Fluorescent MOF-based nanozymes for discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers and ratiometric sensing of o-phenylenediamine

Yinghui Xia Kunming Sun Ya-Nan Zuo Shuyun Zhu Xian-En Zhao

Citation:  Yinghui Xia, Kunming Sun, Ya-Nan Zuo, Shuyun Zhu, Xian-En Zhao. Fluorescent MOF-based nanozymes for discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers and ratiometric sensing of o-phenylenediamine[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022, 33(4): 2081-2085. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.083 shu

Fluorescent MOF-based nanozymes for discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers and ratiometric sensing of o-phenylenediamine

English

  • Bifunctional NH2-MIL-101(Fe) was utilized for phenylenediamine isomers discrimination and detection for the first time.

    Discriminating structural isomers of organic compounds have always been a challenging task in environmental fields because they possess similar physical and chemical properties resulting from the subtle distinctions in the structures [13]. o-Phenylenediamine (OPD), m-phenylenediamine (MPD), and p-phenylenediamine (PPD) are three isomers of phenylenediamines that have been used as precursors in various fields including plastics production, pharmaceuticals and industrial dyes [4,5]. However, their damages to the human health and environment upon prolonged exposure are different. OPD is a highly toxic and carcinogenic environmental pollutant [6,7]. PPD can cause various immediate allergic reactions [8]. MPD does not lead to obvious harmful effects. A number of methods have been applied for the discrimination of phenylenediamines such as chromatography [9,10], chromatography-mass spectrometry [11,12] and capillary electrophoresis [13]. These approaches can realize the detection of three phenylenediamines at the same time, but they need complicated sample pretreatments and high operation cost.

    As an alternative, fluorescence strategies have drawn wide interest owing to their simplicity, easy operation and high sensitivity [14,15]. For example, Lai and coworkers synthesized the fluorescent quinoxaline through a tandem reaction for the detection of OPD [16]. Ngeontae's group designed a fluorometric sensor for PPD based on alizarin-boronic acid adduct [17]. Wang's group constructed a fluorescent sensor for PPD on the basis of amine-aldehyde condensation reaction by using 1-pyrenecarboxaldehyde as a probe [18]. Although these methods exhibit high sensitivity, they analyze only one phenylenediamine isomer. It still remains a great challenge to design a fluorescence strategy for the identification and detection of the three phenylenediamines. Moreover, these strategies are based on single signal output, and the results are influenced easily by excitation light source and external environmental conditions. Fortunately, the ratiometric fluorescent strategy, which is based on dual-signal measurement simultaneously, can overcome such drawbacks [19,20]. Fluorescent nanomaterials hold great promise to construct ratiometric assays [2123]. Generally speaking, most nanoprobe-based ratiometric systems are composed of two different kinds of nanoprobes. Undoubtedly, the synthesis procedures for two different kinds of nanomaterials are complex and time-consuming. Thus, some scientists shift their focus to the design and synthesis of bifunctional fluorophores.

    Fluorescent nanozymes can function as not only fluorescence reporters but also peroxidase mimics, which can catalyze the oxidation of nonfluorescent substate into luminophore with the assistance of H2O2. Thus, these fluorescent nanozymes combined with substrate of peroxidase can display dual-emission with single excitation. Up to date, various fluorescent nanozymes including functional carbon dots (CDs) [24], graphitic carbon nitride (C3N4) [25,26], gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) [27] and copper nanoclusters (CuNCs) [28] have been used to construct ratiometric assays. However, the research about fluorescent nanozymes is in the embryo stage. It is necessary to design novel fluorescent nanozymes and apply them in ratiometric sensing.

    Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly porous materials assembled by metal clusters and organic ligands which endow them with multiple functions [2931]. The usage of organic ligands can make MOFs attractive optical properties while the unsaturated metallic nodes allow MOFs to exhibit excellent biomimetic catalytic activity [32,33]. It has been reported that NH2-MIL-101(Fe) exhibits two functions, in which the 2-aminoterephthalic acid ligand (1,4-BDC-NH2) and Fe node make the framework a blue photoluminescence and peroxidase-mimetic catalytic activity, respectively. Bifunctional NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based ratiometric fluorescence assays for pesticide [34] and acid phosphatase activity [35] have been developed. However, no fluorescence sensor has been developed for discriminating phenylenediamine isomers and ratiometric detection of OPD with bifunctional NH2-MIL-101(Fe).

