Cationic surface polarization centers on ionic carbon nitride for efficient solar-driven H2O2 production and pollutant abatement

Zhenyu Hu Zhenchun Yang Shiqi Zeng Kun Wang Lina Li Chun Hu Yubao Zhao

Citation:  Zhenyu Hu, Zhenchun Yang, Shiqi Zeng, Kun Wang, Lina Li, Chun Hu, Yubao Zhao. Cationic surface polarization centers on ionic carbon nitride for efficient solar-driven H2O2 production and pollutant abatement[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109526. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109526 shu

Cationic surface polarization centers on ionic carbon nitride for efficient solar-driven H2O2 production and pollutant abatement

English

  • Employing the sustainable solar energy is one of the essential approaches towards the low carbon future of the planet [1]. As one of the most important technologies for utilizing the solar energy, heterogeneous photocatalysis has attracted tremendous research interest for solar energy storage and conversion, in which, development of stable and cost-effective photocatalyst with decent solar conversion efficiency owns the priority. Polymeric carbon nitride (PCN) framework has the favorable features of non-toxicity, physiochemical stability, low cost of synthesis, and most importantly, noticeable visible-light response [2,3]. However, as a typical organic framework, PCN has low dielectric permittivity and high singlet exciton Coulombic binding energy; and the excitons are localized in the heptazine unit, and via the overlapped molecular orbitals, the polarons are hopping along the direction perpendicular to the heptazine unit in Brownian motion [4]. These unique features result in low exciton dissociation and short charge diffusion length [5,6], leading to low solar-conversion efficiency of the pristine CN framework [79]. The energy-downhill cascade electron transfer process is a crucial component of the photo-to-chemical conversion in natural photosynthesis [1013]. Comparably, in artificial photosynthesis, donor-acceptor (D-A) micro-structure is typically designed to induce an internal local electric field, and thereby provide an energetically downward process for driving the spatial-separation of the charges [1418]. It is reported that generation of charged/neutral local polarization sites in conjugated polymer could significantly enhance the exciton dissociation [1923]. Moreover, incorporation of metal ion into the conjugated polymer framework is proven to be efficient in inducing locally polarized micro-environment and boosting the exciton dissociation [2429]. However, superbly designed reaction systems with notable apparent quantum yields that were created by inducing an internal electric field within a polymeric photocatalyst are occasionally reported, and further breakthrough based on this strategy is highly desired [25,30,31].

    Photocatalytic H2O2 production is one of the major approaches for solar-to-chemical conversion. Hydrogen peroxide is a versatile chemical, and finds applications in a wide range of areas, such as environmental remediation, energy storage/conversion, and chemical industry [3235]. Development of the solar-driven H2O2 production process is potentially a highly sustainable and cost-effective approach, as compared to the energy-intensive industrial anthraquinone process. Heterogeneous photocatalytic H2O2 generation via selective dioxygen reduction reaction (ORR) exhibits significant environmental-friendliness and sustainability, and is thus attracted enormous research interests [3537]. Selective 2e ORR to H2O2 generation is especially favorable in the carbon-centered surface-active sites, and polymeric carbon nitride framework is thereby an ideal platform for realizing efficient solar-driven H2O2 production [3842]. It is thus especially promising to reach a satisfactory efficiency in solar-driven H2O2 production by developing novel strategies for upgrading the configuration of the carbon nitride photocatalyzed reaction system.

    Herein, we create the combination of pyridinium ion sites induced local polarization on the surface and K+-complexation caused local polarization in the bulk in a polymeric carbon nitride framework, and demonstrate the remarkable enhancement of the photocatalytic performance by combined local polarizations both in the bulk and on the surface. A trace amount of ionic sites on the surface is essential to the enhancement of the photocatalytic performance: 77.5% apparent quantum yield (AQY) for H2O2 production with ethanol as the proton/electron donor. Additionally, some pervasively detected endocrine disruptors and antibiotics could serve as proton/electron donor, and simultaneous H2O2 production and emerging organic pollutants degradation is thereby realized.

    The K+-incorporated polymeric carbon nitride framework (CNK) was synthesized via a modified method previously reported [43]. In a typical synthesis, 20 g KCl and 10 g melamine were mixed in 100 mL DI water. The mixture was magnetically stirred at 80 ℃ until all the solvent evaporated. The solid was pulverized and transferred to a 50 mL crucible with a lid. The thermal polymerization was conducted in a maffle furnace at 600 ℃ for 2 h, and the temperature ramping rate was 5.5 ℃/min. After removing the salt by water, CNK was collected and dried at 60 ℃ in a vacuum oven.

