English

• Second harmonic generation (SHG) crystals and birefringence crystals, which are two key components for solid state lasers, have a wide range of applications in many scientific and technological fields, such as photolithography, advanced instruments, optical communications, and all-solid-state lasers [1–13]. A range of optical crystal materials with excellent properties are now being discovered, such as K₃Nb₃Ge₂O₁₃ (0.196@546 nm, 17.5 × KDP) [14], NH₄[LiC₃H(CH₃)O₄] (0.06@546 nm, 4 × KDP) [15], Sc(HSeO₃)₃ (0.105@1064 nm, 5 × KDP) [16], (C₃N₆H₇)(C₃N₆H₆)HgCl₃ (0.246@1064 nm, 5 × KDP) [17], CaYF(SeO₃)₂ (0.138@532 nm, ) [18], Y₃F(SeO₃)₄ (0.038@532 nm, 5.5 × KDP) [18], RbSn₂Cl₅ (0.168@546 nm) [19], K₂BaGeS₅ (0.192@1064 nm) [20], Ba(H₂C₆N₇O₃)₂·8H₂O (0.24@550 nm, 12 × KDP) [21], CsH₂C₆N₉·H₂O (0.55@550 nm) [22], Cd(H₂C₆N₇O₃)₂·8H₂O (0.6@550 nm) [23], Cs₄Zn₅P₆S₁₈I₂ (0.108@546 nm, 1.1 × AGS) [24]. However, with the advancement of time, the demand for excellent optical crystals is still great, and the search for excellent optical materials is still very urgent.

  According to the relationship between structure and optical properties [25,26], the introduction of the following groups into the system favours compounds that exhibit large SHG effects and birefringence: (1) The π-conjugated anions [17], such as [CO₃]²⁻ [27–29], [NO₃]⁻ [30–34], [BO₃]³⁻ [35,36], and [B₃O₆]³⁻ [37]; (2) The stereochemically active lone pair (SCALP) metal cations, e.g., Sb³⁺ [38], Sn²⁺ [39,40] and Bi³⁺ [41]. It is noted that Sb³⁺ cation exhibits abundant geometric methods of irregular coordination, such as [SbO₃]/[SbF₃] trigonal pyramids [34,42], [SbO₄]/[SbO₂F₂] seesaws [43,44], [SbO₂F₃]/[SbO₃F₃] polyhedral [2], which favours compounds exhibiting rich structures. While due to Sb³⁺ is easy to hydrolyse, it can be challenging to study. But the hydrolysis problem was overcome by our group via introducing the deep eutectic solvents such as choline and urea into the system. Subsequently, a series of pure inorganic antimony-based optical crystal materials with excellent optical properties were successively synthesized, such as CsSbF₂SO₄ (3.0 × KDP, 0.112@1064 nm) [6], K₂Sb(P₂O₇)F (4.0 × KDP, 0.157@546 nm) [45], RbSbSO₄Cl₂ (2.7 × KDP, 0.11@1064 nm) [46].

  Similar to low eutectic solvents consisting of choline chloride and urea, ionic liquids have a low melting point and an anhydrous environment, which provides a relatively mild and anhydrous environment to ensure that Sb³⁺ cations do not undergo hydrolysis. By looking up ionic liquids, we found that ionic liquids with organic π-conjugated rings are a good choice of solvent. Usually researchers choose alkali metals/alkaline earth metals that do not have d-d and f-f leaps in order to ensure that the cut-off edge of the compound is not red-shifted. However, this would result in the fact that the A-site cation in the ABX compound does not contribute to SHG and birefringence properties, which hinders further improvement of the properties. In contrast, if the alkali metal/alkaline earth metal can be replaced by organic cations with π-conjugation rings, the A-site cation will be activated. The synergistic effect of cation-anion will lead to a significant improvement in the optical properties of the compounds. At the same time, the large size of the organic cation can make the spacing between layers or chains of the structure, which may be able to enhance the optical properties of the compounds. In addition, the designable organic ligands will make it possible to design the backbone structure and properties in a targeted manner.

