Transition-metal-free coupling reactions involving gem–diborylalkanes

Yongli Li Dalong Shen Hao Zhang Zhenxing Liu

Citation:  Yongli Li, Dalong Shen, Hao Zhang, Zhenxing Liu. Transition-metal-free coupling reactions involving gem–diborylalkanes[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(7): 108048. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108048 shu

Transition-metal-free coupling reactions involving gem–diborylalkanes

English

  • Coupling reactions are now one of the most widely-used ways to construct molecule skeletons in organic synthesis, material science, and the pharmaceutical industry. Transition metal catalysis, notably those with noble metals (Pd, Ir, Rh, etc.), has been the mainstream in the development of such reactions, for example, the palladium-catalyzed carbon-carbon bond formation reactions [13]. Although successful, there are several issues with transition metal catalysis. One of them is the dwindling storage of noble metals on earth, which increases the price of many transition metal catalysts. The other issue is the metal residual contamination in the preparation of chemicals, which causes additional costs to remove them, especially in the pharmaceutical industry [4]. Furthermore, such transition metal catalysis is limited to a certain range of reactions, overreliance on which may ossify the chemical synthesis. Due to these issues, researchers are thrilled to discover novel synthetic methodologies, thus enabling a more sustainable chemical manufacturing process and wider chemical space to be found. In the last decades, transition-metal-free coupling reactions have emerged as an alternative and green way to make carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds. These include not only the surrogates for classical transition-metal catalyzed coupling reactions but also brand-new reactions [57].

    gem–Diborylalkanes, namely the 1,1-diboryl-substituted alkanes, have recently gained popularity in many aspects due to their versatile properties. These compounds have multi-sites to be functionalized. The α-C-Hs, if applicable, are acidic and can be easily deprotonated to afford the α,α-diboryl carbanions. On the other hand, the boryl group can be deborylated in the presence of a proper nucleophile to get the α-boryl carbanions. Both carbanions are stabilized by the α-boryl group and have found utilities in certain reactions [811]. In the early 1970s, Matteson and co-workers found that the reaction of ethylene glycol methanediboronate or bis(trimethylenedioxyboryl)methane with lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide (LiTMP) yielded the carbanion at −75 ℃, which could be alkylated with alkyl halides. The obtained gem–diborylalkanes could be further deprotonated and alkylated, offering a general way to prepare various gem–diborylalkane derivatives (Scheme 1a) [12]. When the α,α-diboryl carbanions were treated with ketone or aldehyde, alkenyl boronates were formed through the B-O elimination process. They could also react with the ester to make α-boryl enol borate (Scheme 1b) [13,14]. These obtained organoboron compounds were sensitive to moisture or oxygen and usually in situ transformed into ketone or aldehyde by oxidation or hydrolysis. One disadvantage of this method is the poor availability of the starting unsubstituted gem–diborylalkane, which needs several-step synthesis from triboryl or tetraboryl methane. In 1981, Mukaiyama and co-workers disclosed a novel aldol reaction involving α-boryl carbanion and ester (Scheme 1c) [15]. The α-boryl carbanion was derived from the deborylation of gem–diborylalkanes, which could be easily obtained by double hydroboration of terminal alkynes with 9-borabicyclo[3,3,1]nonane (9-BBN). The gem–diborylalkanes, however, were not stable and isolable.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Earlier work on the transition-metal-free coupling reactions of gem–diborylalkanes.

    This review discusses some recently developed coupling reactions of gem–diborylalkanes and their applications in organic synthesis. The contents discussed here are not a comprehensive collection of reactions but only selected examples. The selection criteria mainly include two aspects: (1) The reaction should be relatively general and has a reasonable substrate scope; (2) The reaction is better to be the fundamental transformations, for example, C-C/C=C bond formation and C-B bond formation. This review aims to draw the attention of more researchers to this field and stimulate the discovery of more promising applications based on this type of compound. Researchers in academia, fine chemical companies, and the pharmaceutical industry would all find this topic useful. Readers who are interested in the nucleophilic ring-opening reactions, 1,2-boryl shift process, and transition metal catalyzed reactions of gem–diborylalkanes are referred to some excellent reviews [1619].