    10 mg of photocatalyst was dispersed in 35 mL water with 50 µmol/L EOPs under ultrasonication. The concentration of 1,1′-bis[3-(trimethylammonio)propyl]−4,4′-bipyridinium (TMAP) was 10 µmol/L. The suspension was saturated with O2 and was then subjected to 420 nm irradiation with light intensity of 25 mW/cm2. The suspension was sampled at specified time interval, and the aliquot was filtered for collecting the filtrate. The concentration of the hydrogen peroxide in the filtrate was determined by DPD/POD method reported elsewhere [44].

    The ionic polymeric CNK is efficient in solar-driven 2e ORR for H2O2 production, and 30 min photocatalytic reaction generates 3.1 mmol/L H2O2, as shown in Fig. 1. For construction of the surface complexed ionic polarization sites, a series of pyridinium ions with various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing functional groups are examined in the photocatalytic H2O2 production reaction, so as to correlate the structural features in molecular level with the photocatalytic performances of the complex reaction systems. Based on the intensity of the pyridinium ions for impacting the catalytic performance of CNK in H2O2 photo-production, the pyridinium ions were roughly classified into 5 groups (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 1, bipyridine molecule and the bipyridinium ions with strong electron withdrawing nitro-group obviously impede the photocatalytic performance of CNK. In contrast, the diquat cation and 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bipyridium cation have the similar impact on the enhancement of the photocatalytic performance of CNK, affording 3.8 mmol/L H2O2 in 30 min photo-reaction. The bipyridinium ions in Group 3 pose stronger impact on the photocatalytic performance of CNK than the cations in Group 2, and 30 min photo-reaction could generate around 4.4 mmol/L H2O2. Among the tested ionic compounds, methyl viologen and TMAP cations show the highest capacity in boosting the catalytic performance of CNK in photocatalytic H2O2 production, the H2O2 concentration after 30 min photo-irradiation could reach a high value of around 5.0 mmol/L. A survey on the photocatalytic performance of CNK in the presence of various bipyridinium ions reveals the dependence of the photocatalytic activity on the molecular configuration of pyridinium ions; roughly speaking, the electron-richness of the pyridinium ion is beneficial to an efficient photocatalytic performance of CNK.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Photocatalytic H2O2 production performance of CNK in the presence of a series of pyridinium ions with various electron withdrawing and electron donating groups for the formation of surface polarization sites. Reaction conditions: 10 mg CNK in 35 mL of aqueous solution of ethanol (5% v/v) in the presence of 10.0 µmol/L pyridinium ions if any; light source, solar simulation with 420 nm band-pass filter and the light intensity was 25 mW/cm2.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) Photo-production of H2O2 as a function of the concentration of 1,1′-bis[3-(trimethylammonio)propyl]−4,4′-bipyridinium (TMAP) cations. (b) Exploration of the role of surface-complexed TMAP for boosting the photocatalytic H2O2 production (See Supporting information for experimental details). (c) Apparent quantum yield of the TMAP/CNK photocatalyzed reaction system for H2O2 photo-production via 2e ORR. (d) Long-term running performance of TMAP-CNK photocatalytic reaction system. Detailed reaction condition is in the Experimental Section in Supporting information.

