English

• Currently, the high demand for industrial applications requires multiple properties in one material for achieving device microminiaturization. One-dimensional (1D) Heisenberg spin chain antiferromagnets are of great interest due to their novel quantum phenomena such as quantum disordered state, spin charge separation, and so on [1–10]. Meanwhile, nonlinear optical (NLO) materials are of great importance due to their laser applications [11,12]. However, it is relatively difficult to achieve both magnetic and nonlinear properties in one material because magnetic property require unpaired electrons in outer shell of transition metal ion while noncentrosymmetric structure for nonlinear optical property need transition metal having d⁰ configuration with Jahn-Teller (JT) distortion. Presently, it is well studied that magnetic property and NLO property can be both importantly influenced by symmetric configuration and polyhedral distortion of central metal-anion coordination sphere [13–15]. Inorganic oxyanions (SO₄²⁻ [16,17], IO₃⁻ [18,19], PO₃⁻ [20,21], SeO₃²⁻ [22–24], BO₃³⁻ [25,26], etc. [27–29]) are usually utilized to bridge neighboring magnetic ions for desirable magnetic lattices, and create asymmetric building units for non-centrosymmetric structure with second-harmonic generation (SHG) activity. As well, mixed anions together with specific configuration could affect the distortion of magnetic metal octahedra MO₆ for adjusting magnetic property as well as resulting in other new properties including NLO property [30–35]. Furthermore, organic ligands can also be applied to synthesize various structural inorganic-organic hybrid magnetic materials with diverse metal-anion coordination environments. Particularly, oxamate ligands can provide a rich chemistry and are proved to be efficient tools for building target compound with a special bis-bidentate coordination mode [36,37]. Also, it is very chemically flexible with wide range of N-substituted substrates, of which bis-bidentate oxamate bridging group can mediate a strong ferro- or antiferromagnetic coupling between adjacent paramagnetic ions in a distorted N-replaced metal coordinated environment [38–40]. To explore the reactivity of multi-polydentate oxamate-based ligands in novel magnetic compounds, we have been investigating the ethyl N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)oxamate ligand (H₂Et-ohpma, Fig. 1a). And the addition of organic base will cause the hydrolysis of ester group of the H₂Et-ohpma, which makes it better to coordinate with metals forming low-dimensional structures. As a result, homo- [41] or hetero- [42] metallic antiferromagnetic 1D compounds were successfully synthesized. It is very clear that ortho-substituted phenolato group can effectively restrict central paramagnetic metal ions around oxamate group in 1D direction, and then the phenolato-oxamato co-bidentate-tridentate ligand can specifically give access to 1D chain configuration with distorted N-replaced MNO₄ square-pyramidal coordination environment. Moreover, their anisotropy and crystal fields for different magnetic exchange interactions can be consciously tuned by use of different N-substituted substrates. Meanwhile, the asymmetric ohpma ligand provide possibility to create non-centrosymmetric structures.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) Representation of the H₂Et-ohpma ligand. (b) Schematic view of the configurations of the two Cu ions. (c) Perspective view of the asymmetric unit of 1. N(C₃H₇)₄⁺, H₂O molecules and H atom have been omitted for clarity. (d) Representation of the chain in the packing of 1, through the intrachain Cu···Cu bonds (orange). N(C₃H₇)₄⁺ cations, H₂O molecules and H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Thus, functionalized H₂Et-ohpma ligands can be used as effective building units to experimentally realize novel 1D spin chain in a non-centrosymmetric structure. In this work, by using H₂Et-ohpma ligand, we present a successful realization of a novel polar 1D S = 1/2 chain compound [N(C₃H₇)₄][Cu(C₈H₄NO₄)]·H₂O 1 exhibiting both 1D antiferromagnetic and NLO properties. Most importantly, different from other reported multifunctional materials, both 1D magnetism and nonlinear optical activity are from the specific Cu square pyramids in 1, despite it is common to state that magnetism and second order nonlinear optical activity is contradictory. Its structure has been characterized by single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, and their magnetic and NLO properties are also investigated.