    In 2014, the Morken group at Boston College reported a convenient deborylation-alkylation method to make alkyl Bpin from 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes (Scheme 2) [20]. Formally, this reaction could be viewed as a Suzuki-type coupling reaction for C(sp3)-C(sp3) bond formation. The reaction applies to primary, secondary, and tertiary alky Bpin compounds. Geminal bis(boryl)cyclopropanes could be functionalized in good yield and excellent diastereoselectivity. An intramolecular version of the reaction gave access to a range of cyclic alkyl Bpin with different ring sizes, which were otherwise difficult to prepare using other methods. The reaction possibly occurred via the α-boryl carbanion intermediate, like the aldol reaction mentioned in the introduction. Yet, two features of the reaction make it stand out. First, the starting 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes are readily available and bench-stable. Most of them are fine solids and can be easily made in grams in one batch. The unsubstituted CH2(Bpin)2 can be now purchased from many chemical manufacturers. Also, the reaction conditions are extremely simple and mild, under which the reaction can be completed by employing the widely used sodium tert–butanol (NaOtBu) as the base. These merits make this method a practical way to make various functionalized alkyl Bpin and open the door for many more elegant transition-metal-free coupling reactions using 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes as the starting materials.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  Transition-metal-free coupling deborylation-alkylation reactions of gem–diborylalkanes.

    In the deborylation-alkylation process, the pinB-OtBu was formed as a by-product. Later in 2017, the deborylation process was cleverly used in the C-B bond formation reaction (Scheme 3) [21]. Unsubstituted gem–diborylalkane (B1) and methyl-substituted one (B2) were employed as the borylation reagent with NaOtBu as a base. For aromatic iodides, commercially available B1 worked well to afford the aromatic Bpin. For less reactive aromatic bromides, B2 was generally better than B1, probably due to electronic factors. Mechanistic studies suggest the possible formation of Lewis acid/base adduct between organohalides and α-boryl carbanion. The obtained nucleophile then reacts with pinB-OtBu or gem–diborylalkane (B1 or B2), affording the final products. Compared with the classical transition-metal-catalyzed borylation reaction (Pd-catalyzed Miyaura borylation, etc.), this is a rare example of a transition-metal-free borylation method, featuring good chemoselectivity (reactivity: I > Br > Cl) and functional group tolerance.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Borylation of aromatic bromide/iodides using gem–diborylalkanes as borylation reagent.

    The α-boryl carbanions obtained could also attack pyridine N-oxides, followed by boron migration from carbon to oxygen, intramolecular C2-H deprotonation, and aromatization (Scheme 4) [22]. The products obtained were C2-alkylated pyridine derivatives, which often require metal catalysts or suffer from regioselectivities with the established methods. CH2(Bpin)2 here behaved as a methyl source, which was less developed in the alkylation of pyridine derivatives, such as quinolines and isoquinolines. Other 1,1-diborylalkanes also worked well under the current conditions. All reactions had excellent C2 selectivity, thus enabling its application in the late-stage functionalization of complex molecules, for example, 9-O-methylquinine N-oxide.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4.  C2-alkylation of pyridine N-oxides using gem–diborylalkanes as alkylating reagents.

    In 2020, the same group found that the alkylation could work directly towards pyridine/quinoline when dimethyl zinc (ZnMe2) was added as an additive and lithium tert–butanol (LiOtBu) was the base (Scheme 5) [23]. The reaction had excellent C2 selectivity for substituted pyridine and quinoline derivatives. C4 selectivity was observed for unsubstituted pyridine (C4:C2 = 6.3:1–13:1). The reaction is proposed to start with the formation of α-boryl carbanion by the combination of ZnMe2 and LiOtBu. Nucleophilic addition then occurs between α-boryl carbanion and N-heterocycle at C2 or C4 position with zinc as Lewis acid activator. Oxidative aromatization finally delivers the alkylated products. These two reactions constitute the transition-metal-free analogues of the challenging C-H functionalization of pyridines.

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5.  C2/C4-alkylation of pyridine N-oxides using gem–diborylalkanes as the alkylating reagent.

    In the early work by Matteson and co-workers, they have shown that reaction between 1,1-diborylalkanes and aldehyde/ketone would form the alkenyl boronates compounds. The problem is the instability of the corresponding alkenyl boronates. With the development of coupling reactions, alkenyl boronates become more and more useful. They can be used as valuable building blocks in many important transformations. So, the discovery of practical and stereoselective methods to make them is highly desirable.