    Here, we fabricate a fluorescence sensing platform to discriminate three aromatic amines (OPD, MPD, and PPD) and detect OPD ratiometrically with bifunctional MOF (Fig. 1). The NH2-MIL-101(Fe) exhibits an intrinsic fluorescence at 445 nm ascribed to 1,4-BDC-NH2 linker. Simultaneously, the Fe-O clusters endow NH2-MIL-101(Fe) with peroxidase-like activity to activate H2O2 to produce OH radicals, which oxidize colorless OPD into its oxidized products (OPDox) with strong fluorescence emission at 574 nm. The generated OPDox can in turn quench the fluorescence of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) via inner filter effect (IFE). With F574/F445 as readout, OPD can be detected ratiometrically. PPD can be oxidized by produced OH to its oxidized form (PPDox), which just quenches the fluorescence of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) via IFE without the generation of new emission peak. The introduction of MPD cannot induce obvious change for the fluorescence of NH2-MIL-101(Fe). Thus, OPD, MPD and PPD can be discriminated effectively with fluorescent NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozyme.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers based on fluorescent NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozyme.

    NH2-MIL-101(Fe) was synthesized by typical solvothermal process according to the previous paper [34,35]. The preparation process of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) can be found in Supporting Information. Fig. 2A shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) characteristic peaks of the obtained NH2-MIL-101(Fe) are in agreement with a simulation of MIL-101 [36]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image shows that NH2-MIL-101(Fe) displays a typical octahedral morphology with a diameter around 400 nm (Fig. 2B). Fig. S1 (Supporting information) shows the FT-IR spectra of both NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and 1,4-BDC-NH2. Two peaks at 3400 cm−1 are observed ascribed to symmetrical and asymmetrical stretching vibrations of amine [37]. The peak at 1651 cm−1 indicates the presence of carboxyl group. In comparison with ligand, a peak at 571 cm−1 indicates the existence of Fe-O bond in MOFs. The full X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) shows that NH2-MIL-101(Fe) is composed of Fe, N, O and C (Fig. 2C). The Fe 2p XPS indicates that the Fe element is composed of Fe2+ and Fe3+ (Fig. 2D). This Fe3+/Fe2+ redox endows NH2-MIL-101(Fe) with peroxidase-like activity [34].

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (A) XRD profiles of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and simulated MIL-101(Fe). (B) SEM image of NH2-MIL-101(Fe). (C) and (D) show the full XPS and Fe 2p XPS of NH2-MIL-101(Fe), respectively

    It is supposed that NH2-MIL-101(Fe) is photoluminescent ascribed to the ligand. As expected, NH2-MIL-101(Fe) exhibits a strong fluorescence at 445 nm which is consistent with that of 1,4-BDC-NH2 (Fig. S2A in Supporting information). The results indicate that the fluorescence property of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) derives from ligand. Moreover, the fluorescence emissions of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) under different excitation wavelengths were investigated. The fluorescence intensity decreases gradually with increasing excitation wavelengths from 360 nm to 400 nm (Fig. S2B in Supporting information), which is consistent with the previous report [34]. The feasibility for discriminating phenylenediamines with fluorescent NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozymes was examined. As presented in Fig. 3A, only NH2-MIL-101(Fe) exhibits a blue emission at 445 nm upon exciting at 375 nm (curve a, vial a). After introducing H2O2 and OPD, the emission signal at 445 nm decreases while a new emission ascribed to OPDox appears at 574 nm (curve b). The solution exhibits orange-yellow fluorescence under ultraviolet light (vial b). The emission at 445 nm is quenched obviously without the appearance of new peak with H2O2 and PPD (curve c, vial c). However, the introduction of H2O2 and MPD causes slight change for the emission of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (curve d, vial d). In contrast, the emission signals of MOF keep almost unchanged with any phenylenediamines (Fig. S3 in Supporting information).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (a) and NH2-MIL-101(Fe) in the presence of H2O2 and OPD (b), H2O2 and PPD (c), and H2O2 and MPD (d). Inset: the corresponding photos under ultraviolet light. (B) UV-vis spectra of H2O2 + OPD (a), H2O2 + PPD (b), H2O2 + MPD (c), H2O2 + OPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (d), H2O2 + PPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (e) and H2O2 + MPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (f). Inset: the corresponding photos under daylight. (C) UV-vis absorption spectra of OPDox as well as PPDox and emission spectrum of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) under the excitation wavelength of 375 nm. (D) PL decay of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) in the absence and presence of H2O2-OPD and H2O2-PPD.

