English

• Bioconjugation [1] plays an essential role in life science and drug development because it provides opportunity to combine the complementary advantages of biomolecules with drugs [2, 3], polymers [4-6], nanoparticles [7], and other compounds of distinct composition and function [8]. As such, they have become a major component for many biochemical and pharmaceutical applications including protein stabilization [4, 9], drug delivery [10, 11] and gene therapy [12]. To date, most bioconjugates have been produced using only a handful of chemistries that can proceed efficiently and selectively under physiological conditions. The complexity of biomacromolecules imposes stringent requirements on the reaction conditions that it can tolerate. Successful examples include thiol-Michael addition [13], thiol-ene reaction [14], and tyrosinase-mediated bioconjugation [15]. The concept of bioorthogonal reactions further expands this toolbox. Such reactions include strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition [16], Diels-Alder reaction [3, 17] and Staudinger reaction [18]. Highly reactive foreign functional groups are usually installed on biomolecules by metabolic engineering or site-selective labelling with unnatural monomers, typically with low protein yields, which limits application on a larger scale.

  Recently, genetically encoded peptide-protein chemistry, such as SpyTag-SpyCatcher reaction [19, 20], has emerged as a new way to do chemistry with proteins within the biological reactivity space [21, 22]. These reactive pairs are based entirely on natural amino acids and the reaction is compatible with physiological conditions, obviating the need for additional chemical reagents or catalysts [23]. Moreover, it is genetically encodable and can be programmed directly into the protein's sequence. The reactivity is insensitive to the location of reactive sequences in the chain. The highly selective, rapid and irreversible conjugation has made it very attractive for a variety of applications, such as protein topology engineering [24], making nanoparticle conjugates [25], engineering architecturally sophisticated supramolecular catalytic systems [26] and so on. Although this is an ideal reaction for making bioconjugates, there has been only a few reports on its use to conjugate with nonbiological compounds [27]. Since SpyTag is a 13-amino acid peptide and can be prepared by solid phase peptide synthesis, we envisioned that it could serve as a bridge for native conjugation between proteins and other synthetic compounds. The introduction of SpyTag shall provide a reactive handle for subsequent conjugation under native conditions.

  Fullerenes are fascinating carbon nanostructures [28]. Although pristine [60]fullerene (C₆₀) showed potential biological activities, it is essentially insoluble in aqueous media and thus unfavorable for application in biological environments [29]. To extend its scope of application, it is important to find water soluble C₆₀ derivatives that are readily synthesized and can be easily attached onto biomacromolecules. For example, fullerenols [C₆₀(OH)_x] display a large range of nanomedicine applications owing to their enhanced water solubility and various biological effects, including photo-sensitizing property, anti-oxidative stress, and scavenging of free radicals [30-32]. Despite their potential application as antiangiogenic agents, they are difficult to be further functionalized. It has been demonstrated that hydroxyl- or carboxylic acid-functionalized C₆₀ with precisely defined structures can serve as a hydrophilic molecular nanoparticle to drive the assembly of the conjugate. In this case, the hydrophilic nature is not revealed until deprotection after conjugation. It would be highly desirable to develop hydrophilic fullerene building blocks for making bioconjugates under native conditions.

  In this communication, we report the design, synthesis, and characterization of C₆₀-protein bioconjugates using SpyTag-SpyCatcher chemistry (Fig. 1), which provides a general and robust method for modifying proteins with C₆₀ derivatives. It is expected that the C₆₀ would strongly affect the self-assembly behaviour of proteins and the optical properties of the bioconjugate.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Synthesis of C₆₀-protein bioconjugates by "click" reaction and SpyTag-SpyCatcher chemistry.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The synthetic strategy was divided into two steps: (1) the installation of SpyTag onto C₆₀ under non-native conditions and (2) the native conjugation between SpyTag-bearing C₆₀ derivatives and SpyCatcher-bearing proteins. The first step could be accomplished by using Cu(I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition between a water-soluble, azide or alkyne-functionalized C₆₀ and cognate functional SpyTag. The synthesis of the C₆₀ derivatives are shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information). It began with the mono-functionalization of C₆₀ by stoichiometry-controlled Bingel-Hirsch reaction to install a TMS-protected alkyne group (compound 2a) or chloro group which can be easily converted to azide functionality (compound 2b). To bring in potential water solubility, multiple protected hydroxyl groups were introduced by an additional step of Bingel-Hirsch reaction to get the [1:5] adducts (compounds 4a and 4b). Then, after functional group conversion and deprotection, two "clickable" C₆₀ derivatives were obtained in decent yields (compounds 6a, DC₆₀-alkyne and 6b, DC₆₀-N₃). The synthetic procedures and detailed characterizations could be found in supporting information (Figs. S1-S9 in Supporting informaiton). Notably, before deprotection of the hydroxyl groups, the compounds are highly soluble in common organic solvents. The structures of these [60]fullerene derivatives were proven by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, IR and MALDI-TOF MS spectra. After deprotection, DC₆₀-alkyne and DC₆₀-N₃ can be easily dissolved in methanol and water.

