Studies on reaction mechanisms and distinct chemiluminescence from cyanoimino neonicotinoids triggered by peroxymonosulfate in advanced oxidation processes

Mengdie Cai Weimin Gan Zhiqin Ding Hongping Cai Lijun Wei Xianglei Cheng

Citation:  Mengdie Cai, Weimin Gan, Zhiqin Ding, Hongping Cai, Lijun Wei, Xianglei Cheng. Studies on reaction mechanisms and distinct chemiluminescence from cyanoimino neonicotinoids triggered by peroxymonosulfate in advanced oxidation processes[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(3): 107554. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.068 shu

Studies on reaction mechanisms and distinct chemiluminescence from cyanoimino neonicotinoids triggered by peroxymonosulfate in advanced oxidation processes

English

  • Chemiluminescence (CL) has been widely applied in the field of environment [1, 2], food safety [3], clinic diagnostics [4], pharmaceuticals [5] and biology [6]. At present, it is still research focus in CL coupling with various nanomaterials, such as quantum dots [7-9], LDHs [10, 11], MOFs [12]. On the other hand, a lot of efforts are made for searching and developing novel CL systems [13] and new CL methods for the determination of emerging contaminants [14].

    Neonicotinoids (NNIs) are a class of drugs that act on the nerves of insects. By blocking the transmission between nerve cells, they cause the insects to become overexcited or paralyzed and thus lose control of their behavior [15]. Since the introduction of the first generation of NNIs, Imidacloprid, in the 1990s, more NNIs with different chemical structures have been greatly developed [16, 17]. NNIs are widely used in agriculture because of their wide spectrum, high efficiency and low dosage. However, at the same time, the presence of such pollutants has been detected in water bodies of agricultural areas around the world. Additionally, they have been reported in natural water bodies far away from agricultural activities, even in groundwater and drinking water [18, 19]. Studies have shown that the global decline in the number of pollinators such as bees is closely related to the presence of NNIs [20, 21]. Moreover, through the enrichment of the food chain, NNIs in the aquatic environment can be transferred to mammals, such as birds and rats, resulting in their death [22, 23]. It has been reported that NNIs also exist in normal human urine. In addition, it has been reported that the inhalation of high dose of NNIs will affect and change the memory storage, cognition and related behaviors of human beings, further causing human bodies to lose control of its own behavior [24].

    Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and persulfate are a promising oxidant, which has been widely used in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to eliminate organic pollutants in water [25]. They can produce SO4•− through heating, ultraviolet light irradiation or activation by some metal ions [26] or nanomaterials [27, 28]. Compared with OH, SO4•− has higher redox potential, longer survival time, wider pH range. Previous studies such as literatures [29-32] revealed that different degradation method exhibited different performance for the elimination of NNIs and reduction of total organic carbon although with the addition of PMS as oxidants. Meanwhile, various degradation pathways and transformation products were proposed. However, only one kind of NNIs was selected as the model compound to investigate the degradation mechanisms in the previous researches. Although NNIs had a similar chemical structure chloropyridine ring, each NNIs might show quite distinctly active sites (e.g., nitroso or cyanoimino group) when reacting with PMS.

    In this work, cobalt ions were employed to active PMS to generate free radical SO4•− which could degrade NNIs. Then, several frequently used NNIs were studied and compared based on the proposed system. The corresponding CL mechanisms were carried out based on the results of spectral data and mass spectra.

    First, kinetic CL profiles of acetamiprid (ACE) and thiacloprid (THI) were investigated in the present Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system. As shown in Fig. 1 (curve a), when 100 µL PMS solution was injected into the mixture of Co2+ and Ru(bpy)32+, light emission could be measured due to the redox reaction between PMS and Ru(bpy)32+. Significant CL enhancement could be observed in the presence of trace amount of ACE and THI (Fig. 1, curves b and c). This interesting CL phenomena is in accord with our hypothesis. Moreover, the CL intensity of THI with the same concentration was weaker than that of ACE. This is ascribed to its chemical structure with thiazole ring which influences the CL yield.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  CL profiles of Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system: (a) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++PMS; (b) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++THI+PMS; (c) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++ACE+PMS. Condition: 0.5 mmol/L PMS; 0.5 mmol/L Co2+; 10.0 µmol/L Ru(bpy)32+; 1.0 µmol/L ACE; 1.0 µmol/L THI.