    UV-vis absorption spectra were studied to further prove the discrimination of phenylenediamines with NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozymes (Fig. 3B). Upon the addition of H2O2, a weak absorption peak at 435 nm for OPD and 490 nm for PPD is observed, corresponding to OPDox and PPDox, respectively. In contrast, there is no obvious absorption peak for MPD with the coexistence of H2O2. Furthermore, when NH2-MIL-101(Fe) coexists with OPD + H2O2/PPD + H2O2, absorbance at both 435 nm and 490 nm increases remarkably. However, there is no obvious absorption in the systems of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) + OPD, NH2-MIL-101(Fe) + PPD, NH2-MIL-101(Fe) + MPD and NH2-MIL-101(Fe) + H2O2 (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). These results indicated NH2-MIL-101(Fe) can catalyze the oxidation of OPD and PPD easily with the assistance of H2O2 [38,39]. Experiments were performed to further prove the generation of hydroxyl radicals (OH) during the catalytic oxidation. As a scavenger for OH radicals, thiourea is added into the NH2-MIL-101(Fe)- H2O2-OPD system. As presented in Fig. S5 (Supporting information), the emission signal at 574 nm decreases gradually with the increasing concentration of thiourea, showing that OH is indeed produced in this system and involves in phenylenediamine oxidation reaction. All the results further indicate that the three phenylenediamines can be discriminated with fluorescent NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozymes.

    Then, we investigated the response mechanism of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system for phenylenediamines. As presented in Fig. 3C, the absorption spectra of both OPDox and PPDox exhibit a large overlap with the emission spectrum of NH2-MIL-101(Fe). Furthermore, the fluorescent lifetime (τ) measurements were performed to investigate their interaction with the results exhibited in Fig. 3D. The fluorescence decay profile of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) changes slightly with OPDox/PPDox. The τ of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) in the absence and presence of OPDox and PPDox is 14.1 ± 0.24 ns, 13.77 ± 0.37 ns and 13.68 ± 0.25 ns, respectively. Thus, energy or electron transfer is excluded. All the above results meet the conditions of inner filter effect (IFE). Therefore, we conclude that NH2-MIL-101(Fe) is quenched by OPDox/PPDox via IFE.

    To improve the sensitivity of this assay for OPD, several factors such as reaction time, pH, concentration of H2O2 and amount of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) were optimized. The best reaction time, pH, concentration of H2O2 and amount of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) is 60 min, 5.0, 20 mmol/L, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). Under optimal conditions, with the increasing concentration of OPD, the emission signals at 445 nm decrease whereas those at 574 nm increase (Fig. 4A). The F574/F445 is proportional to the concentration of OPD from 5 µmol/L to 1200 µmol/L with the regression equation of F574/F445 = 0.0995 + 0.00324 COPD (R2 = 0.993) (Fig. 4B). The limit of detection (LOD) is calculated to be 1.5 µmol/L (S/N = 3). Similarly, the fluorescence at 445 nm decreases gradually when PPD concentration increases (Fig. 4C). With the ΔF = F0F (F0 and F is the fluorescence intensity of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system without and with PPD, respectively) as readout, two linear calibration curves are achieved for PPD in the range of 5-100 µmol/L (R2 = 0.998) and 100-1000 µmol/L (R2 = 0.990), respectively (Fig. 4D). The LOD for PPD is calculated to be 1.0 µmol/L (S/N = 3). Compared with colorimetric methods for discriminating phenylenediamine isomers, this fluorescent method has wider linear range and lower LOD [39,40] (Table S1 in Supporting information). Moreover, most fluorescent methods can detect only one phenylenediamine [4,16,17,41] while this strategy can realize the detection of OPD and PPD (Table S1).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system with varied concentrations of OPD (0, 5, 20, 50, 100, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1200 μmol/L). (B) Linear relationship between F574/F445 and OPD concentration. (C) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system with varied concentrations of PPD (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 55, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 μmol/L). (D) Linear relationship between ΔF and PPD concentration.