  Based on the research ideas mentioned above, a systematical study has been carried out on organic-inorganic hybrid antimony-based materials with organic π-conjugated ring systems. Firstly, two organic-inorganic hybrid antimony-based materials, named (C₃H₅N₂)SbF₂SO₄ (Ⅰ) and (C₅H₆N)SbF₂SO₄ (Ⅱ), have been successfully synthesized by introducing Sb³⁺ cation containing SCALP and organic π-conjugated cations into sulphate systems. The synergistic interactions of the organic π-conjugated cations, the inorganic [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaw anions and the [SO₄]²⁻ distorted tetrahedra anions make their UV absorption edges approach 297 nm and 283 nm, respectively, and raise their birefringence up to 0.193 and 0.179@546 nm, respectively. Interestingly, although the two compounds have the same stoichiometric ratio and similar one-dimensional (1D) chain structure, they show opposite macroscopic symmetry, with compound Ⅰ crystallizes in the centrosymmetric (CS) space group of P1 and compound Ⅱ crystallizes in the polar noncentrosymmetric (NCS) space group of Pca2₁. And the NCS compound Ⅱ exhibits a large second-harmonic generation (SHG) response (1.6 × KDP). The both of compounds are auspicious near UV optical crystals proved by experimental tests.

  Synthesis: Analytical grade [C₃H₅N₂][HSO₄] (Lanzhou, GreenChem ILs, 99%), [C₅H₆N][HSO₄] ((Lanzhou, GreenChem ILs, 99%), SbF₃ (Aladdin, 99%) were used as reaction reagents without further purification. Herein, the ionothermal synthesis method, which ensure the Sb³⁺ cations do not undergo hydrolysis, is used, which provides a very useful option for the subsequent growth of easily hydrolysable compounds. The reagents of SbF₃ (0.537 g, 3 mmol) were added in [C₃H₅N₂][HSO₄] (0.499 g, 3 mmol) / [C₅H₆N][HSO₄] (0.532 g, 3 mmol). Stirring the mixture for 20 min, then placed the solution into a 23 mL autoclave with a Teflon liner. Heated the autoclave in an oven at 85 ℃ for 5 days and then cooled slowly to room temperature at a rate of 3 ℃/h. After washing with acetone, colourless transparent block/rod crystals (Fig. S1 in Supporting information) were obtained in 46%–50% yield (based on Sb).

  The compound Ⅰ crystallizes in the P1 (NO. 2), which is CS space group. There are one independent Sb atom, one S atom, two F atoms, one [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ group and four O atoms in one asymmetric unit. The crystal structure of compound (C₃H₅N₂)SbF₂SO₄ is composed of the [SO₄]²⁻ tetrahedra, the [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaw complex and the organic π-conjugated [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ groups as charge balancing cations. The [SO₄]²⁻ tetrahedra is formed by one S atom coordinated with four O atoms (Fig. 1a). The [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaw is formed by one Sb atom coordinated with two dangling F and two bridging O atoms (Fig. 1a). The [SbF₂O₂SO₄]⁵⁻ 1D chain is formed by [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ anions connected with [SO₄]²⁻ anions via bridging oxygen atoms (Fig. 1b). The organic π-conjugated [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ cations (Fig. 1c) are located between chains, and the 1D-helical chains are connected to each other to the three dimensional (3D) framework via N—H⋯O and N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1d).