  Compound 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic system with the polar Iba2 space group. Phase purity was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) as shown in Fig. S2 (Supporting information). The asymmetric unit of 1 consists of two crystallographically non-equivalent Cu atoms and ohpma ligands (Figs. 1b and c), although two metal ions have similar coordination spheres. Each Cu ion is coordinated to two ligands. One ligand binds via its nitrogen and oxygen atoms of the oxamate part (N1, O3 for Cu1; N2, O6 for Cu2) and another oxygen atom from phenol (O4 for Cu1; O5 for Cu2), a second via two oxamate oxygen atoms (O7, O8 for Cu1; O1, O2 for Cu2). The geometries of the two penta-coordinated Cu^Ⅱ ions were further calculated by the free program SHAPE 2.1 [43]. Interestingly, the calculated results show that the Cu1 and Cu2 exhibit different geometries. The geometry of Cu1 could be viewed as vacant octahedron while square pyramid for Cu2 (Table S2 in Supporting information), which are defined by four O atoms and one N atom from the H₂Et-ohpma ligand. The Cu-centered square pyramid sphere is bridged with each other through oxamate group to form the 1D linear chain along the c axis with intrachain Cu···Cu separation of 5.240(1) Å. Hydroxyl oxygen atoms (O9 and O10) from uncoordinated H₂O, can form strong intramolecular O–H···O interactions with phenol and oxamate oxygen atom (O5 and O7). The O···H distances are 1.91 Å and 2.09 Å. The O–H···O angles are 165° and 150°, respectively. Additionally, intramolecular hydrogen bonds are also observed between two H₂O molecule with the O···O distance in the range of 2.842 Å, and angle of O10–H···O9 is 150° (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). Cu–N/O_eq (eq: equatorial plane) bond lengths average to 2.021 Å (1.901(5)−2.024(4) Å), with Cu–O longer apical distances of 2.237(4) and 2.286(4) Å. O/N–Cu–O/N angles vary from 83° to 99° for an averaged deviation to orthogonality of 6°. The constraint of the ligand's tridentate coordination mode makes a shorter Cu–N (amide) and Cu–O (carboxylate) bond length than some reported mono-oxamate Cu complexes [44–46], with an O3–Cu1–O4 angle of 165.78° and O5–Cu2–O6 angle of 163.34°.

  Compound 1 consists of an anionic oxamato-bridged Cu chain with tetrapropylammonium counter-cations and uncoordinated H₂O molecule (Fig. 2a). Adjacent chains are rather well separated from each other by the peripheral phenyl groups of the ligands and the bulky tetrapropylammonium cation, which afford an effective spacing between the metal ions of neighboring chains. The shortest interchain Cu···Cu distance is 12.0972(10) Å along the b axis and 11.1474(9) Å along the a axis. They are quite larger than that of reported oxamate-metal 1D chains, indicating that bulky cation can play a great role in well separating neighboring chains. Noticeably, adjacent chains along a and b axes are enantiomers while ligands are assembled clockwisely (left-handed) and anticlockwisely (right-handed), respectively (Fig. 1d and Fig. S4 in Supporting information). It is quite different from the homochiral left-handed helical {(HNEt₃)[Cu(ohpma)]} chain which contains chiral P3₂ space group using the same ligand and metal that we published recently [41] and we have already observed that consecutive absolute SPY-5–14(A) configuration can induce enantiomer excess 1D helical chain. Very obviously, different configuration of 1 is attributed to the utilization of N(C₃H₇)₄⁺ instead of HNEt₃⁺. Cu1 and Cu2 confer SPY-5–14(C) and SPY-5–23(A) absolute configuration (Fig. S5 in Supporting information) [47], and the ohpma ligands between adjacent chains arrange antiparallelly in forms of intrinsic enantiomers. Therefore, symmetric and non-polar counter-cation can greatly equilibrate enantiomeric formation in the case of spontaneous resolution. Contrast to the enantiomers from racemic ligands, it is less common to synthesize enantiomers when the reactants are achiral. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a heterochiral phenomenon has been discovered in sub-chain unit of oxamate-based inorganic-organic hybrid compounds. Since compound 1 crystallizes in a polar space group, acentric units of 1 are needed to be further analyzed. From above discussion, non-polar counter-ion N(C₃H₇)₄⁺, lattice water and specific arrangement of phenyl part from ohpma organic ligand with asymmetric environment in a unit cell reveals an almost cancelation of polarization. And the tetrahedral [CuNO₄] secondary building unit (SBU) are growing into a polar chain along the c axis with same direction. The net dipole moment of the [CuNO₄]_n chain in compound 1 is canceled out along the a and b axes while not along the c axis, thus resulting in a net dipole moment orientated along the c axis (Fig. 2b). Selected bond length and the oxidation state of Cu ion with +2 valance is confirmed by bond valence sum (BVS) calculations using values reported by Brese and O'Keefe [48] as shown in Table 1.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) Structure presentation of 1 along the a axis. N(C₃H₇)₄⁺, H₂O molecules and H atoms have been omitted for clarity. (b) The polar direction along opposite direction of the c axis.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Selected bond lengths, and BVS calculations for 1.