    For further exploring the rationale behind the enhancement of the catalytic performance of CNK, the following experimental investigations were conducted in the optimum reaction system, that is TMAP-CNK. As shown in Fig. 2a, photo-production of H2O2 increases with TMAP concentration and then reaches a plateau after a very low TMAP concentration of 4 µmol/L, revealing the powerful impact of TMAP on the photocatalytic behavior of CNK in 2e ORR. TMAP is inactive under visible light irradiation for photocatalytic H2O2 production (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). Further investigation was focused on whether the surface complexed TMAP or the free TMAP in the solution that is contributing positively to the enhancement of the photocatalytic performance. As shown in Fig. 2b, with CNK as the photocatalyst, [H2O2] reaches 3.8 mmol/L after a 30 min light irradiation. While in the reaction system with coexisting of 10 µmol/L TMAP and CNK, H2O2 concentration reaches 6.7 mmol/L, corresponding to a H2O2 production rate of 46.8 µmol per milligram catalyst in 1 h (µmol h−1 mg−1). Then, a freshly prepared suspension with CNK and 10 µmol/L TMAP was keep in dark for 1 h to reach adsorption equilibrium; the solid photocatalyst and the solution was then separated by filtration. The filtered solid photocatalyst was then dispersed in a fresh aqueous solution with 5.0% v/v ethanol, and 30 min light irradiation on this reaction system affords 6.5 mmol/L H2O2, which is close to that in the reaction system of fresh CNK + 10 µmol/L TMAP. In contrast, the reaction system with the filtrate and fresh CNK produce 3.4 mmol/L H2O2, which is close to the reaction system with CNK only. These experiments reveal that enhanced photocatalytic performance of the reaction system is attributed to the CNK with surface complexed TMAP. Additionally, the ionic feature of CNK is important, as the TMAP can only slightly improve the performance of the ion-free neutral carbon nitride (CN) framework (Fig. S2 in Supporting information).

    The stability of H2O2 in the photocatalytic reaction system is measured, and 1 h photocatalytic reaction in the presence of CNK results in the deposition of 10% of H2O2 (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). It is interesting that H2O2 decomposition is attenuated by the formation of surface ionic local polarization sites on CNK, and there is only 5% of H2O2 decomposed in TMAP-CNK photocatalyzed reaction system after 1 h light irradiation. Attenuated H2O2 decomposition is favorable for the accumulation of H2O2 in the reaction system. The AQY was measured for evaluating the efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction system under the monochromatic irradiation. As shown in Fig. 2c, the reaction system of TMAP-CNK afford a remarkable AQY of 77.5% and 64.9% at the wavelength of 405 and 420 nm, respectively, demonstrating the powerful capacity of the ionic interaction within the surface-complex of TMAP-CNK in enhancing the photon-to-chemical conversion performance. The performance of TMAP-CNK system was then measured for a prolonged irradiation, and a high H2O2 concentration of 33.2 mmol/L was achieved after 12 h of light irradiation (Fig. 2d).

    With some of selected EOPs as the electron/proton donor, CNK and TMAP-CNK were employed as the photocatalysts for simultaneous EOPs degradation and H2O2 production (Fig. 3). As shown in Figs. 3a2 and a3 and Fig. S4 (Supporting information), in TMPA-CNK photocatalyzed reaction system, BPA, an endocrine disruptor pervasively detected in aquatic environment, could be eliminated within 60 min, while there are 20.9% BPA residual in the CNK photocatalyzed reaction system. Consistently, the concentrations of H2O2 were 153.7 µmol/L and 91.7 µmol/L, respectively, in TMAP-CNK and CNK photocatalyzed reaction systems. Similarly, TMAP-CNK shows significantly higher catalytic performance in terms of H2O2 generation and antibiotics degradation. Particularly, in the case with sulfamethoxazole as the electron/proton donor (Fig. 3c), 30 min photocatalytic reaction with TMAP-CNK generated 82.9 µmol/L H2O2, which is nearly 4 times of that in the CNK photocatalyzed reaction system. In the cases with tetracycline and oxytetracycline as the target pollutants, the degradation rates of the antibiotics are very close, while the obvious distinctions in H2O2 generation are speaking repeatedly for the essential contribution of the surface-complexed TMAP to the enhancement of photon-to-chemical conversion efficiency.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Photocatalytic H2O2 production and degradation of bisphenol A (Row a), ciprofloxacin (Row b), sulfamethoxazole (Row c), tetracycline (Row d), and oxytetracycline (Row e). Molecular structure of the EOPs (Column 1), comparison of TMAP-CNK and CNK in photocatalytic degradation of EOPs (Column 2) and H2O2 photo-production (Column 3). Reaction conditions: 10 mg CNK in 35 mL aqueous solution in the presence of 10 µmol/L TMAP; pollutants concentration: 50 µmol/L; light source, solar simulation with 420 nm band-pass filter and the light intensity was 25 mW/cm2.