    The reproducibility of this assay was investigated by repetitive analysis of OPD and PPD at the identical and different batches. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the intra-assay were 2.34% (n = 5) for 0.5 mmol/L OPD and 3.12% (n = 5) for 0.5 mmol/L PPD at the same-batch sensors. The batch-to-batch reproducibility was also investigated by six parallel prepared NH2-MIL-101(Fe). The RSDs were 4.6% and 5.1% for 0.5 mmol/L OPD and 0.5 mmol/L PPD, respectively. These results demonstrate the satisfactory reproducibility of the designed assay. In addition, the stability of this assay was evaluated. The fluorescence responses of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) towards OPD and PPD with the same concentration (0.5 mmol/L) were recorded after the NH2-MIL-101(Fe) was kept at 4 ℃ for 60 days. The assay retains 97% and 95% of its initial responses for OPD and PPD, respectively, indicating that this assay exhibits good stability.

    To examine the selectivity of this strategy for sensing OPD and PPD, control experiments were carried out using potential interferences including Fe3+, Ca2+, Zn2+, NO3, SO42−, tryptophan (Trp), tyrosine (Tyr), phenylalanine (Phe), ascorbic acid (AA), glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys), phenol, 3-nitrophenol (3-NP), 4-aminophenol (4-AP), catechol (CC), resorcinol (RC), hydroquinone (HQ), benzaldehyde (BA), aniline, melamine (MA), MPD. As presented in Fig. S7A (Supporting information), these interferences cause negligible changes for F574/F445 while the F574/F445 increases greatly in the presence of OPD. Interference experiments were also performed with the results shown in Fig. S7B (Supporting information). F574/F445 values for OPD detection remain unchanged in the presence of potential interferences except PPD. Fig. S7C (Supporting information) shows that the ΔF values caused by these interferences are much lower than that of PPD. Similarly, the interference experiments show that ΔF values for PPD detection change negligibly with potential interferences except OPD. Overall, these results demonstrate that the bifunctional NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based fluorescent assays exhibit an acceptable selectivity towards OPD and PPD. Nevertheless, if OPD and PPD coexist in a sample, they interfere with each other for the detection.

    To evaluate the practical performance of this strategy, OPD and PPD in Weishan Lake water were analyzed by standard addition method. The detailed analysis process was provided in Supporting information. As shown in Table S2 (Supporting information), the recoveries range from 94.4% to 106.9% for OPD and 93.6% to 96.2% for PPD with the RSD less than 4.0%, revealing the satisfactory reliability and accuracy. The results indicate that this method possesses the great promise in the real sample analysis.

    In summary, we have demonstrated the usage of bifunctional NH2-MIL-101(Fe) for phenylenediamine isomers discrimination and detection for the first time. The NH2-MIL-101(Fe) not only exhibits an intrinsic blue fluorescence ascribed to the fluorescent ligand but also excellent peroxidase-mimic activity due to the presence of Fe node. With the assistance of H2O2, OPD and PPD can be oxidized by NH2-MIL-101(Fe) into their corresponding products, which quench the fluorescence of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) through IFE. In addition, a new emission at 574 nm emerges for OPDox. Therefore, a ratiometric fluorescence assay for OPD is developed. The introduction of MPD cannot induce obvious change for the fluorescence of NH2-MIL-101(Fe). Thus, the three phenylenediamines can be discriminated with NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system. This fabricated nanosensor has been successfully utilized to identify OPD and PPD in water samples. Such a new strategy can enable fluorescence MOF-based nanozyme promising applications in environmental monitoring.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work is kindly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22076097) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2020MB066).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.083.


