English

Symmetry-Dependent Transport Properties of γ-Graphyne-based Molecular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions

• Yishun Yang ^{1, 2,} ,
• Min Zhou ^{1, 2, ,} ,
• Yanxia Xing ^{1, 2, ,}

• 1.

  Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement, Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

• 2.

  Beijing Key Laboratory of Nanophotonics and Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Corresponding author: Min Zhou, zhoumin@bit.edu.cn Yanxia Xing, xingyanxia@bit.edu.cn

• Received Date: 02 March 2020
  Accepted Date: 05 May 2020
  Revised Date: 30 April 2020
  Available Online: 15 April 2022
• Fund Project:

Abstract: The molecular magnetic tunnel junction (MMTJ) with high tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) is an important component for devices such as computers and electronic storage. With the rapid development of the modern electronics industry, the decrease of device size and the increase of area density, it is important to improve TMR technology. In addition, the computing process faces huge challenges. As the size of electronic devices decreases, small changes may cause completely different transmission characteristics, therefore the minute details of the device must be carefully controlled. In this paper, in order to find large TMR values and explore the role of symmetry on spin-polarized transport properties, γ-graphyne nanodots (γ-GYND) coupled between ferromagnetic (FM) metallic zigzag graphene nanoribbon (ZGNR) electrodes were used. Depending on the widths of the ZGNR and two types of contact positions between the ZGNR and γ-graphyne nanodots (γ-GYND), eight ZGNR/γ-GYND/ZGNR MMTJs with different symmetries were constructed. By using Keldysh non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) and density functional theory (DFT), the I-V curve, the spin-injection efficiency (SIE) and TMR of MMTJs were calculated. We found that the transport properties of these MMTJs differed substantially. For absolute symmetric MMTJs, due to the wave functions corresponding to the band structure near the Fermi energy having different parity, the electron transport between the wave functions with different parity is prohibited, so we can see that the spin-down current is always zero. This implies that these absolutely symmetrical structures have 100% spin injection efficiency over a wide range of bias voltages. In addition, the calculation results also show that these absolutely symmetric structures also have large TMR at low bias, up to 3.7 × 10⁵, indicating that these devices have a large magnetoresistance effect and high magnetic field sensitivity, which can be used in the read head of computer hard disks, MRAM, and various magnetic sensors. However, for these asymmetric MMTJs, since there is no limitation of the wave function parity of the left and right electrodes, the spin-up current and spin-down current fluctuated as the bias voltage increased, so perfect SIE does not appear. In addition, the calculation results showed that the TMR of asymmetric MMTJs were four orders of magnitude smaller than with symmetric MMTJs. Thus the symmetry of MMTJs has a great influence on the spin-polarized transport properties of the device. These absolutely symmetrical MMTJs have spin-polarized transport properties that are far superior to other MMTJs. This is conducive to the manufacture of spin filters, rectifiers, and various magnetic sensors. Finally, these excellent characteristics can be explained by the transmission coefficient, local density of states (LDOS) and band structure.

Key words:
• Non-equilibrium Green's function
•  /  Density functional theory
•  /  Zigzag graphene nanoribbon
•  /  γ-Graphyne nanodot
•  /  Spin injection efficiency
•  /  Tunneling magnetoresistance
•  /  Spin-polarized transport property

• 1. [1]

     Wolf, S. A.; Treger, D.; Chtchelkanova, A. MRS Bull. 2011, 31, 400. doi: 10.1557/mrs2006.101

  2. [2]

     Seneor, P.; Dlubak, B.; Martin, M. B.; Anane, A.; Jaffres, H.; Fert, A. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 1245. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2012.277

  3. [3]

     Chambers, S. A.; Yoo, Y. K. MRS Bull. 2011, 28, 706. doi: 10.1557/mrs2003.210

  4. [4]

     Lyu, J. K.; Zhang, S. F.; Zhang, C. W.; Wang, P. J. Ann. Physik. 2019, 531, 1900017. doi: 10.1002/andp.201900017

  5. [5]

     Chen, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 1601. doi: 10.1039/C5CP04652A

  6. [6]

     杨勇辉, 孙红娟, 彭同江, 黄桥. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27, 736. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110320Yang, Y. H.; Sun, H. J.; Peng, T. J.; Huang, Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27, 736. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110320

  7. [7]

     胡耀娟, 金娟, 张卉, 吴萍, 蔡称心. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26, 2073. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100812Hu, Y. J.; Jin, J.; Zhang, H.; Wu, P.; Cai, C. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 2073. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100812

  8. [8]

     Yang, L.; Park, C. H.; Son, Y. W.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 186801. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.186801

  9. [9]

     Owens, F. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 194701. doi: 10.1063/1.2905215

  10. [10]

      Fujita, M.; Wakabayashi, K.; Nakada, K.; Kusakabe, K. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 65, 1920. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.65.1920

  11. [11]