    We then attempted to explore the rationale behind the enhancement of photocatalytic performance by the surface-complexed ionic local polarization sites. TMAP-CNK was prepared by filtration of the aqueous suspension with CNK and 10 µmol/L TMAP, followed by drying in a vacuum oven. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis on samples of TMAP-CNK and CNK reveals that the amount of TMAP complexed on the surface of CNK is too low to be detected by XPS (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). The following compassion of TMAP-CNK and CNK via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) also shows no detectable differences (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). Moreover, the formation of surface ionic local polarization sites poses no impact on the layer stacking structure of CNK, as evidenced by the X-ray diffraction patterns of CNK and TMAP-CNK (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). We then focused on the impact of the low amount of surface complexed TMAP on the photophysical properties of samples. First, the UV–vis spectroscopy was employed for detecting the impact of the local polarization sites on the photon absorption properties of the samples. As shown in Fig. 4a, after the formation of surface ionic local polarization sites, the absorption of TMAP-CNK is more intensive than that of CNK, but the absorption edge is not impacted. An enhanced photon absorption is a favorable feature as it is the initial step of photocatalysis and is fuelling the whole chemical/energy conversion process. Moreover, by XPS, valence band position of evidenced to be the same for both CNK and TMAP-CNK.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) Diffuse reflectance spectra of the CNK and TMAP-CNK. (b) Steady-state photoluminance spectroscopy of CNK with various amount of TMAP complexed on the surface. Materials preparation: a specific amount of TMAP was loaded on 300 mg of CNK via wet impregnation method, and 9.9 nmol TMAP on 300 mg CNK is corresponding to the sample denoted by TMAP-CNK. (c) Transient photoluminance spectroscopy of CNK and TMAP-CNK. (d) Transient absorption spectroscopy of TMAP-CNK and CNK in ns–µs time scale. (e) Photocurrent of CNK with various amount of surface complexed TMAP.

    After photon absorption, part of the excited states could relax to the ground state via photoluminescence (PL), while the other excited states will transit to non-emissive state via charge trapping [45]. We thus performed steady-state and transient PL spectroscopy for evaluating the situation of the trapped charges [46]. As shown in Fig. 4b, CNK shows a strong PL emission peak at 470 nm. It is noteworthy that the intensity of PL emission peak decreases with the amount of TMAP on the surface of CNK, demonstrating the contribution of surface ionic local polarization site on attenuation of the emissive decay of the excited states. Together with the DRS analysis, a combined enhanced photon absorption and decreased emissive decay of TMAP-CNK collectively results in higher amount of non-emissive state in TMAP-CNK than in CNK framework. For further understanding the behavior of the emissive decay process, time-resolved PL spectroscopy was employed for analyzing the decay kinetics, and the lifetime of the emissive decay was determined to be 4.9 ns and 4.1 ns for CNK and TMAP-CNK, respectively (Fig. 4c). The shortened PL emission lifetime and lowered PL emission intensity of TMAP-CNK as compare to those of CNK demonstrate fast quenching of the luminescence and reduced exciton recombination resulting from the formation of local polarization sites [47,48].

    It is the non-emissive trapped electrons that are potentially capable of initiating the interfacial charge transfer reaction after diffusing to the surface of the photocatalyst. Quantitative analysis on the population and decay kinetics of non-emissive trapped electrons in the presence of surface adsorbed dioxygen was then analyzed by a transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS). As shown in Fig. 4d, the amplitude of TAS signal of TMAP-CNK could reach a high value of 132 mOD, which is roughly 3 times of that in the spectra of CNK (44 mOD), which is consistent with the DRS analysis and demonstrates a higher population of the excited states in TMAP-CNK than in CNK. Moreover, the lifetime of the trapped electron in CNK is around 11.9 ns, while trapped electrons in TMAP-CNK lasts much longer than that in CNK, presenting lifetime of 17.5 ns in the first stage and 211.0 ns in the second stage. The long-lived electrons in the TMAP-CNK are capable of diffusing to the surface and initiating the chemical conversion reaction, and thereby contributing to an enhanced photocatalytic performance in 2e ORR. For further evaluating the impact of the surface ionic local polarization sites on the charge separation, the photocurrent measurement was performed in a three-electrode photochemical cell. Fig. 4e shows obviously increase of the photocurrent with the amount of TMAP on CNK, revealing that the presence of surface polarization sites could finally results in higher amount of electrons that could reach the surface for chemical conversion reactions.