  DownLoad: CSV

  Since the compound 1 crystallized in a non-centrosymmetric space group, the NLO performance was studied. As shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), it exhibited a SHG effect, about 0.2 times that of industry-used KH₂PO₄ (KDP), which is larger than the reported compounds such as Ln₂(SeO₃)₂(SO₄)(H₂O)₂ [Ln = Sm (0.05 × KDP); Dy (0.04 × KDP); Yb (0.12 × KDP)] [49], (3-chlorobenzylammonium)₂CuCl₄ (0.25 × α-SiO₂) and (4-chlorobenzylammonium)₂CuCl₄ (0.25 × α-SiO₂) [50]. To clarify the origin of the SHG effect, the partial density of states (PDOS) was first calculated because the NLO properties of compounds are closely related to their electronic transitions near the forbidden band. As shown in Fig. S9 (Supporting information), the electronic states near the forbidden band of 1 are mainly occupied by Cu-3d C-2p and O-2p orbitals. It is clear that these orbitals are provided by the π-conjugated C–O units of the oxamate groups of the ohpma ligands from the [Cu(C₈H₄NO₄)] units, which has also been reported in other literature [51,52]. And it also corresponds to the calculated electron density map (Fig. S10 in Supporting information). In other words, the SHG efficiency of 1 is mainly provided by [Cu(C₈H₄NO₄)] units.

  Meanwhile, the magnetic properties of 1 were studied in the temperature range of 2–300 K under an applied DC field of 1000 Oe (Fig. S11a in Supporting information). As shown in Fig. 3, subtracted magnetic susceptibility shows a broad maximum at 70 K, which is originated from short-range order between neighbouring Cu²⁺ ions along the chain. A minimum at 34 K and then a sharp increase appears at low temperature. This feature is atrributed to a small amount of a Cu(Ⅱ) uncoupled impurity (4.33%), which referred as Curie tail (Fig. S11b in Supporting information). The Weiss temperature of θ = –8.72 K and the negative result indicates that the dominant magnetic interaction in 1 is antiferromagnetic (Fig. S12 in Supporting information).

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  The intrinsic magnetic susceptility at 0.1 T from 2 K to 300 K for 1. The corresponding fit to a Fisher fitting beteween 40–300 K (red).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To analyze the real magnetic property of 1, the Fisher's empirical law [53] for a S = 1/2 1D regular chain was used to fit the intrinsic magnetic susceptibility after subtracting Curie tail (Fig. 3a).

  (1)

  with x = |J|/T; N being Avogadro's number, β being the electronic Bohr magneton, k is the Boltzmann constant, J is the magnetic coupling constant, g is the gyromagnetic Lande factor with the value of 2 and χ₀ is the temperature-independent Van Vleck term. The best fit parameters obtained from Eq. 1 are J/k_B = −113.0 K and χ₀ = −2.07 × 10⁻⁴ emu/mol. The large negative value of J indicates that the intrachain interaction is a strong antiferromagnetic coupling.

  In comparison to other oxamate-bridged Cu²⁺ homometallic compounds, the result shows a relatively weaker antiferromagnetic interaction in 1 [54]. The splitting of d orbitals in a distorted square pyramidal field of Cu²⁺ is shown in Fig. 4. Because of the distorted square pyramid coordination sphere of copper (Since Cu1 and Cu2 are under same coordination sphere, only Cu1 is discussed in detail as below), the Cu1–O7 bond length is the largest. This means that the delocalized spin density onto the O7 oxygen atom is very weak. In fact, the high spin densities are localized on the O3, O4, O8 and N1 plane which the d_x orbital that contains the single electron of the Cu²⁺ ion distribute, perpendicular to the elongated JT axis with d_z orbital.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Scheme of compound 1 CuNO₄ distorted square pyramidal field and the splitting of d orbitals in a square planar field, with the effect of distortion.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In comparison to the examples in the literature where the magnetic d_x orbitals of neighboring copper ions share the same plane with the oxamato bridge, the interaction with the oxamate bridge is much weaker because it only occurs on the amide function (N1, O3) side. This considerably reduces the overlap between the magnetic orbitals of the neighboring magnetic centers. The interaction is proportional to the overlap between magnetic orbitals, so a lower overlap results in a lower interaction as observed in 1. For comparison, another helical copper chains with the 2-dimethylaminoethyl(oxamato) ligand present the same phenomenon with intrachain interactions of −121.1 and −106.7 K [55] close to the value of this work.