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) The [SbO₂F₂] and [SO₄] groups. (b) A 1D helical chain of [SbF₂O₂SO₄]⁵⁻. (c) The π-conjugated protonated imidazole cation. (d) The 3D framework of compound Ⅰ viewed along the a-axis. (e) The π-conjugated protonated pyridine cation. (f) The 3D framework of compound Ⅱ viewed along the c-axis. Sb purple, S yellow, C black, O red, N blue, F green, H white.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The compound Ⅱ crystallizes in the NCS space group of Pca2₁ (No. 29). There are one independent Sb atom, one S atom, two F atoms, one [C₅H₆N]⁺ (Fig. 1e) group and four O atoms in an asymmetric unit. The compound Ⅱ has a similar structure to compound Ⅰ, the same [SO₄]²⁻ tetrahedral and [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaw are present. Except that in compound structure Ⅱ, it is the organic π-conjugated [C₅H₆N]⁺ cations that acts as the charge-balancing cations between chains. The 1D-helical chains are in contact with each other to the 3D framework via N—H⋯O and N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1f). And the bond length information of two title compounds for the moiety is shown in Fig. S2 (Supporting information).

  The experimental powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the compounds Ⅰ and Ⅱ are consistent with the calculated patterns fitted from the single-crystal XRD data analysis (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), confirming that the samples are phase pure.

  Fig. S4 (Supporting information) shows the results of the thermogravimetric analysis. Compounds Ⅰ and Ⅱ were stable up to 250 and 200 ℃, respectively. And the decomposition products of two compound both were confirmed to be SbO₂, which is demonstrated that PXRD patterns (Fig. S5 in Supporting information).

  Fig. S6 (Supporting information) shows the infrared (IR) spectra of two title compounds. The moderate absorption bands viewed at 1133, 1040 cm⁻¹ for compound Ⅰ and strong absorption bands viewed at 1184, 989 cm⁻¹ for compound Ⅱ can be allocated to υ₃ SO₄ asymmetric stretching. The absorption peaks at 938, 896 cm⁻¹ and 934 cm⁻¹ in two compounds are the result of the stretching vibration of υ₁ SO₄ which is symmetric, respectively. The characteristic absorption peaks found at 620, 532 cm⁻¹ for compound Ⅰ can be allocated to Sb-O/F asymmetric stretching and the bending of Sb-O/F bonds, respectively. Similarly, the Sb-O/F asymmetric stretching and the bending of Sb-O/F bonds for compound Ⅱ can be viewed at 625, 535 cm⁻¹, respectively. The bands viewed at 3163/1587 cm⁻¹ and 3083, 1544 cm⁻¹ belong to the stretching vibration of N—H and the bending vibration of N—H, respectively. The peaks at 1184, 752 cm⁻¹ of compound Ⅰ can be assigned to the stretching vibration and asymmetric stretching vibration of imidazole ring, respectively, and the bands at 1493, 748 cm⁻¹ of compound Ⅱ belong to the vibration of pyridinium cation. The above characteristic absorption peak findings are in agreement with the compounds reported so far [6,43,47].