    The reaction mechanism of the photocatalytic O2 reduction for H2O2 production was tentatively explored by a series of quenching reaction and spectroscopic analysis. Firstly, the impact of the atmosphere on the H2O2 photo-production was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5a, under oxygen atmosphere, TMAP-CNK photocatalyzed reaction generates 10.2 mmol/L H2O2 in 1 h; while in the air atmosphere, H2O2 production decreases to 7.7 mmol/L under the otherwise same reaction condition. There is only 0.4 mmol/L of H2O2 generated under N2 atmosphere, which may result from the reduction of the residue O2 in the suspension. These experiments demonstrate the critical role of oxygen as the source for H2O2 production. Secondly, the generation of H2O2 is completely impeded when para-benzoquinone, an effective superoxide radical scavenger, is added, proving that the superoxide radical is an important stage during H2O2 formation [49]. Thirdly, L-histidine is able be quench the singlet oxygen, and the photocatalytic reaction in the presence of L-histidine generates a low amount of H2O2, revealing that the singlet oxygen is one of the critical intermediates during the formation of H2O2 [50]. Lastly, the H2O2 generation is negligible in the absence of ethanol, demonstrating the critical role of the electron/proton donor (either ethanol or EOPs).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) Quenching experiments in the TMAP-CNK photocatalyzed 2e ORR. mM is mmol/L. (b) Electron spin resonance spectra with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-Oxide (DMPO) as the spin-trapping agent for probing the hydroxyl radical. (c) Electron spin resonance spectra with 5–tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) as the spin-trapping agent for detecting superoxide radical. (d) Electron spin resonance spectra with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) as the spin-trapping agent for probing singlet oxygen.

    Further probing of the intermediates was performed using electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy. As shown in the ESR spectra collected with spin trapping agent of 5, 5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) for probing hydroxyl radical in aqueous system, no obvious resonance signal is observed, indicating that no hydroxyl radical (OH) forms in the reaction (Fig. 5b). Using 5–tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) as the spin trapping agent, the quartet signal collected by ESR spectrometer, demonstrating the production of superoxide radical (O2•−) under light irradiation (Fig. 5c). Additionally, using 2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) as the spin-trapping agent for probing singlet oxygen, ESR spectrum collected in TMAP-CNK photocatalyzed reaction system presents a characteristic triplet signal of TEMPO, revealing the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2) (Fig. 5d). The ESR studies are in line with the abovementioned quenching reactions. Based on the mechanistic investigations and the previous reports, it is thus proposed that O2•− could be oxidatively converted to 1O2, and the following reaction with proton/electron donor (ethanol or EOPs) could generate H2O2 [27,5153].

    Targeting on boosting the efficiency of photocatalytic H2O2 production to a high level, the strategy of using local polarization induced energetically downhill process to enhance exciton dissociation was developed in this work. On an already highly activity CN with K+ induced local polarization in the bulk, bipyridinium cation was complexed on the surface for inducing additional surface polarization centers. Due to the combination of polarization centers both in bulk and on surface, the complex photocatalyst of TMAP-CNK exhibited superior photocatalytic performance in selective 2e ORR for H2O2 generation, affording a remarkable AQY of 77.5% with ethanol as the proton/electron donor. A prolonged photocatalytic reaction afforded H2O2 with a high concentration of 33.5 mmol/L. The surface-complexed local polarization sites were evidenced to contribute essentially to the enhanced photon absorption, impeded emissive decay, boosted quantity of long-lived non-emissive excited states. All these favorable impacts led to the promotion of the photocatalytic performance in simultaneous photocatalytic H2O2 production and EOPs degradation. The conclusion in this work could shed light on the design of highly efficient photocatalysts via fabrication of delicate local polarization centers on the surface.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Financial supports by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21976041), Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (No. 202201020168), Tertiary Education Scientific Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Education Bureau (No. 202235238), and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2023A1515010788) are acknowledged.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109526.