  In conclusion, a new multifunctional material [N(C₃H₇)₄][Cu(C₈H₄NO₄)]·H₂O 1 constructed by an ortho-substituted phenyloxamate ligand has been synthesized. Nonlinear optical study shows that polar compound 1 exhibits a discernible second-harmonic generation (SHG) efficiency. As well, the magnetic susceptibility results indicate that 1 exhibits good 1D magnetism with strong intrachain interaction but no conventional long-range antiferromagnetic order observed. This work proves that the use of specific ligand could provide a promising way to explore new multifunctional materials.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

  Acknowledgments

  We would like to thank Dr. Laurent Lisnard at Sorbonne Université for his helpful discussion on magnetism. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 22101091), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2019kfyXKJC016), the Innovation and Talent Recruitment Base of New Energy Chemistry and Device (No. B210003) and Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Basic Research.

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108780.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     Y.B. Kudasov, R.V. Kozabaranov, Phys. Lett. A 382 (2018) 1120–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2018.02.031

  2. [2]

     P.H.Y. Li, R.F. Bishop, C.E. Campbell, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 144423. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.144423

  3. [3]

     L. Wang, K.S. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 134441. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.134441

  4. [4]

     Z. Wang, L. Hu, L. Lin, et al., Sci. Rep. UK 11 (2021) 14442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93930-1

  5. [5]

     H. Lu, T. Yamamoto, W. Yoshimune, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 9804–9807. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06120

  6. [6]

     N. Li, Q. Lin, Y. Han, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3803–3806. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.04.042

  7. [7]

     F. Ding, K.J. Griffith, C. Zhang, et al., J. Solid State Chem. 314 (2022) 123360. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123360

  8. [8]

     X. Li, J. Yang, Nat. Sci. Rev. 3 (2016) 365–381. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww026

  9. [9]

     R. Gautier, K. Oka, T. Kihara, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 19268–19274. doi: 10.1021/ja409831h

  10. [10]

      Y. Wang, H. Liu, P. Fu, et al., Sci. China Mater. 62 (2019) 1815–1820. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-1198-3

  11. [11]

      Y. Deng, L. Huang, X. Dong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 21151–21156. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009441

  12. [12]

      G. Zou, K.M. Ok, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 5404–5409. doi: 10.1039/D0SC01936D

  13. [13]

      E. Bainglass, M.N. Huda, J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 (2019) H3195. doi: 10.1149/2.0281905jes

  14. [14]

      Z. Li, G. Zhu, Y. Li, et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104 (2021) 2655–2668. doi: 10.1111/jace.17620

  15. [15]

      Q. Zhang, J. Hu, Q. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1417–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.029

  16. [16]

      Y. Zhou, Y. Li, Q. Ding, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 263–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.014

  17. [17]

      Y.C. Yang, X. Liu, J. Lu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 21216–21220. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107780

  18. [18]

      E. Mitoudi-Vagourdi, J. Rienmüller, P. Lemmens, et al., ACS Omega 4 (2019) 15168–15174. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02064

  19. [19]

      X. Xu, C.L. Hu, B.P. Yang, et al., CrystEngComm 15 (2013) 7776–7782. doi: 10.1039/c3ce41185k

  20. [20]

      R. Baies, V. Pralong, V. Caignaert, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. 41 (2006) 1170–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2005.11.004

  21. [21]

      L.C. Liu, W.J. Ren, Y.X. Huang, et al., J. Solid State Chem. 254 (2017) 160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.011

  22. [22]

      R. Zhong, S. Guo, R.J. Cava, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 (2020) 084406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.084406

  23. [23]

      L.M. Volkova, D.V. Marinin, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 30 (2018) 425801. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aade0b

  24. [24]

      H. Jo, S. Lee, K.Y. Choi, et al., Inorg. Chem. 57 (2018) 3465–3473. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00305

  25. [25]

      S. Guo, T. Kong, F.A. Cevallos, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 472 (2019) 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.037

  26. [26]

      Q. Huang, L. Liu, X. Wang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 55 (2016) 12496–12499. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02044

  27. [27]

      X. Chen, B. Zhang, F. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 16311–16319. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b10009

  28. [28]

      M. Luo, C. Lin, D. Lin, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 15978–15981. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006671

  29. [29]

      M.D. Donakowski, R. Gautier, J. Yeon, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 7679–7689. doi: 10.1021/ja210984k

  30. [30]