    In 2010, Shibata, Endo and co-workers used the 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes as coupling partners for efficient tetrasubstituted alkenyl Bpin formation (Scheme 6a) [24,25]. The products were isolable through silica gel column chromatography. As of note was the E stereoselectivity for most substrates. The coordinating group could change stereoselectivity (>99:1 vs. 5:1 for OMe-containing substrate). In 2016, Fernández, Cuenca, and co-workers reported the application of CH(Bin)2(SiMe3) as a coupling partner for the synthesis of 1-SiMe3–1-Bpin-tetrasubstituted alkenes (Scheme 6b) [26]. The E:Z ratios ranged from 45:55 to 99:1. It is important to mention that even though configuration-defined tetrasubstituted alkenes and their analogues are of interest or have already been drug molecules (for example, tamoxifen) in the pharmaceutical industry, stereoselective methods for tetrasubstituted alkene synthesis are very rare. The two methods developed have been applied to the stereoselective synthesis of tamoxifen and its derivatives. Besides, the SiMe3 and Bpin groups can be easily transformed into other functional groups, like halogens.

    Scheme 6

    Scheme 6.  Stereoselective synthesis of tetrasubstituted alkenes.

    In 2015, the Morken group has developed the practical method for various di-, and trisubstituted alkenyl Bpin from 1,1-diborylalkanes and aldehydes (Scheme 7a) [27]. For 1,2-disubstituted alkenyl Bpin, most of them had exclusively E selectivity. While the stereoselectivity of trisubstituted alkenyl Bpin was moderate to excellent. Later in 2019, the same group reported the reactions between deprotonated CH2(Bpin)2 with ketones (Scheme 7b) [28]. For the reaction with 3-methyl butan-2-one, the isolated LiCH(Bpin)2 gave the product in 50% yield with 60:40 E:Z. The reaction with in situ formed LiCH(Bpin)2 from CH2(Bpin)2 with LiTMP afforded the product with slightly higher yield and stereoselectivity (54% yield vs. 50% yield, 75:25 E:Z vs. 60:40 E:Z). This result was attributed to the existence of TMP in the in situ formed reagent. Based on this, the authors have explored several amine additives and found that triamine ligands, such as PMDTA and TMTAN, could greatly improve the stereoselectivity. The reason for the improved stereoselectivity might be that PMTDA and TMTAN help to convert the dimeric Li enolate into a monomer and thus facilitating the rapid B-O elimination to get the E isomer. Compared with other traditional methods for preparing these types of alkenes, it is clearly seen that the transition-metal coupling reactions involving gem–diborylalkanes enjoy good substrate scope and excellent stereoselectivity, especially those multi-substituted alkenes. Considering the versatile transformations of Bpin moiety, these reactions are expected to be used in many applications soon.

    Scheme 7

    Scheme 7.  Stereoselective synthesis of di-, and trisubstituted alkenes through boron-Wittig reaction.

    Carboxylic acid derivatives are widespread compounds both in nature and in labs. Several decades after Matteson's report on the reaction between α,α-diboryl carbanion and ester, Pattison and co-workers further pushed this chemistry to a new level (Scheme 8a) [29]. The readily available 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes were used as substrates and the obtained intermediates could be viewed as bis(enolate) equivalents. In Matteson's report, these intermediates were only subject to hydrolysis. Here, three different electrophiles (NFSI, MeI, and trichloroisocyanuric acid) were used and various functionalized ketones were obtained. For non-enolizable esters, NaHMDS was enough to achieve a successful reaction. For enolizable esters, pre-addition of LiTMP and 1,1-diborylalkanes, followed by the addition of ester, was needed to ensure the efficiency of the reaction. This is probably due to the more efficient and complete deprotonation of the 1,1-diborylalkane with LiTMP than with NaHMDS.

    Scheme 8

    Scheme 8.  Synthesis of functionalized ketones from gem-diborylalkanes and esters.

    Different from the basic yet less nucleophilic NaHMDS and LiTMP, metal tert–butanol salts are both basic and nucleophilic. Besides, metal tert–butanol salts easily attack the boryl species and form the ate complexes. In the latter case, deborylation instead of deprotonation would occur, as has been shown in Prof. Morken's reports on deborylation-alkylation. In 2020, Chirik and co-workers reported the ketone synthesis from benzyldiboronates and esters (Scheme 8b) [30]. LiOtBu was used as the deborylation base and thus only mono(enolate) was formed. Different electrophiles including water, MeI, NFSI, and allyl bromide, were successfully employed in the reaction.