  The "click" reaction between DC₆₀-alkyne and azide end-capped SpyTag (N₃-SpyTag) was performed in water with CuSO₄/sodium ascorbate as the catalyst at 25 ℃ to give the DC₆₀-SpyTag. The sample was dialyzed to remove the catalyst followed by freeze drying to yield a light brown-red fluffy solid. Notably, two equivalents of DC₆₀-alkyne were added to ensure complete consumption of N₃-SpyTag during the click reaction. Excess DC₆₀-alkyne was easily removed by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) during the purification process. The success of click reaction was demonstrated by the complete disappearance of the azide absorption at 2108 cm⁻¹ in the FTIR spectrum of the product (Fig. 2A). Correspondingly, a series of new peaks emerge and can be clearly assigned to the presence of new functional groups, such as 1741 cm⁻¹ for C=O and 1250 cm⁻¹ for the –(CO)–O– groups in DC₆₀. The DC₆₀-SpyTag is fully soluble in water, which shall facilitate the attachment of DC₆₀ to any SpyCatcher-containing proteins in water using SpyTag-SpyCatcher chemistry.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (A) FT-IR spectra of DC₆₀-SpyTag and N₃-SpyTag. (B) MALDI-TOF MS spectra of SpyCatcher (inset) and DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate. (C) UV-vis spectra of DC₆₀-SpyTag, DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate (the inset is the solution of the conjugate at the concentration of 1 mg/mL) and SpyCatcher. (D) TEM of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate with concentration of 10 mg/mL in water.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The reaction between DC₆₀-SpyTag and SpyCatcher was performed in PBS buffer at 25 ℃ as the model native conjugation reaction. After 12 h, the solution was purified by FPLC to remove excess DC₆₀-SpyTag. After desalting, the solution was freeze-dried to yield light brown solid for further characterization. The DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate has much better solubility in water than pure DC₆₀-alkyne. The successful preparation of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate was convincingly demonstrated in MALDI-TOF MS spectrum where only one single major distribution was observed at the m/z value of 18547 Da matching well with the calculated mass of 18567 Da for the DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate (Fig. 2B). As compared to the mass of the SpyCatcher, there is an apparent shift of molecular weight of ∼3916 Da, which is close to the calculated value of 3940 Da for one DC₆₀-SpyTag motif within experimental error.

  The UV–vis absorption characteristics of DC₆₀-SpyTag, SpyCatcher and DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate in water at the same concentration of 1.0 mg/mL were depicted in Fig. 2C. It showed typical absorption maxima in UV–vis spectroscopy between 200 nm to 600 nm for DC₆₀-SpyTag. The specific absorbing peak of SpyCatcher was at ∼200 nm. The onset of the peak of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate was calculated to be ∼400 nm. The image (Fig. 2C inset) shows the orange brown solution of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate purified by FPLC. All these show that DC₆₀moiety imparts the optical properties to the protein. TEM shows the nano-membrane of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate with isotropic distribution of DC₆₀ dots (dark phase, Fig. 2D). More pictures of the morphology could be found in Fig. S10 (Supporting information). There was no obvious ordered phase in the membrane. Hence, we proposed a random molecular distribution to account for the observed morphology as illustrated in the inset of Fig. 2D.