    1. [1]

      H.F. Wang, Y.Y. Wu, X.P. Yan, Anal. Chem. 85(2013) 1920-1925. doi: 10.1021/ac303374s

    2. [2]

      S. Samanta, C. Kar, G. Das, Anal. Chem. 87(2015) 9002-9008. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02202

    3. [3]

      F. Wang, Y. Yang, T.M. Swager, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44(2008) 8522-8524. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802762

    4. [4]

      D. Mathivanan, S.K. Tammina, X.L. Wang, Y.L. Yang, Microchim. Acta 187(2020) 292. doi: 10.1007/s00604-020-04256-0

    5. [5]

      B. Shi, J. Su, L. Zhang, et al., Nanoscale 8(2016) 10814-10822. doi: 10.1039/C6NR02725C

    6. [6]

      M. Matsumoto, M. Suzuki, H. Kano, et al., Arch. Toxicol. 86(2012) 791-804. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0800-z

    7. [7]

      A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Z. Salimi, Appl. Catal. A 390(2010) 110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.09.038

    8. [8]

      M. Gu, J. Duan, Q.Q. Mao, S.H. Zhang, J.G. Lv, Sens. Actuators. B: Chem. 287(2019) 173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.040

    9. [9]

      H. Tokuda, Y. Kimura, S. Takano, J. Chromatogr. A 367(1986) 345-356. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)94855-6

    10. [10]

      S.P. Wang, T.H. Huang, Anal. Chim. Acta 534(2005) 207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.11.038

    11. [11]

      P.G. Wang, A.J. Krynitsky, J. Chromatogr. B 879(2011) 1795-1801. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.04.030

    12. [12]

      P. Dobberstein, E. Korte, G. Meyerhoff, R. Pesch, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 46(1983) 185-188. doi: 10.1016/0020-7381(83)80084-9

    13. [13]

      S. Dong, L. Chi, S. Zhang, et al., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391(2008) 653-659. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2053-5

    14. [14]

      F. Qu, Z.W. Guo, D.F. Jiang, X.E. Zhao, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32(2021) 3368-3371. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.04.010

    15. [15]

      M. Li, B. Gurram, S. Lei, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32(2021) 1316-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.004

    16. [16]

      X.J. Lai, G.Y.S. Qiu, Q.X. Ye, R.X. Wang, J.B. Liu, J. Photochem. Photobio. A 386(2020) 112101. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112101

    17. [17]

      K. Ngamdee, S. Martwiset, T. Tuntulani, W. Ngeontae, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 173(2012) 682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.07.077

    18. [18]

      L.F. Gao, X. Lin, X. Hai, X.W. Chen, J.H. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(2018) 43049-43056. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b15837

    19. [19]

      L.Y. Liu, S.Y. Zhu, J. Sun, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32(2021) 906-909. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.015

    20. [20]

      M. Xia, X.E. Zhao, J. Sun, Z.J. Zheng, S.Y. Zhu, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 319(2020) 128321. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128321

    21. [21]

      Q.M. Qiu, H.Y. Chen, Y.X. Wang, Y.B. Ying, Coord. Chem. Rev. 387(2019) 60-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.009

    22. [22]

      Y.Y. Li, Y.N. Ban, R.H. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(2020) 443-446. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.047

    23. [23]

      M.K. Wang, D.S. Kong, D.D. Su, Y. Liu, S.G. Su, Nanoscale 11(2019) 13903-13908. doi: 10.1039/C9NR02901J

    24. [24]

      L.Z. Wang, Y. Liu, Z.P. Yang, et al., Dyes Pigm. 180(2020) 108486. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108486

    25. [25]