    Compared with ester, direct coupling with a carboxylic acid is very attractive. In 2018, Liu and co-workers discovered that the coupling between 1,1-diborylalkanes and carboxylic acid could be achieved by adding methyl lithium (MeLi) as the base (Scheme 9a) [31,32]. The reaction had a wide substrate scope, including mono and di-substituted 1,1-diborylalkanes, aryl and alkyl carboxylic acids, and a range of electrophiles. Mechanistic studies indicate the formation of a complex between the two substrates. The addition of MeLi deprotonates the complex, generating α-boryl carbanion and ate complex from carboxylic anion and MeBpin. Nucleophilic addition then occurs, affording the final products. Later in 2020, the same group extended this reaction to amide substrates (Scheme 9b) [33]. Due to the diverse structures and high stability of amides, these substrates are more challenging. After a lot of attempts, Liu and co-workers developed three sets of conditions (condition A for primary amides, condition B for secondary amides, and condition C for tertiary amides) for successfully converting the 1,1-diborylalkanes and amides into functionalized ketones.

    Scheme 9

    Scheme 9.  Synthesis of functionalized ketones from gem–diborylalkanes and acids/amides.

    Functionalized ketones are frequently seen in bioactive molecules and are also versatile building blocks for many other compounds. Traditional methods to access them include enolate chemistry, Pd-catalyzed α functionalization, and organo-catalyzed methods. Compared with these methods, the most impressive characteristic of the reactions involving gem–diborylalkanes is the wide substrate scope, including the usually inapplicable acids/amides. With this merit and others, the methods are certainly to be used in future organic synthesis.

    The above-mentioned reaction generally involves carbanion intermediates. Different bases were used to regulate the reactivity patterns. In 2021, Wang and co-workers reported an elegant approach to accessing α-boryl radical intermediates using gem–diborylalkanes as substrates under acidic conditions (Scheme 10) [34]. The acid (TFA) works as a mediator for transforming one Bpin to Bcat, which is oxidized to α-Bpin radical B. B then attacks the α,β-unsaturated ketones, affording the α-ketone radical. At this stage, two pathways may be possible. The path I is the direct hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) process, which furnishes the product. The other pathway (path II in Scheme 10) begins with the radical isomerization to oxygen radical, which reacts with in situ generated diboryl compound A to give radical B and boron enolate. Hydrolysis of boron enolate also affords the final product.

    Scheme 10

    Scheme 10.  Access to α-boryl radical intermediates from gem–diborylalkanes.

    Thanks to the stability and easy accessibility of 1,1-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkanes, the last decade witnessed quick development in the transition-metal-free coupling reactions of these compounds. Both Bpin groups are vital to the properties of gem–diborylalkanes, including the stability of these compounds and the carbanion intermediates. The oxophilicity of boron enables the wide-applicable utilities of these compounds. For reactions involving α,α-bis[(pinacolato)boryl]alkane carbanions, alkenyl Bpin or α,α-bis(enolate) equivalents are formed. For reactions involving α-Bpin carbanions, either C-C or C-B bonds are formed. The coupling reactions with carboxylic acid derivatives provide a unique way to make various functionalized ketones. While α-boryl radical intermediate offers another direction in the development of novel reactions using this valuable gem–di(Bpin)alkanes. The future endeavor should be the discovery of enantioselective transition-metal-free coupling reactions, especially those involving α-Bpin carbanion intermediates. In this aspect, organocatalysis can make a good contribution. Besides, the application of these reactions to the synthesis of natural products or bioactive molecules is expected soon.

    We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature of kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

    We are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22101261).


    1. [1]

      K.C. N.icolaou, P.G. B.ulger, D. Sarlah, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 4442–4489. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500368

    2. [2]

      J. Magano, J.R. D.unetz, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 2177–2250. doi: 10.1021/cr100346g

    3. [3]

      C.C.C. Johansson Seechurn, M.O. K.itching, T.J. C.olacot, V. Snieckus, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 5062–5085. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107017

    4. [4]

      C.E. G.arrett, K. Prasad, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004) 889–900. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200404071

    5. [5]

      C.L. Sun, Z.J. Shi, Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 9219–9280. doi: 10.1021/cr400274j

    6. [6]

      W. Jo, J.H. L.ee, S.H. C.ho, Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 4346–4353. doi: 10.1039/d1cc01048d

    7. [7]

      Y. Hu, W. Sun, C. Liu, Synlett 30 (2019) 1105–1110. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1611728

    8. [8]

      C. Wu, J. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett. 59 (2018) 2128–2140. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.04.061

    9. [9]

      R. Nallagonda, K. Padala, A. Masarwa, Org. Biomol. Chem. 16 (2018) 1050–1064. doi: 10.1039/c7ob02978k

    10. [10]

      N, Miralles, R.J. M.aza, E. Fernández, Adv. Synth. Catal. 360 (2018) 1306–1327. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201701390

    11. [11]

      S. Li, J. Li, T. Xia, W. Zhao, Chin. J. Chem. 37 (2019) 462–468. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201800575