  To examine the generality of the approach, we designed a bifunctional protein containing multi-domains, namely, Spy-Catcher-ELP-Dronpa-ELP-SpyCatcher (BDB). Elastin-like protein (ELP) is an intrinsically disordered protein [33] and Dronpa is a photo-responsive green fluorescent protein [34]. This construct was adapted from BCB in our previous publication in the layer-by-layer assembly of an entirely protein-based thin film [35]. By simply mixing BDB with DC₆₀-SpyTag in PBS at room temperature, we introduced the DC₆₀ moiety to both ends of the protein and obtained a novel bioconjugate denoted as DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀ (Fig. 1). The successful synthesis of the conjugate was demonstrated directly by its lower mobility and slightly higher position in SDS-PAGE image (Fig. 3A). The elution profile on liquid chromatogram (LC) was essentially the same as the BDB precursor, indicating relatively minor changes to the overall size of the molecule (Fig. 3B). The MALDI-TOF MS spectra further confirm the precise attachment of two DC₆₀ motifs (Fig. 3C). The molecular weight of the reactant BDB was found at ∼70888 Da, which is close to the calculated value of 70, 907 Da (taking into consideration the loss of one water molecule and two hydrogen upon chromophore maturation [36]). After successful bi-functionalization, the mass of DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀ shifted to ∼78357 Da in MALDI-TOF MS spectrum, which is close to the expected molecular weight of 78, 751 Da within experimental error at this high molecular weight range (≤ 0.5%). Moreover, TEM were also used to observe the direct phase separation in DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. The freeze-dried samples were dispersed in water by ultrasonication and spotted on Formvar/Carbon 200 mesh grids to prepare the TEM sample. The flexible chains of the ELP give sufficient mobility to the two DC₆₀ ends and facilitate their self-aggregation. As shown in Fig. 3D, the dark phase is assigned to DC₆₀-rich phase. The average diameter of the dark phase is ∼7.95 nm (Fig. 3E). The illustration of molecular aggregation is depicted in Fig. 3F. We also noticed that once lyophilized, the sample could hardly be dissolved in water again. This could probably be explained by the physical crosslinking as a result of DC₆₀ aggregation (Fig. 3D inset and Fig. S11 in supporting information). Hence, the introduction of C₆₀ into proteins indeed brings in intriguing optical properties and self-assembly behaviors. In addition, according to the literature [37], the DC₆₀ could target specific protein structure with implications in functional biomolecular communication. It indicates that the conjugate may enhance or regulate specific protein-protein interactions involving protein/fullerenol recognition. Such conjugates may be useful for making drugs with better cell penetration and antibacterial capability.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (B) Liquid chromatogram (reversed-phase column) curves of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (C) MALDI-TOF MS Spectra of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (D) TEM image of DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (E) Size distribution of DC₆₀ aggregates. (F) Illustration of the aggregated structure of DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀ with DC₆₀ domains in red color and protein domains in green color.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, we report a water-soluble C₆₀ derivative bearing a reactive SpyTag (DC₆₀-SpyTag) for facile conjugation with proteins. The water solubility was imparted to C₆₀ by multiple hydroxyl groups. The SpyTag was installed on C₆₀ by CuAAC click chemistry and served as the reactive handle to couple with any SpyCatcher-bearing proteins. The efficient, cell-compatible SpyTag-SpyCatcher reaction enables the native conjugation between nonbiological motifs and protein molecules. The convenient synthesis of water-soluble DC₆₀-SpyTag offers a versatile and efficient reagent for site-specific modification of proteins under physiological conditions. It could help preserve the native functions of a protein during bioconjugation, which is particularly important for those proteins whose structures and functions are sensitive to non-physiological conditions. The number of DC₆₀ on the protein could be controlled by the predetermined number of SpyCatcher units in the protein design. We believe that the method offers a general and ready access to multifunctional protein bioconjugates containing exotic nonbiological components including, but not limited to C₆₀.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

  Acknowledgments

  We are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21925102, 21991132 and 21674003). This work was also supported by Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (No. BNLMS-CXXM-202006) and Clinical Medicine Plus X Project of Peking University, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

  Appendix A. Supplementary data

  Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.034.

  
  ^* Corresponding author.
  E-mail address: wenbin@pku.edu.cn (W.-B. Zhang).
  ¹ These two authors contributed equally to the paper.
  
• 1. [1]

     S. Massa, N. Devoogdt, Bioconjugation:Methods and Protocols, Humana Press, New York, 2019.

  2. [2]

     M.M. Zegota, T. Wang, C. Seidler, et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2665-2670. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00358

  3. [3]

     A.H. St. Amant, D. Lemen, S. Florinas, et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2406-2414. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00320

  4. [4]

     J. Morgenstern, G. Gil Alvaradejo, N. Bluthardt, et al., Biomacromolecules 19 (2018) 4250-4262. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01020

  5. [5]

     S. Carmali, H. Murata, K. Matyjaszewski, A.J. Russell, Biomacromolecules 19 (2018) 4044-4051. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01064

  6. [6]

     L. Reguera, Y. Méndez, A.R. Humpierre, O. Valdés, D.G. Rivera, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 1475-1486. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00126

  7. [7]

     D. Terada, S. Sotoma, Y. Harada, R. Igarashi, M. Shirakawa, Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2786-2792. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00412

  8. [8]

     Y. Hu, Y. Hou, H. Wang, H. Lu, Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2232-2238. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00237

  9. [9]

     A.M. Wawro, Y. Aoki, T. Muraoka, K. Tsumoto, K. Kinbara, Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 1913-1916. doi: 10.1039/C7CC05814D

  10. [10]

      M.M. Lino, S. Simoes, S. Pinho, L. Ferreira, Nanoscale 9 (2017) 18668-18680. doi: 10.1039/C7NR02414B

  11. [11]

      T. Wu, H. Huang, Y. Sheng, et al., J. Mater. Chem. B 6 (2018) 1011-1017. doi: 10.1039/C7TB03132G

  12. [12]