    1. [1]

      F. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Huang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107523. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.037

    2. [2]

      Q. Wang, G. Zhang, W. Xing, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202307930. doi: 10.1002/anie.202307930

    3. [3]

      Q. Deng, H. Li, W. Hu, W. Hou, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202314213. doi: 10.1002/anie.202314213

    4. [4]

      C. Merschjann, S. Tschierlei, T. Tyborski, et al., Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 7993–7999. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503448

    5. [5]

      C. Sun, Z. Wu, Z. Hu, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 10 (2017) 1784–1791. doi: 10.1039/C7EE00601B

    6. [6]

      O.V. Mikhnenko, P.W.M. Blom, T.Q. Nguyen, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015) 1867–1888. doi: 10.1039/C5EE00925A

    7. [7]

      H. Wang, S. Jiang, S. Chen, et al., Chem. Sci. 8 (2017) 4087–4092. doi: 10.1039/C7SC00307B

    8. [8]

      H. Wang, X. Sun, D. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 2468–2473. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12878

    9. [9]

      A. De Sio, F. Troiani, M. Maiuri, et al., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 13742. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13742

    10. [10]

      T.M. Clarke, J.R. Durrant, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6736–6767. doi: 10.1021/cr900271s

    11. [11]

      Y. Wang, A. Vogel, M. Sachs, et al., Nat. Energy 4 (2019) 746–760. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0456-5

    12. [12]

      A. Yamakata, M. Yoshida, J. Kubota, M. Osawa, K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 11351–11357. doi: 10.1021/ja203639q

    13. [13]

      D. Veldman, Ö. İpek, S.C.J. Meskers, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 7721–7735. doi: 10.1021/ja8012598

    14. [14]

      H. Lin, J. Wang, J. Zhao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202117645. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117645

    15. [15]

      J. Kosco, M. Bidwell, H. Cha, et al., Nat. Mater. 19 (2020) 559–565. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0591-1

    16. [16]

      Z.A. Lan, G. Zhang, X. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 10236–10240. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904904

    17. [17]

      H. Ou, X. Chen, L. Lin, Y. Fang, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 8729–8733. doi: 10.1002/anie.201803863

    18. [18]

      Z.A. Lan, M. Wu, Z. Fang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 16355–16359. doi: 10.1002/anie.202103992

    19. [19]

      L. Dai, A. Dong, X. Meng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202300224. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300224

    20. [20]

      J. Yang, A. Acharjya, M.Y. Ye, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 19797–19803. doi: 10.1002/anie.202104870

    21. [21]

      C. Wu, Z. Teng, C. Yang, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2110266. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110266

    22. [22]

      H. Wang, C. Yang, F. Chen, G. Zheng, Q. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202202328. doi: 10.1002/anie.202202328

    23. [23]

      Z. Yu, X. Yue, J. Fan, Q. Xiang, ACS Catal. 12 (2022) 6345–6358. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c01563

    24. [24]

      Y. Zhao, P. Zhang, Z. Yang, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 3701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24048-1

    25. [25]

      G. Zhang, L. Lin, G. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 9372–9376. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804702

    26. [26]

      S. Zeng, L. Li, Z. Yang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 126 (2022) 20028–20035. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06361

    27. [27]

      Z. Yang, L. Li, J. Gao, et al., ACS EST Eng. 2 (2022) 2142–2149. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.2c00178

    28. [28]

      A. Savateev, N.V. Tarakina, V. Strauss, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 15061–15068. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004747

    29. [29]

      Z. Teng, Q. Zhang, H. Yang, et al., Nat. Catal. 4 (2021) 374–384. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00605-1

    30. [30]

      J. Liu, M. Antonietti, Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (2013) 1486–1493. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40696b

    31. [31]

      Z. Mi, T. Zhou, W. Weng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 9642–9649. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016618

    32. [32]

      K. Jiang, S. Back, A.J. Akey, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 3997. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11992-2

    33. [33]

      P. Zhang, D. Sun, A. Cho, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 904. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08763-4

    34. [34]

      S.N. Lou, J. Lim, T.H. Jeon, W. Choi, ACS EST Eng. 2 (2022) 1116–1129. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.2c00009

    35. [35]

      C. Dong, Y. Yang, X. Hu, et al., Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 4982. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32410-0

    36. [36]

      J. Xu, Q. Zhang, X. Gao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202307018. doi: 10.1002/anie.202307018

    37. [37]

      Y. Wu, H. Che, B. Liu, Y. Ao, Small Struct. 4 (2023) 2200371. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202200371

    38. [38]

      Y. Zhao, M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 9336–9340. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703438

    39. [39]

      Y. Zhao, M. Shalom, M. Antonietti, Appl. Catal. B 207 (2017) 311–315. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.044

    40. [40]

      J. Qin, J. Barrio, G. Peng, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 4701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18535-0

    41. [41]

      S. Mazzanti, G. Manfredi, A.J. Barker, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 11109–11116. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02909