      D. Oka, Y. Hirose, H. Kamisaka, et al., Sci. Rep. UK 4 (2014) 4987. doi: 10.1038/srep04987

  31. [31]

      H. Kageyama, K. Hayashi, K. Maeda, et al., Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02838-4

  32. [32]

      C. Tassel, Y. Kuno, Y. Goto, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 516–521. doi: 10.1002/anie.201408483

  33. [33]

      Y. Goto, C. Tassel, Y. Noda, et al., Inorg. Chem. 56 (2017) 4840–4845. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02834

  34. [34]

      H.J. Wu, L.D. Zhao, F.S. Zheng, et al., Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 4515. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5515

  35. [35]

      D. Hirai, T. Yajima, D. Nishio-Hamane, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 10784–10789. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05128

  36. [36]

      S. Wu, S. Bala, Z. Ruan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1381–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.012

  37. [37]

      Y. She, Y. Wang, S. Li, et al., Nano Res. 16 (2023) 3552–3557. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-5206-5

  38. [38]

      L.N. Ma, X.Y. Li, W.J. Shi, et al., ChemPlusChem 84 (2019) 62–68. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201800470

  39. [39]

      T. Grancha, J. Ferrando-Soria, M. Castellano, et al., Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 7569–7585. doi: 10.1039/C4CC01734J

  40. [40]

      Y. Journaux, J. Ferrando-Soria, E. Pardo, et al., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018 (2018) 228–247. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201701491

  41. [41]

      A. Li, Y. Li, L.M. Chamoreau, et al., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020 (2020) 3311–3319. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202000490

  42. [42]

      A. Li, L.M. Chamoreau, B. Baptiste, et al., Dalton Trans. 50 (2021) 681–688. doi: 10.1039/D0DT03269G

  43. [43]

      S.J. Liu, C. Cao, F. Yang, et al., Cryst. Growth Des. 16 (2016) 6776–6780. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00776

  44. [44]

      M. Castellano, W.P. Barros, A. Acosta, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 13965–13975. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403987

  45. [45]

      T.T. da Cunha, C.O.C. da Silveira, V.M.M. Barbosa, et al., CrystEngComm 23 (2021) 1885–1897. doi: 10.1039/D0CE01742F

  46. [46]

      E. Pardo, R. Ruiz-García, F. Lloret, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 13 (2007) 2054–2066. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600992

  47. [47]

      N.G. Connelly, D. Ture, R.M. Hartshorn, et al., Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations 2005, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2005.

  48. [48]

      N.E. Brese, M. O'Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr. B 47 (1991) 192–197. doi: 10.1107/S0108768190011041

  49. [49]

      E.E. Oyeka, M.J. Winiarski, H. Świątek, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202213499. doi: 10.1002/anie.202213499

  50. [50]

      C. Han, A.J. Bradford, J.A. McNulty, et al., Chem. Mater. 34 (2022) 2458–2467. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00107

  51. [51]

      H. Cheng, W. Jin, Z. Yang, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front 9 (2022) 4554–4568.

  52. [52]

      C. Jin, F. Li, X. Li, et al., Chem. Mater. 34 (2022) 7516–7525. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01831

  53. [53]

      J.C. Bonner, M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) A640–A658. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.135.A640

  54. [54]

      E.Q. Gao, Q.H. Zhao, J.K. Tang, et al., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (2001) 1537–1540. doi: 10.1039/B100142F

  55. [55]

      C. Kachi-Terajima, M. Ishii, T. Saito, et al., Inorg. Chem. 51 (2012) 7502–7507. doi: 10.1021/ic202708e

• 

  Figure 1  (a) Representation of the H₂Et-ohpma ligand. (b) Schematic view of the configurations of the two Cu ions. (c) Perspective view of the asymmetric unit of 1. N(C₃H₇)₄⁺, H₂O molecules and H atom have been omitted for clarity. (d) Representation of the chain in the packing of 1, through the intrachain Cu···Cu bonds (orange). N(C₃H₇)₄⁺ cations, H₂O molecules and H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) Structure presentation of 1 along the a axis. N(C₃H₇)₄⁺, H₂O molecules and H atoms have been omitted for clarity. (b) The polar direction along opposite direction of the c axis.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  The intrinsic magnetic susceptility at 0.1 T from 2 K to 300 K for 1. The corresponding fit to a Fisher fitting beteween 40–300 K (red).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Scheme of compound 1 CuNO₄ distorted square pyramidal field and the splitting of d orbitals in a square planar field, with the effect of distortion.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Selected bond lengths, and BVS calculations for 1.

  下载: 导出CSV
•