  Figs. 2a and b show the UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of two title compounds. The optical band gap of two compounds are 4.17 and 4.38 eV, respectively, with the UV cutoff edges of 297 and 283 nm, respectively, which is an indication that they may be optical crystals in the short-wave UV range.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a, b) The UV–vis diffuse reflection spectra for Ⅰ and Ⅱ powder. (c) Experimental birefringence of Ⅰ and Ⅱ crystals. (d) The powder SHG measurement of compound Ⅱ. The insets show the SHG intensity for the compound Ⅱ and KDP samples.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  A ZEISS Axio A5 polarising microscope was used to measure the birefringence of two title compounds (Fig. 2c). The measurements of birefringence are 0.193@546 nm and 0.179@546 nm for Ⅰ and Ⅱ crystals, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3, when the π-conjugated organic cations are used to replace conventional alkali and alkaline earth metals, the cations are activated. Due to the synergistic effect of π-conjugated organic cations, Sb³⁺-based polyhedra and [SO₄]²⁻ anionic tetrahedra, compared to most other antimony based optical crystals containing tetrahedral anions, the birefringence of the titled compounds are significantly higher., e.g., CsSb(SO₄)₂ (0.174@546 nm) [43], RbSb(SO₄)₂ (0.171@546 nm) [43], K₂Sb(P₂O₇)F (0.157@546 nm) [45], Sb(HPO₃)F (0.149@546 nm) [48], Sb₄O₄(SO₄)(OH)₂₁ (0.147@1064 nm) [42], NH₄SbF₂SO₄ (0.138@1064 nm) [49], CsSbF₂SO₄ (0.112@1064 nm) [6], RbSbCl₂SO₄ (0.11@1064 nm) [46], Rb₂SO₄·(SbF₃)₂ (0.11@1064 nm) [50], RbSbF₂SO₄ (0.1@1064 nm) [44], Rb₂SO₄·SbF₃ (0.09@1064 nm) [51], NH₄SbSO₄Cl₂ (0.09@1064 nm) [52], K₂SO₄·SbF₃ (0.08@1064 nm) [51], NH₄SbFPO₄·H₂O (0.08@1064 nm) [53], K₄Sb(SO₄)₃Cl (0.066@546 nm) [54], Sb₆O₇(SO₄)₂ (0.052@546 nm) [55], Rb₆Sb₄(SO₄)₃F₁₂ (0.01@1064 nm) [56].

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  Comparisons of the birefringence of the reported compounds and most other antimony-based optical crystals containing tetrahedra anions.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To further illustrate the contribution of functional groups to the birefringence in the compounds above, the detailed analysis of the micromechanics is carried out. Because birefringence in crystals arises from the efficient overlapping of the microscopic polarisation anisotropies of all birefringently active groups, that are reflected in their spatial orientation and density. Herein, we have obtained from theoretical calculations that two compounds both are biaxial crystals (n_z > n_y > n_x). This means that the greater the number of birefringent functional groups acting on the optical principal axis Z is, the larger birefringence it obtains. So, to investigate their contribution to birefringence, the relationship between the YZ plane (bc plane for Ⅰ, ab plane for Ⅱ) and the orientation of the lone pair electrons in Sb³⁺ cations and the π-conjugated organic cations planes is therefore important. The smaller the angle between the direction of lone pairs and the YZ plane is, the larger the contribution of the metal cations with SCALP to birefringence will be. As shown in Figs. 4a and c, the angles between the lone pair electron of Sb³⁺ and YZ plane are 9.414° and 7.917°, separately. And the dihedral angles between the π-conjugated organic cations and YZ plane are 7.834° and 16.105°, separately (Figs. 4b and d). These results show that the organic π-conjugated cations ([C₃H₅N₂]⁺ and [C₅H₆N]⁺), the inorganic [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaw anions contribute significantly to the optical properties of both examples of compounds. As shown in Table S6 (Supporting information), we calculated the contribution of [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ anions, [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ and [C₅H₆N]⁺ cations to birefringence in a unit cell. The results also further confirm that the anionic and cationic synergistic strategy makes the compounds display large birefringence.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  (a, c) The angles between the lone pair electron of Sb³⁺ and YZ plane of (a) compound Ⅰ, (c) compound Ⅱ. The dihedral angles of the π-conjugated organic cations and YZ plane of (b) compound Ⅰ, (d) compound Ⅱ.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The 1064 nm Q-switch laser based on the Kurtz−Perry method was used for measuring the powder SHG intensities of compound Ⅱ. As shown in Fig. 2d. The SHG intensity gradually increased as the particle sizes increase, demonstrating that the material is phase-matchable (type Ⅰ) in the short-wave UV and visible light regions. And the material shows a large SHG effect that is approximately 1.6 times greater than that of KDP.

  To further investigate how structure relates to optical properties, both of them were calculated based on density functional theory. The band gaps of both compounds were calculated at approximately 3.98 and 3.85 eV, respectively, indicating that the calculated values is lower than the measuring one (Fig. S7 in Supporting information).

