张辉, 张泽, 陈新, 金传洪.物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 458. doi: 458. 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701041Zhou, X. Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Jin, C. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 458. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701041

  20. [20]

      Liu, Y.; Chen. X; Noh, K. W.; N.; Dillon, S. J. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 385302. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/38/385302

  21. [21]

      Jiang, Y.; Zhu, G.; Lin, F.; Zhang, H.; Jin, C.; Yuan, J.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Z. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3761. doi: 10.1021/nl500670q

  22. [22]

      Wang, J.; Luo, H.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; Fan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, S. X.; Wang, C.; Zhu, T. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5815. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02581

  23. [23]

      Nie, A.; Cheng, Y.; Ning, S.; Foroozan, T.; Yasaei, P.; Li, W.; Song, B.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, L.; Salehi-Khojin, A.; et al. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2240. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04514

  24. [24]

      Lin, G.; Zhu, X.; Anand, U.; Liu, Q.; Lu, J.; Aabdin, Z.; Su, H.; Mirsaidov, U. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1092. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04323

  25. [25]

      Sutter, E.; Sutter, P.; Tkachenko, A. V.; Krahne, R.; de Graaf, J.; Arciniegas, M.; Manna, L. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11213. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11213

  26. [26]

      de Jonge, N.; Peckys, D. B.; Kremers, G. J.; Piston, D. W. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106, 2159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809567106

  27. [27]

      Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957. doi: 10.1021/cm020732l

  28. [28]

      Li, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Fang, J.; Zhou, X. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 4697. doi: 10.1007/s12274-018-2052-6

  29. [29]

      Zheng, H. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4070. doi: 10.1039/C3NR00737E

  30. [30]

      Praharaj, S.; Nath, S.; Ghosh, S. K.; Kundu, S.; Pal, T. Langmuir 2004, 20, 9889. doi: 10.1021/la0486281

  31. [31]

      Chen, X.; Cai, Z.; Chen, X.; Oyama, M. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5668. doi: 10.1039/C3TA15141G

  32. [32]

      Huang, J.; Vongehr, S.; Tang, S.; Lu, H.; Meng, X. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 15005. doi: 10.1021/jp104675d

  33. [33]

      Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, X.; Chen, Z. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 615. doi: 10.1039/C5CP05336F

  34. [34]

      Wang, D.; Duan, H.; Lü, J.; Lü, C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 5088. doi: 10.1039/C6TA09772C

  35. [35]

      Li, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8426. doi: 10.1039/C2JM16386A

  36. [36]

      Luo, J.; Zhang, N.; Liu, R.; Liu, X. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 64816. doi: 10.1039/C4RA11950A

•