    Then, the CL spectra of the present Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system reacting with ACE or THI were recorded (not shown here). An apparent light emission with maximum wavelength locating at 610 nm was obtained using fluorescence spectrophotometer with its exciting light source turning off. It is well known that CL emission at 610 nm belongs to the excited state [Ru(bpy)32+]*. What about other CL system including Ru(bpy)32+ when encountering with NNIs?

    CL systems of Ru(bpy)32+ with permanganate, cerium, lead dioxide as oxidants were studied in the presence of ACE or THI. No CL emission was found in these Ru(bpy)32+ CL system. Additionally, commonly used NNIs, including imidacloprid, clothianidin, thiamethoxam, dinotefuran and nitenpyram, were examined in the proposed Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system. Background CL emission was still constant, but remarkable quenching of light emission could be measured when encountering with popular NNIs except ACE and THI. These experimental results indicated that NNIs might generate different products in the presence of PMS with cobalt ions as catalysts, which was not in accord with other researchers. On the other hand, ACE and THI with same cyanoimino group should undergo the same reaction route and form similar products. While other five NNIs mentioned in this study with nitro groups involved did not take place the similar procedure. These clues revealed that other oxidant might include in the proposed system.

    Then, the radical scavengers were used to explore the types of free radicals in the reaction process. By introducing methanol (0.01 mol/L) and tert–butyl alcohol (0.01 mol/L) as scavengers for SO4•−/OH and OH, respectively. After adding methanol, the CL intensity of the system was reduced by about 80%, while the CL intensity of the system did not change after adding tert–butyl alcohol. It showed that SO4•− played a key role in this system.

    In order to further clarify the mechanism of present CL system, UV spectra of the substances were recorded before and after reaction. The results were shown in Fig. 2. The UV absorbance of THI (Fig. 2A) locating at 245 nm was produced by the pyridine ring. With the addition of Co2+/PMS, the UV absorbance at 245 nm disappeared and a new peak occurred with the maximum absorption locating at 264 nm, which indicated that the pyridine ring of THI might be damaged or a new ring was recombined and stronger conjugation effect was formed. As for ACE (Fig. 2B), the UV spectra changed a little differently. The UV absorbance at 245 nm decreased when the solutions of Co2+ and PMS were mixed with ACE. Then the absorbance of Co2+/PMS-ACE in the range of 260 nm to 300 nm increased but not as dominantly as that of Co2+/PMS-THI. It is speculated that it is associated with conjugation. Due to the existence of thiazole ring, the conjugation effect from products of Co2+/PMS-THI is stronger than that of Co2+/PMS-ACE.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (A) UV spectra of Co2+/PMS-THI reaction: (a) THI; (b) Co2++THI+PMS. (B) UV spectra of and Co2+/PMS-ACE reaction: (a) ACE; (b) Co2++ACE+PMS. Condition: 0.5 mmol/L PMS; 0.5 mmol/L Co2+; 50.0 µmol/L THI; 5.0 µmol/L ACE.

    Mass spectrometry has been widely used as a powerful technology for the identification of degradation products [33, 34]. In this work, mass spectra of products derived from the present CL system was shown in Fig. 3A in the presence of ACE or THI. The corresponding peak of ACE molecules with m/z 223.7 disappeared. The characteristic peak with m/z 209.3 (compound A) and 227.5 merged. It is further speculated that the cyanoimino group were the main reaction sites [31]. An ACE molecule after reducing a nitrogen atom was regarded as the peak with m/z 209.3, while m/z 227.5 was the addition products between H2O and compound A. Thus, a compound, cimetidine, also possessing cyanoimino group was selected to investigate the CL behavior under the same condition. The results indicated that cimetidine did not have any influence on the light emission. In addition, careful evaluation of mass spectra led us to confirm that there were not any hydroxylated or demethylated products reported in prior literatures [35-37]. The unusual results could be ascribed to not hydroxyl radical but sulfate radicals taking part in AOPs of cyanoimino NNIs. This coincided with the radical scavenging experiments and hydroxylated reaction pathway was less likely in the present condition. These evidences proved that there might be other factors in the present CL system. Compared to cimetidine, benzyl group existing in ACE and THI should be the target of SO4•−, which triggered the initial step of the present CL system and was consistent with the report of Zare's group [38]. Results from our experiments led us to propose that benzylic hydrogen abstraction of ACE and THI attacked by SO4•− afforded a carbon radical intermediate. The mass spectra of products generated from the reaction Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-THI had similar results with that of Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-ACE as shown in Fig. 3B. The peak with m/z 228.6 came from the THI molecules after the subtraction of both a sulfur atom and a nitrogen atom, while the peak with m/z 246.1 was products of water addition to m/z 228.6.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Mass spectra of products generated from the reaction Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-ACE (A) and Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-THI (B).