      D. Sabatino, S. Shah, C.N. Cultrara, et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 3638-3648. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00580

  13. [13]

      K. Renault, J.W. Fredy, P.Y. Renard, C. Sabot, Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2497-2513. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00252

  14. [14]

      J.C. Grim, T.E. Brown, B.A. Aguado, et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 4 (2018) 909-916. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00325

  15. [15]

      E. Montanari, A. Gennari, M. Pelliccia, et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 29 (2018) 2550-2560. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00227

  16. [16]

      S. Schoffelen, J. Beekwilder, M.F. Debets, D. Bosch, J.C. M. van Hest, Bioconjugate Chem. 24 (2013) 987-996. doi: 10.1021/bc400021j

  17. [17]

      W.B. Zhang, X.L. Wu, G.Z. Yin, Y. Shao, S.Z. D. Cheng, Mater. Horiz. 4 (2017) 117-132. doi: 10.1039/C6MH00448B

  18. [18]

      E. Saxon, C.R. Bertozzi, Science 287 (2000) 2007-2010. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.2007

  19. [19]

      B. Zakeri, J.O. Fierer, E. Celik, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 109 (2012) E690-E697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115485109

  20. [20]

      F. Sun, W.B. Zhang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 2078-2084. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.052

  21. [21]

      F. Zhang, W.B. Zhang, Chin. J. Chem. 38 (2020) 864-878. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202000083

  22. [22]

      F. Sun, W.B. Zhang, Chin. J. Chem. 38 (2020) 894-896. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202000101

  23. [23]

      D. Liu, W.H. Wu, Y.J. Liu, et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 3 (2017) 473-481. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00104

  24. [24]

      X.W. Wang, W.B. Zhang, Trends Biochem. Sci. 43 (2018) 806-817. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.07.001

  25. [25]

      T.U. J. Bruun, A.M. C. Andersson, S.J. Draper, M. Howarth, ACS Nano 12 (2018) 8855-8866. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02805

  26. [26]

      L. Yin, X. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4 (2018) 2095-2099. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00279

  27. [27]

      R. Wieduwild, M. Howarth, Biomaterials 180 (2018) 253-264. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.020

  28. [28]

      W.B. Zhang, Y. Tu, R. Ranjan, et al., Macromolecules 41 (2008) 515-517. doi: 10.1021/ma702345r

  29. [29]

      V.M. Torres, M. Posa, B. Srdjenovic, A.L. Simplício, Colloid Surf. B 82 (2011) 46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.012

  30. [30]

      R. Injac, M. Perse, M. Cerne, et al., Biomaterials 30 (2009) 1184-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.060

  31. [31]

      J.J. Yin, F. Lao, P.P. Fu, et al., Biomaterials 30 (2009) 611-621. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.061

  32. [32]

      R. Injac, M. Prijatelj, B. Strukelj, Fullerenol nanoparticles: toxicity and antioxidant activity, in: D. Armstrong, D. Bharali (Eds. ), Oxidative Stress and Nanotechnology. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol. 1028, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2013, pp. 75-100.

  33. [33]

      W.B. Zhang, F. Sun, D.A. Tirrell, F.H. Arnold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 13988-13997. doi: 10.1021/ja4076452

  34. [34]

      X. Wu, W. Huang, W.H. Wu, et al., Nano Res. 11 (2018) 5556-5565. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1890-y

  35. [35]

      J. Wei, W.H. Wu, R. Wang, et al., ACS Macro Lett. 7 (2018) 514-518. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00147

  36. [36]

      A. Higashino, M. Mizuno, Y. Mizutani, J. Phys. Chem. B 120 (2016) 3353-3359.

  37. [37]

      S. Zanzoni, A. Ceccon, M. Assfalg, et al., Nanoscale 7 (2015) 7197-7205. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00539F

• 

  Figure 1  Synthesis of C₆₀-protein bioconjugates by "click" reaction and SpyTag-SpyCatcher chemistry.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (A) FT-IR spectra of DC₆₀-SpyTag and N₃-SpyTag. (B) MALDI-TOF MS spectra of SpyCatcher (inset) and DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate. (C) UV-vis spectra of DC₆₀-SpyTag, DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate (the inset is the solution of the conjugate at the concentration of 1 mg/mL) and SpyCatcher. (D) TEM of DC₆₀-SpyTag/SpyCatcher conjugate with concentration of 10 mg/mL in water.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (B) Liquid chromatogram (reversed-phase column) curves of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (C) MALDI-TOF MS Spectra of BDB and DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (D) TEM image of DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀. (E) Size distribution of DC₆₀ aggregates. (F) Illustration of the aggregated structure of DC₆₀-BDB-DC₆₀ with DC₆₀ domains in red color and protein domains in green color.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•