  Within Kleinman symmetry limits, compound Ⅱ has three independent SHG tensors (d₁₅, d₂₄, and d₃₃). The maximum of the SHG tensor is 1.0 × 10⁻⁹ esu@ 1064 nm (1.165 eV), which is in line with our experimental value (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). Both of the compounds belong to biaxial crystals by revealing of the refractive index dispersion curves. The calculated birefringence (Δn) is about 0.198@546 nm and 0.180@546 nm, respectively, that coincides well with the experimental one (Figs. 5a and d).

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  Calculated refractive indices of compound (a) Ⅰ, (d) Ⅱ. Total and partial density of states of compound (b) Ⅰ, (e) Ⅱ. Electron density difference maps of compound (c) Ⅰ, (f) Ⅱ.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The total and partial state densities (TDOS/PDOS) are calculated for two title compounds (Figs. 5b and e), which indicate that in the range of −10 eV to 0 eV, the main components are consist of C-2p, N-2p, O-2p, F-2p, S-3p orbitals. The C-2p, N-2p, Sb-5p orbitals make significant contribution to the range of 0 eV to 10 eV. As is known to all, the optical properties of compound are major from electron transitions near the forbidden band. Obviously, the [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ groups, [C₅H₆N]⁺ groups, the [SO₄]²⁻ distorted tetrahedral and the [SbO₂F₂]³⁻ seesaws are basically responsible for the optical properties, which can also be verified by the electron-density difference (EDD) maps (Figs. 5c and f), the asymmetric electron clouds on Sb³⁺ demonstrate that the lone electron pairs are stereochemically active, moreover, the electron clouds on [C₃H₅N₂]⁺ and [C₅H₆N]⁺ π-conjugated cations generate large optical anisotropy.

  In summary, two novel organic-inorganic hybrid antimony-based optical crystals, (C₃H₅N₂)SbF₂SO₄ (Ⅰ) and (C₅H₆N)SbF₂SO₄ (Ⅱ), have been successfully synthesised by combining Sb³⁺ cation containing SCALP and organic π-conjugated cations into the sulfate system by the ionothermal synthesis method. Via cation-anion synergistic strategy, the birefringence of title compounds raise up to 0.193 and 0.179@546 nm, respectively, and the UV absorption edges of them approach 297 and 283 nm, respectively, that implies both of Ⅰ and Ⅱ are favourable short wave UV birefringent crystals. Interestingly, although they have the same stoichiometric ratio and similar 1D chain structure, they exhibit opposite macroscopic symmetry. And the NCS compound (C₅H₆N)SbF₂SO₄ is type-Ⅰ phase matching with the SHG efficiency about 1.6 times that of KDP. This work will provide effective research ideas and methods for high-performance UV birefringent materials and nonlinear materials in the future.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  The authors thank Dr. Daichuan Ma at Analytical and Testing center, Sichuan University for technical help in the Material Studio calculations. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22122106, 22071158, 21971171, 22305166), the Fundamental Research Funds from Sichuan University (No. 2021SCUNL101), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2023NSFC1066).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109235.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     D. Cyranoski, Nature 457 (2009) 953–955. doi: 10.1038/457953a

  2. [2]

     D. Zhang, Q. Wang, T. Zheng, et al., Sci. China Mater. 65 (2022) 3115–3124. doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2088-0

  3. [3]

     G.J. Yi, G.H. Zou, Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 42 (2023) 100020. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100020

  4. [4]

     X.H. Dong, L. Huang, H.M. Zeng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e2021167.

  5. [5]

     L. Wang, F. Yang, X.Y. Zhao, et al., Dalton Trans 48 (2019) 15144–15150. doi: 10.1039/C9DT03233A

  6. [6]

     X.H. Dong, L. Huang, C.F. Hu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 6528–6534. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900637

  7. [7]

     Y. Zhou, Y.Q. Li, Q.R. Ding, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 263–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.014

  8. [8]

     G.H. Zou, K.M. Ok, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 5404–5409. doi: 10.1039/D0SC01936D

  9. [9]

     X.H. Dong, Y. Long, L. Huang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C. 10 (2022) 17577–17582. doi: 10.1039/D2TC04112J

  10. [10]

      X.H. Dong, Y. Long, L. Huang, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 6441–6447.