      Kobayashi, Y.; Fukui, K. I.; Enoki, T.; Kusakabe, K. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 125415. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.125415

  12. [12]

      Nakada, K.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 17954. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.54.17954

  13. [13]

      Pisani, L.; Chan, J. A.; Montanari, B.; Harrison, N. M. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 064418. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.064418

  14. [14]

      Wakabayashi, K.; Fujita, M.; Ajiki, H.; Sigrist, M. Carbon Based Magnet. 2006, 59, 279. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8271

  15. [15]

      Yazyev, O. V.; Katsnelson, M. I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 047209. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.047209

  16. [16]

      Qiao, Z.; Yang, S. A.; Wang, B.; Yao, Y.; Niu, Q. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 035431. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.035431

  17. [17]

      Li, Z.; Qian, H.; Wu, J.; Gu, B. L.; Duan, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 206802. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.206802

  18. [18]

      李勇军, 李玉良. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 992. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801302Li, Y. J.; Li, Y. L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 992. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801302

  19. [19]

      徐宁, 孔凡杰, 王延宗. 物理化学学报2011, 27, 559. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110305Xu, N.; Kong, F. J.; Wang, Y. Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27, 559. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110305

  20. [20]

      Spitler, E. L.; Ii, C. A.; Haley, M. M. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 5344. doi: 10.1002/chin.200718260

  21. [21]

      Kehoe, J. M.; Kiley, J. H.; English, J. J.; Johnson, C. A.; Petersen, R. C.; Haley, M. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 969. doi: 10.1002/chin.200027097

  22. [22]

      Zhou, J.; Lv, K.; Wang, Q.; Chen, X. S.; Sun, Q.; Jena, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 174701. doi: 10.1063/1.3583476

  23. [23]

      黄长水, 李玉良. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 1314. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201605035Huang, C. S.; Li, Y. L. Acta. Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 1314. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201605035

  24. [24]

      奚晋扬, 中村悠马, 赵天琦, 王冬, 帅志刚. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 961. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201802051Xi, J. Y.; Nakamura, Y. M.; Zhao, T. Q.; Wang, D.; Shuai, Z. G. Acta. Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 961. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201802051

  25. [25]

      Wu, W.; Guo, W.; Zeng, X. C. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9264. doi: 10.1039/c3nr03167e

  26. [26]

      Shao, Z. G.; Sun, Z. L. Phys. E. 2015, 74, 438. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2015.07.011

  27. [27]

      Kim, G. B.; Choi; Joon, H. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 79, 86. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115435

  28. [28]

      Ni, Y.; Yao, K. L.; Fu, H. H.; Gao, G. Y.; Zhu, S. C.; Luo, B.; Wang, S. L.; Li, R. X. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4468. doi: 10.1039/C3NR00731F

  29. [29]

      Lu, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 17112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.066

  30. [30]

      Yue, Q.; Chang, S.; Tan, J.; Qin, S.; Kang, J.; Li, J. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 235448. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.86.235448

  31. [31]

      Zhai, M. X.; Wang, X. F.; Vasilopoulos, P.; Liu, Y. S.; Dong, Y. J.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, Y. J.; You, W. L. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11121. doi: 10.1039/c4nr02426e

  32. [32]

      Ding, H.; Bai, H.; Huang, Y. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 077153. doi: 10.1063/1.4927497

  33. [33]

      León, A.; Pacheco, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2015, 620, 67. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.12.038

  34. [34]

      Saraiva-Souza, A.; Smeu, M.; Zhang, L.; Ratner, M. A.; Guo, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 4605. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11235

  35. [35]

      Wang, B.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, H. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 3432. doi: 10.1039/C5NR06585B

  36. [36]

      Waldron, D.; Haney, P.; Larade, B.; MacDonald, A.; Guo, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 166804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.166804

  37. [37]

      Waldron, D.; Timoshevskii, V.; Hu, Y.; Xia, K.; Guo, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 226802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.226802

  38. [38]

      Taylor, J.; Guo, H.; Wang, J. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 245407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407

  39. [39]

      Taylor, J.; Guo, H.; Wang, J. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 121104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.121104

  40. [40]

      Ordejón; Pablo and Artacho; Emilio and Soler; M. A. J. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 1996, 53, R10441. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.r10441

  41. [41]

      Artacho, E.; Anglada, E.; Diéguez, O.; Gale; J.; García, A.; Junquera, J.; Martin, R. M.; Ordejón, P.; Pruneda, J. M.; Sánchez-Portal, D. J.; et al. Phys. Condes. Matter 2008, 20, 064208. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/6/064208

  42. [42]

      Perdew, J. P.; Zunger, A. Phys. Rev. B: Condes. Matter 1981, 23, 5048. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048

  43. [43]

      Velev, J. P.; Belashchenko, K. D.; Jaswal, S. S.; Tsymbal, E. Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 72502. doi: 10.1063/1.2643027

  44. [44]

      Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev. B: Condes. Matter 1991, 43, 1993. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993

•