    According to the above-mentioned data, a possible reaction mechanism of the Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-NNIs CL system was established as shown in Scheme 1, with ACE as an example. First, a part of PMS could be activated by Co2+ to generate SO4•− radicals, which acted on the benzyl group of ACE and caught an electron. The resulted intermediate I with cyano group attacked benzyl group and a pentacyclic structure (intermediate II) was formed with imino group as a branched chain. On the other hand, the rest part of PMS could oxidize Ru(bpy)32+ to produce Ru(bpy)33+. The imino groups could react with Ru(bpy)33+ to generate [Ru(bpy)32+]*, which returned to the ground state and CL emission occurred.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Proposed CL mechanism of Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-NNIs system.

    The present work is carried out due to the findings of CL generated by ACE and THI in the Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system. Based on the results of chemiluminescence spectroscopy, ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and radicals quenching experiments, the reaction mechanisms of the advanced oxidation process of cyanoimino-containing NNIs was proposed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on annulation reaction occurring in AOPs of NNIs by PMS.

    The authors report no competing interest.

    The authors would like to thank for the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81960600 and 81760601), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Nos. 20192BAB205089 and 20192BAB205091).


    1. [1]

      W.C. Yu, L.X. Zhao, Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 136 (2021) 116197. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116197

    2. [2]

      Z. Lin, W. Xue, H. Chen, J.M. Lin, Anal. Chem. 83 (2011) 8245–8251. doi: 10.1021/ac202039h

    3. [3]

      B. Al Mughairy, H.A.J. AlLawati, Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 124 (2020) 115802. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115802

    4. [4]

      M.W. Yang, J.G. Huang, J.L. Fan, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 6800–6815. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00348D

    5. [5]

      Y. Zhang, R. Zhang, X.L. Yang, H.L. Qi, C.X. Zhang, J. Pharm. Anal. 9 (2019) 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2018.11.004

    6. [6]

      Z.X. Zhan, Y.C. Dai, Q.Y. Li, Y. Lv, Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 134 (2021) 116129. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116129

    7. [7]

      X.N. Dou, Q. Zhang, S.N.A. Shah, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 497–500. doi: 10.1039/C8SC03511C

    8. [8]

      S.N.A. Shah, X.N. Dou, M. Khan, K. Uchiyama, J.M. Lin, Talanta 196 (2019) 370–375. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.091

    9. [9]

      W. Xue, Z. Lin, H. Chen, C. Lu, J.M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (2011) 21707–21714. doi: 10.1021/jp207554t

    10. [10]

      W.W. Cheng, X. Teng, C. Lu, Anal. Chem. 92 (2020) 5456–5463. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00204

    11. [11]

      L.J. Zhang, M.N. Shi, W.J. Zhou, W.J. Guan, C. Lu, Anal. Chem. 93 (2021) 7724–7731. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01136

    12. [12]

      L. Mi, Y.D. Sun, L. Shi, T. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 7879–7887. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b18053

    13. [13]

      Z. Lin, W. Xue, H. Chen, J.M. Lin, Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 1051–1053. doi: 10.1039/C1CC15290D

    14. [14]

      J. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Lin, J.M. Lin, Anal. Chem. 82 (2010) 7380–7386. doi: 10.1021/ac101510b

    15. [15]

      K.L. James, N.P. Randall, K.F.A. Walters, N.R. Haddaway, M. Land, Environ. Evid. 5 (2016) 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13750-016-0052-0