  11. [11]

      M. Mutailipu, J. Han, Z. Li, et al., Nat. Photon. 17 (2023) 694–701. doi: 10.1038/s41566-023-01228-7

  12. [12]

      X. Chen, Y.Q. Li, J.H. Luo, et al., Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 42 (2023) 100044. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100044

  13. [13]

      T. Ouyang, Y.G. Shen, S.G. Zhao, et al., Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 42 (2023) 100024. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100024

  14. [14]

      K.C. Chen, C.S. Lin, J.D. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202217039. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217039

  15. [15]

      H.T. Tian, C.S. Lin, Y.Q. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202304858. doi: 10.1002/anie.202304858

  16. [16]

      Z. Bai, J. Lee, H. Kim, et al., Small 19 (2023) 2207709. doi: 10.1002/smll.202207709

  17. [17]

      Z. Bai, J. Lee, H. Kim, et al., Small 19 (2023) 2301756. doi: 10.1002/smll.202301756

  18. [18]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, F. Kong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301420. doi: 10.1002/anie.202301420

  19. [19]

      J. Guo, J. Huang, A. Tudi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202304238. doi: 10.1002/anie.202304238

  20. [20]

      W. Xie, F. Li, J. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202307895. doi: 10.1002/anie.202307895

  21. [21]

      Y. Li, W. Huang, Y. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202215145. doi: 10.1002/anie.202215145

  22. [22]

      Y. Li, Y. Zhou, W. Huang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202208811. doi: 10.1002/anie.202208811

  23. [23]

      Y. Li, J. Zheng, Y. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202304498. doi: 10.1002/anie.202304498

  24. [24]

      X.D. Chai, M.Z. Li, S.J. Lin, et al., Small 19 (2023) 2303847. doi: 10.1002/smll.202303847

  25. [25]

      W.K. Wang, D.J. Mei, S.G. Wen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 2301–2315. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.089

  26. [26]

      C.C. Jin, H. Zeng, F. Zhang, et al., Chem. Mater. 34 (2022) 440–450. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03974

  27. [27]

      G.H. Zou, H. Jo, S.J. Lim, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 8619–8622. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804354

  28. [28]

      G.H. Zou, Z.E. Lin, H.M. Zeng, et al., Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 8957–8961. doi: 10.1039/C8SC03672A

  29. [29]

      Y.T. Zhang, Y. Long, X.H. Dong, et al., Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 4538–4541. doi: 10.1039/C9CC00581A

  30. [30]

      X.H. Dong, L. Huang, Q.Y. Liu, et al., Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 5792–5795. doi: 10.1039/C8CC03007C

  31. [31]

      Y. Long, X.H. Dong, H.M. Zeng, et al., Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 4184–4192. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00047

  32. [32]

      Y. Long, X.H. Dong, L. Huang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 12578–12585. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01687

  33. [33]

      L. Wang, H.M. Wang, D. Zhang, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 8 (2021) 3317–3324. doi: 10.1039/D1QI00395J

  34. [34]

      Q. Wang, J.X. Ren, D. Wang, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 2107–2114. doi: 10.1039/D2QI02637F

  35. [35]

      S. Zhao, P. Gong, L. Bai, et al., Nat Commun 5 (2014) 4019. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5019

  36. [36]

      J. Zhou, Y. Liu, H. Wu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 19006–19010. doi: 10.1002/anie.202008346

  37. [37]

      W.J. Xie, Z. Feng, J.G. Mao, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2022) 18260–18266.