    42. [42]

      P.Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, D.D. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 318 (2022) 121749. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121749

    43. [43]

      Z. Yang, L. Li, S. Zeng, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 (2023) 8232–8240. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c22366

    44. [44]

      G. h. Moon, W. Kim, A.D. Bokare, N.e. Sung, W. Choi, Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014) 4023–4028. doi: 10.1039/C4EE02757D

    45. [45]

      K.L. Corp, C.W. Schlenker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 7904–7912. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02869

    46. [46]

      C. Merschjann, T. Tyborski, S. Orthmann, et al., Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 205204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.205204

    47. [47]

      P. Kumar, E. Vahidzadeh, U.K. Thakur, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 5415–5436. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00144

    48. [48]

      Q. Liang, Z. Li, Z.H. Huang, F. Kang, Q.H. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 (2015) 6885–6892. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503221

    49. [49]

      M. Hayyan, M.A. Hashim, I.M. AlNashef, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 3029–3085. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00407

    50. [50]

      E.T. Yun, J.H. Lee, J. Kim, H.D. Park, J. Lee, Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (2018) 7032–7042. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00959

    51. [51]

      J. Luo, C. Fan, L. Tang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 301 (2022) 120757. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120757

    52. [52]

      W. Liu, P. Wang, J. Chen, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2205119. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202205119

    53. [53]

      Z. Yang, L. Li, J. Cui, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 28 (2022) e202202122.

  • Figure 1  Photocatalytic H2O2 production performance of CNK in the presence of a series of pyridinium ions with various electron withdrawing and electron donating groups for the formation of surface polarization sites. Reaction conditions: 10 mg CNK in 35 mL of aqueous solution of ethanol (5% v/v) in the presence of 10.0 µmol/L pyridinium ions if any; light source, solar simulation with 420 nm band-pass filter and the light intensity was 25 mW/cm2.

    Figure 2  (a) Photo-production of H2O2 as a function of the concentration of 1,1′-bis[3-(trimethylammonio)propyl]−4,4′-bipyridinium (TMAP) cations. (b) Exploration of the role of surface-complexed TMAP for boosting the photocatalytic H2O2 production (See Supporting information for experimental details). (c) Apparent quantum yield of the TMAP/CNK photocatalyzed reaction system for H2O2 photo-production via 2e ORR. (d) Long-term running performance of TMAP-CNK photocatalytic reaction system. Detailed reaction condition is in the Experimental Section in Supporting information.

    Figure 3  Photocatalytic H2O2 production and degradation of bisphenol A (Row a), ciprofloxacin (Row b), sulfamethoxazole (Row c), tetracycline (Row d), and oxytetracycline (Row e). Molecular structure of the EOPs (Column 1), comparison of TMAP-CNK and CNK in photocatalytic degradation of EOPs (Column 2) and H2O2 photo-production (Column 3). Reaction conditions: 10 mg CNK in 35 mL aqueous solution in the presence of 10 µmol/L TMAP; pollutants concentration: 50 µmol/L; light source, solar simulation with 420 nm band-pass filter and the light intensity was 25 mW/cm2.

    Figure 4  (a) Diffuse reflectance spectra of the CNK and TMAP-CNK. (b) Steady-state photoluminance spectroscopy of CNK with various amount of TMAP complexed on the surface. Materials preparation: a specific amount of TMAP was loaded on 300 mg of CNK via wet impregnation method, and 9.9 nmol TMAP on 300 mg CNK is corresponding to the sample denoted by TMAP-CNK. (c) Transient photoluminance spectroscopy of CNK and TMAP-CNK. (d) Transient absorption spectroscopy of TMAP-CNK and CNK in ns–µs time scale. (e) Photocurrent of CNK with various amount of surface complexed TMAP.

    Figure 5  (a) Quenching experiments in the TMAP-CNK photocatalyzed 2e ORR. mM is mmol/L. (b) Electron spin resonance spectra with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-Oxide (DMPO) as the spin-trapping agent for probing the hydroxyl radical. (c) Electron spin resonance spectra with 5–tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) as the spin-trapping agent for detecting superoxide radical. (d) Electron spin resonance spectra with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) as the spin-trapping agent for probing singlet oxygen.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  48
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2024-10-15
  • 收稿日期:  2023-10-11
  • 接受日期:  2024-01-12
  • 修回日期:  2023-12-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-21
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章