      X.Y. Wang, L. Qin, M.J. Lin, H. Xing, H. Wei, Anal. Chem. 91(2019) 10648-10656. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01884

    26. [26]

      W.F. Deng, Y. Peng, H. Yang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(2019) 29072-29077. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b10715

    27. [27]

      Y.N. Qin, Y.J. Sun, Y.J. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(2020) 774-778. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.09.016

    28. [28]

      S. Maity, D. Bain, S. Chakraborty, S. Kolay, A. Patra, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 8(2020) 18335-18344. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07431

    29. [29]

      J.F. Chang, X. Wang, J. Wang, H.Y. Li, F. Li, Anal. Chem. 91(2019) 3604-3610. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05599

    30. [30]

      J.F. Chang, W.X. Lv, Q. Li, H.Y. Li, F. Li, Anal. Chem. 92(2020) 8959-8964. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00952

    31. [31]

      H. Wang, X.L. Wang, R.M. Kong, L. Xia, F.L. Qu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32(2021) 198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.10.017

    32. [32]

      S.Q. Li, X.D. Liu, H.X. Chai, Y.M. Huang, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 105(2018) 391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.001

    33. [33]

      X.H. Niu, X. Li, Z.Y. Lyu, et al., Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 1338.

    34. [34]

      P. Liu, X. Liu, X.C. Xu, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 328(2021) 129024. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129024

    35. [35]

      S.Q. Li, X. Hu, Q.M. Chen, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 137(2019) 133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.05.010

    36. [36]

      J.J. Guo, S. Wu, Y. Wang, M. Zhao, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 312(2020) 128021. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128021

    37. [37]

      Z.G. Zhang, X.Y. Li, B.J. Liu, Q.D. Zhao, G.H. Chen, RSC Adv. 6(2016) 4289-4295. doi: 10.1039/C5RA23154J

    38. [38]

      B.F. Shi, Y.B. Su, L.L. Zhang, et al., Nanoscale 8(2016) 10814-10822. doi: 10.1039/C6NR02725C

    39. [39]

      L.P. Lin, Y.L. Xiao, Y.H. Wang, et al., Microchim. Acta 186(2019) 288. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-3404-y

    40. [40]

      R. Maria-Hormigos, B. Jurado-Sanchez, A. Escarpa, Anal. Chem. 90(2018) 9830-9837. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01860

    41. [41]

      Y.J. Zhao, K. Miao, Z. Zhu, L.J. Fan, ACS Sensors 2(2017) 842-847. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00245

  • Figure 1  Discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers based on fluorescent NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-based nanozyme.

    Figure 2  (A) XRD profiles of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and simulated MIL-101(Fe). (B) SEM image of NH2-MIL-101(Fe). (C) and (D) show the full XPS and Fe 2p XPS of NH2-MIL-101(Fe), respectively

    Figure 3  (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (a) and NH2-MIL-101(Fe) in the presence of H2O2 and OPD (b), H2O2 and PPD (c), and H2O2 and MPD (d). Inset: the corresponding photos under ultraviolet light. (B) UV-vis spectra of H2O2 + OPD (a), H2O2 + PPD (b), H2O2 + MPD (c), H2O2 + OPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (d), H2O2 + PPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (e) and H2O2 + MPD + NH2-MIL-101(Fe) (f). Inset: the corresponding photos under daylight. (C) UV-vis absorption spectra of OPDox as well as PPDox and emission spectrum of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) under the excitation wavelength of 375 nm. (D) PL decay of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) in the absence and presence of H2O2-OPD and H2O2-PPD.

    Figure 4  (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system with varied concentrations of OPD (0, 5, 20, 50, 100, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1200 μmol/L). (B) Linear relationship between F574/F445 and OPD concentration. (C) Fluorescence emission spectra of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)-H2O2 system with varied concentrations of PPD (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 55, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 μmol/L). (D) Linear relationship between ΔF and PPD concentration.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  445
  • HTML全文浏览量:  94
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-04-15
  • 收稿日期:  2021-06-22
  • 接受日期:  2021-08-17
  • 修回日期:  2021-07-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-08-22
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章