  38. [38]

      D. Zhang, Q. Wang, T. Zheng, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 896 (2021) 162921.

  39. [39]

      Y.W. Ge, Q. Wang, F. Yang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 8322–8330. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01037

  40. [40]

      L.Y. Ren, L.H. Cheng, X.Y. Zhou, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 5602–5610. doi: 10.1039/D3QI01213A

  41. [41]

      X.H. Dong, Z.Z. Zhang, L. Huang, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 5572–5578. doi: 10.1039/D2QI01675C

  42. [42]

      Q. Wei, K. Wang, C. He, et al., Inorg. Chem. 15 (2021) 11648–11654.

  43. [43]

      Y. Lan, J.X. Ren, P. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108652. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108652

  44. [44]

      F. Yang, L.J. Huang, X.Y. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C. 7 (2019) 8131–8138. doi: 10.1039/C9TC02180A

  45. [45]

      Y.L. Deng, L. Huang, X.H. Dong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 21151–21156. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009441

  46. [46]

      F.F. He, Y.L. Deng, X.Y. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C. 7 (2019) 5748–5754. doi: 10.1039/C9TC01249D

  47. [47]

      F. Chen, Y.Y. Ren, J.N. Guo, et al., Chem. Commun. 53 (2017) 1595–1598. doi: 10.1039/C6CC08924K

  48. [48]

      Y. Long, X.H. Dong, L. Huang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 43 (2022) 16997–17001.

  49. [49]

      F.F. He, Y.W. Ge, X.Y. Zhao, Dalton Trans 49 (2020) 5276–5282. doi: 10.1039/D0DT00846J

  50. [50]

      Q. Wang, L. Wang, X.Y. Zhao, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 3125–3132. doi: 10.1039/C9QI01036J

  51. [51]

      F.F. He, L. Wang, C.F. Hu, et al., Dalton Trans 47 (2018) 17486–17492. doi: 10.1039/C8DT04400G

  52. [52]

      F.F. He, Q. Wang, C.F. Hu, et al., Cryst. Growth Des. 18 (2018) 6239–6247. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01102

  53. [53]

      F.F. He, Y.W. Ge, X.Y. Zhao, et al., Dalton Trans. 49 (2020) 5276–5282.

  54. [54]

      F. Yang, L. Wang, Y. Ge, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 834 (2020) 155154. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155154

  55. [55]

      Q. Wei, C. He, K. Wang, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 27 (2021) 5880–5884. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004859

  56. [56]

      X.H. Dong, Y. Long, X.Y. Zhao, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 8345–8352. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00756

• 

  Figure 1  (a) The [SbO₂F₂] and [SO₄] groups. (b) A 1D helical chain of [SbF₂O₂SO₄]⁵⁻. (c) The π-conjugated protonated imidazole cation. (d) The 3D framework of compound Ⅰ viewed along the a-axis. (e) The π-conjugated protonated pyridine cation. (f) The 3D framework of compound Ⅱ viewed along the c-axis. Sb purple, S yellow, C black, O red, N blue, F green, H white.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a, b) The UV–vis diffuse reflection spectra for Ⅰ and Ⅱ powder. (c) Experimental birefringence of Ⅰ and Ⅱ crystals. (d) The powder SHG measurement of compound Ⅱ. The insets show the SHG intensity for the compound Ⅱ and KDP samples.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  Comparisons of the birefringence of the reported compounds and most other antimony-based optical crystals containing tetrahedra anions.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  (a, c) The angles between the lone pair electron of Sb³⁺ and YZ plane of (a) compound Ⅰ, (c) compound Ⅱ. The dihedral angles of the π-conjugated organic cations and YZ plane of (b) compound Ⅰ, (d) compound Ⅱ.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  Calculated refractive indices of compound (a) Ⅰ, (d) Ⅱ. Total and partial density of states of compound (b) Ⅰ, (e) Ⅱ. Electron density difference maps of compound (c) Ⅰ, (f) Ⅱ.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•