    16. [16]

      D.D. Zhang, S.X. Cui, Z.P. Xu, D.M. Li, Z.Z. Tian, Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 1743–1745. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.05.002

    17. [17]

      C.C. Zhu, G.L. Li, K.Y. Xiao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.013

    18. [18]

      R. Meffe, I. d. Bustamante, Sci. Total Environ. 481 (2014) 280–295. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.053

    19. [19]

      A. Jelic, M. Gros, A. Ginebreda, et al., Water Res. 45 (2011) 1165–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.010

    20. [20]

      E.A.D. Mitchell, B. Mulhauser, M. Mulot, et al., Science 358 (2017) 109–111. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3684

    21. [21]

      K. Tasman, S.A. Rands, J.J.L. Hodge, iScience 23 (2020) 1–17.

    22. [22]

      C.A. Hallmann, R.P. Foppen, C.A. Van Turnhout, H. De Kroon, E. Jongejans, Nature 511 (2014) 341–352. doi: 10.1038/nature13531

    23. [23]

      J. Babelova, Z. Sefcikova, S. Cikos, et al., Toxicology 392 (2017) 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.10.011

    24. [24]

      A. Osaka, J. Ueyama, T. Kondo, et al., Environ. Res. 147 (2016) 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.028

    25. [25]

      D. Guo, S. You, F. Li, Y. Liu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.027

    26. [26]

      Y. Zhang, B.T. Zhang, Y.G. Teng, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 400 (2020) 123290. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123290

    27. [27]

      J. Qi, J. Liu, F. Sun, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1814–1818. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.026

    28. [28]

      C. Lyu, L. Zhang, D. He, B. Su, Y. Lyu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 930–934. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.012

    29. [29]

      L.W. Matzek, K.E. Carter, Chemosphere 151 (2016) 178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.055

    30. [30]

      F. Rehman, M. Sayed, J.A. Khan, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 357 (2018) 506–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.012

    31. [31]

      L. Chen, T. Cai, C. Cheng, Z. Xiong, D. Ding, Chem. Eng. J. 351 (2018) 1137–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.107

    32. [32]

      S. Zhou, Y. Wang, K. Zhou, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2179–2182. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.002

    33. [33]

      B. Lin, X. Lu, N. Li, N. Xu, J.M. Lin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 476–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.066

    34. [34]

      Y. Zheng, Z. Wu, J.M. Lin, L. Lin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 451–454. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.036

    35. [35]

      X. Cui, X. Liu, C. Lin, M. He, W. Ouyang, Chemosphere 254 (2020) 126820. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126820

    36. [36]

      M.M. Du, H.N. Kuang, Y.Q. Zhang, et al., J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 105647. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105647

    37. [37]

      J. Tan, Z.F. Li, J. Li, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 423 (2022) 127048. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127048

    38. [38]

      S. Banerjee, S. Sathyamoorthi, J. Du Bois, R.N. Zare, Chem. Sci. 8 (2017) 7003–7008. doi: 10.1039/C7SC02240A

  • Figure 1  CL profiles of Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+ system: (a) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++PMS; (b) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++THI+PMS; (c) Co2++Ru(bpy)32++ACE+PMS. Condition: 0.5 mmol/L PMS; 0.5 mmol/L Co2+; 10.0 µmol/L Ru(bpy)32+; 1.0 µmol/L ACE; 1.0 µmol/L THI.

    Figure 2  (A) UV spectra of Co2+/PMS-THI reaction: (a) THI; (b) Co2++THI+PMS. (B) UV spectra of and Co2+/PMS-ACE reaction: (a) ACE; (b) Co2++ACE+PMS. Condition: 0.5 mmol/L PMS; 0.5 mmol/L Co2+; 50.0 µmol/L THI; 5.0 µmol/L ACE.

    Figure 3  Mass spectra of products generated from the reaction Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-ACE (A) and Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-THI (B).

    Scheme 1  Proposed CL mechanism of Co2+/PMS-Ru(bpy)32+-NNIs system.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 文章访问数:  228
  • HTML全文浏览量:  26
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-03-15
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-07
  • 接受日期:  2022-05-21
  • 修回日期:  2022-05-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-05-26
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章