    12. [12]

      D.S. M.atteson, R.J. M.ood, P.K. J.esthi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 5608–5609. doi: 10.1021/ja00852a062

    13. [13]

      D.S. M.atteson, R.J. M.oody, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 3196–3197. doi: 10.1021/ja00451a071

    14. [14]

      D.S. M.atteson, R.J. M.oody, Organometallics 1 (1982) 20–28. doi: 10.1021/om00061a005

    15. [15]

      T. Mukaiyama, M. Murakami, T. Oriyama, M. Yamaguchi, Chem. Lett. 10 (1981) 1193–1196. doi: 10.1246/cl.1981.1193

    16. [16]

      (a) C. Zhang, W. Hu, J.P. M.orken, ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 10660–10680.

    17. [17]

      S. Paul, K.K. D.as, D. Aich, S. Manna, S. Panda, Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 838–852. doi: 10.1039/d1qo01300a

    18. [18]

      E. Fernández, R. Gava, Org. Biomol. Chem. 17 (2019) 6317–6325. doi: 10.1039/C9OB00989B

    19. [19]

      F. Zhang, S. Liao, L. Zhou,  et al., Chin. J. Chem. 40 (2022) 582–588. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202100701

    20. [20]

      K. Hong, X. Liu, J.P. M.orken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 10581–10584. doi: 10.1021/ja505455z

    21. [21]

      Y. Lee, S.-y Baek, J. Park,  et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 976–984. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11757

    22. [22]

      W. Jo, J. Kim, S. Choi, S.H. C.ho, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 9690–9694. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603329

    23. [23]

      W. Jo, S. Baek, C. Hwang,  et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 13235–13245. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06827

    24. [24]

      K. Endo, M. Hirokami, T. Shibata, J. Org. Chem. 75 (2010) 3469–3472. doi: 10.1021/jo1003407

    25. [25]

      K. Endo, A. Sakamoto, T. Ohkubo, T. Shibata, Chem. Lett. 40 (2011) 1440–1442. doi: 10.1246/cl.2011.1440

    26. [26]

      E.L. C.ascia, A.B. C.uenca, E. Fernández, Chem. Eur. J. 22 (2016) 18737–18741. doi: 10.1002/chem.201604782

    27. [27]

      J.R. C.oombs, L. Zhang, J.P. M.orken, Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 1708–1711. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00480

    28. [28]

      S. Namirembe, C. Gao, R.P. W.exler, J.P. M.orken, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 4392–4394. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01663

    29. [29]

      C.E. I.acono, T.C. S.tephens, T.S. R.ajan, G. Pattison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2036–2040. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12941

    30. [30]

      B. Lee, P.J. C.hirik, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 2429–2437. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11944

    31. [31]

      W. Sun, L. Wang, C. Xia, C. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 5501–5505. doi: 10.1002/anie.201801679

    32. [32]

      L.H. Zou, M. Fan, L. Wang, C. Liu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 1911–1913. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.016

    33. [33]

      W. Sun, L. Wang, Y. Hu,  et al., Nat Commun. 11 (2020) 3113–3123. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16948-5

    34. [34]

      C. Wu, Z. Bao, B. Dou, J. Wang, Chem. Eur. J. 27 (2021) 2294–2298. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004581

  • Scheme 1  Earlier work on the transition-metal-free coupling reactions of gem–diborylalkanes.

    Scheme 2  Transition-metal-free coupling deborylation-alkylation reactions of gem–diborylalkanes.

    Scheme 3  Borylation of aromatic bromide/iodides using gem–diborylalkanes as borylation reagent.

    Scheme 4  C2-alkylation of pyridine N-oxides using gem–diborylalkanes as alkylating reagents.

    Scheme 5  C2/C4-alkylation of pyridine N-oxides using gem–diborylalkanes as the alkylating reagent.

    Scheme 6  Stereoselective synthesis of tetrasubstituted alkenes.

    Scheme 7  Stereoselective synthesis of di-, and trisubstituted alkenes through boron-Wittig reaction.

    Scheme 8  Synthesis of functionalized ketones from gem-diborylalkanes and esters.

    Scheme 9  Synthesis of functionalized ketones from gem–diborylalkanes and acids/amides.

    Scheme 10  Access to α-boryl radical intermediates from gem–diborylalkanes.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  10
  • 文章访问数:  1486
  • HTML全文浏览量:  83
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-07-15
  • 收稿日期:  2022-09-25
  • 接受日期:  2022-12-06
  • 修回日期:  2022-11-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-12-08
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章